Notebookcheck Logo

Kısa inceleme: Asus F756UX-T7013T Notebook

Parlak multimedia. Asus'un yeni 17 inçlik masaüstü yerine geçmesi planlanan cihazları piyanolar gibi parlak yüzeylere sahip. Multimedia cihazı 770 Euro gibi bir başlangıç fiyatına sahip olduğundan çok fazla beklentiye girmemek gerek. Ama elbette süprizleri de seviyoruz.
Asus F756UX-T7013T (F756 Seri)
İşlemci
Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake
Grafik kartı
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M - 2048 MB VRAM, Çekirdek: 1124 MHz, Bellek: 1800 MHz, DDR3, ForceWare 353.84, Nvidia Optimus
Bellek
8 GB 
, DDR3L, 1600 MHz, dual-channel, both banks filled
Görüntü
17.30 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Chi Mei CMN1735 / N173HGE-E11, TN LED, parlak: hayır
Anakart
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Harddisk
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680, 1000 GB 
, 5400 rpm
Ses kartı
Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Bağlantılar
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm combo audio in/out jack, Kart okuyucular: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Network
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Atheros Communications AR9565 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GPS
Optik okuyucu
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 35.5 x 415 x 272
Batarya
38 Wh Lithium-Ion, removeable, 2 cells
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: stereo, Klavye: chiclet, Klavye ışığı: hayır, 24 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
2.7 kg, Güç kaynağı: 261 g
Fiyat
799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Asus F756UX-T7013T
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Asus F756UX-T7013T
273
cd/m²
249
cd/m²
245
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
268
cd/m²
227
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
240
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
Chi Mei CMN1735 / N173HGE-E11 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 273 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 254.7 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 83 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 265 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1576:1 (Siyah: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.97 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
Asus F756UX-T7013T vs. AdobeRGB
Asus F756UX-T7013T vs. AdobeRGB
Asus F756UX-T7013T vs. sRGB
Asus F756UX-T7013T vs. sRGB
Pixel grid
Pixel grid
Asus F756UX-T7013TMedion Erazer P7644HP ProBook 470 G3HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
Display
-2%
1%
4%
Display P3 Coverage
63.9
63.4
-1%
65.1
2%
65.7
3%
sRGB Coverage
93.7
90.3
-4%
92
-2%
97.6
4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
64.6
64.5
0%
66.5
3%
67.7
5%
Response Times
-60%
2%
-89%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 ?(20, 22)
48 ?(30, 18)
-14%
35 ?(17.6, 17.2)
17%
70 ?(32, 38)
-67%
Response Time Black / White *
21 ?(6, 15)
36 ?(22, 14)
-71%
24 ?(6.4, 17.2)
-14%
46 ?(16, 30)
-119%
PWM Frequency
1000 ?(90)
50 ?(90)
-95%
200 ?(50)
-80%
Screen
-17%
2%
3%
Brightness middle
268
296
10%
314
17%
309
15%
Brightness
255
280
10%
291
14%
292
15%
Brightness Distribution
83
87
5%
88
6%
86
4%
Black Level *
0.17
0.48
-182%
0.32
-88%
0.27
-59%
Contrast
1576
617
-61%
981
-38%
1144
-27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.18
4.71
34%
3.43
52%
4.53
37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.67
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.97
5.17
35%
3.72
53%
5.66
29%
Gamma
2.34 94%
2.33 94%
2.39 92%
2.62 84%
CCT
8541 76%
7613 85%
6764 96%
7893 82%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
59
0%
59.8
1%
62
5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
90
-4%
92
-2%
98
4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-26% / -23%
2% / 2%
-27% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1000 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP ProBook 470 G3
Intel Core i7-6500U
323 Points +12%
Medion Erazer P7644
Intel Core i7-6500U
319 Points +10%
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
Intel Core i7-6500U
316 Points +9%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Intel Core i5-6200U
289 Points
CPU Single 64Bit
HP ProBook 470 G3
Intel Core i7-6500U
125 Points +8%
Medion Erazer P7644
Intel Core i7-6500U
125 Points +8%
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
Intel Core i7-6500U
123 Points +6%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4357
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
9881
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.33 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.2 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
116 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
289 Points
Yardım
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
3751 Points +19%
HP ProBook 470 G3
Radeon R7 M340, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-75JC3T0
3399 Points +7%
Medion Erazer P7644
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 256GB PC3110-S10C
3240 Points +2%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
3162 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
4660 Points +17%
Medion Erazer P7644
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 256GB PC3110-S10C
4494 Points +13%
HP ProBook 470 G3
Radeon R7 M340, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-75JC3T0
4177 Points +5%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
3969 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3162 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3969 puan
Yardım
Asus F756UX-T7013T
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
Medion Erazer P7644
Phison 256GB PC3110-S10C
HP ProBook 470 G3
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-75JC3T0
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
15221%
16%
-10%
Read Seq
105.8
511
383%
111.4
5%
104.6
-1%
Read 4k
0.413
32.35
7733%
0.434
5%
0.358
-13%
Read 4k QD32
0.812
305.7
37548%
1.126
39%
0.679
-16%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
Maksimum transfer hızı: 33.1 MB/s
Minimum transfer hızı: 104.6 MB/s
Ortlama transfer hızı: 81.3 MB/s
Erişim hızı: 19.5 ms
Yakma hızı: 256.5 MB/s
İşlemci kullanımı: 10.9 %
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
5400 Points +32%
Medion Erazer P7644
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
4209 Points +3%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
4083 Points
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
2389 Points -41%
HP ProBook 470 G3
AMD Radeon R7 M340
2151 Points -47%
3DMark 11 Performance
3846 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8906 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2541 puan
Yardım
düşük orta yüksek ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 122 82.8 69.7 24.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 55.1 33 17.5
XCOM 2 (2016) 50.2 19.8 13.3
The Division (2016) 50.3 37 18 13.6
Hitman 2016 (2016) 38.2 34.6 20.9 19.7

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta
32.4 / 32.6 / 32.6 dB
HDD
32.7 dB
DVD
37.4 / dB
Çalışırken
42 / 45.2 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
sessiz
40 dB(A)
duyulabilirlik
50 dB(A)
gürültülü
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm uzaklık)   environment noise: 31.2 dB(A)
Maksimum yük
 42 °C41.8 °C35 °C 
 40.3 °C42 °C25.7 °C 
 29.9 °C27 °C28 °C 
Maksimum: 42 °C
Ortalama: 34.6 °C
40.6 °C50.5 °C40.3 °C
27.3 °C42.8 °C38.6 °C
26.7 °C26.7 °C25 °C
Maksimum: 50.5 °C
Ortalama: 35.4 °C
Güç kaynağı  42.5 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.9 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.5 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.9 °C / 85.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0 / 1 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 5.8 / 11.2 / 11.9 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 54 / 84 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus F756UX-T7013TMedion Erazer P7644HP ProBook 470 G3HP Pavilion 17-g120ng
Battery Runtime
32%
12%
18%
Reader / Idle
491
490
0%
WiFi v1.3
217
287
32%
277
28%
256
18%
Load
75
81
8%
H.264
270
Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
8h 11min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 37min
DVD
2h 25min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
1h 15min

Artılar

+ USB 3.1 Typce C
+ Depolama alanı bakım kapağı
+ Çıkarılabilir temel ünite kapağı
+ İyi touchpad
+ Fiyatı için çok iyi kontrasta sahip makul TN ekran
+ Makul ses sistemi
+ Yüzey sıcaklıkları rahatsız edici değil

Eksiler

- Bazı yerlerde kasa stabil değil
- Kapağı açmak için iki el de gerekli
- Ön tarafta 2 adet USB 2.0
- 5 GHz WiFi yok
- Yavaş kart okuyucu
- Batarya dışardan çıkarılamıyor
- Neredeyse sürekli duyulabilir sabit disk
In review: Asus F756UX-T7013T. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Asus F756UX-T7013T. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Büyük ve kaba görünüme sahip masaüstü yerin geçemesi planlanan notebooklar kısa batarya ömrüne sahip ve parlak yüzeyleri ile fanlarının ilgisini çekecektir. Fiyatı için yüksek kontrasta sahip cihaz teknik herhangi bir sorunu barındırmıyor.

Kullanıcı 770 Euroluk fiyatından beklediğinden fazlasını bulabilir.

Klavye yazım işleri için biraz uygun denebilir. Kasa bazı noktalarda stabiliteden yoksun ancak masaüstünde fark edilmeyecektir. Sadece arayüzler olarak çok beklentiye girmemek gerekli. VGA, USB Typce C ve kablosuz teknolojiler mevcut. WiFi modülünün düşük performansı biraz hayal kırıklığı ve 5 GHz kullanıcıları için karar verme noktası olacaktır.

Bu sayede F756UX kısıtlı bütçeye sahip oyuncu ve multimedia kullanıcıları için ideal bir model. Cihazın basitliğini tatmin edici bulduysanız, daha pahalı SSD modeli de tercih edebilirsiniz. i7-6500 işlemci opsiyonunun testlerimiz esnasında çok büyük bir kazanç göstermediğini gördük, çünkü asıl kısıtlayıcı nokta grafik kartı. 

Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.

Asus F756UX-T7013T - 05/12/2016 v5.1(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

İşcilik
71 / 98 → 73%
Klavye
76%
Mouse
79%
Bağlanılabilirlik
43 / 81 → 53%
Ağırlık
58 / 20-67 → 81%
Batarya
73%
Görüntü
82%
Oyun performansı
72 / 85 → 85%
Uygulama performansı
71 / 92 → 77%
Isınma
90%
Ses
77 / 95 → 81%
Audio
78%
Camera
61 / 85 → 71%
Ortalama
72%
78%
Multimedia - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Kısa inceleme: Asus F756UX-T7013T Notebook
Sven Kloevekorn, 2016-05-27 (Update: 2016-05-27)