Notebookcheck Logo

Kısa inceleme: LG Class (H650E) akıllı telefon

Premium arka kapak. LG, makul fiyatlı ama aynı zamanda da yüksek kaliteli orta sınıf bir cihaz sunuyor, Class. Ancak premium bileşenler yapım ve telefon kalitesindeki zayıflıkları kapatamıyor.
LG Class
İşlemci
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 4 x 1.2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafik kartı
Qualcomm Adreno 306
Bellek
1536 MB 
Görüntü
5.00 inç 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Gorilla Glass 3, parlak: evet
Harddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.89 GB Boş
Bağlantılar
1 USB 2.0, Ses çıkışları: combo audio, Kart okuyucular: micro-SD, Alıcılar: accelerometer, proximity sensor, digital compass, ambient light sensor
Network
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, LTE (4G), UMTS (3G), EDGE, GSM (2G) LTE/4G (800/1800/2600 MHz), HSPA+ 42 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s, UMTS (850/900/1900/2100 MHz), GSM (850/900/1800/1900MHz) Cat. 4 (150 Mbps/50 Mbps), WiFi-Direct, LTE, GPS
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 7.7 x 142 x 72
Batarya
2050 mAh Lithium-Ion, Konuşma süresi 2G (üreticiye göre): 6 h, Konuşma süresi 3G (üreticiye göre): 10 h, Bekleme modu 2G (üreticiye göre): 340 h, Bekleme modu 3G (üreticiye göre): 340 h
İşletim sistemi
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Webcam: f2.0 aperture
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f2.2 aperture
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f2.0 aperture
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: rear-sided mono speaker, Klavye: virtual, 24 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
144 g, Güç kaynağı: 53 g
Fiyat
250 Euro
Bağlantılar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

LG's new Class...
LG's new Class...
...is characterized by...
...classy looks...
...and premium...
...selection of materials.
Unfortunately, it has...
...weaknesses in...
...build.
146.9 mm 70.9 mm 8.19 mm 137 g142.1 mm 72.4 mm 11.6 mm 155 g142.1 mm 71.8 mm 7.9 mm 147 g142 mm 72 mm 7.7 mm 144 g140.5 mm 70.3 mm 8.6 mm 131 g142 mm 69.5 mm 6.8 mm 120 g140 mm 69 mm 6.9 mm 138 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
LG Class
LG Class
LG Class
LG Class
LG Class
LG Class
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
496
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 518 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 492.4 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 91 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 518 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1016:1 (Siyah: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.67 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.19
LG Class
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Allview E4
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
-20%
5%
-1%
3%
Brightness middle
518
312
-40%
418
-19%
349
-33%
534
3%
Brightness
492
314
-36%
407
-17%
353
-28%
503
2%
Brightness Distribution
91
91
0%
95
4%
93
2%
82
-10%
Black Level *
0.51
0.49
4%
0.57
-12%
Contrast
1016
853
-16%
937
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.41
6.28
-16%
3.92
28%
5.22
4%
5.65
-4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.76
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.67
8.24
-7%
3.81
50%
3.96
48%
3.69
52%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.12 104%
2.27 97%
2.08 106%
2.15 102%
CCT
8521 76%
8145 80%
7361 88%
7308 89%
7289 89%

* ... smaller is better

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Class
5.2 fps
Allview E4
20 fps +285%
OnePlus X
23 fps +342%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
9.5 fps +83%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
17 fps +227%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Class
9.8 fps
Allview E4
12 fps +22%
OnePlus X
21 fps +114%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5.3 fps -46%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
12 fps +22%
GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Class
1.8 fps
Allview E4
4.2 fps +133%
OnePlus X
8.6 fps +378%
Samsung Galaxy J5
1.8 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1.7 fps -6%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG Class
4.1 fps
Allview E4
8.6 fps +110%
OnePlus X
10 fps +144%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3.8 fps -7%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3.7 fps -10%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Class
1442 Points
OnePlus X
2570 Points +78%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1563 Points +8%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
2395 Points +66%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Class
482 Points
OnePlus X
913 Points +89%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
528 Points +10%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
435 Points -10%
3DMark - 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
LG Class
5295 Points
Allview E4
8133 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy J5
5227 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5298 Points 0%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
7005 Points +32%

Legend

 
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 626G dual sim Mediatek MT6592, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 8 GB eMMC Flash
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
LG Class
3803 Points
Allview E4
3841 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3966 Points +4%
OnePlus X
4450 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3701 Points -3%
BaseMark OS II - Overall (sort by value)
LG Class
561 Points
Allview E4
823 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy J5
534 Points -5%
OnePlus X
1252 Points +123%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
515 Points -8%
ZTE Blade V6
687 Points +22%

Legend

 
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
LG Class
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
ZTE Blade V6
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
9%
47%
51%
15%
Sequential Read 256KB
128.6
131.4
2%
269.3
109%
235.5
83%
145.5
13%
Sequential Write 256KB
74.1
22.33
-70%
37.37
-50%
49.31
-33%
39.4
-47%
Random Read 4KB
9.67
22.79
136%
27.08
180%
16.31
69%
19.25
99%
Random Write 4KB
7.7
5.11
-34%
3.66
-52%
14.22
85%
7.2
-6%
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
LG Class
1415 ms *
Allview E4
1606 ms * -13%
OnePlus X
1509 ms * -7%
Samsung Galaxy J5
1022 ms * +28%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1573 ms * -11%
ZTE Blade V6
1692 ms * -20%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
1086 ms * +23%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG Class
3028 Points
Allview E4
3177 Points +5%
OnePlus X
4810 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3038 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3296 Points +9%
ZTE Blade V6
2978 Points -2%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
2432 Points -20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
LG Class
13980 ms *
Allview E4
13149 ms * +6%
OnePlus X
7264 ms * +48%
Samsung Galaxy J5
14074 ms * -1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
11843 ms * +15%
ZTE Blade V6
25141 ms * -80%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
19205 ms * -37%
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
LG Class
2979 Points
Allview E4
3042 Points +2%
OnePlus X
5328 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy J5
2760 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3125 Points +5%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
LG Class
57 Points
Allview E4
59 Points +4%
OnePlus X
85 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy J5
52 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
52 Points -9%

Legend

 
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 626G dual sim Mediatek MT6592, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 8 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Maksimum yük
 32.8 °C36.8 °C37.7 °C 
 32.2 °C35.2 °C38.6 °C 
 31.5 °C33.2 °C36.4 °C 
Maksimum: 38.6 °C
Ortalama: 34.9 °C
34.3 °C35 °C32.9 °C
34.5 °C34.9 °C30.7 °C
34.1 °C34.4 °C20 °C
Maksimum: 35 °C
Ortalama: 32.3 °C
Güç kaynağı  34.4 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Anlık tüketim
Boştadarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.9 / 2.2 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 3.1 / 5.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 940
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
16h 16min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 28min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
3h 16min
LG Class
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
Mali-450 MP4, MT6592, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Allview E4
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
-5%
23%
28%
-18%
H.264
628
495
-21%
677
8%
514
-18%
456
-27%
WiFi v1.3
422
398
-6%
526
25%
549
30%
315
-25%
Load
196
220
12%
264
35%
339
73%
193
-2%

Artılar

+ Klas tasarım
+ Aluminyum arka kapak
+ Genişletilebilir bellek
+ Ekran parlaklığı

Eksiler

- Ses kalitesi daha iyi olabilir
- Hoparlör
- Yapım zayıflıkları
- Batarya çıkarılamıyor
In review: LG Class. Test model courtesy of LG Germany
In review: LG Class. Test model courtesy of LG Germany

LG'nin yeni Class cihazını test ediyoruz. Kasanın aluminyum kapağı elegant ve sağlam bir izlenim bırakıyor. Malesef mükemmellikten bahsedemiyoruz. Birçok ufak noktada tutarlılıktan yoksun. Yine de bu fiyat aralığında sadece birkaç rakip bu kalitede. Bir telefonun gerçek kullanımının sadece konuşma olduğunu unutmamak gerekir. Bu yüzden daha iyi ses ve mikrofonu gelecek versiyonlarda görmek istiyoruz. Ekranın parlaklığı iyi bir sonuç veriyor.

Donanım orta sınıfa uygun ve beklenilen sonuçları veriyor. Batarya süreleri konusunda ise oldukça ortalama.

 

Genel olarak LG'nin klası olması gerektiği gibi. Güçlü bir orta sınıf akıllı telefon.

Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.

LG Class - 01/05/2016 v4.1(old)
Nino Ricchizzi

İşcilik
87%
Klavye
68 / 75 → 91%
Mouse
92%
Bağlanılabilirlik
44 / 60 → 73%
Ağırlık
93%
Batarya
91%
Görüntü
84%
Oyun performansı
54 / 63 → 86%
Uygulama performansı
29 / 70 → 41%
Isınma
89%
Ses
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
67%
Ortalama
73%
84%
Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Kısa inceleme: LG Class (H650E) akıllı telefon
Nino Ricchizzi, 2016-02- 5 (Update: 2016-02- 5)