Notebookcheck

Kısa inceleme: MSI WT72-6QME Workstation

Bernie Pechlaner, 02/05/2016

Profesyoneller için güç canavarı. MSI'ın WT72 modeli Skylake Xeon işlemci ve daha güçlü Nvidia Quadro grafik kartları ile güçlendirilmiş. Diğer bileşenler ise neredeyse aynı.

MSI WT72-6QM (WT72 Seri)
İşlemci
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8 GHz
Grafik kartı
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M - 8192 MB, 10.18.13.5396, manuell
Bellek
32768 MB 
, DDR4
Görüntü
17.3 inç 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel, no, LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1, IPS, parlak: hayır
Anakart
Intel CM236 (Skylake PCH-H)
Harddisk
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, 256 GB 
, 128GB*2 SSD (PCIe Gen3x4)
Ses kartı
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Bağlantılar
6 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: Mikrofon + Kopfhörer, Kart okuyucular: SD (XC/HC)
Network
Killer e2400 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Optik okuyucu
Matshita BD-MLT UJ272
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 48 x 428 x 293.3
Batarya
86580 mAh Lithium-Ion, 9 Zellen
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 1080p FullHD
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: Dynaudio Tech Speakers 3W*2 + Subwoofer*1, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, 24 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
3.852 kg, Güç kaynağı: 1.072 kg
Fiyat
5000 USD

 

290
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
309
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 309 cd/m² Ortalama: 297.7 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 94 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 301 cd/m²
Kontrast: 659:1 (Siyah: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.77 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.87 | - Ø
85.27% sRGB (Argyll) 56.04% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 1.99
MSI WT72-6QM
17.3, 1920x1080
Bullman E-Klasse 5
17.3, 1920x1080
Dell Precision M6800
17.3, 1920x1080
HP ZBook 17 E9X11AA-ABA
17.3, 1920x1080
Schenker Technologies XMG U705
17.3, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
17.3, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad P70
17.3, 3840x2160
Response Times
51%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42
44
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
26
27.6
-6%
PWM Frequency
86
228
165%
Screen
14%
-42%
32%
15%
-59%
15%
Brightness
298
335
12%
247
-17%
311
4%
317
6%
295
-1%
341
14%
Brightness Distribution
94
89
-5%
83
-12%
88
-6%
86
-9%
87
-7%
85
-10%
Black Level *
0.46
0.44
4%
0.477
-4%
0.359
22%
0.3
35%
0.822
-79%
0.4
13%
Contrast
659
807
22%
524
-20%
891
35%
1110
68%
384
-42%
913
39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.77
3.73
35%
11.4
-98%
2.04
65%
5.24
9%
12.21
-112%
3.8
34%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.87
2.84
42%
12.97
-166%
2.45
50%
4.33
11%
13.4
-175%
6.09
-25%
Gamma
1.99 121%
2.12 113%
2.65 91%
2.28 105%
2.14 112%
2.39 100%
2.3 104%
CCT
7363 88%
6457 101%
18595 35%
6518 100%
6437 101%
19530 33%
6332 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
56.04
55.45
-1%
68
21%
93
66%
55
-2%
59
5%
76.01
36%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
85.27
84.39
-1%
100
17%
83.3
-2%
99.97
17%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
14% / 14%
-42% / -42%
32% / 32%
15% / 15%
-59% / -59%
33% / 25%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 276 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 86 Hz10 % brightness setting
15 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 86 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % (15 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 86 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 655 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 28740) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
1.77 Points ∼22%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
1.54 Points ∼19% -13%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
1.95 Points ∼24% +10%
Dell Precision M6800
1.55 Points ∼19% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
7.85 Points ∼44%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
7.11 Points ∼40% -9%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
9.14 Points ∼52% +16%
Dell Precision M6800
5.49 Points ∼31% -30%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
157 Points ∼83%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
135 Points ∼71% -14%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
174 Points ∼92% +11%
Dell Precision M6800
139 Points ∼73% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
724 Points ∼44%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
657 Points ∼40% -9%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
843 Points ∼51% +16%
Dell Precision M6800
529 Points ∼32% -27%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - --- (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
528.8 Seconds * ∼2%
Dell Precision M6800
534 Seconds * ∼2% -1%

Legend

 
MSI WT72-6QM Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
 
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET Intel Core i7-4710MQ, AMD FirePro M6100, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
 
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Intel Core i7-4790K, NVIDIA Quadro K3100M, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
 
Dell Precision M6800 Intel Core i7-4800MQ, NVIDIA Quadro K3100M, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
8529 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
27938 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
7421 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8525
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
21475
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5627
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
94.97 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.85 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.77 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
109.55 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
724 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
157 Points
Yardım
PCMark 7 Score
6657 puan
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4731 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5655 puan
Yardım
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Maksimum transfer hızı: 71.7 MB/s
Minimum transfer hızı: 153.4 MB/s
Ortlama transfer hızı: 114.8 MB/s
Erişim hızı: 15.4 ms
Yakma hızı: 309.7 MB/s
İşlemci kullanımı: 3 %
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
11110 Points ∼44%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
6167 Points ∼24% -44%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
4074 Points ∼16% -63%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
3662 Points ∼14% -67%
MSI GT72S 6QF
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF NVMe (RAID 0)
12645 Points ∼50% +14%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
7979 Points ∼34%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
3579 Points ∼15% -55%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
3644 Points ∼16% -54%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
2731 Points ∼12% -66%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
2259 Points ∼10% -72%
MSI GT72S 6QF
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF NVMe (RAID 0)
11066 Points ∼47% +39%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
22786 Points ∼62%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
17342 Points ∼47% -24%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
16199 Points ∼44% -29%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
15497 Points ∼42% -32%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
12079 Points ∼33% -47%
MSI GT72S 6QF
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF NVMe (RAID 0)
25302 Points ∼69% +11%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
137273 Points ∼69%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
126937 Points ∼64% -8%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
123260 Points ∼62% -10%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
118906 Points ∼60% -13%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
81160 Points ∼41% -41%
MSI GT72S 6QF
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF NVMe (RAID 0)
125241 Points ∼63% -9%
3DMark 06 Standard
29317 puan
3DMark 11 Performance
11110 puan
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
137273 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22786 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7979 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
4205 puan
Yardım
SPECviewperf 11
1920x1080 Siemens NX (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
61.76 fps ∼55%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
45 fps ∼40% -27%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
47.84 fps ∼43% -23%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
39 fps ∼35% -37%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
38.53 fps ∼35% -38%
1920x1080 Tcvis (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
55.94 fps ∼94%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
50 fps ∼84% -11%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
28.37 fps ∼48% -49%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
42 fps ∼70% -25%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
41.83 fps ∼70% -25%
1920x1080 SolidWorks (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
49.26 fps ∼67%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
54 fps ∼73% +10%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
68.72 fps ∼93% +40%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
52 fps ∼70% +6%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
48.25 fps ∼65% -2%
1920x1080 Pro/ENGINEER (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
17.87 fps ∼74%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
24 fps ∼100% +34%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
10.66 fps ∼44% -40%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
21 fps ∼88% +18%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
18.27 fps ∼76% +2%
1920x1080 Maya (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
71.59 fps ∼58%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
58 fps ∼47% -19%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
99.72 fps ∼80% +39%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
55 fps ∼44% -23%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
54.89 fps ∼44% -23%
1920x1080 Lightwave (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
59.58 fps ∼71%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
53 fps ∼63% -11%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
77.78 fps ∼93% +31%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
56 fps ∼67% -6%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
50.95 fps ∼61% -14%
1920x1080 Ensight (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
73.98 fps ∼43%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
52 fps ∼30% -30%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
55.74 fps ∼33% -25%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
39 fps ∼23% -47%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
34.18 fps ∼20% -54%
1920x1080 Catia (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
55.25 fps ∼67%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
57 fps ∼69% +3%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
49.28 fps ∼60% -11%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
47 fps ∼57% -15%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
50.34 fps ∼61% -9%
SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
101.01 fps ∼70%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
83 fps ∼58% -18%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
66.53 fps ∼46% -34%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
62 fps ∼43% -39%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
86.87 fps ∼68%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
45 fps ∼35% -48%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
50.73 fps ∼40% -42%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
32 fps ∼25% -63%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
44.14 fps ∼35%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
23 fps ∼18% -48%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
26.31 fps ∼21% -40%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
19 fps ∼15% -57%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
31.35 fps ∼52%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
14 fps ∼23% -55%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
16.27 fps ∼27% -48%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
10 fps ∼17% -68%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
69.57 fps ∼43%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
39 fps ∼24% -44%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
39.17 fps ∼24% -44%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
28 fps ∼17% -60%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
6.86 fps ∼12%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
2.12 fps ∼4% -69%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
0.59 fps ∼1% -91%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
2.1 fps ∼4% -69%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
81.34 fps ∼74%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
38 fps ∼35% -53%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
42.61 fps ∼39% -48%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
29 fps ∼26% -64%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
94.45 fps ∼69%
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
48 fps ∼35% -49%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
44.02 fps ∼32% -53%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
33 fps ∼24% -65%
düşük orta yüksek ultra
Dirt 3 (2011) 211202.7171.4158.2fps
Hitman: Absolution (2012) 83.575.967.250.3fps
Tomb Raider (2013) 406.8319.6227.9107fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 127.5125.3104.360.8fps
GRID 2 (2013) 176.3145.6134.5102.7fps
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) 53.45251.434.4fps
Thief (2014) 97.692.389.480.5fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) 167.8143.287.463.6fps

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta
33.3 / 33.4 / 33.5 dB
DVD
34 / dB
Çalışırken
38.8 / 40.2 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
sessiz
40 dB(A)
duyulabilirlik
50 dB(A)
gürültülü
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm uzaklık)
Maksimum yük
 32.4 °C40.6 °C34.8 °C 
 28.8 °C35.2 °C28.8 °C 
 23.6 °C22.8 °C25.6 °C 
Maksimum: 40.6 °C
Ortalama: 30.3 °C
42.6 °C34 °C34.4 °C
25.4 °C22.2 °C23 °C
22.8 °C23.2 °C23.8 °C
Maksimum: 42.6 °C
Ortalama: 27.9 °C
Güç kaynağı  46 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 19 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
MSI WT72-6QM
87 Wh
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
75 Wh
Bullman E-Klasse 5
83 Wh
Dell Precision M6800
97 Wh
Schenker Technologies XMG U705
82 Wh
Battery Runtime
-49%
-30%
9%
-24%
Reader / Idle
413
162
-61%
166
-60%
492
19%
138
-67%
Load
76
49
-36%
85
12%
75
-1%
91
20%
WiFi
149
352
WiFi v1.3
245
144
-41%
Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
6h 53min
WLAN açıkken v1.3
4h 05min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
1h 16min

Artılar

+ Çok iyi genel CAD/3D performansı
+ Harika sıcaklık yönetimi
+ USB Type-C
+ Bakımı kolay
+ Makul IPS ekran

Eksiler

- Pahalı sayılır
- Büyük ve ağır
- Grafik kartı değişimi yeniden başlatma gerektiriyor
- Performans bataryada oldukça kısıtlı
- Renk aralığı daha iyi olabilirid
- Oyun cihazı tabanlı

WT72-6QME çalışma istasyonu ile MSI zaten iyi olan bir cihazı sağlam bir güncelleme ile daha iyi bir ürün haline getirmiş. Xeon E3-1505M işlemcinin performansı çok muazzam olmasa da, ECC RAM desteği sunuyor. Güvenilirlik söz konusu olunca, RAID 0 bir oyun cihazı için çok mantıklı olabiecekken hata önleme mekanizmasının stabilite ve sağlamlığın önemli olduğu bir sistemde olmamasını biraz sorguluyoruz. Orjinalinde oyun için tasarlandığından oldukça iyi tasarlanmış bir soğutma sistemi mevcut ve tüm gün boyunca yoğun kullanım mümkün. "Cooler Boost" özelliği sistem sesini biraz arttırmakta. Ekran, birçok 17 inç oyun sisteminde kullanılana benzer, oldukça iyi. Ama profesyonel renk aralıklarının daha iyi sunulmasını beklerdik.

 

MSI'ın güncellenmiş WT72 iş istasyonu bu alan için bir kez daha sağlam bir tercih. En üst modelin modifiye edilmiş bir oyun cihazı için biraz fazla pahalı olduğunu da belirtmek gerek.

Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.

MSI WT72-6QM - 03/17/2016 v5
Bernie Pechlaner

İşcilik
83 / 98 → 85%
Klavye
81%
Mouse
89%
Bağlanılabilirlik
68 / 81 → 83%
Ağırlık
51 / 66 → 73%
Batarya
76%
Görüntü
84%
Oyun performansı
99%
Uygulama performansı
98%
Isınma
91 / 95 → 96%
Ses
83 / 90 → 92%
Audio
82%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Ortalama
80%
88%
Workstation - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Kısa inceleme: MSI WT72-6QME Workstation
Bernie Pechlaner, 2016-02- 5 (Update: 2016-02- 5)