Notebookcheck

Kısa inceleme: HP Elite x3 Phablet

İş aracı HP, Windows 10 Mobile ile üst sınıf bir cihaz sunan tek üretici ve bu cihaz sadece iş kullanıcılarını hedefliyor. Geniş ekranının dışında ayrıca güçlü bir batarya, sağlam bir kasa ve HP Workspace ile x86 programları bile kullanma şansı sunuluyor.

HP Elite x3 (ElitePad Seri)
Grafik kartı
Qualcomm Adreno 530, Çekirdek: 624 MHz
Bellek
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Görüntü
5.96 inç 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel 493 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 4, Anti-reflective coating, parlak: evet
Harddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
Bağlantılar
1 USB 3.0, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Portu, Ses çıkışları: combined earphone and microphone port (3.5 mm), Kart okuyucular: microSD up to 2 TB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: distance, pressure, hall, position, acceleration, and G sensors, digital compass, BeiDou, Miracast, Wi-Fi Direct
Network
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260AN (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (bands: 8, 2, 1, 4), LTE Cat. 6 (bands: 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 7.8 x 161.8 x 83.5
Batarya
15.98 Wh, 4150 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3.85 V, max. 64 g, one cell, wireless charging (Qi standard), Konuşma süresi 3G (üreticiye göre): 33 h, Bekleme modu 3G (üreticiye göre): 500 h
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix (plus 2.4 MP Iris camera)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: 2x 0.6 W Bang & Olufsen speaker, charger, USB cable, documentation, HP Work Space, HP All-in-One Remote, HP Device Hub, Continuum, 24 Ay Garanti, USB Type-C, iris scanner, IP67, MIL-STD 810G, fanless
Ağırlık
195 g, Güç kaynağı: 101 g
Fiyat
899 Euro
Bağlantılar

 

Size Comparison

Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
HP Elite x3
HP Elite x3
HP Elite x3
HP Elite x3
HP Elite x3
HP Elite x3

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
1) HP Lap Dock 2) HP Elite x3
255
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
268
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
256
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
HP Lap Dock
Maksimum: 268 cd/m² Ortalama: 256.8 cd/m² Minimum: 7.68 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 92 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 268 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1072:1 (Siyah: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.12
357
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
HP Elite x3
Maksimum: 357 cd/m² Ortalama: 336.4 cd/m² Minimum: 11.47 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 90 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 333 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Siyah: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.12

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 357.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 357.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 357.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
115867 Points ∼51%
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points ∼54% +7%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
94122 Points ∼41% -19%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼57% +12%
LG G6
151751 Points ∼67% +31%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
165399 Points ∼73% +43%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼73% +43%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
47.19 fps ∼4%
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps ∼6% +70%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
27.11 fps ∼2% -43%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼6% +63%
LG G6
75 fps ∼6% +59%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
91.96 fps ∼7% +95%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼8% +120%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
26.42 fps ∼6%
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps ∼13% +127%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
18.75 fps ∼4% -29%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼12% +101%
LG G6
46 fps ∼10% +74%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
57.71 fps ∼13% +118%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼13% +120%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps ∼6%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
17.54 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼8%
LG G6
38 fps ∼7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
58.71 fps ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps ∼10%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
11.81 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼7%
LG G6
27 fps ∼7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
55.17 fps ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼10%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
34.02 fps ∼8%
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps ∼6% -29%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼6% -21%
LG G6
29 fps ∼7% -15%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.3 fps ∼10% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼10% +23%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
16.09 fps ∼9%
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps ∼16% +74%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼9% -7%
LG G6
16 fps ∼9% -1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.5 fps ∼24% +158%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼13% +43%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
458 Points ∼30%
Huawei Mate 9
1076 Points ∼70% +135%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
837 Points ∼54% +83%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼62% +109%
LG G6
1073 Points ∼70% +134%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1542 Points ∼100% +237%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼75% +154%
Graphics (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
3974 Points ∼46%
Huawei Mate 9
3939 Points ∼46% -1%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2040 Points ∼24% -49%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼50% +9%
LG G6
5138 Points ∼60% +29%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6875 Points ∼80% +73%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼71% +54%
Memory (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
2003 Points ∼45%
Huawei Mate 9
3850 Points ∼87% +92%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1945 Points ∼44% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼50% +9%
LG G6
1930 Points ∼44% -4%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1319 Points ∼30% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼71% +57%
System (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
1384 Points ∼21%
Huawei Mate 9
3616 Points ∼55% +161%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1386 Points ∼21% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼52% +146%
LG G6
3646 Points ∼55% +163%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6582 Points ∼100% +376%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼81% +284%
Overall (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
1499 Points ∼40%
Huawei Mate 9
2772 Points ∼73% +85%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1465 Points ∼39% -2%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼62% +57%
LG G6
2496 Points ∼66% +67%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3097 Points ∼82% +107%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼87% +120%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
8664 Points ∼17%
Huawei Mate 9
11897 Points ∼24% +37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
8059 Points ∼16% -7%
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points ∼16% -10%
LG G6
9113 Points ∼18% +5%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
26053 Points ∼53% +201%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
14050 Points ∼28% +62%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
130 Points ∼17%
Huawei Mate 9
152 Points ∼20% +17%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
113 Points ∼15% -13%
Lenovo Moto Z
112 Points ∼15% -14%
LG G6
122 Points ∼16% -6%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
204 Points ∼27% +57%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
154 Points ∼20% +18%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
4398.3 ms * ∼7%
Huawei Mate 9
2733.7 ms * ∼5% +38%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
5552.9 ms * ∼9% -26%
Lenovo Moto Z
3154.7 ms * ∼5% +28%
LG G6
2464.2 ms * ∼4% +44%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1102.7 ms * ∼2% +75%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2236.7 ms * ∼4% +49%

Legend

 
HP Elite x3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

* ... smaller is better

Maksimum yük
 44 °C37.8 °C35.1 °C 
 37.6 °C37.9 °C34.8 °C 
 37 °C36.9 °C34.2 °C 
Maksimum: 44 °C
Ortalama: 37.3 °C
34.2 °C35.5 °C37.1 °C
33.9 °C35.5 °C37.3 °C
33.2 °C35.3 °C36.1 °C
Maksimum: 37.3 °C
Ortalama: 35.3 °C
Güç kaynağı  42.9 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.42525.436.93125.327.74032.928.95033.632.16331.631.38028.428.51002724.712520.830.51602237.520021.343.525020.847.331521.252.740019.458.350019.563.663017.768.580017.971.1100017.872125017.374.7160017.474.8200016.773.8250017.272.9315018.266.3400017.962500017.657.5630017.761.2800017.861.71000017.9601250018.156.91600018.256.8SPL3082.5N1.347.8median 17.9HP Elite x3median 61.2Delta1.39.531.635.725.424.825.324.932.925.633.635.131.630.128.423.32724.820.828.72235.521.343.320.849.321.253.719.455.119.56017.763.317.961.917.863.517.367.117.461.116.77017.272.618.274.117.976.217.675.717.773.917.871.517.972.518.166.718.254.13083.91.353.7median 17.9Huawei Mate 9median 63.31.310.726.428.426.42826.72825.828.725.829.133.229.126.12626.123.925.523.927.724.727.733.426.933.441.53741.540.320.240.343.720.243.745.521.845.547224752.822.252.860.121.860.166.517.266.569.217.869.271.619.871.669.919.169.96815.46869.515.669.56614.96671.514.771.571.214.271.272.21472.271.213.971.26713.86758.913.958.952.413.952.454.713.754.781.529.581.549.91.349.9median 66Apple iPhone 7 Plusmedian 17.2median 6610.93.810.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Elite x3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.46 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei Mate 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.06 / 0.27 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 0.86 / 1.46 / 1.59 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 8.1 / 9.35 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Elite x3
4150 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Power Consumption
-90%
-4%
31%
11%
-4%
29%
Idle Minimum *
0.86
2.85
-231%
0.78
9%
0.68
21%
0.62
28%
0.77
10%
0.66
23%
Idle Average *
1.46
2.95
-102%
2.13
-46%
1.13
23%
1.43
2%
2.04
-40%
1.01
31%
Idle Maximum *
1.59
3.26
-105%
2.17
-36%
1.16
27%
1.48
7%
2.24
-41%
1.09
31%
Load Average *
8.1
8.92
-10%
6.32
22%
4.69
42%
5.52
32%
4.69
42%
3.97
51%
Load Maximum *
9.35
9.39
-0%
6.49
31%
5.24
44%
10.47
-12%
8.66
7%
8.34
11%

* ... smaller is better

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
36h 45min
WLAN açıkken v1.3
7h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 40min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
3h 05min
HP Elite x3
4150 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Battery Runtime
-22%
23%
23%
13%
21%
7%
Reader / Idle
2205
1078
-51%
1538
-30%
1565
-29%
1835
-17%
1789
-19%
1371
-38%
H.264
760
611
-20%
947
25%
742
-2%
813
7%
779
3%
724
-5%
WiFi v1.3
422
369
-13%
758
80%
736
74%
587
39%
692
64%
407
-4%
Load
185
179
-3%
219
18%
275
49%
225
22%
252
36%
320
73%

Artılar

+ Hızlı sistem çipi
+ Harika ses kalitesi
+ Sağlam tasarım
+ Geniş AMOLED ekran
+ Genişletilebilir depolama alanı
+ DisplayPort/HDMI ile USB 3.1
+ Göz ve parmak izi okuyucu
+ İş odaklı
+ Geniş batarya

Eksiler

- Yoğun kullanımda yükselen güç tüketimi
In the test: HP Elite x3. Test unit provided by HP Germany.
In the test: HP Elite x3. Test unit provided by HP Germany.

HP Elite x3 büyük bir phablet, bu yüzden HP cihazı tablet olarak pazarlıyor. Fonksiyonel ve sağlam bir tasarıma sahip. Sağlık, lojistik, pos sektörlerini ve genel olarak hızlı data erişimine ihtiyaç duyan mobil çalışanları hedefliyor denebilir.

Cihaz, sadece akıllı telefon olmanın dışında Lap Dock ile bazı kısıtlamalarla bir laptop olarak bile kullanılabilmekte. Testlerimiz esnasında harika bir sonuç alamasak da, kullanım yönünden avantajlar sunduğu kesin.

HP Elite x3 tam anlamıyla herhangi bir eksikliğe sahip değil. Güvenlik özelliklerini, güvenli sayılabilecek Windows 10 Mobile platformu ile birleştiriyor. İşletim sistemi tüketici segmentinde çok etki sahibi olmasa da küçük işletmeler için cihazlarını mevcut altyapılarına entegre edebilmeleri adına bir kolaylık. 

İş için değil de tamamen kişisel zevkiniz için bu cihazı düşünüyorsanız, tam bir Windows fanı olmanız gerekli.

Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.

HP Elite x3 - 06/02/2017 v6
Daniel Schmidt

İşcilik
90%
Klavye
75 / 75 → 99%
Mouse
96%
Bağlanılabilirlik
64 / 60 → 100%
Ağırlık
88%
Batarya
91%
Görüntü
80%
Oyun performansı
52 / 63 → 83%
Uygulama performansı
53 / 70 → 75%
Isınma
88%
Ses
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 84%
Camera
72%
Ortalama
79%
86%
Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Kısa inceleme: HP Elite x3 Phablet
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-06-13 (Update: 2017-06-13)