Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarKısa inceleme: HP EliteBook 840 G4 (7200U, Full HD) Laptop
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD (jseb) | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD (jseb) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aydınlatma: 86 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 346 cd/m²
Kontrast: 402:1 (Siyah: 0.86 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.64 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 11.24 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
80% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
52% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.62
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD AUO123D, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 B140QAN01.5, , 2560x1440, 14.00 | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 LG LP140WF3, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 AUO1136, , 2560x1440, 14.00 | HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD Chi Mei CMN14C0, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -24% | 21% | 10% | 21% | -11% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 55.8 | 41.6 -25% | 69 24% | 66.1 18% | 67.9 22% | 48.93 -12% |
| sRGB Coverage | 80.7 | 61.9 -23% | 95.1 18% | 84.8 5% | 96.8 20% | 73.7 -9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 57.7 | 43.06 -25% | 69.6 21% | 62 7% | 70 21% | 50.5 -12% |
| Response Times | -28% | -22% | 4% | -17% | -10% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ? | 41.6 ? -7% | 46.4 ? -19% | 36 ? 8% | 46.4 ? -19% | 43 ? -10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 34 ? -48% | 28.8 ? -25% | 23.2 ? -1% | 26.4 ? -15% | 25 ? -9% |
| PWM Frequency | 204 ? | |||||
| Screen | 23% | 39% | 33% | 38% | 4% | |
| Brightness middle | 346 | 306 -12% | 327 -5% | 291 -16% | 327 -5% | 366 6% |
| Brightness | 317 | 287 -9% | 311 -2% | 296 -7% | 316 0% | 336 6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 88 2% | 88 2% | 84 -2% | 87 1% | 87 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.86 | 0.3 65% | 0.25 71% | 0.32 63% | 0.35 59% | 0.65 24% |
| Contrast | 402 | 1020 154% | 1308 225% | 909 126% | 934 132% | 563 40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.64 | 6.2 28% | 6.1 29% | 4.3 50% | 4.39 49% | 10.26 -19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.58 | 13.6 -0% | 12.2 10% | 7.5 45% | 7.27 46% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 11.24 | 5.8 48% | 8.8 22% | 4.3 62% | 4.69 58% | 11.51 -2% |
| Gamma | 2.62 84% | 2.04 108% | 2.18 101% | 2.31 95% | 2.15 102% | 2.4 92% |
| CCT | 12530 52% | 6277 104% | 6172 105% | 6529 100% | 7101 92% | 12725 51% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 52 | 39.62 -24% | 61.56 18% | 55.46 7% | 62.52 20% | 47 -10% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 80 | 61.44 -23% | 94.88 19% | 84.77 6% | 96.71 21% | 74 -7% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
7% | 13% /
27% | 16% /
25% | 14% /
27% | -6% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | ||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3486 puan | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4352 puan | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4572 puan | |
Yardım | ||
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -10% | 12% | -50% | 9% | -56% | |
| Read Seq | 1819 | 1155 -37% | 1760 -3% | 504 -72% | 1649 -9% | 497.8 -73% |
| Write Seq | 1263 | 1076 -15% | 1666 32% | 497.8 -61% | 1265 0% | 241.4 -81% |
| Read 512 | 922 | 811 -12% | 832 -10% | 396.7 -57% | 1252 36% | 396 -57% |
| Write 512 | 804 | 862 7% | 1064 32% | 283.4 -65% | 1244 55% | 241.8 -70% |
| Read 4k | 61.4 | 55.5 -10% | 53.2 -13% | 35.73 -42% | 53.3 -13% | 27.02 -56% |
| Write 4k | 157.1 | 134.6 -14% | 167.4 7% | 87.8 -44% | 159.9 2% | 82.6 -47% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 513 | 496.2 -3% | 630 23% | 399.1 -22% | 559 9% | 388.5 -24% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 410.2 | 425.4 4% | 533 30% | 249.7 -39% | 376.7 -8% | 242.8 -41% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1525 puan | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 50497 puan | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5621 puan | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 697 puan | |
Yardım | ||
| düşük | orta | yüksek | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 40.5 | 24.3 | 19.8 | 6.4 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 30.7 | 24.5 | 15.7 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 12.9 |
Ses yüksekliği
| Boşta |
| 31 / 31 / 31 dB |
| Çalışırken |
| 33.5 / 33.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 31 dB(A) | ||
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620 | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 6% | -2% | 8% | 3% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 31 | 28 10% | 28.9 7% | 28.2 9% | 29.1 6% | 31.2 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31 | 28 10% | 28.9 7% | 28.2 9% | 29.1 6% | 31.2 -1% |
| Idle Average * | 31 | 28 10% | 28.9 7% | 28.2 9% | 29.1 6% | 32.1 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31 | 29.4 5% | 30.1 3% | 28.2 9% | 29.1 6% | 33.1 -7% |
| Load Average * | 33.5 | 31.4 6% | 39.2 -17% | 31.2 7% | 32.6 3% | 36.2 -8% |
| Load Maximum * | 33.7 | 34.6 -3% | 39.2 -16% | 33 2% | 37.8 -12% | 37.8 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+0.3 °C / 0.6 F).
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Kapalı / Bekleme modu | 0.52 / 0.72 Watt |
| Boşta | 2.9 / 5.6 / 8.15 Watt |
| Çalışırken |
30.6 / 31 Watt |
   
| |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 2560x1440, 14.00 | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 2560x1440, 14.00 | HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -44% | -19% | -56% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.9 | 3.21 -11% | 4.64 -60% | 4.11 -42% | 6.3 -117% | 3.8 -31% |
| Idle Average * | 5.6 | 6.15 -10% | 8.93 -59% | 7.87 -41% | 9.4 -68% | 6.3 -13% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.15 | 6.82 16% | 9.12 -12% | 8.74 -7% | 10.1 -24% | 6.8 17% |
| Load Average * | 30.6 | 28.5 7% | 42.2 -38% | 30.2 1% | 33.3 -9% | 34.4 -12% |
| Load Maximum * | 31 | 34.5 -11% | 47.3 -53% | 32.4 -5% | 49.5 -60% | 28.3 9% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 45.6 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 46 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -19% | -33% | -28% | -43% | -18% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1155 | 787 -32% | 782 -32% | 530 -54% | 1020 -12% | |
| H.264 | 591 | 623 5% | 454 -23% | 490 -17% | 339 -43% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 571 | 438 -23% | 417 -27% | 430 -25% | 309 -46% | 453 -21% |
| Load | 184 | 110 -40% | 93 -49% | 117 -36% | 131 -29% | 146 -21% |
Artılar
Eksiler
Yeni HP EliteBook 840 G4 eski G3 modelinin aslında sadece Kaby Lake güncellemesi. Boyut, kasa kalitesi vs. gibi tüm bileşenler halen rekabete karşı iyi durumda. Sadece ekran menteşelerinden gelen çıtırdama sesleri ve harici touchpad tuşlarının sesleri genel izlenimi biraz etkiliyor. Bileşenlere erişim bir diğer pozitif nokta. RAM güncellemesi oldukça kolay. Arayüzler, özellikle klavye oldukça hoş.
14 inçlik iş cihazı performans ve emisyonlar konusunda hayal kırıklığı yaratmıyor. Sessiz ve çok ısınmıyor. Intel Core i5-7200U işlemci performans potansiyelini iyi kullanıyor. HP, batarya kapasitesini de arttırdığından 10 saatlik kullanımları görmek mümkün.
İyi kasa, yeterli performans, düşük emisyonlar. HP EliteBook 840 modekinin 4. jenerasyonu çok iyi bir iş cihazı olabilir. Ancak TN ekran en iyi olmasını engelliyor.
HP'nin EliteBook modelini çok az güncellediğini bağlantı noktalarından da anlamak mümkün. Gerekli tüm bağlantı noktalarına sahip olsanız da geleceğe yönelik Thunderbolt 3 gibi bağlantı noktaları yok.
Ama en büyük sorun Full HD TN ekran. Çözünürlük ve aydınlatma sorun olmasa da diğer noktalarda büyük bir hayal kırıklığı. Sınırlı bakış açıları en büyük sorun. Böylesi bir cihazda bu tür bir ekran kullanılmamalıydı. Eğer EliteBook 840 modeliyle ilgileniyorsanız kesinlikle IPS modelini almanız gerekir.
Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD
-
05/26/2017 v6(old)
Andreas Osthoff
Pricecompare
