Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarKısa inceleme: Huawei P10 akıllı telefon
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aydınlatma: 86 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 547 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1272:1 (Siyah: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.39
| Huawei P10 LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.10 | Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Huawei P8 IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.10 | Apple iPhone 7 IPS, 1334x750, 4.70 | Sony Xperia XZ IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 8% | 3% | 21% | 31% | -8% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle | 547 | 582 6% | 453 -17% | 350 -36% | 556 2% | 544 -1% | 445 -19% |
| Brightness | 556 | 563 1% | 439 -21% | 351 -37% | 519 -7% | 521 -6% | 434 -22% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 91 6% | 98 14% | 90 5% | 93 8% | 93 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.38 12% | 0.28 35% | 0.34 21% | 0.37 14% | 0.36 16% | |
| Contrast | 1272 | 1532 20% | 1618 27% | 1635 29% | 1470 16% | 1236 -3% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 4.4 8% | 4.7 2% | 2.04 57% | 1.3 73% | 5.8 -21% | 2.8 42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.8 | 7.4 16% | 3.25 63% | 2.6 70% | 9.8 -11% | 5.8 34% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 4.8 -7% | 5.03 -12% | 1.63 64% | 1.9 58% | 7.2 -60% | 3.7 18% |
| Gamma | 2.39 92% | 2.2 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.07 106% | 2.26 97% | 2.18 101% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 7194 90% | 6175 105% | 7439 87% | 6391 102% | 6818 95% | 8619 75% | 7164 91% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 77.78 | 72.04 | 86.86 | 63.15 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.44 | 99.35 | 99.71 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P10 | Huawei P9 | Lenovo Moto Z | Sony Xperia XZ | HTC 10 | Samsung Galaxy S7 | LG G5 | ZTE Axon 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -49% | -8% | -48% | -20% | -16% | -20% | -13% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 738 | 281.3 -62% | 439.7 -40% | 281 -62% | 275.1 -63% | 483.8 -34% | 427.6 -42% | 406.5 -45% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 189.8 | 72.2 -62% | 168.3 -11% | 138 -27% | 115.6 -39% | 145.7 -23% | 141.3 -26% | 150.9 -20% |
| Random Read 4KB | 168.4 | 39 -77% | 117.2 -30% | 71.5 -58% | 29.92 -82% | 85.9 -49% | 89.3 -47% | 121.1 -28% |
| Random Write 4KB | 152.3 | 47.45 -69% | 74.9 -51% | 10.5 -93% | 15.89 -90% | 16.01 -89% | 16.22 -89% | 16.22 -89% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 54.2 | 55 1% | 78.5 45% | 33.5 -38% | 83.3 54% | 72.3 33% | 78.5 45% | 78.4 45% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 32.19 | 24.83 -23% | 45.64 42% | 29.8 -7% | 65.4 103% | 53.6 67% | 45.53 41% | 51.3 59% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Huawei P10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Kapalı / Bekleme modu |   0.06 / 0.19 Watt |
| Boşta |  0.83 / 2.1 / 2.18 Watt |
| Çalışırken |
6.57 / 9.32 Watt |
    
| |
| Huawei P10 3200 mAh | Huawei P9 3000 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh | Lenovo ZUK Z2 3500 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 5s 3200 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 16% | 8% | 34% | 36% | -1% | 20% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.83 | 0.77 7% | 0.68 18% | 0.68 18% | 0.54 35% | 1.31 -58% | 0.4 52% |
| Idle Average * | 2.1 | 2.36 -12% | 1.49 29% | 1.02 51% | 1.51 28% | 2.03 3% | 1.7 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.18 | 2.37 -9% | 1.91 12% | 1.14 48% | 1.54 29% | 2.08 5% | 1.81 17% |
| Load Average * | 6.57 | 3.09 53% | 7.4 -13% | 4.73 28% | 3.75 43% | 5.45 17% | 5.84 11% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.32 | 5.35 43% | 9.71 -4% | 7.16 23% | 5.01 46% | 6.75 28% | 9.12 2% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P10 3200 mAh | Huawei P9 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Lenovo ZUK Z2 3500 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | 14% | -9% | -12% | -43% | 9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1540 | 1514 -2% | 1810 18% | 1770 15% | 1273 -17% | 1371 -11% | |
| H.264 | 582 | 568 -2% | 892 53% | 722 24% | 648 11% | 724 24% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 966 | 569 -41% | 456 -53% | 517 -46% | 413 -57% | 546 -43% | 407 -58% |
| Load | 176 | 206 17% | 242 38% | 126 -28% | 203 15% | 320 82% |
Artılar
Eksiler
Huawei yine harika bir ürün sunuyor ve P10 lifestyle ürünüyle fazla eleştiriye yer bırakmıyor. Asıl üst sınıf ürünü ise P10 Plus modeli. Yine de daha küçük model birinci sınıf özelliklere sahip. UFS 2.1 depolama alanı, LTE Cat. 12 ve ışık hızında Kirin 960 sistem çipi sadece daha pahalı rakiplerde bulunan özellikler.
Leica'nın çift kamerası beğendiğimiz özelliklerden biri. Teknik olarak halen iyileştirilebilecek gibi dursa da, harika fotoğraflar seçiyor. Dahili portre modu oldukça iyi. Batarya ömrü de iyileştirilmiş.
Huawei'nin P10 modeli iyi kamerası ve geliştirilmiş batarya ömrü ile ileriye dönük bir geliştirme.
Ancak Huawei'nin üst segment bir ürün olduğu düşünüldüğünde bazı eksiklikleri mevcut. Öncelikle zayıf Wi-Fi modülü, yavaş microSD slotu ve sadece Full HD ekranı cihazın giriş yaptığı fiyat segmenti için uygun değil.
Huawei verdiği servis ile de ekstra puan kazanıyor. VIP servis alındığında garanti süresi 3 yıla kadar çıkıyor. Huawei yine harika bir ürün çıkartmış.
Huawei P10
-
07/11/2017 v6(old)
Daniel Schmidt