Notebookcheck

Kısa inceleme: Huawei P10 akıllı telefon

Sıradaki lütfen! 10, 9 dan büyük ve Huawei P10 modelini bu stratejiye göre geliştirmiş. Daha hızlı işlemci, depolama alanı, daha geniş batarya kapasitesi ve daha iyi kamera. Tasarım daha yuvarlak ve parmak izi okuyucu öne taşınmış. Devrimsel bir cihaz olmasa da, Huawei P10 modelinde bir zayıflık görünmüyor.
Huawei P10 (P10 Seri)
İşlemci
HiSilicon Kirin 960 8 x 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Grafik kartı
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Bellek
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Görüntü
5.1 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 432 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, 10 touch points, Knuckle Touch, LTPS, parlak: evet
Harddisk
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 49.66 GB Boş
Bağlantılar
1 USB 2.0, Ses çıkışları: 3.5-mm combo jack, Kart okuyucular: micro-SD max. 256 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: proximity, Hall, accelerometer, position and G sensor, pace counter, digital compass, BeiDou, OTG, Wifi Direct, Miracast
Network
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE Cat. 12 (bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 38, 38, 40 and 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 6.98 x 145.3 x 69.3
Batarya
3200 mAh Lithium-Ion, Huawei SuperCharge, Konuşma süresi 3G (üreticiye göre): 23 h, Bekleme modu 3G (üreticiye göre): 359 h
İşletim sistemi
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix MP monochrome + 12 MP RGB Leica dual-camera (Summarit-H 1:2.2/27 mm ASPH, hybrid zoom, hybrid-AF, OIS, 4K video recording, bi-color LED flash)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix Leica camera (fix focus)
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: mono speaker, Klavye: virtual, charger, USB cable, headset, cover, SIM tool, quick start guide, warranty card, EMUI 5.1, 36 Ay Garanti, USB Type-C, head SAR: 1.49 W/kg, body SAR: 0.54 W/kg, fanless
Ağırlık
144 g, Güç kaynağı: 102 g
Fiyat
599 Euro
Bağlantılar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

148.9 mm 71.9 mm 7.9 mm 163 g146 mm 72 mm 8.1 mm 161 g145.3 mm 69.3 mm 6.98 mm 144 g145 mm 70.9 mm 6.95 mm 144 g142.4 mm 69.6 mm 7.9 mm 152 g138.3 mm 67.1 mm 7.1 mm 138 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
532 MBit/s ∼100% +73%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308 (min: 48.8) MBit/s ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s ∼53% -9%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
279 MBit/s ∼52% -9%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
485 MBit/s ∼100% +41%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 154) MBit/s ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s ∼69% -2%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
185 MBit/s ∼38% -46%
Huawei P10
Huawei P10
Huawei P10
Huawei P10
Huawei P10
Huawei P10
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Food mode saturates colors too strongly
The robin can hardly be recognized with the x10 zoom
Ship: without zoom
Ship: x2 zoom
Ship: x10 zoom
20 MP (monochrome)
20 MP (monochrome)
20 MP (standard)
20 MP (standard)
12 MP (RGB, standard)
12 MP (RGB, standard)
12 MP (soft colors)
12 MP (soft colors)
12 MP (vivid colors)
12 MP (vivid colors)
12 MP (x2 zoom)
12 MP (x2 zoom)
12 MP (x5.5 zoom)
12 MP (x5.5 zoom)
12 MP (x10 zoom)
12 MP (x10 zoom)
12 MP (RGB, standard)
12 MP (RGB, standard)
20 MP (monochrome)
20 MP (standard)
12 MP (soft colors)
12 MP (vivid colors)
12 MP (x2 zoom)
12 MP (x5.5 zoom)
12 MP (x10 zoom)
602
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
604
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
589
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 604 cd/m² Ortalama: 556.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.39 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 86 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 547 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1272:1 (Siyah: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
Gamma: 2.39
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei P8
IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy S7
SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1
Apple iPhone 7
IPS, 1334x750, 4.7
Sony Xperia XZ
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
HTC 10
Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2
Screen
8%
3%
21%
31%
-8%
9%
Brightness middle
547
582
6%
453
-17%
350
-36%
556
2%
544
-1%
445
-19%
Brightness
556
563
1%
439
-21%
351
-37%
519
-7%
521
-6%
434
-22%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
91
6%
98
14%
90
5%
93
8%
93
8%
Black Level *
0.43
0.38
12%
0.28
35%
0.34
21%
0.37
14%
0.36
16%
Contrast
1272
1532
20%
1618
27%
1635
29%
1470
16%
1236
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.8
4.4
8%
4.7
2%
2.04
57%
1.3
73%
5.8
-21%
2.8
42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.8
7.4
16%
3.25
63%
2.6
70%
9.8
-11%
5.8
34%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.5
4.8
-7%
5.03
-12%
1.63
64%
1.9
58%
7.2
-60%
3.7
18%
Gamma
2.39 92%
2.2 100%
2.27 97%
2.07 106%
2.26 97%
2.18 101%
2.31 95%
CCT
7194 90%
6175 105%
7439 87%
6391 102%
6818 95%
8619 75%
7164 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
77.78
72.04
86.86
63.15
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.44
99.35
99.71

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18084 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.2 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
140084 Points ∼48%
Huawei P9
95743 Points ∼33% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼44% -8%
Apple iPhone 7
142532 Points ∼49% +2%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼44% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ
129317 Points ∼44% -8%
HTC 10
131866 Points ∼45% -6%
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points ∼42% -11%
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points ∼54% +14%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
6036 Points ∼15%
Huawei P9
4904 Points ∼12% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
5503 Points ∼13% -9%
Apple iPhone 7
5585 Points ∼14% -7%
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points ∼10% -35%
Sony Xperia XZ
3701 Points ∼9% -39%
Huawei Mate 9
5629 Points ∼14% -7%
OnePlus 3T
4236 Points ∼10% -30%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
1935 Points ∼31%
Huawei P9
1755 Points ∼28% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1840 Points ∼29% -5%
Apple iPhone 7
3490 Points ∼55% +80%
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points ∼23% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ
1647 Points ∼26% -15%
Huawei Mate 9
1947 Points ∼31% +1%
OnePlus 3T
1881 Points ∼30% -3%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10
1902 Points ∼37%
Huawei P9
2503 Points ∼48% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (min: 1594) Points ∼41% +12%
Lenovo Moto Z
1797 Points ∼34% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ
1667 Points ∼32% -12%
HTC 10
1688 Points ∼32% -11%
Huawei Mate 9
2117 Points ∼41% +11%
OnePlus 3T
1728 Points ∼33% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10
2409 Points ∼28%
Huawei P9
829 Points ∼10% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (min: 2043) Points ∼26% -7%
Lenovo Moto Z
2336 Points ∼28% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ
2853 Points ∼34% +18%
HTC 10
2889 Points ∼34% +20%
Huawei Mate 9
2294 Points ∼27% -5%
OnePlus 3T
2418 Points ∼29% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P10
2274 Points ∼11%
Huawei P9
974 Points ∼5% -57%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (min: 1923) Points ∼11% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼11% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ
2548 Points ∼13% +12%
HTC 10
2495 Points ∼12% +10%
Huawei Mate 9
2240 Points ∼11% -1%
OnePlus 3T
2221 Points ∼11% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10
2193 Points ∼43%
Huawei P9
2510 Points ∼50% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (min: 1539) Points ∼40% -9%
Apple iPhone 7
1525 Points ∼30% -30%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points ∼36% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ
1667 Points ∼33% -24%
HTC 10
1512 Points ∼30% -31%
Huawei Mate 9
2123 Points ∼42% -3%
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points ∼29% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10
2816 Points ∼23%
Huawei P9
1080 Points ∼9% -62%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (min: 2895) Points ∼24% +7%
Apple iPhone 7
4057 Points ∼32% +44%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points ∼30% +32%
Sony Xperia XZ
4522 Points ∼36% +61%
HTC 10
4581 Points ∼37% +63%
Huawei Mate 9
2448 Points ∼20% -13%
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points ∼26% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P10
2649 Points ∼28%
Huawei P9
1237 Points ∼13% -53%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (min: 2421) Points ∼29% +2%
Apple iPhone 7
2964 Points ∼31% +12%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points ∼32% +14%
Sony Xperia XZ
3275 Points ∼35% +24%
HTC 10
3157 Points ∼33% +19%
Huawei Mate 9
2367 Points ∼25% -11%
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points ∼27% -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10
15341 Points ∼18%
Huawei P9
15517 Points ∼18% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points ∼23% +28%
Apple iPhone 7
15450 Points ∼18% +1%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points ∼24% +37%
Sony Xperia XZ
20772 Points ∼24% +35%
HTC 10
20344 Points ∼24% +33%
Huawei Mate 9
15104 Points ∼17% -2%
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points ∼26% +46%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
35964 Points ∼7%
Huawei P9
21577 Points ∼4% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points ∼6% -8%
Apple iPhone 7
63974 Points ∼12% +78%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points ∼5% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ
32056 Points ∼6% -11%
HTC 10
30061 Points ∼6% -16%
Huawei Mate 9
35626 Points ∼7% -1%
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points ∼6% -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
27692 Points ∼11%
Huawei P9
19854 Points ∼8% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points ∼12% +4%
Apple iPhone 7
37676 Points ∼15% +36%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points ∼10% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ
28603 Points ∼12% +3%
HTC 10
27176 Points ∼11% -2%
Huawei Mate 9
27364 Points ∼11% -1%
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points ∼13% +11%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P10
69 fps ∼1%
Huawei P9
40 fps ∼0% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼1% +17%
Apple iPhone 7
110.3 fps ∼1% +60%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼1% +12%
Sony Xperia XZ
88 fps ∼1% +28%
HTC 10
73 fps ∼1% +6%
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps ∼1% +16%
OnePlus 3T
91 fps ∼1% +32%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P10
55 fps ∼2%
Huawei P9
43 fps ∼1% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼2% -7%
Apple iPhone 7
57.7 fps ∼2% +5%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼2% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ
88 fps ∼3% +60%
HTC 10
43 fps ∼1% -22%
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps ∼2% +9%
OnePlus 3T
59 fps ∼2% +7%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P10
30 fps ∼5%
Huawei P9
18 fps ∼3% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼6% +27%
Apple iPhone 7
60.7 fps ∼10% +102%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼7% +37%
Sony Xperia XZ
40 fps ∼6% +33%
HTC 10
39 fps ∼6% +30%
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps ∼5% +13%
OnePlus 3T
46 fps ∼7% +53%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P10
32 fps ∼9%
Huawei P9
19 fps ∼5% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼7% -16%
Apple iPhone 7
58.5 fps ∼16% +83%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼7% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ
39 fps ∼11% +22%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼7% -25%
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps ∼10% +16%
OnePlus 3T
45 fps ∼12% +41%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10
24 fps ∼1%
Huawei P9
10 fps ∼0% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼1% +17%
Apple iPhone 7
42.2 fps ∼1% +76%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼1% +13%
Sony Xperia XZ
31 fps ∼1% +29%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps ∼1% 0%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼1% +33%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10
25 fps ∼1%
Huawei P9
11 fps ∼0% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼0% -40%
Apple iPhone 7
59.4 fps ∼2% +138%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼0% -40%
Sony Xperia XZ
31 fps ∼1% +24%
HTC 10
14 fps ∼0% -44%
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps ∼1% +12%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼1% +28%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
6206 Points ∼47%
Huawei P9
5226 Points ∼40% -16%
Sony Xperia XZ
5616 Points ∼43% -10%
HTC 10
4549 Points ∼34% -27%
Huawei Mate 9
6299 Points ∼48% +1%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
7341 Points ∼37%
Huawei P9
7058 Points ∼36% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼24% -37%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points ∼39% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ
5058 Points ∼26% -31%
HTC 10
5809 Points ∼29% -21%
Huawei Mate 9
7403 Points ∼38% +1%
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points ∼29% -23%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼53%
Huawei P9
1029 Points ∼51% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼49% -8%
Apple iPhone 7
1531 Points ∼75% +42%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼47% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ
1066 Points ∼52% -1%
HTC 10
928 Points ∼46% -14%
Huawei Mate 9
1076 Points ∼53% 0%
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼44% -17%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10
4115 Points ∼14%
Huawei P9
1583 Points ∼5% -62%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼8% -46%
Apple iPhone 7
6896 Points ∼24% +68%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼15% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ
4716 Points ∼16% +15%
HTC 10
5009 Points ∼17% +22%
Huawei Mate 9
3939 Points ∼14% -4%
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points ∼15% +8%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P10
2778 Points ∼33%
Huawei P9
2627 Points ∼31% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼25% -25%
Apple iPhone 7
1257 Points ∼15% -55%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼26% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ
1434 Points ∼17% -48%
HTC 10
1772 Points ∼21% -36%
Huawei Mate 9
3850 Points ∼46% +39%
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points ∼23% -30%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P10
3830 Points ∼23%
Huawei P9
3930 Points ∼24% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼25% +7%
Apple iPhone 7
6097 Points ∼37% +59%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼21% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ
3047 Points ∼19% -20%
HTC 10
2806 Points ∼17% -27%
Huawei Mate 9
3616 Points ∼22% -6%
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points ∼19% -18%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P10
2621 Points ∼31%
Huawei P9
2025 Points ∼24% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼25% -21%
Apple iPhone 7
2999 Points ∼35% +14%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼28% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ
2165 Points ∼26% -17%
HTC 10
2193 Points ∼26% -16%
Huawei Mate 9
2772 Points ∼33% +6%
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points ∼26% -15%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei P10
23.56 fps ∼61%
Huawei P9
7.9 fps ∼20% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.31 fps ∼34% -44%
Lenovo Moto Z
24.33 fps ∼63% +3%
Huawei Mate 9
19.14 fps ∼49% -19%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
664 Points ∼12%
Huawei P9
328 Points ∼6% -51%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
733 Points ∼13% +10%
Apple iPhone 7
1322 Points ∼23% +99%
Apple iPhone 7
1059 Points ∼19% +59%
Lenovo Moto Z
542 Points ∼9% -18%
HTC 10
608 Points ∼11% -8%
Huawei Mate 9
699 Points ∼12% +5%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei P10
60.5 fps ∼98%
Huawei P9
58.6 fps ∼95% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
60 fps ∼97% -1%
Lenovo Moto Z
59.8 fps ∼97% -1%
Huawei Mate 9
60.5 fps ∼98% 0%

Legend

 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
136 Points ∼17%
Huawei P9
128 Points ∼16% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
163 Points ∼20% +20%
Apple iPhone 7
202 Points ∼25% +49%
Lenovo Moto Z
112 Points ∼14% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ
90 Points ∼11% -34%
HTC 10
108 Points ∼13% -21%
Huawei Mate 9
152 Points ∼19% +12%
OnePlus 3T
135 Points ∼17% -1%
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼53%
Huawei P9
1029 Points ∼51% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼49% -8%
Apple iPhone 7
1531 Points ∼75% +42%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼47% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ
1066 Points ∼52% -1%
HTC 10
928 Points ∼46% -14%
Huawei Mate 9
1076 Points ∼53% 0%
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼44% -17%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
10236 Points ∼20%
Huawei P9
11783 Points ∼22% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13191 Points ∼25% +29%
Apple iPhone 7
24875 Points ∼47% +143%
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points ∼15% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ
9069 Points ∼17% -11%
HTC 10
8905 Points ∼17% -13%
Huawei Mate 9
11897 Points ∼23% +16%
OnePlus 3T
9798 Points ∼19% -4%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
3128.7 ms * ∼5%
Huawei P9
2922.6 ms * ∼5% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2564.1 ms * ∼4% +18%
Apple iPhone 7
1113.4 ms * ∼2% +64%
Lenovo Moto Z
3154.7 ms * ∼5% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ
2768 ms * ∼5% +12%
HTC 10
3146.3 ms * ∼5% -1%
Huawei Mate 9
2733.7 ms * ∼5% +13%
OnePlus 3T
2719.3 ms * ∼5% +13%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
57.9 Points ∼16%
Huawei P9
68.4 Points ∼19% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
75.12 Points ∼21% +30%
Apple iPhone 7
165.86 Points ∼47% +186%
Lenovo Moto Z
47.5 Points ∼14% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ
54.201 Points ∼15% -6%
HTC 10
52.1 Points ∼15% -10%
Huawei Mate 9
68.6 Points ∼20% +18%
OnePlus 3T
54.526 Points ∼16% -6%
Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
Huawei P10
7346 Points ∼97%
Huawei P9
6580 (min: 6523) Points ∼87% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7198 (min: 6255) Points ∼95% -2%
Lenovo Moto Z
5344 Points ∼71% -27%
Huawei Mate 9
7565 Points ∼100% +3%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P10Huawei P9Lenovo Moto ZSony Xperia XZHTC 10Samsung Galaxy S7LG G5ZTE Axon 7
AndroBench 3-5
-49%
-8%
-48%
-20%
-16%
-20%
-13%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
32.19
24.83
-23%
45.64
42%
29.8
-7%
65.44
103%
53.6
67%
45.53
41%
51.34
59%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
54.22
55.05
2%
78.51
45%
33.5
-38%
83.3
54%
72.33
33%
78.53
45%
78.39
45%
Random Write 4KB
152.31
47.45
-69%
74.93
-51%
10.5
-93%
15.89
-90%
16.01
-89%
16.22
-89%
16.22
-89%
Random Read 4KB
168.42
39
-77%
117.15
-30%
71.5
-58%
29.92
-82%
85.9
-49%
89.26
-47%
121.07
-28%
Sequential Write 256KB
189.83
72.19
-62%
168.32
-11%
138
-27%
115.56
-39%
145.72
-23%
141.26
-26%
150.92
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB
737.65
281.26
-62%
439.66
-40%
281
-62%
275.09
-63%
483.82
-34%
427.65
-42%
406.49
-45%
Maksimum yük
 44.6 °C43.1 °C43 °C 
 43.9 °C43.1 °C43.6 °C 
 42.6 °C41.6 °C42.6 °C 
Maksimum: 44.6 °C
Ortalama: 43.1 °C
37.3 °C38.4 °C40.9 °C
37.2 °C39.6 °C40.5 °C
37.8 °C39.4 °C40.7 °C
Maksimum: 40.9 °C
Ortalama: 39.1 °C
Güç kaynağı  33.4 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.639.92525.439.83125.339.74032.934.75033.634.76331.632.78028.427.81002726.412520.828.61602241.520021.350.525020.855.931521.260.340019.46550019.568.663017.766.880017.964.4100017.866.9125017.371.5160017.473.5200016.774.5250017.273.7315018.272.2400017.970.5500017.670.7630017.764.8800017.860.41000017.9591250018.148.41600018.232.8SPL3082.7N1.352.3median 17.9median 64.8Delta1.310.629.635.529.628.529.528.526.328.226.329.631.529.627.927.427.925.125.725.124.729.424.733.831.333.843.732.143.742.620.442.64620.84647.920.247.950.419.750.451.922.351.960.820.160.866.318.966.367.517.767.567.116.767.166.91766.97014.87072.915.972.965.914.665.971.514.471.574.714.174.774.813.874.873.413.773.472.613.872.662.313.762.355.213.755.255.113.655.183.128.683.154.11.254.1median 65.9median 16.7median 65.910.53.410.540.632.932.440.641.629.831.341.634.532.131.734.538.140.92638.134.437.839.434.425.627.836.225.629.727.928.629.733.127.525.433.134.924.821.334.941.320.623.341.34526.122.54552.531.322.452.557.837.821.357.859.639.918.459.663.445.417.563.469.950.817.569.971.553.117.271.572.255.216.872.274.757.817.374.774.957.717.474.977.959.416.677.980.361.817.380.380.760.817.680.776.154.717.676.175.954.617.775.979.760.517.479.773.354.317.773.367.849.717.967.866.847.718.166.858.133.518.158.188.769.729.888.773.823.11.373.8median 69.9median 50.8median 17.7median 69.99.911.71.69.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P10Apple iPhone 7Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Huawei P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.06 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.06 / 0.19 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 0.83 / 2.1 / 2.18 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 6.57 / 9.32 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 5s
3200 mAh
Power Consumption
16%
8%
34%
36%
-1%
20%
Idle Minimum *
0.83
0.77
7%
0.68
18%
0.68
18%
0.54
35%
1.31
-58%
0.4
52%
Idle Average *
2.1
2.36
-12%
1.49
29%
1.02
51%
1.51
28%
2.03
3%
1.7
19%
Idle Maximum *
2.18
2.37
-9%
1.91
12%
1.14
48%
1.54
29%
2.08
5%
1.81
17%
Load Average *
6.57
3.09
53%
7.4
-13%
4.73
28%
3.75
43%
5.45
17%
5.84
11%
Load Maximum *
9.32
5.35
43%
9.71
-4%
7.16
23%
5.01
46%
6.75
28%
9.12
2%

* ... smaller is better

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
25h 40min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 42min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
2h 56min
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
14%
-9%
-12%
-43%
9%
Reader / Idle
1540
1514
-2%
1810
18%
1770
15%
1273
-17%
1371
-11%
H.264
582
568
-2%
892
53%
722
24%
648
11%
724
24%
WiFi v1.3
966
569
-41%
456
-53%
517
-46%
413
-57%
546
-43%
407
-58%
Load
176
206
17%
242
38%
126
-28%
203
15%
320
82%

Artılar

+ Hoş tasarım ve yüksek kaliteli bileşenler
+ Oldukça hızlı sistem çipi
+ Geniş UFS 2.1 depolama alanı
+ Hızlı LTE Cat. 12 frekans kapsamı
+ Hibrit yakınlaştırmaya sahip iyi kamera
+ Makul batarya ömrü
+ Genişletilebilir depolama alanı
+ 3 yıllık garanti
+ SuperCharge
+ İyi ekran

Eksiler

- Ekran sadece 1080p çözünürlüğe sahpi
- Ekran / Kasa oranı kötü
- Firmware
- Yavaş ac WiFi
- microSD girişi
- MHL veya SlimPort yok
- Yoğun kullanımda tıkanma
In review: Huawei P10 (VTR-L09). Review sample courtesy of Huawei.
In review: Huawei P10 (VTR-L09). Review sample courtesy of Huawei.

Huawei yine harika bir ürün sunuyor ve P10 lifestyle ürünüyle fazla eleştiriye yer bırakmıyor. Asıl üst sınıf ürünü ise P10 Plus modeli. Yine de daha küçük model birinci sınıf özelliklere sahip. UFS 2.1 depolama alanı, LTE Cat. 12 ve ışık hızında Kirin 960 sistem çipi sadece daha pahalı rakiplerde bulunan özellikler.

Leica'nın çift kamerası beğendiğimiz özelliklerden biri. Teknik olarak halen iyileştirilebilecek gibi dursa da, harika fotoğraflar seçiyor. Dahili portre modu oldukça iyi. Batarya ömrü de iyileştirilmiş.

Huawei'nin P10 modeli iyi kamerası ve geliştirilmiş batarya ömrü ile ileriye dönük bir geliştirme.

Ancak Huawei'nin üst segment bir ürün olduğu düşünüldüğünde bazı eksiklikleri mevcut. Öncelikle zayıf Wi-Fi modülü, yavaş microSD slotu ve sadece Full HD ekranı cihazın giriş yaptığı fiyat segmenti için uygun değil. 

Huawei verdiği servis ile de ekstra puan kazanıyor. VIP servis alındığında garanti süresi 3 yıla kadar çıkıyor. Huawei yine harika bir ürün çıkartmış.

Huawei P10 - 07/11/2017 v6(old)
Daniel Schmidt

İşcilik
92%
Klavye
71 / 75 → 94%
Mouse
96%
Bağlanılabilirlik
51 / 60 → 84%
Ağırlık
93%
Batarya
95%
Görüntü
87%
Oyun performansı
58 / 63 → 92%
Uygulama performansı
58 / 70 → 83%
Isınma
85%
Ses
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Camera
78%
Ortalama
80%
89%
Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Kısa inceleme: Huawei P10 akıllı telefon
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-03-29 (Update: 2017-03-29)