Notebookcheck

Kısa inceleme: Microsoft Lumia 650

Genel akım Microsoft. Yeni Lumia 650, Microsoft'un Windows işletim sistemi ve rekabetçi bir fiyat ile sunduğu akıllı telefon. Üretici daha çok iş kullanıcılarını hedeflemiş. Yavaş donanımdan ötürü bazı kısıtlamalar mevcut, buna Continuum özelliğinin olmayışı da dahil.
Microsoft Lumia 650 (Lumia Seri)
İşlemci
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A7
Grafik kartı
Qualcomm Adreno 304
Bellek
1024 MB 
Görüntü
5 inç 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, capacitive, OLED, Clear Black, TrueColor, parlak: evet
Harddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11.5 GB Boş
Bağlantılar
1 USB 2.0, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm Combo, Kart okuyucular: microSD up to 200 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: Proximity, Ambient Light, Accelerometer, WiFi-Direct
Network
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850,900, 1.800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900 and 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 4 (800, 900, 1.800, 2100 and 2600 MHz), LTE, GPS
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 6.9 x 142 x 70.9
Batarya
7.6 Wh, 2000 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, Bekleme modu 2G (üreticiye göre): 624 h
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.2, focal length: 28 mm, autofocus, LED flash)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.2, wide-angle)
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: Mono, Klavye: virtual, Klavye ışığı: evet, Power adaptor with fixed USB cable, battery, manual, Microsoft Edge, Outlook, Facebook, WhatsApp, OneDrive, Xbox Live Hub, Skype, Microsoft Office (OneNote, Word, Excel, PowerPoint), Amazon, Netflix, Lumia Offers, Audible, Expedia, Maps, Help + Tips, Shazam, 24 Ay Garanti, fanless
Ağırlık
122 g, Güç kaynağı: 64 g
Fiyat
199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

144 mm 71.5 mm 10.5 mm 140 g142.1 mm 72.4 mm 11.6 mm 155 g145 mm 71.5 mm 6.5 mm 118 g142.1 mm 71.8 mm 7.9 mm 147 g142 mm 72 mm 7.7 mm 144 g140.5 mm 70.3 mm 8.6 mm 131 g142 mm 70.9 mm 6.9 mm 122 g

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
372
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
369
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 372 cd/m² Ortalama: 353.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15.67 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 92 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 349 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Siyah: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
Gamma: 2.06
Microsoft Lumia 650
Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Archos Diamond S
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Allview E4
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
LG Class
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
-25%
7%
-46%
-44%
-28%
-59%
Brightness middle
349
418
20%
467
34%
357
2%
349
0%
534
53%
518
48%
Brightness
353
407
15%
460
30%
363
3%
353
0%
503
42%
492
39%
Brightness Distribution
92
95
3%
95
3%
95
3%
93
1%
82
-11%
91
-1%
Black Level *
0.49
0.3
0.57
0.51
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.6
3.92
-51%
3.28
-26%
6.11
-135%
5.22
-101%
5.65
-117%
5.41
-108%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.2
9.91
-21%
8.76
-7%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.8
3.81
-112%
1.89
-5%
4.12
-129%
3.96
-120%
3.69
-105%
7.67
-326%
Gamma
2.06 107%
2.27 97%
2.21 100%
2.24 98%
2.08 106%
2.15 102%
2.19 100%
CCT
6542 99%
7361 88%
6734 97%
7272 89%
7308 89%
7289 89%
8521 76%
Contrast
853
1557
937
1016

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18037 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
3.25 fps ∼27%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
5.3 fps ∼44% +63%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
5.2 fps ∼43% +60%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
12 fps ∼100% +269%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
12 fps ∼100% +269%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
9.8 fps ∼82% +202%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
5.67 fps ∼27%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
9.5 fps ∼45% +68%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
9.2 fps ∼44% +62%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
21 fps ∼100% +270%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
20 fps ∼95% +253%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
5.2 fps ∼25% -8%
Linpack Android / IOS
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
223.568 MFLOPS ∼82%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
207.718 MFLOPS ∼76% -7%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
201.99 MFLOPS ∼74% -10%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
272.2 MFLOPS ∼100% +22%
Single Thread (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
55.892 MFLOPS ∼48%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
117.086 MFLOPS ∼100% +109%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
87.69 MFLOPS ∼75% +57%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
111.54 MFLOPS ∼95% +100%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
546 Points ∼75%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
484 Points ∼66% -11%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
643 Points ∼88% +18%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
729 Points ∼100% +34%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
615 Points ∼84% +13%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
731 Points ∼100% +34%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
696 Points ∼95% +27%
Graphics (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
207 Points ∼49%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
315 Points ∼74% +52%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
316 Points ∼75% +53%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
421 Points ∼100% +103%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
314 Points ∼74% +52%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
423 Points ∼100% +104%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
312 Points ∼74% +51%
Memory (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
575 Points ∼61%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
394 Points ∼42% -31%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
797 Points ∼84% +39%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
949 Points ∼100% +65%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
399 Points ∼42% -31%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
877 Points ∼92% +53%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
427 Points ∼45% -26%
System (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
552 Points ∼31%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
1166 Points ∼65% +111%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
1077 Points ∼60% +95%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
1792 Points ∼100% +225%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
1058 Points ∼59% +92%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
1694 Points ∼95% +207%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
1068 Points ∼60% +93%
Overall (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
435 Points ∼51%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
515 Points ∼61% +18%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
646 Points ∼76% +49%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
850 Points ∼100% +95%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
534 Points ∼63% +23%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
823 Points ∼97% +89%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
561 Points ∼66% +29%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
31844 Points ∼86%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
35194 Points ∼95% +11%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
37203 Points ∼100% +17%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
2574 Points ∼78%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
3296 Points ∼100% +28%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
3012 Points ∼91% +17%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
2754 Points ∼84% +7%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
3038 Points ∼92% +18%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
3177 Points ∼96% +23%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
3028 Points ∼92% +18%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
18237.4 ms * ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
11843 ms * ∼65% +35%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
14680 ms * ∼80% +20%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
13398 ms * ∼73% +27%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
14074 ms * ∼77% +23%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
13148.9 ms * ∼72% +28%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
13979.7 ms * ∼77% +23%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
52 Points ∼88%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
52 Points ∼88% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
52 Points ∼88% 0%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
59 Points ∼100% +13%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
57 Points ∼97% +10%

* ... smaller is better

Maksimum yük
 36.2 °C37.2 °C35.1 °C 
 36.3 °C36.7 °C36.4 °C 
 35.1 °C35.5 °C35.1 °C 
Maksimum: 37.2 °C
Ortalama: 36 °C
37.7 °C38.2 °C35.5 °C
36 °C33.7 °C33.3 °C
33.9 °C33.7 °C32.5 °C
Maksimum: 38.2 °C
Ortalama: 34.9 °C
Güç kaynağı  40 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
Microsoft Lumia 650
Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Archos Diamond S
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Allview E4
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
LG Class
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Heat
-6%
1%
4%
-2%
-16%
-1%
Maximum Upper Side *
37.2
41.2
-11%
41.1
-10%
34.3
8%
38.3
-3%
41.3
-11%
38.6
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
38.2
39.2
-3%
37
3%
33.7
12%
37.7
1%
45.1
-18%
35
8%
Idle Upper Side *
30.9
33.4
-8%
30
3%
32
-4%
31.9
-3%
36
-17%
34.2
-11%
Idle Bottom *
30.5
31.1
-2%
27.9
9%
31
-2%
30.8
-1%
35.3
-16%
29.6
3%

* ... smaller is better

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.07 / 0.22 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.1 / 1.18 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 4.04 / 4.07 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Microsoft Lumia 650
7.6 Wh
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
 Wh
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
 Wh
Archos Diamond S
 Wh
Samsung Galaxy J5
10 Wh
Allview E4
8 Wh
LG Class
 Wh
Power Consumption
11%
18%
-10%
-64%
-193%
-49%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.4
43%
0.5
29%
0.8
-14%
1.5
-114%
3.11
-344%
1.2
-71%
Idle Average *
1.1
1
9%
0.9
18%
1.21
-10%
2.2
-100%
4.06
-269%
1.9
-73%
Idle Maximum *
1.18
1.2
-2%
1.1
7%
1.32
-12%
2.4
-103%
4.23
-258%
2.2
-86%
Load Average *
4.04
2.9
28%
2.4
41%
3.73
8%
3.5
13%
5.53
-37%
3.1
23%
Load Maximum *
4.07
5
-23%
4.3
-6%
4.97
-22%
4.8
-18%
6.33
-56%
5.6
-38%

* ... smaller is better

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
15h 10min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 30min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
3h 33min
Microsoft Lumia 650
7.6 Wh
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
 Wh
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
 Wh
Archos Diamond S
 Wh
Samsung Galaxy J5
10 Wh
Allview E4
8 Wh
LG Class
 Wh
Battery Runtime
40%
-23%
38%
45%
-10%
11%
Reader / Idle
910
1364
50%
1292
42%
827
-9%
976
7%
H.264
510
677
33%
657
29%
456
-11%
628
23%
WiFi v1.3
345
526
52%
267
-23%
475
38%
495
43%
315
-9%
422
22%
Load
213
264
24%
350
64%
193
-9%
196
-8%

Artılar

+ İyi yapım kalitesi ve sağlam kasa
+ Çıkarılabilir arka kapak
+ Değiştirilebilir batarya
+ microSD ile depolama alanı genişletilebiliyor
+ Harika AMOLED ekran
+ Makul kamera
+ İyi GPS
+ Microsoft Office

Eksiler

- Ortalama batarya süresi
- Düşük performans
- USB kablosu veya kulaklık yok
- Continuum veya Windows Hello yok
- Kötü hoparlör
- Zayıf şarj ünitesi
In review: Microsoft Lumia 650. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.
In review: Microsoft Lumia 650. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

Microsoft Lumia eski Lumia 640 modelinin başarılı sayılabilecek bir güncellemesi. Cihazda daha büyük Lumia 950 ve Lumia 950 XL modellerinin tasarım dili kullanılarak daha iyi kasa ve harika AMOLED ekran kullanılmış. İncelememizden sonra ise aslında cihazın neden iş kullanıcıları için harika bir çözüm olarak adlandırıldığını tam anlayamıyoruz. Windows Hello ve Continuum gibi özellikler yok ve geriye sadece Microsoft Office kalıyor.

Cihazın en büyük sorun kesinlikle yavaş performansı. Windows 10 Mobile tek başına akıcı şekilde çalışsa da kompleks uygulamalara sıra gelince yavaşlamalar oldukça fark ediliyor. Diğer büyük problem ise Windows, çünkü henüz geniş bir uygulama havuzu yok. Eğer Windows 10 Mobile kullanmayı düşünüyorsanız favori uygulamalarınızın olup olmadığına bakmanızda fayda var.

Microsoft Lumia 650 harika ekrana sahip makul bir cihaz. Ama Windows 10 Mobil ve yavaş performansın limitasyonlarına kendinizi hazırlamanız gerekli.

Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.

Microsoft Lumia 650 - 05/09/2016 v5.1(old)
Andreas Osthoff

İşcilik
81%
Klavye
74 / 75 → 98%
Mouse
89%
Bağlanılabilirlik
35 / 60 → 59%
Ağırlık
95%
Batarya
88%
Görüntü
87%
Oyun performansı
3 / 63 → 5%
Uygulama performansı
28 / 70 → 40%
Isınma
91%
Ses
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Camera
71%
Ortalama
69%
82%
Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Kısa inceleme: Microsoft Lumia 650
Andreas Osthoff, 2016-05-27 (Update: 2016-05-27)
Andreas Osthoff
Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Notebooks