Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarKısa inceleme: ThinkPad E480 (i5-8250U, RX 550) Laptop
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aydınlatma: 80 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 253 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1321:1 (Siyah: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
62.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.29% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.88% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Innolux N140HCA-EAC, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA AUO1E3D, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell Latitude 14 3470 Innolux N140BGE, , 1366x768, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | -10% | -2% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 41.88 | 41.23 -2% | 37.6 -10% | 41.04 -2% | 40.21 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 62.8 | 61.4 -2% | 56.6 -10% | 61.2 -3% | 60.5 -4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.29 | 42.67 -1% | 38.85 -10% | 42.47 -2% | 41.55 -4% |
| Response Times | 5% | 12% | 7% | 5% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 40.8 ? 7% | 43.2 ? 2% | 39 ? 11% | 47 ? -7% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 31.2 ? | 30.4 ? 3% | 24.4 ? 22% | 28 ? 10% | 26 ? 17% |
| PWM Frequency | 24880 ? | 25000 ? 0% | |||
| Screen | -22% | -48% | -16% | -61% | |
| Brightness middle | 251 | 244 -3% | 216 -14% | 271 8% | 206 -18% |
| Brightness | 231 | 231 0% | 203 -12% | 256 11% | 193 -16% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 89 11% | 83 4% | 85 6% | 87 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.37 -95% | 0.47 -147% | 0.43 -126% | 0.48 -153% |
| Contrast | 1321 | 659 -50% | 460 -65% | 630 -52% | 429 -68% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 6.41 -26% | 8.98 -76% | 5.03 1% | 11 -116% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.6 | 13.4 -26% | 14.07 -33% | 11.9 -12% | 19.57 -85% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 5.94 -32% | 9.61 -114% | 4.02 11% | 11.51 -156% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.28 96% | 2.63 84% | 2.31 95% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 6146 106% | 6101 107% | 11265 58% | 6659 98% | 13671 48% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39.8 | 39.3 -1% | 35.9 -10% | 39 -2% | 38.46 -3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62.5 | 61.1 -2% | 56.7 -9% | 61 -2% | 60.61 -3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-15% | -15% /
-32% | -4% /
-9% | -20% /
-41% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 24880 Hz | ≤ 40 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 24880 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 24880 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 470 G5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD | |
| HP ProBook 470 G5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| PCMark 10 | |
| Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Productivity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Essentials | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4187 puan | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5189 puan | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3954 puan | |
Yardım | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G) | Dell Latitude 14 3470 Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 31% | -88% | 13% | 116% | |
| Read Seq | 1295 | 476.5 -63% | 108.9 -92% | 491.2 -62% | 1086 -16% |
| Write Seq | 160.6 | 458.7 186% | 103.2 -36% | 322.2 101% | 581 262% |
| Read 512 | 872 | 346.4 -60% | 310.1 -64% | 869 0% | |
| Write 512 | 122 | 291.1 139% | 276 126% | 584 379% | |
| Read 4k | 25.72 | 35.15 37% | 0.362 -99% | 19.57 -24% | 35.89 40% |
| Write 4k | 95.2 | 78.8 -17% | 0.946 -99% | 77.8 -18% | 122.4 29% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 389.9 | 276 -29% | 0.721 -100% | 146.3 -62% | 462.9 19% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 118.3 | 178.3 51% | 0.901 -99% | 241.4 104% | 370.9 214% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4748 puan | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8755 puan | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2759 puan | |
Yardım | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| düşük | orta | yüksek | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 159.4 | 90.7 | 21.9 | 22.35 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 53.8 | 34.04 | 17.34 | |
| Civilization VI (2016) | 59.8 | 48.74 | 24.04 |
Ses yüksekliği
| Boşta |
| 29.8 / 31.5 / 33.3 dB |
| Çalışırken |
| 39.1 / 40.4 dB |
 | ||
30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 29.8 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.9 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 71.6 °C / 161 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.1 °C / 84.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1.4 °C / -2.5 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Kapalı / Bekleme modu | 0.39 / 0.64 Watt |
| Boşta | 4.1 / 6.3 / 7.1 Watt |
| Çalışırken |
54.8 / 66.4 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 i5-8250U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520, TN LED, 1366x768, 14.00 | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, TN, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 15% | 10% | 18% | 6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 2.7 34% | 5 -22% | 3 27% | 4.5 -10% |
| Idle Average * | 6.3 | 5.5 13% | 6.8 -8% | 5.4 14% | 7.1 -13% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.1 | 6.5 8% | 8.9 -25% | 6.3 11% | 10.2 -44% |
| Load Average * | 54.8 | 44.2 19% | 26.2 52% | 37.5 32% | 29.8 46% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.8 | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 66.4 | 65.2 2% | 31.8 52% | 61.1 8% | 31 53% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 i5-8250U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 48 Wh | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 45 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -1% | 23% | -1% | 5% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1164 | 668 -43% | 1083 -7% | 976 -16% | 1043 -10% |
| H.264 | 536 | 571 7% | 503 -6% | 503 -6% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 341 | 278 -18% | 414 21% | 341 0% | 326 -4% |
| Load | 88 | 140 59% | 151 72% | 104 18% | 124 41% |
Artılar
Eksiler
ThinkPad E480 güçlü bileşenlere ve makul bir fiyata sahip bir cihaz. Ancak sadece bileşenlere bakıp karar vermemek gerek. Nihayetinde asıl önemli olan pratikteki performans.
E480 kendinden söz ettirecek birçok iyi değere sahip. Elden geçen kasası da bunlardan biri. Kalitesiyle tatmin edici. Aydınlatmalı klavye oldukça iyi. Trackpoint ve touchpad de kullanışlı. Bağlantı olanakları yönünden de herhangi bir sorun gözükmüyor. Dilerseniz 2 RAM ve bir adet SSD slotu da boş bırakılmış. Ekran parlak değil, ama mat IPS ekran kontrast değeri ile çok fazla eleştiriye yer bırakmıyor.
Zayıf yönleri ise SD kart slotu yerine MicroSD kullanılması, kullanılan SSD modelinin yavaş olması olarak sıralanabilir. Ancak en büyük zayıflık soğutma sisteminde. Performans düşüşleri bir yana kasanın dışında 71.6 dereceye kadar sıcaklık ölçmek mümkün. Cihazı kullanırken eldiven takmak belki bir çözüm olabilir. Bunun dışında ortalama batarya ömrü, batarya kullanımında grafik performansının düşüşü gibi konular oldukça alakasız kalıyor.
Eğer bir yerlerinizi yakmak istemiyorsanız AMD grafik çözümü kullanan modelden uzak durun.
Fiyat-performans oranı ne kadar iyi olursa olsun, bu bileşenlerle E480 önerilebilecek bir durumda değil. Elbette ölçtüğümüz sıcaklıklar test ortamında ve test koşullarında, ama bu değerlere sizin de gündelik ortamda ulaşmanız mümkün olabilir.
E480 gerçek anlamıyla bir potansiyeli olan cihaz, ama böyle bir sonuca ulaşmak tam anlamıyla hayal kırıklığı. Intel UHD 620 kullanan modeller bu konuda daha iyi olabilir.
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000
-
01/29/2018 v6(old)
Benjamin Herzig