Motorola Edge 30 smartphone rövid értékelés: Pehelysúly 144 Hz-es kijelzővel

Name: Motorola Edge 30
Brand: Motorola

Könnyű. Az Edge sorozat a Motorola legjobb telefonjaiból áll, az Edge 30 pedig a legújabb tag. Alig 7 milliméteres méretével az egyik legvékonyabb telefon a piacon, amihez nagy teljesítmény, világos AMOLED képernyő és két 50 MP-es kamera társul.

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (Çeviren Zoltán Kiss), Published 09/02/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Motorola Edge 30 (Edge Seri)

İşlemci

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G 8 x 1.9 - 2.5 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)

Grafik kartı

Qualcomm Adreno 642L

Bellek

8 GB

, LPDDR5

Görüntü

6.50 inç 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, FHD+, HDR10+, Gorilla Glass 3, parlak: evet, 144 Hz

Harddisk

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 108 GB Boş

Bağlantılar

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ses çıkışları: USB-C, 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: Közelség, Gyorsulásmérő, Giroszkóp, Sar szenzor, Magnetométer (irántyű), Wi-Fi Direct, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3

Network

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (Sáv 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/8), 4G (Sáv 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/20/26/28/32/38/39/40/41/41/42/43/66), LTE DL Cat.15, LTE UL Cat.10, 5G (Sáv 1/2/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/78), Fej SAR 0.92 W/kg, Test SAR 1.35 W/kg, Dual SIM, , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 6.8 x 159.4 x 74.2

Batarya

4020 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 33 wattos töltés

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

İşletim sistemi

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix Tripla: 50MP Fő Kamera (f1.8, 1/1.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS) + 50MP Ultraszéles Látószögű Kamera (f/1.5, 1.28µm, 118° FOV) + 2MP Mélységélesség Szensor (f/2.4m 1.75µm); videók max. 4K UHD@30fps
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.3; videók max. 4K UHD@30fps

Ek özellikler

Hoparlörler: stereo, Klavye: virtuális, 33 wattos töltő, USB-C kábel, útmutatók, SIM-kiadó eszköz, védőtok, 24 Ay Garanti, IP52, fanless

Ağırlık

155 g, Güç kaynağı: 77 g

Fiyat

450 Euro

Bağlantılar

Motorola anasayfa

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
86.4 %	09/2022	Motorola Edge 30 SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L	155 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
85.3 %	11/2021	Huawei Nova 9 SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L	175 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.57"	2340x1080
85.5 %	10/2021	Honor 50 SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L	175 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.57"	2340x1080
84.2 %	09/2021	Motorola Edge 20 SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L	163 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080
83.4 %	08/2022	Samsung Galaxy A53 Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4	189 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
86.4 %	06/2022	Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L	158 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=208, last 2 years)	657 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	345 (328^min - 351^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=209, last 2 years)	694 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	269 (255^min - 281^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)	1536 MBit/s +62%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	946 (876^min - 953^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone (598 - 1840, n=61, last 2 years)	1364 MBit/s +44%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	946 (884^min - 949^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	852 (384^min - 906^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	845 (779^min - 895^max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	697 (664^min - 716^max) MBit/s
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	692 (347^min - 713^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	809 (717^min - 844^max) MBit/s
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	769 (725^min - 813^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	766 (339^min - 805^max) MBit/s
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	727 (616^min - 781^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s

Motorola Edge 30; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø946 (876-953)

Motorola Edge 30; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø946 (884-949)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1 Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2 Ultraweitwinkel Lowlight-Aufnahme

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


613 cd/m²	629 cd/m²	651 cd/m²
604 cd/m²	632 cd/m²	655 cd/m²
604 cd/m²	626 cd/m²	655 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 655 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 629.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.79 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 92 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 632 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Siyah: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.209

	Motorola Edge 30 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50	Huawei Nova 9 OLED, 2340x1080, 6.57	Honor 50 OLED, 2340x1080, 6.57	Motorola Edge 20 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.70	Samsung Galaxy A53 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50	Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Screen		3%	-36%	-27%	3%	32%
Brightness middle	632	621 -2%	731 16%	479 -24%	718 14%	797 26%
Brightness	630	632 0%	722 15%	480 -24%	730 16%	800 27%
Brightness Distribution	92	96 4%	97 5%	94 2%	92 0%	97 5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.46	1.7 -16%	3.1 -112%	2.06 -41%	1.62 -11%	0.9 38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.32	2.8 16%	5.8 -75%	4.54 -37%	4.21 -27%	2 40%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.6	2.2 15%	4.2 -62%	3.5 -35%	2 23%	1.1 58%
Gamma	2.209 ^100%	2.17 ^101%	2.19 ^100%	2.205 ^100%	2.156 ^102%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6755 ^96%	6806 ^96%	6818 ^95%	6794 ^96%	6545 ^99%	6397 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

250 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17942 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8 ms rise
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=215, last 2 years)	915 Points +11%
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	826 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (813 - 826, n=3)	821 Points -1%
Huawei Nova 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	790 Points -4%
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	788 Points -5%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	787 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	767 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	740 Points -10%
Multi-Core
Huawei Nova 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	3000 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=215, last 2 years)	2998 Points +4%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	2962 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (2872 - 2998, n=3)	2933 Points +2%
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	2889 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	2872 Points
Motorola Edge 20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	2785 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1878 Points -35%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=152, last 2 years)	739951 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (553328 - 582264, n=3)	564791 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	553328 Points
Motorola Edge 20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	520706 Points -6%
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	519177 Points -6%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	509185 Points -8%
Huawei Nova 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	467593 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	409976 Points -26%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	15194 Points
Motorola Edge 20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	13296 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (11662 - 15194, n=3)	13225 Points -13%
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	12076 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=210, last 2 years)	11754 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	11470 Points -25%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	10755 Points -29%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=163, last 2 years)	836 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (730 - 760, n=3)	741 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	732 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	678 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	579 Points -21%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=164, last 2 years)	5753 Points +17%
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	5002 Points +1%
Huawei Nova 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4950 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (4768 - 5150, n=3)	4950 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4932 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4809 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4615 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3626 Points -26%
System
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	10940 Points
Huawei Nova 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	10816 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (10424 - 10940, n=3)	10758 Points -2%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	10455 Points -4%
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	9880 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=164, last 2 years)	9684 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	8751 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	7157 Points -35%
Memory
Huawei Nova 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	6372 Points +34%
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	6307 Points +32%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=164, last 2 years)	6262 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (4762 - 6203, n=3)	5243 Points +10%
Motorola Edge 20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	5234 Points +10%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4957 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4762 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3855 Points -19%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=164, last 2 years)	14144 Points +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6893 - 8175, n=3)	7528 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	7516 Points
Motorola Edge 20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	6763 Points -10%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	6729 Points -10%
Huawei Nova 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	6726 Points -11%
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	6659 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	5178 Points -31%
Web
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	1534 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	1511 Points
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	1509 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=164, last 2 years)	1495 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	1465 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (1273 - 1511, n=3)	1431 Points -5%
Huawei Nova 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	1295 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1210 Points -20%

AImark - Score v2.x
Motorola Edge 20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	137968 Points +2288%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (5777 - 139804, n=3)	50468 Points +774%
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)	21146 Points +266%
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	5777 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	4714 Points -18%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	Points -100%

3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	768 Points
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	690 Points -10%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	689 Points -10%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	688 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	621 Points -19%
Wild Life Extreme
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	764 Points
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	695 Points -9%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	695 Points -9%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	694 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	636 Points -17%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2831 Points
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2501 Points -12%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2500 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2499 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2275 Points -20%
Wild Life Score
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2814 Points
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2505 Points -11%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2505 Points -11%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2492 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2293 Points -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3523 Points +30%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2718 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2689 Points -1%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2588 Points -5%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2557 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5928 Points
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5370 Points -9%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5338 Points -10%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5302 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3902 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4810 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4696 Points
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4300 Points -8%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4299 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3546 Points -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4831 Points +6%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4677 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4547 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4166 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3097 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6240 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5651 Points -9%
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5637 Points -10%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5614 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3982 Points -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5763 Points
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5435 Points -6%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5375 Points -7%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5236 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3746 Points -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4529 Points +6%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4439 Points +4%
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4410 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4270 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2261 Points -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8182 Points
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7276 Points -11%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7238 Points -12%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7224 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5172 Points -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6798 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6389 Points -6%
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6358 Points -6%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6340 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4021 Points -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5385 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5036 Points -6%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5027 Points -7%
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5018 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3621 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5807 Points
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5218 Points -10%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5213 Points -10%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5178 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3939 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4561 Points +6%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4501 Points +5%
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4423 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4293 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2823 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7281 Points
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6639 Points -9%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6638 Points -9%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6458 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4645 Points -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8605 Points
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7618 Points -11%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7608 Points -12%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7536 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5510 Points -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4732 Points
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4684 Points -1%
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4580 Points -3%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4224 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2997 Points -37%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	116 fps +29%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99 fps +10%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	89 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	81 fps -10%
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -33%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	148 fps
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	133 fps -10%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	133 fps -10%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	133 fps -10%
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	133 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	92 fps -38%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	85 fps
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	69 fps -19%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	69 fps -19%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	68 fps -20%
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	56 fps -34%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	79 fps -11%
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps -11%
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	78 fps -12%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	77 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	61 fps -31%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps -21%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	51 fps -24%
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	49 fps -27%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	48 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	35 fps -48%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	57 fps -10%
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -10%
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	56 fps -11%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	56 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	38 fps -40%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -21%
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	29 fps -26%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps -26%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	28 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps -49%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	33 fps -11%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	33 fps -11%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	33 fps -11%
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	23 fps -38%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps -15%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps -23%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -23%
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	19 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	15 fps -42%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	15 fps
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	14 fps -7%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -7%
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14 fps -7%
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	13 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	10 fps -33%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps -12%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	33 fps -17%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	32 fps -20%
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	30 fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	23 fps -42%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	39 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	38 fps -3%
Huawei Nova 9 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps -3%
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	34 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	26 fps -33%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=171, last 2 years)	105.8 Points +17%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)	90.283 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (73.7 - 100.4, n=3)	88.1 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)	86.8 Points -4%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)	86.2 Points -5%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)	76.1 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	63.5 Points -30%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)	58.8 Points -35%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=156, last 2 years)	107.2 runs/min +61%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)	66.48 runs/min
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)	61.5 runs/min -7%
Motorola Edge 20 (Chome 95)	61.3 runs/min -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (53.7 - 66.5, n=3)	61.3 runs/min -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)	51.24 runs/min -23%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=121, last 2 years)	133 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)	131 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)	116 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (102 - 127, n=3)	115 Points -1%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)	113 Points -3%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)	102 Points -12%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)	96 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	69 Points -41%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=209, last 2 years)	33561 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)	32109 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)	31915 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)	31783 Points -1%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)	31134 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (24488 - 32794, n=3)	29797 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	24159 Points -25%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)	23915 Points -26%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	1920.3 ms * -44%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)	1893 ms * -42%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=171, last 2 years)	1602 ms * -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (1236 - 1796, n=3)	1456 ms * -9%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)	1427 ms * -7%
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)	1344 ms * -1%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)	1335 ms *
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)	1323 ms * +1%

* ... smaller is better

	Motorola Edge 30	Huawei Nova 9	Honor 50	Motorola Edge 20	Samsung Galaxy A53	Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE	Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-16%	-15%	-30%	-34%	-28%	-4%	7%
Sequential Read 256KB	1514.62	1030 -32%	984 -35%	1011 -33%	510.1 -66%	944 -38%	1599 ?(1030 - 3134, n=56) 6%	1509 ?(226 - 4512, n=214, last 2 years) 0%
Sequential Write 256KB	965.35	759 -21%	609 -37%	471.4 -51%	486.7 -50%	679 -30%	777 ?(233 - 1332, n=56) -20%	1116 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=214, last 2 years) 16%
Random Read 4KB	241.72	229.6 -5%	245.7 2%	190.2 -21%	229.9 -5%	208.7 -14%	244 ?(126.2 - 428, n=56) 1%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=214, last 2 years) 2%
Random Write 4KB	249.14	239.2 -4%	280.2 12%	210.6 -15%	210.8 -15%	178.8 -28%	245 ?(121.4 - 503, n=56) -2%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=214, last 2 years) 9%

Motorola Edge 30; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø60.2 (59-61)

Motorola Edge 30; PUBG Mobile; 2.0.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)

Motorola Edge 30; Subway Surfers; 2.36.0: Ø90 (82-91)

Maksimum yük

Bekleme


45 °C	44 °C	39.9 °C
45.7 °C	44 °C	40.1 °C
46.5 °C	43.5 °C	39.6 °C

Maksimum: 46.5 °C
Ortalama: 43.1 °C


39.9 °C	44.7 °C	47.4 °C
40.4 °C	44.6 °C	48.4 °C
39.5 °C	44.7 °C	48.5 °C

Maksimum: 48.5 °C
Ortalama: 44.2 °C

Güç kaynağı 40.3 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.6 (13.7^min) % +1%
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.4 (14.9^min) % +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.2 (14.8^min) % 0%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.2 (14.8^min) % 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98.8 (16.8^min) %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.8 (4.14^min) % +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.7 (4.14^min) % +1%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 (4.14^min) % 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.1 (4.54^min) %
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	97.8 (3.75^min) % -1%

Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø4.57 (4.54-4.59)

Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø4.15 (4.14-4.15)

Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø4.14 (4.14-4.15)

Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.81 (3.75-3.84)

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø4.15 (4.14-4.17)

Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.9 (16.8-17)

Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.9 (14.9-15)

Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.9 (14.8-14.9)

Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.7-13.7)

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø14.9 (14.8-15)

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Edge 30 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Edge 20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Anlık tüketim

Kapalı / Bekleme modu	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Boşta	0.9 / 1.2 / 1.5 Watt
Çalışırken	3.6 / 7.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Motorola Edge 30 4020 mAh	Huawei Nova 9 4300 mAh	Honor 50 4300 mAh	Motorola Edge 20 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A53 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE 4250 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-39%	-54%	-7%	-15%	-15%	-15%	-20%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.96 -7%	1.02 -13%	1 -11%	0.9 -0%	0.78 13%	1.067 ?(0.9 - 1.3, n=3) -19%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -0%
Idle Average *	1.2	2.47 -106%	2.98 -148%	1.3 -8%	1.3 -8%	1.97 -64%	1.333 ?(1.2 - 1.6, n=3) -11%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -21%
Idle Maximum *	1.5	2.55 -70%	3.11 -107%	1.6 -7%	1.6 -7%	1.99 -33%	1.7 ?(1.5 - 2.1, n=3) -13%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -9%
Load Average *	3.6	3.85 -7%	3.59 -0%	3.9 -8%	5.7 -58%	3.23 10%	4.37 ?(3.6 - 5.3, n=3) -21%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -54%
Load Maximum *	7.1	7.43 -5%	7.12 -0%	7.2 -1%	7.3 -3%	7.08 -0%	7.8 ?(7.1 - 8.9, n=3) -10%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -17%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G: Ø4.39 (1.649-7.82)

Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G: Ø3.88 (1.16-7.96)

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G: Ø3.65 (1.007-8.03)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.19 (3.86-4.55)

Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.99 (3.04-4.7)

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.68 (3.47-4.19)

Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.148 (0.912-1.516)

Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.585 (1.497-1.802)

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.169 (1.054-1.294)

Batarya ömrü

Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)		26h 44min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 42min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)		4h 28min

	Motorola Edge 30 4020 mAh	Huawei Nova 9 4300 mAh	Honor 50 4300 mAh	Motorola Edge 20 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A53 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE 4250 mAh
Battery Runtime		2%	42%	-4%	24%	6%
Reader / Idle	1604			1540 -4%	2431 52%	1648 3%
H.264	1002			1105 10%	1146 14%	1215 21%
WiFi v1.3	638	652 2%	907 42%	716 12%	886 39%	705 11%
Load	268			183 -32%	246 -8%	233 -13%

Artılar

+ nagyon vékony és könnyű készülékház

+ gyors és stabil WLAN

+ alap Android

+ világos és színhű AMOLED kijelző

+ 144Hz-es képkockasebesség

+ nappali fényben jó kamera

+ sztereó hangszórók

+ mellékelt hálózati adapter

Eksiler

- nincs vezeték nélküli töltés

- középszerű üzemidő

- nincs microSD foglalat

Összegzés:

In review: Motorola Edge 30. Review device provided by Motorola Germany.

A Motorola Edge 30 egy jó középkategóriás telefon extra vékony házban, és 155 grammos pehelykönnyű súlyával megelőzi a versenytársakat. Akik különösen vékony és könnyű telefont szeretnének, azok megfelelő jelöltet találnak ebben a 6,5 hüvelykes modellben.

A látszat ellenére az Edge 30 a teljesítményt tekintve nem könnyűsúlyú. A Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, a 8 GB RAM és a 128 GB tárhelynek köszönhetően jól felszerelt a mindennapi használatra, és valamivel gyorsabb, mint egyik fő riválisa, a Samsung Galaxy A53 5G. Az Edge 30 még egy lépéssel tovább is megy az AMOLED képernyőjének 144 Hz-es képkockasebességével. További pluszpontok az alap Android 12, a gyors és stabil WLAN, a sztereó hangszórók és az 50 MP-es kamera, amely nappali fényben jó fotókat készít.

A Motorola Edge 30 egy vékony és könnyű középkategóriás telefon 144 Hz-es kijelzővel és jó teljesítménnyel, de kissé rövid üzemidővel.

Az Edge 20 egyik fő kritikája az Edge 30-ra is érvényes: az akkumulátor üzemideje legfeljebb átlagosnak mondható. A felhasználók tehát nem számíthatnak arra, hogy a telefon valós használat mellett mindig egy napnál tovább bírja. A vásárlóknak emellett nélkülözniük kell a microSD foglalatot és az Edge 30 vezeték nélküli töltésének lehetőségét is.

A Motorola Edge 30-nak jó alternatívája lehet például a Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, amely majdnem ugyanolyan gyors, valamivel világosabb 120 Hz-es AMOLED panellel rendelkezik, és valamivel olcsóbb is. Még olcsóbb a Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE, amely Snapdragon 778G-vel fut, és 90 Hz-es AMOLED képernyőt használ.

Ár és Elérhetőség

A nemrég tesztelt Motorola Moto G82 5G-hez hasonlóan az Edge 30 elérhetősége is szórványosnak tűnik. A vásárlóknak ezért ajánlott közvetlenül a Motorola helyi weboldalán keresztül tájékozódni. Ezen helyeknek a listája elérhető itt. A hely kiválasztása után egyszerűen beírjuk az Edge 30-at a keresősávba.

Mi például azt találtuk, hogy a telefon már elérhető az Egyesült Királyságban, Franciaországban, Kolumbiában, Indiában, Malajziában és Brazíliában (a lista nem teljes). Az elérhető konfigurációk azonban eltérőek lehetnek; egyes országokban csak egy (8/128 vagy 8/256) lehet a kínálatban. Néhány másik országban mindkét konfigurációt kínálják.

Motorola Edge 30 - 2022-08-30 08/30/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

İşcilik

83%

Klavye

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

93%

Bağlanılabilirlik

50 / 70 → 72%

Ağırlık

92%

Batarya

89%

Görüntü

88%

Oyun performansı

56 / 64 → 87%

Uygulama performansı

81 / 86 → 94%

Isınma

80%

Ses

100%

Audio

77 / 90 → 86%

Camera

77%

Ortalama

79%

86%

Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 865 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 386552 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Motorola Edge 30 smartphone rövid értékelés: Pehelysúly 144 Hz-es kijelzővel

Manuel Masiero, 2022-09- 2 (Update: 2022-09- 2)

Motorola Edge 30 smartphone rövid értékelés: Pehelysúly 144 Hz-es kijelzővel

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Motorola Edge 30 audio analysis

Motorola Edge 20 audio analysis

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Artılar

Eksiler

Összegzés:

Ár és Elérhetőség

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare