Notebookcheck Logo

Motorola Edge 30 smartphone rövid értékelés: Pehelysúly 144 Hz-es kijelzővel

Könnyű. Az Edge sorozat a Motorola legjobb telefonjaiból áll, az Edge 30 pedig a legújabb tag. Alig 7 milliméteres méretével az egyik legvékonyabb telefon a piacon, amihez nagy teljesítmény, világos AMOLED képernyő és két 50 MP-es kamera társul.
Motorola Edge 30 (Edge Seri)
İşlemci
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G 8 x 1.9 - 2.5 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Grafik kartı
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Bellek
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Görüntü
6.50 inç 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, FHD+, HDR10+, Gorilla Glass 3, parlak: evet, 144 Hz
Harddisk
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB Boş
Bağlantılar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ses çıkışları: USB-C, 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: Közelség, Gyorsulásmérő, Giroszkóp, Sar szenzor, Magnetométer (irántyű), Wi-Fi Direct, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Network
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (Sáv 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/8), 4G (Sáv 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/20/26/28/32/38/39/40/41/41/42/43/66), LTE DL Cat.15, LTE UL Cat.10, 5G (Sáv 1/2/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/78), Fej SAR 0.92 W/kg, Test SAR 1.35 W/kg, Dual SIM, , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 6.8 x 159.4 x 74.2
Batarya
4020 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 33 wattos töltés
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
İşletim sistemi
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix Tripla: 50MP Fő Kamera (f1.8, 1/1.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS) + 50MP Ultraszéles Látószögű Kamera (f/1.5, 1.28µm, 118° FOV) + 2MP Mélységélesség Szensor (f/2.4m 1.75µm); videók max. 4K [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.3; videók max. 4K [email protected]
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: stereo, Klavye: virtuális, 33 wattos töltő, USB-C kábel, útmutatók, SIM-kiadó eszköz, védőtok, 24 Ay Garanti, IP52, fanless
Ağırlık
155 g, Güç kaynağı: 77 g
Fiyat
450 Euro
Bağlantılar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.4 %
09/2022
Motorola Edge 30
SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L
155 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
85.3 %
11/2021
Huawei Nova 9
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
175 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
85.5 %
10/2021
Honor 50
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
175 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
84.2 %
09/2021
Motorola Edge 20
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
163 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
83.4 %
08/2022
Samsung Galaxy A53
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
86.4 %
06/2022
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
158 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080

Size Comparison

163 mm 76 mm 7 mm 163 g160 mm 73.7 mm 7.77 mm 175 g159.96 mm 73.76 mm 7.78 mm 175 g159.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.1 mm 189 g160.53 mm 75.73 mm 6.81 mm 158 g159.4 mm 74.2 mm 6.8 mm 155 g
Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 1736, n=91, last 2 years)
631 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 (328min - 351max) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (57.7 - 1710, n=92, last 2 years)
666 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
269 (255min - 281max) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (853 - 1768, n=12, last 2 years)
1393 MBit/s ∼100% +47%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (876min - 953max) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (598 - 1751, n=12, last 2 years)
1263 MBit/s ∼100% +34%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (884min - 949max) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
852 (384min - 906max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
845 (779min - 895max) MBit/s ∼99%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
697 (664min - 716max) MBit/s ∼82%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 (347min - 713max) MBit/s ∼81%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=175, last 2 years)
491 MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
809 (717min - 844max) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
769 (725min - 813max) MBit/s ∼95%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
766 (339min - 805max) MBit/s ∼95%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
727 (616min - 781max) MBit/s ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=176, last 2 years)
469 MBit/s ∼58%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø946 (876-953)
; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø946 (884-949)
Garmin Venu 2: GPS test summary
Garmin Venu 2: GPS test summary
Garmin Venu 2: bridge
Garmin Venu 2: bridge
Garmin Venu 2: loop
Garmin Venu 2: loop
Motorola Edge 30: GPS test summary
Motorola Edge 30: GPS test summary
Motorola Edge 30: bridge
Motorola Edge 30: bridge
Motorola Edge 30: loop
Motorola Edge 30: loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2UltraweitwinkelLowlight-Aufnahme
click to load images
ColorChecker
18.7 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
18 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 30: 12.27 ∆E min: 1.2 - max: 19.86 ∆E
ColorChecker
14.6 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
15 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
17 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 30: 14.58 ∆E min: 5.8 - max: 21.57 ∆E
613
cd/m²
629
cd/m²
651
cd/m²
604
cd/m²
632
cd/m²
655
cd/m²
604
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
655
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 655 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 629.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.79 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 92 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 632 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Siyah: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.46 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
96% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.209
Motorola Edge 30
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Huawei Nova 9
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
Honor 50
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
Motorola Edge 20
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy A53
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Screen
3%
-36%
-27%
3%
32%
Brightness middle
632
621
-2%
731
16%
479
-24%
718
14%
797
26%
Brightness
630
632
0%
722
15%
480
-24%
730
16%
800
27%
Brightness Distribution
92
96
4%
97
5%
94
2%
92
0%
97
5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.46
1.7
-16%
3.1
-112%
2.06
-41%
1.62
-11%
0.9
38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.32
2.8
16%
5.8
-75%
4.54
-37%
4.21
-27%
2
40%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.6
2.2
15%
4.2
-62%
3.5
-35%
2
23%
1.1
58%
Gamma
2.209 100%
2.17 101%
2.19 100%
2.205 100%
2.156 102%
2.26 97%
CCT
6755 96%
6806 96%
6818 95%
6794 96%
6545 99%
6397 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19681 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

PWM flickering
PWM flickering
0% brightness
0% brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.2 ms).
Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
826 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (824 - 826, n=2)
825 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
790 Points ∼96% -4%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
788 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
787 Points ∼95% -5%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
767 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
740 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1885, n=266, last 2 years)
724 Points ∼88% -12%
Multi-Core
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
3000 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2962 Points ∼99% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (2872 - 2998, n=2)
2935 Points ∼98% +2%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2889 Points ∼96% +1%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2872 Points ∼96%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2785 Points ∼93% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 5538, n=266, last 2 years)
2334 Points ∼78% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1878 Points ∼63% -35%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1119358, n=137, last 2 years)
574303 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (553328 - 582264, n=2)
567796 Points ∼99% +3%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
553328 Points ∼96%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
520706 Points ∼91% -6%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
519177 Points ∼90% -6%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
509185 Points ∼89% -8%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
467593 Points ∼81% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
409976 Points ∼71% -26%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
15194 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (11662 - 15194, n=2)
13428 Points ∼88% -12%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
13296 Points ∼88% -12%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
12076 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11470 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10755 Points ∼71% -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=187, last 2 years)
10372 Points ∼68% -32%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1178, n=78, last 2 years)
760 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (732 - 760, n=2)
746 Points ∼98% +2%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
732 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
678 Points ∼89% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
579 Points ∼76% -21%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5002 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4950 Points ∼99% 0%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4932 Points ∼99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (4768 - 4932, n=2)
4850 Points ∼97% -2%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4809 Points ∼96% -2%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4615 Points ∼92% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1223 - 8753, n=175, last 2 years)
4548 Points ∼91% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3626 Points ∼72% -26%
System
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10940 Points ∼100%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10816 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (10424 - 10940, n=2)
10682 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10455 Points ∼96% -4%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
9880 Points ∼90% -10%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
8751 Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2083 - 19657, n=175, last 2 years)
8027 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7157 Points ∼65% -35%
Memory
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6372 Points ∼100% +34%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6307 Points ∼99% +32%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5234 Points ∼82% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 9044, n=175, last 2 years)
5148 Points ∼81% +8%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4957 Points ∼78% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (4762 - 4763, n=2)
4763 Points ∼75% 0%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4762 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3855 Points ∼60% -19%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 26660, n=175, last 2 years)
8512 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (7516 - 8175, n=2)
7846 Points ∼92% +4%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
7516 Points ∼88%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6763 Points ∼79% -10%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6729 Points ∼79% -10%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6726 Points ∼79% -11%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6659 Points ∼78% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5178 Points ∼61% -31%
Web
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1534 Points ∼100% +2%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1511 Points ∼99%
Honor 50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1509 Points ∼98% 0%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1465 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=175, last 2 years)
1404 Points ∼92% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (1273 - 1511, n=2)
1392 Points ∼91% -8%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1295 Points ∼84% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1210 Points ∼79% -20%
AImark - Score v2.x
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
137968 Points ∼100% +2288%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=156, last 2 years)
54530 Points ∼40% +844%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
  (5777 - 5823, n=2)
5800 Points ∼4% 0%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5777 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4714 Points ∼3% -18%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
768 Points ∼100%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
690 Points ∼90% -10%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
689 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
688 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
621 Points ∼81% -19%
Wild Life Extreme
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
764 Points ∼100%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
695 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
695 Points ∼91% -9%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
694 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
636 Points ∼83% -17%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2831 Points ∼100%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2501 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2500 Points ∼88% -12%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2499 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2275 Points ∼80% -20%
Wild Life Score
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2814 Points ∼100%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2505 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2505 Points ∼89% -11%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2492 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2293 Points ∼81% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3523 Points ∼100% +30%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2718 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2689 Points ∼76% -1%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2588 Points ∼73% -5%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2557 Points ∼73% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5928 Points ∼100%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5370 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5338 Points ∼90% -10%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5302 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3902 Points ∼66% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4810 Points ∼100% +2%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4696 Points ∼98%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4300 Points ∼89% -8%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4299 Points ∼89% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3546 Points ∼74% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4831 Points ∼100% +6%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4677 Points ∼97% +3%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4547 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4166 Points ∼86% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3097 Points ∼64% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6240 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5651 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5637 Points ∼90% -10%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5614 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3982 Points ∼64% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5763 Points ∼100%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5435 Points ∼94% -6%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5375 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5236 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3746 Points ∼65% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4529 Points ∼100% +6%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4439 Points ∼98% +4%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4410 Points ∼97% +3%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4270 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2261 Points ∼50% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8182 Points ∼100%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7276 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7238 Points ∼88% -12%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7224 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5172 Points ∼63% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6798 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6389 Points ∼94% -6%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6358 Points ∼94% -6%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6340 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4021 Points ∼59% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5385 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5036 Points ∼94% -6%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5027 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5018 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3621 Points ∼67% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5807 Points ∼100%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5218 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5213 Points ∼90% -10%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5178 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3939 Points ∼68% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4561 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4501 Points ∼99% +5%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4423 Points ∼97% +3%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4293 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2823 Points ∼62% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7281 Points ∼100%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6639 Points ∼91% -9%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6638 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6458 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4645 Points ∼64% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8605 Points ∼100%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7618 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7608 Points ∼88% -12%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7536 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5510 Points ∼64% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4732 Points ∼100%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4684 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4580 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4224 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2997 Points ∼63% -37%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
116 fps ∼100% +29%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99 fps ∼85% +10%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps ∼78%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
89 fps ∼77% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps ∼70% -10%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼52% -33%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
148 fps ∼100%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
133 fps ∼90% -10%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
133 fps ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
133 fps ∼90% -10%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
133 fps ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
92 fps ∼62% -38%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps ∼100%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
69 fps ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps ∼81% -19%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
68 fps ∼80% -20%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps ∼66% -34%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps ∼89% -11%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps ∼89% -11%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
78 fps ∼88% -12%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
77 fps ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 fps ∼69% -31%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps ∼100%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
51 fps ∼76% -24%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
49 fps ∼73% -27%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
48 fps ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼52% -48%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps ∼90% -10%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps ∼90% -10%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps ∼89% -11%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps ∼60% -40%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps ∼100%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps ∼79% -21%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29 fps ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps ∼74% -26%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
28 fps ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼51% -49%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps ∼100%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
33 fps ∼89% -11%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
33 fps ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps ∼89% -11%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼62% -38%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps ∼100%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps ∼85% -15%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps ∼77% -23%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
19 fps ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps ∼58% -42%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps ∼100%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14 fps ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps ∼93% -7%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps ∼93% -7%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13 fps ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps ∼67% -33%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps ∼100%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps ∼83% -17%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
32 fps ∼80% -20%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30 fps ∼75% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼58% -42%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps ∼100% 0%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps ∼100%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps ∼97% -3%
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps ∼97% -3%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
34 fps ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps ∼67% -33%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
90.283 Points ∼100%
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)
86.8 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
86.2 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (73.7 - 90.3, n=2)
82 Points ∼91% -9%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)
76.1 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (14.8 - 282, n=175, last 2 years)
69.6 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
63.5 Points ∼70% -30%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
58.8 Points ∼65% -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (12.5 - 375, n=164, last 2 years)
67 runs/min ∼100% +1%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
66.48 runs/min ∼99%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
61.5 runs/min ∼92% -7%
Motorola Edge 20 (Chome 95)
61.3 runs/min ∼91% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (53.7 - 66.5, n=2)
60.1 runs/min ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)
51.24 runs/min ∼76% -23%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)
131 Points ∼100% +13%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
116 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
113 Points ∼86% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (102 - 116, n=2)
109 Points ∼83% -6%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)
102 Points ∼78% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 292, n=180, last 2 years)
99.4 Points ∼76% -14%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
96 Points ∼73% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
69 Points ∼53% -41%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
32109 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
31915 Points ∼99% -1%
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)
31783 Points ∼99% -1%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)
31134 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (24488 - 32109, n=2)
28299 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (3905 - 74261, n=189, last 2 years)
25988 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
24159 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
23915 Points ∼74% -26%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 12437, n=186, last 2 years)
2704 ms * ∼100% -103%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
1920.3 ms * ∼71% -44%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
1893 ms * ∼70% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (1335 - 1796, n=2)
1566 ms * ∼58% -17%
Honor 50 (Chrome 96)
1427 ms * ∼53% -7%
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95)
1344 ms * ∼50% -1%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
1335 ms * ∼49%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
1323 ms * ∼49% +1%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Edge 30Huawei Nova 9Honor 50Motorola Edge 20Samsung Galaxy A53Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NEAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
-15%
-30%
-34%
-28%
-7%
-34%
Sequential Read 256KB
1514.62
1030
-32%
984
-35%
1011
-33%
510.1
-66%
944
-38%
1561 ?(1030 - 1898, n=38)
3%
987 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=256, last 2 years)
-35%
Sequential Write 256KB
965.35
759
-21%
609
-37%
471.4
-51%
486.7
-50%
679
-30%
764 ?(233 - 1095, n=38)
-21%
537 ?(11.9 - 1776, n=256, last 2 years)
-44%
Random Read 4KB
241.72
229.6
-5%
245.7
2%
190.2
-21%
229.9
-5%
208.7
-14%
234 ?(126.2 - 322, n=38)
-3%
177.6 ?(13.5 - 390, n=256, last 2 years)
-27%
Random Write 4KB
249.14
239.2
-4%
280.2
12%
210.6
-15%
210.8
-15%
178.8
-28%
234 ?(121.4 - 323, n=38)
-6%
176.8 ?(30.3 - 503, n=257, last 2 years)
-29%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø60.2 (59-61)
; PUBG Mobile; 2.0.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)
; Subway Surfers; 2.36.0: Ø90 (82-91)
Maksimum yük
 45 °C44 °C39.9 °C 
 45.7 °C44 °C40.1 °C 
 46.5 °C43.5 °C39.6 °C 
Maksimum: 46.5 °C
Ortalama: 43.1 °C
39.9 °C44.7 °C47.4 °C
40.4 °C44.6 °C48.4 °C
39.5 °C44.7 °C48.5 °C
Maksimum: 48.5 °C
Ortalama: 44.2 °C
Güç kaynağı  40.3 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 (13.7min) % ∼100% +1%
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.4 (14.9min) % ∼100% +1%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.2 (14.8min) % ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.2 (14.8min) % ∼100% 0%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.8 (16.8min) % ∼99%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor 50
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.8 (4.14min) % ∼100% +1%
Motorola Edge 20
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 (4.14min) % ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 (4.14min) % ∼100% 0%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.1 (4.54min) % ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97.8 (3.75min) % ∼98% -1%
012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø4.57 (4.54-4.59)
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø4.15 (4.14-4.15)
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø4.14 (4.14-4.15)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.81 (3.75-3.84)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø4.15 (4.14-4.17)
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.9 (16.8-17)
Honor 50 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.9 (14.9-15)
Motorola Edge 20 Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.9 (14.8-14.9)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.7-13.7)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø14.9 (14.8-15)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.638.52534.835.53132.630.24037.135.75042.839.96332.727.78022.927.410020.232.712517.936.816015.943.920012472501150.531513.456.54001160.250012.666.563012.571.580011.870.4100011.477.7125011.576160010.577.320009.973.5250010.671.9315011.972.2400012.865.7500013.964.2630014.465.2800015.266.2100001667.81250015.965.11600016.648.7SPL25.384.6N0.657.5median 12.6median 65.7Delta29.929.532.933.134.527.426.731.329.130.33329.626.624.120.320.721.417.635.114.845.912.349.212.851.110.454960.911.365.214.465.317.170.21473.610.4709.468.810.661.211.46113.662.713.777.115.375.615.47716.676.317.669.217.368.617.655.226.384.50.758median 14median 65.22.89hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Edge 30Motorola Edge 20
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Edge 30 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Motorola Edge 20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.2 / 1.5 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 3.6 / 7.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Edge 30
4020 mAh
Huawei Nova 9
4300 mAh
Honor 50
4300 mAh
Motorola Edge 20
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
4250 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-39%
-54%
-7%
-15%
-15%
-3%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.96
-7%
1.02
-13%
1
-11%
0.9
-0%
0.78
13%
0.95 ?(0.9 - 1, n=2)
-6%
0.881 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=197, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Average *
1.2
2.47
-106%
2.98
-148%
1.3
-8%
1.3
-8%
1.97
-64%
1.2 ?(1.2 - 1.2, n=2)
-0%
1.61 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=197, last 2 years)
-34%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
2.55
-70%
3.11
-107%
1.6
-7%
1.6
-7%
1.99
-33%
1.5 ?(1.5 - 1.5, n=2)
-0%
1.815 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=197, last 2 years)
-21%
Load Average *
3.6
3.85
-7%
3.59
-0%
3.9
-8%
5.7
-58%
3.23
10%
3.9 ?(3.6 - 4.2, n=2)
-8%
4.35 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=197, last 2 years)
-21%
Load Maximum *
7.1
7.43
-5%
7.12
-0%
7.2
-1%
7.3
-3%
7.08
-0%
7.25 ?(7.1 - 7.4, n=2)
-2%
7.2 ?(3.56 - 11.7, n=197, last 2 years)
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G: Ø4.39 (1.649-7.82)
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G: Ø3.88 (1.16-7.96)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G: Ø3.65 (1.007-8.03)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.21.41.61.92.12.42.62.83.13.33.53.844.24.5Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.19 (3.86-4.55)
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.99 (3.04-4.7)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.68 (3.47-4.19)
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G; Idle 1min: Ø1.148 (0.912-1.516)
Honor 50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 1min: Ø1.585 (1.497-1.802)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 1min: Ø1.169 (1.054-1.294)
Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
26h 44min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 42min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
4h 28min
Motorola Edge 30
4020 mAh
Huawei Nova 9
4300 mAh
Honor 50
4300 mAh
Motorola Edge 20
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
4250 mAh
Battery Runtime
2%
42%
-4%
24%
6%
Reader / Idle
1604
1540
-4%
2431
52%
1648
3%
H.264
1002
1105
10%
1146
14%
1215
21%
WiFi v1.3
638
652
2%
907
42%
716
12%
886
39%
705
11%
Load
268
183
-32%
246
-8%
233
-13%

Artılar

+ nagyon vékony és könnyű készülékház
+ gyors és stabil WLAN
+ alap Android
+ világos és színhű AMOLED kijelző
+ 144Hz-es képkockasebesség
+ nappali fényben jó kamera
+ sztereó hangszórók
+ mellékelt hálózati adapter

Eksiler

- nincs vezeték nélküli töltés
- középszerű üzemidő
- nincs microSD foglalat

Összegzés:

In review: Motorola Edge 30. Review device provided by Motorola Germany.
In review: Motorola Edge 30. Review device provided by Motorola Germany.

A Motorola Edge 30 egy jó középkategóriás telefon extra vékony házban, és 155 grammos pehelykönnyű súlyával megelőzi a versenytársakat. Akik különösen vékony és könnyű telefont szeretnének, azok megfelelő jelöltet találnak ebben a 6,5 hüvelykes modellben.

A látszat ellenére az Edge 30 a teljesítményt tekintve nem könnyűsúlyú. A Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, a 8 GB RAM és a 128 GB tárhelynek köszönhetően jól felszerelt a mindennapi használatra, és valamivel gyorsabb, mint egyik fő riválisa, a Samsung Galaxy A53 5G. Az Edge 30 még egy lépéssel tovább is megy az AMOLED képernyőjének 144 Hz-es képkockasebességével. További pluszpontok az alap Android 12, a gyors és stabil WLAN, a sztereó hangszórók és az 50 MP-es kamera, amely nappali fényben jó fotókat készít.

A Motorola Edge 30 egy vékony és könnyű középkategóriás telefon 144 Hz-es kijelzővel és jó teljesítménnyel, de kissé rövid üzemidővel.

Az Edge 20 egyik fő kritikája az Edge 30-ra is érvényes: az akkumulátor üzemideje legfeljebb átlagosnak mondható. A felhasználók tehát nem számíthatnak arra, hogy a telefon valós használat mellett mindig egy napnál tovább bírja. A vásárlóknak emellett nélkülözniük kell a microSD foglalatot és az Edge 30 vezeték nélküli töltésének lehetőségét is.

A Motorola Edge 30-nak jó alternatívája lehet például a Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, amely majdnem ugyanolyan gyors, valamivel világosabb 120 Hz-es AMOLED panellel rendelkezik, és valamivel olcsóbb is. Még olcsóbb a Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE, amely Snapdragon 778G-vel fut, és 90 Hz-es AMOLED képernyőt használ.

Ár és Elérhetőség

A nemrég tesztelt Motorola Moto G82 5G-hez hasonlóan az Edge 30 elérhetősége is szórványosnak tűnik. A vásárlóknak ezért ajánlott közvetlenül a Motorola helyi weboldalán keresztül tájékozódni. Ezen helyeknek a listája elérhető itt. A hely kiválasztása után egyszerűen beírjuk az Edge 30-at a keresősávba. 

Mi például azt találtuk, hogy a telefon már elérhető az Egyesült Királyságban, Franciaországban, Kolumbiában, Indiában, Malajziában és Brazíliában (a lista nem teljes). Az elérhető konfigurációk azonban eltérőek lehetnek; egyes országokban csak egy (8/128 vagy 8/256) lehet a kínálatban. Néhány másik országban mindkét konfigurációt kínálják.

Motorola Edge 30 - 08/30/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

İşcilik
83%
Klavye
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
93%
Bağlanılabilirlik
50 / 70 → 72%
Ağırlık
92%
Batarya
89%
Görüntü
88%
Oyun performansı
56 / 64 → 87%
Uygulama performansı
81 / 86 → 94%
Isınma
80%
Ses
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
77%
Ortalama
79%
86%
Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Motorola Edge 30 smartphone rövid értékelés: Pehelysúly 144 Hz-es kijelzővel
Manuel Masiero, 2022-09- 2 (Update: 2022-09- 2)