Notebookcheck

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G akıllı telefon İnceleme - İyi ana kameralı 5G telefon

Preferences without flexibility. Oppo, Reno4 Z 5G ile düşük fiyatlı bir 5G telefonu piyasaya sürdü. 120 Hz ekran ve yaklaşık 300 Euro (~ 300 $) fiyatı çekici görünüyor, ancak Çin akıllı telefonuyla ilgili ayrıntılı incelememize daha yakından bakıyoruz.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (Çeviren Aslinur Sarica), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Oppo Reno 4 Z 5G
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G (Reno Seri)
İşlemci
MediaTek Dimensity 800 8 x 2 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Grafik kartı
ARM Mali-G57 MP4
Bellek
8192 MB 
Görüntü
6.57 inç 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, Capacitive touch screen, IPS, parlak: evet, 120 Hz
Harddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 128GB, 112 GB Boş
Bağlantılar
1 USB 2.0, Ses çıkışları: 3.5mm, 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, USB-C
Network
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G,3G,4G(B1/​2/3/​4/​5/​7/​8/12/​17/18/19/20/26/28/38/39/40/41/66), 5G (n1/​3/5/​7/8/20/28/​38/​40/41/​77/​78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 8.1 x 163.8 x 75.5
Batarya
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
İşletim sistemi
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​30fps, f/1.7, 26mm, 1/2.0", 0.8µm) + 8MP wide angle lens (f/2.2, 119˚, 1/4.0", 1.12µm) + 2MP dop (f/2.4) + 2MP b/w (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (videos @1080p/​30fps, f/2.0, 26mm, 1/3.06", 1.0µm) + 2MP dop (f/2.4)
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: mono speaker, Klavye: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, headset, SIM tool, silicone bumper, 24 Ay Garanti, fanless
Ağırlık
184 g, Güç kaynağı: 102 g
Fiyat
300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Bewertung
Rating Version
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
81 %7
02/2021
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4
184 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2400x1080
82 %7
01/2021
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
215 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80 %7
01/2021
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
193 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"1600x720
80 %7
08/2020
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
SD 765, Adreno 620
207 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080

Durum, özellikler ve işlem - Çin telefonunda çok fazla RAM

Oppo, Reno4 Z 5G için 300 Euro'nun biraz altında istiyor. Karşılığında, elde iyi hissettiren plastik bir kasa elde edersiniz ve Reno 4 Z 5G 184 gramda o kadar da ağır değildir. Mürekkep Siyahı ve Çiğ Beyazı mevcuttur, Mürekkep Siyahı ise oldukça mavimsi görünür. Arka, ışığı birçok yönden kırar ve bu nedenle oldukça sofistike görünür. Enine düzenlenmiş ana lenslere sahip kamera modülü abartılı ve şıktır. Kasa, basınç açısından biraz daha kararlı olabilir, ancak genel olarak yüksek kaliteli görünüyor 8 GB RAM bir ifadedir ve aynı fiyat aralığındaki bazı karşılaştırma cihazlarının neredeyse iki katıdır. 128 GB'lık yığın depolama artık alışılmadık bir şey değil, ancak 300 Euro'nun biraz altında iyi bir konfigürasyon. Ancak, depolama microSD kart ile genişletilemez. NFC gemide olduğu için mobil ödeme hizmetlerini de kullanabilirsiniz. Wi-Fi 5 de mevcuttur, ancak Reno4 Z 5G, referans yönlendirici Netgear Nighthawk AX12 ile testimizde yalnızca ortalama veri hızlarına ulaşır. 5G zaten adında ve hızlı mobil standardı her iki SIM kartla da kullanılabilir.Yazılım Android 10'a dayalıdır ve güvenlik yamaları test sırasında günceldir.Kasanın sağ tarafında bir parmak izi sensörü bulunur . Ne yazık ki, kenarları kasaya tam olarak uymuyor, bu da kalite izlenimini biraz düşürüyor. Bununla birlikte, saklanan parmakların tanınması çok güvenilir ve hızlıdır. Bekleme modundayken bile akıllı telefonun kilidini açmak için parmağınızı üzerine koymanız yeterlidir. Reno4 Z'nin 120 Hz ekranı, çalışmayı çok sorunsuz hale getirir.

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G

Boyut karşılaştırması

168 mm 74 mm 9 mm 207 g165.38 mm 76.8 mm 9 mm 215 g164.4 mm 75.9 mm 8.6 mm 193 g163.8 mm 75.5 mm 8.1 mm 184 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
667 (339min - 692max) MBit/s ∼100% +93%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
666 (646min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100% +92%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
346 (315min - 357max) MBit/s ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
329 (307min - 340max) MBit/s ∼49% -5%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
646 (590min - 656max) MBit/s ∼100% +95%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼85% +66%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
332 (316min - 339max) MBit/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
328 (323min - 332max) MBit/s ∼51% -1%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (315-357)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø332 (316-339)

Kameralar - ana kamera hui, geri kalanı naja

Recording front camera
Recording front camera
Recording front camera "Portrait mode
Recording front camera "Portrait mode

Oppo telefonun arkasında 4 lens var, ancak bunlardan yalnızca ikisi fotoğraf çekmek için kullanılabilir, diğer ikisi yalnızca destekleyici veriler sağlar. 48 megapiksel ana kamera, varsayılan olarak 4 pikseli bir araya getirerek 12 megapiksel resimlerle sonuçlanır, ancak daha yüksek bir pozlama sağlar Ana kameradan gelen resimler aslında oldukça iyi görünüyor, keskin ve oldukça ayrıntılı. Ortam resminde bazı lekeli yüzeyler fark ediliyor ve burada bireysel ayrıntılar da biraz bulanık görünüyor, ancak sonuç genel olarak da iyi. Düşük ışıkta ve yüksek kontrastlarda kamera, ortamı oldukça detaylı bir şekilde yeniden üretebildiğini de gösteriyor. Test laboratuarındaki gerçek düşük ışık koşullarında, resimlerin ayrıntı seviyesi önemli ölçüde azalır ve optimum aydınlatmada hafif kontrast zayıflıkları ve bulanıklık vardır. Bununla birlikte, genel olarak, kamera fiyat seviyesi için oldukça iyi Diğer yandan geniş açılı kamera biraz bulanık fotoğraflar çekiyor ve enstantane çekimler için daha uygun Videolar en fazla 4K ve 30 fps olarak kaydedilebilir. Hareketli görüntülerde kontrast açısından özellikle güçlü olmayan hafif renk sapmaları var. Aksi takdirde kayıt burada da iyi seviyede Ön tarafta iki kamera lensi var ama sadece bir tanesi fotoğraflar için kullanılabiliyor, ikincisi portrelerde bulanıklık hesaplaması için kullanılıyor. Standart özçekimler tamam, ancak portre modu ince yapılarla zor anlar yaşıyor.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptobjektiv BlumeHauptobjektiv UmgebungHauptobjektiv Low LightUltraweitwinkel
click to load images
ColorChecker
23.8 ∆E
32.1 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
30 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
37.7 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Reno4 Z 5G: 28.45 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 39.23 ∆E
ColorChecker
18.9 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
20 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
11 ∆E
17 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Reno4 Z 5G: 14.62 ∆E min: 5.87 - max: 21.64 ∆E

Ekran - Oppo Reno'da 120 Hz ekran

Subpixel recording
Subpixel recording

Reno4 Z 5G'nin 120 Hz ekrana sahip olması harika bir şey. Parlaklık açısından IPS ekranı rekabete eşit, ancak aynı zamanda oldukça güçlü renk sapmalarına da sahip.CalMAN yazılımı ile yaptığımız testte de hafif mavi bir ton ortaya çıktı.

450
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 462 cd/m² Ortalama: 438.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.6 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 88 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 462 cd/m²
Kontrast: 797:1 (Siyah: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.83 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 6.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.227
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.57
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.60
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70
Response Times
-36%
68%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 (23, 19)
52 (27.6, 24.4)
-24%
10 (5, 5)
76%
34 (17, 17)
19%
Response Time Black / White *
22 (11, 11)
32.4 (16, 16.4)
-47%
9 (5, 4)
59%
26 (15, 11)
-18%
PWM Frequency
2358 (42)
242.7
Screen
34%
26%
33%
Brightness middle
462
606
31%
466
1%
461
0%
Brightness
439
574
31%
462
5%
458
4%
Brightness Distribution
88
89
1%
85
-3%
93
6%
Black Level *
0.58
0.44
24%
0.52
10%
Contrast
797
1377
73%
887
11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.83
2.4
50%
2.06
57%
1.01
79%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.1
5.3
35%
6.14
24%
2.1
74%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.3
4.5
29%
1.8
71%
1.5
76%
Gamma
2.227 99%
2.21 100%
2.105 105%
2.25 98%
CCT
7556 86%
6224 104%
6444 101%
6701 97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / 20%
47% / 36%
17% / 26%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9687 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color space
CalMAN color space
CalMAN Saturation
CalMAN Saturation

Performans, emisyonlar ve pil ömrü - küçük pil, iyi çalışma süresi

Oldukça yeni MediaTek Dimensity 800, diğer birçok orta sınıf SoC'nin aksine dört yüksek performanslı çekirdek sunuyor, ancak maksimum 2 GHz saat biraz daha düşük. Yalnızca iki veya bir çekirdek kullanıldığında optimize edilmiş uygulamalarda performans etkileyicidir, ancak aynı zamanda biraz daha düşüktür. Ancak birçok uygulama bundan faydalanmalıdır. Her durumda, Dimensity 800, kıyaslamalarda oldukça hızlıdır ve bu fiyat aralığındaki diğer yaygın SoC'lere ayak uydurabilir. Bu fiyat aralığındaki bellek, özellikle yazarken diğer cihazlara göre biraz daha yavaştır. Kasa yük altında 46.9 ° C'ye kadar ısınır ki bu açıkça fark edilir. Sıcaklık gelişimi, yüksek ortam sıcaklıklarında da rahatsız edici hale gelebilir. Alt kenardaki mono hoparlör bir ses mucizesi değil, ancak fiyat aralığı için sorun değil. 4.000 mAh'lik küçük pil, kötü bir iş yapmaz ve Moto G 5G Plus'a neredeyse ayak uydurabilir, ancak ikincisi çok daha güçlü bir bataryaya sahiptir. . WLAN testimizde 15:03 saat, şarj olmadan birkaç günlük çalışma için yeterli olacaktır. Şarj cihazı büyük ve ağır olmasına rağmen, yine de yalnızca 18 watt'lık maksimum şarj gücü getiriyor. Bu, cihaz boşken 1:30 ile 2 saat arasındaki şarj süreleri için yeterlidir.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
2143 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2009 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1979 Points ∼92% -8%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1954 Points ∼91% -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
2143 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=182)
1939 Points ∼90% -10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
523 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
658 Points ∼100% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
658 Points ∼100% +26%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
596 Points ∼91% +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
523 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (63 - 1604, n=182)
560 Points ∼85% +7%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
7511 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7547 Points ∼86% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8063 Points ∼92% +7%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
8756 Points ∼100% +17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
7511 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=580)
6148 Points ∼70% -18%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
9674 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8853 Points ∼89% -8%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
9914 Points ∼100% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
9674 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=728)
6781 Points ∼68% -30%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3626 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3649 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3636 Points ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3457 Points ∼95% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
3626 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=587)
2308 Points ∼63% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3353 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2823 Points ∼84% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2845 Points ∼85% -15%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3165 Points ∼94% -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
3353 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=587)
2344 Points ∼70% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3410 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2973 Points ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2990 Points ∼88% -12%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3236 Points ∼95% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
3410 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=588)
2154 Points ∼63% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3593 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3651 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3597 Points ∼99% 0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3512 Points ∼96% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
3593 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=614)
2211 Points ∼61% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4497 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4263 Points ∼88% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4298 Points ∼88% -4%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4865 Points ∼100% +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
4497 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=616)
3162 Points ∼65% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4259 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4110 Points ∼92% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4120 Points ∼92% -3%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4484 Points ∼100% +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
4259 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=616)
2596 Points ∼58% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3909 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3542 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3588 Points ∼92% -8%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3445 Points ∼88% -12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
3909 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=663)
2166 Points ∼55% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3145 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2617 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2667 Points ∼85% -15%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2963 Points ∼94% -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
3145 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=663)
1909 Points ∼61% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3288 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2778 Points ∼84% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2828 Points ∼86% -14%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3015 Points ∼92% -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
3288 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=664)
1810 Points ∼55% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3855 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3523 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3607 Points ∼94% -6%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3498 Points ∼91% -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
3855 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5301, n=706)
2042 Points ∼53% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4722 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4072 Points ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4189 Points ∼89% -11%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4654 Points ∼99% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
4722 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=705)
2563 Points ∼54% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4497 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2825 Points ∼63% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4044 Points ∼90% -10%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4401 Points ∼98% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
4497 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=708)
2184 Points ∼49% -51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
21499 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20076 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19708 Points ∼92% -8%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
20156 Points ∼94% -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
21499 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=851)
16090 Points ∼75% -25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
37882 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
55911 Points ∼89% +48%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
56286 Points ∼90% +49%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
62756 Points ∼100% +66%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
37882 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=849)
29337 Points ∼47% -23%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
32396 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
40032 Points ∼94% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
39850 Points ∼93% +23%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
42735 Points ∼100% +32%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
32396 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=849)
22458 Points ∼53% -31%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
12 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps ∼52% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
21 fps ∼100% +75%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
11 fps ∼52% -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
12 fps ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=379)
12 fps ∼57% 0%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
8.2 fps ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.4 fps ∼89% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7.4 fps ∼89% -10%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
7.5 fps ∼90% -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
8.2 fps ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=377)
8.36 fps ∼100% +2%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
20 fps ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
17 fps ∼52% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +65%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
18 fps ∼55% -10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
20 fps ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 64, n=383)
17.9 fps ∼54% -10%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
22 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
20 fps ∼91% -9%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
21 fps ∼95% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
22 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=383)
20.5 fps ∼93% -7%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5GXiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5GSamsung Galaxy A42 5GMotorola Moto G 5G PlusAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
50%
48%
-3%
3%
-51%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.2 (8.4 - 72.4, n=42)
51.8 (1.7 - 87.1, n=572)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
87.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
87.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.4 (13.4 - 88.3, n=42)
69.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=572)
Random Write 4KB
125.7
162.33
29%
147.7
18%
119.3
-5%
115 (18.2 - 290, n=74)
-9%
41.8 (0.14 - 319, n=947)
-67%
Random Read 4KB
125.2
176.59
41%
168.5
35%
138.14
10%
144 (92.6 - 239, n=74)
15%
64.5 (1.59 - 325, n=947)
-48%
Sequential Write 256KB
201
463.5
131%
476
137%
180.21
-10%
250 (182 - 511, n=74)
24%
144 (2.99 - 1321, n=947)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB
934.9
938.14
0%
963
3%
885.34
-5%
779 (427 - 999, n=74)
-17%
371 (12.1 - 2037, n=947)
-60%

Sıcaklık

Maksimum yük
 46.9 °C42.4 °C40 °C 
 46 °C42.2 °C39.6 °C 
 45.6 °C41.4 °C40 °C 
Maksimum: 46.9 °C
Ortalama: 42.7 °C
38.3 °C41.8 °C42.4 °C
38.6 °C41.5 °C46.3 °C
38.8 °C42.3 °C45.7 °C
Maksimum: 46.3 °C
Ortalama: 41.7 °C
Güç kaynağı  40.2 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.


Heatmap Front
Heatmap Front
Heatmap back side
Heatmap back side

Loudspeaker

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.934.22539.334.93131.130.84033.531.35034.536.56325.424.98019.219.310018.518.212516.819.916014.928.420011.634.325010.941.931511.648.240010.75550010.76063010.262.380017.765.2100015.271.3125010.768.416009.569.5200010.471250010.671.7315010.969.2400012.270.3500012.671.5630013.267.8800013.865.11000014.569.51250015.461.91600016.147.3SPL67.566.75966.424.981.3N21.119.91220.40.648.8median 12.2median 65.1Delta2.312.538.946.339.337.531.128.433.533.134.537.925.428.119.219.518.519.416.823.814.936.911.643.110.948.311.653.710.758.810.761.810.261.317.764.715.269.810.769.49.57110.470.110.66910.966.412.267.912.673.713.273.913.877.514.570.915.46016.156.966.424.982.920.40.654.1median 12.2median 64.72.39.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Reno4 Z 5GSamsung Galaxy A42 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A42 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Battery life

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
4820 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
5000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
903
1096
21%
967
7%
914
1%
719 (223 - 2636, n=818)
-20%
Batarya ömrü
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 03min

Artılar

+ çok fazla RAM
+ hızlı 120 Hz ekran
+ nispeten hafif
+ iyi ana kamera
+ yüksek performans
+ iyi pil ömrü

Eksiler

- yük altında yüksek sıcaklık artışı
- geniş açılı ve ön kamerada orta kalite
- Ekranda mavi renk

Verdict - Well equipped, but not for everyone

In review: Oppo Reno4 Z 5G. Test device provided by Oppo Germany.
In review: Oppo Reno4 Z 5G. Test device provided by Oppo Germany.

The Oppo Reno 4 Z 5G offers a 120 Hz screen for just under 300 Euros, but it is not too bright and also has some catching up to do in terms of color accuracy. It also has a main camera that can take decent pictures. However, all other camera lenses on the device cannot be used for taking pictures or only deliver mediocre quality. This means that the Oppo Reno4 Z 5G is a good choice if you value a good main camera, but not if you want flexibility.

The battery is relatively low in capacity, which makes the device light and does not affect the runtime that much. It is also not that bad that the charger cannot provide such a high charging power. Oppo has apparently optimized well here.

The Oppo Reno4 Z 5G is a cheap 5G phone with a good main camera.

The performance is also on class level and those who want a physical fingerprint sensor will also get their money's worth here.

The somewhat less resistant casing is a bit annoying, and you can certainly get even faster Wi-Fi in other devices. Thus, it depends on the user's demands whether the Oppo Reno4 Z 5G is a good choice. However, it definitely has some advantages with a lot of working memory and otherwise good equipment.

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G - 01/02/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt

İşcilik
84%
Klavye
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
93%
Bağlanılabilirlik
48 / 70 → 68%
Ağırlık
89%
Batarya
91%
Görüntü
84%
Oyun performansı
36 / 64 → 56%
Uygulama performansı
71 / 86 → 82%
Isınma
84%
Ses
100%
Audio
64 / 90 → 71%
Camera
59%
Ortalama
74%
81%
Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Oppo Reno4 Z 5G akıllı telefon İnceleme - İyi ana kameralı 5G telefon
Florian Schmitt, 2021-02- 6 (Update: 2021-02- 6)
Aslinur Sarica
Translator: Aslinur Sarica - Translator