Notebookcheck

HP Omen 15 dizüstü bilgisayar incelemesi: Güçlü AMD işlemci Intel'i titretiyor

Full of surprises. HP Omen 15'in AMD sürümü, kağıt üzerinde makul bir fiyata güçlü bileşenlerle puan alıyor. Test konfigürasyonunda GeForce RTX 2060'a bir Ryzen 7 4800H eşlik ediyor. Burada soğutma sisteminin oynayıp oynamadığını ve 15 inçlik cihazın başka hangi güçlü ve zayıf yönlerine sahip olduğunu öğrenin.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (Çeviren Aslinur Sarica), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

HP'nin Omen 15'i çok geniş bir donanım portföyüne sahiptir. Yalnızca çeşitli Intel modelleri değil, aynı zamanda birkaç AMD çeşidi de vardır. Grafik kartı olarak Nvidia'nın Turing neslinden orta sınıf veya yüksek kaliteli bir çip kullanılır (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - RTX 2070). En iyi fiyat-performans oranlarından biri şu anda bizim tarafımızdan test edilen Omen 15-en0375ng tarafından yaklaşık 1.260 Euro karşılığında sunulmaktadır (~ 1530 $, başlangıçta belirtildiği gibi bir Ryzen 7 4800H ve GeForce RTX 2060 içerir). Oluşturulan resimler, 1.920 x 1.080 piksellik mat bir IPS panelinde görüntülenir. Ek olarak, çift kanal modunda 2x 8 GB DDR4-3,200 RAM ve yerden tasarruf sağlayan M.2 formatında 512 GB NVMe SSD vardır. Paket, işletim sistemi olarak Windows 10 Home 64 bit ile yuvarlanır.

HP Omen 15-en0375ng
İşlemci
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 8 x 2.9 - 4.2 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Renoir (Zen 2)
Grafik kartı
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6144 MB, Çekirdek: 960 MHz, Bellek: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 452.41, Optimus
Bellek
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, Dual Channel
Görüntü
15.60 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE0852, IPS, Full-HD, parlak: hayır, 60 Hz
Anakart
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Harddisk
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, 512 GB 
, M.2 NVMe
Ses kartı
Realtek ALC245 @ AMD K17.6 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller
Bağlantılar
4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: Combo (Headset/Mic), Kart okuyucular: SD
Network
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 23 x 358 x 240
Batarya
70.9 Wh Lithium-Ion, 6 Cells
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: 2.0 Bang & Olufsen, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, 200 W Power Supply, Setup Guide, Command Center, 24 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
2.16 kg, Güç kaynağı: 525 g
Fiyat
1260 EUR
Bağlantılar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Omen 15-en0375ng'nin rakipleri arasında Schenker XMG Core 15, Asus TUF A15, Acer Predator Triton 300, Aorus 5 KB ve Lenovo Legion 5 gibi RTX 2060'a sahip diğer 15 inçlik bütçeli oyuncular yer alıyor. Bu dizüstü bilgisayarların her biri tabloda karşılaştırma cihazları olarak görünür.

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83 %
02/2021
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.2 kg23 mm15.60"1920x1080
82 %
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83 %
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.2 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
82 %
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.1 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
84 %
Aorus 5 KB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.1 kg28 mm15.60"1920x1080
83 %
07/2020
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.5 kg26.1 mm15.60"1920x1080

Şasi temelde birkaç ay önce test ettiğimiz Omen 15-ek0456ng ile aynıdır, bu nedenle şasiyi, ekipmanı ve giriş cihazlarını tekrar analiz etmekten kaçınırız. Ancak modeller tamamen aynı değil. Örneğin, AMD sürümünde kırmızı yerine beyaz klavye etiketi veya aydınlatması vardır. Alıcılar ayrıca Thunderbolt 3 bağlantı noktası olmadan da yapmak zorunda kalacak.

HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15

Boyut karşılaştırması

363.1 mm 259.6 mm 26.1 mm 2.5 kg361 mm 258 mm 28 mm 2.1 kg359 mm 256 mm 24.9 mm 2.2 kg363 mm 254 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg358 mm 240 mm 23 mm 2.2 kg359.8 mm 245.8 mm 19.9 mm 2 kg

SDCardreader

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 218, n=314)
95.4 MB/s ∼100% +34%
Aorus 5 KB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼80% +7%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
71 MB/s ∼74%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36 MB/s ∼38% -49%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=312)
112 MB/s ∼100% +27%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼79%
Aorus 5 KB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼77% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37 MB/s ∼33% -58%

İletişim

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1640 MBit/s ∼100% +203%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1380 MBit/s ∼84% +155%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1380 MBit/s ∼84% +155%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
880 (772min - 916max) MBit/s ∼54% +62%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1670, n=378)
777 MBit/s ∼47% +43%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
630 (571min - 641max) MBit/s ∼38% +16%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
542 MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1380 MBit/s ∼100% +115%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1230 MBit/s ∼89% +92%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1220 MBit/s ∼88% +90%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=378)
714 MBit/s ∼52% +11%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
662 (553min - 769max) MBit/s ∼48% +3%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
642 MBit/s ∼47%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
566 (37min - 647max) MBit/s ∼41% -12%

Web kamerası

ColorChecker
11.3 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
22 ∆E
24 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
17 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
15 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen 15-en0375ng: 17.92 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 27.71 ∆E

Görüntüle

Doğrudan en büyük hayal kırıklıklarından birine geçelim: ekran. Intel varyantı testte 144 Hz'lik iyi bir panel ile gösteriş yaparken, AMD sürümü sadece vasat bir 60 Hz panele sahip.

279
cd/m²
269
cd/m²
268
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
268
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
BOE0852
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 297 cd/m² Ortalama: 274.7 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 88 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 297 cd/m²
Kontrast: 900:1 (Siyah: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.54 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 4.66
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
58% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.066
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
BOE0852, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
LM156LF-1F02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
BOE08FB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Aorus 5 KB
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Response Times
61%
-14%
4%
50%
16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
30.4 (16.4, 14)
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
68%
34 (16, 18)
-12%
29.2 (14.4, 14.8)
4%
14.4 (7.6, 6.8)
53%
26 (12, 14)
14%
Response Time Black / White *
20.8 (11.6, 9.2)
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
54%
24 (13, 11)
-15%
20 (9.6, 10.4)
4%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
46%
17 (8, 9)
18%
PWM Frequency
200 (99)
Screen
0%
1%
-8%
33%
0%
Brightness middle
297
312
5%
280
-6%
279
-6%
318
7%
301
1%
Brightness
275
290
5%
254
-8%
257
-7%
298
8%
277
1%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
88
0%
89
1%
87
-1%
77
-12%
Black Level *
0.33
0.2
39%
0.15
55%
0.31
6%
0.3
9%
0.26
21%
Contrast
900
1560
73%
1867
107%
900
0%
1060
18%
1158
29%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.54
4.84
-7%
5.89
-30%
5.84
-29%
2.49
45%
5.12
-13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
18.92
13.85
27%
19
-0%
21.8
-15%
5.06
73%
8.86
53%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.66
1.77
62%
4.79
-3%
4.54
3%
1.53
67%
4.88
-5%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.1
9
-329%
4.08
-94%
3.1
-48%
1.6
24%
3.47
-65%
Gamma
2.066 106%
2.105 105%
2.33 94%
2.116 104%
2.211 100%
2.37 93%
CCT
6291 103%
8099 80%
7303 89%
6577 99%
6714 97%
7062 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
40
68
70%
37
-7%
41
3%
65
63%
37
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58
92
59%
58
0%
59
2%
89
53%
57
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
31% / 10%
-7% / -1%
-2% / -6%
42% / 36%
8% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Tepki süresinin yanı sıra, kontrast da çok daha kötü. AMD modelinin 1400: 1'den fazlası yerine yalnızca 900: 1 oranı vardır. Intel modeli, renk doğruluğu, siyah değeri veya parlaklık gibi diğer disiplinlerde de genellikle öndedir. Omen 15-en0375ng, yetersiz parlaklığı nedeniyle (yaklaşık 275 cd / m²) dış mekan kullanımı için pek uygun değildir.

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

Bununla birlikte, küçük renk alanı gözümüzdeki en büyük dezavantajdır:% 58 sRGB ve% 40 AdobeRGB, oldukça soluk ve farklılaşmamış resimlerle sonuçlanır. İyi görüş açısı kararlılığı, bu eksikliği ancak bir dereceye kadar telafi edebilir. Sonuç olarak, görüntü kalitesi dizüstü bilgisayarın fiyatına adil davranmıyor. Bütçe ürünü veya lüks bir makine olup olmadığına bakılmaksızın: Oyun dizüstü bilgisayarları için en az 300 cd / m² parlaklığa, en az 1000: 1 kontrasta ve en az% 80 sRGB kapsamına sahip yüksek kaliteli bir panel bekliyoruz - ve 120 Hz üstü 1.000 Euro için (~ 1214 $).

HP Omen 15 vs sRGB (58%)
HP Omen 15 vs sRGB (58%)
HP Omen 15 vs AdobeRGB (40%)
HP Omen 15 vs AdobeRGB (40%)

Ancak HP, düşük performansında yalnız değil. Schenker Core 15 ve Aorus 5 KB haricinde, yarışmanın görüntüleri de arzulanan çok şey bırakıyor. Dikkat:% 100 parlaklığın altında, ekran 200 Hz ile titriyor ve bu da hassas kişiler için sorunlara neden olabilir.

Backlight
Backlight
Subpixel
Subpixel
Viewpoint
Viewpoint

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9687 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Test conditions

Tuning fans can let off steam in the pre-installed Command Center. Besides system monitoring, the tool also offers a network booster and performance control. The latter includes three profiles that affect the performance and the temperatures or volume. Our tests were always performed with the standard mode, which is supposed to be suitable for all task types and is active out of the box. The fans always ran in automatic mode (see screenshot #3).

Command Center
Command Center
Command Center

Power

Although it is a budget device in terms of price, the Omen 15-en0375ng definitely belongs to the high-end segment. This is mainly due to the strong eight-core processor, which rarely has advantages over a fast four- or six-core in games so far, but shows its muscles in specialized applications and generally has more future-proofing.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark

Processor

The benchmarks impressively prove that AMD is currently setting the tone in the CPU sector and has overtaken Intel. Thanks to its many cores, the Ryzen 7 4800H, which can process up to 16 threads simultaneously via SMT, sprints about 50% past the Core i7-10750H, which is very popular among gaming laptops, in multi-core applications like Cinebench R15. The lead over the Core i5-10300H, for example in the Legion 5 15IMH05H, is even around 100%.

01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720173017401750176017701780179018001810182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930Tooltip
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1886 (1812.99-1909.31)
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1866 (1840.26-1926.13)
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1753 (1601.6-1850.14)
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1209 (1180.53-1317.18)
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1145 (1045.12-1193.85)

Although the performance drops by a few percent under prolonged load, the Omen 15-en0375ng also cuts a good figure in the Cinebench loop. The clock is roughly on par with the 4800H competitor Schenker Core 15, whereas the Asus TUF A15 has to deal with a strongly fluctuating Turbo.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
203 Points ∼100% +8%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
199 Points ∼98% +6%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
188 Points ∼93%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
187 Points ∼92% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
187 Points ∼92% -1%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
186 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 238, n=654)
164 Points ∼81% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1926 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1909 (1812.99min - 1909.31max) Points ∼99%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1850 Points ∼96% -3%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
1317 (1180.53min - 1317.18max) Points ∼68% -31%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
1194 (1045.12min - 1193.85max) Points ∼62% -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=662)
961 Points ∼50% -50%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
898 Points ∼47% -53%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
485.9 Seconds * ∼100% -88%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
388 Seconds * ∼80% -50%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
372 Seconds * ∼77% -44%
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 901, n=119)
368 Seconds * ∼76% -42%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
262.5 Seconds * ∼54% -1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
259 Seconds * ∼53%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
255 Seconds * ∼52% +2%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
50075 MIPS ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
48326 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
45679 MIPS ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (3034 - 75612, n=120)
38885 MIPS ∼78% -22%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
35797 MIPS ∼71% -29%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
34772 MIPS ∼69% -31%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
24635 MIPS ∼49% -51%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
5253 MIPS ∼100% +13%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
5052 MIPS ∼96% +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2480 - 5811, n=120)
4999 MIPS ∼95% +8%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
4903 MIPS ∼93% +6%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4666 MIPS ∼89% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4664 MIPS ∼89% +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4638 MIPS ∼88%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
486 Points ∼100%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
485 Points ∼100% 0%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
476 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
475 Points ∼98% -2%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
473 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 577, n=167)
461 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
459 Points ∼94% -6%
CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4435 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4380 Points ∼99%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4257 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=168)
3150 Points ∼71% -28%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
3075 Points ∼69% -30%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
2991 Points ∼67% -32%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
2217 Points ∼50% -49%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
8073 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
6906 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=103)
6778 Points ∼84% -16%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
6397 Points ∼79% -21%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
6365 Points ∼79% -21%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
5920 Points ∼73% -27%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
4640 Points ∼57% -43%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
1316 Points ∼100% +9%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
1286 Points ∼98% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1487, n=103)
1249 Points ∼95% +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
1220 Points ∼93% +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1203 Points ∼91%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1188 Points ∼90% -1%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1166 Points ∼89% -3%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
12.9 fps ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
12.1 fps ∼94% -6%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
10.8 fps ∼84% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.7 - 19.8, n=119)
10.7 fps ∼83% -17%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
9.61 fps ∼74% -26%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
9.5 fps ∼74% -26%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.69 fps ∼60% -40%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
69.2 s * ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
60.16 s * ∼87% +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 98.2, n=95)
56 s * ∼81% +19%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
52.6 s * ∼76% +24%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
49 s * ∼71% +29%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
47.2 s * ∼68% +32%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
28.6 s * ∼41% +59%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.634 sec * ∼100% -10%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.607 sec * ∼96% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.507 - 1.088, n=100)
0.604 sec * ∼95% -5%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.603 sec * ∼95% -5%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.602 sec * ∼95% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.583 sec * ∼92% -1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.575 sec * ∼91%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1909 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
102 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
188 Points
Yardım

System performance

The Omen 15 is also a frontrunner when it comes to system performance. 5,766 points in PCMark 10 catapult the 15-incher to the top position.

PCMark 10 - Score
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
5766 Points ∼100%
Aorus 5 KB
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
5452 Points ∼95% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5427 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=332)
5394 Points ∼94% -6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
5193 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
5095 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
4887 Points ∼85% -15%

DPC latencies

In terms of latencies, the notebook also does not have to listen to any criticism. According to the LatencyMon tool, the system is well suited for real-time content and applications.

Latencies
Latencies
Latencies
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
1781 μs * ∼100% -130%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
1767.3 μs * ∼99% -128%
Aorus 5 KB
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
1218.2 μs * ∼68% -57%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
797.4 μs * ∼45% -3%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
775.7 μs * ∼44%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
723.4 μs * ∼41% +7%

* ... smaller is better

Mass storage

Buyers can also look forward to a fast mass storage device. The 512 GB model WDC PC SN730 installed in the review sample achieves more than 2000 MB/s in sequential read and write, which is a very good result. No wonder, since it is a modern PCIe/NVMe drive.

HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
Aorus 5 KB
ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
Average WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
28%
-13%
-0%
10%
-18%
-4%
Write 4K
119.6
233
95%
219.8
84%
117.5
-2%
162.1
36%
145.4
22%
147 (107 - 208, n=13)
23%
Read 4K
47.4
54.5
15%
50.16
6%
47.36
0%
60.66
28%
51.6
9%
46.6 (36.8 - 53.7, n=13)
-2%
Write Seq
2677
3050
14%
978.7
-63%
2748
3%
2366
-12%
1007
-62%
1975 (1025 - 2707, n=13)
-26%
Read Seq
2220
3042
37%
1990
-10%
2084
-6%
2633
19%
1145
-48%
2020 (1356 - 2517, n=13)
-9%
Write 4K Q32T1
427.4
519.5
22%
515.8
21%
407.3
-5%
428.2
0%
468.4
10%
402 (237 - 516, n=13)
-6%
Read 4K Q32T1
549.2
546.1
-1%
298.3
-46%
474.6
-14%
582.2
6%
528.1
-4%
447 (333 - 600, n=13)
-19%
Write Seq Q32T1
2706
3241
20%
981.7
-64%
3069
13%
2480
-8%
1381
-49%
2456 (1087 - 2708, n=13)
-9%
Read Seq Q32T1
2869
3538
23%
1907.2
-34%
3154
10%
3121
9%
2291
-20%
3295 (2869 - 3426, n=13)
15%
AS SSD
15%
-29%
-3%
-17%
-36%
-20%
Score Total
5075
5184
2%
2143
-58%
5205
3%
3279
-35%
2643
-48%
3808 (2834 - 5376, n=13)
-25%
Score Write
2449
2734
12%
1101
-55%
2309
-6%
1714
-30%
1016
-59%
1673 (1173 - 2721, n=13)
-32%
Score Read
1738
1627
-6%
701
-60%
1915
10%
1046
-40%
1096
-37%
1426 (895 - 1787, n=13)
-18%
Access Time Write *
0.022
0.02
9%
0.02
9%
0.036
-64%
0.036
-64%
0.036
-64%
0.0426 (0.022 - 0.076, n=13)
-94%
Access Time Read *
0.138
0.034
75%
0.087
37%
0.06
57%
0.049
64%
0.117
15%
0.0782 (0.05 - 0.138, n=13)
43%
4K-64 Write
2060.9
2297.92
12%
845.47
-59%
1960.96
-5%
1375.73
-33%
780.22
-62%
1341 (938 - 2346, n=13)
-35%
4K-64 Read
1463.06
1282.5
-12%
472.49
-68%
1637.26
12%
713.6
-51%
850.81
-42%
1140 (615 - 1463, n=13)
-22%
4K Write
175.13
190.52
9%
164.78
-6%
103.18
-41%
121.32
-31%
109.31
-38%
145 (96.9 - 212, n=13)
-17%
4K Read
49.5
60.37
22%
60.21
22%
40.61
-18%
53.33
8%
43.66
-12%
44.7 (34.7 - 49.5, n=13)
-10%
Seq Write
2129.44
2452
15%
904
-58%
2446.49
15%
2171.68
2%
1261.05
-41%
1874 (993 - 2479, n=13)
-12%
Seq Read
2255.25
2836
26%
1682
-25%
2368.75
5%
2794.95
24%
2011.91
-11%
2421 (1786 - 2912, n=13)
7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
22% / 20%
-21% / -22%
-2% / -2%
-4% / -6%
-27% / -28%
-12% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2869 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2706 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 549.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 427.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2220 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2677 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 119.6 MB/s

Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720173017401750176017701780179018001810182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020203020402050206020702080209021002110212021302140215021602170218021902200221022202230224022502260227022802290230023102320233023402350236023702380239024002410242024302440245024602470248024902500251025202530254025502560257025802590260026102620263026402650266026702680269027002710272027302740275027602770278027902800281028202830284028502860287028802890Tooltip
: Ø2873 (2626.47-2883.9)

Graphics card

The GeForce RTX 2060 is the perfect companion for gamers who want to invest at most 1,500 Euros (~$1820) in a notebook. The DirectX 12 model is located between the mid- and upper-range in terms of performance and, in contrast to its cheaper brothers, can boast "real" ray-tracing capabilities.

3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (1097 - 6934, n=129)
4275 Points ∼100% +30%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
3531 Points ∼83% +7%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
3445 Points ∼81% +5%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
3286 Points ∼77%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=288)
6205 Points ∼100% +7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6164 Points ∼99% +6%
Aorus 5 KB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6123 Points ∼99% +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6043 Points ∼97% +4%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6012 Points ∼97% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
5848 Points ∼94% 0%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
5819 Points ∼94%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus 5 KB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
16362 Points ∼100% +6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
16355 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
15967 Points ∼98% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
15746 Points ∼96% +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
15609 Points ∼95% +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
15499 Points ∼95%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=673)
12640 Points ∼77% -18%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus 5 KB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
22138 Points ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
21748 Points ∼98% +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
21542 Points ∼97% +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
21480 Points ∼97% +5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
21338 Points ∼96% +4%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
20535 Points ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=742)
15170 Points ∼69% -26%

While the CPU power is - as already explained - above average, the GPU speed falls behind the competition a bit. The Omen 15-en0375ng brings up the rear in the 3DMark tests, but the difference is often marginal and subjectively hardly noticeable. The same applies to the subtle frame rate drop in the Witcher 3 test (about 1 hour @FHD/Ultra), which simulates a longer 3D load.

0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
HP Omen 15-en0375ng GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G: Ø57.4 (51-62)
3DMark 11 Performance
18798 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38655 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14526 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score
6161 puan
Yardım

Gaming performance

The combination of Ryzen 7 4800H and GeForce RTX 2060 is fast enough to play most current games smoothly with 1,920 x 1,080 pixels and maximum details. Only very demanding and/or poorly optimized games, such as Watch Dogs Legion, Dirt 5 and Cyberpunk 2077, drop the Avg FPS below the 40 mark.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H
68.3 fps ∼100% +21%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
60.5 (51min - 68max) fps ∼89% +7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H
59.1 (49min) fps ∼87% +5%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
58.8 (48min) fps ∼86% +4%
Aorus 5 KB
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H
57 (47min) fps ∼83% +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
56.4 fps ∼83%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=442)
55.5 fps ∼81% -2%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H
124.8 fps ∼100% +17%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
107 fps ∼86%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
105 (90min - 115max) fps ∼84% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
105 fps ∼84% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 223, n=374)
97.6 fps ∼78% -9%
düşük orta yüksek ultra
GTA V (2015) 165 159 127 70.8 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 107 56.4 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 123 115 109 104 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 91.5 81.9 68.8 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 83 73 fps
Battlefield V (2018) 102 93.1 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 61.9 48.1 fps
Valorant (2020) 177 fps
Crysis Remastered (2020) 52.9 40 fps
FIFA 21 (2020) 163 161 fps
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 66 36 fps
Dirt 5 (2020) 59.2 38.7 fps
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 53 46 fps
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War (2020) 62.2 57.1 fps
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) 71.8 64.1 fps
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020) 54 51 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 (2020) 45.3 38.8 fps

Emissions

Noise emissions

The fan control leaves a decent impression when idling and during simple activities (office, web, etc.). Although there can be short upsurges every now and then, the fans usually stand still, which leads to silent operation. Under load, however, the 15-incher clearly attracts attention. 48 dB(A) in the Witcher 3 test is similar to the noise level of the competition, which reaches 47 to 51 dB(A).

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.341.235.93839.52534.836.933.335.9383146.244.143.143.245.64030.832.527.628.630.65034.743.623.624.8386332.336.131.925.438.68030.83728.219.436.310026.530.420.218.330.412530.129.918.817.936.316030.827.417.917.634.62003125.421.522.13125031.526.317.417.435.331531.227.21313.934.940030.623.811.111.333.750031.624.410.510.535.463034.325.510.51038.480033.225.210.310.139.6100033.62610.310.439.6125034.926.710.710.640.6160034.927.511.110.940.920003530.611.211.240.4250039.124.711.611.841.5315031.519.812.312.340.9400027.817.412.612.336500023.814.612.712.632.5630021.11412.712.629.9800018.713.112.912.726.61000017.212.812.812.822.31250016.112.512.512.418.61600015.911.711.711.714.7SPL45.336.924.424.250.6N4.62.40.60.67.2median 31median 25.2median 12.5median 12.3median 35.3Delta4.65.21.91.84.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Omen 15-en0375ng

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta
24 / 25 / 37 dB
Çalışırken
45 / 51 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
sessiz
40 dB(A)
duyulabilirlik
50 dB(A)
gürültülü
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm uzaklık)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Aorus 5 KB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-2%
-6%
-2%
-8%
-6%
-10%
off / environment *
24
25
-4%
30.2
-26%
25
-4%
25
-4%
30.7
-28%
28.8 (24 - 32, n=431)
-20%
Idle Minimum *
24
26
-8%
30.2
-26%
25
-4%
26
-8%
30.7
-28%
31.2 (24 - 42, n=854)
-30%
Idle Average *
25
30
-20%
30.2
-21%
29
-16%
30
-20%
30.7
-23%
32.4 (24.4 - 46.6, n=854)
-30%
Idle Maximum *
37
32
14%
30.2
18%
34
8%
34
8%
30.7
17%
34.6 (24.4 - 57, n=854)
6%
Load Average *
45
46
-2%
40
11%
44
2%
53
-18%
36.6
19%
41.4 (28 - 59, n=855)
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
48
-0%
49
-2%
49
-2%
51
-6%
47
2%
Load Maximum *
51
48
6%
49
4%
49
4%
56
-10%
50.9
-0%
48.7 (38.9 - 66.6, n=855)
5%

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

The temperature development of the chassis varies a lot. While the case's bottom heats up to over 50 °C (122 °F) in some places under full load, the top only reaches a maximum of 42 °C (107.6 °F) - a moderate rate. Under the hood, the processor in particular heats up. After 60 minutes of stress testing with the Furmark and Prime95 tools, the Ryzen 7 4800H made itself comfortable at around 86 °C (186.8 °F). The GeForce RTX 2060 stayed noticeably cooler with just under 70 °C (158 °F). The values in the Witcher 3 test can be seen in the first screenshot.

The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
Stress test
Stress test
Full load top
Full load top
Full load below
Full load below
Maksimum yük
 39 °C41 °C42 °C 
 38 °C42 °C39 °C 
 30 °C32 °C33 °C 
Maksimum: 42 °C
Ortalama: 37.3 °C
53 °C54 °C50 °C
48 °C48 °C33 °C
32 °C29 °C28 °C
Maksimum: 54 °C
Ortalama: 41.7 °C
Güç kaynağı  55 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.9 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 42.7 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.2 °C / -11.2 F).
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Aorus 5 KB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-14%
4%
-21%
-11%
2%
-6%
Maximum Upper Side *
42
51
-21%
42.9
-2%
55
-31%
50
-19%
46.3
-10%
46 (28 - 68.8, n=820)
-10%
Maximum Bottom *
54
64
-19%
49.9
8%
65
-20%
49
9%
44.4
18%
49.9 (25.9 - 78, n=818)
8%
Idle Upper Side *
28
29
-4%
27.8
1%
32
-14%
35
-25%
28.1
-0%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=771)
-10%
Idle Bottom *
29
32
-10%
27
7%
34
-17%
31
-7%
29.4
-1%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=769)
-10%

* ... smaller is better

Loudspeaker

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203840.12535.938.53143.243.24028.629.85024.826.66325.428.38019.425.410018.320.612517.931.916017.643.820022.15225017.462.531513.965.240011.366.850010.570.16301069.280010.166.1100010.469.9125010.670.8160010.968.4200011.265.6250011.867.2315012.370.2400012.372.1500012.672.6630012.670.9800012.760.81000012.867.41250012.470.51600011.773.2SPL24.281.6N0.654.5median 12.3median 67.4Delta1.87.138.43935.536.644.347.829.934.241.839.126.830.32426.316.61915.928.721.141.618.949.715.756.813.959.41262.511.566.211.270.811.270.51168.711.166.711.466.811.467.711.568.712.969.313.164.414.360.814.475.413.582.212.879.712.379.511.863.72585.50.658.4median 12.8median 66.71.56.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 15-en0375ngSchenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 15-en0375ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power management

Energy absorption

For a gaming notebook, the power consumption is within limits. The Omen 15-en0375ng is relatively frugal with 4 to 22 watts in idle mode, which promises good battery runtimes. Even under load, the consumption rates are usually better than those of the competition. There are many indications that the Ryzen 7 4800H is more energy-efficient than its Intel counterparts - thanks to the modern manufacturing process (7 vs 14 nm).

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.1 / 0.1 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 4 / 9 / 22 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 102 / 182 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Aorus 5 KB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-43%
-5%
-4%
-31%
12%
-113%
Idle Minimum *
4
12
-200%
5.4
-35%
4
-0%
8
-100%
3.2
20%
18.6 (1.9 - 113, n=814)
-365%
Idle Average *
9
14
-56%
10
-11%
10
-11%
12
-33%
8.3
8%
24 (6 - 119, n=814)
-167%
Idle Maximum *
22
20
9%
10.5
52%
19
14%
21
5%
8.7
60%
29.7 (8.3 - 122, n=814)
-35%
Load Average *
102
103
-1%
135
-32%
96
6%
128
-25%
82
20%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=806)
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
119
125
-5%
144
-21%
136
-14%
138
-16%
151
-27%
Load Maximum *
182
193
-6%
147
19%
214
-18%
217
-19%
195
-7%
178 (21.9 - 590, n=805)
2%

* ... smaller is better

Battery life

One of the biggest strengths of the Omen 15-en0375ng is its battery life. Up to 20 hours in the ideal case (minimum load & display brightness) and about 10.5 hours of Internet surfing via WLAN (brightness reduced to about 150 d/m²) are outstanding in the gaming segment. Only Lenovo's Legion 5 can come close to these rates. However, the performance also drops significantly in battery mode. The frame rate dropped by almost 90(!)% in the Witcher 3 test without a power supply. However, performance or not: 70.9 Wh battery capacity should be a model for the competition (48 to 62 Wh).

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
20h 00min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 28min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
1h 48min
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 70.9 Wh
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 62 Wh
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 58.7 Wh
Aorus 5 KB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48.96 Wh
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-41%
-28%
-38%
-52%
-27%
-50%
Reader / Idle
1200
469
-61%
587
-51%
575
-52%
538
-55%
848
-29%
370 (39 - 1399, n=753)
-69%
WiFi v1.3
628
354
-44%
370
-41%
329
-48%
285
-55%
433
-31%
275 (62 - 683, n=481)
-56%
Load
108
87
-19%
116
7%
92
-15%
58
-46%
84
-22%
80.2 (18 - 243, n=723)
-26%
H.264
371
322
554
283 (88 - 860, n=179)

Artılar

+ iyi fiyat-performans oranı
+ pratik komuta merkezi
+ dengeli donanım
+ mükemmel pil ömrü
+ şık tasarım

Eksiler

- alışması biraz zaman alan klavye düzeni
- geçerli USB bağlantı noktası yok
- yüksek gürültü gelişimi
- Zayıf yönleri olan ekran
- dengesiz kapak
- yetersiz WLAN

Conclusion

HP Omen 15-en0375ng: Test device provided by HP Germany
HP Omen 15-en0375ng: Test device provided by HP Germany

If you can put up with a color-poor 60 Hz display and a high noise level in 3D mode, the Omen 15-en0375ng is a powerful and not too expensive gaming notebook.

We consider around 1,260 Euros (~$1530) for a Ryzen 7 4800H, a GeForce RTX 2060, a 512 GB SSD and 16 GB dual-channel RAM to be a good offer that appeals to price-conscious gamers. Very high details are rarely a problem in the native resolution of 1,920 x 1,080. Buyers will also be spoiled with a top-notch battery life that even beats most other notebook classes.

If HP now improves the speed of the WLAN module, the stability of the case and the repeatedly criticized picture quality, the competition will have to dress extra warmly.

Note: Other AMD models of the Omen 15 offer a (probably better) 144 Hz panel.

Availability

The tested model with the suffix en0375ng is only listed by very few online stores (e.g. Mediamarkt & Saturn) and is unfortunately not available there at the moment.

HP Omen 15-en0375ng - 12/29/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

İşcilik
74 / 98 → 75%
Klavye
83%
Mouse
75%
Bağlanılabilirlik
60 / 80 → 75%
Ağırlık
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Batarya
88 / 95 → 93%
Görüntü
82%
Oyun performansı
90%
Uygulama performansı
93%
Isınma
84 / 95 → 89%
Ses
75 / 90 → 83%
Audio
77%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Ortalama
76%
83%
Gaming - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > HP Omen 15 dizüstü bilgisayar incelemesi: Güçlü AMD işlemci Intel'i titretiyor
Florian Glaser, 2021-02- 6 (Update: 2021-02- 6)
Aslinur Sarica
Translator: Aslinur Sarica - Translator