Notebookcheck

HP Omen 15 (i5-8300H, GTX 1050 Ti, FHD) Laptop

Florian Glaser, 07/29/2018

Fiyat performans kahramanı. HP'nin Omen serisi uygun fiyatlı dizüstü bilgisayarları uzun yıllardır piyasada. Şu anki 15 inçlik Coffee Lake oyun dizüstü bilgisayarına daha yakından baktık - bütçe oyun dizüstü bilgisayarımızın ilk 10 listesine girmek için yeterince iyi mi?

HP Omen 15

While the 2017 edition was still based on Intel’s Kaby Lake CPUs HP’s latest 15-inch Omen notebook is designed around the brand-new Coffee Lake platform with four or six cores. Depending on the SKU you either get a Core i5-8300H or a Core i7-8750H.

It is accompanied by between 8 and 32 GB of DDR4 RAM, a 128 to 512 GB SSD, and a 1 TB large hard disk drive. All things graphics-related are relegated to a recent DirectX 12 chip made by Nvidia - either the mid-range GeForce GTX 1050 Ti or the more powerful GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q or GTX 1070 Max-Q. The display is always an FHD IPS panel (1920x1080).

Our review unit was the base model equipped with a Core i5-8300H, a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, 8 GB of RAM, and a storage space combination consisting of a 128 GB SSD and a 1 TB HDD. Prices in Europe for this particular base model start at 999 Euros including tax (~$1164). US customers get a slightly different model equipped with 12 instead of 8 GB of RAM, and prices on this side of the Atlantic start at around $920 plus tax.

Its biggest competitors are other budget notebooks from our gaming notebooks top 10 list, including the Xiaomi Mi Gaming and Dell G5 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Max-Q)), the Acer Aspire 7 A715 and Asus GL503VD (GeForce GTX 1050), and the Medion Erazer X6603 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti).

HP Omen 15-dc0001ng (Omen Seri)
İşlemci
Intel Core i5-8300H
Grafik kartı
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) - 4096 MB, Çekirdek: 1493 MHz, Bellek: 7000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 389.12, Optimus
Bellek
8192 MB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, single channel, 1 of 2 slots used, max. 32 GB
Görüntü
15.6 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE07A1, IPS, FHD, 60 Hz, parlak: hayır
Anakart
Intel HM370
Harddisk
Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G, 128 GB 
, PCIe-SSD + Seagate BarraCuda Pro ST1000LM049, 1 TB HDD, 7200 rpm. slots: 1x M.2-2280 & 1x 2.5 inch
Ses kartı
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Bağlantılar
4 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: 1x headphones, 1x microphone, Kart okuyucular: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Network
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 25 x 360 x 263
Batarya
70 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4-cell
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: 2.0 Bang & Olufsen, Klavye: Chiclet, RGB, Klavye ışığı: evet, 150 W power supply, quick-start guide, various HP tools, McAfee LifeSafe trial, 24 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
2.42 kg, Güç kaynağı: 343 g
Fiyat
1000 EUR
Bağlantılar

 

Case

Despite the many similarities with its predecessor the case has been redesigned quite a bit. Most importantly, the display bezels have been reduced significantly and the overall footprint has been reduced to just 36 x 26.3 x 27.6 cm (14 x 10.4 x 10.9 inches). Many of the available ports have been relocated to the rear of the device, and instead of a continuous hinge the new model features two distinct separate hinges (probably because of the connectivity situation).

What impressed us most was the revised keyboard. Not only did HP remove the hard to read red lettering and replace it with conventional white letters instead, the engineers and designers also updated the formerly uniformly red backlight to several individually adjustable and configurable zones and changed the layout somewhat. More on that later.

HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15

Optics and haptics remained largely unchanged. The top case is made of brushed aluminum; the bottom and the display lid are made of textured plastic. Due to the many shape transitions and the ornamental use of colors the design is very distinct without being overly playful.

The overall build quality and structural rigidity matched the device’s price. While the lid was somewhat flexible - a problem found on many notebooks - the rest of the case was very sturdy and, at no more than 2.5 cm (1 inch), also fairly slim. Combined with its moderate weight of just 2.4 kg (5.3 lbs) it was even somewhat portable. Its competitors were all between 2.2 and 2.9 kg (4.9 - 6.4 lbs).

Size Comparison

Bağlantı

Portlar

Solaklar port dağıtımı konusunda sevinecekler. HP, birkaç bağlantı noktasını dizüstü bilgisayarın arka ucuna yerleştirmeye karar verdi, bu da her iki tarafın da dış farelere göre önemli ölçüde dirsek odağı kazandığını gösteriyor. Ne yazık ki, bazı gereksiz takaslar var, en önemlisi hala önceki modelde bulunan Thunderbolt 3'ün yokluğu. Bunun yerine, yeni modelin tek USB-C portu, büyük bir düşüş olan USB 3.1 Gen1'den fazlasını desteklemiyor. Ancak, Thunderbolt 3'ün henüz mevcut olmayan daha pahalı ve daha güçlü SKU'lara geri dönmesi hedefleniyor.

Limanların geri kalanı değişmedi. 15 inçlik dizüstü bilgisayar hala bir SD kart okuyucusu, üç adet USB 3.0 Tip-A bağlantı noktası, bir katlama RJ45 Ethernet bağlantı noktası, iki ses bağlantı noktası (ses çıkışı, mikrofon girişi), HDMI, DisplayPort ve son olarak değil En az bir Kensington kilidi.

Rear: RF45 Ethernet, USB-A 3.1 Gen1, HDMI, Mini-DisplayPort, USB-C 3.1 Gen1, Kensington lock
Rear: RF45 Ethernet, USB-A 3.1 Gen1, HDMI, Mini-DisplayPort, USB-C 3.1 Gen1, Kensington lock
Left: USB-A 3.1 Gen1, headphones, microphone, card reader
Left: USB-A 3.1 Gen1, headphones, microphone, card reader
Right: USB-A 3.1 Gen1, power
Right: USB-A 3.1 Gen1, power

SD Card Reader

At 78-87 MB/s the card reader’s performance was similar to the previous model. In the global scheme of things it was mediocre at best, although we must add that not a single one of our competitors was capable of maxing out our 260 MB/s reference card. At the low end of the spectrum the Dell G5’s and the Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop’s card readers managed no more than USB 2.0 speeds.

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼100%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
73.5 MB/s ∼94% -6%
Medion Erazer X6603
  (oshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72 MB/s ∼92% -8%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
 
70.67 MB/s ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s ∼35% -65%
Dell G5 15 5587
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
20 MB/s ∼26% -74%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus GL503VD-DB74
 
87.37 MB/s ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84.4 MB/s ∼97% -3%
Medion Erazer X6603
  (oshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.2 MB/s ∼90% -10%
Dell G5 15 5587
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
35 MB/s ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28 MB/s ∼32% -68%

Communication

As expected of a modern notebook the Omen 15 comes with an up-to-date wireless modem: Intel’s Wireless-AC 9560. When connected to our Linksys EA8500 reference router it managed more than 600 Mbps in both transmit and receive (1 m distance between the two devices). The predecessor’s Intel Wireless-AC 7265 was significantly slower when transmitting data.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
701 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
659 MBit/s ∼94% -4%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
637 MBit/s ∼91% -8%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
635 MBit/s ∼91% -8%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
517 MBit/s ∼74% -25%
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
485 MBit/s ∼69% -30%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
664 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
643 MBit/s ∼97%
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
582 MBit/s ∼88% -9%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
512 MBit/s ∼77% -20%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
426 MBit/s ∼64% -34%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
420 MBit/s ∼63% -35%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
363 MBit/s ∼55% -44%

Software

Nowadays, almost every gaming notebook comes with its own tuning and monitoring software, and the HP Omen 15 is no exception. The preinstalled software called Command Center shows CPU, GPU, and RAM load and temperatures as well as network traffic. It can be used to configure the keyboard backlight but lacks any form of overclocking capabilities.

Command Center
Command Center
Command Center
Command Center

Accessories

The only items we found in the box in addition to the notebook itself were a quick-start guide and the surprisingly compact (14 x 6.5 x 2 cm / 5.5 x 2.6 x 0.8 inches) and lightweight 150 W power supply.

Maintenance

Unfortunately, we were unable to assess the Omen 15’s maintainability. Even after removing every single Phillips screw at the bottom the cover was still firmly affixed to the case. Accordingly, we feared that we would damage the notebook if we continued trying to pry it open and eventually gave up. After all, we did not want to damage our shop unit provided by cyperport.de. That being said, we expect the internals to be largely identical to the predecessor. Please refer to the previous review for details and photos.

Warranty

As usual, US customers are deprived of the second year of warranty that European customers must have grown accustomed to at this point.

Input Devices

Keyboard

The keyboard turned out to be very decent. In addition to the single-stage multi-color backlight we were particularly fond of the new color for the labels, which had a massive impact on legibility. Typing was decent and will probably satisfy most users. Don’t expect top-class performance regarding accentuation point or feedback, though.

Despite the overall fairly narrow case HP has managed to fit a numpad next to the regular-sized chiclet-style keyboard. However, the layout was a bit of a challenge as it deviated significantly from the default German keyboard layout. Take a look at for example the single-row Return key, the relocated ><| key, or the missing right CTRL key. Basically, HP took the regular US QWERTY layout and simply remapped some keys instead of adjusting the layout accordingly. US customers will find a regular QWERTY keyboard layout with teeny-tiny cursor keys that are almost impossible to use for gaming.

Chiclet keyboard...
Chiclet keyboard...
...with several backlight zones.
...with several backlight zones.

Touchpad

The silver-framed and slightly recessed touchpad was inconspicuous by and large. In other words: It was neither particularly good nor particularly bad. That not only applied to precision but also to smoothness. Gestures generally worked very well, although we noticed a minor input lag when performing them.

At 10.2 x 5.7 cm (4 x 2.2 inches) the touchpad was adequately sized for a 15-inch notebook. Unlike many other manufacturers HP has opted against a ClickPad and for two dedicated mouse buttons below the touch surface, which improved overall precision noticeably.

Display

Our review unit’s FHD display left us with mixed feelings. On the bright side its contrast ratio was very decent (1,019:1) thanks to its low black level of just 0.27 nits.

253
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
250
cd/m²
249
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 275 cd/m² Ortalama: 254 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 90 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 275 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1019:1 (Siyah: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.62 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 3.59
ΔE Greyscale 4.31 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
59% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
BOE07A1, IPS, 1920x1080
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
AUO42ED, IPS, 1920x1080
Dell G5 15 5587
LGD053F, 156WF6, IPS, 1920x1080
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE0747), IPS, 1920x1080
Medion Erazer X6603
LP156WF6-SPK3, AH-IPS, LED, 1920x1080
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
BOE NV156FHM-N42 , a-Si TFT-LCD, IPS, 1920x1080
Asus GL503VD-DB74
LG Philips LP156WF6, IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
6%
28%
3545%
333%
3295%
3482%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47.2 (23.6, 23.6)
43.2 (21.2, 22)
8%
33 (16, 17)
30%
53.2 (26.4, 26.8)
-13%
46 (36, 10)
3%
49 (25, 24)
-4%
36.4 (16.4, 20)
23%
Response Time Black / White *
32.4 (18, 14.4)
31.2 (16.4, 14.8)
4%
24 (14, 10)
26%
41.6 (23.6, 18)
-28%
29 (17, 12)
10%
36 (20, 16)
-11%
26.2 (14, 12.4)
19%
PWM Frequency
200 (99)
21550 (99)
10675%
2174 (90)
987%
20000 (90)
9900%
21010 (99)
10405%
Screen
22%
-23%
15%
-23%
-1%
5%
Brightness middle
275
304
11%
229
-17%
283
3%
252
-8%
267
-3%
315.9
15%
Brightness
254
289
14%
224
-12%
269
6%
246
-3%
250
-2%
304
20%
Brightness Distribution
90
86
-4%
87
-3%
87
-3%
94
4%
82
-9%
88
-2%
Black Level *
0.27
0.26
4%
0.28
-4%
0.23
15%
0.23
15%
0.31
-15%
0.37
-37%
Contrast
1019
1169
15%
818
-20%
1230
21%
1096
8%
861
-16%
854
-16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.62
3.46
25%
6.1
-32%
4.68
-1%
7.83
-69%
4.65
-1%
4.9
-6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.05
7.72
4%
12.2
-52%
8
1%
15.5
-93%
8.2
-2%
9.7
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.59
6.12
-70%
2.5
30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.31
2.46
43%
5.68
-32%
4.32
-0%
7.11
-65%
2.65
39%
3.8
12%
Gamma
2.49 96%
2.38 101%
2.4 100%
2.36 102%
2.19 110%
2.44 98%
2.24 107%
CCT
7000 93%
6915 94%
6989 93%
7612 85%
7930 82%
6820 95%
6847 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38
59
55%
36
-5%
57
50%
35
-8%
38
0%
55
45%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59
91
54%
57
-3%
87
47%
55
-7%
59
0%
84
42%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
14% / 19%
3% / -15%
1780% / 772%
155% / 60%
1647% / 760%
1744% / 808%

* ... smaller is better

Nevertheless, the display seemed very dull and pale, and we quickly found the culprit: Its color-space coverage was abysmal. 59% sRGB and 38% AdobeRGB are very poor results even for a gaming notebook. That being said, we should add that the Dell G5, the Medion Erazer X6603, and the Acer Aspire 7 did not do particularly well in this regard either. The notable exceptions were the Asus GL503VD and the Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop.

CalMAN: grayscale
CalMAN: grayscale
CalMAN: saturation
CalMAN: saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

Response times were also too high. 32 ms black-to-white and 47 ms gray-to-gray are quite poor for a gaming device. The Gigabyte Aero 15X, the Razer Blade 15, the MSI GS65, and the Schenker XMG Neo 15 have much faster IPS panels.

HP Omen 15 vs. sRGB (59%)
HP Omen 15 vs. sRGB (59%)
Subpixel geometry
Subpixel geometry
HP Omen 15 vs. AdobeRGB (38%)
HP Omen 15 vs. AdobeRGB (38%)

Last but not least let’s address the elephant in the room: display brightness. At just 254 nits on average the Omen 15’s display was too dark even for indoor usage and rendered completely useless outdoors by even the tiniest amount of sunshine. At least the 60 Hz panel featured decent viewing angles with just minor and mostly unnoticeable halations in the corners that were only visible in situations with dark and/or unicolored backgrounds.

Outdoors
Outdoors
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 14.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.6 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8895 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Performance

Based on our review unit’s hardware - Core i5-8300H CPU, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GPU, 8 GB single-channel RAM - the Omen 15 would be considered an upper mid-range device. The CPU and GPU are soldered onto the motherboard but the RAM can be upgraded up to 32 GB (2x 16 GB). In theory, upgrading the storage devices (1x M.2, 1x 2.5-inch) is also possible.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
LatencyMon
Software

Processor

Given the immense cooling requirements and the fact that most games are GPU instead of CPU bound it makes perfect sense that HP opted for the quad-core Core i5-8300H CPU instead of the hexa-core Core i5-8750H in the low-end SKU. After all, it is still more than powerful enough for everyday applications.

Single-core rendering
Single-core rendering
Multi-core rendering
Multi-core rendering
GPU load
GPU load

The Coffee Lake CPU has access to 8 MB of cache and can turbo-boost up to 4 GHz. In reality, the maximum turbo boost measured by us was 3.9 GHz during the first few seconds of our 30-minute long Cinebench R15 loop, after which it dropped to around 3.3 GHz.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.68 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.94 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
805 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
173 Points
Yardım

By and large, the scores remained fairly consistent. Laptops equipped with the more powerful yet also more demanding Core i7-8750H often have trouble keeping performance at a consistent level. Compared with the Core i7-7700HQ the new CPU was just 10% faster but was a whopping 50% faster when compared with its direct predecessor, the Core i5-7300HQ (which still lacked support for Hyper-Threading).

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points ∼100%
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Core i5-8300H
172 Points ∼99% -1%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼92% -8%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼87% -13%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
147 Points ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
138 Points ∼80% -20%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
133 Points ∼77% -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
805 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
740 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points ∼91% -9%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points ∼91% -9%
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Core i5-8300H
731 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
516 Points ∼64% -36%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
513 Points ∼64% -36%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.94 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.94 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points ∼93% -7%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.72 Points ∼89% -11%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.68 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.56 Points ∼80% -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
8.68 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.17 Points ∼94% -6%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.13 Points ∼94% -6%
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Core i5-8300H
7.84 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.93 Points ∼68% -32%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.91 Points ∼68% -32%

System Performance

Thanks to our base model’s SSD the PCMark scores were at an acceptable level and good enough for overall third place in PCMark 10. The operating system booted very quickly and felt very snappy during everyday use.

PCMark 10 - Score
Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8300H, SK hynix SC311 M.2
5483 Points ∼100% +16%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4861 Points ∼89% +3%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
4707 Points ∼86%
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4618 Points ∼84% -2%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, ADATA SX7000NP 256 GB
4250 Points ∼78% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
4197 Points ∼77% -11%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
4092 Points ∼75% -13%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
5362 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5348 Points ∼100% 0%
Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8300H, SK hynix SC311 M.2
5339 Points ∼100% 0%
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5129 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, ADATA SX7000NP 256 GB
4973 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
4912 Points ∼92% -8%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
4908 Points ∼92% -8%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4858 Points ∼100% +18%
Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8300H, SK hynix SC311 M.2
4331 Points ∼89% +5%
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4119 Points ∼85% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
4109 Points ∼85%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
4055 Points ∼83% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
3910 Points ∼80% -5%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, ADATA SX7000NP 256 GB
3852 Points ∼79% -6%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4109 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5362 puan
Yardım

Storage Devices

The Omen 15’s storage devices failed to meet our expectations. The 128 GB Toshiba M.2 PCIe SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) offered a very fast read performance on a par with its competitors but an incredibly poor write performance akin to a spinning disk drive. This poor write performance became very noticeable during everyday use, for example when installing software or Windows updates or when transferring data onto the drive. In AS SSD, 80% of its competitors were faster than the Omen 15.

SSD
SSD
SSD
SSD
HDD
HDD
HDD
HDD

A secondary Seagate Barracuda Pro ST1000LM049 was installed in our review unit’s 2.5-inch slot. This particular model offered 1 TB capacity and operated at 7,200 rpm.

HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
Dell G5 15 5587
SK hynix SC311 M.2
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
Medion Erazer X6603
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
Asus GL503VD-DB74
ADATA SX7000NP 256 GB
AS SSD
-7%
48%
257%
51%
155%
Score Total
670
557
-17%
834
24%
2431
263%
1099
64%
1476
120%
Score Write
195
199
2%
302
55%
750
285%
395
103%
851
336%
Score Read
343
240
-30%
343
0%
1162
239%
460
34%
419
22%
4K Write
79.31
62.19
-22%
104.05
31%
129.25
63%
64.73
-18%
110.68
40%
4K Read
31.48
24.44
-22%
38.11
21%
46.58
48%
36.25
15%
31.4
0%
Seq Write
123.53
243.71
97%
450.12
264%
1080.63
775%
394.18
219%
825.04
568%
Seq Read
1237.74
511.34
-59%
501.5
-59%
2805.35
127%
488.37
-61%
1226.49
-1%
Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1096 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 130.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 195.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 104.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 856.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 130.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 29.51 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 77.11 MB/s

GPU Performance

If you’re on a budget and willing to make sacrifices in regard to in-game details then the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the perfect card. The Pascal chip supports DirectX 12 and has access to 4 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. In other words: It is a perfect compromise between price and performance.

3DMark 11 Performance
8908 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22454 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6653 puan
Yardım

Just like the CPU, the GPU was also capable of utilizing its turbo potential fairly well. In 3D applications it often ran much faster than its base clock speed of 1,493 MHz: For example a nigh perfect 1,709 MHz during our 60-minute The Witcher 3 loop (FHD/Ultra). The maximum was measured at 1,759 MHz according to GPU-Z’s render test.

0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra

Our benchmarks were completed very similar to the Medion Erazer X6603 that was equipped with the exact same GPU. The Omen 15 was around 20-30% faster than its GeForce GTX 1050 competitors and approximately 30-40% slower than a GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q device. In 3DMark 13’s Fire Strike a GeForce GTX 1060 performed up to 50% faster.

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11903 Points ∼100% +57%
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
10970 Points ∼92% +45%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
10349 Points ∼87% +37%
Medion Erazer X6603
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7694 Points ∼65% +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7576 Points ∼64%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
6164 Points ∼52% -19%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
5952 Points ∼50% -21%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15322 Points ∼100% +65%
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
13871 Points ∼91% +50%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
13279 Points ∼87% +43%
Medion Erazer X6603
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9518 Points ∼62% +3%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9266 Points ∼60%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
7917 Points ∼52% -15%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
7471 Points ∼49% -19%

Gaming Performance

As long as you restrict yourself to the Omen 15’s panel’s native FHD resolution of 1920x1080 and don’t try gaming on external WQHD or 4K displays most games will run very smoothly in high or maximum details. Only very demanding titles, such as The Witcher 3, might be somewhat problematic.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
40.3 fps ∼100% +67%
Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8300H
34.9 (min: 29, max: 39) fps ∼87% +44%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
34.6 fps ∼86% +43%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
24.2 fps ∼60%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
22 fps ∼55% -9%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
72.8 fps ∼100% +65%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
63.2 fps ∼87% +43%
Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8300H
58.3 fps ∼80% +32%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
44.2 fps ∼61%

For reasons of pricing and in order to keep power consumption low the entry-level SKU lacks features such as G-Sync or 120/144 Hz displays. In return, our review unit supported Optimus-switching graphics, which means it dynamically switched between the internal UHD Graphics 630 and the external GeForce GPU on demand.

düşük orta yüksek ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 44.224.2fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 88.366.6fps
Overwatch (2016) 11771fps
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 47.543.3fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 153114fps
Destiny 2 (2017) 62.851.2fps

Emissions

System Noise

One of the biggest challenges of the Omen 15’s slim design is proper cooling. Like almost all gaming notebooks our review unit got very loud under load, and at 47 dB(A) while running The Witcher 3 it was quieter than the Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop (50 dB(A)) but noticeably louder than the Dell G5 and its Max-Q GPU at just 43 dB(A).

System noise idle
System noise idle
System noise load
System noise load
Speaker
Speaker

The cooling solution was much better when idle, although the fans did rev up occasionally even then. Most of the time, however, they were either spinning very slowly or turned off completely. In these situations the only sound we could hear was the spinning hard disk drive.

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta
29 / 33 / 41 dB
HDD
33 dB
Çalışırken
44 / 49 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
sessiz
40 dB(A)
duyulabilirlik
50 dB(A)
gürültülü
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm uzaklık)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8300H
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ
Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
Noise
3%
7%
-3%
7%
10%
4%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
30.3
-4%
30
-3%
30.9
-7%
30.4
-5%
28.3
2%
Idle Minimum *
29
30
-3%
31.1
-7%
30
-3%
30.9
-7%
30.4
-5%
30.6
-6%
Idle Average *
33
33
-0%
31.1
6%
34
-3%
30.9
6%
30.8
7%
30.8
7%
Idle Maximum *
41
37
10%
34.2
17%
38
7%
31.6
23%
30.8
25%
32.8
20%
Load Average *
44
41
7%
34.9
21%
44
-0%
38.5
12%
33.6
24%
37.6
15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
47
42
11%
42.7
9%
50
-6%
47
-0%
Load Maximum *
49
50
-2%
44
10%
55
-12%
40.8
17%
43.4
11%
53.5
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

Surface temperatures remained almost identical to the previous model. When idle, the case reached a maximum of 28-35 °C (83 - 95 °F) due to the turned-off fans. Under 3D load the rear third of the case was the hottest part of the device and reached top and bottom maximums of 51 °C (124 F) and 58 °C (136 °F), respectively. Luckily the palm rests remained comparatively cool at just 42 °C (108 °F). The Dell G5 was very similar under 3D load while the Medion Erazer X6603 and the Acer Aspire 7 remained noticeably cooler.

The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
Stress test
Stress test
Full load top (Optris PI 640)
Full load top (Optris PI 640)
Full load bottom (Optris PI 640)
Full load bottom (Optris PI 640)

As always, we ran our usual stress test of at least one full hour of Prime95 and FurMark simultaneously. After one hour, the GPU had reached a maximum of 83 °C (182 °F) - a more than acceptable temperature that was achieved by throttling the GPU. The Core i5-8300H, on the other hand, recorded a very high maximum of 99 °C (210 °F) while running at a turbo boost clock speed of 3.3 GHz. Nevertheless, the cooling solution seemed to have reached its limits with the quad-core already and we strongly suspect that the i7-8750H will be too much for the Omen 15’s coolers and fans.

Maksimum yük
 49 °C50 °C48 °C 
 48 °C51 °C48 °C 
 39 °C42 °C40 °C 
Maksimum: 51 °C
Ortalama: 46.1 °C
57 °C53 °C58 °C
56 °C55 °C50 °C
36 °C38 °C30 °C
Maksimum: 58 °C
Ortalama: 48.1 °C
Güç kaynağı  54 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8300H
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ
Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
Heat
-1%
10%
10%
26%
19%
-2%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
47
8%
50.2
2%
46
10%
44.3
13%
41.6
18%
60.4
-18%
Maximum Bottom *
58
54
7%
57
2%
52
10%
39.5
32%
42.5
27%
55.2
5%
Idle Upper Side *
35
36
-3%
28.6
18%
32
9%
24.8
29%
29.7
15%
32.4
7%
Idle Bottom *
35
40
-14%
28.9
17%
32
9%
24.6
30%
29.4
16%
36
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Speakers

Even though on paper our review unit’s sound performance was slightly worse than its predecessor’s we would still consider the 2.0 system to be acceptable and decent. As is almost always the case with notebook speakers they lack volume, dynamic range, and precision. Accordingly, we would still suggest using a headset or external speakers for an improved audio experience. As an interim solution the internal speakers will do, however.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.541.92532.633.4313030.24029.5355026.427.66324.526.48024.226.410024.231.312523.937.41602137.920021.351.525020.862.331519.567.540018.569.850018.271.963017.775.98001872.8100017.873.112501772160017.174.6200017.471250017.569.2315017.567.9400017.468.5500017.369.1630017.464.3800017.562.51000017.467.31250019.272.91600018.765.9SPL29.883N1.358.2median 17.8HP Omen 15-dc0001ngmedian 68.5Delta1.673734.931.629.128.726.529.330.827.226.225.32625.32625.436.422.54923.547.522.457.319.963.620.566.218.868.618.266.818.369.617.67117.770.717.171.116.971.617.268.417.365.717.264.717.365.217.462.517.359.617.559.918.166.917.572.717.26829.780.21.349.2median 17.6HP Omen 15-ce002ngmedian 66.21.74.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP Omen 15-ce002ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Idle power consumption was very low thanks to Nvidia Optimus, and at just 12-18 W it was much lower than notebooks with G-Sync (such as, for example, the Omen 15’s predecessor) that were usually more in the realm of 18-30 W. Under load, the Omen 15 consumed between 92 and 142 W, which was above average for a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti device. The Medion Erazer X6603 only consumed 81-112 W of power.

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.3 / 1.1 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 12 / 14 / 18 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 92 / 142 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8300H
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ
Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
Power Consumption
-30%
23%
6%
38%
40%
20%
Idle Minimum *
12
18
-50%
4.9
59%
10
17%
4.7
61%
4
67%
8.2
32%
Idle Average *
14
23
-64%
8.5
39%
13
7%
7.6
46%
6.9
51%
11.1
21%
Idle Maximum *
18
30
-67%
9.1
49%
19
-6%
9.2
49%
9.4
48%
11.8
34%
Load Average *
92
85
8%
90.7
1%
68
26%
81
12%
72.6
21%
81
12%
Load Maximum *
142
158
-11%
144
-1%
136
4%
112
21%
122
14%
123.3
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
100
96
4%
110
-10%
110
-10%
95.11
5%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

Despite its high power consumption under load the Omen 15 still lasted longer than most other notebooks. Almost 8.5 hours in our video playback or Wi-Fi test at a normalized brightness is exceptional for a gaming notebook. Even the long-running Dell G5 only lasted for 5.5-6.5 hours and was thus unable to keep up while the rest of the competition ran out of power even sooner. When idle and at minimum brightness the Omen 15 lasted for up to 10.5 hours. Under load and at maximum display brightness it ran out of juice after 1-2 hours. 3D performance was reduced by around 20 % on battery (The Witcher 3 @ FHD/Ultra).

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
10h 26min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 26min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
1h 46min
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, 70 Wh
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 70 Wh
Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8300H, 56 Wh
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, 55 Wh
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, 45 Wh
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, 48 Wh
Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, 64 Wh
Battery Runtime
-50%
-6%
-39%
-52%
-23%
-20%
Reader / Idle
626
256
-59%
705
13%
386
-38%
340
-46%
592
-5%
647
3%
H.264
506
224
-56%
325
-36%
265
-48%
227
-55%
306
-40%
WiFi v1.3
514
198
-61%
391
-24%
275
-46%
257
-50%
336
-35%
348
-32%
Load
106
80
-25%
133
25%
80
-25%
46
-57%
94
-11%
73
-31%

Verdict

Artılar

+ great price-performance ratio
+ decent connectivity distribution
+ thin display bezels
+ compact power supply
+ long battery life

Eksiler

- mediocre display (PWM, response times, brightness, color-space coverage)
- high temperature and noise emissions under load
- poor SSD write performance
- no Thunderbolt 3
HP Omen 15. Review unit courtesy of Cyberport.
HP Omen 15. Review unit courtesy of Cyberport.

Giriş seviyesi Omen 15, $ 1,000 fiyat aralığındaki en iyi oyun notebooklarından biri oldu.

Doğru, Core i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ve 8 GB DDR4 RAM kombinasyonu özellikle geleceğe yönelik olmayabilir. Ancak, 15 inçlik bir Omen 15 konuştuğumuz gibi, neredeyse tüm oyunları yüksek ayarlarla yüksek hızlarda çalıştırabilir ve bu nedenle bir bütçe üzerindeki oyuncular için idealdir.

HP'nin fiyatı 1.000 dolarlık eşiğin altında tutabilmesi için köşeleri kesmek zorunda kaldı; örneğin, düşük renk alanı kapsama alanı ve düşük ekran parlaklığı, SSD'nin kötü yazma performansı veya Thunderbolt 3'ün olmaması gibi.

Bu dezavantajları dikkate almazsanız, şık bir çanta, iyi giriş cihazları, bol miktarda bağlantı noktası ve iyi bir ses performansı ile çok iyi dengelenmiş bir oyun dizüstü bilgisayarı elde edersiniz. Dar ekranlı çerçeveler ve uzun pil ömrü, bu cihazın en önemli iki özelliği.

Rakiplerinin aynı anda daha soğuk ve sessiz olduğu göz önüne alındığında HP, Omen 15’in soğutma çözümüne hitap etmelidir. Özellikle Core i7-8750H modelinin kısa süre içinde kullanıma sunulacağı düşünülürse.

HP Omen 15-dc0001ng - 07/26/2018 v6
Florian Glaser

İşcilik
79 / 98 → 81%
Klavye
81%
Mouse
78%
Bağlanılabilirlik
66 / 81 → 82%
Ağırlık
60 / 10-66 → 90%
Batarya
90%
Görüntü
80%
Oyun performansı
90%
Uygulama performansı
95%
Isınma
78 / 95 → 82%
Ses
72 / 90 → 79%
Audio
74%
Ortalama
79%
84%
Gaming - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > HP Omen 15 (i5-8300H, GTX 1050 Ti, FHD) Laptop
Florian Glaser, 2018-07-29 (Update: 2018-07-31)