Notebookcheck

Kısa inceleme: Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, Full-HD) Laptop

Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn, 04/14/2018

Artık 6 çekirdekli Intel'ın Coffe-Lake mimari artık piyasada ve üreticiler kullanıma başladı. Aero 15X v8 144 Hz ekran ve 6 çekirdekli işlemci ile geliyor.

Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Aero 15 Seri)
Grafik kartı
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Çekirdek: 1215 MHz, Bellek: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 388.92, Optimus
Bellek
16384 MB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Single-Channel, 1 of 2 slots used, max. 32 GB
Görüntü
15.6 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LGD05C0, IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, parlak: hayır
Anakart
Intel HM370
Harddisk
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, 512 GB 
, M.2-SSD
Ses kartı
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Bağlantılar
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: combo headphone/microphone, Kart okuyucular: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Network
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 18 x 356 x 250
Batarya
94.24 Wh, 6200 mAh Lithium-Ion
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: 2.0, Klavye: Chiclet RGB, Klavye ışığı: evet, 215 W power supply, driver DVD, user guide, warranty information, additional tools, Adobe Reader XI, MS Office Trial, XSplit Broadcaster Trial, XSplit Gamecaster Trial, 24 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
2.077 kg, Güç kaynağı: 566 g
Fiyat
2500 EUR
Bağlantılar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
191 MB/s ∼100%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181 MB/s ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=205)
90.1 MB/s ∼47% -53%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82 MB/s ∼43% -57%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
204 MB/s ∼84% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=203)
109 MB/s ∼45% -55%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s ∼37% -63%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
698 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
684 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
682 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
682 MBit/s ∼98%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=178)
595 MBit/s ∼85% -13%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
585 MBit/s ∼100% +54%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
551 MBit/s ∼94% +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=178)
535 MBit/s ∼91% +41%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
524 MBit/s ∼90% +38%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
379 MBit/s ∼65%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
354 MBit/s ∼61% -7%
310
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 338 cd/m² Ortalama: 300.4 cd/m² Minimum: 9 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 78 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 313 cd/m²
Kontrast: 948:1 (Siyah: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.29 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 0.69 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
94% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Chi Mei N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), TN LED, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Triton 700
AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-156%
40%
34%
-166%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
43.2 (22.8, 20.4)
-157%
10.4 (6, 4.4)
38%
6.6 (3.4, 3.2)
61%
44.8 (21.2, 23.6)
-167%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 (6, 5.2)
28.4 (15.6, 12.8)
-154%
6.6 (4.4, 2.2)
41%
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
7%
29.6 (15.6, 14)
-164%
PWM Frequency
26000 (20)
25510 (25)
Screen
-179%
-58%
-157%
-155%
Brightness middle
313
338
8%
269
-14%
307
-2%
291
-7%
Brightness
300
324
8%
254
-15%
296
-1%
277
-8%
Brightness Distribution
78
88
13%
85
9%
89
14%
84
8%
Black Level *
0.33
0.34
-3%
0.21
36%
0.25
24%
0.22
33%
Contrast
948
994
5%
1281
35%
1228
30%
1323
40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.29
5.92
-359%
3
-133%
5.74
-345%
5.52
-328%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.04
11.77
-477%
5.62
-175%
11.32
-455%
10.72
-425%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
0.69
7.45
-980%
3.18
-361%
6.44
-833%
6.59
-855%
Gamma
2.43 91%
2.58 85%
2.25 98%
2.48 89%
2.44 90%
CCT
6550 99%
6366 102%
7274 89%
8395 77%
7816 83%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
59
-2%
77
28%
60
0%
58
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
90
-4%
100
6%
93
-1%
89
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.94
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-168% / -175%
-9% / -42%
-62% / -125%
-161% / -157%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8964 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
Latency
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=48)
173 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points ∼97% -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
158 Points ∼90% -10%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 209, n=416)
152 Points ∼87% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
1168 Points ∼100% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1133 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=51)
1105 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1865, n=417)
745 Points ∼64% -34%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼64% -35%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points ∼63% -35%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points ∼63% -35%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1.89 - 2, n=32)
1.966 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points ∼97% -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.84 Points ∼93% -7%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=406)
1.679 Points ∼85% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
13.29 Points ∼100% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.93 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (9.54 - 13.5, n=33)
12.3 Points ∼93% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.21 Points ∼62% -37%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points ∼61% -37%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.13 Points ∼61% -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.2, n=507)
7.26 Points ∼55% -44%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.98 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.93 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
175 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1133 Points
Yardım
PCMark 10 - Score
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5277 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5194 Points ∼98% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (4910 - 5362, n=7)
5122 Points ∼97% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5059 Points ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6959, n=116)
4936 Points ∼94% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4933 Points ∼93% -2%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
4542 Points ∼86% -10%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5676 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5662 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (5323 - 5751, n=8)
5632 Points ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5211 Points ∼92% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5195 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
5176 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=311)
4921 Points ∼87% -13%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5160 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4627 Points ∼90% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (4393 - 4665, n=8)
4555 Points ∼88% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4504 Points ∼87%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4394 Points ∼85% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=329)
4218 Points ∼82% -6%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
4193 Points ∼81% -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4504 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5676 puan
Yardım
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Acer Predator Triton 700
2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
Average Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
 
AS SSD
39%
48%
37%
42%
6%
Score Total
2536
3570
41%
3848
52%
3649
44%
3282
29%
2444 (1979 - 2581, n=8)
-4%
Score Write
939
1333
42%
1185
26%
1446
54%
1243
32%
869 (557 - 981, n=8)
-7%
Score Read
1092
1522
39%
1795
64%
1471
35%
1350
24%
1069 (962 - 1118, n=8)
-2%
4K Write
80.44
113.85
42%
124.7
55%
90.23
12%
92.99
16%
102 (60.8 - 134, n=8)
27%
4K Read
23.36
46.56
99%
51.03
118%
43.42
86%
41.47
78%
31 (19.5 - 41.4, n=8)
33%
Seq Write
1163.11
1124.4
-3%
1280.96
10%
1580.23
36%
2371.95
104%
1175 (958 - 1342, n=8)
1%
Seq Read
2212.97
2507.7
13%
2382.08
8%
2090.99
-6%
2517.2
14%
2096 (1794 - 2261, n=8)
-5%
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2627 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1375 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 332.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 268.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1404 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1335 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 37.65 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 94.43 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
18120 Points ∼100% +20%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17046 Points ∼94% +12%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
15156 Points ∼84%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (14146 - 16165, n=14)
14844 Points ∼82% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14607 Points ∼81% -4%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14394 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=444)
10245 Points ∼57% -32%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
23694 Points ∼100% +24%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
21925 Points ∼93% +14%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
19162 Points ∼81%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (17680 - 20829, n=16)
18908 Points ∼80% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18689 Points ∼79% -2%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18205 Points ∼77% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=517)
11870 Points ∼50% -38%
3DMark 11 Performance
15502 puan
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
152533 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34461 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13281 puan
Yardım
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
62.9 fps ∼100% +20%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
59.4 fps ∼94% +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (46 - 95.4, n=18)
53.5 fps ∼85% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
52.4 fps ∼83% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
52.4 fps ∼83%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
50.2 fps ∼80% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=222)
44.7 fps ∼71% -15%
düşük orta yüksek ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 92.852.4fps
FIFA 18 (2017) 153152fps
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) 89.483fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 88.978.5fps
Fortnite (2018) 122101fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 51.7fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 64.850.2fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 7975fps

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta
30 / 31 / 35 dB
Çalışırken
49 / 54 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
sessiz
40 dB(A)
duyulabilirlik
50 dB(A)
gürültülü
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm uzaklık)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
4%
4%
2%
0%
3%
3%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
30
-3%
29
-0%
31
-7%
29.4 (28 - 30.7, n=14)
-1%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=225)
-1%
Idle Minimum *
30
31
-3%
31
-3%
30
-0%
33
-10%
30.6 (28.5 - 33, n=15)
-2%
31.6 (28 - 41.7, n=648)
-5%
Idle Average *
31
32
-3%
34
-10%
31
-0%
34
-10%
32 (28.5 - 37, n=15)
-3%
32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=648)
-6%
Idle Maximum *
35
36
-3%
35
-0%
33
6%
40
-14%
35 (30.1 - 43, n=15)
-0%
34.7 (28 - 50.4, n=648)
1%
Load Average *
49
39
20%
42
14%
49
-0%
41
16%
43.3 (35.2 - 49, n=15)
12%
40.4 (30.3 - 58, n=649)
18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
44
14%
44
14%
50
2%
43
16%
Load Maximum *
54
52
4%
46
15%
52
4%
48
11%
48.1 (40.2 - 54.2, n=15)
11%
47.7 (38.9 - 64, n=649)
12%

* ... smaller is better

Maksimum yük
 48 °C53 °C52 °C 
 38 °C44 °C39 °C 
 36 °C38 °C36 °C 
Maksimum: 53 °C
Ortalama: 42.7 °C
65 °C65 °C53 °C
56 °C57 °C43 °C
39 °C40 °C38 °C
Maksimum: 65 °C
Ortalama: 50.7 °C
Güç kaynağı  44 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 65 °C / 149 F, compared to the average of 41.7 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-9.3 °C / -16.7 F).
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
9%
7%
1%
-10%
1%
4%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
51
4%
47
11%
52
2%
61
-15%
52.1 (46.6 - 58, n=15)
2%
45.5 (28 - 68.8, n=613)
14%
Maximum Bottom *
65
58
11%
63
3%
49
25%
69
-6%
57.4 (41.2 - 65, n=15)
12%
49.1 (25.9 - 78, n=611)
24%
Idle Upper Side *
26
25
4%
25
4%
31
-19%
29
-12%
29.2 (24 - 33, n=15)
-12%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=564)
-18%
Idle Bottom *
30
25
17%
27
10%
31
-3%
32
-7%
29.9 (25 - 34, n=15)
-0%
31.6 (21.1 - 50.3, n=562)
-5%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.144.62535.6403128.430.44033.537.75026.428.56325.527.48029.23010028.932.312524.532.916021.141.520020.748.525020.955.931519.561.240018.465.150018.366.463017.567.68001867.9100018.665.3125017.469.2160016.765.8200017.264.5250017.365.9315017.268400017.257.3500017.256.4630017.261.1800017.3661000017.262.21250017.259.6160001754.1SPL29.777.5N1.342.2median 17.4median 62.2Delta1.86.835.935.83030.626.127.431.6312627.124.830.326.535.725.238.623.629.522.335.921.94320.752.820.360.119.364.61966.818.772.11876.218.184.6188618.279.917.974.61869.618.169.917.963.61862.31869.817.963.717.860.317.757.317.657.930.3901.467.4median 18.1median 63.71.16.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte Aero 15X v8MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.5 / 0.8 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 14 / 18 / 22 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 91 / 173 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
17%
9%
-16%
-52%
5%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
14
10
29%
12
14%
16
-14%
28
-100%
11.7 (7 - 19.1, n=15)
16%
20.1 (3.9 - 113, n=608)
-44%
Idle Average *
18
13
28%
16
11%
19
-6%
33
-83%
15.9 (11 - 20.8, n=15)
12%
25.7 (6.8 - 119, n=608)
-43%
Idle Maximum *
22
20
9%
21
5%
26
-18%
41
-86%
21.1 (13.7 - 29, n=15)
4%
30.8 (8.3 - 122, n=608)
-40%
Load Average *
91
79
13%
85
7%
103
-13%
94
-3%
98.1 (73.7 - 143, n=15)
-8%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=599)
-14%
Load Maximum *
173
165
5%
162
6%
223
-29%
222
-28%
174 (150 - 211, n=15)
-1%
166 (21.9 - 590, n=598)
4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
142
120
15%
128
10%
164
-15%
160
-13%

* ... smaller is better

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
12h 42min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 24min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
2h 36min
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, 94.24 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 94.2 Wh
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 52.4 Wh
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, 55 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 54 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-3%
-57%
-65%
-72%
-53%
Reader / Idle
762
781
2%
340
-55%
237
-69%
150
-80%
331 (39 - 1174, n=595)
-57%
H.264
504
456
-10%
229
-55%
159
-68%
106
-79%
244 (88 - 506, n=122)
-52%
WiFi v1.3
513
491
-4%
232
-55%
164
-68%
144
-72%
250 (78 - 622, n=269)
-51%
Load
156
157
1%
61
-61%
70
-55%
70
-55%
78.5 (18 - 202, n=561)
-50%

Artılar

+ X-Rite Pantone certified
+ slim and light chassis
+ great battery life
+ high build quality
+ thin bezels
+ RGB keyboard
+ subtle design
+ great additional software
+ 144 Hz panel
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ NVMe-SSD

Eksiler

- loud during 3D workloads
- high temperature under load
- sound could be improved
- brightness not perfectly distributed

Error: More than one (2) Pro / Contra Item for this review found!

Aero 15X v8 test model provided by Gigabyte Germany
Aero 15X v8 test model provided by Gigabyte Germany

İnce, yüksek kalite üst sınıf laptoplar söz konusu olduğunda Gigabyte Aero 15X ve Asus GM501 tepe için yarışıyor. Her biri de kendi güçlü ve zayıf yönlerine sahip.

ROG Zepyhrus M daha güçlü bir ekran kartına sahip ve düşük sıcaklık değerleri ile gelirken Gigabyte daha iyi arayüzler, daha fazla bağlantı olanağı ve daha uzun batarya ömrü ile geliyor. Dar ekran çerçevesi ve renk tutarlılığı da kalabalıktan ayrılmasını sağlıyor.

Tüm bunlara karşın Gigabyte'ın sistem sesini kontrol altına alması gerek. Şu haliyle rahatsız edici olmasa da duyulabilir ses çıkarması duyarlı kullanıcıların satın almasını önleyebilir. Intel'ın 6 çekirdekl çipi soğutma sistemini sınırlarına 4 çekirdekli işlemcilere göre daha çabuk ve sık getiriyor.

İncelemenin orjinali için tıklayın.

Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 - 04/04/2018 v6
Florian Glaser

İşcilik
87 / 98 → 89%
Klavye
83%
Mouse
78%
Bağlanılabilirlik
70 / 81 → 86%
Ağırlık
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Batarya
90%
Görüntü
91%
Oyun performansı
96%
Uygulama performansı
97%
Isınma
75 / 95 → 79%
Ses
69 / 90 → 77%
Audio
74%
Ortalama
81%
88%
Gaming - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Kısa inceleme: Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, Full-HD) Laptop
Florian Glaser, 2018-04-14 (Update: 2018-04-14)