Notebookcheck

Kısa inceleme: HTC U11 Plus

Daniel Schmidt, 03/13/2018

Yeni moda. HTC U11 Plus, U11 modelinin 1 yıl sonrasında karşımızda ve çok benzer özellikler sunuyor. Daha geniş depolama alanı, yeni Super LCD ekranı göze çarpanlardan. Dahası batarya da genişlemiş.

HTC U11 Plus (U Seri)
Grafik kartı
Bellek
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Görüntü
6 inç 2:1, 2880 x 1440 pixel 537 PPI, capacitive, 10-point multi-touch, Super LCD 6, DCI-P3, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, parlak: evet
Harddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 119 GB Boş
Bağlantılar
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ses çıkışları: USB Type-C, Kart okuyucular: microSD up to 2 TB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: Edge Sensor, proximity sensor, motion sensor, magnetometer, G Sensor, sensor hub, compass, OTG, HTC Connect, DLNA, AirPlay, Miracast
Network
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1.800 und 1.900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1.900 und 2.100 MHz), LTE Cat. 15 (FDD-Band: 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, TDD: 38, 39, 40 und 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 8.5 x 158.5 x 74.9
Batarya
3930 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Konuşma süresi 3G (üreticiye göre): 24.5 h
İşletim sistemi
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (HTC UltraPixel 3, 1.40 μm, UltraSpeed AF, OIS, f/1.7, 4k video with High-Res audio, 120 fps slow motion at 1080p)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, HDR, 1080p video
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: stereo speakers, Klavye: virtual, AC adapter, data cable, ANC headset, SIM card tool, audio jack adapter, cleaning cloth, plastic case, HTC Sense, 24 Ay Garanti, HTC USonic with active noise cancellation, HTC BoomSound, Hi-Res stereo audio, Qualcomm aptX, IP68, USB Type-C, SAR value (head): 0.63 W/kg, SAR value (body): 0.67 W/kg, Hybrid dual SIM, fanless
Ağırlık
188 g
Fiyat
799 Euro
Bağlantılar

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
939 MBit/s ∼100% +172%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 MBit/s ∼70% +90%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
394 MBit/s ∼42% +14%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
386 MBit/s ∼41% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
368 MBit/s ∼39% +7%
HTC U11 Plus
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 MBit/s ∼37%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 MBit/s ∼36% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
239 MBit/s ∼25% -31%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
703 MBit/s ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s ∼93% +13%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 MBit/s ∼92% +11%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 MBit/s ∼91% +10%
HTC U11 Plus
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
583 MBit/s ∼83%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
456 MBit/s ∼65% -22%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
279 MBit/s ∼40% -52%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
225 MBit/s ∼32% -61%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
HTC U11 Plus
HTC U11 Plus
HTC U11 Plus
HTC U11 Plus
HTC U11 Plus
HTC U11 Plus

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
334
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 371 cd/m² Ortalama: 355.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.73 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 90 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 361 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1719:1 (Siyah: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.21
HTC U11 Plus
Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6
HTC U11
Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Apple iPhone X
Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
LG V30
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
OnePlus 5T
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01
Google Pixel 2 XL
P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Screen
-8%
32%
30%
40%
-51%
7%
-9%
Brightness middle
361
482
34%
560
55%
629
74%
600
66%
432
20%
425
18%
415
15%
Brightness
356
472
33%
562
58%
636
79%
606
70%
428
20%
423
19%
420
18%
Brightness Distribution
90
90
0%
93
3%
94
4%
94
4%
87
-3%
92
2%
87
-3%
Black Level *
0.21
0.33
-57%
Contrast
1719
1461
-15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.5
3.2
-28%
1.7
32%
1.7
32%
1.2
52%
4.18
-67%
2.1
16%
2.7
-8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.3
5.4
-2%
3.4
36%
3.6
32%
3
43%
8.53
-61%
3.4
36%
4.3
19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
2.2
-29%
1.6
6%
2.4
-41%
1.6
6%
5.3
-212%
2.5
-47%
3.3
-94%
Gamma
2.21 109%
2.22 108%
2.13 113%
2.15 112%
2.23 108%
2.33 103%
2.32 103%
2.36 102%
CCT
6580 99%
6581 99%
6435 101%
6337 103%
6707 97%
7487 87%
6455 101%
6787 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 9615 Hz ≤ 33 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 9615 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 33 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 9615 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9953 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.8 ms rise
↘ 21.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.1 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
183057 Points ∼80%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points ∼78% -3%
Apple iPhone X
197851 Points ∼87% +8%
LG V30
173749 Points ∼76% -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
166151 Points ∼73% -9%
OnePlus 5T
172124 Points ∼75% -6%
HTC U11
175032 Points ∼77% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼73% -10%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
179595 Points ∼79% -2%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
6695 Points ∼65%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼67% +4%
LG V30
5603 Points ∼54% -16%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6994 Points ∼68% +4%
OnePlus 5T
6595 Points ∼64% -1%
HTC U11
6828 Points ∼66% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5195 Points ∼50% -22%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6998 Points ∼68% +5%
Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
7964 Points ∼93%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼99% +6%
LG V30
6854 Points ∼80% -14%
Google Pixel 2 XL
8258 Points ∼97% +4%
OnePlus 5T
7739 Points ∼90% -3%
HTC U11
8295 Points ∼97% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼68% -27%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
8553 Points ∼100% +7%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
1159 Points ∼68%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼73% +6%
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points ∼99% +45%
LG V30
1009 Points ∼59% -13%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1186 Points ∼70% +2%
OnePlus 5T
1329 Points ∼78% +15%
HTC U11
1221 Points ∼72% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼69% 0%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
1300 Points ∼77% +12%
Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
6086 Points ∼66%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼40% -40%
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points ∼100% +52%
LG V30
5949 Points ∼64% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6142 Points ∼66% +1%
OnePlus 5T
6100 Points ∼66% 0%
HTC U11
5976 Points ∼65% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼66% +1%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6144 Points ∼66% +1%
Memory (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
3376 Points ∼76%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼94% +23%
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points ∼28% -64%
LG V30
2091 Points ∼47% -38%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2927 Points ∼66% -13%
OnePlus 5T
3845 Points ∼87% +14%
HTC U11
2085 Points ∼47% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼71% -7%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3652 Points ∼83% +8%
System (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
5926 Points ∼58%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼51% -12%
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points ∼100% +73%
LG V30
4238 Points ∼41% -28%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5914 Points ∼58% 0%
OnePlus 5T
5872 Points ∼57% -1%
HTC U11
5570 Points ∼54% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼52% -10%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
5918 Points ∼58% 0%
Overall (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
3447 Points ∼91%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼83% -9%
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points ∼99% +8%
LG V30
2702 Points ∼71% -22%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3351 Points ∼88% -3%
OnePlus 5T
3678 Points ∼97% +7%
HTC U11
3034 Points ∼80% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼87% -4%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3625 Points ∼96% +5%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
7946 Points ∼55%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points ∼60% +8%
LG V30
8016 Points ∼56% +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
7568 Points ∼53% -5%
OnePlus 5T
8000 Points ∼56% +1%
HTC U11
8281 Points ∼58% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
8295 Points ∼58% +4%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
6771 Points ∼26%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼26% 0%
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points ∼40% +51%
LG V30
6078 Points ∼23% -10%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6253 Points ∼24% -8%
OnePlus 5T
6670 Points ∼26% -1%
HTC U11
6443 Points ∼25% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼26% -1%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6711 Points ∼26% -1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
1935 Points ∼33%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼32% -2%
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points ∼72% +120%
LG V30
1900 Points ∼32% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1916 Points ∼32% -1%
OnePlus 5T
1962 Points ∼33% +1%
HTC U11
1906 Points ∼32% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼34% +4%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
1911 Points ∼32% -1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
3049 Points ∼97%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼91% -6%
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points ∼75% -23%
LG V30
2931 Points ∼93% -4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3028 Points ∼96% -1%
OnePlus 5T
3068 Points ∼97% +1%
HTC U11
2841 Points ∼90% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼78% -19%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
2986 Points ∼95% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
3987 Points ∼74%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼53% -29%
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points ∼64% -13%
LG V30
3903 Points ∼72% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3872 Points ∼72% -3%
OnePlus 5T
4016 Points ∼75% +1%
HTC U11
3883 Points ∼72% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼65% -13%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3991 Points ∼74% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
3732 Points ∼96%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼73% -24%
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points ∼81% -16%
LG V30
3635 Points ∼94% -3%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3646 Points ∼94% -2%
OnePlus 5T
3758 Points ∼97% +1%
HTC U11
3590 Points ∼92% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼82% -15%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3713 Points ∼96% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
3071 Points ∼99%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼94% -6%
LG V30
2808 Points ∼91% -9%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2995 Points ∼97% -2%
OnePlus 5T
3031 Points ∼98% -1%
HTC U11
2832 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points ∼80% -20%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3071 Points ∼99% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
6060 Points ∼78%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼43% -45%
LG V30
5895 Points ∼76% -3%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5856 Points ∼76% -3%
OnePlus 5T
5791 Points ∼75% -4%
HTC U11
5877 Points ∼76% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points ∼62% -21%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6035 Points ∼78% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
4982 Points ∼99%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼64% -35%
LG V30
4738 Points ∼94% -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4831 Points ∼96% -3%
OnePlus 5T
4816 Points ∼96% -3%
HTC U11
4744 Points ∼94% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points ∼79% -21%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
4969 Points ∼99% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
20820 Points ∼26%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼29% +9%
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points ∼32% +23%
LG V30
14601 Points ∼18% -30%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20233 Points ∼26% -3%
OnePlus 5T
21348 Points ∼27% +3%
HTC U11
20140 Points ∼25% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼26% 0%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
21239 Points ∼27% +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
58307 Points ∼12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼7% -42%
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points ∼24% +93%
LG V30
55271 Points ∼12% -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
54156 Points ∼11% -7%
OnePlus 5T
58097 Points ∼12% 0%
HTC U11
55725 Points ∼12% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼7% -43%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
55485 Points ∼12% -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
41644 Points ∼20%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼15% -27%
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points ∼31% +54%
LG V30
34139 Points ∼16% -18%
Google Pixel 2 XL
39456 Points ∼19% -5%
OnePlus 5T
42022 Points ∼20% +1%
HTC U11
40014 Points ∼19% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼14% -30%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
40848 Points ∼20% -2%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
113 fps ∼8%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼8% -1%
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps ∼13% +57%
LG V30
113 fps ∼8% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
112 fps ∼8% -1%
OnePlus 5T
113 fps ∼8% 0%
HTC U11
91 fps ∼7% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼8% -8%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
105 fps ∼8% -7%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
60 fps ∼13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps ∼13% -1%
LG V30
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼13% -2%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼13% 0%
HTC U11
58 fps ∼13% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼13% -3%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
60 fps ∼13% 0%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
60 fps ∼11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼10% -10%
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps ∼16% +47%
LG V30
59 fps ∼11% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼11% -2%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼11% 0%
HTC U11
51 fps ∼9% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9% -17%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
54 fps ∼10% -10%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
35 fps ∼10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼15% +60%
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps ∼16% +67%
LG V30
35 fps ∼10% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
35 fps ∼10% 0%
OnePlus 5T
53 fps ∼15% +51%
HTC U11
29 fps ∼8% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼10% +9%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
36 fps ∼10% +3%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
41 fps ∼10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼9% -10%
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps ∼12% +19%
LG V30
40 fps ∼10% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
41 fps ∼10% 0%
OnePlus 5T
41 fps ∼10% 0%
HTC U11
33 fps ∼8% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼10% +2%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
40 fps ∼10% -2%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
21 fps ∼12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼22% +81%
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps ∼25% +110%
LG V30
19 fps ∼11% -10%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20 fps ∼11% -5%
OnePlus 5T
37 fps ∼21% +76%
HTC U11
15 fps ∼9% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼13% +10%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
22 fps ∼13% +5%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
25 fps ∼7%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼6% -16%
LG V30
24 fps ∼7% -4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
24 fps ∼7% -4%
OnePlus 5T
25 fps ∼7% 0%
HTC U11
24 fps ∼7% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps ∼7% 0%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
25 fps ∼7% 0%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
13 fps ∼11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼19% +69%
LG V30
13 fps ∼11% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
13 fps ∼11% 0%
OnePlus 5T
23 fps ∼20% +77%
HTC U11
13 fps ∼11% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps ∼11% 0%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
15 fps ∼13% +15%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
38.71 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21.49 fps ∼56% -44%
Google Pixel 2 XL
37.71 fps ∼97% -3%
HTC U11
36.58 fps ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25.06 fps ∼65% -35%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
25922 Points ∼59%
HTC U11
38752 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42335 Points ∼96%
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
39033 Points ∼87%
HTC U11
44696 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
41901 Points ∼93%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
868 Points ∼46%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
788 Points ∼42% -9%
Apple iPhone X
1702 Points ∼91% +96%
Google Pixel 2 XL
853 Points ∼46% -2%
HTC U11
812 Points ∼43% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1280 Points ∼68% +47%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
59.7 fps ∼97%
HTC U11
60 fps ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
59.7 fps ∼97%

Legend

 
HTC U11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points ∼100% +245%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
69.51 Points ∼31% +7%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
66.689 Points ∼30% +3%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
66.477 Points ∼30% +2%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)
64.948 Points ∼29%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
64.709 Points ∼29% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
62.198 Points ∼28% -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.63 Points ∼25% -13%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points ∼24% -19%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points ∼100% +205%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
14050 Points ∼40% +22%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
12929 Points ∼37% +12%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
12509 Points ∼35% +8%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
11781 Points ∼33% +2%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)
11553 Points ∼33%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
11308 Points ∼32% -2%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points ∼30% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points ∼30% -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * ∼100% -16%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3590.6 ms * ∼99% -15%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
3434.1 ms * ∼95% -10%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
3175.3 ms * ∼87% -1%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)
3131.6 ms * ∼86%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
3096 ms * ∼85% +1%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
2760.3 ms * ∼76% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2236.7 ms * ∼62% +29%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms * ∼20% +77%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points ∼100% +98%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
194 Points ∼55% +8%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
181 Points ∼51% +1%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)
179 Points ∼51%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
162 Points ∼46% -9%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
161 Points ∼45% -10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points ∼45% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
154 Points ∼44% -14%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points ∼39% -23%

* ... smaller is better

HTC U11 PlusSamsung Galaxy S8 PlusLG V30Motorola Moto Z2 ForceHonor View 10
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
-29%
-4%
11%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
51.26 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
57.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
12%
47.2
-8%
54.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
65.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
62.8
-17%
77.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
Random Write 4KB
135.69
15.27
-89%
10.21
-92%
78.62
-42%
160
18%
Random Read 4KB
132.39
127.18
-4%
78.17
-41%
148.76
12%
144.3
9%
Sequential Write 256KB
207.94
194.18
-7%
193.22
-7%
213.61
3%
194.3
-7%
Sequential Read 256KB
728.37
787.6
8%
669.48
-8%
696.35
-4%
810.3
11%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 AyarlarDeğer
 high29 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 AyarlarDeğer
 high59 fps
Maksimum yük
 36.8 °C35.9 °C35.7 °C 
 36.1 °C36.5 °C35.6 °C 
 35.9 °C35.7 °C34.1 °C 
Maksimum: 36.8 °C
Ortalama: 35.8 °C
31.9 °C33.3 °C34.1 °C
31.6 °C32.5 °C36.1 °C
31.2 °C32.2 °C34.4 °C
Maksimum: 36.1 °C
Ortalama: 33 °C
Güç kaynağı  29 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
HTC U11 Plus: pink noise graph
Pink noise graph
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.236.52532.936.43137.233.84031.733.95039.634.56328.328.78027.327.110026.931.912526.737.21602443.420020.949.925020.950.831519.555.540018.563.450017.56663017.565.180015.770.1100015.874.9125016.675160015.875.4200015.474.2250015.57531501675.6400015.874.850001674.9630016.375.8800016.372.31000016.268.41250016.459.31600016.448.7SPL28.686N1.165.4median 16.4HTC U11 Plusmedian 68.4Delta2.111.931.633.925.429.825.32632.928.833.627.631.627.328.425.72730.320.834.22241.121.349.220.855.321.260.819.462.119.566.617.770.217.97217.873.417.373.617.474.416.773.317.274.118.273.217.969.817.666.917.769.617.863.817.953.818.15118.244.73082.91.356.6median 17.9Samsung Galaxy S8 Plusmedian 66.61.31135.246.432.941.937.237.731.736.839.640.528.330.327.330.326.928.126.732.2244520.952.120.957.119.558.518.562.617.570.917.574.715.778.515.876.916.676.215.873.415.473.615.575.51679.915.880.11676.516.37416.374.916.271.416.458.216.44228.688.41.176.2median 16.4Google Pixel 2 XLmedian 73.42.110.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HTC U11 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.03 / 0.14 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 0.51 / 1.62 / 1.87 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 3.92 / 8.27 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HTC U11 Plus
3930 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Power Consumption
-16%
10%
6%
-32%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
0.51
0.73
-43%
0.68
-33%
0.58
-14%
1.28
-151%
0.85
-67%
Idle Average *
1.62
1.96
-21%
1.13
30%
1.44
11%
1.87
-15%
1.15
29%
Idle Maximum *
1.87
1.98
-6%
1.16
38%
1.53
18%
1.89
-1%
1.23
34%
Load Average *
3.92
4.82
-23%
4.69
-20%
3.17
19%
3.73
5%
4.12
-5%
Load Maximum *
8.27
7.15
14%
5.24
37%
8.54
-3%
8.08
2%
8.42
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
27h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 63)
10h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 11min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
4h 51min
HTC U11 Plus
3930 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
2730 mAh
Battery Runtime
-19%
33%
-15%
11%
8%
11%
Reader / Idle
1625
1250
-23%
1744
7%
1292
-20%
1754
8%
1565
-4%
1630
0%
H.264
611
498
-18%
929
52%
634
4%
799
31%
742
21%
811
33%
WiFi v1.3
607
560
-8%
818
35%
564
-7%
718
18%
736
21%
531
-13%
Load
291
212
-27%
398
37%
180
-38%
257
-12%
275
-5%
354
22%

Artılar

+ Hızlı sistem çipi
+ Harika kamera
+ Tutarlı GPS
+ Genişletilebilir depolama alanı
+ Çift SIM
+ Harici bir ekrana bağlanmak için de kullanılabilen hızlı USB
+ Kutudan çıkan harika kulaklıklar
+ İyi hoparlörler
+ Su ve toza karşı dayanıklılık

Eksiler

- Ekran çok karanlık
- Kamera uygulamasında çok fazla seçenek yok
- Ortalama MicroSD hızları
In review: HTC U11 Plus. Review device provided courtesy of: notebooksbilliger.de
In review: HTC U11 Plus. Review device provided courtesy of: notebooksbilliger.de

U11 Plus ile HTC tasarımına sadık kalıyor. Hzılı sistem çipi, geniş depolama alanı, su ve toza karşı dayanıklılık, tutarlı GPS gibi birçok iyi özelliği var.

Ama malesef ekranı farkedilir şekilde karanlık. Bu da güneşli günlerde kullanımda sorun olabilir. Bir diğer sorun ise LTE bağlantısının kısıtlı olması ve sadece kategori 15 hızları ile kalması.

Kalın bataryası ile harika kullanım süreleri sunsa da böylesi bir boyuttaki bataryadan daha iyisini beklerdik. Sistem performansı oldukça iyi. Piyasadaki en hızlı Android telefonlardan biri diyebiliriz.

HTC U11 Plus - 02/28/2018 v6
Daniel Schmidt

İşcilik
89%
Klavye
69 / 75 → 91%
Mouse
94%
Bağlanılabilirlik
66 / 60 → 100%
Ağırlık
89%
Batarya
92%
Görüntü
86%
Oyun performansı
65 / 63 → 100%
Uygulama performansı
69 / 70 → 99%
Isınma
90%
Ses
100%
Audio
79 / 91 → 87%
Camera
85%
Ortalama
83%
89%
Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Kısa inceleme: HTC U11 Plus
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-03-13 (Update: 2018-03-13)