Notebookcheck Logo

MSI Prestige 14 Evo dizüstü bilgisayar incelemesi: Intel yetişiyor

Rat race. Normal Prestige 14 öncelikli olarak multimedya sektörünü hedef alırken, 14 Evo özel bir GPU eksikliğinden dolayı iş kullanıcıları için tasarlanmıştır. İncelememizde Tiger Lake çipinin çeşitli AMD rakiplerine karşı nasıl performans gösterdiğini öğrenin.
MSI Prestige 14 Evo

1.000 ila 1.500 Euro (~ 1.213 $ ve ~ 1.819 $) arasında fiyat aralığında mobil kullanım için hem güçlü hem de kompakt bir iş dizüstü bilgisayarı arıyorsanız, MSI Prestige 14 Evo'yu beğenebilirsiniz. 1.300 Euro'nun (~ 1.577 $) biraz altında olan test ettiğimiz A11M-005 modeli, Core i7-1185G7 ile Intel'in Tiger Lake neslinden modern bir dört çekirdekli yonga sunuyor. Bu, 16 GB DDR4 RAM ve 512 GB M.2 SSD tarafından desteklenir. Ekran, ince çerçeve tasarımına sahip mat bir Full HD IPS paneldir. Cihaz, Intel (Evo platformu) ile yakın işbirliği içinde geliştirildi.

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 (Prestige 14 Seri)
İşlemci
Intel Core i7-1185G7 4 x 3 - 4.8 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 64 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-UP3
Grafik kartı
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Çekirdek: 1350 MHz, Bellek: 2000 MHz, DDR4, 27.20.100.8935 DCH
Bellek
16 GB 
, LPDDR4x-4267, dual-channel, on-board
Görüntü
14.00 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, AUO B140HAN06.2 (AUO623D), IPS level, Full HD, parlak: hayır, 60 Hz
Anakart
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Harddisk
Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162, 512 GB 
, PCIe SSD, slots: 1x M.2 2280 (full)
Ses kartı
Intel Tiger Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Bağlantılar
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Ses çıkışları: combined (headset/mic), Kart okuyucular: microSD (UHS-III), 1 Parmak izi okuyucu
Network
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 16 x 319 x 215
Batarya
52.4 Wh, 4600 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3 cells
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD (720p, 30 fps)
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: 2.0, Klavye: chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, 65-watt power adapter, MSI Center, 24 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
1.2 kg, Güç kaynağı: 214 g
Fiyat
1 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Prestige 14 Evo'nun rakipleri arasında Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA (Core i7-1165G7), Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE (Ryzen 7 4800U), HP EliteBook 845 G7 gibi dGPU'suz diğer 14 inçlik iş cihazları yer alıyor Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U) ve Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ (Ryzen 7 4700U). Yukarıda belirtilen tüm dizüstü bilgisayarlar, tablolarda karşılaştırma cihazları olarak görünür.

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82.5 %
01/2021
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.2 kg16 mm14.00"1920x1080
84.2 %
10/2020
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.2 kg13.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
85.3 %
08/2020
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
R7 4800U, Vega 8
1.4 kg14.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
88.2 %
12/2020
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7
1.4 kg17.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
86.5 %
06/2020
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
R7 4700U, Vega 7
1.2 kg16.55 mm14.00"1920x1080

Durum

İlk bakışta 14 Evo, "geleneksel" Prestige 14'e çok benziyor, ancak daha yakından bakıldığında ve dokunuşta birkaç farklılık ortaya çıkıyor. Bu şekilde, 14 Evo sadece biraz daha kararlı bir dokunmatik yüzeye sahip olmakla kalmıyor, aynı zamanda farklı bir klavye düzenine ve daha ince bir tuş etiketlemesine sahip. MSI ayrıca bağlantı noktası yapılandırmasını ve dağıtımını da değiştirdi (Thunderbolt 3 yerine Thunderbolt 4, kart okuyucu yeniden konumlandırıldı, 1 USB bağlantı noktası daha az) Aksi takdirde, kasa aynı özelliklere sahip. Geniş metal yüzeyler, şasinin çok yüksek kaliteli görünmesini sağlar, ancak yapı kalitesi biraz daha iyi olabilir (üst ve alt kapak arasındaki geçiş biraz serttir). Bu tür kompakt bir cihaz için kararlılık iyidir, ancak bazı yerlerde güçlü basınç altında yüzeyler bazen belirgin şekilde bükülür. Bununla birlikte, bu eksiklik günlük kullanımda pek rahatsız edici değildir.

MSI Prestige 14 Evo
MSI Prestige 14 Evo
MSI Prestige 14 Evo
MSI Prestige 14 Evo
MSI Prestige 14 Evo
MSI Prestige 14 Evo
MSI Prestige 14 Evo
MSI Prestige 14 Evo
MSI Prestige 14 Evo
MSI Prestige 14 Evo

Kompakt demişken: 31,9 x 21,5 cm kaplama alanı ve 1,6 cm toplam yüksekliği ile 14 inçlik masa veya çantada fazla yer kaplamaz. Düşük ağırlık (sadece 1,2 kg) ayrıca nakliye uygunluğuna katkıda bulunur. Şık tasarım için daha fazla artı puan verilir. Prestige 14 Evo her ortamda güzel görünür.

Boyut karşılaştırması

324 mm 215 mm 17.9 mm 1.4 kg323.4 mm 218.9 mm 16.55 mm 1.2 kg320.6 mm 208.2 mm 14.9 mm 1.4 kg319 mm 215 mm 16 mm 1.2 kg319 mm 208 mm 13.9 mm 1.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Bağlantı

Portlar açısından MSI, "Apple trendini" takip ediyor ve 14 Evo'yu sadece bir avuç portla donatıyor. Sol taraftaki ve dizüstü bilgisayarı şarj etmek için de kullanılan iki modern Thunderbolt 4 bağlantı noktasına ek olarak, 14 inçlik bir USB 2.0 Type-A bağlantı noktası, bir microSD yuvası ve kulaklıklar ve mikrofonlar için 3,5 mm ses jakına sahiptir. sağ taraf. Alıcılar, bir RJ45 bağlantı noktası, bir Kensington kilit yuvası ve özel video çıkışları olmadan yapmak zorunda kalacak. Harici monitörler Thunderbolt bağlantı noktalarına bir DisplayPort / HDMI - USB-C adaptörü ve ilgili kablo aracılığıyla bağlanır.

Left side: 2x Thunderbolt 4
Left side: 2x Thunderbolt 4
Right side: 3.5 mm audio jack, microSD, USB-A 2.0
Right side: 3.5 mm audio jack, microSD, USB-A 2.0

İletişim

Intel'in AX201 yongası, test cihazımızdaki kablosuz iletişimden sorumluydu. Wi-Fi 6 modeli, 802.11a / b / g / n / ac / ax WLAN standartlarının yanı sıra Bluetooth 5.1'i destekler. 14 Evo, referans yönlendiricimiz Netgear Nighthawk AX12 (1 m mesafe) ile hız testinde çok iyi 1,110 Mb / sn gönderme ve 1,260 Mb / sn veri alma hızıyla ustalaştı; bu onu yarışmada sırasıyla ikinci ve üçüncü sıraya yerleştiriyor.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1461 (1327min - 1616max) MBit/s +32%
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1110 MBit/s
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
838 (473min - 942max) MBit/s -25%
Average of class Office
  (819 - 842, n=2, last 2 years)
831 MBit/s -25%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
734 (431min - 876max) MBit/s -34%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
660 (642min - 680max) MBit/s -41%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1343 (1313min - 1380max) MBit/s +7%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1273 (1158min - 1364max) MBit/s +1%
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1260 MBit/s
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1257 (1103min - 1325max) MBit/s 0%
Average of class Office
  (883 - 972, n=2, last 2 years)
928 MBit/s -26%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
904 (879min - 923max) MBit/s -28%

Web kamerası

Web kamerası kalitesi multimedya ve oyun cihazları için oldukça önemsiz olsa da, iş sektöründe belirli bir önemi vardır. MSI'nın bu konuda hala önemli ölçüde gelişmesi gerekiyor. Ölçümlerimize göre, ne renk üretimi ne de görüntü netliği ikna edici değil (fotoğraflara bakın).

ColorChecker
20.8 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
16 ∆E
14 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
7 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005: 15.93 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 23.36 ∆E

Aksesuarlar

Teslimat kapsamı, genel bilgi kitapçıkları ve güç adaptörü (65 watt model) ile sınırlıdır. İkincisi şaşırtıcı derecede küçük ve yaklaşık 6,5 x 6,5 x 3 cm boyutlarında kullanışlıdır, bu da nakliye için iyidir.

Bakım

Bakım söz konusu olduğunda, karışık duygularla baş başa kaldık. Kasanın altındaki çapraz başlı vidalar oldukça hızlı bir şekilde çıkarılabilse de, alt kapak ancak düz bir alet (örneğin bir spatula) ve iyi miktarda kas gücü ile sabitlenmesinden çıkarılabilir. Alıcılar, kasanın içinde çok düzenli bir düzen bekleyebilir: M.2 yuvası ve kablosuz modül, büyük pilin hemen yanında bulunur. Soğutma sistemi bir fan ve iki ısı borusundan oluşur. Aşağıdaki resimlerde RAM yuvaları arıyorsanız, maalesef hayal kırıklığına uğrayacaksınız. Belleğin tamamı anakarta lehimlenmiştir ve bu nedenle değiştirilemez veya genişletilemez - yazık.

MSI Prestige 14 Evo
MSI Prestige 14 Evo
MSI Prestige 14 Evo
MSI Prestige 14 Evo
MSI Prestige 14 Evo

Garanti

Garanti 24 ayı kapsar. Klasik bir teslim alma ve iade hizmetidir.

Giriş cihazları

Keyboard

MSI uses a chiclet model as keyboard; apart from a few exceptions, it's comfortably generous in terms of key size. However, buyers will have to make do without a number pad due to the limited space. The typing experience proves to be quite good when it comes to pressure point and stroke. In terms of volume, the keyboard is in the midfield, so it's neither quiet nor particularly loud.

We couldn't quite get used to the layout. For a German device, the key layout is - as we've seen in many other MSI models - very unconventional (single-line Enter, shifted ><| key, ...). Due to the deviations from the standard, a certain familiarization period is required. We were most annoyed by the very narrow and closely spaced Fn/Ctrl keys. In addition, the 14 Evo offers a white keyboard backlight for nighttime use or use in poor light. It offers several adjustment stages.

Chiclet keyboard ...
Chiclet keyboard ...
... with white backlighting
... with white backlighting

Dokunmatik yüzey

Dokunmatik yüzey, 14 inçlik bir cihaz için çok büyük. Yaklaşık 6.5 cm yükseklik orta olsa da, yaklaşık 14 cm genişlik tanınmayı hak ediyor ve fare imleci ile daha uzun mesafeleri kaplamayı kolaylaştırıyor. Çoklu dokunma desteği, testte kusursuz bir şekilde çalıştı. Pürüzsüz yüzey sayesinde, içerik rahatça yakınlaştırılabilir ve iki parmakla kaydırılabilir. MSI ayrıca dokunmatik yüzeyin sol üst köşesine bir parmak izi tarayıcısı entegre etti.

Görüntüle

Başlangıçta belirtildiği gibi, görüntü reprodüksiyonu, dizüstü bilgisayarın formatı için tam olarak doğru olan 1920x1080 piksel çözünürlüğe sahip bir mat IPS panel tarafından gerçekleştiriliyor.

277
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
AUO B140HAN06.2 (AUO623D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 293 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 276.6 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 89 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 293 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1628:1 (Siyah: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.099
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
AUO B140HAN06.2 (AUO623D), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 14.00
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AU Optronics AUO068B, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AU Optronics B140HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Display
-1%
2%
-1%
-45%
Display P3 Coverage
68.8
68.6
0%
71.7
4%
68.2
-1%
37.2
-46%
sRGB Coverage
99.4
98.3
-1%
99.3
0%
98.5
-1%
55.9
-44%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.9
69.8
-2%
72.9
3%
69.8
-2%
38.43
-46%
Response Times
19%
17%
-15%
28%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
59.6 ?(26.4, 33.2)
49.6 ?(27.6, 22)
17%
45.6 ?(23.6, 22)
23%
65.2 ?(30.8, 34.4)
-9%
41 ?(19, 22)
31%
Response Time Black / White *
32.8 ?(16.4, 16.4)
26.4 ?(13.2, 13.2)
20%
29.6 ?(14.8, 14.8)
10%
39.6 ?(20, 19.6)
-21%
25 ?(14, 11)
24%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-2%
-17%
1%
-80%
Brightness middle
293
375.1
28%
399.6
36%
432.5
48%
269
-8%
Brightness
277
371
34%
385
39%
405
46%
244
-12%
Brightness Distribution
89
91
2%
89
0%
86
-3%
83
-7%
Black Level *
0.18
0.34
-89%
0.37
-106%
0.3
-67%
0.23
-28%
Contrast
1628
1103
-32%
1080
-34%
1442
-11%
1170
-28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.95
1.79
39%
3.2
-8%
2.34
21%
4.94
-67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.03
3.05
49%
6.44
-7%
3.59
40%
20.37
-238%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.9
1.79
-99%
1.73
-92%
1.83
-103%
5.03
-459%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.2
2.3
45%
4.7
-12%
2.5
40%
1.71
59%
Gamma
2.099 105%
2.29 96%
2.21 100%
2.1 105%
2.52 87%
CCT
6622 98%
6405 101%
7184 90%
6582 99%
6535 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
71
63.9
-10%
66.3
-7%
63.8
-10%
35
-51%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
98.8
6%
99.5
7%
99.4
7%
56
-40%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
5% / 0%
1% / -9%
-5% / -2%
-32% / -60%

* ... smaller is better

Siyah seviyesi (0.18 cd / m²) ve kontrast (1.600: 1'in üzerinde) ikna edici olsa da, parlaklık beklentilerin ve olasılıkların gerisinde kalıyor. Ortalama 277 cd / m², öncelikle iç mekanda kullanım için uygundur ve dış mekân oturumları için uygun değildir - cihazın mobil yapısı nedeniyle can sıkıcıdır. Acer Swift 3 haricinde, tüm rakipler yaklaşık 400 cd / m² yönetiyor.

CalMAN: Grayscales
CalMAN: Grayscales
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Grayscales (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscales (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

Renk üretimi açısından, 14 Evo kendisini test alanının ortasına yerleştiriyor. Delta E 2000 değeri 2,95 (ColorChecker @Calman) ile ekran hala ideal aralıkta. Renk alanı da eleştiri için bir neden değildir: sRGB'nin% 93'ü ve AdobeRGB'nin% 71'i çoğu alıcıyı tatmin etmelidir. Ek olarak, görüş açısı dengesi, IPS paneller için tipik olduğu kadar iyidir.

MSI Prestige 14 Evo vs. sRGB (93%)
MSI Prestige 14 Evo vs. sRGB (93%)
MSI Prestige 14 Evo vs. AdobeRGB (71%)
MSI Prestige 14 Evo vs. AdobeRGB (71%)

Ancak 14 inçlik ekran oyun oynamak için pek uygun değil. Sırasıyla 33 ms (siyahtan beyaza) ve 60 ms (griden griye) yanıt süreleriyle panel oldukça yavaş geçiş yapar.

Reflections (cloudy sky)
Reflections (cloudy sky)
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
59.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.4 ms rise
↘ 33.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Test koşulları

Önceden yüklenmiş MSI Center'da, çeşitli yazılım ve donanım özelliklerini değiştirme seçeneğiniz vardır. En ilginç olanı, dört profil içeren Kullanıcı Senaryosu menüsüdür. Aksi belirtilmedikçe, tüm ölçümlerimiz, kurulumdan sonra otomatik olarak etkinleştirilen Dengeli modda gerçekleştirildi.

MSI Center
MSI Center
MSI Center
MSI Center

Verim

1.000 Euro'nun (~ 1.214 $) üzerindeki fiyatı haklı çıkarmak ve yüksek mobilite sağlamak için MSI, güçlü enerji tasarrufu sağlayan bileşenlere başvurur. Yepyeni Tiger Lake işlemci burada özellikle belirtilmelidir; Birazdan daha ayrıntılı olarak göreceğimiz gibi şaşırtıcı derecede hızlı Iris Xe Graphics G7'ye sahip. 16 GB RAM, çoğu ticari müşteri için birkaç yıl boyunca yeterli olacaktır. 512 GB SSD teorik olarak daha büyük bir modelle değiştirilebilir.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark

İşlemci

Core i7-1185G7, hem performansa hem de pil ömrüne değer veren kullanıcılar için ideal bir arkadaştır. 28 watt'lık model, 12 MB L3 önbellek ve dört çekirdek sunar ve Hyper-Threading aracılığıyla sekiz adede kadar iş parçacığını paralel olarak işleyebilir. Önceki Comet Lake mimarisine kıyasla en büyük iyileştirmelerden biri, azaltılmış üretim sürecidir. AMD'nin 7 nm teknolojisini bir dereceye kadar yakalamak için Intel nihayet 14 nm'lik bir işlemi kullanmayı bıraktı ve bunun yerine en azından 10 nm'ye geçti.

055110165220275330385440495550605660715770825880935990Tooltip
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø892 (873.52-933.34)
MSI Prestige 14 Evo (High Performance Mode) Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø915 (896.44-994.51)
MSI Prestige 14 Evo (Silent Mode) Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø582 (575.36-665.78)
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø653 (629.83-862.05)
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Ryzen 7 4700U: Ø932 (907.83-1035.01)

Dört çekirdekli işlemcinin temel saat hızı 3.0 GHz'dir ve güç tasarrufu sağlayan bir CPU için oldukça fazla olan Turbo Boost ile 4.8 GHz'e kadar mümkündür. İşlemcinin yük altında nasıl davrandığını Cinebench Loop ile test ettik ve bu iki şeyi ortaya çıkardı. Birincisi: Sessiz mod, performansı önemli ölçüde azaltırken, MSI Merkezinde bulunan Yüksek Performans modu neredeyse hiç avantaj sağlamıyor. İkincisi: Core i7-1185G7, Ryzen 7 4700U (8C / 8T) ile kabaca eşleşebilir, ancak Intel çipinin Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U ve Ryzen 7 4800U'ya (her biri 8C / 16T) karşı şansı yoktur. genellikle benzer şekilde pahalı dizüstü bilgisayarlarda bulunur - en azından çok iş parçacıklı uygulamalarda.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Core i7-1185G7
224 Points
Average of class Office
  (82.6 - 284, n=118, last 2 years)
218 Points -3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
214 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
182 Points -19%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
182 Points -19%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
180 Points -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
1639 (1505.17min - 1639.01max) Points +76%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
1413 (1338.87min - 1412.98max) Points +51%
Average of class Office
  (160.8 - 2642, n=120, last 2 years)
1405 Points +51%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1035 Points +11%
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Core i7-1185G7
933 (873.52min - 933.34max) Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
810 (629.83min - 862.05max) Points -13%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
694 Seconds * -30%
Average of class Office
  (214 - 2844, n=121, last 2 years)
534 Seconds * -0%
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Core i7-1185G7
533 Seconds *
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
524 Seconds * +2%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
340 Seconds * +36%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
322 Seconds * +40%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5096 MIPS +1%
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5029 MIPS
Average of class Office
  (2233 - 6687, n=121, last 2 years)
5026 MIPS 0%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
4436 MIPS -12%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
4413 MIPS -12%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
4292 MIPS -15%
7z b 4
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
44804 MIPS +80%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
42173 MIPS +69%
Average of class Office
  (4226 - 62349, n=121, last 2 years)
34839 MIPS +40%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
26652 MIPS +7%
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Core i7-1185G7
24882 MIPS
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
21036 MIPS -15%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Core i7-1185G7
579 Points
Average of class Office
  (181.3 - 764, n=120, last 2 years)
562 Points -3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
543 Points -6%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
479 Points -17%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
474 Points -18%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
466 Points -20%
CPU (Multi Core)
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
3264 Points +43%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
3213 Points +41%
Average of class Office
  (356 - 5904, n=120, last 2 years)
3121 Points +37%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
2401 Points +5%
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Core i7-1185G7
2283 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1728 Points -24%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1523 Points +9%
Average of class Office
  (510 - 1974, n=122, last 2 years)
1480 Points +6%
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1398 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
1154 Points -17%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
1150 Points -18%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
1154 Points -17%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1101 Points -21%
Multi-Core
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
6950 Points +25%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
5798 Points +4%
Average of class Office
  (1018 - 11980, n=122, last 2 years)
6683 Points +20%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
6609 Points +19%
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5560 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5456 Points -2%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
4792 Points -14%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
10.77 fps +51%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
10.3 fps +45%
Average of class Office
  (1.55 - 17.4, n=120, last 2 years)
9.27 fps +30%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
7.81 fps +10%
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Core i7-1185G7
7.12 fps
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.34 fps -25%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
73.4 s * -31%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
59.8 s * -7%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
57.8 s * -3%
Average of class Office
  (31.3 - 117.5, n=120, last 2 years)
56.4 s * -1%
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Core i7-1185G7
56.1 s *
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
47.9 s * +15%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
0.629 sec * -6%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
0.613 sec * -4%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
0.61 sec * -3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.593 sec * -0%
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Core i7-1185G7
0.591 sec *
Average of class Office
  (0.4244 - 1.397, n=119, last 2 years)
0.586 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
933 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
98.1 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
224 Points
Yardım

Sistem performansı

Özellikle NVMe SSD sayesinde, Prestige 14 Evo çok iyi bir sistem performansına sahiptir. PCMark 10'daki 4.894 puan, bir multimedya veya oyun dizüstü bilgisayarından da gelebilir. Sübjektif bir bakış açısıyla, işletim sistemi (Windows 10 Home 64-bit) de, yükleme süreleri, aktarımlar, kurulumlar veya önyükleme işlemleri gibi hızlı yanıt verir.

PCMark 10 - Score
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
Vega 8, R7 4800U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5383 Points +10%
Average of class Office
  (2325 - 7157, n=105, last 2 years)
5348 Points +9%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
4983 Points +2%
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162
4894 Points
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
4886 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
4704 Points -4%
PCMark 10 Score
4894 puan
Yardım

DPC gecikmeleri

14 Evo, test alanında en düşük gecikme oranlarına sahip olmasına rağmen, LatencyMon aracına göre gerçek zamanlı ses ve video düzenleme için mutlaka uygun değildir.

Latencies
Latencies
Latencies
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
Vega 8, R7 4800U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
2164 μs * -231%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1087 μs * -66%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
1030 μs * -58%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
662 μs * -1%
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162
653 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Depolama

MSI, kurulu depolama aygıtı konusunda hiçbir taviz vermez. Phison'un 512 GB sürücüsü, CrystalDiskMark ve AS SSD testlerinde rakiplerin Samsung ve Intel SSD'lerini kısmen geride bırakıyor.

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-37%
-10%
-19%
-41%
Write 4K
248.4
132.3
-47%
146.1
-41%
111.4
-55%
98.8
-60%
Read 4K
56.4
51.7
-8%
47.18
-16%
58.2
3%
32.44
-42%
Write Seq
2513
1264
-50%
2896
15%
2195
-13%
1582
-37%
Read Seq
2250
1484
-34%
2754
22%
2516
12%
1471
-35%
Write 4K Q32T1
589
478.4
-19%
425.8
-28%
472.1
-20%
375.4
-36%
Read 4K Q32T1
696
366.9
-47%
514
-26%
380.5
-45%
491.9
-29%
Write Seq Q32T1
2515
1750
-30%
2989
19%
2339
-7%
1574
-37%
Read Seq Q32T1
4915
1970
-60%
3568
-27%
3565
-27%
2329
-53%
AS SSD
-87%
-39%
-63%
-64%
Seq Read
3760
1219
-68%
1658
-56%
1976
-47%
1960
-48%
Seq Write
2335
947
-59%
2464
6%
1389
-41%
1547
-34%
4K Read
66.8
50.9
-24%
59.5
-11%
50.7
-24%
31.56
-53%
4K Write
184.3
150.9
-18%
128.6
-30%
105.5
-43%
116.6
-37%
4K-64 Read
1801
587
-67%
1576
-12%
853
-53%
454.7
-75%
4K-64 Write
1754
862
-51%
1986
13%
1970
12%
262.1
-85%
Access Time Read *
0.135
0.083
39%
0.049
64%
0.058
57%
Access Time Write *
0.018
0.114
-533%
0.087
-383%
0.104
-478%
0.034
-89%
Score Read
2244
760
-66%
1802
-20%
1101
-51%
682
-70%
Score Write
2172
1108
-49%
2361
9%
2214
2%
533
-75%
Score Total
5500
2260
-59%
5133
-7%
3862
-30%
1552
-72%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-62% / -66%
-25% / -27%
-41% / -45%
-53% / -54%

* ... smaller is better

Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4915 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2515 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 696 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 589 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2250 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2513 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 56.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 248.4 MB/s

Graphics card

The Xe Graphics G7 GPU that's integrated into the processor is responsible for graphics calculations. The DirectX 12 capable chip has 96 execution units and clocks at 400 to 1,350 MHz.

3DMark 11 Performance
7522 puan
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
101457 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
20821 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5332 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score
1859 puan
Yardım

As the graphics benchmarks prove, performance is surprisingly good for an iGPU and especially for Intel standards. Both in 3DMark 11 and in the current 3DMark, the 14 Evo comes out on top of the comparison field. AMD's Vega 7 is outperformed by at least 20% in each case (maximum lead: Almost 90%), and a Vega 8 performs at least 10% slower. Even the Asus ZenBook 14, which is also equipped with an Iris Xe G7, has to admit some defeat.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
7090 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
6563 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
6085 Points -14%
Average of class Office
  (1474 - 13132, n=113, last 2 years)
6062 Points -14%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
5331 Points -25%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
4990 Points -30%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
30676 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
27289 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
27160 Points -11%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
24301 Points -21%
Average of class Office
  (5681 - 58068, n=93, last 2 years)
24010 Points -22%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
22895 Points -25%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
5848 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
5139 Points -12%
Average of class Office
  (712 - 9228, n=114, last 2 years)
4191 Points -28%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
3938 Points -33%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
3521 Points -40%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
3134 Points -46%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
1670 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
1401 Points -16%
Average of class Office
  (242 - 3242, n=110, last 2 years)
1372 Points -18%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
1173 Points -30%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
1063 Points -36%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
973 Points -42%

We tested whether the graphics performance remains constant over prolonged periods of time with the role-playing game The Witcher 3 for a good 60 minutes (Full HD, maximum details). No frame-rate drops could be observed here.

051015Tooltip
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162: Ø15.4 (12-17)

Gaming performance

Although the 14 Evo would definitely be gaming-capable, the 14-incher is definitely not a gaming platform. For one thing, performance is often only sufficient for minimum settings and 1280x720 pixels in modern games. On the other hand, many games generally don't run smoothly - probably due to driver problems. We had to deal with crashes (Cyberpunk 2077Horizon Zero DawnDirt 5Assassin's Creed ValhallaCall of Duty Cold War) and/or massive graphics errors (Ghost Recon BreakpointWatch Dogs Legion) in some cases. On the other hand, older or less demanding games, such as Dota 2 and Fifa 21, can be enjoyed with good visuals and at the native resolution.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7
33.4 (18min) fps
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7
25.4 (22min - 29max) fps -24%
Average of class Office
  (3.49 - 59.1, n=104, last 2 years)
25.2 fps -25%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
Vega 8, R7 4800U
23.1 fps -31%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U
22.3 (20min - 24max) fps -33%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U
16.5 fps -51%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7
16 (12min) fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
Vega 8, R7 4800U
14.9 fps -7%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U
14.4 (13min - 17max) fps -10%
Average of class Office
  (2.66 - 34, n=110, last 2 years)
13.8 fps -14%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7
11.9 (9min - 14max) fps -26%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U
10.7 fps -33%
düşük orta yüksek ultra
GTA V (2015) 96.4 87.8 31.9 12.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 96.4 64.7 33.4 16
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 83.2 76.4 54.3 51.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 50.5 37 32.4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 63 24 22 0
Battlefield V (2018) 83.9 42.5 36.8 29.9
Borderlands 3 (2019) 50.3 26.4 15.9 12.1
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 46 severe graphical problems 36 severe graphical problems 32 severe graphical problems 23 severe graphical problems
Valorant (2020) 171 124 112
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start
Crysis Remastered (2020) 58.3 19.5 11.7 8.99
FIFA 21 (2020) 190 90.3 84.3 60.9
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 46 severe graphical problems 27 severe graphical problems 0 severe graphical problems 0 severe graphical problems
Dirt 5 (2020) 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War (2020) 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) 43.4 24.4 23.3 20.2
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020) 39 26 23 21
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start
Hitman 3 (2021) 85 39
Outriders (2021) 49.9 29.9 26.2 26.2
Resident Evil Village (2021) 53.4 24.9 23.2 21.4
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) 63.8 0 ()
Days Gone (2021) 31.9 23.4 21 16.5
Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021) 79.6 56.6 50.1
F1 2021 (2021) 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start
Deathloop (2021) 0 game wont start
New World (2021) 35.2 23.6 20.9 17.1
Alan Wake Remastered (2021) 53.1 42.2
Far Cry 6 (2021) 0 game wont start (crash) 0 game wont start (crash) 0 game wont start (crash) 0 game wont start (crash)
Back 4 Blood (2021) 49.1 39.1 35 33.7
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start
Riders Republic (2021) 33 22 18 16
Call of Duty Vanguard (2021) 0 severe graphical problems
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) 49 0 ()
Battlefield 2042 (2021) 0 game wont start (crash)
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) 103 0 () 0 () 0 ()
Halo Infinite (2021) 0 game wont start (no GPU support)

Emissions

Noise emissions

Although the 14 Evo gets louder than its rivals under load, the noise level in 3D mode is acceptable at 39 to 43 dB(A). The case fan is completely silent in idle usage - apart from intermittent spikes. However, the device is never completely silent. In this way, our test device exhibited a quite prominent coil whine. Depending on your sense of hearing and your personal perception, this noise can become annoying.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.137.441.439.33838.92529.131.832.334.534.438.33141.542.840.44340.8474026.73326.327.629.335.25022.64524.628.526.129.76326.827.13524.525.1318034.526.328.818.321.237.410022.829.221.716.318.224.212522.928.418.619.618.526.51602826.117.519.618.428.620025.921.52020.320.427.525026.624.53817.617.627.531531.218.226.414.414.830.940024.713.319.812.312.225.250026.212.221.911.81126.963030.711.927.411.410.630.4800311128.511.110.431.7100030.9112811.611.431.1125032.911.429.211.710.832.5160031.611.227.8121131.8200032.311.828.811.710.932.525003212.528.712.411.832315031.513.428.212.912.131.3400033.116.127.514.912.432.6500030.314.224.712.912.730.263002715.121.613.312.927800021.41617.814.612.821.21000017.114.21513.212.717.11250014.814.414.512.812.314.41600017.616.816.41311.915.7SPL42.826.939.525.224.342.8N4.20.93.30.70.64.2median 28median 14.2median 24.7median 12.9median 12.3median 28.6Delta4.24.14.52.224.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta
25 / 27 / 39 dB
Çalışırken
43 / 43 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
sessiz
40 dB(A)
duyulabilirlik
50 dB(A)
gürültülü
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm uzaklık)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
R7 4800U, Vega 8
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
R7 4700U, Vega 7
Average of class Office
 
Noise
-2%
10%
-1%
-0%
11%
off / environment *
24
29.8
-24%
26.3
-10%
30
-25%
31.2
-30%
Idle Minimum *
25
29.9
-20%
26.5
-6%
30.6
-22%
31.2
-25%
Idle Average *
27
31
-15%
26.5
2%
30.6
-13%
31.2
-16%
Idle Maximum *
39
31
21%
26.5
32%
30.6
22%
31.2
20%
Load Average *
43
35.6
17%
31.8
26%
33.6
22%
33.8
21%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39
37.4
4%
35.9
8%
36.3
7%
Load Maximum *
43
40.8
5%
35.9
17%
39.2
9%
33.5
22%

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

The 14 Evo also surpasses the comparison field in terms of heat development. The highest graphics performance also leads to the highest temperatures in 3D mode. In view of a maximum bottom temperature of 61 °C (~142 °F), the 14-inch laptop shouldn't necessarily be placed on the lap under full load. A maximum of 54 °C (~129 °F) in our The Witcher 3 test is also quite a lot. However, most users will probably only rarely put their business laptop under such load. The case surfaces stay fairly cool under normal conditions. We couldn't measure more than 30 °C (~86 °F) on the chassis in idle usage.

The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
Stress test
Stress test
Full load - Top
Full load - Top
Full load - Bottom
Full load - Bottom
Maksimum yük
 50 °C49 °C50 °C 
 46 °C46 °C39 °C 
 41 °C37 °C34 °C 
Maksimum: 50 °C
Ortalama: 43.6 °C
54 °C57 °C61 °C
44 °C53 °C52 °C
37 °C41 °C42 °C
Maksimum: 61 °C
Ortalama: 49 °C
Güç kaynağı  48 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-13.3 °C / -23.9 F).
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
R7 4800U, Vega 8
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
R7 4700U, Vega 7
Average of class Office
 
Heat
11%
14%
13%
16%
11%
Maximum Upper Side *
50
41
18%
43.8
12%
43.6
13%
39.5
21%
Maximum Bottom *
61
44.4
27%
43
30%
52.6
14%
43.6
29%
Idle Upper Side *
28
28
-0%
24.8
11%
22.4
20%
25.9
7%
Idle Bottom *
29
29.8
-3%
28.6
1%
27.2
6%
26.6
8%

* ... smaller is better

Speakers

Unfortunately, the sound quality doesn't live up to the purchase price. According to our audio analysis, the bass and the mids are particularly lacking. The maximum volume of 75 dB is also modest. The competing ZenBook 14 performs better almost across all frequency ranges and can be turned up higher (up to 87 dB). To enjoy media content, headphones or external speakers should be plugged into the 14 Evo.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038392534.439.23140.848.74029.3345026.128.16325.1298021.224.410018.220.712518.525.216018.426.820020.428.825017.636.731514.841.840012.246.15001150.163010.654.780010.462.4100011.468.8125010.869.616001165.2200010.960.6250011.860.1315012.154.3400012.452.7500012.757630012.959.8800012.856.91000012.7561250012.351.31600011.951.2SPL24.374.8N0.629.5median 12.3median 54.3Delta210.142.544.642.534.436.134.431.331.431.330.43030.43331.33330.332.330.330.831.230.831.129.931.138.22938.25127.9515826.95865.325.265.369.828.569.873.824.873.878.721.378.778.518.678.577.71777.780.616.780.679.716.879.77816.8787416.37472.516.872.566.817.866.86921.36972.416.572.470.714.470.764.413.864.457.81457.861.314.261.360.615.960.687.53187.571.81.571.8median 70.7median 17median 70.77.44.87.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energy management

Energy consumption

Even though the competition needs a bit less power, we would describe energy consumption as decent. 5 to 11 watts in idle usage speak for good battery life. Under load, our measuring device displayed between 39 and 65 watts.

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.6 / 1.1 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 5 / 7 / 11 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 54 / 65 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
R7 4800U, Vega 8
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
R7 4700U, Vega 7
Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
21%
9%
30%
28%
12%
Idle Minimum *
5
4.8
4%
4
20%
2.6
48%
2.8
44%
Idle Average *
7
6.5
7%
6.3
10%
5
29%
4.8
31%
Idle Maximum *
11
7.7
30%
7.7
30%
5.6
49%
6.7
39%
Load Average *
54
29.6
45%
48.3
11%
39.8
26%
28
48%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39
28.6
27%
49
-26%
37.1
5%
57
-46%
Load Maximum *
65
57.8
11%
57.6
11%
49.9
23%
31
52%

* ... smaller is better

Battery life

The battery capacity of 52 Wh is in the range of the competition, which has 48 to 67 Wh. The 14 Evo's runtime is more than solid in practical scenarios. In our Wi-Fi test with reduced display brightness (approx. 150 cd/m²), the 14-incher shut down after about 7.5 hours. However, the comparison devices do even better: They achieve between 10 and 13 hours in the WLAN test. Only in an ideal case (low load and low brightness) is it possible to squeeze more than 10 hours out from the MSI laptop's battery.

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
13h 45min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 31min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
1h 08min
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52.4 Wh
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 67 Wh
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE
R7 4800U, Vega 8, 61 Wh
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, 53 Wh
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
R7 4700U, Vega 7, 48.85 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
116%
50%
76%
65%
60%
Reader / Idle
825
1554
88%
1623
97%
1392
69%
WiFi v1.3
451
786
74%
619
37%
795
76%
715
59%
Load
68
194
185%
79
16%
114
68%
H.264
968

Artılar

+ iyi pil ömrü
+ küçük boyutlu
+ kompakt güç adaptörü
+ rahatça hafif
+ şık tasarım
+ Thunderbolt 4

Eksiler

- zayıf web kamerası
- çok fazla bağlantı noktası yok
- zayıf ses
- lehimli RAM
- bobin sesi

Verdict

MSI Prestige 14 Evo, review device provided by MSI Germany.
MSI Prestige 14 Evo, review device provided by MSI Germany.

With the Tiger Lake generation, Intel is trying to close the performance gap to AMD, which was long overdue.

However, the plan has only been partially successful. While graphics performance makes a big leap forward in the case of the Core i7-1185G7 (Iris Xe Graphics G7), the relationship between the processor performance and the cost is still better with AMD. In the corresponding price range, the main competitor already offers octa-core processors with 16 threads instead of quad-core ones with eight threads, which rewards certain applications with a significantly higher performance. In addition, the AMD models are more energy-efficient (lower heat development, higher battery life).

MSI has successfully created a nice all-rounder for on-the-go use here.

Otherwise, MSI has focused more on the mobility aspect than on the professional aspect. The port range and maintenance/upgrade options (soldered RAM) fall victim to the compact and light case. The quality of the webcam and the speakers could also be criticized. In return, the Prestige 14 Evo scores points with a stylish design and a large touchpad, among other things.

Price and availability

The MSI Prestige 14 Evo is currently available in the A11M-005 configuration (i7-1185G7, Iris Xe, 16 GB of RAM, 512 GB SSD) for around 1,300 Euros (~$1,580) at Notebooksbilliger.de and Amazon.de, among others.

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 - 12/09/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

İşcilik
81 / 98 → 83%
Klavye
79%
Mouse
89%
Bağlanılabilirlik
63 / 80 → 78%
Ağırlık
73 / 20-75 → 96%
Batarya
77%
Görüntü
87%
Oyun performansı
70 / 78 → 90%
Uygulama performansı
93 / 95 → 98%
Isınma
77%
Ses
79%
Audio
61%
Camera
39 / 85 → 46%
Ortalama
74%
83%
Office - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > MSI Prestige 14 Evo dizüstü bilgisayar incelemesi: Intel yetişiyor
Florian Glaser, 2021-01- 1 (Update: 2021-03-12)