Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Akıllı Telefon İncelemesi - Biraz Daha

Name: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Brand: Xiaomi

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, 01/28/2020

One of the best smartphone cameras? Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro sadece Mi Note 10'dan daha fazla bellek sunmakla kalmıyor, aynı zamanda ana kamera için ekstra bir lens sunuyor. Minimum yükseltme gibi görünen şey, daha parlak ve daha iyi kamera görüntüleri sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bunun testte işe yarayıp yaramadığını göreceğiz.

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Comparison Devices

Bewertung	Rating Version	Datum	Modell	Gewicht	Laufwerk	Groesse	Aufloesung
84%	7	01/2020	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro 730G, Adreno 618	208 g	256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.47"	2340x1080
83%	7	12/2019	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 730G, Adreno 618	208 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.47"	2340x1080
86%	7	10/2019	OnePlus 7T 855+, Adreno 640	190 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
84%	7	10/2019	Samsung Galaxy A90 5G 855, Adreno 640	206 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.7"	2400x1080
86%	7	05/2019	Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 855, Adreno 640	190 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.4"	2340x1080

Top 10
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebook listesi
» Top 10 oyun notebooku
» Top 10 bütçeye uygun Ofis/İş Notebook Listesi
» Top 10 Premium Ofis/İş notebookları
» Top 10 Çalışma istasyonu laptopları
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» Top 10 Ultrabooklar
» En iyi 10 dönüştürülebilir modeli
» Seçimi en iyi 10 tablet
» Notebookcheck Top 10 Windows Tabletleri
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından incelenen en iyi Notebook ekranları
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından seçilen 300 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 akıllı telefon listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 hafif oyun notebookları

Boyut Karşılaştırma

Samsung Galaxy A90 5G OnePlus 7T Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Xiaomi Mi Note 10

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	513 (min: 457, max: 532) MBit/s ∼100% +56%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	447 (min: 201, max: 659) MBit/s ∼87% +36%
OnePlus 7T 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	430 (min: 374, max: 485) MBit/s ∼84% +31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	331 (min: 317, max: 341) MBit/s ∼65% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	329 (min: 284, max: 350) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	523 (min: 410, max: 563) MBit/s ∼100% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	501 (min: 479, max: 554) MBit/s ∼96% +60%
OnePlus 7T 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	422 (min: 238, max: 447) MBit/s ∼81% +35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	327 (min: 321, max: 333) MBit/s ∼63% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	313 (min: 306, max: 319) MBit/s ∼60%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (284-350)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø313 (306-319)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

21.7 ∆E

22.5 ∆E

25.5 ∆E

21.5 ∆E

24.9 ∆E

8.1 ∆E

21.4 ∆E

21.3 ∆E

18.1 ∆E

22.7 ∆E

7.7 ∆E

16.1 ∆E

12.6 ∆E

22.2 ∆E

11.2 ∆E

9.8 ∆E

12.4 ∆E

26.6 ∆E

38.3 ∆E

17.6 ∆E

28.9 ∆E

29.4 ∆E

24.4 ∆E

13.9 ∆E

ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro: 19.94 ∆E min: 7.7 - max: 38.29 ∆E

5.4 ∆E

3.3 ∆E

7.6 ∆E

8.4 ∆E

4.6 ∆E

2.8 ∆E

2.4 ∆E

5.5 ∆E

4.2 ∆E

5.6 ∆E

5.3 ∆E

2.3 ∆E

7.5 ∆E

7.4 ∆E

3.8 ∆E

2.2 ∆E

4.2 ∆E

7.4 ∆E

8.5 ∆E

3 ∆E

3.4 ∆E

3.7 ∆E

3.3 ∆E

6.9 ∆E

ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro: 4.95 ∆E min: 2.19 - max: 8.52 ∆E


554 cd/m²	582 cd/m²	609 cd/m²
547 cd/m²	579 cd/m²	592 cd/m²
539 cd/m²	589 cd/m²	589 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 609 cd/m² Ortalama: 575.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.57 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 89 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 579 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Siyah: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.61 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.244

	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47	OnePlus 7T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55	Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7	Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL IPS, 2340x1080, 6.4
Response Times		9%	47%	12%	129%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	8 (3, 5)	10 (5, 5) -25%	6 (3, 3) 25%	10 (5, 5) -25%	44 (21.2, 22.8) -450%
Response Time Black / White *	24 (19, 5)	8 (5, 3) 67%	6 (3, 3) 75%	6 (3, 3) 75%	25.6 (12.4, 13.2) -7%
PWM Frequency	255	215.5 -15%	357 40%	223 -13%	2404 (58) 843%
Screen		5%	20%	-13%	1%
Brightness middle	579	625 8%	693 20%	581 0%	569 -2%
Brightness	576	607 5%	703 22%	581 1%	537 -7%
Brightness Distribution	89	89 0%	96 8%	94 6%	79 -11%
Black Level *					0.31
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	4.61	4.38 5%	3.42 26%	5.44 -18%	3.5 24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	7.72	6.83 12%	6.12 21%	13.05 -69%	6 22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	4.2	4.1 2%	3.3 21%	4 5%	5.1 -21%
Gamma	2.244 ^98%	2.251 ^98%	2.265 ^97%	2.118 ^104%	2.36 ^93%
CCT	7201 ^90%	7251 ^90%	6799 ^96%	5882 ^111%	6827 ^95%
Contrast					1835
Total Average (Program / Settings)		7% / 7%	34% / 29%	-1% / -4%	65% / 43%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

255 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 255 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 255 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13658 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench

Geekbench 5
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	1729 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1723 Points ∼63% 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	2753 Points ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2733 Points ∼99% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1723 - 1729, n=2)	1726 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (807 - 3575, n=62)	1858 Points ∼67% +7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	543 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	543 Points ∼69% 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	783 Points ∼100% +44%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	740 Points ∼95% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (543 - 543, n=2)	543 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 1344, n=62)	530 Points ∼68% -2%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	7551 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	7558 Points ∼74% 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8702 Points ∼85% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10251 Points ∼100% +36%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9814 Points ∼96% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (7551 - 7558, n=2)	7555 Points ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 11690, n=422)	5427 Points ∼53% -28%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	9240 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	9052 Points ∼69% -2%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10286 Points ∼79% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	12747 Points ∼98% +38%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	13047 Points ∼100% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (9052 - 9240, n=2)	9146 Points ∼70% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 15193, n=585)	5898 Points ∼45% -36%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3202 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3188 Points ∼69% 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4635 Points ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4576 Points ∼99% +43%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2840 Points ∼61% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3188 - 3202, n=2)	3195 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 5576, n=428)	2011 Points ∼43% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2492 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2425 Points ∼30% -3%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7977 Points ∼100% +220%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6990 Points ∼88% +180%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7069 Points ∼89% +184%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2425 - 2492, n=2)	2459 Points ∼31% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 8374, n=428)	1808 Points ∼23% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2567 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2561 Points ∼37% 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6875 Points ∼100% +168%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6257 Points ∼91% +144%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5311 Points ∼77% +107%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2561 - 2567, n=2)	2564 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 6916, n=429)	1685 Points ∼25% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3155 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3193 Points ∼68% +1%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4517 Points ∼96% +43%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4119 Points ∼88% +31%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4703 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3155 - 3193, n=2)	3174 Points ∼67% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 5133, n=458)	1922 Points ∼41% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3648 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3646 Points ∼32% 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	11433 Points ∼100% +213%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10024 Points ∼88% +175%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10290 Points ∼90% +182%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3646 - 3648, n=2)	3647 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 20154, n=458)	2411 Points ∼21% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3522 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3535 Points ∼41% 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8531 Points ∼100% +142%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7602 Points ∼89% +116%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8141 Points ∼95% +131%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3522 - 3535, n=2)	3529 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 10427, n=458)	2037 Points ∼24% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3202 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3171 Points ∼71% -1%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4492 Points ∼100% +40%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4374 Points ∼97% +37%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4320 Points ∼96% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3171 - 3202, n=2)	3187 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 4909, n=508)	1919 Points ∼43% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2245 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2237 Points ∼31% 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7150 Points ∼100% +218%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6231 Points ∼87% +178%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6336 Points ∼89% +182%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2237 - 2245, n=2)	2241 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 7150, n=508)	1506 Points ∼21% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2405 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2394 Points ∼38% 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6319 Points ∼100% +163%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5694 Points ∼90% +137%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5705 Points ∼90% +137%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2394 - 2405, n=2)	2400 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 6319, n=509)	1453 Points ∼23% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3228 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3191 Points ∼72% -1%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4377 Points ∼98% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4231 Points ∼95% +31%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4454 Points ∼100% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3191 - 3228, n=2)	3210 Points ∼72% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 4900, n=550)	1786 Points ∼40% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3485 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3498 Points ∼32% 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10781 Points ∼100% +209%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9703 Points ∼90% +178%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9973 Points ∼93% +186%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3485 - 3498, n=2)	3492 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 11302, n=549)	1981 Points ∼18% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3424 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3425 Points ∼42% 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8136 Points ∼100% +138%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7537 Points ∼93% +120%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7820 Points ∼96% +128%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3424 - 3425, n=2)	3425 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8338, n=552)	1717 Points ∼21% -50%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	10 fps ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10 fps ∼37% 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	27 fps ∼100% +170%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps ∼89% +140%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps ∼89% +140%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (10 - 10, n=2)	10 fps ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=220)	9.84 fps ∼36% -2%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	6.7 fps ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10 fps ∼56% +49%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	18 fps ∼100% +169%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps ∼89% +139%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps ∼89% +139%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (6.7 - 10, n=2)	8.35 fps ∼46% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 33, n=218)	6.83 fps ∼38% +2%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	16 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps ∼39% 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	41 fps ∼100% +156%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps ∼90% +131%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	36 fps ∼88% +125%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16 - 16, n=2)	16 fps ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=224)	14.6 fps ∼36% -9%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	18 fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps ∼38% 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	47 fps ∼100% +161%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps ∼87% +128%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps ∼89% +133%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (18 - 18, n=2)	18 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 87, n=224)	16.2 fps ∼34% -10%

	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro	Xiaomi Mi Note 10	OnePlus 7T	Samsung Galaxy A90 5G	Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL	Average 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		4%	40%	114%	35%	0%	-57%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard				59.4 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)	62.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		49.9 (1.7 - 87.1, n=458)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard				75.1 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)	87.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		68.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=458)
Random Write 4KB	108.5	118.9 10%	29.9 -72%	168.5 55%	160.18 48%	109 0%	24.5 (0.14 - 259, n=787) -77%
Random Read 4KB	119.2	106.2 -11%	170.1 43%	190.5 60%	153.29 29%	119 0%	49.8 (1.59 - 226, n=787) -58%
Sequential Write 256KB	205.1	243.6 19%	218.4 6%	522.3 155%	195.6 -5%	205 0%	102 (2.99 - 590, n=787) -50%
Sequential Read 256KB	499.2	480.5 -4%	1406 182%	1418.4 184%	831.4 67%	499 0%	285 (12.1 - 1781, n=787) -43%

Maksimum yük

Bekleme


37.5 °C	39.8 °C	39.3 °C
37.2 °C	38.6 °C	37.6 °C
37.1 °C	38.3 °C	36.9 °C

Maksimum: 39.8 °C
Ortalama: 38 °C


36.7 °C	38.7 °C	39.6 °C
36.4 °C	36.7 °C	36.9 °C
36.2 °C	37.4 °C	36.8 °C

Maksimum: 39.6 °C
Ortalama: 37.3 °C

Güç kaynağı 40 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro 5260 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh	OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A90 5G 4500 mAh	Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 5000 mAh	Average of class Smartphone
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3	1112	1127 1%	896 -19%	946 -15%	801 -28%	669 (223 - 2636, n=652) -40%

Batarya ömrü


NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		18h 32min

Artılar

+ great terms

+ color accurate screen with HDR

+ a lot of memory

+ little warming

Eksiler

- only 12 months warranty

- comparatively low system performance for the price

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro - 2020-01-2201/22/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

İşcilik

86%

Klavye

69 / 75 → 92%

Mouse

96%

Bağlanılabilirlik

49 / 70 → 70%

Ağırlık

88%

Batarya

92%

Görüntü

85%

Oyun performansı

31 / 64 → 48%

Uygulama performansı

72 / 86 → 84%

Isınma

90%

Ses

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

75%

Ortalama

78%

84%

Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık

Linked Articles

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro (Mi Note Seri)

İnceleme

•

İnceleme: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 - ...

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Akıllı Telefon İncelemesi - Biraz Daha

Comparison Devices

Boyut Karşılaştırma

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis

Artılar

Eksiler

Linked Articles

Pricecompare