Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro Akıllı Telefon İncelemesi - Biraz Daha
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm, Videos @1080p/30fps
Comparison Devices
Bewertung | Rating Version | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84 % | 7 | 01/2020 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 208 g | 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.47" | 2340x1080 | |
83 % | 7 | 12/2019 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 208 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.47" | 2340x1080 | |
86 % | 7 | 10/2019 | OnePlus 7T SD 855+, Adreno 640 | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 | |
84 % | 7 | 10/2019 | Samsung Galaxy A90 5G SD 855, Adreno 640 | 206 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
86 % | 7 | 05/2019 | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL SD 855, Adreno 640 | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2340x1080 |
Top 10
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebook listesi
» Top 10 oyun notebooku
» Top 10 bütçeye uygun Ofis/İş Notebook Listesi
» Top 10 Premium Ofis/İş notebookları
» Top 10 Çalışma istasyonu laptopları
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» Top 10 Ultrabooklar
» En iyi 10 dönüştürülebilir modeli
» Seçimi en iyi 10 tablet
» Notebookcheck Top 10 Windows Tabletleri
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından incelenen en iyi Notebook ekranları
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından seçilen 300 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 akıllı telefon listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 hafif oyun notebookları
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
OnePlus 7T | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G | |
OnePlus 7T | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro |


|
Aydınlatma: 89 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 579 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Siyah: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.61 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.244
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47 | OnePlus 7T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55 | Samsung Galaxy A90 5G Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70 | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL IPS, 2340x1080, 6.40 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 9% | 47% | 12% | 129% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 8 (3, 5) | 10 (5, 5) -25% | 6 (3, 3) 25% | 10 (5, 5) -25% | 44 (21.2, 22.8) -450% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24 (19, 5) | 8 (5, 3) 67% | 6 (3, 3) 75% | 6 (3, 3) 75% | 25.6 (12.4, 13.2) -7% |
PWM Frequency | 255 | 215.5 -15% | 357 40% | 223 -13% | 2404 (58) 843% |
Screen | 5% | 20% | -13% | 1% | |
Brightness middle | 579 | 625 8% | 693 20% | 581 0% | 569 -2% |
Brightness | 576 | 607 5% | 703 22% | 581 1% | 537 -7% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 89 0% | 96 8% | 94 6% | 79 -11% |
Black Level * | 0.31 | ||||
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.61 | 4.38 5% | 3.42 26% | 5.44 -18% | 3.5 24% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 7.72 | 6.83 12% | 6.12 21% | 13.05 -69% | 6 22% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 4.2 | 4.1 2% | 3.3 21% | 4 5% | 5.1 -21% |
Gamma | 2.244 98% | 2.251 98% | 2.265 97% | 2.118 104% | 2.36 93% |
CCT | 7201 90% | 7251 90% | 6799 96% | 5882 111% | 6827 95% |
Contrast | 1835 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
7% | 34% /
29% | -1% /
-4% | 65% /
43% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 255 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 255 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 255 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9704 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured. |
Geekbench 5.0 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
OnePlus 7T | |
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1723 - 1729, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (807 - 3575, n=50, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
OnePlus 7T | |
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (543 - 543, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 1344, n=50, last 2 years) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
OnePlus 7T | |
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (7134 - 8683, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=279, last 2 years) | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
OnePlus 7T | |
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (8941 - 10200, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2689 - 19989, n=257, last 2 years) |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | OnePlus 7T | Samsung Galaxy A90 5G | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | Average 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 4% | 40% | 114% | 35% | -8% | 18% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 59.4 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501) | 62.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 53.5 | 59 (1.7 - 83.3, n=207, last 2 years) | |||
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 75.1 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501) | 87.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 74.5 | 76.9 (13.4 - 154, n=207, last 2 years) | |||
Random Write 4KB | 108.5 | 118.9 10% | 29.9 -72% | 168.5 55% | 160.18 48% | 65.3 (22 - 109, n=2) -40% | 100 (4.31 - 319, n=287, last 2 years) -8% |
Random Read 4KB | 119.2 | 106.2 -11% | 170.1 43% | 190.5 60% | 153.29 29% | 132 (119 - 144, n=2) 11% | 121 (13.5 - 325, n=287, last 2 years) 2% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 205.1 | 243.6 19% | 218.4 6% | 522.3 155% | 195.6 -5% | 203 (202 - 205, n=2) -1% | 285 (11.9 - 1321, n=287, last 2 years) 39% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 499.2 | 480.5 -4% | 1406 182% | 1418.4 184% | 831.4 67% | 484 (469 - 499, n=2) -3% | 682 (41.9 - 2037, n=287, last 2 years) 37% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro 5260 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh | OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A90 5G 4500 mAh | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 5000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||||
WiFi Websurfing 1.3 | 1112 | 1127 1% | 896 -19% | 946 -15% | 801 -28% | 874 (425 - 2000, n=293, last 2 years) -21% |
Artılar
Eksiler
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro - 01/22/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt