Acer Swift 5 Laptop İnceleme: 14 inç ultrabook için çok yönlü bir iyileştirme

Name: Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U
Brand: Acer

Its weight in dollars. Başka bir Swift sineklik testi için geldi ve selefinden çok daha az uzlaşma gerektirdiğini kanıtlamak zorunda kalacak. Yeni Intel Core i5-1035G1 nihayet aşırı azaltma yerine uygun performansı sunacak mı? İncelememizde öğrenin.

Christian Hintze, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Published 01/28/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Laptop / Notebook Windows

Yeni 14 inç Swift 5, test serilerimizde adım adım ilerledi. İçeride, yeni bir işlemci ve biraz daha güçlü bir grafik birimi ile donatılmış - selefi, aşırı kısma nedeniyle eleştirildi, bu da rekabeti bir yana kendi selefine ayak uydurmasını engelledi. Üretici aynı zamanda başka eleştiriler de dikkate almış görünüyor. Örneğin, Acer şimdi cihaza daha büyük bir pil verdi. Swift dışarıdan çok benzer görünüyor - gerçek değişiklikler ayrıntılarda. Selefine benzer şekilde, yeni Swift 1 kg'dan daha hafiftir ve bu da rekabetin çoğunu yener. Test ünitemizi selefi Acer Swift 7 ile iki kat fiyatla karşılaştıracağız ve Acer TravelMate X514 ile LG Gram ve Asus ZenBook 14.

Test device courtesy of Acer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U (Swift 5 SF514 Seri)

İşlemci

Intel Core i5-1035G1 4 x 1.2 GHz, Ice Lake-U

Grafik kartı

Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) - 1024 MB VRAM, Bellek: 1330 MHz, 26.20.100.7372

Bellek

8 GB

, LPDDR4

Görüntü

14.00 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Yes, AU Optronics AUO253D, IPS, CineCrystal, parlak: hayır

Anakart

Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)

Harddisk

Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1, 512 GB

, 480 GB Boş

Ses kartı

Intel Ice Lake-U/Y PCH-LP cAVS

Bağlantılar

1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: 3.5.mm audio jack, Kart okuyucular: none, 1 Parmak izi okuyucu

Network

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.0

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 14.95 x 318.7 x 210.5

Batarya

56 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4 cells, Batarya kullanım süresi (üreticiye göre): 12 h

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

İşletim sistemi

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD webcam 720p
Primary Camera: 1 MPix

Ek özellikler

Hoparlörler: Stereo, Klavye: chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, 24 Ay Garanti, 2 year warranty (1st Y ITW)

Ağırlık

943 g, Güç kaynağı: 275 g

Fiyat

900 Euro

Bağlantılar

Acer anasayfa
Acer notebook kısmı

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.3 %	01/2020	Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	943 g	14.95 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
84.3 %		Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620	930 g	15 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
84.2 %	11/2019	Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615	890 g	9.95 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
83.9 %		Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620	980 g	15 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
84.8 %	03/2019	Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620	1.2 kg	15.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
85 %	07/2018	LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620	994 g	15.2 mm	14.00"	1920x1080

Kasa - Acer ultrabook'un ayrıntılarındaki değişiklikler

İlk bakışta, son Swift 5 ve mevcut test ünitesi arasında herhangi bir görsel fark yok gibi görünüyor. Ancak, daha yakından bakarsanız, ayrıntılarda bazı değişiklikler göreceksiniz - ve bu iyi. Sonuçta, ekran çerçevesindeki boşluk boyutlarını ve selefte kötü konumlandırılmış bağlantı noktalarını eleştirdik.Önceki şimdi ele alındı - panel çerçevesine sıkıca oturuyor ve herhangi bir boşluk fark etmedik - işçilik görünüyor daha kaliteli olmak. Menteşeler de değişti, ancak yenileri cihazın artık 180 dereceye açılamayacağı gibi küçük bir dezavantaja sahip. Çerçeveler şimdi daha da ince ve selefinin endişe verici gıcırtıları ele alındı. Durum sağlam ve istikrarlı görünüyor. Bataryaya dışarıdan erişilemez ve alt kapağa torx vidaları ile sabitlenir.

"Eski" Swift 5 ile karşılaştırıldığında, yeni model daha da küçüldü - rekor kıran Swift 7'nin boyutuna ulaşmasa da, rekabet eksikliği nedeniyle (LG Gram hariç), Swift 5 bir olmaya devam ediyor aktif soğutma fanı bulunan en küçük ve özellikle en hafif 14 inç ultrabook'lardan.

Boyut Karşılaştırma

Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR DIN A4 ❌

Bağlantı - daha iyi bağlantı noktası konumlandırma özelliğine sahip cimri Swift

Eksik port seçimi aynı kalır. Bunun yerine Acer, kötü liman konumlandırma konusunu ele aldı. Selefte, hemen hemen tüm bağlantı noktaları sağ tarafa yerleştirildi ve bu nedenle fare kullanan sağ elini kullananlar için rahatsız ediciydi. Şimdi bu tarafta sadece bir USB Tip A yuvası ve ses girişi var - diğer iki USB yuvası sol tarafa taşındı, bu da portların dağıtımını daha da eşit hale getiriyor. Cihazda sadece Wi-Fi sunan bir LAN konektörü bulunmuyor. Ne yazık ki, kart okuyucu hala eksik ve mevcut USB Type-A bağlantı noktasının bir sonraki sürümde 3.1 yuvasıyla değiştirilmesini memnuniyetle karşılıyoruz. En azından USB yuvası şimdi Thunderbolt'u destekliyor.

Left: AC, HDMI, USB Type-A 3.1, USB Type-C (Thunderbolt)

Right: 3.5-mm audio jack, USB Type-A 2.0, Kensington lock slot

İletişim

Wi-Fi 6'yı destekleyen yeni Intel modem sayesinde, test birimimiz artık daha yüksek internet hızları sunabiliyor. Yeni sürüm, veri göndermede öncekinin iki katı ve alma sırasında üç kattan daha hızlıdır. Ancak, her iki yönde de birkaç büyük artış kaydettik. Bluetooth, 5.0 sürümüne dahildir.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1416 (1003^min - 1801^max) MBit/s
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Wireless-AC 9560	631 (503^min - 648^max) MBit/s -55%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	511 MBit/s -64%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	505 MBit/s -64%
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	968 (860^min - 1204^max) MBit/s
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Wireless-AC 9560	666 (585^min - 685^max) MBit/s -31%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	655 MBit/s -32%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	493 MBit/s -49%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø968 (860-1204)

Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1416 (1003-1801)

Güvenlik

Cihazda bir Kensington kilidi, TPM ve tıpkı öncekilerde olduğu gibi ok tuşlarının altına yerleştirilmiş bir parmak izi sensörü var.

Aksesuarlar

Acer, sadece olağan bileşenler de dahil olmak üzere aksesuarlar açısından çok cömert değildir.

Bakım

Alt kapak, 11 torx vida ile yerinde tutulur. Neyse ki, vidaları söktükten sonra kapağı çıkarmak, rakiplerin çoğunda olduğundan çok daha kolaydır. Bu yapıldıktan sonra, kullanıcılar bataryaya, tek soğutma fanına, SSD'ye vb. Erişebilirler. Ne yazık ki, 8 GB RAM modülü sıkıca lehimlendiği için değiştirilemez veya yükseltilemez.

Garanti

Üretici, kullanıcılara posta servisi de dahil olmak üzere iki yıllık bir garanti verir (en azından ilk yıl için).

Giriş Aygıtları - her şey aynı kalır

Tuş takımı

Selefinin klavyesinin çeşitli yönlerini eleştirdik - ancak pek bir şey değişmedi. Sayfa yukarı / aşağı ve Poz1 / Bitiş tuşları ile yerlerini paylaşmak zorunda olan çok dar ok tuşları, ters parlaklık sembolleri ve silme yanındaki entegre güç tuşu da dahil olmak üzere düzen aynı kaldı. fark edilir basınç noktası ve yazmanın kolay ve hızlı olması. Yazma gürültüsü iyileşmiş gibi görünüyor ve şimdi sadece boşluk çubuğu biraz daha yüksek olduğunda iyice kabul edilebilir. Ana birim yazarken sabit kalır ve zorlukla yol açar. Artık iki parlaklık seviyesi sunan arka aydınlatmadan da memnunuz.

Dokunmatik

Dokunmatik yüzey iyi kayma özelliklerine sahiptir ve yeterince büyüktür. Çeşitli hareketleri kolayca tanır. Ancak, tümleşik tuşların kullanımı biraz zor ve nispeten yüksek olmaya devam ediyor.

Dokunmatik ekran

Dizüstü bilgisayar dokunmatik ekranı ile de kullanılabilir. Bu çok sezgisel ve kullanımı kolaydır. Son kez yaptığımız tek eleştiri, girişler artan basınçla yapıldığında dizüstü bilgisayarın geriye doğru eğilme eğiliminde olmasıydı. Yeni modeli test ederken artık bu sorunu farketmedik. Menteşeler artık kuvvetli baskı altında daha kolay bir şekilde yer vererek taban ünitesini yerinde bırakıyor.

Ekran - yeni Acer daha parlak ve daha iyi

Slight backlight bleeding in the bottom corners

Selefinin ekranı kötü değildi, ancak parlaklık açısından birkaç zayıflığı vardı. Acer yine AU Optronics'den bir panel kullanmayı seçti. Bununla birlikte, bu yeni model yansıtıcı olmaktan ziyade mat bir yüzeye sahiptir.Parlaklık da iyileşti: Cihazın ortalama parlaklığı şimdi tüm karşılaştırma alanında ikinci en iyisi - sadece LG Gram yaklaşık% 5 daha parlak. Neyse ki, bunun diğer yönleri üzerinde olumsuz bir etkisi yoktur. Parlaklık dağılımı% 84'te iyi olmaya devam ediyor (selefi% 86 idi) Kenarlarda hafif bir arka ışık kanaması olduğunu fark ettik. Bununla birlikte, bu oldukça zayıftır ve sadece çok karanlık ortamlarda ve siyah içerikle fark edilir.


298 cd/m²	311 cd/m²	290 cd/m²
284 cd/m²	319 cd/m²	275 cd/m²
283 cd/m²	296 cd/m²	268 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

AU Optronics AUO253D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 319 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 291.6 cd/m² Minimum: 20.9 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 84 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 320 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1387:1 (Siyah: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.67
ΔE Greyscale 2.22 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.54

Download ICC Dosyası (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U AU Optronics AUO253D, IPS, CineCrystal, 1920x1080, 14.00	Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY AU Optronics AUO203D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR AU Optronics B140HAN06.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q Chi mei CMN14D5, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 LG Philips LP140WF7-SPG1, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T AU Optronics B140HAN03.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Display		3%	3%	0%	-4%	-6%
Display P3 Coverage	68.6	69.7 2%	69.9 2%	67 -2%	64.7 -6%	63.5 -7%
sRGB Coverage	94.7	97.1 3%	99.4 5%	98.9 4%	94.3 0%	90.9 -4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69.2	71 3%	71 3%	68.6 -1%	66 -5%	64.6 -7%
Response Times		25%	-6%	16%	14%	12%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	47 ?(21, 26)	37 ?(17, 20) 21%	55 ?(25, 30) -17%	40 ?(21, 19) 15%	36.8 ?(19.6, 17.2) 22%	42 ?(21, 21) 11%
Response Time Black / White *	32 ?(18, 14)	23 ?(13, 10) 28%	30 ?(14, 16) 6%	27 ?(16, 11) 16%	30 ?(18.4, 11.6) 6%	28 ?(16, 12) 12%
PWM Frequency				250 ?(10)
Screen		-25%	3%	-6%	-23%	-46%
Brightness middle	319	254 -20%	296 -7%	295 -8%	333.8 5%	321 1%
Brightness	292	231 -21%	272 -7%	276 -5%	307 5%	282 -3%
Brightness Distribution	84	86 2%	79 -6%	82 -2%	83 -1%	77 -8%
Black Level *	0.23	0.25 -9%	0.095 59%	0.215 7%	0.4 -74%	0.2 13%
Contrast	1387	1016 -27%	3116 125%	1372 -1%	835 -40%	1605 16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.53	3.85 -52%	3.1 -23%	2.6 -3%	3.54 -40%	6.35 -151%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.5	7.05 -28%	6.2 -13%	5.6 -2%	5.8 -5%	12.2 -122%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.67	3.66 -37%			2.36 12%	1.88 30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.22	4.1 -85%	4.5 -103%	3.4 -53%	4.7 -112%	8.35 -276%
Gamma	2.54 ^87%	2.43 ^91%	2.15 ^102%	2.08 ^106%	2.14 ^103%	2.51 ^88%
CCT	6381 ^102%	7369 ^88%	7277 ^89%	7192 ^90%	6261 ^104%	8227 ^79%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	62	63 2%	65 5%	63 2%	61.2 -1%	59 -5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	95	97 2%	99 4%	99 4%	94.7 0%	91 -4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		1% / -14%	0% / 2%	3% / -2%	-4% / -15%	-13% / -32%

* ... smaller is better

Swift 7'ye ayak uyduramasalar da, siyah değer ve kontrast hem arttı, hem de gri tonlama ve renk sapma değerlerinden memnun kaldık: İkincisi, karşılaştırmamızdaki en düşük değer. Panelin yanıt oranından pek etkilenmedik.

Acer, seleflerin alıcılarının açık havada çalışmasını zorlaştıran tüm zayıflıklarla uğraştı. Mevcut test ünitesindeki ekran yeterince parlak, mat yüzey rahatsız edici yansımalar sorunuyla ilgileniyor ve siyah değer ve kontrast daha da geliştirildi.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Görüş açısı kararlılığı, bir IPS panelinden beklendiği kadar iyidir. İçerik, geniş açılardan ve çok fazla parlaklık veya kontrast kaybetmeden açıkça görülebilir.

Performans - Acer Swift performanstan kaçınma ile ilgilenir

Swift 5, hala bilinmeyen entegre bir UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) ile Intel Core i5-1035G1 üzerinde çalışıyor. Ayrıca Kingston'dan 512 GB SSD ve 8 GB RAM içerir. Acer nihayet DDR4 RAM kullandı (öncekinden farklı olarak). RAM sıkıca lehimlenmeye devam etse de, en azından çift kanal modunda çalışır.Bu, ince ve hafif Swift 5'i ofis işleri ve tarama için özellikle uygun hale getirir, ancak yeni grafik birimi içeren yeni işlemci biraz daha söz veriyor performansa sahip olan selefin sunduklarından daha yüksek performans. Kullanıcılar, bu küçük Acer cihazıyla zorlu oyunlar oynayamayacak veya yoğun bir video düzenleme yapamayacaklar.LatencyMon yazılımı Swift için iyi sonuçlar veriyor - önemli gecikmeleri ölçmedi.

İşlemci

Bu cihazdaki işlemci nispeten yeni Intel Core i5-1035G1 - 7.5 ila 25 watt arasında yapılandırılabilen bir TDP ile Ice Lake tabanlı özellikle verimli bir dört çekirdekli CPU. Temel saat hızı yalnızca 1 GHz'de düşüktür, ancak CPU, TDP yapılandırmasına bağlı olarak 3,6 GHz'e veya aynı anda dört çekirdeğin tümü için 3,2 GHz'e ulaşabilir. Çip şimdi Wi-Fi 6 ve Thunderbolt 3'ün yanı sıra çeşitli AI özellikleri de içeriyor. 30 dakikalık Cinebench döngüsü sırasında birkaç şey fark ettik: İlk olarak, başlangıç noktası öncekiyle neredeyse aynı, ancak performans yeni Swift, eski Swift 5'teki gibi düşmektense ilk birkaç turdan sonra sabit kalıyor. Bu bir tesadüf olamaz - yeni modelde de aynı şey oldu.

Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel Core i5-1035G1: Ø494 (437.21-504.69)

Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø408 (359.46-494.25)

LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø480 (467.78-544.81)

Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø504 (494.08-654.12)

Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U; BIOS 204: Ø571 (557.17-647.21)

Cihazı hala soğukken açtıktan hemen sonra döngüye başlamış olmasına rağmen, Swift 5 pil üzerinde 518 nokta yerine 560'a ulaştı. Bu, performansın tamamen kararlı olmadığını gösterir - sonuçta, batarya üzerinde test yapmak genellikle performansta bir düşüşe neden olur.Tüm Swift'te, selefi ve Swift'i yenmesine rağmen eski CPU'larına rağmen rekabetinin çoğunu geride bırakamaz. 7. ZenBook 14 (Core i5-8265U) birinci oldu. Bu, bazı kısıtlamaların kaldığını ve Swift'in potansiyelini tam olarak kullanamayacağını gösterir.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (91.8 - 280, n=63, last 2 years)	237 Points +39%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1	170 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1 (144 - 171, n=8)	164.6 Points -3%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q Intel Core i5-8265U	162 Points -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Core i5-8265U	149 Points -12%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel Core i5-8250U	143 Points -16%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel Core i5-8250U	132 Points -22%
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR Intel Core i7-8500Y	129 Points -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (514 - 2581, n=71, last 2 years)	1762 Points +240%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Core i5-8265U	654 Points +26%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Core i5-8265U	647 Points +25%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1 (518 - 803, n=11)	613 Points +18%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1	518 Points
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel Core i5-8250U	517 Points 0%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q Intel Core i5-8265U	501 Points -3%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel Core i5-8250U	494 Points -5%
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR Intel Core i7-8500Y	246 Points -53%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (1.38 - 3.33, n=13, last 2 years)	2.88 Points +46%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1	1.97 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1 ()	1.97 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Core i5-8265U	1.73 Points -12%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel Core i5-8250U	0.91 Points -54%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (9.23 - 30, n=13, last 2 years)	22.2 Points +282%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Core i5-8265U	7.22 Points +24%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1	5.81 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1 ()	5.81 Points 0%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel Core i5-8250U	3.15 Points -46%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (11845 - 82102, n=6, last 2 years)	24548 Points +167%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1	9192 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1 ()	9192 Points 0%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel Core i5-8250U	5163 Points -44%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (13726 - 70566, n=6, last 2 years)	51405 Points +136%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1	21753 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1 ()	21753 Points 0%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel Core i5-8250U	11245 Points -48%

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

10054 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

17213

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

9655

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6687

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

9192 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

21753 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

36.61 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

5.81 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.97 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

518 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

49.47 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

170 Points

Yardım

... kıyaslama

Sistem performansı

Yeni Swift 5 iyi bir sistem performansı sunuyor. PCMark kriterlerinde güçlü şekilde kısılmış selefini kolayca yener ve hatta birçok senaryoda ilk sırada yer alır. Bununla birlikte, (eski CPU'larla donatılmış) rekabet genellikle çok geride değildir. Bununla birlikte, Swift 5'in 2018 sürümüne kıyasla sistem performansı açısından açık bir iyileşme var. Subjektif olarak, tüm önemli günlük görevlerin sorunsuz çalıştığını doğrulayabiliriz.

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Subnotebook (4384 - 7428, n=56, last 2 years)	5887 Points +55%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (3474 - 4122, n=6)	3824 Points 0%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	3807 Points
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	3725 Points -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	3643 Points -4%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	3463 Points -9%
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG	2884 Points -24%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	2619 Points -31%
Essentials
Average of class Subnotebook (8890 - 11168, n=56, last 2 years)	10254 Points +21%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	8482 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (7975 - 8684, n=6)	8423 Points -1%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	7867 Points -7%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	7618 Points -10%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	7132 Points -16%
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG	6709 Points -21%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	6312 Points -26%
Productivity
Average of class Subnotebook (6213 - 10279, n=56, last 2 years)	7860 Points +37%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	6382 Points +11%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	5939 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (4872 - 6766, n=6)	5834 Points +2%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	5749 Points 0%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	5740 Points
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG	5164 Points -10%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	3851 Points -33%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook (4093 - 9749, n=56, last 2 years)	6943 Points +126%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (2930 - 3329, n=6)	3102 Points +1%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	3076 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	2902 Points -6%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	2795 Points -9%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	2751 Points -11%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	2006 Points -35%
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG	1880 Points -39%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Subnotebook (4730 - 5285, n=3, last 2 years)	5030 Points +40%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	3733 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (3469 - 3988, n=5)	3653 Points +2%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	3590 Points
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	3264 Points -9%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	3218 Points -10%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	3170 Points -12%
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG	2588 Points -28%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	4950 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	4715 Points -5%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	4700 Points -5%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	4698 Points -5%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	4520 Points -9%
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG	4141 Points -16%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (2647 - 5035, n=5)	4051 Points -18%
Average of class Subnotebook (2972 - 5271, n=3, last 2 years)	3805 Points -23%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3590 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4950 puan
PCMark 10 Score		3807 puan
Yardım

Storage Device

The Swift uses a Kingston SSD with 512 GB of storage. This SSD is currently positioned at number 93 in our list of top storage devices. However, it does surprisingly well in our tests and manages to be placed at the top of our comparison table. Even the model in the Swift 7, which is twice as expensive as our test unit, cannot keep up according to our measurements. This must be one of the reasons for the good system performance results.

	Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG	Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	Average Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-29%	-33%	-10%	-54%	-7%	-9%
Write 4K	107.8	98 -9%	48.38 -55%	122.3 13%	74.7 -31%	99.9 -7%	87.6 ?(54.6 - 107.8, n=3) -19%
Read 4K	45.42	33.88 -25%	28.98 -36%	45.51 0%	14.89 -67%	40.03 -12%	40.3 ?(28.2 - 47.2, n=3) -11%
Write Seq	990	585 -41%	743 -25%	667 -33%	502 -49%	973 -2%	941 ?(840 - 993, n=3) -5%
Read Seq	1129	1149 2%	1027 -9%	713 -37%	498.6 -56%	1111 -2%	1070 ?(905 - 1176, n=3) -5%
Write 4K Q32T1	490.9	161.6 -67%	94.6 -81%	411.8 -16%	214.3 -56%	424.6 -14%	418 ?(355 - 491, n=3) -15%
Read 4K Q32T1	518	289.5 -44%	300 -42%	559 8%	225.5 -56%	255.9 -51%	428 ?(292 - 518, n=3) -17%
Write Seq Q32T1	1033	578 -44%	870 -16%	892 -14%	505 -51%	1300 26%	1035 ?(1033 - 1038, n=3) 0%
Read Seq Q32T1	1644	1563 -5%	1640 0%	1639 0%	560 -66%	1723 5%	1629 ?(1607 - 1644, n=3) -1%
AS SSD		-39%	-13%	-7%	-43%	-8%	-9%
Seq Read	1454	1382 -5%	1437 -1%	1222 -16%	476.1 -67%	1389 -4%	1398 ?(1336 - 1454, n=3) -4%
Seq Write	939	576 -39%	689 -27%	775 -17%	487.4 -48%	795 -15%	848 ?(653 - 953, n=3) -10%
4K Read	54.6	24.72 -55%	42.64 -22%	54.8 0%	30.57 -44%	37.3 -32%	45.1 ?(26.7 - 54.6, n=3) -17%
4K Write	100.8	90.8 -10%	112.8 12%	114.4 13%	66.1 -34%	130.8 30%	82.2 ?(52.7 - 100.8, n=3) -18%
4K-64 Read	954	274.6 -71%	488 -49%	896 -6%	352.9 -63%	653 -32%	852 ?(644 - 959, n=3) -11%
4K-64 Write	707	192.2 -73%	475.7 -33%	604 -15%	263.1 -63%	605 -14%	654 ?(483 - 772, n=3) -7%
Access Time Read *		0.075	0.054		0.092	0.114	0.04167 ?(0.051 - 0.074, n=3)
Access Time Write *	0.044	0.041 7%	0.034 23%	0.044 -0%	0.055 -25%	0.028 36%	0.05333 ?(0.044 - 0.072, n=3) -21%
Score Read	1154	438 -62%	674 -42%	1073 -7%	431 -63%	829 -28%	1037 ?(804 - 1154, n=3) -10%
Score Write	902	341 -62%	657 -27%	796 -12%	378 -58%	815 -10%	821 ?(601 - 961, n=3) -9%
Score Total	2635	969 -63%	1653 -37%	2411 -9%	1040 -61%	2048 -22%	2372 ?(1786 - 2695, n=3) -10%
Copy ISO MB/s	655	504 -23%	873 33%		514 -22%	601 -8%	655 ?() 0%
Copy Program MB/s	262.2	226.7 -14%	236 -10%		259.3 -1%	246.8 -6%	262 ?() 0%
Copy Game MB/s	542	372.8 -31%	572 6%		521 -4%	549 1%	542 ?() 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-34% / -35%	-23% / -21%	-9% / -8%	-49% / -47%	-8% / -8%	-9% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1

Sequential Read: 1124 MB/s

Sequential Write: 994 MB/s

512K Read: 908 MB/s

512K Write: 983 MB/s

4K Read: 46.9 MB/s

4K Write: 112.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 518 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 496.9 MB/s

GPU Performance

The Acer Swift does not have a dedicated GPU, although the fairly new Intel UHD Graphics G1 is supposed to be faster than the usual UHD Graphics units.

The GPU did a remarkably good job in the synthetic 3DMark benchmark and is clearly faster than the competition equipped with the UHD Graphics 620. The lead amounts to 36% in 3DMark 11 with the ZenBook taking second place. The difference between our test unit and the old Swift 5 was a whole 77%. The results are similar in the Fire Strike test but the differences are a little smaller in Cloud Gate.

We did not notice any particular loss in performance when the device was running on battery.

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Subnotebook (2979 - 16904, n=56, last 2 years)	8243 Points +228%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1	2516 Points
Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (1684 - 2578, n=15)	2171 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U	1851 Points -26%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1757 Points -30%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U	1740 Points -31%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1420 Points -44%
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y	1288 Points -49%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (13768 - 65911, n=39, last 2 years)	29386 Points +146%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1	11934 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U	10968 Points -8%
Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (7448 - 12698, n=14)	10795 Points -10%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	9643 Points -19%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U	9324 Points -22%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	7980 Points -33%
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y	7205 Points -40%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (2837 - 12349, n=60, last 2 years)	6047 Points +248%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1	1739 Points
Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (960 - 1755, n=15)	1480 Points -15%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U	1292 Points -26%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1194 Points -31%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U	1144 Points -34%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	995 Points -43%
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y	943 Points -46%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (811 - 4773, n=59, last 2 years)	2041 Points +351%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1	453 Points
Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (320 - 476, n=10)	420 Points -7%
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y	279 Points -38%

3DMark 06 1280x800 Score		12136 puan
3DMark Vantage P Result		8750 puan
3DMark 11 Performance		2730 puan
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		55398 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		9444 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1614 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score		512 puan
Yardım

... kıyaslama

Gaming Performance

Even if Intel has managed to get a little more performance out of its UHD Graphics G1, the Swift will never be ideal for gaming. Users will be able to play undemanding games at medium settings at the most. More-demanding titles such as The Witcher 3 can hardly be displayed smoothly even at the lowest settings. The Swift reaches an average of 27 fps using these settings although the high variability of the frame rate make the subjective gaming experience hardly appear smooth.

Rocket League is a little more promising. Users could potentially even manage to play it at Full HD with medium details. BioShock can also be displayed at medium details although the resolution would have to be reduced to 1366x768.

Again, the competition cannot keep up. The difference to the old Swift 5 is 50% in most cases (Rocket League) or even 100% (The Witcher 3). This makes the comparison with the AMD Vega more interesting.

The Witcher 3 | Rocket League | BioShock Infinite

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Subnotebook (37 - 249, n=54, last 2 years)	102.6 fps +280%
Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (26.8 - 35, n=6)	29.9 fps +11%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	27 fps
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615	12.1 fps -55%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	9.59 fps -64%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Subnotebook (29 - 264, n=47, last 2 years)	63.8 fps +256%
Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (16.4 - 21.6, n=5)	18.9 fps +6%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	17.9 fps
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	8 fps -55%
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615	5.9 fps -67%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Subnotebook (11.2 - 92, n=57, last 2 years)	35 fps +400%
Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (7 - 11.5, n=5)	9.42 fps +35%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	7 fps

Rocket League
1280x720 Performance
Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (54.8 - 69.5, n=2)	62.2 fps +14%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	57.6 fps +5%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	56.7 fps +3%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	54.8 fps
1920x1080 Performance
Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (43 - 58.8, n=2)	50.9 fps +18%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	43.44 fps +1%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	43 fps
1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX
Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (37 - 42.2, n=2)	39.6 fps +7%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	37 fps
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	31.6 fps -15%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	23.74 fps -36%
1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	24 fps
Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (22.8 - 24, n=2)	23.4 fps -2%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	21.4 fps -11%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	14.52 fps -39%

BioShock Infinite
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	75.9 fps
Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (58.4 - 82.6, n=7)	71.5 fps -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	67.4 fps -11%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	60.5 fps -20%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	59.9 fps -21%
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615	38.8 fps -49%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	42.1 fps
Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (30.3 - 46.8, n=7)	37.9 fps -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	36.7 fps -13%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	35.2 fps -16%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	34.3 fps -19%
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615	25 fps -41%
1366x768 High Preset
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	33.6 fps
Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (25 - 40.4, n=7)	31.8 fps -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	31 fps -8%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	30.26 fps -10%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	29.7 fps -12%
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615	18.2 fps -46%

	düşük	orta	yüksek	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	75.9	42.1	33.6	12.9
The Witcher 3 (2015)	27	17.9	7
Rocket League (2017)	54.8	37	24

Emissions - Calm and cool ultrabook

System Noise

The new Swift 5 remains nicely calm throughout our tests. While it isn't silent, the cooling fans are hardly noticeable even under load. But then that is what business users would expect and all competitors in today's field are similarly quiet. We did not notice any beeping or other noises coming from our test unit.

	Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Noise		-1%	2%	-1%	0%
off / environment *	30.3	30.3 -0%	28.2 7%	30.4 -0%	30.5 -1%
Idle Minimum *	30.3	30.3 -0%	28.4 6%	30.4 -0%	30.5 -1%
Idle Average *	30.3	30.3 -0%	28.4 6%	30.4 -0%	30.5 -1%
Idle Maximum *	30.6	31.2 -2%	28.4 7%	30.4 1%	30.9 -1%
Load Average *	32	33.1 -3%	35.7 -12%	34.1 -7%	32.7 -2%
Load Maximum *	33.7	34.4 -2%	34.2 -1%	34.4 -2%	31.5 7%

* ... smaller is better

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta		30.3 / 30.3 / 30.6 dB
Çalışırken		32 / 33.7 dB

	30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A)

Temperature

The surface temperatures are at room temperature while idling. When the device is put under maximum load, its temperatures reach a maximum value of 42 °C on the bottom - the top remains slightly cooler. This surface temperature should not prevent users from placing the device on their lap at any time. The competition can get a little hotter. The wrist rests, which are very important for everyday use, remain cool even under load with the heat development occurring mainly towards the back, near the display. Even there the heat is well distributed along the entire width of the device.

	Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG	Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Heat		-9%	-18%	-6%	-7%	-1%
Maximum Upper Side *	40	42.9 -7%	55 -38%	44.9 -12%	45.2 -13%	41 -3%
Maximum Bottom *	42.1	44.9 -7%	51.4 -22%	44.2 -5%	41.4 2%	41.4 2%
Idle Upper Side *	25.4	28.4 -12%	27.1 -7%	26.3 -4%	26.8 -6%	26.1 -3%
Idle Bottom *	26.1	28.5 -9%	27.1 -4%	26.6 -2%	29 -11%	25.8 1%

* ... smaller is better

Our one-hour stress test had a similar result as that of the predecessor: The Acer already starts off at below its base clock rate - only this time the base rate is no longer 1.6 GHz but 1 GHz and therefore the deviation is not quite as dramatic. After one hour the clock rates drop by another 100 MHz. Overall, Acer's new Swift 5 continues to throttle quite strongly, although the new CPU seems to deal with this fairly well - at least compared to the processor in the old Swift 5. Future competitors could be more powerful - provided they experience less throttling. The core temperatures still have a little breathing space and reach around 70 - 75 °C.

Maksimum yük

Bekleme


39.4 °C	40 °C	39.3 °C
35.8 °C	36.4 °C	31.3 °C
30 °C	29.4 °C	27.3 °C

Maksimum: 40 °C
Ortalama: 34.3 °C


41.2 °C	42.1 °C	41.7 °C
30.3 °C	37.7 °C	34 °C
28.1 °C	30.6 °C	30.3 °C

Maksimum: 42.1 °C
Ortalama: 35.1 °C

Güç kaynağı 40.8 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 23.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).

	Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG	Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1	LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Heat		-9%	-18%	-6%	-7%	-1%
Maximum Upper Side *	40	42.9 -7%	55 -38%	44.9 -12%	45.2 -13%	41 -3%
Maximum Bottom *	42.1	44.9 -7%	51.4 -22%	44.2 -5%	41.4 2%	41.4 2%
Idle Upper Side *	25.4	28.4 -12%	27.1 -7%	26.3 -4%	26.8 -6%	26.1 -3%
Idle Bottom *	26.1	28.5 -9%	27.1 -4%	26.6 -2%	29 -11%	25.8 1%

* ... smaller is better

Speakers

The speakers do a very good job at reproducing highs but leave room for improvement for other frequencies. The volume of the stereo speakers is too low overall and bass tones are hardly audible. Mids are balanced but uninspiring. Of course, speakers in a case of this size tend to have a hard time anyway, but the MacBook Pro shows that there are better solutions out there.

External audio devices can be connected via USB or the combined audio jack.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energy Management - more stamina despite higher demands

Power Consumption

The Swift 5 subnotebook does not require a lot of power in general but still doesn't compare well with its competitors. It has a higher consumption while idling and its predecessor was 30% more economical on average. Only the Asus has a similar level of power consumption.

Peak loads remain below 30 watt, which means that the 65-watt AC adapter provides more than enough power for this device.

Anlık tüketim

Kapalı / Bekleme modu	0.43 / 0.47 Watt
Boşta	4.3 / 7.5 / 8.9 Watt
Çalışırken	29 / 29.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1, IPS, CineCrystal, 1920x1080, 14.00	Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	Average of class Subnotebook
Power Consumption		30%	36%	29%	10%	1%	-9%	-45%
Idle Minimum *	4.3	2.8 35%	2.7 37%	2.3 47%	2.7 37%	2.7 37%	4.13 ?(2.8 - 7.3, n=12) 4%	4.91 ?(1.77 - 11.8, n=62, last 2 years) -14%
Idle Average *	7.5	4.8 36%	4.9 35%	4.6 39%	6 20%	5.8 23%	7.07 ?(4.8 - 10, n=12) 6%	8.37 ?(4.6 - 17.4, n=62, last 2 years) -12%
Idle Maximum *	8.9	6.3 29%	5.8 35%	5.8 35%	6.5 27%	10.2 -15%	8.36 ?(5.4 - 11.7, n=12) 6%	10.4 ?(5.1 - 22.4, n=62, last 2 years) -17%
Load Average *	29	21 28%	15.7 46%	22.4 23%	32.5 -12%	34.9 -20%	30.6 ?(22 - 37.2, n=11) -6%	45.9 ?(19.1 - 83.3, n=61, last 2 years) -58%
Load Maximum *	29.4	23 22%	21.7 26%	29 1%	35.5 -21%	35 -19%	45.6 ?(29.4 - 52.7, n=12) -55%	66 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=62, last 2 years) -124%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

The battery has a capacity of 56 Wh and is supposed to last 12 hours. Acer had installed a 36-Wh battery in the last model, which had a negative impact on the battery life. Fortunately, we've got the larger capacity back this time.

The laptop managed at least 2 h 14 m in the synthetic tests (all power guzzlers turned on, high load) and a maximum of 14 h 45 m (minimum brightness, all power-saving options turned on, minimum load).

The Swift lasted almost 8 hours in the more important Wi-Fi test (performance set to two-thirds, brightness to 150 cd/m², browsing the web). The predecessor only managed just over 5 hours, so this is a clear improvement.

The video test (minimum performance, brightness set to 150 cd/m², H.264-encoded video in a loop) lasted just over 8 hours on our new Swift.

The improved battery life is only really noticeable in our Wi-Fi test - after all, the new model also consumes almost 30% more power. That was probably one of the main reasons Acer decided to switch back to a larger battery. Of the other competitors only the TravelMate does worse with a difference of around 11%. The Swift 7 manages around 26% longer runtimes despite having a smaller battery (31 Wh).

Batarya ömrü

Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)		14h 45min
WiFi Websurfing		7h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 05min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)		2h 14min

	Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 56 Wh	Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 36 Wh	Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, 31.9 Wh	Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 36 Wh	LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh	Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		-4%	26%	-11%	75%	20%	32%
Reader / Idle	885	962 9%	1273 44%	1075 21%	2238 153%		1252 ?(581 - 2550, n=9, last 2 years) 41%
H.264	485	466 -4%	631 30%				798 ?(426 - 1153, n=31, last 2 years) 65%
WiFi v1.3	468	313 -33%	526 12%	378 -19%	720 54%	563 20%	627 ?(303 - 1144, n=64, last 2 years) 34%
Load	134	150 12%	160 19%	88 -34%	159 19%		115.1 ?(61 - 197, n=48, last 2 years) -14%

Artılar

+ küçük ve hafif

+ hızlı Wi-Fi 6

+ Şimşek 3

+ bakım için kolay erişim

+ parlak, yüksek kontrastlı dokunmatik ekran

+ hızlı tümleşik Intel grafik birimi

+ hızlı SSD

+ rahatla ve oluruna bırak

Eksiler

- yetersiz port seçimi, 1x USB 2.0

- RAM lehimlenmiş, yükseltilemez

- klavye düzenindeki bazı zayıflıklar

- CPU kısılmaya devam ediyor

- nispeten yüksek tüketim

- sadece ortalama pil ömrü

Verdict - good upgrade from Acer

The Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T, provided by Acer

We must compliment Acer for accepting and responding to criticism. The manufacturer has made many changes in the right places - and the result is impressive.

Most importantly, Acer has finally managed to get the performance right again. Our test unit was able to easily keep up with its competition - unlike its highly throttled predecessor. We are also pleased with the display that is finally brighter and has a matte surface. The increased brightness does not impact the contrast ratio, which has improved as well. Another positive change is the return to a larger battery and thus a longer battery life for the system. We were also surprised by the good SSD and general system performance as well as the 3D performance, which can beat the competition equipped with older Intel UHD Graphics chips. The faster Wi-Fi and the integration of Thunderbolt 3 complete the list of positives.

There is not much we can criticize about the current Swift 5. The USB 2.0 port could have been swapped for a more modern USB standard and the card reader is missing again. The port selection is also more limited than on other ultrabooks. We would also like to mention that the RAM is soldered on, which means that it cannot be exchanged or expanded. The power consumption has increased, which means that the battery life is average at best despite the larger battery capacity. The performance itself has improved, but the device still doesn't manage to make the most out of its CPU. But this can be put down to the usual necessary compromise between performance and cooling, which Acer has solved quite well for the Swift 5.

A lot of praise and hardly any criticism for the new Swift 5. The 14-inch ultrabook is small and light, has a good touch screen and it offers the right performance. It seems to have been given a useful all-round upgrade compared to its predecessor.

Considering these results, we are happy to recommend the new Acer, which is currently available for around $900.

Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U - 2020-01-09 01/09/2020 v7
Christian Hintze

İşcilik

79 / 98 → 81%

Klavye

81%

Mouse

91%

Bağlanılabilirlik

61 / 75 → 81%

Ağırlık

76 / 20-75 → 100%

Batarya

77%

Görüntü

88%

Oyun performansı

53 / 78 → 68%

Uygulama performansı

84 / 85 → 98%

Isınma

93%

Ses

96%

Audio

58 / 91 → 64%

Camera

33 / 85 → 39%

Ortalama

75%

86%

Subnotebook - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 308 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Acer Swift 5 Laptop İnceleme: 14 inç ultrabook için çok yönlü bir iyileştirme

Christian Hintze, 2020-01-28 (Update: 2020-01-28)

Acer Swift 5 Laptop İnceleme: 14 inç ultrabook için çok yönlü bir iyileştirme

Kasa - Acer ultrabook'un ayrıntılarındaki değişiklikler

Boyut Karşılaştırma

Bağlantı - daha iyi bağlantı noktası konumlandırma özelliğine sahip cimri Swift

İletişim

Güvenlik

Aksesuarlar

Bakım

Garanti

Giriş Aygıtları - her şey aynı kalır

Dokunmatik

Dokunmatik ekran

Ekran - yeni Acer daha parlak ve daha iyi

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Performans - Acer Swift performanstan kaçınma ile ilgilenir

İşlemci

Sistem performansı

Storage Device

GPU Performance

Gaming Performance

Emissions - Calm and cool ultrabook

System Noise

Temperature

Speakers

Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Energy Management - more stamina despite higher demands

Power Consumption

Battery Life

Artılar

Eksiler

Verdict - good upgrade from Acer

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare