Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarKısa inceleme: Huawei P20 Pro
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aydınlatma: 95 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 569 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Siyah: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.31
| Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.10 | Huawei P10 Plus LTPS, 2560x1440, 5.50 | Apple iPhone X Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.80 | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.20 | Google Pixel 2 XL P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6.00 | LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6.00 | OnePlus 5T AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01 | HTC U11 Plus Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -38% | -4% | -38% | -64% | -136% | -39% | -55% | |
| Brightness middle | 569 | 568 0% | 600 5% | 565 -1% | 415 -27% | 432 -24% | 425 -25% | 361 -37% |
| Brightness | 578 | 562 -3% | 606 5% | 571 -1% | 420 -27% | 428 -26% | 423 -27% | 356 -38% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 92 -3% | 94 -1% | 96 1% | 87 -8% | 87 -8% | 92 -3% | 90 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.21 | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 2.4 -85% | 1.2 8% | 2.3 -77% | 2.7 -108% | 4.18 -222% | 2.1 -62% | 2.5 -92% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.1 | 3.8 -81% | 3 -43% | 4.8 -129% | 4.3 -105% | 8.53 -306% | 3.4 -62% | 5.3 -152% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 2.5 -56% | 1.6 -0% | 1.9 -19% | 3.3 -106% | 5.3 -231% | 2.5 -56% | 1.7 -6% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.37 93% | 2.23 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.36 93% | 2.33 94% | 2.32 95% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6401 102% | 6779 96% | 6707 97% | 6332 103% | 6787 96% | 7487 87% | 6455 101% | 6580 99% |
| Contrast | 1321 | 1719 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 238.1 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (21.5 - 25.9, n=2) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (788 - 887, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (177 - 6114, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (33.1 - 58.6, n=8) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6692 - 11838, n=8) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6221, n=8) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (119 - 187, n=8) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P20 Pro | Huawei P10 Plus | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | OnePlus 5T | Google Pixel 2 XL | LG V30 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -2% | -24% | -26% | -20% | -41% | 8% | 170% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 832 | 733 -12% | 819 -2% | 699 -16% | 760 -9% | 669 -20% | 760 ? -9% | 1497 ? 80% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 196.7 | 182.6 -7% | 204.9 4% | 203.4 3% | 195.3 -1% | 193.2 -2% | 297 ? 51% | 1107 ? 463% |
| Random Read 4KB | 144.3 | 173.1 20% | 129.7 -10% | 138.1 -4% | 170.6 18% | 78.2 -46% | 152.9 ? 6% | 246 ? 70% |
| Random Write 4KB | 160.5 | 149.8 -7% | 22.74 -86% | 20 -88% | 17.84 -89% | 10.21 -94% | 131.6 ? -18% | 270 ? 68% |
| Real Racing 3 | |||
| Ayarlar | Değer | ||
| high | 51 fps | ||
| World of Tanks Blitz | |||
| Ayarlar | Değer | ||
| high, 0xAA, 0xAF | 60 fps | ||
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Ayarlar | Değer | ||
| minimal | 60 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Huawei P20 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Kapalı / Bekleme modu |   0.01 / 0.28 Watt |
| Boşta |  0.84 / 1.54 / 1.57 Watt |
| Çalışırken |
2.47 / 2.49 Watt |
    
| |
| Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | HTC U11 Plus 3930 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -132% | -21% | -66% | -55% | -74% | -44% | -88% | -73% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.84 | 1.03 -23% | 0.68 19% | 1.03 -23% | 0.51 39% | 1.28 -52% | 0.72 14% | 0.978 ? -16% | 0.897 ? -7% |
| Idle Average * | 1.54 | 2.61 -69% | 0.95 38% | 2.4 -56% | 1.62 -5% | 1.87 -21% | 1.37 11% | 2.12 ? -38% | 1.452 ? 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.57 | 2.83 -80% | 1.09 31% | 2.6 -66% | 1.87 -19% | 1.89 -20% | 1.41 10% | 2.51 ? -60% | 1.629 ? -4% |
| Load Average * | 2.47 | 7.03 -185% | 4.58 -85% | 2.96 -20% | 3.92 -59% | 3.73 -51% | 3.46 -40% | 5.01 ? -103% | 5.55 ? -125% |
| Load Maximum * | 2.49 | 10.08 -305% | 5.16 -107% | 6.6 -165% | 8.27 -232% | 8.08 -224% | 7.83 -214% | 8.1 ? -225% | 8.31 ? -234% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | HTC U11 Plus 3930 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -14% | -24% | -16% | -29% | -12% | -1% | -6% | 11% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1727 | 1655 -4% | 1343 -22% | 1625 -6% | 1292 -25% | 1706 -1% | 1914 11% | 1754 2% | 1744 1% |
| H.264 | 784 | 756 -4% | 674 -14% | 611 -22% | 634 -19% | 672 -14% | 822 5% | 799 2% | 929 18% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 744 | 760 2% | 521 -30% | 607 -18% | 564 -24% | 581 -22% | 774 4% | 718 -3% | 818 10% |
| Load | 345 | 174 -50% | 237 -31% | 291 -16% | 180 -48% | 302 -12% | 267 -23% | 257 -26% | 398 15% |
Artılar
Eksiler
Huawei P20 Pro harika bir akıllı telefon. Temel olarak Mate 10 Pro alınıp, bazı şeylerin daha iyi yapıldığını söylemek mümkün. Mate 10 Pro estetik olarak hoş bir tasarıma, daha iyi arama kalitesine ve daha uzun batarya ömrüne şu sıralar daha ucuz bir fiyata sahip diyebiliriz. P20 Pro ise 3lü Leica kamerası ile tüm rekabeti yerle bir ediyor.
Üçlü Leica kamerası ile P20 Pro diğer tüm rakiplerin kameralarının kıyaslanacağı yeni standardı belirliyor.
Cihazın donanımı da takdire şayan. Kirin 970 gibi hızlı bir sistem çipi, yeterince depolama alanı, MIMO WiFi, IP67 sertifikası, güçlü LTE performansı. 4000 mAh batarya ve etkileyici ekran. Tabi kulaklık çıkışının olmayışı, depolama alanının arttırılamaması, 1440p ekranın olmaması gibi dezavantajları da mevcut.
Tüm bunlara karşın Leica kameraları ile P20 Pro sadece uygun koşullarda değil düşük ışık gibi ortamlarda bile harika resimler çekmenize olanak sağlıyor. Video kaydı belki daha iyi olabilirdi, mesela 60 fps de Ultra HD video kaydı mümkün değil. Ama genel olarak P20 Pro tüm akıllı telefonlar arasında en iyi kameraya sahip.
Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.
Huawei P20 Pro
-
04/19/2018 v6(old)
Daniel Schmidt
Pricecompare
