Notebookcheck

Kısa inceleme: Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus

Daniel Schmidt, 03/31/2018

İnce ayar.Samsung'un ana gemisi sadece daha geniş bir ekran sunmakla kalmıyor, ayrıca çift kamera ve daha fazla bellek ile geliyor.

Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Galaxy Seri)
İşlemci
Samsung Exynos 9810
Grafik kartı
ARM Mali-G72 MP18
Bellek
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Görüntü
6.2 inç 18.5:9, 2960 x 1440 pixel 531 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, 10-point multi-touch, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, parlak: evet
Harddisk
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 50.1 GB Boş
Bağlantılar
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ses çıkışları: combined headphone and microphone jack (3.5 mm), Kart okuyucular: microSD up to 400 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: iris scanner, fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2, MST, Ant+
Network
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 34, 39) LTE Cat. 18 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66), LTE, GPS
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 8.5 x 158.1 x 73.8
Batarya
13.48 Wh, 3500 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3.85 V
İşletim sistemi
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix dual camera (f/1.5-2.4, 26mm, 1/2.55", 1.4 µm, Dual Pixel PDAF) + (f/2.4, 52mm, 1/3.6", 1 µm, AF)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/1.7, 25mm, 1/3.6", 1.22 µm
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: two speakers, Klavye: virtual, USB cable, power supply, SIM tool, headset, 2 USB adapters, QuickStart guide, Samsung UI 9.0, Microsoft Apps, Galaxy App Store, 24 Ay Garanti, IP67, USB Type-C 3.1 (Gen. 1), fanless
Ağırlık
189 g, Güç kaynağı: 62 g
Fiyat
949 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
939 MBit/s ∼100% +44%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼69%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
573 MBit/s ∼61% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
368 MBit/s ∼39% -44%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 MBit/s ∼36% -48%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
239 MBit/s ∼25% -63%
Average of class Smartphone
  (30.5 - 939, n=243)
189 MBit/s ∼20% -71%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s ∼100% +26%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
587 MBit/s ∼89% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼79%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
456 MBit/s ∼70% -12%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
279 MBit/s ∼43% -46%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
225 MBit/s ∼34% -57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 703, n=243)
185 MBit/s ∼28% -64%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Test chart: main lens (f/2.4)
Test chart: main lens (f/2.4)
Test chart: main lens (f/1.5)
Test chart: main lens (f/1.5)
Test chart: telephoto lens (f/2.4)
586
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
565
cd/m²
584
cd/m²
565
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
582
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
562
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 586 cd/m² Ortalama: 570.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.56 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 96 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 565 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Siyah: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.16
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Apple iPhone X
Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Google Pixel 2 XL
P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6
HTC U11 Plus
Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6
OnePlus 5T
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01
Screen
11%
19%
8%
-24%
-15%
-8%
Brightness middle
565
560
-1%
600
6%
629
11%
415
-27%
361
-36%
425
-25%
Brightness
571
562
-2%
606
6%
636
11%
420
-26%
356
-38%
423
-26%
Brightness Distribution
96
93
-3%
94
-2%
94
-2%
87
-9%
90
-6%
92
-4%
Black Level *
0.21
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.3
1.7
26%
1.2
48%
1.7
26%
2.7
-17%
2.5
-9%
2.1
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.8
3.4
29%
3
37%
3.6
25%
4.3
10%
5.3
-10%
3.4
29%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.9
1.6
16%
1.6
16%
2.4
-26%
3.3
-74%
1.7
11%
2.5
-32%
Gamma
2.16 111%
2.13 113%
2.23 108%
2.15 112%
2.36 102%
2.21 109%
2.32 103%
CCT
6332 103%
6435 101%
6707 97%
6337 103%
6787 96%
6580 99%
6455 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87
Contrast
1719

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 215.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 215.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 215.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8895 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Grayscales (profile: adaptive [optimized], color space: DCI-P3)
Grayscales (profile: adaptive [optimized], color space: DCI-P3)
Mixed colors (profile: adaptive [optimized], color space: DCI-P3)
Mixed colors (profile: adaptive [optimized], color space: DCI-P3)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
222290 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼74% -26%
Apple iPhone X
197851 Points ∼89% -11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points ∼80% -20%
Google Pixel 2 XL
166151 Points ∼75% -25%
LG V30
173749 Points ∼78% -22%
HTC U11 Plus
183057 Points ∼82% -18%
OnePlus 5T
172124 Points ∼77% -23%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
179595 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (217950 - 222290, n=2)
220120 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=336)
70824 Points ∼32% -68%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
250577 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone X
256297 Points ∼100% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
212278 Points ∼83% -15%
Google Pixel 2 XL
204654 Points ∼80% -18%
HTC U11 Plus
217442 Points ∼85% -13%
OnePlus 5T
214815 Points ∼84% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (243861 - 250577, n=2)
247219 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 290397, n=113)
103239 Points ∼40% -59%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5319 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5195 Points ∼74% -2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼99% +30%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6994 Points ∼100% +31%
LG V30
5603 Points ∼80% +5%
HTC U11 Plus
6695 Points ∼96% +26%
OnePlus 5T
6595 Points ∼94% +24%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6998 Points ∼100% +32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (5291 - 5319, n=2)
5305 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3138 - 8601, n=201)
4453 Points ∼64% -16%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5822 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼68% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼99% +45%
Google Pixel 2 XL
8258 Points ∼97% +42%
LG V30
6854 Points ∼80% +18%
HTC U11 Plus
7964 Points ∼93% +37%
OnePlus 5T
7739 Points ∼90% +33%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
8553 Points ∼100% +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (5736 - 5822, n=2)
5779 Points ∼68% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2516 - 10264, n=365)
4677 Points ∼55% -20%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1109 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼69% +5%
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points ∼100% +52%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼73% +11%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1186 Points ∼71% +7%
LG V30
1009 Points ∼60% -9%
HTC U11 Plus
1159 Points ∼69% +5%
OnePlus 5T
1329 Points ∼79% +20%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
1300 Points ∼77% +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (1099 - 1109, n=2)
1104 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=441)
672 Points ∼40% -39%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6370 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼66% -4%
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points ∼100% +45%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼40% -43%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6142 Points ∼66% -4%
LG V30
5949 Points ∼64% -7%
HTC U11 Plus
6086 Points ∼66% -4%
OnePlus 5T
6100 Points ∼66% -4%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6144 Points ∼66% -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (6370 - 6373, n=2)
6372 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=441)
1505 Points ∼16% -76%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2625 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼76% +19%
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points ∼29% -54%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼100% +58%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2927 Points ∼71% +12%
LG V30
2091 Points ∼50% -20%
HTC U11 Plus
3376 Points ∼82% +29%
OnePlus 5T
3845 Points ∼93% +46%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3652 Points ∼88% +39%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (2625 - 2669, n=2)
2647 Points ∼64% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=441)
1124 Points ∼27% -57%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6413 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼52% -17%
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points ∼100% +60%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼51% -18%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5914 Points ∼58% -8%
LG V30
4238 Points ∼41% -34%
HTC U11 Plus
5926 Points ∼58% -8%
OnePlus 5T
5872 Points ∼57% -8%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
5918 Points ∼58% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (6234 - 6413, n=2)
6324 Points ∼62% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=441)
2244 Points ∼22% -65%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3302 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼88% 0%
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points ∼100% +13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼84% -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3351 Points ∼90% +1%
LG V30
2702 Points ∼72% -18%
HTC U11 Plus
3447 Points ∼92% +4%
OnePlus 5T
3678 Points ∼98% +11%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3625 Points ∼97% +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (3285 - 3302, n=2)
3294 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=444)
1134 Points ∼30% -66%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6202 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
8295 Points ∼97% +34%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points ∼100% +38%
Google Pixel 2 XL
7568 Points ∼88% +22%
LG V30
8016 Points ∼94% +29%
HTC U11 Plus
7946 Points ∼93% +28%
OnePlus 5T
8000 Points ∼93% +29%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (6202 - 6219, n=2)
6211 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14362, n=138)
3831 Points ∼45% -38%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
8963 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼65% -25%
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points ∼100% +14%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼66% -24%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6253 Points ∼61% -30%
LG V30
6078 Points ∼59% -32%
HTC U11 Plus
6771 Points ∼66% -24%
OnePlus 5T
6670 Points ∼65% -26%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6711 Points ∼65% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (8786 - 8963, n=2)
8875 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1131 - 10558, n=185)
3970 Points ∼39% -56%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3776 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼47% -47%
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points ∼100% +13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼45% -50%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1916 Points ∼45% -49%
LG V30
1900 Points ∼45% -50%
HTC U11 Plus
1935 Points ∼45% -49%
OnePlus 5T
1962 Points ∼46% -48%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
1911 Points ∼45% -49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (3688 - 3776, n=2)
3732 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=186)
1175 Points ∼28% -69%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2469 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼80% 0%
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points ∼77% -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼94% +16%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3028 Points ∼99% +23%
LG V30
2931 Points ∼96% +19%
HTC U11 Plus
3049 Points ∼99% +23%
OnePlus 5T
3068 Points ∼100% +24%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
2986 Points ∼97% +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (2469 - 2486, n=2)
2478 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (530 - 3669, n=290)
1554 Points ∼51% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3582 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼87% -3%
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points ∼86% -3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼71% -21%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3872 Points ∼96% +8%
LG V30
3903 Points ∼97% +9%
HTC U11 Plus
3987 Points ∼99% +11%
OnePlus 5T
4016 Points ∼100% +12%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3991 Points ∼99% +11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (3553 - 3582, n=2)
3568 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (67 - 5220, n=290)
1056 Points ∼26% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3256 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼85% -2%
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points ∼84% -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼76% -12%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3646 Points ∼97% +12%
LG V30
3635 Points ∼97% +12%
HTC U11 Plus
3732 Points ∼99% +15%
OnePlus 5T
3758 Points ∼100% +15%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3713 Points ∼99% +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (3244 - 3256, n=2)
3250 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (83 - 4732, n=298)
1012 Points ∼27% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2496 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points ∼80% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼94% +16%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2995 Points ∼98% +20%
LG V30
2808 Points ∼91% +13%
HTC U11 Plus
3071 Points ∼100% +23%
OnePlus 5T
3031 Points ∼99% +21%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3071 Points ∼100% +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (2496 - 2600, n=2)
2548 Points ∼83% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (524 - 3642, n=321)
1455 Points ∼47% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4637 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points ∼79% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼55% -28%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5856 Points ∼97% +26%
LG V30
5895 Points ∼97% +27%
HTC U11 Plus
6060 Points ∼100% +31%
OnePlus 5T
5791 Points ∼96% +25%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6035 Points ∼100% +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (4569 - 4637, n=2)
4603 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 8312, n=321)
1426 Points ∼24% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3895 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points ∼79% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼65% -17%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4831 Points ∼97% +24%
LG V30
4738 Points ∼95% +22%
HTC U11 Plus
4982 Points ∼100% +28%
OnePlus 5T
4816 Points ∼97% +24%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
4969 Points ∼100% +28%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (3895 - 3911, n=2)
3903 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 6378, n=329)
1227 Points ∼25% -68%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
26226 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼79% -20%
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points ∼97% -2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼85% -14%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20233 Points ∼76% -23%
LG V30
14601 Points ∼55% -44%
HTC U11 Plus
20820 Points ∼78% -21%
OnePlus 5T
21348 Points ∼80% -19%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
21239 Points ∼80% -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (26226 - 26851, n=2)
26539 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5462 - 36494, n=476)
12164 Points ∼46% -54%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
46610 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼29% -29%
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points ∼100% +141%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼30% -27%
Google Pixel 2 XL
54156 Points ∼48% +16%
LG V30
55271 Points ∼49% +19%
HTC U11 Plus
58307 Points ∼52% +25%
OnePlus 5T
58097 Points ∼52% +25%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
55485 Points ∼49% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (46610 - 48433, n=2)
47522 Points ∼42% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=476)
15585 Points ∼14% -67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
39745 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼46% -26%
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points ∼100% +61%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼48% -23%
Google Pixel 2 XL
39456 Points ∼61% -1%
LG V30
34139 Points ∼53% -14%
HTC U11 Plus
41644 Points ∼65% +5%
OnePlus 5T
42022 Points ∼65% +6%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
40848 Points ∼64% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (39745 - 41093, n=2)
40419 Points ∼63% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=477)
13472 Points ∼21% -66%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
147 fps ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼59% -29%
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps ∼100% +21%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼63% -24%
Google Pixel 2 XL
112 fps ∼63% -24%
LG V30
113 fps ∼64% -23%
HTC U11 Plus
113 fps ∼64% -23%
OnePlus 5T
113 fps ∼64% -23%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
105 fps ∼59% -29%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (144 - 147, n=2)
146 fps ∼82% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=502)
27 fps ∼15% -82%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
60 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps ∼99% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼98% -2%
LG V30
60 fps ∼100% 0%
HTC U11 Plus
60 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (60 - 60, n=2)
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=505)
23.5 fps ∼39% -61%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
74 fps ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼57% -32%
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps ∼100% +19%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼61% -27%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼67% -20%
LG V30
59 fps ∼67% -20%
HTC U11 Plus
60 fps ∼68% -19%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼68% -19%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
54 fps ∼61% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (73 - 74, n=2)
73.5 fps ∼83% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=425)
14.4 fps ∼16% -81%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
45 fps ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼65% -16%
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps ∼100% +30%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼96% +24%
Google Pixel 2 XL
35 fps ∼60% -22%
LG V30
35 fps ∼60% -22%
HTC U11 Plus
35 fps ∼60% -22%
OnePlus 5T
53 fps ∼91% +18%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
36 fps ∼62% -20%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (45 - 45, n=2)
45 fps ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=427)
14.5 fps ∼25% -68%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
47 fps ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼86% -11%
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps ∼100% +4%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼76% -21%
Google Pixel 2 XL
41 fps ∼84% -13%
LG V30
40 fps ∼82% -15%
HTC U11 Plus
41 fps ∼84% -13%
OnePlus 5T
41 fps ∼84% -13%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
40 fps ∼82% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (46 - 47, n=2)
46.5 fps ∼95% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=288)
12.5 fps ∼26% -73%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
24 fps ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼52% -4%
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps ∼100% +84%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼86% +58%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20 fps ∼45% -17%
LG V30
19 fps ∼43% -21%
HTC U11 Plus
21 fps ∼48% -12%
OnePlus 5T
37 fps ∼84% +54%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
22 fps ∼50% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (24 - 24, n=2)
24 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.5 - 110, n=290)
12.6 fps ∼29% -47%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
28 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps ∼89% -11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼75% -25%
Google Pixel 2 XL
24 fps ∼86% -14%
LG V30
24 fps ∼86% -14%
HTC U11 Plus
25 fps ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 5T
25 fps ∼89% -11%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
25 fps ∼89% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (28 - 28, n=2)
28 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.76 - 35, n=219)
8.51 fps ∼30% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
14 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps ∼57% -7%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼96% +57%
Google Pixel 2 XL
13 fps ∼57% -7%
LG V30
13 fps ∼57% -7%
HTC U11 Plus
13 fps ∼57% -7%
OnePlus 5T
23 fps ∼100% +64%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
15 fps ∼65% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (14 - 14, n=2)
14 fps ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 50, n=222)
7.82 fps ∼34% -44%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
35.83 fps ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25.06 fps ∼65% -30%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21.49 fps ∼56% -40%
Google Pixel 2 XL
37.71 fps ∼97% +5%
HTC U11 Plus
38.71 fps ∼100% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (34 - 35.8, n=2)
34.9 fps ∼90% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)
12.1 fps ∼31% -66%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1481 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1280 Points ∼75% -14%
Apple iPhone X
1702 Points ∼100% +15%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
788 Points ∼46% -47%
Google Pixel 2 XL
853 Points ∼50% -42%
HTC U11 Plus
868 Points ∼51% -41%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (1436 - 1481, n=2)
1459 Points ∼86% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 1702, n=62)
573 Points ∼34% -61%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points ∼100% +222%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.59 Points ∼31%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (67.7 - 69.6, n=2)
68.7 Points ∼31% -1%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
66.689 Points ∼30% -4%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
66.477 Points ∼30% -4%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)
64.948 Points ∼29% -7%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
64.709 Points ∼29% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
62.198 Points ∼28% -11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.63 Points ∼25% -19%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points ∼24% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (11.4 - 224, n=360)
33.7 Points ∼15% -52%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points ∼100% +139%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (14760 - 15233, n=2)
14997 Points ∼43% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
14050 Points ∼40% -5%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
12929 Points ∼37% -12%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
12509 Points ∼35% -15%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)
11553 Points ∼33% -22%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
11308 Points ∼32% -23%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points ∼30% -29%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points ∼30% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=496)
5011 Points ∼14% -66%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=515)
11883 ms * ∼100% -477%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * ∼31% -76%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3590.6 ms * ∼30% -74%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
3434.1 ms * ∼29% -67%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
3175.3 ms * ∼27% -54%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)
3131.6 ms * ∼26% -52%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
3096 ms * ∼26% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2236.7 ms * ∼19% -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (2060 - 2078, n=2)
2069 ms * ∼17% -0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2059.7 ms * ∼17%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms * ∼6% +65%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points ∼100% +116%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
194 Points ∼55% +18%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
181 Points ∼51% +10%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)
179 Points ∼51% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points ∼46%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (163 - 164, n=2)
164 Points ∼46% 0%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
161 Points ∼45% -2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points ∼45% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
154 Points ∼44% -6%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points ∼39% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=246)
99.4 Points ∼28% -39%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S9 PlusSamsung Galaxy S8 PlusLG V30HTC U11 PlusMotorola Moto Z2 ForceHuawei P10 PlusAverage 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-12%
-28%
77%
38%
82%
6%
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
57.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-15%
47.2
-30%
51.26 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-24%
54.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-19%
33.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-50%
49.2 (17.1 - 67.2, n=19)
-27%
43.8 (6.38 - 87.1, n=270)
-35%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-10%
62.8
-21%
75.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
77.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
54.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-32%
66.1 (18 - 84.7, n=19)
-17%
62.1 (10.8 - 96.5, n=270)
-22%
Random Write 4KB
22.74
15.27
-33%
10.21
-55%
135.69
497%
78.62
246%
149.78
559%
43.6 (8.77 - 152, n=25)
92%
13.5 (0.14 - 164, n=549)
-41%
Random Read 4KB
129.68
127.18
-2%
78.17
-40%
132.39
2%
148.76
15%
173.06
33%
135 (78.2 - 173, n=25)
4%
34.5 (1.59 - 173, n=549)
-73%
Sequential Write 256KB
204.94
194.18
-5%
193.22
-6%
207.94
1%
213.61
4%
182.64
-11%
194 (133 - 214, n=25)
-5%
71.7 (2.99 - 228, n=549)
-65%
Sequential Read 256KB
818.69
787.6
-4%
669.48
-18%
728.37
-11%
696.35
-15%
732.94
-10%
724 (529 - 819, n=25)
-12%
211 (12.1 - 832, n=549)
-74%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 AyarlarDeğer
 high30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Dead Trigger 2
 AyarlarDeğer
 high30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Battle Bay
 AyarlarDeğer
 full resolution60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
World of Tanks Blitz
 AyarlarDeğer
 high, 0xAA, 0xAF59 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 AyarlarDeğer
 high HD60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Shadow Fight 3
 AyarlarDeğer
 high60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Maksimum yük
 35.8 °C35.7 °C35.4 °C 
 35 °C35.2 °C35.1 °C 
 35 °C34.1 °C34.6 °C 
Maksimum: 35.8 °C
Ortalama: 35.1 °C
32.2 °C36.7 °C37.9 °C
32.4 °C34.4 °C35.1 °C
32.6 °C34.3 °C33.3 °C
Maksimum: 37.9 °C
Ortalama: 34.3 °C
Güç kaynağı  29.2 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.628.22524.928.43124.621.24026.419.35030.829.16323.624.68020.223.310019.927.212517.638.916019.150.620019.149.925017.454.331516.961.540016.860.950015.163.663016.567.980015.67010001570.6125015.572.1160015.371.7200015.773.5250015.573.2315015.576.7400015.476.1500015.873.763001677.4800015.872.91000016.169.81250016.164.81600017.357.2SPL27.985.6N164.4median 16Samsung Galaxy S9 Plusmedian 69.8Delta0.68.935.246.432.941.937.237.731.736.839.640.528.330.327.330.326.928.126.732.2244520.952.120.957.119.558.518.562.617.570.917.574.715.778.515.876.916.676.215.873.415.473.615.575.51679.915.880.11676.516.37416.374.916.271.416.458.216.44228.688.41.176.2median 16.4Google Pixel 2 XLmedian 73.42.110.539.638.233.633.131.232.130.832.130.734.3343530.939.428.736.426.247.92651.925.354.82557.223.359.622.362.521.164.820.167.719.568.120.166.219.669.318.8731874.817.877.317.67617.675.517.773.517.873.81871.417.765.417.853.517.848.531.285.31.661.7median 19.5Apple iPhone Xmedian 66.23.29.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0 / 0.09 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 0.68 / 0.95 / 1.09 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 4.58 / 5.16 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
HTC U11 Plus
3930 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Power Consumption
-6%
-59%
-67%
-22%
-21%
-33%
-22%
Idle Minimum *
0.68
0.68
-0%
1.28
-88%
1.03
-51%
0.85
-25%
0.72
-6%
0.51
25%
0.58
15%
Idle Average *
0.95
1.13
-19%
1.87
-97%
2.4
-153%
1.15
-21%
1.37
-44%
1.62
-71%
1.44
-52%
Idle Maximum *
1.09
1.16
-6%
1.89
-73%
2.6
-139%
1.23
-13%
1.41
-29%
1.87
-72%
1.53
-40%
Load Average *
4.58
4.69
-2%
3.73
19%
2.96
35%
4.12
10%
3.46
24%
3.92
14%
3.17
31%
Load Maximum *
5.16
5.24
-2%
8.08
-57%
6.6
-28%
8.42
-63%
7.83
-52%
8.27
-60%
8.54
-66%

* ... smaller is better

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
22h 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
8h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 14min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
3h 57min
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
2730 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
21%
17%
-7%
48%
24%
23%
32%
Reader / Idle
1343
1565
17%
1706
27%
1292
-4%
1744
30%
1754
31%
1630
21%
1914
43%
H.264
674
742
10%
672
0%
634
-6%
929
38%
799
19%
811
20%
822
22%
WiFi v1.3
521
736
41%
581
12%
564
8%
818
57%
718
38%
531
2%
774
49%
Load
237
275
16%
302
27%
180
-24%
398
68%
257
8%
354
49%
267
13%

Artılar

+ Hoş tasarım
+ Harika ekran
+ Hızlı sistem çipi
+ Genişletilebilir depolama alanı
+ LTE
+ Stereo hoparlörler
+ IP67
+ İyi sensör ekipmanı
+ DP, HDMI ve OTG desteği sunan USB 3.1
+ Kablosuz şarj
+ Harika çift kamera
+ Duos modeli ile opsiyonel çift SIM

Eksiler

- Çift VoLTE yok
- Önceki modele göre daha kötü batarya süreleri
- Uzun şarj süresi
- Yoğun kullanımda takılmalar
- Sıvı zararına karşı garanti yok
The Samsung Galaxy S9+ (SM-G965F) in review, courtesy of Samsung Germany.
The Samsung Galaxy S9+ (SM-G965F) in review, courtesy of Samsung Germany.

Galaxy S9 Plus ile Samsung yine harika bir akıllı telefon sunuyor, ancak alışıldığı üzere yine ufak iyileştirmeler sunarken inovatif fikirler gözükmüyor. Ana kameralar günlük hayatta çok iyi sonuçlar veriyor. Süper yavaş modu ışık durumuna bağlı olmakla beraber farklı sonuçlar ortaya koyabiliyor. AR emojiler için de çok iyi çalışıyor denemez. 

Bunları kenara bırakacak olursak Koreli firma harika bir ürün sunuyor. Hızlı işlemci, harika ekran, parmak izi okuyucu için daha iyi bir yer, genişletilebilir depolama alanı, iyi hoparlörler, su ve toza karşı dayanıklılık gibi avantajlar. Çift SIM seçeneği bilr mevcut.

Ancak konu batarya kullanım süresi olduğunda cihaz önceki versiyonun gerisinde kalıyor. Hızlı şarj özelliği de aslında çok iyi çalışıyor denemez. Tam dolum için 4 saatten fazla geçmesi gerekti. Bu noktaların kesinlikle elden geçmesi gerektiği aşikar.

Hali hazırda Galaxy S8 Plus kullanıyorsanız, yeni cihazı edinmeniz için bir sebep gözükmüyor.

Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus - 03/26/2018 v6
Daniel Schmidt

İşcilik
92%
Klavye
70 / 75 → 94%
Mouse
98%
Bağlanılabilirlik
66 / 60 → 100%
Ağırlık
89%
Batarya
92%
Görüntü
91%
Oyun performansı
66 / 63 → 100%
Uygulama performansı
68 / 70 → 97%
Isınma
94%
Ses
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Camera
95%
Ortalama
84%
91%
Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare