Notebookcheck

Kısa inceleme: Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Laptop

J. Simon Leitner, 11/06/2017

Kim icat etti? Apple tasarım dilinin diğer üreticiler tarafından uygulanması artık bir gelenek haline geldi. Özellikle çinli üreticiler için bu bir gelenekten fazlası. Mi Notebook Pro ile Xiami, Apple'ın Macbook Pro tasarımını en azından görüntü bakımından takip ediyor diyebiliriz. 1000 Euronun altındaki fiyat etiketi ile quad-core işlemcisi, harici grafik kartı ve tatmin edici aluminyum kasası ile ilgi çekici bir paket. Peki dış görünüşünün altında ne var?

Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 (Mi Notebook Seri)
İşlemci
Intel Core i5-8250U
Grafik kartı
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030) - 2048 MB, Çekirdek: 1252 MHz, Bellek: 5010 MHz, GDDR5, 388.00, Optimus
Bellek
16384 MB 
, DDR4 2400MHz
Görüntü
15.6 inç 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, no, BOE0747 NV156FHM-N61, IPS LED, parlak: evet
Anakart
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Harddisk
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, 256 GB SSD
Ses kartı
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Bağlantılar
4 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm headphone combo port, Kart okuyucular: SD-card reader (SD/SDHC/SDXC) , 1 Parmak izi okuyucu
Network
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 15 x 360 x 244
Batarya
60 Wh, 8000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 1MP camera 1280×720
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: dual speaker, Harman Infinity customized, 2x 2.5 W, Klavye: chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, USB Type-C charger, 12 Ay Garanti
Released
10/01/2017
Ağırlık
1.95 kg, Güç kaynağı: 200 g
Fiyat
900 Euro

 

Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac
949 MBit/s ∼100% +62%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
648 MBit/s ∼68% +11%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
594 MBit/s ∼63% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
585 MBit/s ∼62%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
520 MBit/s ∼55% -11%
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
409 MBit/s ∼43% -30%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac
845 MBit/s ∼100% +79%
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
661 MBit/s ∼78% +40%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
644 MBit/s ∼76% +37%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
529 MBit/s ∼63% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
471 MBit/s ∼56%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
377 MBit/s ∼45% -20%
293
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
292
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1 Display
Maksimum: 298 cd/m² Ortalama: 287.9 cd/m² Minimum: 5.9 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 89 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 277 cd/m²
Kontrast: 925:1 (Siyah: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3 | - Ø
86.86% sRGB (Argyll) 56.83% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.1
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
BOE0747 NV156FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
APPA031, , 2880x1800, 15.4
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
CMN15E8 (N156HCE-EN1), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
3840x2160, 15.6
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
APPA027, , 2304x1440, 12
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T
INNOLUX N156HGA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Huawei MateBook X
Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 2160x1440, 13.3
Response Times
149%
19%
-44%
12%
28%
30%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47.9 (22.4, 25.5)
48 (23.6, 24.4)
-0%
38.8 (20.4, 18.4)
19%
57.2 (27.2, 30)
-19%
41.2 (15.6, 25.6)
14%
44 (25, 19)
8%
33 (15, 18)
31%
Response Time Black / White *
33.7 (19.2, 14.5)
33.8 (19.6, 14.2)
-0%
27.2 (14.8, 12.4)
19%
39.2 (23.6, 15.6)
-16%
30.4 (6.8, 23.6)
10%
13 (10, 3)
61%
24 (12, 12)
29%
PWM Frequency
21800 (99)
119000 (80, 210)
446%
25910 (20)
19%
961.5
-96%
25000 (30)
15%
Screen
29%
-5%
1%
12%
-36%
14%
Brightness
288
523
82%
313
9%
356
24%
358
24%
224
-22%
395
37%
Brightness Distribution
89
86
-3%
83
-7%
87
-2%
88
-1%
85
-4%
88
-1%
Black Level *
0.32
0.44
-38%
0.27
16%
0.37
-16%
0.47
-47%
0.48
-50%
0.45
-41%
Contrast
925
1239
34%
1241
34%
1000
8%
823
-11%
515
-44%
907
-2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.3
1.6
63%
4.7
-9%
5.3
-23%
1.6
63%
5.39
-25%
1.55
64%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3
1.9
37%
5.8
-93%
4.6
-53%
1
67%
5.25
-75%
1.91
36%
Gamma
2.1 114%
2.26 106%
2.06 117%
2.31 104%
2.26 106%
2.48 97%
2.34 103%
CCT
7100 92%
6834 95%
6518 100%
6284 103%
6680 97%
7609 85%
6491 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
56.83
58.7
3%
88.3
55%
61.6
8%
38
-33%
61
7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86.86
90.1
4%
100
15%
82.2
-5%
60
-31%
96
11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
89% / 69%
7% / 1%
-22% / -11%
12% / 12%
-4% / -18%
22% / 17%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.2 ms rise
↘ 14.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.4 ms rise
↘ 25.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 21800 Hz99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 21800 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 21800 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8604 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel Core i7-8550U
170 Points ∼100% +17%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-8550U
Intel Core i7-8550U
164 Points ∼96% +13%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
157 Points ∼92% +8%
Huawei MateBook D
Intel Core i7-7500U
149 Points ∼88% +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
148 Points ∼87% +2%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 Points ∼85% 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 Points ∼85% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 (min: 144.66) Points ∼85%
Dell XPS 13 9360-4764
Intel Core i7-7500U
142 Points ∼84% -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points ∼100% +28%
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
724 Points ∼99% +26%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
576 (min: 544.28) Points ∼78%
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel Core i7-8550U
576 Points ∼78% 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
Intel Core i5-8250U
560 Points ∼76% -3%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel Core i5-8250U
543 Points ∼74% -6%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel Core i5-8250U
538 (min: 467.61) Points ∼73% -7%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-8550U
Intel Core i7-8550U
521 (min: 508.92) Points ∼71% -10%
Huawei MateBook D
Intel Core i7-7500U
343 Points ∼47% -40%
Dell XPS 13 9360-4764
Intel Core i7-7500U
337 Points ∼46% -41%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
145 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
576 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
93.96 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.62 %
Yardım
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5028 (min: 5001) Points ∼100% +6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
4934 Points ∼98% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4746 Points ∼94%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
4648 Points ∼92% -2%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
4422 Points ∼88% -7%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4207 (min: 4206) Points ∼100% +12%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
4054 Points ∼96% +8%
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3833 Points ∼91% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3766 Points ∼90%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
3588 Points ∼85% -5%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3766 puan
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5354 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4746 puan
Yardım
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Apple SSD SM0256L
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T
Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CrystalDiskMark 5.2
16%
40%
-53%
32%
Write 4K
150
86.72
-42%
187.02
25%
82.77
-45%
142.1
-5%
Read 4K
36
23.33
-35%
48.96
36%
25.89
-28%
44.19
23%
Write Seq
1057
1473.23
39%
1378.45
30%
413.3
-61%
1112
5%
Read Seq
1074
1571.73
46%
1877.57
75%
493.8
-54%
1884
75%
Write 4K Q32T1
429
470.54
10%
515.99
20%
245.1
-43%
747.3
74%
Read 4K Q32T1
441
572.52
30%
583.14
32%
213.5
-52%
446.8
1%
Write Seq Q32T1
1283
1546
20%
1586.6
24%
430.7
-66%
1255
-2%
Read Seq Q32T1
1838
2993.4
63%
3266.5
78%
525.2
-71%
3400
85%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1260 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1241 MB/s
512K Read: 1039 MB/s
512K Write: 827 MB/s
4K Read: 60 MB/s
4K Write: 154 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 526 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 435 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade (2017)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
13870 Points ∼100% +226%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7461 (min: 7273) Points ∼54% +75%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
AMD Radeon Pro 555, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5185 Points ∼37% +22%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), Intel Core i5-8250U
4252 Points ∼31%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2849 Points ∼21% -33%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, Intel Core i5-7360U
2379 (min: 2355) Points ∼17% -44%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-8550U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1675 Points ∼12% -61%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1653 Points ∼12% -61%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade (2017)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
10853 Points ∼100% +233%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6074 Points ∼56% +86%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6032 (min: 6004) Points ∼56% +85%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
AMD Radeon Pro 555, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
3721 Points ∼34% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), Intel Core i5-8250U
3263 Points ∼30%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2340 Points ∼22% -28%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, Intel Core i5-7360U
1541 (min: 1484) Points ∼14% -53%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1124 Points ∼10% -66%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
37128 (min: 36802) Points ∼100% +112%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
31274 Points ∼84% +78%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
AMD Radeon Pro 555, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22624 Points ∼61% +29%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), Intel Core i5-8250U
17552 Points ∼47%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
13362 Points ∼36% -24%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, Intel Core i5-7360U
11495 (min: 10969) Points ∼31% -35%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9499 Points ∼26% -46%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-8550U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
9349 Points ∼25% -47%
3DMark 11 Performance
4521 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
13662 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2954 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score
1084 puan
Yardım

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta
31 / 31 / 32.6 dB
Çalışırken
41.6 / 44.7 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
sessiz
40 dB(A)
duyulabilirlik
50 dB(A)
gürültülü
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm uzaklık)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.940.837.739.841.241.940.32533.435.83332.532.931.932.93131.33231.832.132.330.732.44031.23330.932.330.631.530.95031.231.830.731.129.130.430.96329.53130.53129.532.129.48029.429.930.12827.929.428.610026.727.431.927.630.427.728.412526.327.228.526.827.726.527.816026.526.827.928.127.327.227.320025.726.627.626.526.726.426.325024.324.62624.526.824.725.431523.624.225.624.627.623.42440022.723.530.72431.323.123.850021.122.937.323.93920.823.463020.121.33422.240.520.321.380019.221.628.422.730.519.620.5100018.921.428.821.429.619.220.2125018.621.128.921.532.718.720.9160018.521.128.822.33218.321.2200017.720.828.821.230.818.220.4250017.520.329.921.332.318.120.2315017.519.430.521.233.918.119.5400017.61930.219.732.717.719500017.718.328.718.330.917.518.2630017.71826.417.930.117.518800017.618.12217.82417.717.81000017.817.820.717.82217.717.91250017.817.719.817.620.217.617.81600017.817.821.117.718.617.717.7SPL30.932.641.833.344.831.132.5N1.51.841.951.61.8median 18.6Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5median 21.1median 28.7median 21.5median 30.4median 18.7median 20.5Delta2.32.622.52.33.33hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Maksimum yük
 39.4 °C43.8 °C41.8 °C 
 39.1 °C42.5 °C39.7 °C 
 28.6 °C27.7 °C29.2 °C 
Maksimum: 43.8 °C
Ortalama: 36.9 °C
43.6 °C44.9 °C43.6 °C
31.4 °C36.3 °C32.1 °C
39.8 °C30.8 °C29.7 °C
Maksimum: 44.9 °C
Ortalama: 36.9 °C
Güç kaynağı  58.3 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.2 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.840.940.72533.233.933.93131.231.229.14037.734.734.55039.133.230.76336.131.730.58038.63529.310043.844.128.412556.357.227.61605959.826.620062632625064.365.425.831564.366.124.640064.967.62350069.572.321.763067.169.620.480066.870.719.6100069.574.819125064.970.218.5160059.663.318.1200062.467.117.9250056.159.617.7315054.858.517.7400054.459.417.6500058.262.417.8630063.968.517.5800068.972.817.71000065.469.117.71250062.867.517.71600065.469.517.8SPL76.580.780.931.331.1N41.25252.41.61.6median 63.9Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5median 67.1median 18.5Delta3.44.63.340.638.132.233.332.633.833.739.534.339.629.448.828.652.227.35927.968.126.458.925.46723.967.922.666.123.374.922.875.721.573.42069.620.174.719.476.618.779.81873.318.173.217.874.717.871.817.874.318.17718.37018.272.318.268.318.572.131.5871.676.6median 19.4Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)median 72.32.83.3hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.9 / 1.1 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 3.7 / 7.5 / 8 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 49 / 55.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
7700HQ, Radeon Pro 555, Apple SSD SM0256L, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD, IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 15-7570
8550U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-53%
-61%
-131%
-61%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
3.7
3.4
8%
5.05
-36%
11.9
-222%
4.7
-27%
3.6
3%
Idle Average *
7.5
13.9
-85%
8.2
-9%
17.1
-128%
7.7
-3%
6.7
11%
Idle Maximum *
8
17.6
-120%
12.2
-53%
17.3
-116%
10.9
-36%
9.2
-15%
Load Average *
49
71.1
-45%
82
-67%
94.7
-93%
82
-67%
59
-20%
Load Maximum *
55.2
88.5
-60%
120
-117%
122
-121%
120
-117%
58
-5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50.6
57.9
-14%
93.1
-84%
104.8
-107%
109
-115%

* ... smaller is better

Batarya ömrü
WLAN açıkken v1.3
9h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 32min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
2h 02min
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
8250U, GeForce MX150, 60 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
7700HQ, Radeon Pro 555, 76 Wh
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 73 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 97 Wh
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 47 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 54.5 Wh
Battery Runtime
-21%
-26%
-22%
-37%
-5%
Reader / Idle
1061
831
609
H.264
632
511
-19%
465
-26%
352
-44%
683
8%
WiFi v1.3
597
644
8%
535
-10%
434
-27%
392
-34%
681
14%
Load
122
60
-51%
70
-43%
103
-16%
82
-33%
78
-36%
Witcher 3 ultra
87
68
In the test: Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
In the test: Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5

Xiami Mi Notebook Pro ile şu ana kadar gördüğümüz fazlasıyla pozitif bir izlenim bıraktığı yönünde. Tasarım ve kalite üst seviyede. İyi arayüzler, sağlam bir ekran, beklenen seviyede bir performans ve sorun çıkarmayan emisyon değerleri mevcut. Bunların üzerine iyi bir batarya kullanımı ile de uzun süre idare edilebiliyor. Ama elbette her şey güllük gülistanlık değil.

Önümüzdeki günlerde testlerimize devam edeceğiz. Şimdilik çok fazla sorun yok. SD kart okuyucunun ortalama performansı, Type-C portu üzerinden şarj gibi şeyler gözümüze çarpıyor. Quad-Core ULV işlemcinin GeForce MX150 grafik kartı ile performansı asıl merak ettiğimiz nokta ve oyun oynarken nelerle karşılaşacağımızı detaylı şekilde inceleyip size ulaştıracağız.

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Kısa inceleme: Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Laptop
J. Simon Leitner, 2017-11- 6 (Update: 2017-11- 6)