Notebookcheck

Google Pixel 4a 5G Akıllı Telefon İncelemesi: Ucuza Pixel 5

Better than the flagship? Google Pixel 4a 5G, Pixel 5 için hayatı zorlaştırıyor. Aynı SoC ve aynı kamera sistemine sahip. Ancak 6,2 inçlik daha büyük bir ekrana sahip ve çok daha ucuz.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (Çeviren Aslinur Sarica), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Google'ın Pixel 5, en iyi orta sınıf akıllı telefonlardan biridir. Ancak Google'dan bu fiyat aralığında başka bir cihaz daha var: 6 inçlik Pixel 5 ile aynı anda piyasaya sürülen Pixel 4a 5G özellikle heyecan verici olan her iki akıllı telefonun da çok benzer donanımlarla gelmesi. 630 Euro (~ 743 $) Pixel 5 ve Pixel 4a 5G, aynı orta sınıf SoC (Snapdragon 765G) tarafından desteklenmektedir. Bununla birlikte, 499 Euro (~ 589 $) Pixel 4a 5G önemli ölçüde daha ucuzdur ve daha büyük bir OLED ekrana sahiptir. 6.2 inç Pixel 4a 5G, herhangi bir Pixel akıllı telefon arasında en büyük ekrana sahip. Hem Pixel 5 hem de Pixel 4a 5G aynı çözünürlüğe (2340x1080) sahip bir OLED panele sahiptir.

Google Pixel 4a 5G (Pixel 4 Seri)
İşlemci
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Grafik kartı
Qualcomm Adreno 620
Bellek
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Görüntü
6.20 inç 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 416 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, FHD+, 16 million colours, Always-on display, Gorilla Glass 3, parlak: evet, HDR, 60 Hz
Harddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113.2 GB Boş
Bağlantılar
1 USB 3.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ses çıkışları: 3.5-mm headphone jack, 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: Proximity sensor, Ambient light sensor, Accelerometer, Gyrometer, Magnetometer, Barometer, Spectral and flicker sensor, 2x2 MIMO, aptX, aptX HD, Google Cast, eSIM, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API: full
Network
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) 3G (Bands 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), LTE (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/14/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/29/30/32/38/39/40/41/42/46/48/66/71), 5G (Sub-6 Bands n1/3/5/7/8/28/40/77/78), Head SAR 0,94 W/kg, Body SAR 1,40 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 8.2 x 153.9 x 74
Batarya
3885 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
İşletim sistemi
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix 16 MP Ultrawide (1.0 μm pixel size, ƒ/2.2, 107° field of view) + 12.2 MP dual-pixel (1.4 μm pixel size, Dual Pixel autofocus, Optical + electronic image stabilization, ƒ/1.7, 77° field of view), video recording up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 8 MP (1.12 μm pixel width, ƒ/2.0, , 83° field of view), video recording up to [email protected]
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: Stereo speakers, Klavye: virtual, 18W adapter with USB-PD 2.0, USB-C cable, USB-C to USB-A adapter, SIM Tool, Quick Start Guide, minimum 3 years of OS and security updates​, 24 Ay Garanti, fanless
Ağırlık
168 g, Güç kaynağı: 50 g
Fiyat
486 Euro
Bağlantılar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84 %
12/2020
Google Pixel 4a 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
168 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.20"2340x1080
84 %
11/2020
Google Pixel 5
SD 765G, Adreno 620
151 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.00"2340x1080
84 %
10/2020
Google Pixel 4a
SD 730G, Adreno 618
143 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash5.80"2340x1080
84 %
08/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
86 %
06/2020
realme X50 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
205 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.44"2400x1080
83 %
06/2020
Oppo Find X2 Neo
SD 765G, Adreno 620
171 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
83 %
08/2020
OnePlus Nord
SD 765G, Adreno 620
184 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.44"2440x1080

Kasa - İyi bir tasarıma ve delikli kameraya sahip Pixel 4a 5G

Size comparison: The Google Pixel 5 on the left, the Google Pixel 4a 5G on the right
Size comparison: The Google Pixel 5 on the left, the Google Pixel 4a 5G on the right

Mat yüzey, parıltı etkisi yok: Pixel 4a 5G, Pixel 5 ile aynı kısıtlanmış tasarıma sahiptir. Ancak, daha az kaliteli malzeme içerir. Pixel 5, plastikle kaplı alüminyum bir arka yüze sahiptir ve ekranı Gorilla Glass 6 ile korunmaktadır. Öte yandan Pixel 4a 5G, plastik (polikarbonat) bir arka yüze sahiptir ve ekranı daha az dayanıklı Gorilla ile korunmaktadır. Glass 3. Sonuç olarak, 4a 5G çok sert bir his veriyor, çünkü muhafazası bükülemiyor veya bükülemiyor. Pixel 4a 5G, daha pürüzsüz sırtı sayesinde Pixel 5 kadar kaliteli hissetmiyor. Bununla birlikte, yine de çok rahat. elinde tutmak için, çünkü sırt hafif lastiklidir. Bu nedenle, alıcıların Pixel 4a 5G ile isteğe bağlı koruyucu kapağı kullanmaları gerekmiyor. 4a 5G, aslında Pixel 5'inkilerden biraz daha büyük olan küçük çerçevelere sahip. Ve bir de delik açma selfie kamerası var, ekranın sol üst köşesinde bulunan. Arkadan bakıldığında, her iki akıllı telefon da aynı görünüyor: Sol üst köşede, arkadan hafifçe çıkıntı yapan bir çift kamera modülü var. Merkezde biraz daha aşağıda, parmakla kolayca bulunabilen, hafifçe girintili bir parmak izi sensörü vardır. 6,2 inç Pixel 4a 5G (168 g), Pixel 5'ten (151 g) biraz daha ağırdır ve çok hafiftir. bu boyutta bir akıllı telefon. Ancak Pixel 5'ten farklı olarak IP sertifikasına sahip değil. Pixel 4a 5G, Just Black olarak bilinen renk düzeninde gelir.

Boyut Karşılaştırması

163.7 mm 74.8 mm 7.9 mm 192 g158.96 mm 74.24 mm 8.9 mm 205 g159.4 mm 72.4 mm 7.7 mm 171 g158.3 mm 73.3 mm 8.2 mm 184 g153.9 mm 74 mm 8.2 mm 168 g144.7 mm 70.4 mm 8 mm 151 g144 mm 69.4 mm 8.2 mm 143 g

Bağlantı - 3,5 mm kulaklık jakıyla Pixel 4a 5G

Pixel 5 gibi, Pixel 4a 5G'de de bir USB-C bağlantı noktası ve bir Nano SIM kart yuvası var. Ancak Pixel 4a 5G'de 3,5 mm kulaklık jakı da bulunuyor. Her iki akıllı telefon da 128 GB genişletilemeyen depolama alanına sahip. Pixel 4a 5G ayrıca stereo hoparlörler sunar. Ancak, üst hoparlörü ekranın altında yer almıyor. Google, Pixel 4a 5G ile yalnızca 6 GB LPDDR4x RAM (Pixel 5 8 GB RAM'e sahiptir) vererek, ekranın üst kısmında küçük bir ızgaranın arkasına gizlenmiştir, bu da çok fazla kullanıldığında farkedilebilir hale gelebilir. aynı anda uygulamalar.

Left side: Nano SIM card slot
Left side: Nano SIM card slot
Right side: Power button, volume rocker
Right side: Power button, volume rocker
Top: 3.5-mm headphone jack, microphone
Top: 3.5-mm headphone jack, microphone
Bottom: speaker, USB-C port, microphone
Bottom: speaker, USB-C port, microphone

Yazılım - Android 11 ve en az 3 yıllık yazılım desteği sözü

Pixel 4a 5G, Android'in en son sürümü olan Android 11'i çalıştırıyor. İşletim sistemi, tıpkı akıllı telefon tasarımının kendisi gibi temiz ve yenidir, çünkü Google, herhangi bir üçüncü taraf veya "tanıtılan" uygulamayı onunla birlikte paketlememeyi seçmiştir. Android 11 yepyeni olduğu için güvenlik yamaları güncel (5 Ekim 2020). Pixel akıllı telefon, birkaç yıldan daha uzun süre dayanacak bir akıllı telefon satın almak isteyen herkes için düşünülmeye değer. Google, en az 3 yıl işletim sistemi ve güvenlik güncellemeleri vaat ediyor. Bu, Ekim 2020'nin ortalarında piyasaya sürülen Pixel 4a 5G'nin en az Ekim 2023'e kadar desteklenmesi gerektiği anlamına geliyor.

İletişim

Pixel 5 gibi Pixel 4a 5G, Wi-Fi'nin en son sürümü olmayan NFC, Bluetooth 5.0 ve Wi-Fi 5'i (802.11ac) destekler. Referans sınıfı yönlendiricimiz Netgear Nighthawk AX12 ile yapılan Wi-Fi testinde, Pixel 4a 5G hala çok iyi hızlara ulaşmayı başardı.Hem Pixel 5 hem de Pixel 4a 5G benzer indirme hızlarına sahip. Bununla birlikte, yükleme hızları (300 Mb / s) söz konusu olduğunda, Pixel 4a 5G orta sınıf rekabetin önemli ölçüde gerisinde kalıyor. Bununla birlikte, büyük şemada 300 Mb / sn'nin hala çok iyi bir sonuç olduğunu akılda tutmakta fayda var.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
914 (888min - 928max) MBit/s ∼100% +52%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (664min - 686max) MBit/s ∼74% +12%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
668 (592min - 685max) MBit/s ∼73% +11%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (563min - 668max) MBit/s ∼71% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (545min - 662max) MBit/s ∼69% +4%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
625 (521min - 652max) MBit/s ∼68% +4%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
603 (517min - 635max) MBit/s ∼66%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=302, last 2 years)
386 MBit/s ∼42% -36%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
849 (414min - 930max) MBit/s ∼100% +183%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 (618min - 677max) MBit/s ∼79% +123%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (294min - 639max) MBit/s ∼74% +109%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
620 (560min - 703max) MBit/s ∼73% +107%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
563 (275min - 666max) MBit/s ∼66% +88%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
483 (479min - 493max) MBit/s ∼57% +61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=302, last 2 years)
372 MBit/s ∼44% +24%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
300 (211min - 318max) MBit/s ∼35%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630578567593583575628576594614614606607635600603623517631620616586627624599608606579607614628578567593583575628576594614614606607635600603623517631620616586627624599608606579607614628299304314306304304311301306308298302318307314305318305314309304313290300312301299311221211Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø602 (517-635)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø300 (211-318)
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test outdoors
GPS Test outdoors

Coğrafi konum için Pixel 4a 5G, şu küresel navigasyon uydu sistemlerine dayanır: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo ve QZSS. Hem açık havada hem de kapalı alanda, Google akıllı telefon uydularla hızlı bir şekilde bağlantı kurar ve yaklaşık 3 metrelik (~ 10 ft) genel bir hata payına sahiptir. Pixel 4a 5G ayrıca 12 km ~ (7,5 mil) bisiklet sürmek. Burada, bu yolculukta yanımıza aldığımız profesyonel navigatörümüz Garmin Edge 500 kadar iyi performans gösteriyor.

Google Pixel 4a 5G: Route overview
Google Pixel 4a 5G: Route overview
Google Pixel 4a 5G: Pond
Google Pixel 4a 5G: Pond
Google Pixel 4a 5G: Turning around
Google Pixel 4a 5G: Turning around
Garmin Edge 500: Route overview
Garmin Edge 500: Route overview
Garmin Edge 500: Pond
Garmin Edge 500: Pond
Garmin Edge 500: Turning around
Garmin Edge 500: Turning around

Telefonculuk

Kullanıcılar Pixel 4a 5G'ye bir Nano SIM kart takabilir. Hem VoLTE hem de WiFi Arama desteklenmektedir. Alıcılar fiziksel SIM karta ek olarak bir eSIM kart da kullanabilir. Ancak çift SIM modunda yalnızca 4G desteklenir. 5G kullanmak için, alıcıların bu tür ağlarda çalışamayan SIM kartı devre dışı bırakmaları gerekir. Pixel 4a 5G, Pixel 5'ten daha az 5G frekans bandını destekler. Pixel 4a 5G şu bantları destekler: 1, 3, 5, 7 , 8, 28, 40, 77 ve 78, Pixel 5 ise tüm bu bantları destekler: 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 28, 41, 66, 71 77 ve 78.Ancak arama kalitesi Pixel 5'e kıyasla daha iyidir. Bunun nedeni, Pixel 5'in kulak hoparlörünün ekranın altında yer alırken, Pixel 4a 5G'nin kulak-hoparlörü ekranın üst kısmında küçük bir ızgaranın arkasında yer almasıdır. Özellikler sayfasına göre Pixel 4a 5G'nin SAR değerleri 0,94 W / kg (kafa) ve 1,4 W / kg (gövde). Pixel 5, çok benzer SAR değerlerine sahiptir. Ancak bunlar, bir akıllı telefonda gördüğümüz en düşük spesifik emilim oranları değil.

Kameralar - Pixel 5'teki ile aynı çift kamera sistemi

Shot taken with the main camera
Shot taken with the main camera
Shot taken with the front-facing camera
Shot taken with the front-facing camera

Hem Pixel 5 hem de Pixel 4a 5G aynı kamera sistemine sahiptir. Çift piksel otomatik odaklamayı destekleyen ve hem elektronik hem de optik görüntü sabitleme sunan 12,2 MP ana sensöre (Sony IMX363) sahiptirler. 107 ° FOV ile 16 MP ultra geniş açılı lens de vardır. Ön tarafta 8 MP sabit odaklı bir selfie kamerası var.Kamera donanımı ve yazılımı hakkında daha fazla bilgi edinmek için Google Pixel 5 incelememize gidin. Aynı donanım aynı harika sonuçlar anlamına geliyor: görüntüler biraz bulanık, Pixel 4a 5G ile çekilen gün ışığı fotoğrafları doğal renkleri, mükemmel dinamik aralığı ve keskinliği ile etkileyicidir. Google akıllı telefon, gece veya düşük ışık koşullarında bile çok güzel fotoğraflar üretir.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photography 1Daylight photography 2Wide-angle5X zoomLowlight photography

Laboratuvarımızda Pixel 4a 5G'nin kamera performansına daha da yakından bakıyoruz. Simüle edilmiş düşük ışık koşullarında (renk tablosunun en üstteki fotoğrafına bakın), renkler biraz fazla parlaklaşır. Bu, ince ayrıntıların tanınmasını kolaylaştırır. Simüle edilmiş gün ışığı koşullarında (renk tablosunun alttaki fotoğrafına bakın), Pixel 4a 5G tüm renkleri aslına uygun şekilde yakalamayı başarır. Test tablomuzun fotoğrafındaki köşeler bulanık, ancak görüntünün geri kalanı çok keskindir.

ColorChecker
27.6 ∆E
50.3 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
41 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
50.3 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
60.1 ∆E
61.4 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
48.5 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
68.7 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
46.5 ∆E
75 ∆E
67.7 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 4a 5G: 43.7 ∆E min: 14.06 - max: 74.99 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
1 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 4a 5G: 6.85 ∆E min: 0.95 - max: 16.94 ∆E

Aksesuarlar

Pixel 4a 5G'nin kutusu, modüler bir 18 watt şarj cihazı (USB-C), bir USB kablosu (Tip-C'den Tip-C'ye), bir OTG adaptörü, bir SIM kart çıkarma aracı ve ayrıca bir hızlı başlangıç kılavuzu içerir. Kullanıcılar, Google Store'dan kulaklıklar, koruyucu kılıflar veya adaptörler gibi daha fazla aksesuar satın alabilir. Google Pixel 4a 5G, 24 ay garantilidir.

Giriş cihazları

Pixel 4a 5G, sekiz çekirdekli SoC (Snapdragon 765G) ve 6 GB LPDDR4x RAM sayesinde çok duyarlı hissediyor. Arkadaki parmak izi sensörü de cihazın kilidini çok güvenilir ve hızlı bir şekilde açar.Güç kullanıcıları, OLED ekranın Pixel 5'te 90 Hz'nin aksine 60 Hz'de yenilendiğini fark edebilir. Bu, uygulamalar arasında kaydırma veya geçiş yapmanın olmayacağı anlamına gelir. Pixel 5'teki kadar pürüzsüz hissedin.

Keyboard in portrait mode
Keyboard in portrait mode
Keyboard in landscape mode
Keyboard in landscape mode

Ekran - Etkileyici renk doğruluğuna sahip parlak OLED panel

Pixel arrangement
Pixel arrangement

Pixel 4a 5G'nin 6,2 inç OLED paneli 2340x1080 piksel çözünürlüğe sahip, bu yüzden ekran çok keskin görünüyor. Ortam ışığı sensörü etkinleştirildiğinde ortalama 670,7 cd / m² parlaklık ölçtük. OLED panelin parlaklığı çok eşit bir şekilde dağıtılır. Ekranın eşit boyutta değişen siyah beyaz karelerden oluşan bir desen gösterdiği APL50 testinde maksimum parlaklık 875 cd / m² ölçtük. Işık sensörü devre dışı bırakıldığında, maksimum parlaklık 441 cd / m²'ye düşer. Ancak, bu parlak OLED ekranın belirgin bir dezavantajı var: PWM titriyor. Pixel 4a 5G'nin OLED paneli, duyarlı bireyleri rahatsız edebilecek şekilde 250 Hz'de titriyor.

651
cd/m²
653
cd/m²
684
cd/m²
663
cd/m²
669
cd/m²
694
cd/m²
662
cd/m²
669
cd/m²
691
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 694 cd/m² Ortalama: 670.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.86 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 94 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 669 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Siyah: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Google Pixel 4a 5G
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.20
Google Pixel 5
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.00
Google Pixel 4a
OLED, 2340x1080, 5.80
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
realme X50 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.44
Oppo Find X2 Neo
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
OnePlus Nord
AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44
Screen
-4%
5%
-20%
-105%
-190%
-60%
Brightness middle
669
635
-5%
705
5%
584
-13%
679
1%
797
19%
529
-21%
Brightness
671
636
-5%
707
5%
583
-13%
690
3%
807
20%
531
-21%
Brightness Distribution
94
97
3%
96
2%
97
3%
97
3%
95
1%
94
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1
0.8
20%
0.9
10%
1.17
-17%
3.2
-220%
5.4
-440%
2.53
-153%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
1.8
2.2
-22%
1.9
-6%
2.95
-64%
6.2
-244%
9.2
-411%
4.52
-151%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
1.7
-13%
1.3
13%
1.7
-13%
4.1
-173%
6.4
-327%
1.7
-13%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
2.26 97%
2.231 99%
2.28 96%
2.27 97%
2.249 98%
CCT
6685 97%
6492 100%
6576 99%
6341 103%
6604 98%
7245 90%
6462 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9704 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Pixel 4a 5G'nin ekranı, Doğal modda renk açısından en doğru olanıdır. Hem gri tonlama hem de renk sapmaları o kadar düşük ki renkler ideal görünüyor. Ayrıca iki mod daha vardır: Uyarlanabilir ve Gelişmiş. Tüm modlarda, OLED ekranın siyah değeri ve kontrast oranı mükemmel.

Colour accuracy (Adaptive mode; colour space: sRGB)
Colour accuracy (Adaptive mode; colour space: sRGB)
Colour accuracy (Natural mode; colour space: sRGB)
Colour accuracy (Natural mode; colour space: sRGB)
Colour space coverage (Adaptive mode; colour space: sRGB)
Colour space coverage (Adaptive mode; colour space: sRGB)
Colour space coverage (Natural mode; colour space: sRGB)
Colour space coverage (Natural mode; colour space: sRGB)
Grayscale tracking (Adaptive mode; colour space: sRGB)
Grayscale tracking (Adaptive mode; colour space: sRGB)
Grayscale tracking (Natural mode; colour space: sRGB)
Grayscale tracking (Natural mode; colour space: sRGB)
Saturation (Adaptive mode; colour space: sRGB)
Saturation (Adaptive mode; colour space: sRGB)
Saturation (Natural mode; colour space: sRGB)
Saturation (Natural mode; colour space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms).

Açık havada Pixel 4a 5G'nin ekranı çok yüksek parlaklığı nedeniyle okunaklı. Ancak, doğrudan güneş ışığında, hemen hemen tüm diğer akıllı telefonlarda olduğu gibi, ekran içeriğini okumak zordur. Bu nedenle, gölgede bir yer bulmanızı veya ekranı doğrudan güneş ışığından korumak için elinizi kullanmanızı öneririz. OLED panelin görüş açıları çok iyidir. Ekstrem görüş açılarında bile ekran içeriğinin tanınması kolaydır. Bununla birlikte, renkler çok dar açılarda değişir, ancak bu okunabilirliği etkilemez.

Outdoor use under an overcast sky
Outdoor use under an overcast sky
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performans - Günlük kullanım için yeterli güce sahip orta sınıf SoC

Pixel 5 gibi, Pixel 4a 5G de mevcut tüm uygulamaları idare edebilen orta menzilli sekiz çekirdekli bir SoC olan Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G'ye sahiptir. Pixel 4a 5G, yalnızca 6 GB LPDDR4x RAM'e sahipken, Pixel 5'te 8 GB RAM bulunuyor.Sentetik kıyaslamalarda Pixel 4a 5G, Pixel 5 ile aynı performans seviyesine ulaşıyor. Ancak, diğerlerinden biraz daha yavaş. aynı SoC'ye sahip akıllı telefonlar. Tıpkı Pixel 5'te olduğu gibi, Google da Pixel 4a 5G'nin performansını kasıtlı olarak sınırlıyor gibi görünüyor.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1631 Points ∼53%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1635 Points ∼53% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1646 Points ∼53% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1908 Points ∼62% +17%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3087 Points ∼100% +89%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1854 Points ∼60% +14%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1966 Points ∼64% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=17)
1781 Points ∼58% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=191, last 2 years)
1902 Points ∼62% +17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
601 Points ∼66%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
598 Points ∼65% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
549 Points ∼60% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
673 Points ∼74% +12%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
915 Points ∼100% +52%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
620 Points ∼68% +3%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
611 Points ∼67% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=17)
603 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=191, last 2 years)
549 Points ∼60% -9%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8319 Points ∼63%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8954 Points ∼68% +8%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8683 Points ∼66% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7786 Points ∼59% -6%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13202 Points ∼100% +59%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8456 Points ∼64% +2%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9427 Points ∼71% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7245 - 9989, n=17)
8308 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=280, last 2 years)
7502 Points ∼57% -10%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
10122 Points ∼51%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
10007 Points ∼51% -1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10200 Points ∼52% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8730 Points ∼44% -14%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
19711 Points ∼100% +95%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9955 Points ∼51% -2%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
10876 Points ∼55% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8687 - 11041, n=16)
9734 Points ∼49% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=258, last 2 years)
9565 Points ∼49% -6%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2978 Points ∼75%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2979 Points ∼75% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2720 Points ∼69% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2893 Points ∼73% -3%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3947 Points ∼100% +33%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2756 Points ∼70% -7%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2867 Points ∼73% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 2979, n=17)
2742 Points ∼69% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=218, last 2 years)
2631 Points ∼67% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2145 Points ∼26%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2364 Points ∼29% +10%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2150 Points ∼26% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3198 Points ∼39% +49%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8263 Points ∼100% +285%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3147 Points ∼38% +47%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3185 Points ∼39% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 3198, n=17)
3053 Points ∼37% +42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=218, last 2 years)
2955 Points ∼36% +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2287 Points ∼34%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2478 Points ∼37% +8%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2255 Points ∼34% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3130 Points ∼47% +37%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6644 Points ∼100% +191%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3065 Points ∼46% +34%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3108 Points ∼47% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2287 - 3130, n=17)
2966 Points ∼45% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=218, last 2 years)
2608 Points ∼39% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3539 Points ∼64%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3530 Points ∼64% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3309 Points ∼60% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3495 Points ∼63% -1%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5523 Points ∼100% +56%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points ∼60% -7%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3544 Points ∼64% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3765, n=17)
3288 Points ∼60% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=281, last 2 years)
2792 Points ∼51% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2814 Points ∼29%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2834 Points ∼30% +1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2467 Points ∼26% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3589 Points ∼38% +28%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9567 Points ∼100% +240%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3569 Points ∼37% +27%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3556 Points ∼37% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2814 - 3592, n=17)
3467 Points ∼36% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12616, n=281, last 2 years)
3205 Points ∼34% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2948 Points ∼36%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2964 Points ∼36% +1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2615 Points ∼32% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3605 Points ∼44% +22%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points ∼100% +178%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3501 Points ∼43% +19%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3553 Points ∼43% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=17)
3413 Points ∼42% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9643, n=281, last 2 years)
2907 Points ∼35% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3563 Points ∼65%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3544 Points ∼65% -1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼61% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3492 Points ∼64% -2%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5478 Points ∼100% +54%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3099 Points ∼57% -13%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3555 Points ∼65% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3651, n=17)
3275 Points ∼60% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=279, last 2 years)
2746 Points ∼50% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4053 Points ∼31%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4036 Points ∼31% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3750 Points ∼29% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5335 Points ∼41% +32%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12895 Points ∼100% +218%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5356 Points ∼42% +32%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5357 Points ∼42% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4036 - 5437, n=17)
5181 Points ∼40% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=281, last 2 years)
4461 Points ∼35% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3933 Points ∼40%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3915 Points ∼40% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points ∼37% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4893 Points ∼49% +24%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9910 Points ∼100% +152%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4621 Points ∼47% +17%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4815 Points ∼49% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=17)
4562 Points ∼46% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=281, last 2 years)
3581 Points ∼36% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3556 Points ∼70%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3547 Points ∼70% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3247 Points ∼64% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3425 Points ∼68% -4%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5068 Points ∼100% +43%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3395 Points ∼67% -5%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3503 Points ∼69% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2964 - 3556, n=17)
3331 Points ∼66% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=275, last 2 years)
2700 Points ∼53% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2048 Points ∼25%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2106 Points ∼25% +3%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2310 Points ∼28% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3321 Points ∼40% +62%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8345 Points ∼100% +307%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points ∼39% +59%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3284 Points ∼39% +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2048 - 3342, n=17)
3137 Points ∼38% +53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=275, last 2 years)
2716 Points ∼33% +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2261 Points ∼31%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2315 Points ∼32% +2%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2468 Points ∼34% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3346 Points ∼46% +48%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7293 Points ∼100% +223%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points ∼45% +46%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3330 Points ∼46% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2261 - 3346, n=17)
3162 Points ∼43% +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=275, last 2 years)
2542 Points ∼35% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3501 Points ∼70%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3529 Points ∼70% +1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3273 Points ∼65% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3452 Points ∼69% -1%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5034 Points ∼100% +44%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points ∼65% -7%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3476 Points ∼69% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3529, n=17)
3237 Points ∼64% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=275, last 2 years)
2662 Points ∼53% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2862 Points ∼25%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2844 Points ∼25% -1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3629 Points ∼31% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5832 Points ∼51% +104%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11533 Points ∼100% +303%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5148 Points ∼45% +80%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5171 Points ∼45% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2844 - 5832, n=17)
4882 Points ∼42% +71%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=275, last 2 years)
3815 Points ∼33% +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2983 Points ∼33%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2972 Points ∼33% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3543 Points ∼40% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4693 Points ∼52% +57%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8947 Points ∼100% +200%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4561 Points ∼51% +53%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4665 Points ∼52% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2972 - 4693, n=17)
4318 Points ∼48% +45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=275, last 2 years)
3232 Points ∼36% +8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
28116 Points ∼83%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
28331 Points ∼84% +1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15527 Points ∼46% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20429 Points ∼60% -27%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
33793 Points ∼100% +20%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19658 Points ∼58% -30%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21016 Points ∼62% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (14891 - 28331, n=17)
20632 Points ∼61% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 59268, n=251, last 2 years)
22244 Points ∼66% -21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
56690 Points ∼39%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
60281 Points ∼41% +6%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53548 Points ∼37% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
69506 Points ∼48% +23%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145603 Points ∼100% +157%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69645 Points ∼48% +23%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69285 Points ∼48% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (56690 - 70216, n=17)
67538 Points ∼46% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=250, last 2 years)
52867 Points ∼36% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
46246 Points ∼55%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48201 Points ∼57% +4%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
34678 Points ∼41% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
45304 Points ∼54% -2%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
83917 Points ∼100% +81%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
44531 Points ∼53% -4%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
45872 Points ∼55% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (38137 - 48201, n=17)
44398 Points ∼53% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=250, last 2 years)
37157 Points ∼44% -20%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼24%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48 fps ∼24% -2%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼41% +71%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
95 fps ∼47% +94%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
204 fps ∼100% +316%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
94 fps ∼46% +92%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
97 fps ∼48% +98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (48 - 97, n=15)
88.7 fps ∼43% +81%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=233, last 2 years)
92.8 fps ∼45% +89%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
43 fps ∼69%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
45 fps ∼72% +5%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps ∼94% +37%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼96% +40%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼96% +40%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
61 fps ∼98% +42%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
60 fps ∼96% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (43 - 86, n=15)
62.5 fps ∼100% +45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=233, last 2 years)
51.4 fps ∼82% +20%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
31 fps ∼25%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
31 fps ∼25% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼33% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼40% +58%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
124 fps ∼100% +300%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
56 fps ∼45% +81%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
55 fps ∼44% +77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (31 - 56, n=15)
51.1 fps ∼41% +65%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=232, last 2 years)
54.2 fps ∼44% +75%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
30 fps ∼50%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
30 fps ∼50% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼63% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼92% +83%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼100% +100%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼83% +67%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼83% +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (30 - 55, n=15)
46.5 fps ∼78% +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=231, last 2 years)
40 fps ∼67% +33%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
22 fps ∼26%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
22 fps ∼26% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼35% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼44% +73%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼100% +291%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼44% +73%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼44% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (22 - 38, n=15)
35.3 fps ∼41% +60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 117, n=229, last 2 years)
37 fps ∼43% +68%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼35%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼35% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
28 fps ∼47% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps ∼55% +57%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼100% +186%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼57% +62%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼57% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (21 - 37, n=15)
31.5 fps ∼53% +50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=229, last 2 years)
31.1 fps ∼52% +48%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.9 fps ∼30%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.8 fps ∼29% -1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼37% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼43% +46%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
30 fps ∼100% +237%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼43% +46%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼43% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.8 - 15, n=17)
12.3 fps ∼41% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=279, last 2 years)
13.2 fps ∼44% +48%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5.5 fps ∼28%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5.3 fps ∼27% -4%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.6 fps ∼33% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼43% +55%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼100% +264%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼43% +55%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼43% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5.3 - 13, n=17)
8.38 fps ∼42% +52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 101, n=278, last 2 years)
9.11 fps ∼46% +66%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
14 fps ∼30%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼28% -7%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼37% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼46% +50%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps ∼100% +229%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼46% +50%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼46% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (13 - 23, n=17)
20.2 fps ∼44% +44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 66, n=280, last 2 years)
19.9 fps ∼43% +42%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼25%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼25% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼34% +38%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼45% +85%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼100% +308%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼45% +85%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼45% +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 24, n=17)
21.6 fps ∼41% +66%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=280, last 2 years)
22.8 fps ∼43% +75%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
12 fps ∼24%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
12 fps ∼24% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼33% +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼41% +75%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼100% +325%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼41% +75%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼41% +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 21, n=15)
19.7 fps ∼39% +64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=228, last 2 years)
22.3 fps ∼44% +86%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
11 fps ∼25%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼30% +18%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼36% +45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼41% +64%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
44 fps ∼100% +300%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼43% +73%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼43% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (11 - 21, n=15)
17.7 fps ∼40% +61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 60, n=228, last 2 years)
19.5 fps ∼44% +77%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
287407 Points ∼48%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
288970 Points ∼49% +1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
269238 Points ∼45% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
318669 Points ∼54% +11%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
593933 Points ∼100% +107%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
326795 Points ∼55% +14%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
332074 Points ∼56% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (285731 - 332305, n=14)
312767 Points ∼53% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=164, last 2 years)
330404 Points ∼56% +15%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1436 Points ∼91%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1428 Points ∼91% -1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1283 Points ∼81% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1462 Points ∼93% +2%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1576 Points ∼100% +10%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1412 Points ∼90% -2%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1441 Points ∼91% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1139 - 1462, n=14)
1372 Points ∼87% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=218, last 2 years)
1192 Points ∼76% -17%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2525 Points ∼22%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2560 Points ∼22% +1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3840 Points ∼33% +52%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5201 Points ∼44% +106%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11688 Points ∼100% +363%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5216 Points ∼45% +107%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5203 Points ∼45% +106%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2525 - 5247, n=14)
4732 Points ∼40% +87%
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 16996, n=218, last 2 years)
4918 Points ∼42% +95%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5046 Points ∼62%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5381 Points ∼66% +7%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4544 Points ∼55% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5683 Points ∼69% +13%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points ∼100% +63%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4856 Points ∼59% -4%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5296 Points ∼65% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4556 - 5683, n=14)
5099 Points ∼62% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 9044, n=218, last 2 years)
3790 Points ∼46% -25%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5997 Points ∼59%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5960 Points ∼59% -1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6796 Points ∼67% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6069 Points ∼60% +1%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10147 Points ∼100% +69%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6685 Points ∼66% +11%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6801 Points ∼67% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5411 - 6936, n=14)
6506 Points ∼64% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=218, last 2 years)
6089 Points ∼60% +2%
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3237 Points ∼52%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3290 Points ∼53% +2%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3512 Points ∼57% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4094 Points ∼66% +26%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6205 Points ∼100% +92%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3931 Points ∼63% +21%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4054 Points ∼65% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3237 - 4094, n=14)
3813 Points ∼61% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (179 - 6959, n=218, last 2 years)
3265 Points ∼53% +1%

İnternette gezinmeye gelince, Snapdragon 765G çok iyi bir iş çıkarıyor. Karmaşık web siteleri bile hızlı bir şekilde yüklenir ve kaydırma her zaman pürüzsüzdür.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
69.54 Points ∼100% +42%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
58.665 Points ∼84% +20%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
50.811 Points ∼73% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.232 Points ∼72% +2%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
49.09 Points ∼71%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
47.798 Points ∼69% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12)
47.7 Points ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (10.9 - 161, n=196, last 2 years)
46 Points ∼66% -6%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
39.325 Points ∼57% -20%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
116.67 Points ∼100% +26%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
94.481 Points ∼81% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
93.643 Points ∼80% +1%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
92.693 Points ∼79%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
88.938 Points ∼76% -4%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
87.731 Points ∼75% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=200, last 2 years)
82.1 Points ∼70% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.9, n=11)
81.1 Points ∼70% -13%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
67.3 runs/min ∼100% +39%
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)
53.6 runs/min ∼80% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.7 runs/min ∼75% +5%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
49.2 runs/min ∼73% +1%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
48.5 runs/min ∼72%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=172, last 2 years)
47.9 runs/min ∼71% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9)
46.1 runs/min ∼68% -5%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
44.2 runs/min ∼66% -9%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
102 Points ∼100% +36%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
101 Points ∼99% +35%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
77 Points ∼75% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
76 Points ∼75% +1%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
75 Points ∼74%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=215, last 2 years)
74.6 Points ∼73% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
74 Points ∼73% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13)
71.5 Points ∼70% -5%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
71 Points ∼70% -5%
Octane V2 - Total Score
realme X50 Pro
23768 Points ∼100% +25%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
19143 Points ∼81% +1%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
19009 Points ∼80%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
18629 Points ∼78% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
18556 Points ∼78% -2%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
17768 Points ∼75% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14)
16671 Points ∼70% -12%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
16523 Points ∼70% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=228, last 2 years)
15570 Points ∼66% -18%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=229, last 2 years)
4739 ms * ∼100% -85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14)
3721 ms * ∼79% -45%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)
2949.9 ms * ∼62% -15%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
2834.8 ms * ∼60% -11%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
2689.4 ms * ∼57% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
2602.2 ms * ∼55% -2%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
2560.6 ms * ∼54%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
2469.8 ms * ∼52% +4%
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
1999.7 ms * ∼42% +22%
realme X50 Pro
0 ms * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

The UFS 2.1 memory of the Pixel 4a 5G performs as well as it is supposed to. Thanks to its very high sequential read rates, the applications start very quickly and loading times are very short. The write speeds are also very good. Unfortunately, the smartphone does not have a microSD card slot.

Google Pixel 4a 5GGoogle Pixel 5Google Pixel 4aXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5Grealme X50 ProOppo Find X2 NeoOnePlus NordAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
-11%
20%
97%
18%
10%
-14%
-19%
Random Write 4KB
186.74
155.87
-17%
187.39
0%
138.47
-26%
251.98
35%
143.8
-23%
104.5
-44%
117 (18.2 - 290, n=76)
-37%
100 (4.31 - 319, n=288, last 2 years)
-46%
Random Read 4KB
168.63
138.93
-18%
162.89
-3%
156.45
-7%
229.38
36%
160.47
-5%
126.7
-25%
145 (92.6 - 239, n=76)
-14%
121 (13.5 - 325, n=288, last 2 years)
-28%
Sequential Write 256KB
228.73
189.99
-17%
246.79
8%
476.87
108%
756.21
231%
454.36
99%
473.1
107%
255 (182 - 511, n=76)
11%
285 (11.9 - 1321, n=288, last 2 years)
25%
Sequential Read 256KB
945.02
851.37
-10%
502.06
-47%
979.54
4%
1756.1
86%
943.1
0%
955.5
1%
784 (427 - 999, n=76)
-17%
681 (41.9 - 2037, n=288, last 2 years)
-28%

Gaming - The Pixel 4a 5G can hit up to 60 FPS

The Adreno 620, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 765G, can handle all the latest titles. However, it may struggle to run some games smoothly on high settings. Nevertheless, as our benchmarks show, which we conducted with the help of Gamebench, the Pixel 4a 5G can easily achieve playable frame rates in our selection of games. It can achieve a stable 30 FPS in PUBG Mobile on the HD preset and 60 FPS in less graphically demanding Armajet.

Armajet
Armajet
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
05101520253035404550556059575859576060596060606059606060605960606060596060606060595860606059606060605960606060596060606059606059605960606060605960606060596060606059606060605860606060596060596059606060605960606060596060606059606060605960606060596060606059606060605960606060596060606059606060605960606060596060606059606060605960606059606060605960595758595760605960606060596060606059606060605960606060605958606060596060606059606060605960606060596060596059606060606059606060605960606060596060606058606060605960605960596060606059606060605960606060596060606059606060605960606060596060606059606060605960606060596060606059606060605960606060596060606059606060596060606059603031303030273230313029303030312831303030302831303030293031303029313030302930313030293031303028303030303030303130293030313030293031293030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030293130293130293130293125303030303030303030293129312930303030303029293130293130303029312931303030303030303030303030303029313029313030302930303129303031303029303030312930Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.55.5: Ø59.7 (57-60)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.0.0: Ø29.9 (25-32)

Emissions - Cool in day-to-day use, but throttles under load

Temperature

Under sustained load, the surface temperatures of the Pixel 4a 5G peaked at 35.1 °C (95.18 °F), which is why it never feels hot. Usually, we use a battery testing utility known as GFXBench to examine how well our review device performs under sustained load. However, because GFXBench does not run on Android 11, we used an application known as Stability instead.

Result: After an hour of stress testing, the Pixel 4a 5G scored about 223000 points in the AnTuTu benchmark. Before the stress test, the result was 287000 points. The smartphone seems to throttle under sustained load. However, because the Pixel 4a 5G is quite powerful, such drops in performance should not be noticeable in day-to-day use.

Maksimum yük
 32.2 °C32.4 °C31.4 °C 
 32.7 °C34.3 °C31.2 °C 
 34.5 °C35.1 °C32.5 °C 
Maksimum: 35.1 °C
Ortalama: 32.9 °C
30.1 °C31.9 °C32 °C
29.3 °C31.8 °C33.3 °C
30.8 °C34.7 °C34.9 °C
Maksimum: 34.9 °C
Ortalama: 32.1 °C
Güç kaynağı  26 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Speakers

Frequency response
Frequency response

Both speakers of the Pixel 4a 5G are quite loud. Moreover, the sound does not become distorted at maximum volume. However, the speakers produce a very thin sound, because the lows are missing and the highs are overrepresented. 

The sound is good enough for listening to music or watching videos. Howbeit, for a better listening experience we recommend using a set of headphones. And here is where the Pixel 4a 5G is able to beat the Pixel 5, which does not feature a 3.5-mm audio jack. Users can also connect wireless headphones to the budget Pixel smartphone. The Pixel 4a 5G supports all current codes (aptX, aptX HD, LDAC).

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.438.72523.334.4312629.94022.636.25034.535.16319.936.18014.736.610014.436.712514.943.116017.853.620018.951.325011.756.431513.964.54001362.350010.367.263010.470.680012.470.4100011.173.2125011.272.1160012.776.6200012.379.5250012.678.7315012.777.7400012.782.6500012.784630013.579.780001475.81000013.570.61250014.972.8160001668SPL24.890.5N0.681median 12.7median 70.6Delta18.630.435.123.336.72641.522.64034.540.719.942.114.740.814.439.714.944.517.853.918.952.811.754.913.958.91359.610.363.410.466.812.471.411.177.911.284.412.782.712.375.112.675.312.778.212.78012.783.213.582.91478.813.57114.9641658.524.891.90.688.5median 12.7median 71110.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 4a 5GGoogle Pixel 5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 4a 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Google Pixel 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Battery Life - Google’s smartphone lasts for a long time

Energy Consumption

The Pixel 4a 5G draws 0.96 watts when idle and 2.95 watts under load, which is why it can be described as very energy efficient. However, it is not as energy-efficient as the Pixel 5. In the settings menu of the top-tier model, users can turn on Adaptive Battery, which can extend battery life by preventing applications running in the background.

The 3885-mAh battery of the Pixel 4a 5G takes almost two hours to fully charge with the included 18-watt power adapter. Unfortunately, the Pixel 4a 5G does not support Qi wireless charging or reverse wireless charging – the Pixel 5 supports both.

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.01 / 0.17 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 0.7 / 0.96 / 0.98 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 2.95 / 5.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Google Pixel 4a 5G
3885 mAh
Google Pixel 5
4080 mAh
Google Pixel 4a
3140 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Neo
4025 mAh
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
10%
4%
-105%
-67%
-57%
-85%
-60%
-65%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.69
1%
0.49
30%
1.5
-114%
1
-43%
0.8
-14%
1.8
-157%
0.965 (0.66 - 1.8, n=15)
-38%
0.915 (0.37 - 2.3, n=246, last 2 years)
-31%
Idle Average *
0.96
0.82
15%
0.96
-0%
2.2
-129%
1.77
-84%
2.21
-130%
2.1
-119%
1.899 (0.82 - 2.55, n=15)
-98%
1.827 (0.82 - 3.94, n=246, last 2 years)
-90%
Idle Maximum *
0.98
0.85
13%
1
-2%
2.9
-196%
1.86
-90%
2.23
-128%
2.3
-135%
2.07 (0.85 - 2.9, n=15)
-111%
2.12 (0.85 - 4.2, n=246, last 2 years)
-116%
Load Average *
2.95
2.73
7%
3.11
-5%
4.4
-49%
4.23
-43%
3.14
-6%
3.4
-15%
3.98 (2.73 - 6.8, n=15)
-35%
4.39 (1.94 - 8.4, n=246, last 2 years)
-49%
Load Maximum *
5.2
4.4
15%
5.23
-1%
7.2
-38%
9.13
-76%
5.44
-5%
5.2
-0%
6.19 (4.4 - 10.3, n=15)
-19%
7.11 (3.06 - 12.3, n=246, last 2 years)
-37%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

The Pixel 4a 5G has a somewhat smaller battery than the Pixel 5. However, the battery capacity of 3885 mAh is still very good. In our battery test, the Pixel 5 achieved a 10% better battery runtime than the Pixel 4a 5G. The cheaper Pixel smartphone lasted 13 hours in our Wi-Fi test and 22 hours in the H.264 video test. These results indicate that the Pixel 4a 5G should last at least one day, and in some cases two days, on a single charge.

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
40h 59min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22h 17min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
5h 41min
Google Pixel 4a 5G
3885 mAh
Google Pixel 5
4080 mAh
Google Pixel 4a
3140 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Neo
4025 mAh
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Battery Runtime
1%
-19%
5%
-26%
-7%
-12%
Reader / Idle
2459
2245
-9%
2270
-8%
1683
-32%
1507
-39%
2003
-19%
H.264
1337
1466
10%
1045
-22%
1403
5%
1029
-23%
1064
-20%
WiFi v1.3
768
808
5%
669
-13%
884
15%
775
1%
712
-7%
869
13%
Load
341
333
-2%
225
-34%
448
31%
194
-43%
261
-23%

Artılar

+ kompakt ve hafif gövde
+ 5G ve NFC
+ Android 11 ve genişletilmiş yazılım desteği
+ hızlı parmak izi sensörü
+ çok iyi kamera
+ parlak OLED ekran
+ çok iyi pil ömrü

Eksiler

- IP sertifikası yok
- genişletilemez bellek
- WiFi yok 6
- ince stereo ses
- kablosuz şarj yok

Verdict - The lower-priced version of the Pixel 5

Google Pixel 4a 5G review. Device provided courtesy of: Google Germany.
Google Pixel 4a 5G review. Device provided courtesy of: Google Germany.

The Pixel 4a 5G is a budget version of the Pixel 5. It offers an impressive price-to-performance ratio. When compared to previous “a” smartphones, it has no weaknesses.

When compared to the Pixel 5, the Pixel 4a 5G has the same exact mid-range SoC, the same exact dual-camera system and a very similar battery life. However, it costs 130 Euros (~$153) less. Moreover, it also features a 3.5-mm headphone jack, which the more premium Pixel 5 does not have. According to Google, the Pixel 4a 5G will receive software and security update for at least the next three years. 

Strong entry: The Google Pixel 4a 5G scores some major points not only with its large OLED display but also with its hardware, which is very similar to that of the flagship Pixel 5 that costs 130 Euros (~$153) more.

Aside from the screen, there are other areas where both Pixel smartphones differ from each other. The Pixel 4a 5G has only 6 GB of RAM, whereas the Pixel 5 has 8 GB of RAM. Moreover, the Pixel 4a 5G supports fewer 5G frequency bands and has a 60-Hz display. The Pixel 5 packs a 90-Hz screen, has an IP certification for dust and water resistance, supports (reverse) wireless charging, is made of more premium materials and feels better in the hand. However, the Pixel 4a 5G offers better call quality.

If you do not need 5G, then the 5.8-inch Pixel 4a is a good alternative to the Pixel 4a 5G: Not considerably slower, OLED screen, good battery life and significantly cheaper (the going price online is about 400 Euros (~$473)). And if you do not need 5G, but still want a high-end smartphone, then the Pixel 4 XL is worth considering. Right now, it costs about as much as the Pixel 4a 5G.

Google Pixel 4a 5G - 11/11/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

İşcilik
80%
Klavye
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
96%
Bağlanılabilirlik
50 / 70 → 71%
Ağırlık
91%
Batarya
91%
Görüntü
90%
Oyun performansı
28 / 64 → 43%
Uygulama performansı
72 / 86 → 84%
Isınma
93%