Notebookcheck

HP Pavilion x360 15 2019 Dönüştürülebilir İnceleme: Bu Yapılandırmayı Satın Alma

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo, 02/24/2020

Way overpriced at $1000. Pavilion serisinin HP'nin giriş seviyesi uygun fiyatlı dizüstü bilgisayar serisi olması bekleniyor. Bununla birlikte, bu özel yapılandırma son derece kötü çünkü yüksek fiyat, düşük uçlu 768p dokunmatik ekranı yansıtmıyor.

HP Pavilion x360 15, HP'den satın alabileceğiniz en ucuz 15,6 inç dönüştürülebilir dizüstü bilgisayardır. Buna rağmen, bazı yapılandırmalar bütçe dizüstü olması gereken için pahalı tarafında olmak 1000 $ USD ulaşabilir. Bugün sahip olduğumuz ünite, perakende satışlarda 1000 $ karşılığında Whiskey Lake-U Core i7-8565U CPU, 12 GB RAM, 512 GB NVMe SSD ve 768p dokunmatik ekrana sahip son derece yapılandırılmış bir SKU'dur. Comet Lake-U CPU'lu daha yeni SKU'lar çevrimiçi bulunabilir, bu da çeşitli satış noktalarının Whiskey Lake-U ünitemizi indirimli fiyatlarla taşıyabileceği anlamına gelir.Doğru rakipler arasında Asus VivoBook Flip 15, Lenovo IdeaPad C340 15, Dell gibi 15,6 inçlik diğer bütçeler bulunur Inspiron 15 3585 ve Acer Spin serisi.Daha fazla HP inceleme: Pavilion Gaming 15Envy x360 15Spectre x360 15EliteBook x360 1040Omen 15

HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
İşlemci
Intel Core i7-8565U
Grafik kartı
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Çekirdek: 300 MHz, Bellek: 1200 MHz, DDR4, 26.20.100.7324
Bellek
12288 MB 
, Dual-Channel, 17-17-17-39, 1200 MHz, 2x SODIMM
Görüntü
15.6 inç 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 100 PPI, 10-point capacitive, BOE076E, TN LED, parlak: evet
Anakart
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Harddisk
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, 512 GB 
Ses kartı
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Bağlantılar
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm combo, Kart okuyucular: SD reader, Alıcılar: Accelerometer
Network
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 20.6 x 359 x 240
Batarya
41 Wh Lithium-Polymer
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: Stereo, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: hayır, HP Smart, Audio Switch, Support Assistant, 12 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
1.93 kg, Güç kaynağı: 252 g
Fiyat
1000 USD
Bağlantılar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
72 %
02/2020
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620
1.9 kg20.6 mm15.6"1366x768
79 %
07/2018
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620
2.3 kg18 mm15.6"1920x1080
83 %
12/2019
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
i5-8265U, GeForce MX230
2 kg20.5 mm15.6"1920x1080
80 %
04/2018
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
R5 2500U, Vega 8
2.1 kg19.6 mm15.6"1920x1080
78 %
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
R3 2300U, Vega 6
1.9 kg20 mm15.6"1920x1080

Durum

2017'de test ettiğimiz son Pavilion x360 15 ile karşılaştırıldığında, bu 2019 modeli daha modern bir görsel tasarım için dar çerçeveler içeriyor. Bununla birlikte, tüm kasa hala plastiktir, yani daha pahalı HP Envy veya Spectre dizüstü bilgisayarların lükslüğünden yoksundur. Avuç içi dayanakları ve klavye güverte, aksi takdirde düz plastik tasarımı desteklemek için sahte bir fırçalanmış alüminyum görünüme sahiptir.Şasinin kenarlarının ve köşelerinin, yanlışlıkla çarpmaların daha iyi adsorbe edilmesi için kalın plastikten yapılmış olması hoşuma gider. Buna rağmen, hem taban hem de kapak, rakip Asus VivoBook Flip veya Lenovo Ideapad C340 15'ten biraz daha sert olmakla birlikte, daha pahalı Spectre x360 15'ten daha belirgin bir şekilde esner ve gıcırdar.

Toplam boyutlar ve ağırlık sırasıyla Envy x360 15, Ideapad C340-15 veya Asus VivoBook Flip 15 gibi alternatiflerden biraz daha küçük ve daha hafiftir. Amiral gemisi HP Spectre x360 15'ten bile daha küçük bir kaplama alanına sahiptir.

Thick plastic rims absorb bumps and bruises well
Thick plastic rims absorb bumps and bruises well
Smooth matte plastic from top to bottom
Smooth matte plastic from top to bottom
Newer and smaller design when compared to the 2017 Pavilion x360 15
Newer and smaller design when compared to the 2017 Pavilion x360 15
Hinges are firm enough to prevent teetering when typing. However, they become a bit weaker when near the 180 degree mark
Hinges are firm enough to prevent teetering when typing. However, they become a bit weaker when near the 180 degree mark
Tablet mode is almost useless because of the limited viewing angles of the TN panel
Tablet mode is almost useless because of the limited viewing angles of the TN panel
Plastic bottom is slightly roughened in texture
Plastic bottom is slightly roughened in texture
380 mm 258 mm 20 mm 1.9 kg364 mm 250 mm 20.5 mm 2 kg364 mm 246 mm 18 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 240 mm 20.6 mm 1.9 kg359.7 mm 248.8 mm 19.6 mm 2.1 kg357 mm 235 mm 17 mm 1.9 kg

Bağlantı

Belki de tesadüf eseri, buradaki port seçenekleri, farklı bir düzenlemede de olsa Lenovo IdeaPad C340-15'teki ile tamamen aynıdır. USB Type-A bağlantı noktaları yalnızca diğer her şey sağ kenardayken sol kenar üzerindedir. Bağlantı noktalarına ulaşmak kolaydır, ancak kalın USB aygıtları veya kabloları bitişik bağlantı noktalarını engelleyebilecek şekilde sıkıca paketlenir.

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD card reader, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 1, HDMI, AC adapter
Right: SD card reader, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 1, HDMI, AC adapter
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: 2x USB 3.1 Gen. 1 Type-A, 3.5 mm combo audio, Lock
Left: 2x USB 3.1 Gen. 1 Type-A, 3.5 mm combo audio, Lock

SD Kart Okuyucu

Tam boyutlu SD kart okuyucu iyi aktarım hızları sunar. UHS-II test kartımızdan masaüstüne 1 GB görüntü taşımak, Dell XPS 15'teki 6 veya 7 saniyeye kıyasla yaklaşık 14 saniye sürer.

Fully inserted SD card
Fully inserted SD card
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
178 MB/s ∼100% +132%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76.7 MB/s ∼43%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
70.6 MB/s ∼40% -8%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
69.4 MB/s ∼39% -10%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
35.5 MB/s ∼20% -54%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
22.7 MB/s ∼13% -70%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
188 MB/s ∼100% +133%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83 MB/s ∼44% +3%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82 MB/s ∼44% +1%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.85 MB/s ∼43%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.3 MB/s ∼20% -54%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25.6 MB/s ∼14% -68%

İletişim

Realtek RTL8822BE, 2x2 802.11ac kablosuz ve entegre Bluetooth 4.2 için standart olarak gelir. Ancak Netgear RAX200 yönlendiricimiz ve 10 Gbit Ethernet sunucumuzla bile, yalnızca 1,73 Gbps teorisinin aksine yalnızca 650 Mbps civarında ortalama aktarım hızlarını kaydedebiliyoruz.

Upgradeable M.2 WLAN module
Upgradeable M.2 WLAN module
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
632 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
630 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
619 (min: 575, max: 635) MBit/s ∼98%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
518 MBit/s ∼82% -16%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
312 (min: 271, max: 329) MBit/s ∼49% -50%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
310 (min: 179, max: 341) MBit/s ∼49% -50%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
755 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
676 MBit/s ∼90% +4%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
670 MBit/s ∼89% +3%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
652 (min: 311, max: 706) MBit/s ∼86%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
309 (min: 262, max: 329) MBit/s ∼41% -53%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
304 (min: 249, max: 336) MBit/s ∼40% -53%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø618 (575-635)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø642 (311-706)

Bakım

Pavilion dizüstü bilgisayarlara servis yapmak genellikle zordur ve Pavilion x360 15 farklı değildir. Alt panel, dördü kauçuk tabanın altına gizlenmiş beş Philips vida ile sabitlenmiştir. Daha sonra, plakayı dizüstü bilgisayarın geri kalanından kenarlar ve köşeler boyunca ayırmak için keskin bir kenar gerekir. 2x SODIMM yuvaları bir alüminyum plaka altında korunurken, kullanıcılar M.2 depolama yuvasına, pile ve WLAN modülüne doğrudan erişebilir.

Difficult serviceability
Difficult serviceability

Aksesuarlar ve Garanti

Kutuda AC adaptörü ve bazı küçük kılavuzlar dışında hiçbir ekstra yoktur. HP, dünyanın en büyük OEM'lerinden biri olduğundan, standart bir yıllık sınırlı garanti birçok ek seçenekle geçerlidir.

Giriş cihazları

Plastik klavye tuşlarının arka ışığı yoktur ve daha pahalı HP Envy veya Spectre serilerindeki tuşlara kıyasla boyutu daha küçüktür. Bireysel anahtarlar daha fazla kıpırdama eğilimi gösterir, yani köşelerinden birine merkezine karşı bir tuşa basarsanız geri bildirim farklıdır. Bu, klavyede istenmeyen bir durumdur çünkü parmağınızın nereye ineceği önemli değil, önemli geri bildirimlerin düzgün olmasını istersiniz. Bununla birlikte, bütçe dizüstü bilgisayarlarında ucuz klavyelere alışıksanız, buradaki Pavilion klavyesi sürpriz olmamalıdır.Klavyenin en iyi kısmı belki de entegre NumPad'dir. Sayı tuşları ana QWERTY tuşları ile aynı boyuttadır, ancak diğer dizüstü bilgisayarların çoğu daha küçük NumPad anahtarlarına sahiptir veya hiç yoktur.

Dokunmatik

Tıklama yüzeyi (11,5 x 6 cm) 2019 Spectre x360 15 (12 x 6 cm) üzerindeki tıklama yüzeyinden biraz daha küçüktür. Aksi takdirde, çok yavaş kayma sırasında biraz yapışkanlık ile pürüzsüz ve güvenilirdir. Entegre fare tuşları, daha önce belirtilen Spectre'den farklı olmayan yumuşak ama sesli bir tıklama ile geri bildirimde de tatmin edicidir. Dikey kaydırma, tıklama yüzeyi yüzeyinin geniş en boy oranı nedeniyle sıkışık hissedilir.

Standard keyboard layout with NumPad
Standard keyboard layout with NumPad
Wide clickpad aspect ratio. The integrated mouse keys could have been firmer
Wide clickpad aspect ratio. The integrated mouse keys could have been firmer
Clatter is on the quiet with relatively soft key feedback
Clatter is on the quiet with relatively soft key feedback
Small Arrow keys are cramped to use
Small Arrow keys are cramped to use

Görüntüle

768p ekran, 2019'da yapılan bir dizüstü bilgisayarda bulabileceğiniz en kötü ekranlardan biri. Korkunç renkler ve 300: 1'in çok düşük kontrast oranı ile 200 nit'in altında loş. Titreşim ışığına duyarlı kullanıcıları etkilemek için darbe genişliği modülasyonu yüzde 99'a kadar tüm parlaklık seviyelerinde mevcuttur. En kötü suçu, metinlerin ve görüntülerin normalde net olduğu parlak bir ekran için bile grenli bir ilk izlenim için sadece 768p'nin düşük doğal çözünürlüğüdür. Yarı iyi bir görsel deneyim arıyorsanız, bunun yerine 1080p panelli diğer dizüstü bilgisayarlarda daha iyi olursunuz. Muhtemelen burada kaydettiğimizden farklı sonuçlar elde edecek olan 1080p panelli SKU'lar mevcuttur.

Low resolution, dim backlight, poor colors, and poor contrast ratio bring down the whole laptop
Low resolution, dim backlight, poor colors, and poor contrast ratio bring down the whole laptop
Expect noticeable glare even on the maximum brightness setting
Expect noticeable glare even on the maximum brightness setting
Webcam is along the top edge of the screen
Webcam is along the top edge of the screen
Narrow side and top bezels
Narrow side and top bezels
Layer of glass is quite thick meaning that the pixels are not as crisp as they normally are for a glossy display
Layer of glass is quite thick meaning that the pixels are not as crisp as they normally are for a glossy display
TN backlight
TN backlight
187.5
cd/m²
189.2
cd/m²
186.6
cd/m²
189
cd/m²
195.7
cd/m²
189.3
cd/m²
172.9
cd/m²
184.6
cd/m²
180.1
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
BOE076E
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 195.7 cd/m² Ortalama: 186.1 cd/m² Minimum: 14.15 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 88 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 195.7 cd/m²
Kontrast: 288:1 (Siyah: 0.68 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.99 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 4.63
ΔE Greyscale 12.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
57.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 36.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
BOE076E, TN LED, 15.6, 1366x768
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
AU Optronics B156HAN02.1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
BOE CQ NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
Chi Mei CM15E9, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
BOE0802, TN, 15.6, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
LQ156M1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
-25%
-53%
792%
-3%
-27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
68.8 (30, 38.8)
44 (22, 22)
36%
57 (26, 31)
17%
40 (22, 18)
42%
39 (20, 19)
43%
52.8 (25.6, 27.2)
23%
Response Time Black / White *
15.6 (9.2, 6.4)
29 (15, 14)
-86%
33 (19, 14)
-112%
26 (14, 12)
-67%
12 (7, 5)
23%
32 (16.4, 15.6)
-105%
PWM Frequency
1000 (99)
352 (90)
-65%
25000 (30)
2400%
250 (90)
-75%
1020 (25)
2%
Screen
71%
64%
81%
13%
118%
Brightness middle
195.7
229
17%
266
36%
221
13%
225
15%
588
200%
Brightness
186
221
19%
251
35%
207
11%
213
15%
555
198%
Brightness Distribution
88
76
-14%
81
-8%
87
-1%
88
0%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.68
0.15
78%
0.165
76%
0.15
78%
0.535
21%
0.4
41%
Contrast
288
1527
430%
1612
460%
1473
411%
421
46%
1470
410%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
11.99
5.03
58%
6.33
47%
4.35
64%
10.37
14%
2.5
79%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
21.31
8.89
58%
21.03
1%
8.98
58%
19.75
7%
6.3
70%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.63
5.23
-13%
3.89
16%
0.6
87%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
12.8
5.56
57%
3.81
70%
3.09
76%
12.09
6%
4.5
65%
Gamma
2.15 102%
2.64 83%
2.38 92%
2.23 99%
2.72 81%
2.2 100%
CCT
14252 46%
7015 93%
6057 107%
6068 107%
13335 49%
6836 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.7
37
1%
37
1%
56
53%
37
1%
63.2
72%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57.8
59
2%
57
-1%
86
49%
59
2%
98
70%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
23% / 55%
6% / 39%
437% / 245%
5% / 10%
46% / 87%

* ... smaller is better

Renk alanı, bütçe panelini göstermek için sırasıyla AdobeRGB ve sRGB'nin sadece yüzde 37'sinde ve yüzde 58'inde dar. Bu sonuçlar, yukarıdaki sığ renkler hakkındaki öznel analizimizi doğrulamaktadır. Buna karşılık, neredeyse tüm üst düzey Ultrabook'lardaki ekranlar daha derin ve daha doğru renkler için tipik olarak sRGB'nin yüzde 90'ından fazlasını kaplar.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Şaşırtıcı olmayan bir şekilde, bir X-Rite kolorimetresi ile yapılan diğer ölçümler çok yanlış bir paneli ortaya çıkarır. Renk sıcaklığı çok soğuk ve bu nedenle renkler özellikle düşük doygunluk seviyelerinde çok kapalı. Panel kendimiz kalibre edildikten sonra renkler önemli ölçüde gelişir, ancak bu tür sınırlı siyah seviyeleri ve renk üretimi ile çok şey yapabilirsiniz.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 6.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
68.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 30 ms rise
↘ 38.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1000 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17159 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Dış mekan görünürlüğü ortalamanın çok altında. Loş bir arka ışık, parlak ekran ve zayıf TN görüntüleme açılarının kombinasyonu, gölgede bile hoş olmayan bir deneyim sağlar. 2'si 1 arada form faktörü nedeniyle bu özel dönüştürülebilir mekanı kullanmaya cazip gelebilirsiniz, ancak Pavilion serisi çoğunlukla iç mekan koşulları için tasarlanmıştır.

Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under sunlight
Narrow TN viewing angles
Narrow TN viewing angles

Verim

Tüm SKU'lar U sınıfı Core i3 - Core i7 CPU'larla birlikte gelir ve bazıları Radeon 535 grafikleriyle bile yapılandırılabilir. Bununla birlikte, genel performans hafif ila hafif-orta iş yüklerini ve web'de gezinme ve video akışı gibi çoklu görevleri hedefler. Aynı Core i7-8565U CPU'nun, kabaca benzer bir işlemci performansı düzeyi için HP'nin üst düzey Spectre serisinde de bulunabileceğini unutmayın.LatencyMon, kablosuz etkinleştirildiğinde bile DPC gecikme sorunlarını gösterir. RAM, iki SODIMM yuvasında 16 GB'a kadar genişletilebilir.

İşlemci

Ham çok iş parçacığı performansı, aynı işlemciye sahip diğer 50 dizüstü bilgisayardan alınan veritabanımızdaki ortalama Core i7-8565U'dan yaklaşık yüzde 9 ila 16 daha yavaştır. Spectre x360 13'teki i7-8565U, Pavilion'umuzdan daha hızlı çalışır. Açı, Pavilion Cabrio'daki CPU'nun neredeyse yok olan Turbo Boost potansiyeline kısmen atfedilebilir. Örneğin, CineBench R15 Multi-Thread'ı bir döngüde çalıştırırken, diğer tüm dizüstü bilgisayarlarda normalde göreceğimiz saat hızında başlangıç artışı olmadan son puanlar çalışma boyunca sabit kalır. Kullanıcılar, eski Kaby Lake ile aynı işlemci performansını bekleyebilirler. -R Core i7-8550U, Dell Latitude 5495'teki Ryzen 7 2700U'dan daha yavaştır.Daha fazla teknik bilgi ve karşılaştırma karşılaştırmaları için Core i7-8565U üzerindeki özel sayfamıza bakın.

CineBench R15
CineBench R15
CineBench R20
CineBench R20
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660Tooltip
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø486 (482.58-488.76)
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø462 (454.47-500.69)
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø565 (559.89-595.69)
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI023T Vega 10, R7 3700U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø497 (487.04-651.58)
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
MSI Modern 15 A10RB
Intel Core i7-10510U
497 Points ∼97% +23%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
460 Points ∼89% +14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
460 Points ∼89% +14%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Intel Core i5-10210U
421 Points ∼82% +4%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
418 Points ∼81% +3%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel Core i7-8565U
405 Points ∼79%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (176 - 472, n=18)
394 Points ∼77% -3%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel Core i7-8550U
383 Points ∼75% -5%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
381 Points ∼74% -6%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel Core i5-8250U
351 Points ∼68% -13%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
334 Points ∼65% -18%
CPU (Multi Core)
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
2410 Points ∼27% +117%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB
Intel Core i7-10510U
1897 Points ∼21% +71%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1799 Points ∼20% +62%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
1737 Points ∼20% +56%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
1499 Points ∼17% +35%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
1392 Points ∼16% +25%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Intel Core i5-10210U
1225 Points ∼14% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (880 - 1645, n=18)
1215 Points ∼14% +9%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel Core i7-8550U
1138 Points ∼13% +3%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel Core i5-8250U
1117 Points ∼13% +1%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel Core i7-8565U
1110 Points ∼13%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI Modern 15 A10RB
Intel Core i7-10510U
202 Points ∼93% +17%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
184 Points ∼84% +7%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
180 Points ∼83% +5%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
173 Points ∼79% +1%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel Core i7-8565U
172 Points ∼79%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Intel Core i5-10210U
170 Points ∼78% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (73.1 - 193, n=50)
170 Points ∼78% -1%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel Core i7-8550U
156 Points ∼72% -9%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
148 Points ∼68% -14%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
147 Points ∼67% -15%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼66% -17%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
135 Points ∼62% -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
1051 Points ∼24% +114%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB
Intel Core i7-10510U
813 Points ∼19% +65%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
797 Points ∼18% +62%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
733 Points ∼17% +49%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
672 Points ∼15% +37%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
670 Points ∼15% +36%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (361 - 815, n=51)
583 Points ∼13% +18%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel Core i5-8250U
554 Points ∼13% +13%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Intel Core i5-10210U
513 Points ∼12% +4%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
501 Points ∼11% +2%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel Core i7-8550U
494 Points ∼11% 0%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel Core i7-8565U
492 Points ∼11%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
2.18 Points ∼89%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (0.65 - 2.16, n=11)
1.811 Points ∼74%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel Core i5-8250U
1.63 Points ∼66%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
1.52 Points ∼62%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
11.81 Points ∼27%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
7.56 Points ∼17%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (4.09 - 7.4, n=11)
6.31 Points ∼14%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel Core i5-8250U
5.56 Points ∼13%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
7345 Points ∼68%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (2682 - 8906, n=16)
6571 Points ∼61%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel Core i7-8550U
6212 Points ∼57%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
31463 Points ∼48%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (3806 - 23118, n=16)
16983 Points ∼26%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel Core i7-8550U
15324 Points ∼23%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (263 - 1897, n=8)
546 s * ∼6%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
171.101 s * ∼2%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (0.295 - 7928, n=57)
1661 Seconds * ∼7%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
523.014 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
172 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
492 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
46.08 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Yardım

Sistem performansı

PCMark sonuçları, aynı Core i7 CPU'ya ve entegre UHD Graphics 620 GPU'ya sahip diğer dizüstü bilgisayarlarla karşılaştırıldığında olmasını beklediğimiz yerdir. Dijital İçerik Oluşturma Puanı özellikle zayıftır, çünkü bu kesinlikle herhangi bir grafik veya düzenleme işi için kullanılacak dizüstü bilgisayar değildir.

PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
GeForce MX230, i5-8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
3337 Points ∼26% +28%
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
3096 Points ∼24% +19%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2264 - 3370, n=21)
2926 Points ∼23% +12%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
Vega 6, R3 2300U, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
2908 Points ∼22% +12%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2848 Points ∼22% +9%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
2801 Points ∼22% +7%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
2608 Points ∼20%
Productivity
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6782 Points ∼65%
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
6771 Points ∼65% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3381 - 7588, n=21)
6707 Points ∼64% -1%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
GeForce MX230, i5-8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
6390 Points ∼61% -6%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
5867 Points ∼56% -13%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3901 Points ∼37% -42%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
Vega 6, R3 2300U, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
3804 Points ∼37% -44%
Essentials
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
9000 Points ∼79% +8%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
GeForce MX230, i5-8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
8799 Points ∼77% +6%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8337 Points ∼73%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5450 - 9029, n=21)
8273 Points ∼72% -1%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
7142 Points ∼62% -14%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6236 Points ∼54% -25%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
Vega 6, R3 2300U, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
5993 Points ∼52% -28%
Score
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
4105 Points ∼51% +8%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
GeForce MX230, i5-8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
4104 Points ∼51% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2486 - 4178, n=21)
3906 Points ∼48% +3%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3787 Points ∼47%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
3510 Points ∼43% -7%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2944 Points ∼36% -22%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
Vega 6, R3 2300U, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
2901 Points ∼36% -23%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5132 Points ∼78%
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5070 Points ∼77% -1%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
GeForce MX230, i5-8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
4837 Points ∼73% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3596 - 5189, n=19)
4762 Points ∼72% -7%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
4689 Points ∼71% -9%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
Vega 6, R3 2300U, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
3915 Points ∼59% -24%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3800 Points ∼58% -26%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
4175 Points ∼69% +25%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
GeForce MX230, i5-8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
3639 Points ∼60% +9%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
3587 Points ∼59% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2577 - 4179, n=20)
3539 Points ∼58% +6%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3462 Points ∼57% +4%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3335 Points ∼55%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
Vega 6, R3 2300U, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
2915 Points ∼48% -13%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3335 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5132 puan
Yardım

Depolama aygıtları

Yalnızca tek bir M.2 2280 depolama yuvası kullanılabilir. Test birimimiz orta sınıf 512 GB Intel 660p PCIe NVMe SSD ile birlikte gelirken, kullanıcılar kapasiteye ve dizüstü bilgisayarın nereden satın alındığına bağlı olarak farklı üreticilerin SSD'lerini bekleyebilirler. Sıralı okuma ve yazma hızları, Samsung PM981 serisinden veya Toshiba XG6 serisinden 1500 veya 2000 MB / s'ye kıyasla 1000 MB / s civarında seyrediyor. Daha fazla karşılaştırma karşılaştırması için HDD ve SSD tablolarımıza bakın.

Just a single storage bay with no secondary options
Just a single storage bay with no secondary options
There is unused space near the bottom right corner that could have housed a 2.5-inch bay
There is unused space near the bottom right corner that could have housed a 2.5-inch bay
AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 5.5
CDM 5.5
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
AS SSD
-60%
-35%
19%
-73%
70%
Copy Game MB/s
910.79
127.14
-86%
216.83
-76%
370.35
-59%
263.42
-71%
1320.4
45%
Copy Program MB/s
606.87
80.81
-87%
158.72
-74%
167.2
-72%
95.57
-84%
565.2
-7%
Copy ISO MB/s
904.85
317.81
-65%
265.76
-71%
700.22
-23%
432.57
-52%
2145.1
137%
Score Total
1655
825
-50%
963
-42%
2488
50%
1489
-10%
3640
120%
Score Write
887
166
-81%
328
-63%
552
-38%
326
-63%
1726
95%
Score Read
506
438
-13%
444
-12%
1314
160%
783
55%
1299
157%
Access Time Write *
0.136
0.088
35%
0.041
70%
0.046
66%
0.234
-72%
0.039
71%
Access Time Read *
0.048
0.13
-171%
0.07
-46%
0.077
-60%
0.33
-588%
0.07
-46%
4K-64 Write
666.86
93.24
-86%
181.88
-73%
338.56
-49%
221.24
-67%
1502.49
125%
4K-64 Read
323.37
364.51
13%
264.28
-18%
1024.83
217%
631.65
95%
1020.22
215%
4K Write
127.5
49.85
-61%
109.2
-14%
81.91
-36%
35.62
-72%
99.71
-22%
4K Read
52.79
26.42
-50%
40
-24%
42.97
-19%
21.87
-59%
43.29
-18%
Seq Write
930.97
229.32
-75%
369.75
-60%
1318.2
42%
687.76
-26%
1235
33%
Seq Read
1300.6
474.75
-63%
1399.02
8%
2464.71
90%
1291.3
-1%
2357
81%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-39%
4%
-39%
32%
Write 4K
179
105
-41%
116
-35%
87.31
-51%
93.61
-48%
Read 4K
58.71
39.72
-32%
42.73
-27%
23.54
-60%
41.87
-29%
Write Seq
973.9
326.9
-66%
1222
25%
823.8
-15%
1697.86
74%
Read Seq
1614
1033
-36%
1608
0%
715.1
-56%
1978.04
23%
Write 4K Q32T1
445.4
269.1
-40%
280.1
-37%
147.8
-67%
383.06
-14%
Read 4K Q32T1
338.7
284.8
-16%
333.6
-2%
256.1
-24%
326.86
-3%
Write Seq Q32T1
985.7
321
-67%
1291
31%
732.6
-26%
2778.1
182%
Read Seq Q32T1
1824
1606
-12%
3183
75%
1525
-16%
3119
71%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-60% / -60%
-37% / -37%
12% / 14%
-56% / -60%
51% / 56%

* ... smaller is better

Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1824 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 985.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 338.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 445.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1614 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 973.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 58.71 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 179 MB/s

GPU Performansı

UHD Graphics 620 bu noktada oldukça eski. Video akışı ve nadiren tarayıcı oyunlarının dışında grafiksel olarak çok fazla şey yapmayı beklemeyin. Harici bir monitörünüz olması koşuluyla 4K30 oynatma sorunsuz çalışır. Daha fazla teknik bilgi ve karşılaştırma karşılaştırmaları için UHD Graphics 620'deki özel sayfamıza bakın.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Ice Storm Extreme
Ice Storm Extreme
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Time Spy
Time Spy
 
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i5-9300H
7846 Points ∼35% +407%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
4532 Points ∼20% +193%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
3707 Points ∼16% +139%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i5-8265U
3693 Points ∼16% +139%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U
3247 Points ∼14% +110%
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
3059 Points ∼14% +98%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, R5 2500U
2683 Points ∼12% +73%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645, i5-8257U
2601 Points ∼12% +68%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000), R3 2300U
2419 Points ∼11% +56%
Dell Vostro 15-5581
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8265U
2169 Points ∼10% +40%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U
2078 Points ∼9% +34%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U
1945 Points ∼9% +26%
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H
1763 Points ∼8% +14%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U
1746 Points ∼8% +13%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (959 - 2142, n=192)
1554 Points ∼7% 0%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
1548 Points ∼7%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U
1537 Points ∼7% -1%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1485 Points ∼7% -4%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i5-9300H
11458 Points ∼22% +551%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
4905 Points ∼10% +179%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U
4165 Points ∼8% +137%
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
4087 Points ∼8% +132%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
3560 Points ∼7% +102%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, R5 2500U
3549 Points ∼7% +102%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i5-8265U
3547 Points ∼7% +102%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U
3080 Points ∼6% +75%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000), R3 2300U
2986 Points ∼6% +70%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645, i5-8257U
2985 Points ∼6% +70%
Dell Vostro 15-5581
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8265U
2476 Points ∼5% +41%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U
1940 Points ∼4% +10%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U
1764 Points ∼3% 0%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
1759 Points ∼3%
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H
1750 Points ∼3% -1%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U
1740 Points ∼3% -1%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 2006, n=192)
1725 Points ∼3% -2%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1597 Points ∼3% -9%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i5-9300H
3004 Points ∼20% +705%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
1160 Points ∼8% +211%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
862 Points ∼6% +131%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U
852 Points ∼6% +128%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i5-8265U
837 Points ∼6% +124%
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
736 Points ∼5% +97%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, R5 2500U
649 Points ∼4% +74%
Dell Vostro 15-5581
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8265U
649 Points ∼4% +74%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645, i5-8257U
550 Points ∼4% +47%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000), R3 2300U
522 Points ∼4% +40%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U
425 Points ∼3% +14%
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H
382 Points ∼3% +2%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U
381 Points ∼3% +2%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
373 Points ∼3%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (299 - 443, n=50)
370 Points ∼3% -1%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
330 Points ∼2% -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i5-9300H
8161 Points ∼20% +647%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
3868 Points ∼10% +254%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U
2999 Points ∼7% +175%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
2874 Points ∼7% +163%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i5-8265U
2755 Points ∼7% +152%
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
2496 Points ∼6% +129%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, R5 2500U
2310 Points ∼6% +112%
Dell Vostro 15-5581
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8265U
2267 Points ∼6% +108%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000), R3 2300U
2064 Points ∼5% +89%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645, i5-8257U
1893 Points ∼5% +73%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U
1835 Points ∼5% +68%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U
1339 Points ∼3% +23%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U
1239 Points ∼3% +13%
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H
1178 Points ∼3% +8%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U
1144 Points ∼3% +5%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1418, n=162)
1136 Points ∼3% +4%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1111 Points ∼3% +2%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
1092 Points ∼3%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i5-9300H
51981 Points ∼27% +473%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
23806 Points ∼12% +162%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U
20784 Points ∼11% +129%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
18633 Points ∼10% +105%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i5-8265U
17256 Points ∼9% +90%
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
16344 Points ∼8% +80%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000), R3 2300U
15850 Points ∼8% +75%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, R5 2500U
15186 Points ∼8% +67%
Dell Vostro 15-5581
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8265U
13240 Points ∼7% +46%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U
10773 Points ∼6% +19%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U
9882 Points ∼5% +9%
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H
9765 Points ∼5% +8%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U
9528 Points ∼5% +5%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U
9324 Points ∼5% +3%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11436, n=180)
9160 Points ∼5% +1%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
9079 Points ∼5%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
8947 Points ∼5% -1%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
MSI Modern 15 A10RB
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
79135 Points ∼11% +91%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U
78094 Points ∼11% +89%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i5-8265U
75636 Points ∼10% +83%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, R5 2500U
68150 Points ∼9% +65%
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
55019 Points ∼8% +33%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
51835 Points ∼7% +25%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (29002 - 59483, n=52)
43398 Points ∼6% +5%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U
42561 Points ∼6% +3%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
41367 Points ∼6%
3DMark 11 Performance
1933 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7819 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1008 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score
427 puan
Yardım
BioShock Infinite
1366x768 Medium Preset
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
117.5 fps ∼100% +285%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
104 fps ∼89% +241%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230
90.6 fps ∼77% +197%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
Intel Core i5-7300HQ, AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
75.34 fps ∼64% +147%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
73 fps ∼62% +139%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
68.3 fps ∼58% +124%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3
Intel Core i5-8257U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
60 fps ∼51% +97%
Dell Vostro 15-5581
Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130
57.3 fps ∼49% +88%
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
52.7 fps ∼45% +73%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
42 fps ∼36% +38%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
37 fps ∼31% +21%
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
34.7 fps ∼30% +14%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
34.3 fps ∼29% +12%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (11.5 - 45.5, n=177)
32.7 fps ∼28% +7%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
30.5 fps ∼26%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
27.6 fps ∼23% -10%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
189.7 fps ∼100% +286%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230
168.1 fps ∼89% +242%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
152.8 fps ∼81% +211%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
123.7 fps ∼65% +152%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
109.6 fps ∼58% +123%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
105.7 fps ∼56% +115%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3
Intel Core i5-8257U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
104.6 fps ∼55% +113%
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
91.3 fps ∼48% +86%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
Intel Core i5-7300HQ, AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
88.56 fps ∼47% +80%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
85.7 fps ∼45% +75%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
85.3 fps ∼45% +74%
Dell Vostro 15-5581
Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130
83.6 fps ∼44% +70%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
68.7 fps ∼36% +40%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (18.3 - 90.2, n=177)
60.7 fps ∼32% +24%
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
59.88 fps ∼32% +22%
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
58.7 fps ∼31% +20%
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
49.9 fps ∼26% +2%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
49.1 fps ∼26%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
30.4 (min: 24) fps ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
Intel Core i5-7300HQ, AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
20.7 fps ∼68%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
11.7 fps ∼38%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
11.5 fps ∼38%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
10 fps ∼33%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230
9.9 fps ∼33%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000)
6 fps ∼20%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2.97 - 5.2, n=6)
3.38 fps ∼11%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
53.2 (min: 44) fps ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
Intel Core i5-7300HQ, AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
35.2 fps ∼66%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
21.5 fps ∼40%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
20.1 fps ∼38%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
18.8 fps ∼35%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230
15.9 fps ∼30%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
10.7 fps ∼20%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000)
7.4 fps ∼14%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4.2 - 8.8, n=13)
5.71 fps ∼11%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
99 (min: 75) fps ∼100% +843%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
38 fps ∼38% +262%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
36.8 fps ∼37% +250%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230
28.4 fps ∼29% +170%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000)
19.6 fps ∼20% +87%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
10.5 fps ∼11%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (8 - 11, n=19)
9.82 fps ∼10% -6%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
146 (min: 109) fps ∼100% +769%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
68.1 fps ∼47% +305%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
56.4 fps ∼39% +236%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
53.8 fps ∼37% +220%
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230
48.4 fps ∼33% +188%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000)
39 fps ∼27% +132%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
33 fps ∼23% +96%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
19.7 fps ∼13% +17%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
16.8 fps ∼12%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (9.59 - 20.7, n=42)
15.5 fps ∼11% -8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1280x720 Lowest Preset
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
56 fps ∼100%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
38 fps ∼68%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
31 fps ∼55%
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000)
18 fps ∼32%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
15 fps ∼27%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (12 - 21.7, n=8)
15 fps ∼27%
düşük orta yüksek ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 49.1 30.5 24.7 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 16.8 10.5 fps
Rocket League (2017) 62.7 fps

Emisyonları

Sistem Gürültüsü

Soğutma çözeltisi tek bir fan ve bir ısı borusundan oluşur. Tamamen sessiz bir deneyim için fan, web'e göz atma veya e-posta gönderme gibi düşük yüklerde boşta kalır. En kötüsü, 3DMark 06'yı yaklaşık 90 saniye çalıştırırken sadece 31,5 dB (A) fan gürültüsü kaydedebiliyoruz. Hem Prime95 hem de FurMark'ı çalıştırmak, 37 dB (A) değerinin biraz üzerinde maksimum fan gürültüsü indükleyecektir, ancak bu aşırı bir durumdur. Genel olarak, Pavilion x360 15, rakiplerinin çoğundan daha sessizdir.Test birimimizde bobin sızlanması veya elektronik gürültü yaşamadık.

Fan noise is quiet and and almost unnoticeable during day-to-day use
Fan noise is quiet and and almost unnoticeable during day-to-day use
Single ~50 mm fan and one heat pipe
Single ~50 mm fan and one heat pipe
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
GeForce MX230, i5-8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
Vega 6, R3 2300U, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Noise
-6%
-8%
-9%
-10%
-3%
off / environment *
28.4
30.2
-6%
30.3
-7%
30.13
-6%
30.6
-8%
29.3
-3%
Idle Minimum *
28.4
30.9
-9%
30.6
-8%
30.13
-6%
30.6
-8%
29.3
-3%
Idle Average *
28.4
30.9
-9%
30.6
-8%
30.13
-6%
30.6
-8%
29.3
-3%
Idle Maximum *
28.4
30.9
-9%
30.6
-8%
30.13
-6%
30.6
-8%
29.8
-5%
Load Average *
31.5
34.2
-9%
36.4
-16%
38.8
-23%
36.7
-17%
32.4
-3%
Load Maximum *
37.4
34.2
9%
36.8
2%
38.8
-4%
41.1
-10%
37.2
1%

* ... smaller is better

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta
28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB
Çalışırken
31.5 / 37.4 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
sessiz
40 dB(A)
duyulabilirlik
50 dB(A)
gürültülü
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm uzaklık)   environment noise: 28.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.243.141.542.42538.23838.140.931384037.639.94038.137.337.138.35037.234.937.137.66337.436.337.139.38034.535.735.83610034.434.93534.912532.733.23333.71603332.133.133.520033.132.13232.925031.93131.932.631531.63131.332.34003130.530.231.550030.23029.43163029.829.529.431.180029.629.229.231.5100029.62928.931.2125029.428.528.431.8160029.728.228.333.7200029.228.328.232.3250029.32828.133.6315028.828.12832.8400028.22827.931.1500027.92827.828.9630027.927.827.628.1800027.827.727.628.21000027.727.727.4281250027.727.627.527.81600027.627.527.327.7SPL41.240.640.543.6N4.1444.8median 29.6median 28.5median 28.4median 31.5Delta1.81.21.21.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl

Sıcaklık

Kısmen nispeten düşük çekirdek sıcaklıkları ve özel bir GPU eksikliği nedeniyle yüzey sıcaklıkları asla rahatsız olmaz. En kötüsü, çok yüksek işlem yükleri çalıştırırken klavye desteğindeki ve altındaki en sıcak noktalar sırasıyla 31 C ve 41 C'ye ulaşabilir. Pavyon, Ryzen 5 2500U ile Envy 15'te kaydettiğimizden daha serin çalışıyor.

Ventilation on left side of laptop
Ventilation on left side of laptop
AC adapter when on maximum load
AC adapter when on maximum load
Maksimum yük
 30 °C31.6 °C28.4 °C 
 31.6 °C29.6 °C29.2 °C 
 29.8 °C26 °C22.8 °C 
Maksimum: 31.6 °C
Ortalama: 28.8 °C
27.4 °C39.4 °C38 °C
29.6 °C41.6 °C31.8 °C
22.6 °C25.4 °C29 °C
Maksimum: 41.6 °C
Ortalama: 31.6 °C
Güç kaynağı  42.2 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-0.8 °C / -1.4 F).
System idle (top)
System idle (top)
System idle (bottom)
System idle (bottom)
Maximum stress (top)
Maximum stress (top)
Maximum stress (bottom)
Maximum stress (bottom)

Stress Test

We stress the system with synthetic loads to identify for any potential throttling or stability issues. When running Prime95 to stress the CPU, clock rates would jump to the 2.1 to 2.2 GHz range and then maintain that speed indefinitely at a relatively cool core temperature of 59 C. The Core i7-8565U, however, is rated for a maximum multi-core Turbo Boost of 4.1 GHz meaning that the Pavilion system isn't exploiting the performance potential of the CPU. Results are somewhat similar to the older HP Spectre x360 15 with the Core i7-8550U as that would stabilize at 2.1 GHz and 64 C when under similar Prime95 stress conditions. Running both Prime95 and FurMark simultaneously will throttle the CPU to just 1.0 GHz while maintaining a core temperature of 59 C. There is definitely temperature overhead for faster Turbo Boost clock rates, but that is not exploited here at all.

Running on batteries will not limit performance. A 3DMark 11 run on battery power returns Physics and Graphics scores of 5511 and 1735 points, respectively, compared to 5740 and 1759 points when on mains.

System idle
System idle
Prime95 stress
Prime95 stress
Prime95+FurMark stress
Prime95+FurMark stress
CPU Clock (GHz) GPU Clock (MHz) Average CPU Temperature (°C)
System Idle -- -- 32
Prime95 Stress 2.1 - 2.2 -- 59
Prime95 + FurMark Stress 1.0 750 59

Speakers

Maximum volume is about the same as on the HP Spectre x360 15 (~80 dB). Pink noise measurements, however, reveal a narrower scope of frequencies and poorer bass reproduction on the Pavilion system. Maximum volume introduces no static or surface vibrations.

Speakers grilles are diamond-shaped for added visual flair
Speakers grilles are diamond-shaped for added visual flair
Pink noise at maximum volume
Pink noise at maximum volume
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204443.1442541.33841.33140.94040.94038.237.338.25037.934.937.96338.936.338.9803435.73410035.934.935.912540.533.240.516049.232.149.22005732.15725062.93162.931566.43166.440063.930.563.950061.93061.963062.929.562.980062.529.262.5100066.92966.912507228.572160072.428.272.4200068.428.368.4250066.42866.4315065.128.165.1400067.52867.5500068.12868.1630070.427.870.4800068.527.768.51000061.827.761.81250057.327.657.31600053.527.553.5SPL80.340.680.3N49.2449.2median 63.9median 28.5median 63.9Delta51.2535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065clApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Idling on desktop consumes about 3 W to 7 W depending on the power profile and brightness setting to be just slightly more power efficient than the Asus VivoBook Flip 15 or Lenovo Ideapad C340 each with higher resolution 1080p displays. Running 3DMark 06 will bump consumption to 26.7 W compared to 37 W and 38 W on the Asus VivoBook Flip 15 or Ryzen 3 2300U-powered Dell Inspiron 15 3585. The Pavilion is more efficient mostly because it doesn't benefit from any significant Turbo Boost upticks.

We're able to measure a maximum consumption of 28.8 W from the small (~9.4 x 3.9 x 2.7 cm) 45 W adapter. Attempting to recharge the system via USB Type-C will not work.

Constant consumption when running 3DMark 06
Constant consumption when running 3DMark 06
Prime95 initiated at 10s mark. Consumption remains steady at about 28 W with no initial temporary spike unlike on most other laptops
Prime95 initiated at 10s mark. Consumption remains steady at about 28 W with no initial temporary spike unlike on most other laptops
Prime95+FurMark initiated at 10s mark. Power consumption behavior backs up our clock rate Stress Test observations above
Prime95+FurMark initiated at 10s mark. Power consumption behavior backs up our clock rate Stress Test observations above
Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.17 / 0.8 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 3.6 / 5.4 / 6.5 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 26.7 / 28.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
i5-8265U, GeForce MX230, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
R3 2300U, Vega 6, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-28%
-48%
-43%
-59%
-96%
Idle Minimum *
3.6
3.9
-8%
3.23
10%
4.8
-33%
6.3
-75%
3.79
-5%
Idle Average *
5.4
7.2
-33%
6.3
-17%
7
-30%
9.2
-70%
6.9
-28%
Idle Maximum *
6.5
9.5
-46%
8
-23%
9.5
-46%
9.6
-48%
9.2
-42%
Load Average *
26.7
36.8
-38%
47
-76%
40.8
-53%
38
-42%
62
-132%
Load Maximum *
28.8
33.1
-15%
67.3
-134%
44.3
-54%
46
-60%
108
-275%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

Battery capacity is small at just 41 Wh compared to 56 Wh and 84 Wh on the pricier Envy x360 15 and Spectre x360 15, respectively. Runtimes are unsurprisingly short at just over 4 hours of real-world WLAN use. Recharging from empty to full capacity takes about 1.5 hours.

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
12h 17min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 17min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
1h 25min
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 41 Wh
Asus VivoBook Flip 15 TP510UA-E8073T
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad C340-15IWL-81N5004QGE
i5-8265U, GeForce MX230, 52.5 Wh
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
R5 2500U, Vega 8, 55.8 Wh
Dell Inspiron 15 3585 (2300U, Vega 6)
R3 2300U, Vega 6, 42 Wh
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, 97 Wh
Battery Runtime
39%
100%
66%
3%
123%
Reader / Idle
737
440
-40%
WiFi v1.3
257
358
39%
514
100%
426
66%
318
24%
844
228%
Load
85
105
24%
100
18%

Artılar

+ nispeten soğuk çalışma sıcaklıkları
+ genişletilebilir M.2 depolama ve RAM
+ dar çerçeveler, nispeten hafif
+ dönüştürülebilir 2'si 1 arada form faktörü
+ entegre NumPad
+ iyi liman seçenekleri
+ sessiz fan

Eksiler

- hemen hemen tüm parlaklık seviyelerinde darbe genişliği modülasyonu
- gizlilik deklanşörü, IR veya parmak izi okuyucu yok
- dar gam; zayıf renk üretimi
- Dar görüş açılarına sahip TN panel
- çok düşük kontrast oranı
- zor servis kolaylığı
- ortalama pil ömrü
- çok düşük çözünürlük
- loş arka ışık
- yüksek fiyatlı

Verdict

In review: HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
In review: HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl

The redeeming aspects of the 2019 Pavilion x360 15 are its narrow bezels, light weight, and small dimensions relative to other budget convertibles of this size category. Port options are respectable and fan noise is relatively quiet due to the limited Turbo Boost and good core temperatures.

Unfortunately, almost everything else falls apart. For a $1000, the Pavilion x360 15 offers short battery life, a weak chassis design and one of the worst displays you can get on any laptop with a Whiskey Lake-U CPU. The display is dim, contrast is low, colors are poor, and viewing angles are narrow because of the TN panel which almost completely negates the benefits of a 2-in-1 form factor. A configuration like this should not even exist at this price range.

Now, the actual Pavilion x360 15 model isn't bad for a budget laptop. Lower-end configurations retail for about $500 to be an easier pill to swallow. Nonetheless, we highly recommend configuring any SKU with the 1080p panel instead. If the convertible form factor is not a must-have, then the Walmart Motile could be a worthwhile alternative.

Not worth the exorbitant four-digit market price. If you're willing to spend $1000 on a new laptop, then consider the HP Envy or Spectre instead.

HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl - 02/09/2020 v7
Allen Ngo

İşcilik
66 / 98 → 68%
Klavye
68%
Mouse
78%
Bağlanılabilirlik
43 / 80 → 53%
Ağırlık
64 / 20-72 → 84%
Batarya
59 / 95 → 62%
Görüntü
62%
Oyun performansı
50 / 90 → 56%
Uygulama performansı
83 / 90 → 92%
Isınma
94%
Ses
97 / 95 → 100%
Audio
80%
Camera
30 / 85 → 35%
Ortalama
67%
72%
Multimedia - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > HP Pavilion x360 15 2019 Dönüştürülebilir İnceleme: Bu Yapılandırmayı Satın Alma
Allen Ngo, 2020-02-24 (Update: 2020-02-24)