Notebookcheck

Huawei P Smart 2020 incelemesi - Rahat ve eski

Old fare in new clothes? Huawei P Smart 2020, Google Hizmetleri ile birlikte gelir ve selefine çok benziyor. Bazı yeni renkler ve biraz daha fazla depolama alanı alırken, birkaç küçük değişiklik uygun fiyatlı akıllı telefonu güncel tutacak kadar yeterli mi?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt,
Huawei P Smart 2020

Huawei'yi gerçekten anlayabilirsiniz ve Çinli üreticinin umutsuzluğa girmeye başladığı: Amerikan teknolojisi yasağı nedeniyle, üreticinin artık Google Hizmetlerine erişimi yok. Bu aynı zamanda yeni modeller için sertifikasyonu zor hatta imkansız hale getirir. Bir yıl öncesine kadar akıllıca kaplanabilecek şey artık Huawei P Smart 2020'de oldukça açık hale geliyor: Huawei eski modelleri basitçe yeniden yayınlamaya başladı ve sadece yeni bir sertifikanın hala gerekli olmayacağı kadar değişti. Huawei P Smart 2019 popüler bir akıllı telefondu, bu yüzden Huawei, halefte çok fazla değişmezse o kadar da kötü değil, değil mi? Bunu testimizde tam olarak öğrenmek istiyoruz. Not: Bazı ölçütleri yükleme sorunları nedeniyle Huawei'den ek bir test birimi istedik. Huawei P Smart 2020'de ek test sonuçları alır almaz bu testi güncelleyeceğiz.

Huawei P Smart 2020 (P Seri)
İşlemci
HiSilicon Kirin 710 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Grafik kartı
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Bellek
4096 MB 
Görüntü
6.21 inç 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 415 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, parlak: evet, 60 Hz
Harddisk
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 116 GB Boş
Bağlantılar
1 USB 2.0, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm audio port, Kart okuyucular: microSD up to 512 GB, 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Alıcılar: acceleration sensor, proximity sensor, compass
Network
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B7/​B8/​B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 8.2 x 155.3 x 73.5
Batarya
3400 mAh Lithium-Polymer
İşletim sistemi
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps (camera 1); 2.0MP, depth sharpness (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: mono speaker at the bottom edge, Klavye: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, headset, SIM tool, 24 Ay Garanti, LTE Cat 6 (300Mbps/​50Mbps); FM radio; notification LED (multi-colored), fanless
Ağırlık
163 g, Güç kaynağı: 62 g
Fiyat
199 Euro
Bağlantılar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
77 %
06/2020
Huawei P Smart 2020
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
163 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.21"2340x1080
76 %
06/2020
Nokia 5.3
SD 665, Adreno 610
185 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.55"1600x720
81 %
06/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
77 %
06/2020
Motorola Moto G8
SD 665, Adreno 610
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.4"1560x720
85 %
01/2019
Huawei P Smart 2019
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
160 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.2"2340x1080

Zümrüt Yeşili ile P Smart 2020 için selefinin sahip olmadığı yeni bir renk var, aksi takdirde Aurora Blue ve Midnight Black bilinen varyasyonlar. Her iki model için de mevcut olan bu renklerde P Smart 2020'nin dışı, 2019'dan itibaren P Smart'a çok benziyor. Sadece kamera modülü Huawei'nin mevcut tasarımına güncellendi ve gerçekten de daha yüksek bir kaliteye sahip görünüyor. selefi. P Smart 2020, elbette öncelikle küçük pilinden dolayı oldukça ince ve hafif bir akıllı telefon. Ancak, bu yön mevcut akıllı telefonları çok büyük ve ağır bulanlar için hala ilginç olabilir. Akıllı telefon ele rahatça oturur, oldukça sağlam bir yapıya sahiptir ve bükmeye çalışırken sadece sessizce kırışır. Akıllı telefon, öndeki veya arkadaki basınca neredeyse hiç tepki vermiyor. Bununla birlikte, kullanmaya başladıktan kısa bir süre sonra, ışık sağa çarptığında ve parmak izleri de hızlı bir şekilde görünür hale geldiğinde kasa üzerinde bazı minimum çizikler görebilirsiniz. Ancak en azından ekran koruyucusu öncekinden daha iyi yerleştirildi ve günlük kullanımda zorlukla görüyor veya hissedebiliyorsunuz.

Huawei P Smart 2020
Huawei P Smart 2020
Huawei P Smart 2020
Huawei P Smart 2020
Huawei P Smart 2020

Boyut Karşılaştırma

165.8 mm 76.7 mm 8.8 mm 209 g164.3 mm 76.6 mm 8.5 mm 185 g161.3 mm 75.8 mm 9 mm 188 g155.3 mm 73.5 mm 8.2 mm 163 g155.2 mm 73.4 mm 7.95 mm 160 g

Ekipman - Huawei'nin daha fazla depolama alanı var

128 GB depolama alanı ile Huawei P Smart 2020, öncekinden daha iyi bir donanıma sahip ve buradaki fiyat sınıfındaki diğer cihazlara bir avantaj sağlıyor. Ayrıca şu anda 4 GB çalışma belleği var ve depolama alanını genişletmek için bir microSD kart kullanabilirsiniz, ancak daha sonra iki SIM yuvasından biri dolu olacaktır.NFC, temassız ödemeler için Google Pay'ı kullanmanızı sağlar. misal. USB-C artık uygun fiyatlı cihazlarda bile daha sık kullanılabilir olmasına ve kesinlikle standart haline gelmesine rağmen, hala sadece bir mikro USB bağlantısı olması çok kötü.

Top: microphone, SIM slot
Top: microphone, SIM slot
Bottom: 3.5-mm audio port, microphone, micro USB, speaker
Bottom: 3.5-mm audio port, microphone, micro USB, speaker
Right: standby button, volume rocker
Right: standby button, volume rocker
Left: No connections
Left: No connections

Yazılım - Android 9? Doğru okudunuz!

Huawei P Smart 2020'nin hala selefi gibi Android 9 ile birlikte geldiği doğrudur, bu nedenle Google'ın işletim sisteminin eski bir sürümünü ve Huawei'nin şirket içi kullanıcı arabirimi olan ilgili EMUI 9'u kullanır. Güvenlik yamaları Şubat 2020'den beri, bu yüzden testlerimizde zaten yaşlanmışlar. Can sıkıcı: Huawei'nin EMUI 9'u Android 9'a dayandığından, tüm arka planları karanlık gösteren sistem için Karanlık Mod yoktur. Ayrıca, birkaç uygulama yüklerken bazı sorunlar yaşadık, ancak nedenlerini doğrulayamadık. Tüm izinleri ayarlamış olsak da uygulamalar APK'lardan yüklenemedi ve Google Play Store'daki bazı uygulamaların da yüklemeyle ilgili bazı sorunları vardı. Muhtemelen bunun nedeni test birimimizdi, bu yüzden Huawei'den başka bir cihaz istedi. Gerekirse bu testi güncelleyeceğiz. En azından Huawei herhangi bir üçüncü taraf uygulaması yüklemez, ancak yalnızca bazıları da kaldırılabilen ücretsiz araçlarla kapsamlı bir şirket içi uygulama paketi yükler. Arkadaş gruplarında birkaç Huawei ve / veya Honor akıllı telefonu olanlar, bunları bir Parti modu ile bağlayabilir ve birkaç hoparlöre sahip bir ses sistemine sahip olmak gibi tüm cihazlarda aynı müziği çalabilir.

Software Huawei P Smart 2020
Software Huawei P Smart 2020
Software Huawei P Smart 2020

İletişim ve GPS - Birkaç LTE bandı

LTE Cat.6 ile maksimum LTE hızı fiyat sınıfı için uygundur, ancak sadece gerekli minimum LTE frekans bantları desteklenir, böylece yurtdışına seyahat ederken mobil İnternet kullanmak zorlaşabilir. Huawei P Smart 2020'nin alımı iç mekanlarda oldukça iyi ve çoğu zaman şehir çevresinde tam olarak resepsiyon aldık. WLAN açısından Wi-Fi 5 desteklenmektedir. Bu gerçekten bu fiyat sınıfı için alışılmış, ancak yine de benzer miktarda para için bazı daha yavaş modeller var. P Smart 2020, hızlarına kadar selefinin seviyesindedir ve Netgear Nighthawk AX12 referans yönlendiricimizle iletişimde biraz tutarsız veri hızları gösterir.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
286 (min: 225, max: 321) MBit/s ∼100% +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=553)
264 MBit/s ∼92% +32%
Huawei P Smart 2020
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
200 (min: 126, max: 252) MBit/s ∼70%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
164 (min: 28, max: 206) MBit/s ∼57% -18%
Nokia 5.3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
145 (min: 20, max: 215) MBit/s ∼51% -27%
Motorola Moto G8
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54.4 (min: 38, max: 57) MBit/s ∼19% -73%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
256 (min: 247, max: 263) MBit/s ∼100% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=553)
250 MBit/s ∼98% +18%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
226 (min: 197, max: 262) MBit/s ∼88% +7%
Huawei P Smart 2020
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
211 (min: 175, max: 242) MBit/s ∼82%
Nokia 5.3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
163 (min: 25, max: 258) MBit/s ∼64% -23%
Motorola Moto G8
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.8 (min: 40, max: 67) MBit/s ∼22% -74%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø200 (126-252)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø211 (175-242)
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test indoors
GPS Test outdoors
GPS Test outdoors

Beidou, GLONASS ve GPS konum belirleme için desteklenen uydu şebekeleridir. İçeride, eğer varsa, yerleştirme sadece pencerelerin yakınında ve hatta yaklaşık olarak mümkündür. Bununla birlikte, dış mekanda konum doğruluğu hızlı bir şekilde dört metreye kadar çıkar. Pratik testimiz bize Huawei akıllı telefonun konum doğruluğu hakkında daha fazla bilgi verir. Bunun için bisikletimize atlıyoruz ve ayrıca karşılaştırma için Garmin Edge 520 profesyonel navigasyon cihazını alıyoruz. İlk bakışta, Huawei akıllı telefon şikayet için fazla bir neden vermiyor. Yer belirleme oldukça doğrudur ve bazı küçük turları göz ardı ederseniz rotaya sadık kalırsınız. Ancak, kavşak görüntüsünün üstünde görebileceğiniz gibi, rotayı kaydederken ortada bir düşüş var. Genel olarak, mutlak doğruluk çok önemli değilse ve bazı nadir bırakmalarla da yaşayabiliyorsanız akıllı telefonu navigasyon için kullanabilirsiniz.

Garmin Edge 520 locating – overview
Garmin Edge 520 locating – overview
Garmin Edge 520 locating – junction
Garmin Edge 520 locating – junction
Garmin Edge 520 locating – bridge
Garmin Edge 520 locating – bridge
Huawei P Smart 2020 locating – overview
Huawei P Smart 2020 locating – overview
Huawei P Smart 2020 locating – junction
Huawei P Smart 2020 locating – junction
Huawei P Smart 2020 locating – bridge
Huawei P Smart 2020 locating – bridge

Telefon İşlevleri ve Ses Kalitesi - İyi ses üretimi ile P Smart

Huawei'nin kendi Telefon uygulaması Google'ın standart uygulamasından biraz farklıdır, ancak kullanımı da kolaydır ve hızlı bir şekilde öğrenilebilir. Menüde Wi-Fi ile Arama veya VoLTE için bir seçenek görmedik.Dahili kulaklığı kullanan ses kalitesi oldukça iyi. Maksimum ses seviyesinde, konuşma ortağımızın sesi hafifçe patlar, ancak aksi takdirde ses çıkar ve oldukça sıcaktır. Ne kadar sessiz veya yüksek sesle konuşsak konuşalım, kendi sesimiz de iyi aktarılıyor. Ses kalitesi de hoparlör kullanılarak oldukça iyidir ve kendi sesimiz mikrofon tarafından net bir şekilde kaydedilir.

Kameralar - Yalnızca tek bir fotoğraf lensi

Picture taken with front camera
Picture taken with front camera

Evet, Huawei P Smart 2020'de çift kamera var, ancak hayır, birkaç odak mesafesine sahip bir zoom kamera değil. İkinci mercek sadece derinlik keskinliğini belirlemek için iyidir, bu nedenle fotoğraf çekmek için kullanılmaz. 13 megapiksel çözünürlükte, ana kamera öncekiyle aynı özellikleri sunuyor. İyi fotoğraflar çeker, ancak ayrıntılar hızla soluk görünür ve diğer akıllı telefon kameralarında kontrast da daha yüksektir. Düşük ışıkta çekilen görüntüler netliği hızla kaybederken, parlaklık oldukça iyidir.Genel olarak, ana kamera ile makul resimler çekebilirsiniz. Bununla birlikte, P Smart 2020, bu fiyat aralığındaki diğer akıllı telefonlar tarafından sunulan bir zoom kameranın esnekliğine sahip değildir. Bir yandan, kamera uygulaması çok geniştir ve birçok işlev sunar. Öte yandan, örneğin yalnızca otomatik olarak en iyi ayarlara ayarlanan AI kamerayı 8 megapiksel görüntü boyutunda kullanabilirsiniz. Videolar maksimum 1080p ve 30 fps'de kaydedilebilir. Görüntü kalitesi iyi ve zayıf ışık koşullarında parlaklık hala iyi. Önde bir su damlası çentiği içinde, öncekinden zaten bilinen 8 megapiksel bir ön kamera var. Bununla birlikte servis yapılabilir selfie'ler de alabilirsiniz. Kamera, görüntüdeki parlaklık farklarıyla oldukça iyi sonuç verir ve en azından küçük büyütme boyutlarında iyi bir keskinlik sunar.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3

Test laboratuvarımızdaki kontrollü ışık koşullarında, ana kamera iyi renk üretimi ve kontrastı gösterir. Ancak, neredeyse hiç ışık yoksa, lens artık hiçbir şeyi tanıyamaz.

ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
63.5 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
75.4 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
42 ∆E
89.8 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P Smart 2020: 46.61 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 89.79 ∆E
ColorChecker
6.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P Smart 2020: 5.59 ∆E min: 1.33 - max: 10.35 ∆E

Aksesuarlar ve Garanti - İki yıl boyunca güvenlik

Akıllı telefonun yanı sıra kutuda şarj cihazı, USB kablosu ve SIM aracı da bulunuyor. Huawei, oldukça kabul edilebilir bir ses sunan kablolu bir kulaklık da içeriyor.Üretici, akıllı telefonda 24 ay garanti sunuyor.

Giriş Aygıtları ve Çalışması - Arkada bir parmak izi sensörü

Dokunmatik ekran her yerde kolayca çalıştırılabilir ve köşelerde de hassastır. Sistem birçok durumda sorunsuz çalışma için yeterince hızlıdır ve sadece küçük zamanlar veya bekleme süreleri yalnızca zaman zaman oluşur.WiftKey klavye uygulaması olarak kullanılır ve hoşlanmayanlar da başka bir uygulama yükleyebilir. Bununla birlikte, bunu yaparken, kime güvendiğinize dikkat etmelisiniz, çünkü bir klavye uygulaması üreticisi tüm girişlerinizi potansiyel olarak okuyabilir. Bu, örneğin yazım denetimi için sunucuya aktarıldıklarında parolaları içerir. Arkadaki parmak izi sensörü, cihazın kilidini hafif bir gecikmeyle açar, ancak çok güvenilirdir.

Keyboard - portrait
Keyboard - portrait
Keyboard - landscape
Keyboard - landscape

Display - Huawei with mediocre brightness

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The display offers an expanded Full HD resolution, which is a good thing for this price range but not completely unusual. The display is based on IPS technology. The measurements for the brightness remind us of the predecessor, and at 448 cd/m² on average, they are at a rather low level. The brightness distribution is fairly even.

423
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 484 cd/m² Ortalama: 448.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.166 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 87 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 446 cd/m²
Kontrast: 875:1 (Siyah: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.22 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.43
Huawei P Smart 2020
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21
Nokia 5.3
IPS, 1600x720, 6.55
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Motorola Moto G8
IPS, 1560x720, 6.4
Huawei P Smart 2019
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2
Screen
1%
22%
35%
34%
Brightness middle
446
523
17%
622
39%
504
13%
458
3%
Brightness
448
482
8%
612
37%
452
1%
440
-2%
Brightness Distribution
87
86
-1%
94
8%
83
-5%
85
-2%
Black Level *
0.51
0.46
10%
0.56
-10%
0.28
45%
0.35
31%
Contrast
875
1137
30%
1111
27%
1800
106%
1309
50%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.22
6.22
-19%
3.98
24%
3.84
26%
1.4
73%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.66
10.56
-22%
7.33
15%
6.1
30%
3.8
56%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.8
8
-18%
4.5
34%
2.7
60%
2.4
65%
Gamma
2.43 91%
2.226 99%
2.206 100%
2.235 98%
2.22 99%
CCT
7956 82%
8856 73%
7361 88%
7125 91%
6235 104%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
114.9

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 344 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 344 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 344 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18084 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

At 0.51 cd/m², the black value is only average, and at high brightness dark areas appear more dark gray than black. Colors are also not that vibrant, which you can see in the low contrast value.

The measurements with the CalMAN software and the spectral photometer show that the display has a strong blue tint. However, you can adjust the white balance fairly extensively in the settings, allowing you to bring the display closer to your personal needs and tastes.

CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Color Accuracy
CalMAN Color Accuracy
CalMAN Color Space
CalMAN Color Space
CalMAN Saturation
CalMAN Saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.2 ms).

Outdoors, the display has some visible difficulties. While on cloudy days, its brightness is sufficient, you should look for a shady place on sunny days. The viewing angles are fairly decent, and there are only slight brightness differences when you look at the display from the side. The display contents always remain easily recognizable.

Viewing angles
Viewing angles
Outdoor use
Outdoor use

Performance - We already know the SoC from before

The HiSilicon Kirin 710 is the SoC that is currently used in probably most of the smartphones from Huawei and Honor. While the processor is still fairly fast even in 2020, you do notice that technology has advanced at this point. Huawei will have to think about something new next year for sure, in order to be able to keep up. However, currently it is still sufficient for fairly smooth operation with some smaller stutters under high loads.

In terms of the graphics, the smartphone is currently also able to still keep up, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S already offers more power.

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2329 Points ∼84%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2321 Points ∼84% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2765 Points ∼100% +19%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2240 Points ∼81% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2196 - 2345, n=5)
2296 Points ∼83% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=141)
2641 Points ∼96% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
803 Points ∼28%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
995 Points ∼34% +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2257 Points ∼77% +181%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
914 Points ∼31% +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (796 - 1220, n=5)
948 Points ∼32% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=141)
2919 Points ∼100% +264%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
940 Points ∼36%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1140 Points ∼43% +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2353 Points ∼90% +150%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1052 Points ∼40% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (927 - 1365, n=5)
1087 Points ∼41% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=141)
2627 Points ∼100% +179%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2257 Points ∼69%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2409 Points ∼74% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3256 Points ∼100% +44%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2379 Points ∼73% +5%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2085 Points ∼64% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1851 - 2789, n=14)
2341 Points ∼72% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5766, n=487)
2155 Points ∼66% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
831 Points ∼33%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
999 Points ∼39% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2551 Points ∼100% +207%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
990 Points ∼39% +19%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
838 Points ∼33% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (470 - 1194, n=14)
830 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=487)
2041 Points ∼80% +146%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
967 Points ∼36%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1148 Points ∼43% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2680 Points ∼100% +177%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1138 Points ∼42% +18%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
966 Points ∼36% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (563 - 1351, n=14)
964 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=488)
1895 Points ∼71% +96%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2221 Points ∼68%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2396 Points ∼73% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3267 Points ∼100% +47%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2347 Points ∼72% +6%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2459 Points ∼75% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1656 - 2723, n=14)
2351 Points ∼72% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5721, n=517)
2065 Points ∼63% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1251 Points ∼33%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1692 Points ∼44% +35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3803 Points ∼100% +204%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1669 Points ∼44% +33%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1225 Points ∼32% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (740 - 1378, n=14)
1241 Points ∼33% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=517)
2713 Points ∼71% +117%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1385 Points ∼38%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1810 Points ∼49% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3669 Points ∼100% +165%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1783 Points ∼49% +29%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1379 Points ∼38% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (844 - 1534, n=14)
1386 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=517)
2282 Points ∼62% +65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2325 Points ∼74%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2476 Points ∼79% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3152 Points ∼100% +36%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2409 Points ∼76% +4%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2392 Points ∼76% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1924 - 2716, n=14)
2427 Points ∼77% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=567)
2040 Points ∼65% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
728 Points ∼31%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
999 Points ∼42% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2369 Points ∼100% +225%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
945 Points ∼40% +30%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
703 Points ∼30% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (457 - 856, n=14)
748 Points ∼32% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=567)
1706 Points ∼72% +134%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
859 Points ∼34%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1152 Points ∼46% +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2507 Points ∼100% +192%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1093 Points ∼44% +27%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
834 Points ∼33% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (550 - 999, n=14)
883 Points ∼35% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7305, n=568)
1630 Points ∼65% +90%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2328 Points ∼76%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2482 Points ∼81% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3070 Points ∼100% +32%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2405 Points ∼78% +3%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2381 Points ∼78% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1907 - 2654, n=14)
2421 Points ∼79% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=609)
1906 Points ∼62% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
979 Points ∼27%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1663 Points ∼46% +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points ∼100% +273%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1632 Points ∼45% +67%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
683 Points ∼19% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (568 - 1335, n=14)
1052 Points ∼29% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=608)
2232 Points ∼61% +128%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1124 Points ∼32%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1795 Points ∼51% +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3501 Points ∼100% +211%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1758 Points ∼50% +56%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
812 Points ∼23% -28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (673 - 1490, n=14)
1198 Points ∼34% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=611)
1926 Points ∼55% +71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12009 Points ∼49%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20320 Points ∼83% +69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20019 Points ∼82% +67%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24457 Points ∼100% +104%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
11212 Points ∼46% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11158 - 22668, n=11)
16112 Points ∼66% +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 57583, n=757)
15142 Points ∼62% +26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19251 Points ∼37%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15403 Points ∼29% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
52700 Points ∼100% +174%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24828 Points ∼47% +29%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19510 Points ∼37% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2177 - 22605, n=11)
18499 Points ∼35% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=755)
25366 Points ∼48% +32%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16976 Points ∼44%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24065 Points ∼62% +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38671 Points ∼100% +128%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24745 Points ∼64% +46%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
16754 Points ∼43% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12120 - 22168, n=11)
18933 Points ∼49% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 110468, n=755)
20037 Points ∼52% +18%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1146 Score ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2416 Score ∼93% +111%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (961 - 1146, n=3)
1047 Score ∼40% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=82)
2609 Score ∼100% +128%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3256 Points ∼67%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
3157 Points ∼65% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2631 - 4083, n=11)
3514 Points ∼73% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=349)
4826 Points ∼100% +48%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5430 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6263 Points ∼100% +15%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5134 Points ∼82% -5%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5407 Points ∼86% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5266 - 5615, n=11)
5454 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=411)
4928 Points ∼79% -9%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1550 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2620 Points ∼100% +69%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1495 Points ∼57% -4%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1527 Points ∼58% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1523 - 1614, n=11)
1560 Points ∼60% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=411)
1500 Points ∼57% -3%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1021 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1410 Points ∼100% +38%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1224 Points ∼87% +20%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
982 Points ∼70% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (982 - 1212, n=13)
1092 Points ∼77% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=700)
801 Points ∼57% -22%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1488 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3807 Points ∼100% +156%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1932 Points ∼51% +30%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1469 Points ∼39% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1450 - 1489, n=13)
1470 Points ∼39% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=700)
2390 Points ∼63% +61%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3098 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4295 Points ∼100% +39%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2780 Points ∼65% -10%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2972 Points ∼69% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2823 - 4360, n=13)
3181 Points ∼74% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8398, n=700)
1769 Points ∼41% -43%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5132 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6828 Points ∼100% +33%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4391 Points ∼64% -14%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5074 Points ∼74% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4826 - 5568, n=13)
5208 Points ∼76% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=700)
3334 Points ∼49% -35%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2208 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3542 Points ∼100% +60%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2318 Points ∼65% +5%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2159 Points ∼61% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2140 - 2445, n=13)
2255 Points ∼64% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6205, n=700)
1690 Points ∼48% -23%

In terms of its surf speeds, the Huawei P Smart 2020 places in the middle of the field of test devices. In practice, this means that you have to live with some load times for websites, particularly with images. However, the Huawei smartphone is well-suited overall for surfing.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
48.527 Points ∼100% +58%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=163)
39.7 Points ∼82% +29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30 - 33, n=8)
31.5 Points ∼65% +2%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)
30.776 Points ∼63%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
29.117 Points ∼60% -5%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
89.457 Points ∼100% +78%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)
50.323 Points ∼56%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (47 - 55.1, n=10)
50.2 Points ∼56% 0%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
49.673 Points ∼56% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=593)
45.9 Points ∼51% -9%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
33.377 Points ∼37% -34%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chome 81)
44.1 runs/min ∼100% +45%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=147)
42.7 runs/min ∼97% +40%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30.4 - 33.9, n=6)
31.9 runs/min ∼72% +5%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chome 81)
30.4 runs/min ∼69%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chome 81)
25.4 runs/min ∼58% -16%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=227)
69.6 Points ∼100% +12%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
69 Points ∼99% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
69 Points ∼99% +11%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)
62.1 Points ∼89%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (52 - 69, n=11)
61.7 Points ∼89% -1%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
38 Points ∼55% -39%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
17303 Points ∼100% +78%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
9708 Points ∼56% 0%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)
9699 Points ∼56%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 10544, n=13)
9659 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=758)
7596 Points ∼44% -22%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
6133 Points ∼35% -37%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=784)
9968 ms * ∼100% -149%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
6719 ms * ∼67% -68%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4853, n=13)
4223 ms * ∼42% -6%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)
4000.3 ms * ∼40%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
3998.8 ms * ∼40% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
2794.2 ms * ∼28% +30%

* ... smaller is better

The storage has only increased and has not become any faster. It is still the slow eMMC flash type, which is still fairly widespread in this price range. While you have to live with some longer wait times when starting apps, overall the data is mostly made available smoothly.

The microSD card reader can handle our Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 quite well and offers good data rates.

Huawei P Smart 2020Nokia 5.3Xiaomi Redmi Note 9SMotorola Moto G8Huawei P Smart 2019Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
31%
70%
27%
7%
8%
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
54.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-18%
48.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-27%
66.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
64.8 (52.8 - 73.5, n=17)
-3%
50.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=504)
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
74.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
68.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
76.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
77.5 (71.6 - 85.9, n=17)
2%
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=504)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
61.1
45.2
-26%
123.6
102%
128.1
110%
70.7
16%
45 (8.48 - 151, n=19)
-26%
32 (0.14 - 319, n=846)
-48%
Random Read 4KB
41.2
109.1
165%
137
233%
57.3
39%
45.66
11%
69.1 (20.7 - 108, n=19)
68%
56.1 (1.59 - 324, n=846)
36%
Sequential Write 256KB
168.3
243.2
45%
214.8
28%
239
42%
191.4
14%
176 (90 - 256, n=19)
5%
119 (2.99 - 911, n=846)
-29%
Sequential Read 256KB
282.1
299.5
6%
496.6
76%
301
7%
288.27
2%
287 (144 - 499, n=19)
2%
323 (12.1 - 1802, n=846)
14%

Games - Not always 30 fps

Gaming is possible on the Huawei P Smart 2020 but not always in smooth 30 fps. From time to time, the frame rate drops down to 20 fps, which can become noticeable as a slight stutter. But this goes for the more demanding games that we test, and simple games such as Angry Birds run smoothly. We determine the frame rates with the tools from GameBench.

The control via position sensor and touchscreen also works without any problems.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Asphalt 9
Asphalt 9
010203040Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.18.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.18.0: Ø29.7 (24-32)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.2.2a: Ø29.2 (19-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.2.2a: Ø29 (19-31)

Emissions - A hot Huawei smartphone

Temperature

While under longer lasting, higher load, the Huawei P Smart 2020 becomes noticeably warm, but it does not reach any critical or uncomfortable temperatures. Unfortunately, GFXBench refuses to run on the smartphone, so that we are unable to test the performance stability under longer load and also cannot make any determination on throttling of the performance.

Because of the differences in heat development between the P Smart 2019 and P Smart 2020, we could think of several scenarios: Either Huawei raised the thermal limit for throttling on purpose, making more power available but also causing more heat to develop or Huawei has simply changed the internal design slightly, causing heat to become more trapped. 

However, during our benchmarks, we do not see any significant performance differences between the two smartphones, so that we can come to the conclusion that the Huawei P Smart 2020 heats up more than its predecessor while offering the same performance.

Maksimum yük
 43.8 °C40.2 °C38.4 °C 
 44.3 °C40 °C39.3 °C 
 43.4 °C40.3 °C38.7 °C 
Maksimum: 44.3 °C
Ortalama: 40.9 °C
38.8 °C40.3 °C43.5 °C
38.7 °C40.6 °C45.3 °C
38.5 °C40.6 °C44.7 °C
Maksimum: 45.3 °C
Ortalama: 41.2 °C
Güç kaynağı  41 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
Heat map - back
Heat map - back
Heat map - front
Heat map - front

Speaker

Pink Noise speaker test
Pink Noise speaker test

The speaker on the bottom edge does not become extremely loud, but it offers a fairly balanced sound, particularly for such an affordable device. Songs or voices can be heard and understood easily. Of course, the speaker will only remain an emergency solution for those who like to listen to music, but at least the Huawei P Smart 2020 sounds better than some other smartphones.

Audio devices can be connected via Bluetooth and 3.5-mm audio port, which works without any problems, and the transferred sound is also clean.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.433.42539.733.6312829.94027.430.75029.830.76325.828.68022.223.610023.424.212521.221.316019.224.220018.9362501938.431517.246.24001649.850016.755.763018.86080014.765.6100015.666.812501463.8160013.962.5200014.460.4250014.756.6315014.355.840001564500015.765.6630015.862.8800015.763.41000016.264.91250015.749.91600015.951SPL67.471.86327.674.8N21.626.315133.9median 15.8median 56.6Delta1.910.432.430.53531.927.126.4262730.431.225.228.822.722.525.522.120.124.719.235.417.839.417.845.916.149.916.655.715.962.514.365.514.770.414.873.614.37114.165.116.369.114.472.313.868.713.970.414.264.414.559.114.666.41568.115.359.115.751.660.964.571.226.98113.817.725.60.948.4median 15median 64.41.610.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P Smart 2020Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P Smart 2020 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Battery Life - Short days with the Huawei smartphone

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Huawei P Smart 2020 is minimally higher than that of the predecessor. However, the smartphone doesn't fare badly overall if you compare it with other smartphones of this price range. So the efficiency is at an acceptable level.

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 1 / 2.1 / 2.5 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 4.3 / 7.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P Smart 2020
3400 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Motorola Moto G8
4000 mAh
Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-14%
-5%
4%
-4%
15%
Idle Minimum *
1
1.5
-50%
1.3
-30%
0.84
16%
1.058 (0.8 - 2.3, n=13)
-6%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=859)
12%
Idle Average *
2.1
2.1
-0%
2
5%
2.21
-5%
2.2 (1.2 - 3, n=13)
-5%
1.751 (0.6 - 6.2, n=858)
17%
Idle Maximum *
2.5
2.5
-0%
2.8
-12%
2.23
11%
2.57 (2.2 - 4.2, n=13)
-3%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=859)
19%
Load Average *
4.3
5.2
-21%
3.9
9%
4.2
2%
4.61 (4.06 - 6, n=13)
-7%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=853)
5%
Load Maximum *
7.5
7.5
-0%
7.2
4%
7.86
-5%
7.6 (6.13 - 9.4, n=13)
-1%
6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=853)
20%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

The 3400-mAh battery is relatively small for 2020, and the predecessor has already been unable to get much out of the same-size battery. The Huawei P Smart 2020 only does a minimally better job, but with 8:43 hours in our WLAN test, it only lasts half as long as a Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. The Motorola Moto G8 also offers a significantly longer battery life. 

There is also no quick-charge feature, but since the battery is fairly small, you can still expect a full battery after less than two hours of recharging.

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
22h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 9min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
4h 24min
Huawei P Smart 2020
3400 mAh
Nokia 5.3
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Motorola Moto G8
4000 mAh
Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh
Battery Runtime
67%
91%
64%
-3%
Reader / Idle
1325
2263
71%
1953
47%
1293
-2%
H.264
489
1269
160%
1048
114%
464
-5%
WiFi v1.3
523
876
67%
1187
127%
988
89%
506
-3%
Load
264
279
6%
276
5%
257
-3%

Artılar

+ rahat ve hafif
+ iyi ses kalitesi
+ servis edilebilir hoparlör
+ hızlı WLAN
+ çok fazla depolama alanı

Eksiler

- Android 9 ve tarihli güvenlik yamaları
- az LTE frekansı
- fotoğraflar için sadece tek bir lens
- ekran daha parlak olabilirdi
- yüksek ısı gelişimi
- bazı uygulamalarla ilgili sorunlar
- nispeten kısa pil ömrü
- PWM düşük parlaklıkta titriyor

Verdict - A small update for a large price difference

In review: Huawei P Smart 2020. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei P Smart 2020. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany.

Huawei's P Smart series is popular. This is understandable, because until now the series offered a lot for the money. This also makes it possible that the P Smart 2020 still feels fairly current, even though there are only few changes compared to the predecessor.

But the first signs of wear have become visible: While the camera still takes solid pictures, it lacks the capability of zooming, which is offered by many devices of this price range at this point. You will also look in vain for modern features such as a USB-C port, VoLTE, or faster LTE with more frequency bands. To introduce a smartphone with Android 9 in 2020 without it being clear that it will ever get Android 10 is also questionable. 

The small battery turns out to be either a blessing or a curse, depending on the user. Those who want to get away from the daily charging of their smartphones won't get much of a chance, unless they use it very sparingly. On the other hand, the small battery allows for faster recharging and a fairly low weight.

For those who like it slim and light, the Huawei P Smart 2020 can still be recommended. But those who value a long battery life and modern software should look elsewhere.

The locating is fairly accurate, the WLAN is fairly fast, the performance is right, and the 128 GB of storage is also a positive point for the smartphone.

However, the Huawei P Smart 2020 also has an additional problem: This is called the P Smart 2019 and is basically the same smartphone with slightly less storage for much less money. So if you want to save, you might want to purchase the predecessor. While the successor is still a solid smartphone from the affordable mid-range, it does not feel as current anymore as other models in this price range.

Huawei P Smart 2020 - 05/30/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

İşcilik
77%
Klavye
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
94%
Bağlanılabilirlik
42 / 70 → 60%
Ağırlık
91%
Batarya
79%
Görüntü
83%
Oyun performansı
30 / 64 → 47%
Uygulama performansı
56 / 86 → 65%
Isınma
86%
Ses
100%
Audio
60 / 90 → 67%
Camera
55%
Ortalama
71%
77%
Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Huawei P Smart 2020 incelemesi - Rahat ve eski
Florian Schmitt, 2020-06-18 (Update: 2020-06-18)
Aslinur Sarica
Translator: Aslinur Sarica - Translator