Notebookcheck

Huawei P Smart 2021 Akıllı Telefon İncelemesi - Huawei'nin ilk "ev yapımı" SoC'si işe yarıyor mu?

A long way ahead... Kirin 710A ile Huawei, kendisini ABD'ye bağımlılıktan kurtarmak için akıllı telefonlarının yonga üretimini anavatanı Çin'e taşıdı. Ancak, sadece bu "kilometre taşı" da Huawei'nin ikilemini ortaya çıkarıyor.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (Çeviren Aslinur Sarica), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Huawei P Smart 2021 Smartphone

Orta seviye P Smart 2021 akıllı telefonunda Huawei, ilk kez Çinli bir ortağın imalatından gelen bir işlemci kullanıyor. Kirin 710A, Huawei'nin kendi geliştirdiği ilk SoC olarak kabul ediliyor. Uzun bir süredir Çinli üretici SMIC ve HiSilicon bölümü, Çin'de 14 nm işleminin ticarileştirilmesi için birlikte çalışıyor. "Orijinal" Kirin-710 SoC, modern 12 nm üretim sürecinde halihazırda üretilmiş olsa da, Tayvan'da TSMC tarafından üretilmektedir. Şimdiye kadar Kirin çipleri Huawei'deki HiSilicon bölümü tarafından tasarlandı ve ardından TSMC tarafından üretildi. Ancak, ABD'ye olan bağımlılığı kırmak için Çinli üretici şimdi biraz daha eski olan 14 nm'lik sürece geçmeye istekli (veya zorlandı). Testimiz, bu hareketin başarı getirip getiremeyeceğini gösterecek.

, , , , , ,
arama ilgisi
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Huawei P Smart 2021
İşlemci
HiSilicon Kirin 710A 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Grafik kartı
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Bellek
4096 MB 
Görüntü
6.67 inç 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, parlak: evet, 60 Hz
Harddisk
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB Boş
Bağlantılar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm audio port, Kart okuyucular: microSD cards up to 512 GB, 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: accelerometer, proximity sensor, compass, USB-C, OTG, FM radio
Network
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.1, LTE: FDD: B1 / B3 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B20 / B28, TDD:B38 / B40 / B41); UMTS: (B1 / B2 / B5 / B8); GSM: (B2 / B3 / B5 / B8), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 9.26 x 165.65 x 76.88
Batarya
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
İşletim sistemi
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8, 26mm, 1/2.0", 0.8µm) + 8 MP (f/2.4, 120˚) + 2 MP (f/2.4) + 2 MP (f/2.4), camera2 api: full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0)
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: mono speaker, Klavye: virtual, headset, charger, USB cable, EMUI 10.1, 24 Ay Garanti, SAR value: 0.85 W/​kg head, 1.15 W/​kg body, Widevine L3, fanless
Ağırlık
206 g, Güç kaynağı: 56 g
Fiyat
230 Euro
Bağlantılar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78 %
01/2021
Huawei P Smart 2021
Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4
206 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.67"2400x1080
82 %
09/2020
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
SD 732G, Adreno 618
215 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
75 %
12/2020
Samsung Galaxy A20s
SD 450, Adreno 506
183 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1560x720
83 %
06/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
79 %
01/2020
Oppo A91
Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.40"2400x1080
80 %
11/2020
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
SD 730G, Adreno 618
223 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.81"2400x1080
77 %
06/2020
Huawei P Smart 2020
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
163 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.21"2340x1080
Huawei P Smart 2021: Besides black, also available in the colors Crush Green and Blush Gold
Huawei P Smart 2021: Besides black, also available in the colors Crush Green and Blush Gold

Plastikten üretilen kasa, iyi işçilik gösterirken özellikle yüksek kaliteli bir görünüm sunmuyor. 9 milimetreden (~ 0,35 inç) fazla belirgin kalınlığı nedeniyle, P Smart 2021 de biraz tıknaz hissediyor. Nispeten ince çerçeveler - "çene" haricinde - ve delikli tasarım sayesinde, Huawei akıllı telefonun ekran-yüzey oranı neredeyse% 84,5 ve bu fiyat sınıfı için fena değil. sağlam işçilik gösterir ve iyi tanımlanmış bir basınç noktası sunar. Huawei akıllı telefonun suya veya toza karşı herhangi bir koruması yoktur.

Huawei P Smart 2021 Smartphone
Huawei P Smart 2021 Smartphone
Huawei P Smart 2021 Smartphone

Boyut Karşılaştırması

170 mm 78.1 mm 9.7 mm 223 g165.65 mm 76.88 mm 9.26 mm 206 g165.3 mm 76.8 mm 9.4 mm 215 g165.75 mm 76.68 mm 8.8 mm 209 g163.3 mm 77.5 mm 8 mm 183 g160.2 mm 73.3 mm 7.9 mm 172 g

Ekipman - 3,5 mm ses bağlantı noktasına sahip P Smart 2021

Huawei akıllı telefonun donanımı, bir FM radyo, çift SIM, 3,5 mm ses bağlantı noktası ve 128 GB kapasiteli eMMC depolama içerir. İşletim sistemini hesaba kattıktan sonra, kullanıcı için hala yaklaşık 109 GB kullanılabilir. Daha fazla depolama kapasitesine ihtiyaç duyanlar, depolamayı microSD kart ile 512 GB'a kadar genişletebilir, ancak bu dahili depolama olarak çalışmayacaktır. Ancak exFAT dosya sistemi desteklenmektedir. Orta seviye akıllı telefonların büyük 5000 mAh bataryası, USB Type-C bağlantı noktası üzerinden şarj edilebilir ve bu bağlantı, çevresel cihazlar için OTG ana bilgisayarı olarak da işlev görebilir.

Yazılım - GMS'siz Huawei akıllı telefon

P Smart 2021, işletim sistemi olarak EMUI 10.1 yüzeyi ile kaplanmış Android 10 ile birlikte teslim edilir. Test birimimizin güvenlik yamaları en son Ağustos 2020'de güncellendi.Çinli üreticiye uygulanan ABD yasağı nedeniyle Huawei P Smart 2021'in Google Hizmetleri ve Play Store olmadan yapılması gerekiyor. Ayrıca, Huawei akıllı telefonun DRM Widevine sertifikası L3 seviyesinde olduğundan, 6,67 inç ekranda yalnızca 480p veya 540p çözünürlükte DRM korumalı içeriği oynatabilirsiniz.

Huawei P Smart 2021 Smartphone
Huawei P Smart 2021 Smartphone
Huawei P Smart 2021 Smartphone
Huawei P Smart 2021 Smartphone

İletişim ve GPS - P Smart 2021, salyangoz hızında iletişim kurar

Huawei akıllı telefon, mobil İnternete LTE hızlarında erişir ve 5G seçeneği yoktur. Bu fiyat sınıfındaki akıllı telefonlar için her zaman olduğu gibi, P Smart 2021 tarafından desteklenen frekans bantlarının sayısı sınırlıdır. Orta seviye akıllı telefon yalnızca toplam 10 LTE bandı sunarken, bu ülkede (Almanya) kullanmak için hiçbir ödün vermenize gerek yok. Ayrıca P Smart 2021, Bluetooth sürüm 5.1'i destekler. Öte yandan, P Smart 2021, çevresel cihazlarla kablosuz iletişim için bir NFC çipinden yoksundur. WLAN modülü, 2,4 GHz frekans aralığında yalnızca IEEE-802.11 a / b / g standartlarıyla iletişim kurar. Buna karşılık, sırasıyla 70 Mbit / s ve 67 Mbit / s'de, Huawei akıllı telefon ile Netgear Nighthawk AX12 referans yönlendiricimiz arasındaki aktarım hızları, bu fiyat sınıfındaki bir akıllı telefon için çok düşük bir seviyededir.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
633 (589min - 676max) MBit/s ∼100% +845%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼87% +722%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=296, last 2 years)
398 MBit/s ∼63% +494%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
332 (312min - 337max) MBit/s ∼52% +396%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
326 (309min - 343max) MBit/s ∼52% +387%
Huawei P Smart 2021
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB eMMC Flash
67 (33min - 100max) MBit/s ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
28.3 (12min - 44max) MBit/s ∼4% -58%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
636 (500min - 675max) MBit/s ∼100% +806%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
619 (283min - 670max) MBit/s ∼97% +782%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=296, last 2 years)
405 MBit/s ∼64% +477%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
309 (140min - 360max) MBit/s ∼49% +340%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
294 (80min - 338max) MBit/s ∼46% +319%
Huawei P Smart 2021
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB eMMC Flash
70.2 (68min - 73max) MBit/s ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41.6 (28min - 58max) MBit/s ∼7% -41%
051015202530354045505560657075808590957072716972687270736970687268707168687171726870697070687069717072716972687270736970687268707168687171726870697070687069716665677264696566706470683310063686964465598676868676670667069Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø70 (68-73)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø67.1 (33-100)
GPS outdoors
GPS outdoors
GPS indoors
GPS indoors

Konum GPS, Galileo, GLONASS ve BeiDou uydu sistemleri aracılığıyla belirlenir. Pratikte test ünitemizin konum belirleme doğruluğunu değerlendirmek için karşılaştırma amacıyla Garmin Edge 500 ile paralel bir rota kaydediyoruz. GPS modülünün rotadan sapmaları küçüktür ve 12 kilometrelik (~ 7,5 mil) testin sonunda Huawei akıllı telefon ve navigasyon cihazı tarafından kaydedilen rotada yalnızca 180 metrelik (590 ft) bir fark vardır. rota.

GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Huawei P Smart 2021
GPS Huawei P Smart 2021
GPS Huawei P Smart 2021
GPS Huawei P Smart 2021
GPS Huawei P Smart 2021
GPS Huawei P Smart 2021

Telefon İşlevleri ve Ses Kalitesi - VoLTE'siz Huawei akıllı telefon?

Huawei P Smart 2021 Smartphone

P Smart 2021'i kullanan ses kalitesi iyi ve göze çarpmıyor. Sesler net bir şekilde yeniden üretilir. Çift SIM işlevine ek olarak, Huawei akıllı telefon WiFi-Aramayı destekler. Ancak, Ayarlar'da VoLTE için bir seçenek bulamadık.

Kameralar - Dört kameralı Huawei akıllı telefon

Picture taken with the front cam
Picture taken with the front cam

Selfie kamera 8 MP çözünürlüğe sahip ve bu fiyat sınıfına uygun bir kalite sunuyor ve multimedya içeriği ve anlık görüntüler için oldukça uygun. Renkler gerçekçi görünür ve bulanıklık sınırlar içinde kalır. Arkadaki dörtlü kamera kurulumunun ana sensörü f / 1.8 diyafram açıklığına ve 48 MP çözünürlüğe sahip. Fotoğraflar zaten gün ışığında pozlama ve odaklanma ile ilgili bazı sorunları gösteriyor. Daha kötü ışık koşullarında, görüntü keskinliği sorunları da kötüleşir. Bu, bu fiyat sınıfında bile daha iyi yapılabilir. Ek olarak, P Smart 2021, sırasıyla derinlik bilgilerini ve makro kayıtlarını hesaplamaktan sorumlu 8 MP geniş açılı bir lens ve iki 2 MP sensör sunar. Ultra geniş açılı lens kullanılabilir sonuçlar verirken, düşük bir seviyededir. Çoğunlukla kaydedilen resimlerin kontrastı zayıftır ve ayrıntılar bulanıklık, görüntü hataları ve çamurlu piksellerde kaybolur.

Ultrawide-angle
Ultrawide-angle
Wide-angle
Wide-angle
6x zoom (max)
6x zoom (max)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleLow LightWide-angleUltrawide-angle5x-Zoom
ColorChecker
13.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P Smart 2021: 8.59 ∆E min: 1.19 - max: 17.18 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.1 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
48.9 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
29 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
54.4 ∆E
27 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
29 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
37 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P Smart 2021: 36.5 ∆E min: 12.81 - max: 54.42 ∆E

Aksesuarlar ve Garanti - P Smart 2021 kılıfsız

Akıllı telefonun kutusu, modüler bir 22,5 Watt şarj cihazı, USB kablosu, SIM aracı, hızlı başlangıç kılavuzu ve kulaklık içerir. Huawei, akıllı telefonunda 24 aylık bir garanti sunuyor.

Giriş Cihazları ve Çalışması - Yüz tanıma kilidi özelliğine sahip Huawei akıllı telefon

Testimizde, kapasitif çoklu dokunmatik ekran, doğru kullanımdan memnun. Kilidi açmak için parmaklarınızı veya yüz tanıma yoluyla biyometrik tanımlamayı kullanabilirsiniz. P Smart 2021'in parmak izi sensörü, güç tuşunda gizlidir. Kilit açma mekanizmalarının hiçbiri çok hızlı olmasa da, ikisi de güvenilirdir.

Ekran - IPS panelli P Smart 2021

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

Üst merkezde bir delik bulunan 6,67 inç IPS ekran, 2400 x 1080 piksel çözünürlük ve yaklaşık 400 ppi piksel yoğunluğu sunuyor. Yakın görüş mesafesinde bile görüntü ve metin içeriği yeterince keskin görünüyor. 426 cd / m² ortalama, IPS ekranın maksimum parlaklığı, özellikle Xiaomi rakiplerine kıyasla biraz düşük. LCD ekranda aydınlık ve karanlık alanların eşit dağılımını simüle eden daha gerçekçi APL50 ölçümümüzde maksimum parlaklık 438 cd / m²'dir.

442
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 455 cd/m² Ortalama: 425.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.21 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 84 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 455 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1034:1 (Siyah: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Huawei P Smart 2021
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A20s
IPS, 1560x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Oppo A91
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
LTPS, 2400x1080, 6.81
Screen
-6%
-61%
16%
-114%
-49%
Brightness middle
455
623
37%
384
-16%
610
34%
594
31%
390
-14%
Brightness
426
600
41%
367
-14%
579
36%
613
44%
377
-12%
Brightness Distribution
84
93
11%
87
4%
92
10%
89
6%
93
11%
Black Level *
0.44
0.54
-23%
0.42
5%
0.37
16%
0.66
-50%
Contrast
1034
1154
12%
914
-12%
1649
59%
591
-43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.6
1.8
-13%
4.43
-177%
1.8
-13%
6.1
-281%
3.39
-112%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.9
4.7
-62%
7.34
-153%
3
-3%
10.6
-266%
5.22
-80%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.2
3.3
-50%
4.9
-123%
2.5
-14%
7
-218%
4.3
-95%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.26 97%
2.308 95%
2.31 95%
2.28 96%
2.506 88%
CCT
6868 95%
6712 97%
7671 85%
6864 95%
7370 88%
6033 108%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9689 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Arka plan aydınlatması nedeniyle, bir IPS paneli Oppo A91'deki gibi bir OLED panelin mükemmel siyah değerini asla elde edemez. Buna bağlı olarak, Huawei akıllı telefonda hala sağlam bir 1.000: 1 olan P Smart 2021'de daha düşük bir kontrast oranıyla yaşamak zorundasınız. APL-50 ölçümü, siyah değeri biraz artırıldığından (0,46 cd / m²) minimum düzeyde azaltılmış bir kontrast oranı gösterir. Ekranı bir fotoğraf spektrometresi ve CalMAN yazılımı kullanarak analiz ediyoruz. SRGB renk uzayından sapmalar çok düşüktür ve ekranın renk sıcaklığı da iyi kalibre edilmiştir.

Color accuracy (profile: Vivid, target color space: sRGB)
Color accuracy (profile: Vivid, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Vivid, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Vivid, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: Vivid, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: Vivid, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Vivid, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Vivid, target color space: sRGB)
Color accuracy (profile: Normal, target color space: sRGB)
Color accuracy (profile: Normal, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Normal, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Normal, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: Normal, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: Normal, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Normal, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Normal, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.3 ms).

Akıllı telefonu dış mekanda kullanırken parlaklığının düşük olması nedeniyle doğrudan güneş ışığından uzak durmanız gerekir. Aksi takdirde ekran içeriğini zorlukla okuyabilirsiniz. Ekrana yandan bakıldığında, parlaklıktaki azalma düşüktür ve görüş açıları uzun süre sabit kalır.

Performans - Kirin 710A ile Huawei akıllı telefon

HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Kirin 710'u temel alan ancak 14nm-FinFET işleminde üretilen sekiz çekirdekli bir SoC'dir. Kirin 960 ve 970 gibi, işlemci de 1.7 GHz saat hızına sahip büyük LITTLE mimarisinde dört Cortex A73 (2 GHz) ve dört Cortex A53 çekirdeğini entegre ediyor. Entegre grafik kartı, zayıf performansa sahip bir Mali-G51 MP4'tür. CPU kıyaslamalarında Kirin SoC, Snapdragon rakiplerinden önemli ölçüde daha düşük konumdadır. Kirin 710'a sahip bir Huawei P smart Pro bile, özellikle tek çekirdekli arenada genellikle P Smart 2021'in önüne geçer. GFXBench kıyaslamalarının grafik testinde de benzer bir resim kendini gösteriyor, ancak bir Adreno 618 ile olan performans farklılıkları daha da belirgin hale geliyor. P Smart 2021 genellikle bazı küçük gecikmeler gösteriyor ve tarayıcıda kaydırma dalgalı görünüyor, ancak Huawei akıllı telefon herhangi bir büyük hata göstermiyor. Açıkladığımız performansın Performans modunda elde edildiğini unutmamalısınız. Normal modun seçilmesiyle, test ünitemiz 1.7 GHz'de önemli ölçüde yavaşlar ve kısa bir süre sonra önemli ölçüde kısılma gösterir (bkz. Emisyonlar bölümü).

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
299 Points ∼53%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
330 Points ∼58% +10%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
567 Points ∼100% +90%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
159 Points ∼28% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
569 Points ∼100% +90%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
320 Points ∼56% +7%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
282 Points ∼50% -6%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
551 Points ∼97% +84%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (297 - 299, n=2)
298 Points ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=216, last 2 years)
559 Points ∼98% +87%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1332 Points ∼69%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1356 Points ∼70% +2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1787 Points ∼93% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
902 Points ∼47% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1771 Points ∼92% +33%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1475 Points ∼77% +11%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1430 Points ∼74% +7%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
1786 Points ∼93% +34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1312 - 1332, n=2)
1322 Points ∼69% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=216, last 2 years)
1925 Points ∼100% +45%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1017 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1090 Points ∼54% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
987 Points ∼49% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1017 - 1036, n=2)
1027 Points ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=108, last 2 years)
2030 Points ∼100% +100%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1045 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1291 Points ∼61% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
259 Points ∼12% -75%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
1113 Points ∼52% +7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1045 - 1050, n=2)
1048 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=112, last 2 years)
2124 Points ∼100% +103%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1422 Points ∼54%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1554 Points ∼59% +9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2638 Points ∼100% +86%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
778 Points ∼29% -45%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2556 Points ∼97% +80%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
1422 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (412 - 5099, n=80, last 2 years)
2508 Points ∼95% +76%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5211 Points ∼68%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
5443 Points ∼71% +4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7130 Points ∼93% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3998 Points ∼52% -23%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
6987 Points ∼91% +34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
5211 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1163 - 14895, n=80, last 2 years)
7674 Points ∼100% +47%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4766 Points ∼53%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
3896 Points ∼43% -18%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8962 Points ∼100% +88%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3349 Points ∼37% -30%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
8411 Points ∼94% +76%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
4766 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1673 - 12228, n=67, last 2 years)
6602 Points ∼74% +39%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8211 Points ∼82%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
9854 Points ∼99% +20%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8773 Points ∼88% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
5836 Points ∼59% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9091 Points ∼91% +11%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
9956 Points ∼100% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (7991 - 8211, n=2)
8101 Points ∼81% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=236, last 2 years)
9876 Points ∼99% +20%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7789 Points ∼95%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6993 Points ∼85% -10%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8101 Points ∼99% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
4493 Points ∼55% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7829 Points ∼96% +1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8185 Points ∼100% +5%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
7737 Points ∼95% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (6287 - 7789, n=2)
7038 Points ∼86% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=270, last 2 years)
7791 Points ∼95% 0%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19601 Points ∼48%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
21876 Points ∼53% +12%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
40955 Points ∼100% +109%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13203 Points ∼32% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38315 Points ∼94% +95%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
23447 Points ∼57% +20%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
39572 Points ∼97% +102%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (19493 - 19601, n=2)
19547 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=221, last 2 years)
39231 Points ∼96% +100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
23224 Points ∼41%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2177 Points ∼4% -91%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
56640 Points ∼100% +144%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12736 Points ∼22% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
51789 Points ∼91% +123%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
23159 Points ∼41% 0%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
53182 Points ∼94% +129%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (22844 - 23224, n=2)
23034 Points ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=221, last 2 years)
56434 Points ∼100% +143%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12601 Points ∼51%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
22398 Points ∼91% +78%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20797 Points ∼85% +65%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
15273 Points ∼62% +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20054 Points ∼82% +59%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
24514 Points ∼100% +95%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
20382 Points ∼83% +62%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (12601 - 12880, n=2)
12741 Points ∼52% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 59268, n=221, last 2 years)
22894 Points ∼93% +82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1525 Points ∼40%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1489 Points ∼39% -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3784 Points ∼100% +148%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
825 Points ∼22% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3534 Points ∼93% +132%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1899 Points ∼50% +25%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3556 Points ∼94% +133%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1454 - 1525, n=2)
1490 Points ∼39% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=260, last 2 years)
3314 Points ∼88% +117%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1493 Points ∼38%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1335 Points ∼34% -11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3917 Points ∼100% +162%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
701 Points ∼18% -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3620 Points ∼92% +142%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1767 Points ∼45% +18%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3678 Points ∼94% +146%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1326 - 1493, n=2)
1410 Points ∼36% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=260, last 2 years)
3889 Points ∼99% +160%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2332 Points ∼69%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2487 Points ∼74% +7%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3382 Points ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1672 Points ∼49% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3263 Points ∼96% +40%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2568 Points ∼76% +10%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3349 Points ∼99% +44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (2191 - 2332, n=2)
2262 Points ∼67% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=260, last 2 years)
2721 Points ∼80% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1573 Points ∼40%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1508 Points ∼38% -4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3918 Points ∼100% +149%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
817 Points ∼21% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3645 Points ∼93% +132%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1885 Points ∼48% +20%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3704 Points ∼95% +135%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1507 - 1573, n=2)
1540 Points ∼39% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=272, last 2 years)
3796 Points ∼97% +141%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1452 Points ∼30%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1342 Points ∼28% -8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4086 Points ∼85% +181%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
702 Points ∼15% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3785 Points ∼79% +161%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1747 Points ∼37% +20%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3773 Points ∼79% +160%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1359 - 1452, n=2)
1406 Points ∼29% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=272, last 2 years)
4779 Points ∼100% +229%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2511 Points ∼73%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2496 Points ∼73% -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1661 Points ∼48% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3226 Points ∼94% +28%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2606 Points ∼76% +4%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3352 Points ∼98% +33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (2441 - 2511, n=2)
2476 Points ∼72% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=270, last 2 years)
2839 Points ∼83% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1099 Points ∼41%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
999 Points ∼37% -9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2713 Points ∼100% +147%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
438 Points ∼16% -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2499 Points ∼92% +127%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1276 Points ∼47% +16%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2489 Points ∼92% +126%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1082 - 1099, n=2)
1091 Points ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=259, last 2 years)
2609 Points ∼96% +137%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
951 Points ∼34%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
845 Points ∼30% -11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2559 Points ∼92% +169%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
382 Points ∼14% -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2356 Points ∼85% +148%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1117 Points ∼40% +17%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2293 Points ∼83% +141%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (945 - 951, n=2)
948 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=259, last 2 years)
2778 Points ∼100% +192%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2338 Points ∼68%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2456 Points ∼71% +5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3436 Points ∼100% +47%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1702 Points ∼50% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3170 Points ∼92% +36%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2550 Points ∼74% +9%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3328 Points ∼97% +42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (2203 - 2338, n=2)
2271 Points ∼66% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=259, last 2 years)
2766 Points ∼81% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1123 Points ∼36%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
991 Points ∼32% -12%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2865 Points ∼93% +155%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
488 Points ∼16% -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2667 Points ∼86% +137%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1265 Points ∼41% +13%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2701 Points ∼87% +141%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1123 - 1136, n=2)
1130 Points ∼37% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=271, last 2 years)
3095 Points ∼100% +176%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
988 Points ∼29%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
875 Points ∼25% -11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2735 Points ∼79% +177%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
403 Points ∼12% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2539 Points ∼74% +157%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1102 Points ∼32% +12%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2471 Points ∼72% +150%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (987 - 988, n=2)
988 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=271, last 2 years)
3443 Points ∼100% +248%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2501 Points ∼73%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2478 Points ∼72% -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3438 Points ∼100% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1729 Points ∼50% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3236 Points ∼94% +29%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2621 Points ∼76% +5%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3391 Points ∼99% +36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (2411 - 2501, n=2)
2456 Points ∼71% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=271, last 2 years)
2896 Points ∼84% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1066 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2506 Points ∼95% +135%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
489 Points ∼19% -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2340 Points ∼89% +120%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1248 Points ∼47% +17%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2310 Points ∼88% +117%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1052 - 1066, n=2)
1059 Points ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 6977, n=212, last 2 years)
2638 Points ∼100% +147%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
911 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2427 Points ∼82% +166%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
402 Points ∼14% -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2250 Points ∼76% +147%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1103 Points ∼37% +21%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2199 Points ∼74% +141%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (911 - 914, n=2)
913 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 11259, n=212, last 2 years)
2976 Points ∼100% +227%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2298 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2827 Points ∼100% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2076 Points ∼73% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2721 Points ∼96% +18%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2304 Points ∼81% 0%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2775 Points ∼98% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (2225 - 2298, n=2)
2262 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=212, last 2 years)
2646 Points ∼94% +15%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
36 fps ∼60%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
35 fps ∼58% -3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
33 fps ∼55% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +67%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
57 fps ∼95% +58%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
36 fps ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=219, last 2 years)
55.7 fps ∼93% +55%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
40 fps ∼39%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
39 fps ∼38% -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
91 fps ∼88% +128%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
22 fps ∼21% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
85 fps ∼83% +113%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
86 fps ∼83% +115%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
40 fps ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=219, last 2 years)
103 fps ∼100% +158%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
15 fps ∼34%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
14 fps ∼32% -7%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼77% +127%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
17 fps ∼39% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼89% +160%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
38 fps ∼87% +153%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
15 fps ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=217, last 2 years)
43.9 fps ∼100% +193%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼32%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
18 fps ∼30% -5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
45 fps ∼75% +137%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
9.4 fps ∼16% -51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼68% +116%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
42 fps ∼70% +121%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
19 fps ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=218, last 2 years)
60.1 fps ∼100% +216%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.9 fps ∼23%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
12 fps ∼35% +52%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28 fps ∼82% +254%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13 fps ∼38% +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼85% +267%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
27 fps ∼79% +242%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
7.9 fps ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=215, last 2 years)
34.3 fps ∼100% +334%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
13 fps ∼32%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
14 fps ∼34% +8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
33 fps ∼80% +154%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.9 fps ∼17% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼73% +131%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
30 fps ∼73% +131%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
13 fps ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=215, last 2 years)
41.2 fps ∼100% +217%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.1 fps ∼33%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.4 fps ∼30% -10%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼79% +139%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.6 fps ∼31% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼79% +139%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
16 fps ∼74% +125%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
7.1 fps ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=214, last 2 years)
21.5 fps ∼100% +203%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8.1 fps ∼33%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7.7 fps ∼31% -5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
19 fps ∼77% +135%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.6 fps ∼15% -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼73% +122%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
17 fps ∼69% +110%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
8.1 fps ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=214, last 2 years)
24.7 fps ∼100% +205%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.7 fps ∼31%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.1 fps ∼28% -9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼83% +169%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.3 fps ∼29% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼79% +154%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
7.5 fps ∼35% +12%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
16 fps ∼74% +139%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (6.7 - 6.8, n=2)
6.75 fps ∼31% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=275, last 2 years)
21.6 fps ∼100% +222%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.6 fps ∼31%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7 fps ∼28% -8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20 fps ∼81% +163%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.6 fps ∼15% -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼73% +137%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8.8 fps ∼36% +16%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
18 fps ∼73% +137%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (7.6 - 7.6, n=2)
7.6 fps ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=275, last 2 years)
24.7 fps ∼100% +225%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.4 fps ∼31%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2.3 fps ∼16% -48%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼77% +150%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.8 fps ∼27% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼77% +150%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
4.5 fps ∼31% +2%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
10 fps ∼70% +127%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (4.4 - 4.5, n=2)
4.45 fps ∼31% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=276, last 2 years)
14.3 fps ∼100% +225%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.8 fps ∼29%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4 fps ∼41% +43%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7.5 fps ∼76% +168%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1.4 fps ∼14% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.9 fps ∼70% +146%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2.9 fps ∼30% +4%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
6.3 fps ∼64% +125%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (2.8 - 2.9, n=2)
2.85 fps ∼29% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=275, last 2 years)
9.81 fps ∼100% +250%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
169704 Points ∼51%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
194475 Points ∼58% +15%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
279048 Points ∼84% +64%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
90185 Points ∼27% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
271934 Points ∼81% +60%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
251673 Points ∼75% +48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
169704 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=179, last 2 years)
333830 Points ∼100% +97%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1221 Score ∼37%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2373 Score ∼72% +94%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
1221 Score ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 7649, n=56, last 2 years)
3290 Score ∼100% +169%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2173 Points ∼61%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2258 Points ∼64% +4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3477 Points ∼98% +60%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1249 Points ∼35% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3444 Points ∼97% +58%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3412 Points ∼96% +57%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
2173 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=203, last 2 years)
3537 Points ∼100% +63%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4934 Points ∼72%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
5134 Points ∼75% +4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
6542 Points ∼95% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2783 Points ∼41% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6856 Points ∼100% +39%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
6612 Points ∼96% +34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
4934 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=203, last 2 years)
6490 Points ∼95% +32%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2772 Points ∼62%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2913 Points ∼65% +5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4041 Points ∼91% +46%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1182 Points ∼27% -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4452 Points ∼100% +61%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
4029 Points ∼90% +45%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
2772 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=203, last 2 years)
4139 Points ∼93% +49%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1572 Points ∼29%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1476 Points ∼27% -6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3960 Points ∼73% +152%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
984 Points ∼18% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3757 Points ∼69% +139%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3984 Points ∼73% +153%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
1572 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=203, last 2 years)
5461 Points ∼100% +247%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1023 Points ∼73%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1179 Points ∼85% +15%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1395 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
981 Points ∼70% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1226 Points ∼88% +20%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
1347 Points ∼97% +32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
1023 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=203, last 2 years)
1249 Points ∼90% +22%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
52.591 Points ∼100% +75%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
50.582 Points ∼96% +68%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=185, last 2 years)
49.7 Points ∼95% +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
47.901 Points ∼91% +59%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)
30.129 Points ∼57%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
30.1 Points ∼57% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)
15.983 Points ∼30% -47%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
90.555 Points ∼100% +87%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=193, last 2 years)
88.2 Points ∼97% +82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
86.75 Points ∼96% +79%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
86.541 Points ∼96% +79%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
48.5 Points ∼54% 0%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)
48.473 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)
22.442 Points ∼25% -54%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=163, last 2 years)
50.9 runs/min ∼100% +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
45.2 runs/min ∼89% +67%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
43.9 runs/min ∼86% +62%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
43.3 runs/min ∼85% +60%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)
27.1 runs/min ∼53%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
27.1 runs/min ∼53% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
12.4 runs/min ∼24% -54%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=204, last 2 years)
77.3 Points ∼100% +41%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
72 Points ∼93% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
71 Points ∼92% +29%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
68 Points ∼88% +24%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)
55 Points ∼71%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
55 Points ∼71% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)
29 Points ∼38% -47%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
17398 Points ∼100% +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
17265 Points ∼99% +94%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=213, last 2 years)
17006 Points ∼98% +91%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
16729 Points ∼96% +88%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)
8911 Points ∼51%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
8911 Points ∼51% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)
3982 Points ∼23% -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)
11620.2 ms * ∼100% -163%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)
4411.23 ms * ∼38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
4411 ms * ∼38% -0%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=216, last 2 years)
4242 ms * ∼37% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
2850.1 ms * ∼25% +35%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
2783.1 ms * ∼24% +37%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
2672.8 ms * ∼23% +39%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P Smart 2021Xiaomi Poco X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy A20sXiaomi Redmi Note 9 ProOppo A91Motorola Moto G9 PlusAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
24%
-24%
24%
10%
28%
-9%
51%
Sequential Read 256KB
308.11
505.96
64%
298.23
-3%
498.15
62%
505.44
64%
489.37
59%
289 (107 - 501, n=37)
-6%
728 (41.9 - 2037, n=281, last 2 years)
136%
Sequential Write 256KB
183.29
173.09
-6%
90.59
-51%
171.09
-7%
185.26
1%
186.23
2%
191 (90 - 314, n=37)
4%
313 (11.9 - 1321, n=281, last 2 years)
71%
Random Read 4KB
92.39
123.43
34%
75.87
-18%
122.58
33%
145.64
58%
134.77
46%
77.1 (20.7 - 247, n=37)
-17%
130 (13.5 - 325, n=281, last 2 years)
41%
Random Write 4KB
67.23
112.55
67%
12.95
-81%
112.93
68%
28.55
-58%
98.12
46%
44.9 (8.48 - 151, n=37)
-33%
114 (4.97 - 330, n=281, last 2 years)
70%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
75.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-1%
82.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
76.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
77.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
1%
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
78 (29.2 - 154, n=33)
2%
76 (13.4 - 154, n=183, last 2 years)
0%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
55.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-14%
65.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
54.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-15%
60.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
62.5 (26.1 - 81.9, n=33)
-3%
58 (1.7 - 83.3, n=183, last 2 years)
-10%

Games - Can you use the P Smart 2021 for gaming?

While you are able to play some graphically demanding games such as "PUBG Mobile" smoothly with the P Smart 2021, 30 fps are the limit. It is not possible to play the shooter game in the best graphics settings. Due to the lack of Google Services, besides apps, some games such as "Asphalt 9 Legends" or "Dead Trigger 2" are also not supported.

We also look at some less demanding games in more detail using the GameBench app. Here, the Mali-G51 MP4 is able to achieve a relatively even frame rate close to the native 60-Hz limit of the panel.

Real Racing 3
Real Racing 3
PUBG mobile
PUBG mobile
Armajet
Armajet
PUBG mobile
0510152025303030303029313030283130303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302931283130303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303029313030283130303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302931283130303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030263030303031293030303030303030303030303030303030303030303028313030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303029313030283130303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302931283130303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030263030303031293030303030303030303030303030303030303030303028313030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302930303030303029313030293030303029312930302931302924242928303030303029303030303030303030292930302930282830293030303030293030303030303030303030303030303030313030293030303030303030303030303030303030303030302931303030293130303030293030303030303030303030303030Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø30 (28-31)
; Balanced: Ø29.9 (26-31)
; HD: Ø29.8 (24-31)
Armajet
05101520253035404550556060595860606060606060606060605959606060605759606060605960606060596060606060596060606060606053556060606058605860596060606060606060606060606060606058606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060586057595759606060606060606060606060606060606060605959606059586060575560606060606059595760605959595860575457596056575759606060606060606059606059605258575755575554525255546060605860Tooltip
: Ø59.2 (52-60)
Real Racing 3
0510152025303540455055605960606060606060606059595960606060595960606060606054606058555653525657595959606060606060606060606060606060606060606060605960606060606060606060606060606060605860603859585959596060Tooltip
: Ø59.1 (38-60)

Emissions - P Smart 2021 with low heat

Temperature

The surface temperatures range at uncritical levels, and even under load, the surface never becomes uncomfortably hot. However, what is more interesting is the heat development inside the P Smart 2021. 

In order to evaluate the heat development under constant load, we use the battery test of the GFXBench app. The Manhattan 3.1 test shows that with increasing load, the frame rate of the Kirin 710A only remains stable in Performance mode. 

Normal mode
Normal mode
Normal mode
Normal mode
Normal mode
Normal mode
Normal mode
Normal mode
Performance mode
Performance mode
Performance mode
Performance mode
Performance mode
Performance mode
Performance mode
Performance mode
Maksimum yük
 33.3 °C33.7 °C31 °C 
 33.2 °C31.6 °C32 °C 
 33.3 °C32.1 °C32.1 °C 
Maksimum: 33.7 °C
Ortalama: 32.5 °C
29.4 °C29.1 °C30.6 °C
29.2 °C29.8 °C32.6 °C
29.4 °C30.5 °C32.2 °C
Maksimum: 32.6 °C
Ortalama: 30.3 °C
Güç kaynağı  26.3 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Speaker

Speaker test
Speaker test

In everyday operation, the mono speaker located at the bottom of the device produces a high maximum volume of 91 dB. As expected, the sound spectrum is dominated by sounds in the mid and high frequency range, and even lower mids are hardly reproduced. 

While the 3.5-mm audio port permits a more bass-heavy sound reproduction, the noise level is somewhat pronounced at an SNR value of 75. Those who prefer a wireless connection via Bluetooth 5.1 should note that neither the LDAC nor the aptX or aptX HD codecs are supported.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.440.12523.331.73126344022.632.15034.532.76319.9348014.734.410014.438.112514.93816017.839.820018.941.425011.749.231513.952.14001362.450010.365.463010.469.380012.473.7100011.178.4125011.277.7160012.776.4200012.378250012.679.9315012.782.4400012.784.5500012.780.5630013.572.180001468.71000013.571.81250014.969.6160001657.7SPL24.891N0.680.5median 12.7median 69.6Delta11230.530.121.326.518.425.822.52420.328.115.828.315.728.616.728.315.133.11550.410.651.114.155.410.862.310.962.410.567.28.8691071.110.173.111.176.111.979.61180.512.180.812.57812.778.313.478.913.874.21571.11467.814.162.814.162.424.489.20.574.8median 12.5median 69210.1hearing rangehide median