Notebookcheck

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro İncelemesi: Ucuz fiyatına karşın özelliklerle dolu

Repeat offender. Xiaomi, ucuz ve iyi donanımlı orta sınıf akıllı telefonlarla rekabeti sarsmaya çalışıyor. Redmi Note 9 Pro ile Xiaomi, belirlenen fiyat noktalarının dişlilerine bir İngiliz anahtarı daha attı. 250 Euro'luk (~ 282 $) bir MSRP için, 6.67 inç akıllı telefon 64 MP dört kamera ve devasa bir pil ile geliyor. İncelememiz, bir satın alma işleminin değerli olup olmadığını gösterecektir.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn,

Redmi Note 9S'den sonra, Xiaomi şimdi Redmi Note 9 Pro şeklinde heyecan verici bir cep telefonu daha yayınladı. Nispeten ucuz bir fiyata, Xiaomi bir kez daha birçok özelliğe sahip büyük bir akıllı telefon sunuyor. Redmi Note 9 Pro, üst orta menzilli segmenti hedefliyor. 2400x1080 piksel, 6 GB LPDDR4X RAM, sekiz çekirdekli Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SoC ve etkileyici 5020 mAh pil ile 6.67 inç IPS ekran Redmi Note 9 Pro'nun ana bileşenleri 64 GB depolama alanına sahip Redmi Note 9 Pro'nun yapılandırmamız 250 Euro'dan (~ 282 $) satın alınabilir. 128 GB'lık varyant 299 Euro (~ 337 $) karşılığında satılıyor.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Redmi Note Seri)
İşlemci
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G 8 x 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Grafik kartı
Qualcomm Adreno 618
Bellek
6144 MB 
Görüntü
6.67 inç 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, FHD+, parlak: evet, 60 Hz
Harddisk
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB 
, 45.1 GB Boş
Bağlantılar
1 USB 2.0, Ses çıkışları: 3.5-mm headphone jack, Kart okuyucular: microSD up to 512 GB (FAT, FAT32, and exFAT), 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: Linear Z-axis vibration motor, proximity sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, electronic compass, IR blaster, Wi-Fi direct, USB OTG, DRM Widevine Level 1, Camera2 API Level 3
Network
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (Band 2, 3, 5, 8), UMTS (bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41), head SAR 0.662 W/kg, body SAR 1.021 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 8.8 x 165.75 x 76.68
Batarya
5020 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
İşletim sistemi
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix Quad-camera: 64-MP main optics (autofocus, f/1.89, 1/1.72", 0.8µm) + 8-MP ultra-wide (f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm) + 5-MP macro (f/2.4, 1/5", 1.12µm) + 2-MP depth information (f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75µm), video at up to [email protected], slow-motion @720p960FPS
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.48, 1.0µm, slow-motion selfie @120fps
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: Mono speaker on the bottom edge, Klavye: virtual, modular 33-watt charger, USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), SIM tool, protective case, quick-start guide, warranty information, MIUI 11, 24 Ay Garanti, fanless
Ağırlık
209 g, Güç kaynağı: 40 g
Fiyat
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83 %
06/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80 %
01/2020
Samsung Galaxy A51
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.5"2400x1080
81 %
10/2019
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4
200 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.53"2340x1080
80 %
06/2020
realme 6 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
195 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.6"2400x1080
79 %
01/2020
Oppo A91
Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.4"2400x1080
81 %
05/2020
Huawei P40 Lite
Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6
183 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2310x1080

Kasa - 6,67 inç Form Faktörü, İyi Yapı Kalitesi, Sağlam

Xiaomi Mi serisi üst düzey kullanıcılara yönelikken, Redmi serisi giriş seviyesi ve orta seviye segmentleri kapsar. Redmi Note 9 Pro, cam arka gibi lüks özelliklere sahip olmasa da, bu ilk bakışta fark edilmez.Ayrıca, akıllı telefonun görünümü, parlak arka kapak ve yuvarlatılmış kenarlar ve köşeler oldukça premium bir tasarıma sahiptir. Test cihazımız bir "buzul beyazı" arka kapağa sahiptir ve "yıldızlararası gri" ve "tropikal yeşil" renk çeşidi de mevcuttur. Benzer şekilde, Redmi 9 Pro hissi güzel tasarımıyla eşleşir. 209 gram (~ 7.37 oz) ağırlığında, ele iyi oturur ve malzeme geçişleri zar zor fark edilir. Ek olarak, ekran, çerçeve ve arka kapak az miktarda direnç sunar. Sonuç olarak, 6.67 inçlik cihaz asla elden kayacak kadar pürüzsüz hissetmez. Xiaomi akıllı telefon çok sağlamdır ve baskı altında bükülme veya verim olasılığı düşüktür.

Boyut Karşılaştırma

165.75 mm 76.68 mm 8.8 mm 209 g163.8 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 195 g161.35 mm 76.4 mm 8.79 mm 200 g160.2 mm 73.3 mm 7.9 mm 172 g159.2 mm 76.3 mm 8.7 mm 183 g158.5 mm 73.6 mm 7.9 mm 172 g

Özellikler - NFC ve IR Blaster

Redmi Note 9S'den farklı olarak, Redmi Note 9 Pro dahili depolama kapasitesinden bağımsız olarak her zaman 6 GB RAM ile donatılmıştır. Bu arada, bellek hızları aynıdır: Redmi Note 9 Pro'nun 64 GB veya 128 GB depolama alanı, bu fiyat sınıfında verilmeyen UFS hızlarında da çalışır. Bununla birlikte, bellek kriterlerimiz, Xiaomi'nin UFS 2.1 depolama alanına atıfta bulunmasına rağmen, sadece UFS 2.0 depolama alanı kullanıldığını gösteriyor. Dahili depolama, exFAT dosya sistemine formatlanabilen 512 GB'a kadar kapasiteye sahip bir microSD kart ile genişletilebilir. Ancak, uygulama verileri üzerinden aktarılamadık. Akıllı telefonun hem microSD kart hem de iki nano SIM kart için yer olması dikkat çekicidir. Redmi Note 9 Pro'nun USB Type-C bağlantı noktasının sadece USB 2.0 hızlarında çalışması gerçeği düşük fiyatın bir sonucudur. Neyse ki, telefonun bütçe doğası diğer alanlarda belirgin değil ve bir kulaklık jakı ve IR blaster var, ikincisi uygun bir ekstra.

Left: microSD & dual SIM card slot
Left: microSD & dual SIM card slot
Right: power button with integrated fingerprint sensor, volume rocker
Right: power button with integrated fingerprint sensor, volume rocker
Top: microphone, IR blaster
Top: microphone, IR blaster
Bottom: 3.5-mm headphone jack, USB Type-C 2.0, microphone, speaker
Bottom: 3.5-mm headphone jack, USB Type-C 2.0, microphone, speaker

Yazılım - Redmi Note 9 Pro için Android 10 ve MIUI 11

Redmi Note 9 Pro, Xiaomi 10'un kendi kullanıcı arayüzü MIUI 11 ile Android 10'u çalıştırıyor. Yazma sırasında (Haziran sonu), en son güvenlik yamaları 1 Nisan'a kadar uzanıyor ve bu da onları oldukça yeni hale getiriyor. küçük bir araç kutusu olan Xiaomi, ROM'a Facebook, Netflix ve AliExpress gibi birkaç bloatware uygulaması da ekledi. Ancak, gerekmedikçe hepsi kaldırılabilir.Redmi Note 9 Pro, DRM Widevine düzey 1'i destekleyerek kullanıcıların Netflix gibi akış hizmetlerinden HD video içeriği akışına izin verir.

İletişim ve GPS - Süper Hızlı Wi-Fi

GSM ve UMTS'ye ek olarak, Redmi Note 9 Pro aynı zamanda 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 ve 41 LTE bantlarını da destekler, yani küresel kullanım için tam olarak tasarlanmamıştır . Bununla birlikte, Avrupalı kullanıcılar herhangi bir sorun yaşamamalıdır. 6.67 inçlik akıllı telefon, NFC, Bluetooth 5.0 ve MIMO uyumlu Wi-Fi 5 (Wi-Fi 802.11ac) kısa menzilli iletişim standartlarını destekliyor. Referans yönlendirici Netgear Nighthawk AX12 ile gerçek dünya testinde, akıllı telefon mükemmel ve oldukça tutarlı indirme ve yükleme hızlarına ulaşıyor. Sonuç olarak, Wi-Fi hızları tüm rakiplerine göre çok daha yüksek.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
619 (min: 283, max: 670) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
353 (min: 330, max: 362) MBit/s ∼57% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
298 (min: 185, max: 350) MBit/s ∼48% -52%
Huawei P40 Lite
Mali-G52 MP6, Kirin 810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
298 (min: 61, max: 334) MBit/s ∼48% -52%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
294 (min: 80, max: 338) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 (min: 145, max: 352) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=553)
264 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
551 (min: 465, max: 583) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei P40 Lite
Mali-G52 MP6, Kirin 810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 (min: 286, max: 403) MBit/s ∼61% -39%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
332 (min: 312, max: 337) MBit/s ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
319 (min: 302, max: 325) MBit/s ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (min: 189, max: 335) MBit/s ∼54% -46%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 (min: 137, max: 336) MBit/s ∼53% -47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=553)
250 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø609 (283-670)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø551 (465-583)
GPS signal indoors
GPS signal indoors
GPS signal outdoors
GPS signal outdoors

Redmi Note 9 Pro, GPS, Galileo, GLONASS ve BeiDou uydu navigasyon ağları üzerinden mevcut konumu belirler. Süreç iç mekanlarda biraz zaman alsa da, bizi yaklaşık 25 saniye sonra üç metre içinde doğru bir şekilde bulabilir. Dış mekanlarda, hassasiyet aynıdır, uydu yukarı bağlantısı sadece birkaç saniye sürer.Gerçek dünya navigasyon testimizde, Xiaomi akıllı telefon da takdire şayan bir performans sergiliyor. Profesyonel navi Garmin Edge 500 ile karşılaştırıldığında 12 kilometrelik bisiklet yolculuğumuzda daha açık alanların aksine yoğun konut alanlarında konumumuzu biraz daha düşük bir hassasiyetle takip ederken, doğruluk hala nispeten yüksektir. Günlük navigasyon görevlerini yerine getirmekten daha fazlasıdır.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: Overview
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: Overview
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: Lake
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: Lake
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: Turn
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: Turn
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Lake
Garmin Edge 500: Lake
Garmin Edge 500: Turn
Garmin Edge 500: Turn

Telefon ve Çağrı Kalitesi - Vomi ve Wi-Fi ile Arama ile Redmi Note 9 Pro

Redmi Note 9 Pro'nun SIM tepsisi, her ikisi de 4G bağlantısı için kullanılabilen iki nano SIM kartı kabul eder. VoLTE ve Wi-Fi aramaları desteklenmektedir. Akıllı telefonun arama kalitesi iyi. Ancak, hem kulaklık hem de hoparlör görüşmeler sırasında biraz donuk geliyor. Buna karşılık, Redmi Note 9 Pro ortam gürültüsünü güvenilir bir şekilde filtreler.

Kameralar - Dar Dinamik Aralıklı 64 MP Dört Kameralı Sistem

Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera

Önceki Redmi Note 8 Pro ile karşılaştırıldığında, Redmi Note 9 Pro'nun kamera kurulumu neredeyse değişmedi. Hala 64 MP çözünürlüklü dört kameralı bir sistem var. Ana kamera, bitişik dört pikseli tek piksel pikseli olarak birleştirir ve bu da varsayılan çözünürlüğü 16 MP'dir. Kamera ayarları ile maksimum çözünürlükte resimler için 64 MP modu da kullanılabilir. 64 MP ana kameraya ek olarak (f / 1.89, 1 / 1.72 ", 0.8 µm) 8 MP vardır ultra geniş açılı lens (f / 2.2, 1 / 4.0 ", 1.12µm), 5 MP makro lens (f / 2.4, 1/5", 1.12µm) ve derinlik bilgisi için 2-MP sensör (f /2.4, 1/5 ", 1.75um). Redmi Note 8 Pro ile karşılaştırıldığında farklar şu şekildedir: Önceki modelin makro lensinin çözünürlüğü sadece 2 MP'dir. Buna karşılık, nominal olarak biraz daha yüksek çözünürlük için 20 MP selfie kamera ile birlikte gelir. Redmi Note 9'da 16 MP'lik bir sensör ön tarafı kaplar.

Picture taken with the selfie camera (all filters at maximum)
Picture taken with the selfie camera (all filters at maximum)

Gün ışığında, dörtlü kamera kurulumu, kontrast açısından yetersiz olan düzgün ve keskin fotoğraflar çeker (1'den 4'e kadar olan sahneler), bu da onları biraz düz gösterir. Dahası, akıllı telefonun dinamik aralığı subpar'tır ve görüntünün çok parlak ve çok karanlık kısımlarında ayrıntıların kaybolmasına neden olur. Gece çekimleri de çok etkileyici değil (sahne 5), çünkü kamera bu disiplinde çok iyi bir iş yapmıyor. Redmi Note 9 Pro hala fiyata göre genel olarak iyi kalitede fotoğraflar çekebiliyor. Bu, iyi fotoğraflar çeken selfie kamerayı da içeriyor.Ana kamera saniyede 4K ve 30 kareye kadar veya Full HD ve 60 FPS'ye kadar kayıt yapabilir. Selfie kamera, ana kameranınkine benzer saygın bir görüntü kalitesiyle Full HD ve 30 FPS'ye kadar videolar kaydeder.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 25-facher ZoomUltraweitwinkelLowlight-Umgebung

Kontrollü aydınlatma koşulları, Redmi Note 9'un ideal renk sunumundan biraz uzakta olduğunu ortaya koyuyor. Her ne kadar akıllı telefon simüle edilmiş gün ışığında (üst ColorChecker kartı) kırmızı tonları görüntülerken en iyi durumda olsa da, referans renkleri gösterme konusunda hala önemli ölçüde işareti kaçırıyor. Kötü ışıklandırmada (alt renk kartı) renk doğruluğu çok daha yüksek olsa da, bu durum genel olarak düşük görüntü kalitesini telafi etmez. Xiaomi akıllı telefon, test grafiğimizi yeterli derecede keskinlikle yakalamayı başardı.

ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
35 ∆E
42 ∆E
58 ∆E
48.7 ∆E
32 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
57.7 ∆E
59.4 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
30.1 ∆E
62.6 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
42 ∆E
64.9 ∆E
64.9 ∆E
49 ∆E
36 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: 41.94 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 64.93 ∆E
ColorChecker
3.6 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
0.8 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: 5.91 ∆E min: 0.82 - max: 11.17 ∆E

Aksesuarlar ve Garanti - 33 Watt Hızlı Şarj Cihazı Dahil

Xiaomi, Redmi Note 9 Pro'nun teslimat kapsamında bir modüler 33 watt şarj cihazı, bir USB kablosu (Tip-A - Tip-C), bir SIM aracı ve koruyucu bir kılıf içeriyordu. Paket ayrıca hızlı başlangıç kılavuzu ve garanti bilgileri içeren bir broşür içerir. Xiaomi, Redmi Note 9 Pro'nun alıcılarına 24 ay garanti veriyor.

Giriş cihazları

Redmi Note 9 Pro, sekiz çekirdekli Snapdragon 720G SoC sayesinde çok akıcı bir kullanıcı deneyimi sunuyor. Temel olarak 6.67 inç dokunmatik ekranı ve önceden uygulanmış ekran koruyucusunu içeren kesintisiz giriş cihazları ile tamamlanmaktadır. Aynı şey, akıllı telefonun güvenilir bir şekilde kilidini açan güç düğmesindeki parmak izi sensörü için de geçerlidir - daha önce, parmak izi sensörü Redmi Note 8 Pro'nun arkasında yer alıyordu. Alternatif olarak, Redmi Note 9 Pro'nun kilidi yüz tanıma ile de açılabilir. Ancak, yalnızca 2B yüz verileri kullanır.

Keyboard portrait mode
Keyboard portrait mode
Keyboard landscape mode
Keyboard landscape mode

Ekran - Yüksek Renk Doğruluğu ile Varsayılan Renk Modu

Subpixel array
Subpixel array

IPS ekranın 2400x1080 piksel çözünürlüğü orta menzilli cihazlar arasında yaygınlaşmaya başlıyor ve bu durumda 395 PPI'lık yüksek piksel yoğunluğuna dönüşüyor. Panel, varsayılan ayar olan ortam ışığı sensörü etkinken 578,6 cd / m²'lik oldukça yüksek bir ortalama parlaklığa ulaşır. Akıllı telefon, maksimum parlaklığı 572 cd / m² olan aydınlık ve karanlık alanların (APL50) eşit dağılımını gösterirken, ortam ışığı sensörünün devre dışı bırakılması 449 cd / m²'lik daha düşük bir parlaklığa neden olur. Ekranın parlaklığını kontrol etmek için (PWM) düğmesine basın. Bununla birlikte, PWM titremesi sadece% 43 ve altındaki parlaklık seviyelerinde gerçekleşir. O zaman bile, 2404 Hz frekansı o kadar yüksektir ki hassas kullanıcılar bile bundan etkilenmemelidir.

575
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
578
cd/m²
563
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
559
cd/m²
578
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 610 cd/m² Ortalama: 578.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.25 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 92 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 610 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1649:1 (Siyah: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A51
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
realme 6 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6
Oppo A91
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4
Huawei P40 Lite
IPS, 2310x1080, 6.4
Screen
-34%
-65%
-86%
-112%
-43%
Brightness middle
610
589
-3%
669
10%
442
-28%
594
-3%
478
-22%
Brightness
579
589
2%
630
9%
419
-28%
613
6%
448
-23%
Brightness Distribution
92
94
2%
87
-5%
90
-2%
89
-3%
87
-5%
Black Level *
0.37
0.42
-14%
0.37
-0%
0.49
-32%
Contrast
1649
1593
-3%
1195
-28%
976
-41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.8
2.22
-23%
4.8
-167%
6.1
-239%
6.1
-239%
3
-67%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3
8.24
-175%
9
-200%
9.7
-223%
10.6
-253%
5.6
-87%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
2.6
-4%
6.2
-148%
5.9
-136%
7
-180%
4.1
-64%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.111 104%
2.24 98%
2.35 94%
2.28 96%
2.26 97%
CCT
6864 95%
6508 100%
7846 83%
7631 85%
7370 88%
7282 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2404 Hz ≤ 43 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2404 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 43 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2404 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18099 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Spektrofotometre ile akıllı telefona daha yakından bakmak ve CalMAN yazılımı olumlu izlenimlerimizi doğrular. Redmi Note 9, tüm IPS panelinde büyük kontrastlar ve eşit aydınlatma ile parlıyor. "Standart" renk profili en yüksek renk doğruluğunu sunar. Buna karşılık, "otomatik" (varsayılan ayar) ve "artırılmış kontrast" modları işareti büyük bir farkla kaçırır ve ayrıca hafif bir mavi renk tonu eşlik eder. Ancak, bunlar daha renkli bir deneyim arayan kullanıcılar için doğru ayarlardır.

Color accuracy (color profile automatic, target color space sRGB)
Color accuracy (color profile automatic, target color space sRGB)
Color space (color profile automatic, target color space sRGB)
Color space (color profile automatic, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (color profile automatic, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (color profile automatic, target color space sRGB)
Saturation sweeps (color profile automatic, target color space sRGB)
Saturation sweeps (color profile automatic, target color space sRGB)
Color accuracy (color profile increased contrast, target color space sRGB)
Color accuracy (color profile increased contrast, target color space sRGB)
Color space (color profile increased contrast, target color space sRGB)
Color space (color profile increased contrast, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (color profile increased contrast, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (color profile increased contrast, target color space sRGB)
Saturation sweeps (color profile increased contrast, target color space sRGB)
Saturation sweeps (color profile increased contrast, target color space sRGB)
Color accuracy (color profile standard, target color space sRGB)
Color accuracy (color profile standard, target color space sRGB)
Color space (color profile standard, target color space sRGB)
Color space (color profile standard, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (color profile standard, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (color profile standard, target color space sRGB)
Saturation sweeps (color profile standard, target color space sRGB)
Saturation sweeps (color profile standard, target color space sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.2 ms).

Yüksek parlaklığı sayesinde Redmi Note 9 Pro, dış mekan kullanımı için çok uygundur. Her zaman olduğu gibi, ekranı okumayı önemli ölçüde zorlaştıran parlamayı ve yansımaları önlemek için doğrudan güneş ışığından kaçınılmalıdır. Bununla birlikte, ekran içeriği bu durumda bile görünmeye devam eder. IPS panelini çok dik bir açıdan izlemek, renklerin bozulmasına neden olmaz. Bunun yerine, bu sadece algılanan parlaklığı azaltır, bu gerçekten bir sorun değildir.

Outdoor use in sunny weather (adaptive brightness)
Outdoor use in sunny weather (adaptive brightness)
Outdoor use in sunny weather (maximum brightness)
Outdoor use in sunny weather (maximum brightness)

Performans - Snapdragon 720G sayesinde Yüksek Performans

Sekiz çekirdekli Snapdragon 720G SoC, Adreno 618 grafik birimi ve 6 GB LPDDR4X RAM'in kombinasyonu, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro'yu hızlı bir orta menzilli akıllı telefona dönüştürdü. günlük kullanım içindir, ancak karşılaştırmamızdaki en hızlı telefonlardan biri değildir. Aynı CPU / GPU kombinasyonu ile donatılmış Realme 6 Pro, 3DMark gibi grafik yoğun testlerde çok benzer sonuçlar elde ederken, Xiaomi test cihazımızı AnTuTu ve PCMark gibi sistem kıyaslamalarında küçük bir farkla geride bırakıyor. Bu arada, Huawei P40 Lite, ham performans açısından genel olarak açık kazanıyor.

Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
982 Points ∼60%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1063 Points ∼65% +8%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1337 Points ∼82% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (982 - 1063, n=3)
1017 Points ∼63% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=63)
1626 Points ∼100% +66%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1163 Points ∼47%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1201 Points ∼48% +3%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1338 Points ∼54% +15%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2493 Points ∼100% +114%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (1163 - 1201, n=3)
1179 Points ∼47% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=58)
1746 Points ∼70% +50%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1771 Points ∼90%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1759 Points ∼89% -1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1475 Points ∼75% -17%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1430 Points ∼73% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
1949 Points ∼99% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (1690 - 1771, n=3)
1740 Points ∼88% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (445 - 3531, n=79)
1971 Points ∼100% +11%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
569 Points ∼94%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
567 Points ∼94% 0%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
320 Points ∼53% -44%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
282 Points ∼47% -50%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
604 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (559 - 569, n=3)
565 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=79)
564 Points ∼93% -1%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7829 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5649 Points ∼56% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
9967 Points ∼99% +27%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
10106 Points ∼100% +29%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8185 Points ∼81% +5%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
9164 Points ∼91% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (7673 - 10106, n=3)
8536 Points ∼84% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=480)
5766 Points ∼57% -26%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9091 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6416 Points ∼43% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
14946 Points ∼100% +64%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
13777 Points ∼92% +52%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
12070 Points ∼81% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (9027 - 13777, n=3)
10632 Points ∼71% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=638)
6307 Points ∼42% -31%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2721 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2161 Points ∼73% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2543 Points ∼85% -7%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2562 Points ∼86% -6%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2304 Points ∼77% -15%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2977 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2562 - 2765, n=3)
2683 Points ∼90% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=140)
2631 Points ∼88% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2250 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1438 Points ∼50% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1978 Points ∼68% -12%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2255 Points ∼78% 0%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1103 Points ∼38% -51%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2552 Points ∼88% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2250 - 2257, n=3)
2254 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=140)
2894 Points ∼100% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2340 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1554 Points ∼59% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2087 Points ∼79% -11%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2317 Points ∼88% -1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1248 Points ∼47% -47%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2636 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2317 - 2353, n=3)
2337 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=140)
2605 Points ∼99% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3236 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2311 Points ∼58% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3326 Points ∼84% +3%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3067 Points ∼77% -5%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2621 Points ∼66% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3972 Points ∼100% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3067 - 3256, n=3)
3186 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5728, n=486)
2148 Points ∼54% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2539 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1530 Points ∼56% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2322 Points ∼84% -9%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2558 Points ∼93% +1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1102 Points ∼40% -57%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2752 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2539 - 2558, n=3)
2549 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=486)
2032 Points ∼74% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2667 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1654 Points ∼56% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2412 Points ∼82% -10%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2656 Points ∼90% 0%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1265 Points ∼43% -53%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2954 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2656 - 2680, n=3)
2668 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=487)
1886 Points ∼64% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3226 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2336 Points ∼58% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3362 Points ∼84% +4%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3125 Points ∼78% -3%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2606 Points ∼65% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
4003 Points ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3125 - 3267, n=3)
3206 Points ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5718, n=516)
2058 Points ∼51% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3785 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1993 Points ∼52% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2323 Points ∼61% -39%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3835 Points ∼100% +1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1747 Points ∼46% -54%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3488 Points ∼91% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3785 - 3835, n=3)
3808 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=516)
2703 Points ∼70% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3645 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2060 Points ∼56% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2412 Points ∼66% -34%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3651 Points ∼100% 0%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1885 Points ∼52% -48%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3591 Points ∼98% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3645 - 3669, n=3)
3655 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=516)
2272 Points ∼62% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3170 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2217 Points ∼60% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3280 Points ∼89% +3%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3083 Points ∼84% -3%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2550 Points ∼69% -20%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3676 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3083 - 3170, n=3)
3135 Points ∼85% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=566)
2035 Points ∼55% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2356 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1473 Points ∼54% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2218 Points ∼81% -6%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points ∼87% +1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1117 Points ∼41% -53%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2740 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2356 - 2388, n=3)
2371 Points ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=566)
1698 Points ∼62% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2499 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1592 Points ∼55% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2390 Points ∼82% -4%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2514 Points ∼87% +1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1276 Points ∼44% -49%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2904 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2499 - 2514, n=3)
2507 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7305, n=567)
1622 Points ∼56% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3263 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2225 Points ∼61% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3267 Points ∼90% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3076 Points ∼85% -6%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2568 Points ∼71% -21%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3638 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3070 - 3263, n=3)
3136 Points ∼86% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=608)
1901 Points ∼52% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3620 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2027 Points ∼55% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2219 Points ∼60% -39%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3683 Points ∼100% +2%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1767 Points ∼48% -51%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3384 Points ∼92% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3620 - 3683, n=3)
3650 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=607)
2224 Points ∼60% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3534 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2068 Points ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2390 Points ∼68% -32%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3528 Points ∼100% 0%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1899 Points ∼54% -46%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3437 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3501 - 3534, n=3)
3521 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=610)
1918 Points ∼54% -46%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20054 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20393 Points ∼74% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
22928 Points ∼83% +14%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
14849 Points ∼54% -26%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
24514 Points ∼89% +22%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
27654 Points ∼100% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (14849 - 20054, n=3)
18307 Points ∼66% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 57583, n=756)
15100 Points ∼55% -25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
51789 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25086 Points ∼47% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
39137 Points ∼73% -24%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
53600 Points ∼100% +3%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
23159 Points ∼43% -55%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
47563 Points ∼89% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (51789 - 53600, n=3)
52696 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=754)
25291 Points ∼47% -51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38315 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23866 Points ∼58% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
33832 Points ∼83% -12%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
33926 Points ∼83% -11%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
23447 Points ∼57% -39%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
41003 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (33926 - 38671, n=3)
36971 Points ∼90% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 110468, n=754)
19970 Points ∼49% -48%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
85 fps ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
46 fps ∼52% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
82 fps ∼92% -4%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps ∼96% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
89 fps ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (85 - 86, n=3)
85.3 fps ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=762)
43.1 fps ∼48% -49%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
58 fps ∼97% -3%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
59 fps ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (59 - 60, n=3)
59.7 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=771)
30.2 fps ∼50% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24 fps ∼45% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
49 fps ∼92% +20%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
41 fps ∼77% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
53 fps ∼100% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (41 - 42, n=3)
41.3 fps ∼78% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=667)
25.3 fps ∼48% -38%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼44% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
42 fps ∼81% +8%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
38 fps ∼73% -3%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
52 fps ∼100% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (37 - 39, n=3)
38 fps ∼73% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=675)
21.5 fps ∼41% -45%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
15 fps ∼45% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
29 fps ∼88% -3%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼91% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (30 - 31, n=3)
30.3 fps ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=530)
20.4 fps ∼62% -32%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼41% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
26 fps ∼76% -10%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
27 fps ∼79% -7%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
34 fps ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (27 - 29, n=3)
27.7 fps ∼81% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=532)
18.7 fps ∼55% -36%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.5 fps ∼42% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6.8 fps ∼52% -38%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼85% 0%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
4.5 fps ∼35% -59%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
13 fps ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (11 - 11, n=3)
11 fps ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=278)
11.1 fps ∼85% +1%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.9 fps ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼32% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
11 fps ∼100% +59%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7 fps ∼64% +1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2.9 fps ∼26% -58%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
7.9 fps ∼72% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (6.9 - 7, n=3)
6.97 fps ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=276)
7.98 fps ∼73% +16%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.1 fps ∼43% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
17 fps ∼81% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼81% 0%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
7.5 fps ∼36% -56%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (17 - 17, n=3)
17 fps ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=282)
16.4 fps ∼78% -4%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼48% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps ∼90% +6%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps ∼90% +6%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8.8 fps ∼42% -51%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (18 - 19, n=2)
18.5 fps ∼88% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=281)
19 fps ∼90% +6%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼53% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
16 fps ∼84% -11%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼95% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
19 fps ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (18 - 18, n=3)
18 fps ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=455)
13.8 fps ∼73% -23%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.6 fps ∼43% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
14 fps ∼70% -18%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼80% -6%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
20 fps ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (16 - 17, n=3)
16.3 fps ∼82% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=459)
12.3 fps ∼62% -28%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
271934 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
181295 Points ∼57% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
282085 Points ∼88% +4%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
275464 Points ∼86% +1%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
319383 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (271934 - 275931, n=3)
274443 Points ∼86% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=84)
311945 Points ∼98% +15%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1226 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1145 Points ∼89% -7%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1233 Points ∼96% +1%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
1267 Points ∼98% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (1226 - 1410, n=3)
1290 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=699)
800 Points ∼62% -35%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3757 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2168 Points ∼50% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3419 Points ∼79% -9%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3768 Points ∼87% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
4339 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3757 - 3807, n=3)
3777 Points ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=699)
2379 Points ∼55% -37%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4452 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1605 Points ∼34% -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3609 Points ∼76% -19%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4573 Points ∼97% +3%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
4726 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (4295 - 4573, n=3)
4440 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8398, n=699)
1763 Points ∼37% -60%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6856 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4738 Points ∼66% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6155 Points ∼86% -10%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
6908 Points ∼96% +1%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
7178 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (6828 - 6908, n=3)
6864 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=699)
3325 Points ∼46% -52%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3444 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
634 Points ∼17% -82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3054 Points ∼83% -11%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3481 Points ∼94% +1%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3695 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3444 - 3542, n=3)
3489 Points ∼94% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6205, n=699)
1684 Points ∼46% -51%

Redmi Note 9 Pro, web'e göz atarken iyi performans gösterir. Öznel olarak, her şey pürüzsüz - web sayfaları hızlı bir şekilde yüklenir, bağlantılar hızlı bir şekilde gezilebilir ve daha karmaşık HTML-5 sayfaları akıllı telefon için bir sorun oluşturmaz. Böylece, Redmi Note 9 Pro, karşılaştırmamızda ikinci sırada yer alabiliyor ve bu da onu tarayıcı kıyaslamalarımızda doğrudan Huawei P40 Lite'ın altına koyuyor.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
55.352 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (47.9 - 48.5, n=2)
48.2 Points ∼87% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
47.901 Points ∼87%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=162)
39.6 Points ∼72% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
35.298 Points ∼64% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
27.681 Points ∼50% -42%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
91.154 Points ∼100% +5%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
89.577 Points ∼98% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (86.8 - 89.6, n=3)
88.6 Points ∼97% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
86.75 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
72.098 Points ∼79% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
51.257 Points ∼56% -41%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=592)
45.7 Points ∼50% -47%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
53.2 runs/min ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
45.2 runs/min ∼85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (44.1 - 45.2, n=2)
44.7 runs/min ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=146)
42.5 runs/min ∼80% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
41.6 runs/min ∼78% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
29.1 runs/min ∼55% -36%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
97 Points ∼100% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
71 Points ∼73%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=226)
69.4 Points ∼72% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (67 - 71, n=3)
69 Points ∼71% -3%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
67 Points ∼69% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
57 Points ∼59% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
55 Points ∼57% -23%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
17925 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
17265 Points ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (17157 - 17303, n=3)
17242 Points ∼96% 0%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
17157 Points ∼96% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
15606 Points ∼87% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
10194 Points ∼57% -41%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=757)
7576 Points ∼42% -56%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2000 - 59466, n=783)
9978 ms * ∼100% -250%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
4375.1 ms * ∼44% -54%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
3033.1 ms * ∼30% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
3001.5 ms * ∼30% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2794 - 3033, n=3)
2892 ms * ∼29% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
2850.1 ms * ∼29%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
2471.6 ms * ∼25% +13%

* ... smaller is better

Redmi Note 9 Pro'nun UFS depolaması, hızlı uygulama yükleme süreleri için yüksek sıralı okuma hızlarına odaklanarak iyi veri aktarım hızlarını garanti eder. Bu arada, Huawei P40 Lite test cihazımızdan bir kez daha önemli bir performans sergiliyor. Xiaomi'ye göre, Redmi Note 9 Pro UFS 2.1 belleği kullanıyor olsa da, ölçümlerimiz sadece UFS 2.0 depolama biriminin takıldığını göstermektedir. Redmi Note 9 Pro, microSD kart performansı açısından iyi sonuçlar elde ederken, yazma hızları daha iyi olabilirdi . Bununla birlikte, rakipleri zaten iyileştirilmesi için çok fazla alan olmadığını gösteriyor.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 ProSamsung Galaxy A51Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Prorealme 6 ProOppo A91Huawei P40 LiteAverage 64 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-1%
17%
19%
-6%
35%
-8%
-35%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
54.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
57.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
63.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15%
60.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
10%
70.6 (Nano Memory Card)
29%
55.3 (33.3 - 65.3, n=9)
1%
50.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=504)
-8%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
71.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
77.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
1%
82.63 (Nano Memory Card)
8%
73.2 (36.8 - 85.4, n=9)
-5%
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=504)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
112.93
104.4
-8%
180.4
60%
154
36%
28.55
-75%
175.45
55%
71.8 (13.6 - 196, n=13)
-36%
31.7 (0.14 - 272, n=845)
-72%
Random Read 4KB
122.58
110.8
-10%
156.22
27%
158.66
29%
145.64
19%
157.32
28%
113 (60.6 - 157, n=13)
-8%
55.8 (1.59 - 265, n=845)
-54%
Sequential Write 256KB
171.09
184.9
8%
193.54
13%
203.28
19%
185.26
8%
181.69
6%
180 (135 - 222, n=13)
5%
118 (2.99 - 756, n=845)
-31%
Sequential Read 256KB
498.15
496.1
0%
534.5
7%
512.61
3%
505.44
1%
912.99
83%
489 (272 - 687, n=13)
-2%
322 (12.1 - 1781, n=845)
-35%

Oyun - Pürüzsüz ama 30 FPS ile sınırlı

Önceden yüklenmiş uygulamalar, oyun deneyimini iyileştirmesi beklenen Xiaomi'nin oyun turbo'yu içerir. Kullanıcıların oyun oynarken düğme ve tam ekran hareketleri için sınırlar belirlemelerine ve dokunmatik ekranın hassasiyetini artırmasına olanak tanır.Oyun turbo'nun küçük optimizasyonları olmadan bile sorunsuz bir şekilde çalıştığından, uygulama gereksiz görünüyor. Gamebench testlerimizin gösterdiği gibi, akıllı telefon maksimum ayrıntı ayarlarında bile terlemiyor. Kare hızı 30 FPS'yi geçemese de, nadiren bu değerin altına düşer.

Asphalt 9: Legends
Asphalt 9: Legends
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
010203040Tooltip
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.2.2a: Ø29.8 (21-31)
; PUBG Mobile; 0.18.0: Ø29.7 (19-31)

Emissions - No Throttling Under Load

Temperature

GFXBench battery test T-Rex
GFXBench battery test T-Rex
GFXBench battery test Manhattan
GFXBench battery test Manhattan

With up to just 38.4 °C, the thermals of the Redmi Note 9 Pro remain in a pleasantly low range for comfortable handling at all times. Internally, the smartphone dissipates heat so efficiently that the SoC's clock speeds do not need to be throttled. In the GFXBench battery tests, the frame rates remain consistently high in both the T-Rex and the more-demanding Manhattan benchmark even after rendering the same scene 30 times consecutively.

Maksimum yük
 38.1 °C38.4 °C38.2 °C 
 38.2 °C37.5 °C37.7 °C 
 36.4 °C36.6 °C38.2 °C 
Maksimum: 38.4 °C
Ortalama: 37.7 °C
34.5 °C34.7 °C38.5 °C
33.9 °C35 °C37.5 °C
34.4 °C35.2 °C36.3 °C
Maksimum: 38.5 °C
Ortalama: 35.6 °C
Güç kaynağı  29.5 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

Speakers

Although the speaker on the bottom of the smartphone produces very linear mid and high tones, it appears to only know bass from hearsay. With 87.1 dB(A), it is able to reach a relatively high and distortion-free maximum volume level. It is generally well suited to occasional video and music playback. Furthermore, voices can be clearly understood, making it a good choice for hands-free mode.

External audio devices can be connected to the Redmi Note 9 Pro via the 3.5-mm headphone jack or via Bluetooth 5.0.

Speaker: Pink noise
Speaker: Pink noise
Headphone jack: Pink noise
Headphone jack: Pink noise
Audio jack measurements
Audio jack measurements (SNR: 82.91 dBFS)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.832.92519.625.53123.920.44024.323.15030.533.56318.724.48020.420.410018.620.912517.526.716019.544.520019.244.325016.450.231515.255.640014.259.750014.765.863013.872.180014.675.2100014.175.8125013.574.4160014.474.9200013.976.1250013.878.7315013.879.4400014.771.2500014.271.1630014.470.8800014.974100001575.61250015.166.41600015.356.1SPL26.587.1N0.869.6median 14.7median 71.1Delta0.811.934.933.929.124.125.424.329.426.239.43427.324.821.622.1242320.722.519.938.51840.916.847.516.253.315.957.613.559.213.962.312.964.91465.414.766.614.168.214.268.714.569.815.470.614.97014.867.51562.815.360.815.360.515.64415.535.12779.30.942.8median 15.3median 60.81.311.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 9 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energy Management - Enormously Long Battery Life Thanks to a Huge Battery

Energy Consumption

On average, the Redmi Note 9 Pro only consumes 3.88 watts under load, making it relatively energy efficient. However, the smartphone still falls short of its predecessor Redmi Note 8 Pro and the Realme 6 Pro in this category.

With the included 33-watt charger, the Redmi Note 9 Pro can quickly recharge its 5020-mAh battery. Fully recharging the device took exactly two hours in our test.

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.01 / 0.25 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 0.75 / 2.19 / 2.24 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 3.88 / 5.97 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
4500 mAh
realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh
Oppo A91
4025 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite
4200 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-5%
-14%
-11%
15%
3%
-15%
1%
Idle Minimum *
0.75
0.9
-20%
0.79
-5%
0.92
-23%
0.82
-9%
0.79
-5%
1.057 (0.75 - 1.5, n=3)
-41%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=859)
-18%
Idle Average *
2.19
1.7
22%
2.32
-6%
1.79
18%
1.73
21%
2.14
2%
2.03 (1.79 - 2.19, n=3)
7%
1.751 (0.6 - 6.2, n=858)
20%
Idle Maximum *
2.24
1.8
20%
2.38
-6%
1.88
16%
1.75
22%
2.23
-0%
2.21 (1.88 - 2.5, n=3)
1%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=859)
9%
Load Average *
3.88
5.2
-34%
4.72
-22%
5.41
-39%
2.33
40%
3.6
7%
4.83 (3.88 - 5.41, n=3)
-24%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=853)
-5%
Load Maximum *
5.97
6.6
-11%
7.68
-29%
7.59
-27%
5.97
-0%
5.17
13%
7.02 (5.97 - 7.59, n=3)
-18%
6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=853)
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

With a capacity of 5020-mAh, the battery of the Redmi Note 9 Pro is decidedly large and is in fact the largest battery of any smartphone in our comparison. The only direct competitor in this aspect is its sibling Redmi Note 9S, which contains the same battery.

The Redmi Note 9 Pro shows a seemingly unending amount of stamina and should easily last users one day or even multiple days. With almost 20 hours, the smartphone reaches an excellent runtime in our Wi-Fi test. When playing an H.264 video, it shows a similarly high amount of stamina.

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
38h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
19h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 16min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
5h 03min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
4500 mAh
realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh
Oppo A91
4025 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite
4200 mAh
Battery Runtime
-24%
-21%
-12%
-49%
-10%
Reader / Idle
2336
1689
-28%
1893
-19%
2154
-8%
H.264
1096
846
-23%
984
-10%
1176
7%
WiFi v1.3
1175
698
-41%
864
-26%
1031
-12%
605
-49%
1007
-14%
Load
303
289
-5%
212
-30%
228
-25%

Artılar

+ iyi değer
+ NFC
+ microSD ve 2x çift SIM
+ hızlı Wi-Fi
+ düşük SAR değerleri
+ 33 watt şarj cihazı
+ hızlı sistem performansı
+ Kısma yok
+ çok uzun pil ömrü

Eksiler

- önceden yüklenmiş bloatware
- dar dinamik aralığa sahip resimler
- oyun 30 FPS ile sınırlı

Verdict - Once Again with Plenty of Features for a Cheap Price

In review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Germany
In review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Germany

With the Redmi Note 9 Pro, Xiaomi has added another smartphone that shines with a great price-performance ratio to its portfolio.

For 250 Euros (~$282), it offers a lot: A bright, 6.67-inch IPS display, 6 GB of RAM, 64 or 128 GB of internal storage, the fast octa-core Snapdragon 720G SoC and a quad-camera system with a resolution of 64 MP. Thanks to the 5020-mAh battery, the Redmi Note 9 Pro reaches excellent runtimes, the 33-watt power adapter charges the smartphone quickly and there are handy extras such as a large card tray that simultaneously accepts one microSD and two SIM cards.

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro offers a lot of value for its price, while its long battery life and extra features such as NFC make it stand out from the crowd.

Its disadvantages, on the other hand, are few and far between. That being said, the 64-MP camera is not quite as impressive as its specifications might suggest, since it is ultimately lacking in terms of dynamic range. In contrast, games being limited to 30 FPS is not a huge issue, particularly since they rarely fall below this FPS mark. Although the smartphone contains preinstalled advertisement bloatware, the respective apps can be deleted.

The release of this smartphone may fill buyers of the Redmi Note 9S with regret. While the Redmi Note 9 Pro is physically almost identical, it offers several higher-end features including an NFC module for a rather small premium. Upgrading from a Redmi Note 8 Pro is not particularly worthwhile however, since there were only minor gen-to-gen improvements.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro - 06/23/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

İşcilik
86%
Klavye
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
96%
Bağlanılabilirlik
50 / 70 → 72%
Ağırlık
88%
Batarya
92%
Görüntü
89%
Oyun performansı
29 / 64 → 46%
Uygulama performansı
70 / 86 → 81%
Isınma
91%
Ses
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
65%
Ortalama
77%
83%
Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro İncelemesi: Ucuz fiyatına karşın özelliklerle dolu
Manuel Masiero, 2020-06-29 (Update: 2020-06-29)
Aslinur Sarica
Translator: Aslinur Sarica - Translator