Notebookcheck Logo

Kısa inceleme: Asus ROG GU501GM (i7-8750H, GTX 1060) Laptop

Çalışırken ıslık çalmak. İlgi çekici ince paketin içinde Asus ROG GU501GM stil ve performansın karışımı olan yeterli bir oyun cihazı. Ancak malesef işlemci tutarlılığı ve fan sesi bu mükemmelliğe gölge düşürüyor.
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
İşlemci
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafik kartı
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Çekirdek: 1405 MHz, Bellek: 2002 MHz, GDDR5, NVIDIA GeForce Game Ready Driver 397.64, NVIDIA Optimus
Bellek
16 GB 
, DDR4-2666 / PC4-21300 (1333.3 MHz), 1x16 GB
Görüntü
15.60 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics AUO45ED, IPS, parlak: hayır
Anakart
Intel HM370
Harddisk
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, 128 GB 
, 128 GB PCIe NVMe SSD + 1 TB 5400 RPM SSHD (8 GB SSD cache), 1049 GB Boş
Ses kartı
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Bağlantılar
4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: combo audio out/in, Brightness Sensor
Network
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 17.8 x 384 x 262
Batarya
55 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4-cell
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: 2x 2 W, Klavye: Chiclet, RGB (ROG Aura Core), Klavye ışığı: evet, Asus ROG Gaming Center, ROG Aura Core, Asus Sonic Studio, 12 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
2.499 kg
Fiyat
1900 USD
Bağlantılar
Asus anasayfa
Asus notebook kısmı
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

❌
390 mm 272 mm 23 mm 2.7 kg393 mm 266 mm 18.9 mm 2.4 kg384 mm 261 mm 20 mm 2.5 kg384 mm 262 mm 17.8 mm 2.5 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg356 mm 250 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Left: DC in, HDMI, 3x USB 3.1 Gen 2, combo audio jack
Left: DC in, HDMI, 3x USB 3.1 Gen 2, combo audio jack
Right: USB 3.1 Gen 2, Thunderbolt 3, Kensington Lock
Right: USB 3.1 Gen 2, Thunderbolt 3, Kensington Lock
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=5, last 2 years)
1135 MBit/s +91%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s +12%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
593 MBit/s
Aorus X5 v8
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
587 MBit/s -1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
585 MBit/s -1%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
551 MBit/s -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
379 MBit/s -36%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=5, last 2 years)
1369 MBit/s +106%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s +3%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
682 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
682 MBit/s +2%
Aorus X5 v8
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
673 MBit/s +1%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
666 MBit/s
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
660 MBit/s -1%
271.4
cd/m²		278.3
cd/m²		277.2
cd/m²
288.3
cd/m²		286.7
cd/m²		278.3
cd/m²
296.2
cd/m²		278.7
cd/m²		278.2
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
AU Optronics AUO45ED tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 296.2 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 281.5 cd/m² Minimum: 15.54 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 92 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 286.7 cd/m²
Kontrast: 735:1 (Siyah: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.274
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
AU Optronics AUO45ED, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
LGD05C0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080		Aorus X5 v8
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080		Acer Predator Triton 700
AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Display
5%
5%
4%
6%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
63.4
66.2
4%
66.1
4%
63.6
0%
67.1
6%
62.5
-1%
sRGB Coverage
87.7
92.1
5%
92.7
6%
93.8
7%
93.4
6%
88.7
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67.2
67.2
64.9
68.1
63.5
Response Times
49%
71%
52%
48%
-26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
30.8 ?(13.6, 17.2)
17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4)
43%
6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2)
79%
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
45%
18.8 ?(10, 8.8)
39%
44.8 ?(21.2, 23.6)
-45%
Response Time Black / White *
27.6 ?(16, 11.6)
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
54%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
62%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
59%
12 ?(7.6, 4.4)
57%
29.6 ?(15.6, 14)
-7%
PWM Frequency
Screen
21%
-13%
27%
23%
-13%
Brightness middle
286.7
254
-11%
307
7%
313
9%
271
-5%
291
1%
Brightness
281
262
-7%
296
5%
300
7%
259
-8%
277
-1%
Brightness Distribution
92
89
-3%
89
-3%
78
-15%
87
-5%
84
-9%
Black Level *
0.39
0.22
44%
0.25
36%
0.33
15%
0.27
31%
0.22
44%
Contrast
735
1155
57%
1228
67%
948
29%
1004
37%
1323
80%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.17
2.37
43%
5.74
-38%
1.29
69%
1.81
57%
5.52
-32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.22
4.71
35%
11.32
-57%
2.04
72%
3.33
54%
10.72
-48%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
1.58
37%
6.44
-158%
0.69
72%
1.09
56%
6.59
-164%
Gamma
2.274 97%
2.48 89%
2.48 89%
2.43 91%
2.45 90%
2.44 90%
CCT
6885 94%
6785 96%
8395 77%
6550 99%
6435 101%
7816 83%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
60
5%
60
5%
60
5%
61
7%
58
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
87
92
6%
93
7%
94
8%
93
7%
89
2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.84
1.94
Total Average (Program / Settings)
25% / 22%
21% / 2%
28% / 27%
26% / 24%
-13% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.6 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17942 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z: CPU
CPU-Z: CPU
CPU-Z: Caches
CPU-Z: Caches
CPU-Z: Mainboard
CPU-Z: Mainboard
CPU-Z: Memory
CPU-Z: Memory
CPU-Z: SPD
CPU-Z: SPD
GPU-Z: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU-Z: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU-Z: GeForce GTX 1060
GPU-Z: GeForce GTX 1060
HWiNFO64
HWiNFO64
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points +60%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
205 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15
Intel Core i7-8700
197 Points +17%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
185 Points +10%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
182 Points +8%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
176 Points +5%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
174 Points +4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=86)
172 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
Intel Core i7-8550U
169 Points +1%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points -7%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points -14%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
140 Points -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3074 Points +162%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points +20%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1378 Points +17%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
1265 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15
Intel Core i7-8700
1215 Points +3%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1174 Points
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
1129 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=93)
1113 Points -5%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
932 Points -21%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
807 Points -31%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
746 Points -36%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points -37%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
626 (578min - 626max) Points -47%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
Intel Core i7-8550U
566 (526min - 566max) Points -52%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (2.62 - 3.73, n=23, last 2 years)
3.21 Points +67%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.33 Points +21%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.09 Points +9%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
2.08 Points +8%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
2.02 Points +5%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
1.97 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1.89 - 2, n=40)
1.967 Points +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.96 Points +2%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points -5%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.63 Points -15%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
1.55 Points -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 64.3, n=24, last 2 years)
35.6 Points +184%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15.76 Points +26%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.05 Points +20%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
13.85 Points +10%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.55 Points
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
12.5 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (9.54 - 13.5, n=41)
12.2 Points -3%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
10.33 Points -18%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
8.79 Points -30%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.13 Points -35%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
7.65 Points -39%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
6.82 Points -46%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (32456 - 112749, n=24, last 2 years)
58921 Points +71%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15
Intel Core i7-8700
38543 Points +12%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
36819 Points +7%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
34488 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (29664 - 35307, n=25)
33163 Points -4%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
29330 Points -15%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
25561 Points -26%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
23794 Points -31%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (5719 - 15819, n=24, last 2 years)
9030 Points +40%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15
Intel Core i7-8700
7257 Points +13%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
6841 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (6236 - 6645, n=25)
6479 Points +1%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
6438 Points
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
6436 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
4330 Points -33%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
4286 Points -33%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
353.2 s * -181%
Average of class Gaming
  (116.8 - 1021, n=13, last 2 years)
333 s * -165%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
268.3 s * -114%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15
Intel Core i7-8700
253.1 s * -102%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
197.6 s * -57%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (125.5 - 180.5, n=6)
157.5 s * -25%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
125.5 s *
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6959
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
34488
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6438
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
69.4 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.55 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.92 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
103.7 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1174 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
168 Points
Yardım
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5773 Points +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (4166 - 6653, n=33, last 2 years)
5202 Points +26%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5160 Points +25%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4665 Points +13%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4627 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (4119 - 5371, n=15)
4511 Points +10%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4504 Points +9%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
4119 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4622 - 7085, n=32, last 2 years)
6048 Points +18%
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5953 Points +16%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5676 Points +11%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5662 Points +11%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5621 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (5111 - 5731, n=15)
5504 Points +8%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5211 Points +2%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5111 Points
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (5206 - 10574, n=13, last 2 years)
7497 Points +37%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (5294 - 7765, n=4)
5962 Points +9%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5454 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4119 puan
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5454 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5111 puan
PCMark 10 Score
5092 puan
Yardım
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7		Aorus X5 v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7		Acer Predator Triton 700
2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)		Average Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
 
AS SSD
253%
213%
129%
121%
207%
3%
Copy Game MB/s
419.3
369 ?(166.4 - 599, n=7)
-12%
Copy Program MB/s
269.2
209 ?(88.4 - 488, n=7)
-22%
Copy ISO MB/s
773
549 ?(310 - 823, n=7)
-29%
Score Total
900
4122
358%
3649
305%
2536
182%
2515
179%
3282
265%
1014 ?(634 - 1386, n=7)
13%
Score Write
345
2051
494%
1446
319%
939
172%
954
177%
1243
260%
365 ?(196 - 524, n=7)
6%
Score Read
377
1346
257%
1471
290%
1092
190%
1061
181%
1350
258%
443 ?(303 - 586, n=7)
18%
Access Time Write *
0.058
0.035
40%
0.041
29%
0.046
21%
0.044
24%
0.041
29%
0.06829 ?(0.048 - 0.09, n=7)
-18%
Access Time Read *
0.278
0.073
74%
0.046
83%
0.119
57%
0.166
40%
0.062
78%
0.2317 ?(0.152 - 0.278, n=7)
17%
4K-64 Write
237
1760
643%
1198
405%
742
213%
773
226%
913
285%
259 ?(116 - 391, n=7)
9%
4K-64 Read
270.3
1170
333%
1218
351%
847
213%
856
217%
1057
291%
317 ?(193.1 - 426, n=7)
17%
4K Write
67.1
107.2
60%
90.2
34%
80.4
20%
84.5
26%
93
39%
65.5 ?(46.5 - 90, n=7)
-2%
4K Read
22.62
48.94
116%
43.42
92%
23.36
3%
23.21
3%
41.47
83%
28.2 ?(18.9 - 45.2, n=7)
25%
Seq Write
404.7
1834
353%
1580
290%
1163
187%
966
139%
2372
486%
404 ?(213 - 460, n=7)
0%
Seq Read
841
1266
51%
2091
149%
2213
163%
1813
116%
2517
199%
973 ?(702 - 1201, n=7)
16%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1498 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 471.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 342.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 264.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 707 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 469.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 32.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 75.6 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)
135868 Points +90%
Aorus X5 v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H
118612 Points +66%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
115579 Points +62%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
98013 Points +37%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
71431 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (26770 - 86193, n=68)
71237 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600
70020 Points -2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
51038 Points -29%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G
44796 Points -37%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H
38881 Points -46%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7300HQ
36528 Points -49%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=233, last 2 years)
29268 Points +149%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
18120 Points +54%
Aorus X5 v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H
17257 Points +47%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
14780 Points +26%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
11733 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (10708 - 12298, n=77)
11547 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600
11512 Points -2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
7610 Points -35%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G
7355 Points -37%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H
6356 Points -46%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7300HQ
5738 Points -51%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (46258 - 613731, n=18, last 2 years)
340057 Points
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H
200390 Points
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G
165559 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (33205 - 257260, n=33)
152262 Points
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=229, last 2 years)
40173 Points +168%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
23694 Points +58%
Aorus X5 v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H
21823 Points +46%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
18687 Points +25%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600
15182 Points +1%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
14975 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (12620 - 15607, n=77)
14692 Points -2%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G
9862 Points -34%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
9147 Points -39%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7300HQ
8345 Points -44%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H
7133 Points -52%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Average of class Gaming
  (1251 - 26759, n=228, last 2 years)
19860 Points +113%
Aorus X5 v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H
12471 Points +34%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
10663 Points +14%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
9333 Points
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
9075 Points -3%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
8786 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (5655 - 12930, n=76)
8458 Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600
7838 Points -16%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G
7788 Points -17%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H
7025 Points -25%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7300HQ
5933 Points -36%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
33570 puan
3DMark 11 Performance
13082 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
30938 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10370 puan
Yardım
Rise of the Tomb Raider | The Witcher 3
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value)
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
57 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (51 - 68.8, n=37)
61.3 fps +8%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (sort by value)
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
39 fps
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
52.7 fps +35%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
59.4 fps +52%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
52.4 fps +34%
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
60 fps +54%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
62.9 fps +61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (24 - 42.3, n=60)
38.6 fps -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=224, last 2 years)
116.1 fps +198%
düşük orta yüksek ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 194 173 162 99
The Witcher 3 (2015) 166 120 66 39
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 163 120 71 57
Hitman 2016 (2016) 71 70 59 46
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta
31.4 / 31.4 / 34.2 dB
Çalışırken
42.8 / 50.9 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
sessiz
40 dB(A)
duyulabilirlik
50 dB(A)
gürültülü
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision (15 cm uzaklık)   environment noise: 28.6 dB(A)
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7		Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7		Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
Noise
5%
-1%
-3%
-7%
-2%
off / environment *
28.6
30
-5%
29
-1%
29
-1%
30
-5%
31
-8%
Idle Minimum *
31.4
30
4%
30
4%
30
4%
33
-5%
33
-5%
Idle Average *
31.4
31
1%
31
1%
31
1%
35
-11%
34
-8%
Idle Maximum *
34.2
34
1%
33
4%
35
-2%
40
-17%
40
-17%
Load Average *
42.8
43
-0%
49
-14%
49
-14%
45
-5%
41
4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50.9
42
17%
50
2%
51
-0%
50
2%
43
16%
Load Maximum *
50.9
44
14%
52
-2%
54
-6%
55
-8%
48
6%

* ... smaller is better

Maksimum yük
 36.6 °C43 °C39.8 °C 
 29.6 °C40.6 °C34 °C 
 26 °C24.6 °C28 °C 
Maksimum: 43 °C
Ortalama: 33.6 °C
46.6 °C45.2 °C41 °C
35.4 °C37.2 °C32.4 °C
27 °C28 °C28 °C
Maksimum: 46.6 °C
Ortalama: 35.6 °C
Güç kaynağı  43.6 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7		Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7		Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
Heat
-1%
-6%
-10%
-7%
-21%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
49
-14%
52
-21%
53
-23%
50
-16%
61
-42%
Maximum Bottom *
46.6
63
-35%
49
-5%
65
-39%
62
-33%
69
-48%
Idle Upper Side *
29.2
24
18%
31
-6%
26
11%
27
8%
29
1%
Idle Bottom *
34
25
26%
31
9%
30
12%
29
15%
32
6%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.637.5253535.63135.733.94034.434.15032.236.96334.237.18031.844.910030.251.712529.257.416029.665.720028.564.325027.464.831527.563.440026.359.350026.358.963025.162.680025.666.2100025.56612502564.416002564.5200024.267250024.470.9315024.571.6400023.974.3500023.769.4630023.765.8800023.466.61000023.464.31250023.558.71600023.450.3SPL36.880.8N2.850.1median 25median 64.5Delta1.3340.943.13638.231.531.732.539.126.729.826.13026.228.826.933.226.233.822.94224.250.122.451.520.353.720.153.119.755.619.160.719631964.717.768.617.367.417.465.617.464.117.45717.558.717.663.517.46317.560.517.557.517.461.417.361.330.375.81.435.6median 17.7median 60.51.66hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.08 / 0.8 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 12.35 / 19.98 / 25.44 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 94.28 / 140.63 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Asus FX503VM-EH73
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Aorus X5 v8
i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Acer Predator Triton 700
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption
15%
13%
-20%
-3%
-52%
-55%
Idle Minimum *
12.35
12.8
-4%
7
43%
16
-30%
14
-13%
25
-102%
28
-127%
Idle Average *
19.98
15.4
23%
11
45%
19
5%
18
10%
31
-55%
33
-65%
Idle Maximum *
25.44
15.9
37%
20
21%
26
-2%
22
14%
33
-30%
41
-61%
Load Average *
94.28
78
17%
98
-4%
103
-9%
91
3%
102
-8%
94
-0%
Witcher 3 ultra *
132.9
107.3
19%
132
1%
164
-23%
142
-7%
194
-46%
160
-20%
Load Maximum *
140.63
143.4
-2%
182
-29%
223
-59%
173
-23%
239
-70%
222
-58%

* ... smaller is better

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
4h 31min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 00min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
0h 45min
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 55 Wh		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 55 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		Aorus X5 v8
i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 92.24 Wh		Acer Predator Triton 700
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 54 Wh
Battery Runtime
73%
4%
181%
51%
-10%
Reader / Idle
271
507
87%
237
-13%
762
181%
294
8%
150
-45%
WiFi v1.3
240
362
51%
164
-32%
513
114%
144
-40%
Load
45
81
80%
70
56%
156
247%
87
93%
70
56%

Artılar

+ Hoş kasa
+ Sağlam kasa
+ Parmak izi ve yağlanmaya karşı dayanıklı
+ Thunderbolt 3 de olan geniş bağlantı noklararı
+ RGB tuşlar rahat ve sessiz
+ Hoparlörler oldukça iyi
+ Güçlü işlemci performansı
+ Güçlü grafik kartı performansı
+ Çoklu fan modları
+ El değen yerlerde iyi sıcaklık yönetimi

Eksiler

- Sentetik testlerde işlemci tutarsızlaşıyor
- Küçük trackpad
- Fan sesi yoğun kullanımda sinir bozucu şekilde tiz
- Batarya ömrü ortalama
- Bağlantı noktalarının yerleşimi ideal değil
In review: Asus GU501GM. Review unit courtesy of Asus.
In review: Asus GU501GM. Review unit courtesy of Asus.

GU501GM, Zephyrus M serisinin en iyi özelliklerini düşük bir fiyata sunmaya çalışıyor. Çoğunlukla da başarıyor. 

Ama malesef işlemci durumu biraz karıştırıyor. Artan performans çoğu iş için harika ama işlemci yoğun kullanımda tutarlılığını yitiriyor. Fan sesi ise bir diğer mesele. O kadar tizleşebiliyor ki, kulaklığı çıkarmamak daha iyi bir tercih olabiliyor. İşlemci bu durumdayken sistem çökebiliyor, ama bunun dışındaki durumlarda sorun çıkarmıyor. Farklı fan modları ile fan sesini önlemek mümkün.

Tüm bunlarla beraber GU501GM hakkında sevilmeyecek başka bir şey kalmıyor. Fiyatı düşünüldüğünde ise 1900$ etiketi bizce çok fazla. Bu fiyata daha güçlü donanımlı modeller bulmak mümkün.

Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 - 07/07/2018 v6(old)
Sam Medley

İşcilik
90 / 98 → 92%
Klavye
86%
Mouse
75%
Bağlanılabilirlik
59 / 81 → 73%
Ağırlık
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Batarya
75%
Görüntü
88%
Oyun performansı
93%
Uygulama performansı
95%
Isınma
88 / 95 → 92%
Ses
76 / 90 → 84%
Audio
65%
Camera
30 / 85 → 35%
Ortalama
75%
85%
Gaming - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Kısa inceleme: Asus ROG GU501GM (i7-8750H, GTX 1060) Laptop
Sam Medley, 2018-07- 1 (Update: 2018-07- 1)