Notebookcheck

Samsung Galaxy Book S Laptop İnceleme: İlk sorunları ile Lakefield

Brighter display. Samsung şimdi Intel işlemcili kompakt Galaxy Book S ürününü de sunuyor. ARM modeline kıyasla, uygulamalarla daha iyi uyumluluk elde edersiniz, ancak karşılığında LTE modem yoktur ve pil çalışma süreleri de daha kısadır. İki model arasında başka fark olup olmadığını kontrol ettik.
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff, Stefanie Voigt,

Samsung Galaxy Book S'yi yakın zamanda ARM işlemcisi ile inceledik ve Güney Koreli üretici şimdi kompakt ultrabook'unu Intel işlemciyle sunuyor. Bir kez daha tamamen pasif olarak soğutulan yepyeni Lakefield hibrit çip. Bununla birlikte, Intel modeli artık tüm bölgelerde bir LTE modemi içermiyor ve pil çalışma süreleri de daha kısa. X86 karşılığında uyumluluğu artırır. İki sürüm neredeyse benzer şekilde fiyatlandırılmıştır, bu nedenle hangi cihazın daha iyi olduğunu bulmak istiyoruz. Samsung'un resmi çevrimiçi mağazasından ünitemizi satın aldık, bu yüzden üreticiden seçilen bir basın örneği değil, düzenli bir perakende birim. 1129 Euro (~ 1275 $) fiyatla, Intel Lakefield işlemci, 8 GB RAM ve 256 GB depolama alanına sahip olursunuz. 1080p dokunmatik ekran da temelde aynıdır, ancak Samsung, Intel SKU'yu, parlaklığı 600 cd / m²'ye çıkarması beklenen özel bir Dış Mekan modu ile donatıyor. Kasa, portlar, hoparlörler ve giriş cihazları ( (arka plan aydınlatmasının rengi hariç) son incelenen ARM versiyonuyla aynıdır. Aşağıdaki incelemede iki modelin farklılıklarına odaklanacağız ve yeni Intel işlemciye daha yakından bakacağız.Not: Alman inceleme birimi bir LTE modemle donatılmadı, ancak diğer ülkelerde de yer alıyor. Bu nedenle, eksik LTE modemi ile ilgili inceleme bölümleri tüm bölgeleri temsil etmemektedir.

Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel (Galaxy Book Seri)
İşlemci
Intel Core i5-L16G7 5 x 1.4 - 3 GHz, Lakefield
Grafik kartı
Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Bellek
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x, soldered
Görüntü
13.3 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, capacitive, BOE07E7, IPS, parlak: evet, 60 Hz
Harddisk
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 187 GB Boş
Bağlantılar
2 USB 3.0, 2 DisplayPort, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm stereo jack, Kart okuyucular: microSD, 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, Alıcılar: Brightness (only for keyboard illumination)
Network
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 11.8 x 305.2 x 203.2
Batarya
42 Wh Lithium-Polymer
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: Stereo (AKG), 4x 1.2W, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, 25W power adapter, Samsung Tools, 12 Ay Garanti, fanless
Ağırlık
940 g, Güç kaynağı: 91 g
Fiyat
1129 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85 %
07/2020
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
i5-L16G7, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
940 g11.8 mm13.3"1920x1080
86 %
09/2019
Samsung Galaxy Book S
SD 8cx, Adreno 680
951 g11.8 mm13.3"1920x1080
90 %
06/2020
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
i3-1000NG4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
1.3 kg16.1 mm13.3"2560x1600
89 %
03/2020
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
1.2 kg14.8 mm13.4"1920x1200
86 %
06/2020
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
1.2 kg16.6 mm13.5"2256x1504
84 %
03/2020
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1.3 kg14.5 mm13.5"2256x1504

Kasa - Intel SKU da 1 kg'ın altında

Galaxy Book S'nin Intel sürümü 940 gramda biraz daha hafif, ancak doğrudan karşılaştırmada bile fark edilmiyor. Kompakt güç adaptörüyle (USB-C kablosu dahil 91 gram / 3,2 oz) toplam seyahat ağırlığı hala 1 kg'ın (~ 2,2 lb) biraz üzerindedir.

Boyut Karşılaştırma

308 mm 223 mm 14.5 mm 1.3 kg304.1 mm 212.4 mm 16.1 mm 1.3 kg302 mm 234 mm 16.6 mm 1.2 kg305.2 mm 203.2 mm 11.8 mm 940 g296 mm 199 mm 14.8 mm 1.2 kg

Bağlantı - Wi-Fi 6 özellikli Galaxy Book S

microSD reader at the bottom
microSD reader at the bottom

Bağlantı noktaları, Galaxy Book S'nin ARM sürümü ile aynıdır. Her iki tarafta da dizüstü bilgisayarı şarj etmek için kullanılabilecek bir USB-C bağlantı noktası vardır (USB 3.1 Gen.1 w / DisplayPort-Alt). Ayrıca 3,5 mm stereo jak ve microSD okuyucu da edinebilirsiniz. Toshiba (Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) referans kartımızla birlikte maksimum aktarım hızı 82,4 MB / s'dir, bu nedenle ARM modeliyle aynıdır. Resimleri kopyaladığınızda ortalama aktarım hızı 63,9 MB / s'de biraz daha düşüktür.Samsung Alman modelini bir LTE modemi ile göndermez, bu nedenle ARM SKU'nun en büyük avantajlarından biri gitti. Buna karşılık, müşteriler Intel'den (AX200) biraz daha hızlı bir Wi-Fi 6 modülü alıyorlar, ancak Netgear yönlendiricimiz (Nighthawk AX12) ile birlikte aktarım oranları beklentilerimizin altında. Sonuçlar ARM Galaxy Book S ile karşılaştırıldığında daha iyidir, ancak çoğu kullanıcı muhtemelen farkı fark etmeyecektir.

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
157 MB/s ∼100% +146%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
68.9 MB/s ∼44% +8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8 - 186, n=139)
64 MB/s ∼41% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
63.9 MB/s ∼41%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
195.6 MB/s ∼100% +137%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
82.4 MB/s ∼42% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
82.4 MB/s ∼42%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (17.7 - 251, n=141)
80.3 MB/s ∼41% -3%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1460 MBit/s ∼100% +45%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1251 (min: 803, max: 1358) MBit/s ∼86% +24%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (523 - 1620, n=46)
1092 MBit/s ∼75% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1007 (min: 635, max: 1216) MBit/s ∼69%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
870 (min: 832, max: 928) MBit/s ∼60% -14%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
641 (min: 554, max: 678) MBit/s ∼44% -36%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (30.9 - 1658, n=164)
599 MBit/s ∼41% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
535 (min: 503, max: 564) MBit/s ∼37% -47%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1484 (min: 1342, max: 1614) MBit/s ∼100% +82%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (553 - 1645, n=45)
1028 MBit/s ∼69% +26%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
906 MBit/s ∼61% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
814 (min: 528, max: 898) MBit/s ∼55%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
696 (min: 679, max: 711) MBit/s ∼47% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
606 (min: 307, max: 618) MBit/s ∼41% -26%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (36 - 1416, n=164)
577 MBit/s ∼39% -29%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
545 (min: 414, max: 604) MBit/s ∼37% -33%
020040060080010001200Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1007 (635-1216)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø814 (528-898)

Giriş Aygıtları - Klavye aydınlatması hala zor kullanılabilir

Keyboard illumination on full brightness
Keyboard illumination on full brightness

Giriş aygıtları yakın zamanda gözden geçirilmiş ARM modeliyle aynıdır. Bununla birlikte, Dünyevi Altın'daki test birimimizin yeşil klavye aydınlatması değil, beyaz bir aydınlatması var. Temel sorun yine de aynıdır, çünkü arka ışık sağ alt ekran çerçevesine oturan bir sensör tarafından kontrol edilir. Sensör aydınlatmayı yalnızca neredeyse siyah renkte olduğunda etkinleştirir ve loş ortamlarda etkinleştiremezdik. Klavyenin görünürlüğü de renk nedeniyle mükemmel değil ve birçok durumda manuel kontrol istedik. Aydınlatma da biraz daha güçlü olabilir. Samsung bu sorunu kesinlikle çözmelidir.

Ekran - Dış Mekan Modu çok daha parlak

Subpixel array
Subpixel array

Özelliklere hızlı bir bakış, Samsung'un aynı 1080p dokunmatik ekranı kullandığını ve ölçüm sonuçlarımızın da çoğunlukla benzer olduğunu gösteriyor, ancak iki önemli fark var: Intel SKU, parlaklığı artıran Dış Mekan modunu destekliyor. ~ 650 cd / m². Herhangi bir PWM titremesini de tespit edemiyoruz, bu da ARM Galaxy Book S'de olduğu gibi. Bu nedenle, farklı bir panel gibi görünüyor (ARM modelinde tam panel kimliğini bulamadık). ARM modeline benzer şekilde, öznel resim izlenimi çok iyi. Entegre parlaklık sensörü yalnızca klavye aydınlatmasını kontrol eder; Not: Samsung, Dış Mekan modunun parlaklığı önemli ölçüde artıracağını ve bu da güç tüketimini artıracağını söylüyor. Dış mekan modu, örneğin ekranı kapattığınızda veya kapağı kapattığınızda da otomatik olarak devre dışı bırakılır. Modu her zaman manuel olarak etkinleştirmeniz gerekir, bu nedenle derecelendirmemiz için sonuçları (hem güç tüketimi hem de pil çalışma süresi için) Dış Mekan modu olmadan kullanırız.

358
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
355
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
BOE07E7
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 385 cd/m² Ortalama: 353.6 cd/m² Minimum: 9.7 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 88 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 387 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1283:1 (Siyah: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 2.2
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6
97.2% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 65.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
BOE07E7, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Samsung Galaxy Book S
BOE, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
APPA042, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
SHP14CB, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
BOE08BC, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Sharp LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5
Response Times
6%
16%
-13%
0%
-27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
51.2 (24.4, 26.8)
48.8 (22, 26.8)
5%
38.4 (20.4, 18)
25%
60 (28.4, 31.6)
-17%
50 (24, 26)
2%
59.2 (28.4, 30.8)
-16%
Response Time Black / White *
30.4 (18, 12.4)
28.4 (16.4, 12)
7%
28.4 (16, 12.4)
7%
33.2 (16.4, 16.8)
-9%
31 (18, 13)
-2%
41.6 (23.6, 18)
-37%
PWM Frequency
9524 (20)
119000 (75)
2500 (20)
192 (90)
21740 (51)
Screen
2%
29%
17%
6%
23%
Brightness middle
385
383
-1%
416
8%
619
61%
456
18%
403.4
5%
Brightness
354
355
0%
403
14%
591
67%
432
22%
397
12%
Brightness Distribution
88
88
0%
95
8%
91
3%
88
0%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.3
0.36
-20%
0.34
-13%
0.35
-17%
0.32
-7%
0.34
-13%
Contrast
1283
1064
-17%
1224
-5%
1769
38%
1425
11%
1186
-8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.8
3.1
18%
0.9
76%
3
21%
3.49
8%
0.94
75%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.4
5.3
17%
1.4
78%
8.2
-28%
8.4
-31%
2.92
54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.2
0.6
73%
1
55%
0.72
67%
0.99
55%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.6
3.6
22%
1
78%
5.2
-13%
5.53
-20%
0.9
80%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2 110%
2.2 100%
2.14 103%
2.41 91%
2.13 103%
CCT
7424 88%
6743 96%
6629 98%
6340 103%
6675 97%
6620 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
65.3
63.9
-2%
66.9
2%
65
0%
62.3
-5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.2
97.6
0%
99.3
2%
100
3%
98.7
2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 3%
23% / 27%
2% / 13%
3% / 5%
-2% / 16%

* ... smaller is better

Ortalama parlaklık bir kez daha 350 cd / m² civarında ve kontrast oranı 1200: 1'de çok iyi. Kutunun dışında hafif bir mavi döküm var ve renk sıcaklığı da biraz fazla serin. Galaxy Book S'nin ARM modelinin aksine, bu kez ekranı kalibre etmek sorun değildi ve sonuçlar önemli ölçüde iyileşti. Hafif renk tonu tamamen kayboldu ve renk sapmaları da daha düşük. Sadece% 100 mavi hala önemli işaretin üzerindedir (3). Kalibre edilmiş görüntü profilini yukarıdaki kutudan indirebilirsiniz.

CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN Grayscale calibrated
CalMAN Grayscale calibrated
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps calibrated
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps calibrated
CalMAN ColorChecker calibrated
CalMAN ColorChecker calibrated
CalMAN Grayscale Outdoor+ mode
CalMAN Grayscale Outdoor+ mode

Küçük sRGB renk gamı neredeyse tamamen kaplıdır, düşük renk sapmaları ile birlikte, küçük renk alanındaki resimleri / videoları düzenlemek için ekranı da kullanabilirsiniz. Ekranı Dış Mekan moduyla da kontrol ettik ve çok daha yüksek parlaklık öznel görüntü kalitesini etkilemez. Siyah değer biraz acı çekiyor, ancak genel kontrast oranı hala 1200: 1 civarında.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
51.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24.4 ms rise
↘ 26.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17893 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Dizüstü bilgisayarı dış mekanlarda kullandığınızda standart ve Dış mekan modu arasındaki farkı görebilirsiniz, ancak parlak ekrandaki yansımalar hala büyük bir sorundur ve kameradaki iki mod arasındaki farkı yakalamak kolay değildir. Mümkünse yine de ışık kaynaklarından veya parlak yüzeylerden yansımalardan kaçınmalısınız.

Outdoors (Standard)
Outdoors (Standard)
Outdoors (Outdoor+ mode)
Outdoors (Outdoor+ mode)

Performans - Düşük TDP'ye sahip Galaxy Book S

Intel Lakefield hibrit işlemci yepyeni ve birçok aracın doğru verileri göstermede hala sorunları var. Teorik olarak, Core i5-L16G7'nin 7 watt'lık bir TDP'si var (9,5W Burst). Ancak Intel'den edindiğimiz bilgilere göre Samsung, PowerLimit 1'i 7'den 5 watt'a düşürdü (PL2 hala 9,5W'da). Bu, aşağıdaki sonuçların belirtilen 7 / 9.5 watt ile çalışması durumunda Lakefield işlemcisinin performansını temsil etmediği anlamına gelir.Not: Galaxy Book S'nin orijinal Alman incelemesinin yayınlanmasından kısa bir süre sonra, Samsung ile ilgili resmi bir açıklama aldık. Lakefield işlemcinin güç tüketimi. Samsung'un önümüzdeki iki hafta içinde bir güncelleme ile TDP'yi 5 ila 7 watt arasında artırmayı planladığını belirtti. Güncelleme hazır olduğunda, performans ve yüzey sıcaklıklarına bir kez daha bakacağız.

İşlemci - Hibrit İşlemcili Galaxy Book S

Intel Lakefield Hybrid CPU (Source: Intel)
Intel Lakefield Hybrid CPU (Source: Intel)

Core i5-L16G7 Intel'in ilk hibrit işlemcisidir ve dört verimli Atom çekirdeğini (Tremont çekirdeği, 10 nm, 2,8 GHz Boost'a kadar) hızlı Sunny Cove çekirdeği (10 nm, 3,0 GHz'e kadar) ile birleştirir. mevcut Buz Gölü CPU'ları. Hiper iş parçacığı desteklenmediğinden, her çekirdek yalnızca bir iş parçacığı yürütebilir. Mimari hakkında daha fazla bilgi için lütfen teknoloji bölümümüze bakın. İşletim sistemi, yükün çekirdekler arasında nasıl dağıtılacağına karar verir, ancak uygulamaların hızlı çekirdeği kullanmak için hibrit işlemciyi de desteklemesi gerekir. İlk testlerimizin sonuçları oldukça akılcıydı, çünkü hızlı Sunny Cove çekirdeği gerçekten kullanılmadı. Yani temelde dört çekirdekli Atom işlemcisi ile uğraşıyorduk. Belirli bir işlem için daha hızlı çekirdeği atamak için Görev yöneticisini kullanabilirsiniz, ancak bu pratikte uygun değildir. Cinebench R15 tek çekirdekli test, daha hızlı Sunny Cove çekirdeğini manuel olarak seçtiğimizde 88'den 111 noktaya (% 26) geliştirildi. Cinebench R20, uygulamaların desteklenmesi için iyi bir örnektir (aşağıdaki ekran görüntülerine bakın). Sürüm 20.040 hızlı çekirdeği etkin bir şekilde kullanamaz; 5 iş parçacığının yürütüldüğünü görebiliriz, ancak beşinci çekirdek fazla yük görmüyor. Bu, tüm çekirdeklerin tam olarak kullanıldığı 20.060 sürümü ile değişir.

CB R20.040 Multi
CB R20.040 Multi
CB R20.060 Multi
CB R20.060 Multi
CB R20.040 CB R20.060 Difference
Single-Core 182 Pts 276 Pts +51 %
Multi-Core 479 Pts 609 Pts +22 %

Uygulamalar, özellikle düşük TDP'yi göz önünde bulundurarak, uygulamalar hibrid işlemciyi desteklediğinde performans oldukça iyidir. Mevcut MacBook Air'in Core i3-1000NG4'ü (Ice Lake-Y, 2 çekirdek / 4 iplik) iyi bir karşılaştırma. İkincisi, daha yüksek saat nedeniyle tek çekirdekli testte yaklaşık% 26 daha hızlıdır, ancak Lakefield çipi çok çekirdekli testte aslında biraz daha hızlıdır. Bu oldukça dikkat çekicidir, çünkü MacBook Air'deki Core i3 10-11 watt tüketir, ancak Lakefield i5 5 watt ile sınırlıdır.Uygulamaların desteği şu anda hala büyük bir sorundur. Cinebench R15 Multi loop'umuz beşinci çekirdeği kullanmaz, bu nedenle bu durumda yalnızca Core i3-1000NG4'ün arkasındaki dört Atom çekirdeğinin performansını elde edersiniz. Farklı güç tüketimlerini düşündüğünüzde sonuçlar hala kötü değil. Bu arada, pil gücünde performans azalmaz.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel Intel Core i5-L16G7, Intel Core i5-L16G7: Ø253 (249.12-254.89)
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 Intel Core i3-1000NG4, Intel Core i3-1000NG4: Ø297 (292.93-332.83)
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS Intel Core i5-1035G4, Intel Core i5-1035G4: Ø457 (453.59-490.1)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) - CPU (Single Core)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
439 Points ∼100% +59%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
425 Points ∼97% +54%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
357 Points ∼81% +29%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
357 Points ∼81% +29%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (73 - 466, n=59)
353 Points ∼80% +28%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
348 Points ∼79% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
276 Points ∼63%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
276 Points ∼63% 0%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) - CPU (Multi Core)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
1630 Points ∼100% +168%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
1533 Points ∼94% +152%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (110 - 2410, n=59)
1169 Points ∼72% +92%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
892 Points ∼55% +46%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
892 Points ∼55% +46%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
609 Points ∼37%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
609 Points ∼37% 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
587 Points ∼36% -4%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit - CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
172 Points ∼100% +95%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
166 Points ∼97% +88%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
146.36 Points ∼85% +66%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
141 Points ∼82% +60%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20 - 185, n=318)
120 Points ∼70% +36%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
88.3 Points ∼51%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
88.3 Points ∼51% 0%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit - CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
736 Points ∼100% +189%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
667 Points ∼91% +162%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
659 Points ∼90% +158%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
490.1 (min: 289.98, max: 451.62) Points ∼67% +92%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (32 - 1051, n=332)
376 Points ∼51% +47%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
333 (min: 293, max: 333) Points ∼45% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
255 (min: 249.12, max: 254.89) Points ∼35%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
255 Points ∼35% 0%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU - BMW27 CPU
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
2156 Seconds * ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
2156 Seconds * ∼100% -0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
1814 Seconds * ∼84% +16%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4.2 - 6277, n=51)
1296 Seconds * ∼60% +40%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
1016.4 Seconds * ∼47% +53%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
1016 Seconds * ∼47% +53%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
771 Seconds * ∼36% +64%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
766 Seconds * ∼36% +64%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 - 7z b 4 -mmt1
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
4252 MIPS ∼100% +34%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
4087 MIPS ∼96% +29%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
4048 MIPS ∼95% +28%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
4048 MIPS ∼95% +28%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1653 - 15198, n=46)
4033 MIPS ∼95% +27%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
3438 MIPS ∼81% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
3174 MIPS ∼75%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
3174 MIPS ∼75% 0%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 - 7z b 4
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
19168 MIPS ∼100% +165%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
18535 MIPS ∼97% +156%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2692 - 27115, n=46)
14820 MIPS ∼77% +105%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
13057 MIPS ∼68% +81%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
13057 MIPS ∼68% +81%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
7921 MIPS ∼41% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
7230 MIPS ∼38%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
7230 MIPS ∼38% 0%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
1229 Points ∼100% +54%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
1096 Points ∼89% +38%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
1081 Points ∼88% +36%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
1081 Points ∼88% +36%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (310 - 1324, n=41)
955 Points ∼78% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
797 Points ∼65%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
797 Points ∼65% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
700 Points ∼57% -12%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
4372 Points ∼100% +203%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
3261 Points ∼75% +126%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
3261 Points ∼75% +126%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (591 - 4855, n=41)
3014 Points ∼69% +109%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
2760 Points ∼63% +92%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
2028 Points ∼46% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
1441 Points ∼33%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
1441 Points ∼33% 0%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset - 4k Preset
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
4.632 fps ∼100% +222%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
4.27 fps ∼92% +197%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.63 - 7.81, n=46)
3.85 fps ∼83% +167%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
3.37 fps ∼73% +134%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
3.37 fps ∼73% +134%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
2.23 fps ∼48% +55%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
1.44 fps ∼31%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
1.44 fps ∼31% 0%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF - 20 Documents To PDF
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
97.8 s ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
89.3 s ∼91%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
89.3 s ∼91% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (32.3 - 281, n=31)
89 s ∼91% 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
78.33 s ∼80% -12%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
78.3 s ∼80% -12%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
0.02 s ∼0% -100%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean - Overall mean
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
0.987 sec * ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
0.987 sec * ∼100% -0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.629 - 2.43, n=36)
0.922 sec * ∼93% +7%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
0.918 sec * ∼93% +7%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
0.825 sec * ∼84% +16%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
0.825 sec * ∼84% +16%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
0.722 sec * ∼73% +27%

* ... smaller is better

The browser benchmarks are ideal to compare the Lakefield processor with the ARM Galaxy Book S. The Snapdragon CPU is just beaten in these tests, and the Lakefield chip is clearly beaten by all the other rivals in the majority of benchmarks.

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
194 Points ∼100% +60%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
175 Points ∼90% +45%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
175 Points ∼90% +45%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
162 Points ∼84% +34%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (49.2 - 224, n=40)
148 Points ∼76% +22%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
121 Points ∼62%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
121 Points ∼62% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
116 Points ∼60% -4%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
118.2 Points ∼100% +33%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (33.9 - 143, n=14)
101 Points ∼85% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
88.7 Points ∼75%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
88.7 Points ∼75% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
73.5 Points ∼62% -17%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
249.77 Points ∼100% +61%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
249.7 Points ∼100% +61%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
240 Points ∼96% +55%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
208.7 Points ∼84% +35%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (34.8 - 297, n=164)
191 Points ∼76% +23%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
155 Points ∼62% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
154.8 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
134.1 Points ∼54% -13%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
98.8 runs/min ∼100% +30%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
76 runs/min ∼77%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
76 runs/min ∼77% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (12.6 - 130, n=20)
68.9 runs/min ∼70% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
59.3 runs/min ∼60% -22%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
58.1 runs/min ∼59% -24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
39043 Points ∼100% +16%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
35150 Points ∼90% +4%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
34726 Points ∼89% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
33682 Points ∼86%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
33682 Points ∼86% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
29364 Points ∼75% -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3963 - 50464, n=176)
26586 Points ∼68% -21%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (740 - 30250, n=203)
1831 ms * ∼100% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
1464.2 ms * ∼80% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel Core i5-L16G7
1303 ms * ∼71%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7
 
1303 ms * ∼71% -0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
1063.3 ms * ∼58% +18%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
965 ms * ∼53% +26%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
924 ms * ∼50% +29%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4
924 ms * ∼50% +29%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1
886 ms * ∼48% +32%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
9003
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4079
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
20.69 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.18 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.42 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
255 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
29.1 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
88.3 Points
Yardım

System Performance

The subjective performance impression of the Intel based Galaxy Book S is very good. The device also benefits from the "bad" distribution of the load among the cores. If one core is still available even when you stress the device, the system will still react quickly to inputs and there are no stutters, even during benchmarks. There should not be any problems when you only do daily stuff, and contrary to the ARM based Galaxy Book S, you can install and use all apps without any compatibility issues.

The overall performance level in the synthetic PCMark benchmarks is very low; the comparison devices with 15W processors just have an advantage.

PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
3817 Points ∼100% +108%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
3281 Points ∼86% +79%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), i5-1035G4, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
3048 Points ∼80% +66%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (405 - 4728, n=132)
2625 Points ∼69% +43%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), i5-L16G7, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1838 Points ∼48%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7, Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
 
1838 Points ∼48% 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), i3-1000NG4, Apple SSD AP0256
1521 Points ∼40% -17%
Productivity
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
6766 Points ∼100% +98%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
6765 Points ∼100% +98%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), i5-1035G4, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
6414 Points ∼95% +88%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1014 - 7676, n=132)
5352 Points ∼79% +57%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), i3-1000NG4, Apple SSD AP0256
3620 Points ∼54% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), i5-L16G7, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3409 Points ∼50%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7, Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
 
3409 Points ∼50% 0%
Essentials
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
9086 Points ∼100% +62%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
8568 Points ∼94% +53%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), i5-1035G4, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
7558 Points ∼83% +35%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2062 - 9664, n=132)
7053 Points ∼78% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), i5-L16G7, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
5613 Points ∼62%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7, Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
 
5613 Points ∼62% 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), i3-1000NG4, Apple SSD AP0256
5464 Points ∼60% -3%
Score
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
4421 Points ∼100% +88%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
4122 Points ∼93% +76%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), i5-1035G4, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
3790 Points ∼86% +61%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (743 - 4886, n=135)
3283 Points ∼74% +40%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), i5-L16G7, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2348 Points ∼53%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7, Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
 
2348 Points ∼53% 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), i3-1000NG4, Apple SSD AP0256
2229 Points ∼50% -5%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
4832 Points ∼100% +117%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
4755 Points ∼98% +114%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1283 - 5363, n=246)
4090 Points ∼85% +84%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), i5-L16G7, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2227 Points ∼46%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7, Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
 
2227 Points ∼46% 0%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
3988 Points ∼100% +42%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
3725 Points ∼93% +32%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1027 - 4251, n=275)
3093 Points ∼78% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), i5-L16G7, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2813 Points ∼71%
Average Intel Core i5-L16G7, Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
 
2813 Points ∼71% 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), i3-1000NG4, Apple SSD AP0256
2701 Points ∼68% -4%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2813 puan
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3779 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
2227 puan
Yardım

DPC-Latency - Galaxy Book S with problems

Our standardized latency test (web browsing, YouTube 4K, load by Prime95) reveals problems, so the Galaxy Book S is not suited for real-time audio applications.

LatencyMon Main
LatencyMon Main
LatencyMon Drivers
LatencyMon Drivers
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), i5-1035G4, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
1997.3 μs * ∼100% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), i5-L16G7, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1576.1 μs * ∼79%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
1368 μs * ∼68% +13%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Solution - Galaxy Book S with UFS storage

Samsung once again uses UFS 3.0 storage for the Galaxy Book S with a storage capacity of 256 GB. After the initial installation, you can use around 187 GB. The performance of the drive is superior to conventional hard drives, but real PCIe-SSDs in the competitors are just much faster.

Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Samsung Galaxy Book S
256 GB NVMe
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Apple SSD AP0256
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-3%
91%
252%
156%
122%
0%
Write 4K
37.71
30.59
-19%
34.57
-8%
121.88
223%
120.6
220%
112.3
198%
37.7
0%
Read 4K
11
20.26
84%
28.48
159%
50.01
355%
46.88
326%
42.13
283%
11
0%
Write Seq
403.14
421.36
5%
1026.35
155%
1497.33
271%
1044
159%
630.4
56%
403
0%
Read Seq
768.74
1232.08
60%
1109.01
44%
2110.65
175%
1147
49%
1023
33%
769
0%
Write 4K Q32T1
155.87
39.17
-75%
178.44
14%
365.85
135%
332.4
113%
336.6
116%
156
0%
Read 4K Q32T1
195.61
41.14
-79%
556.73
185%
384.57
97%
443.3
127%
399.6
104%
196
0%
Write Seq Q32T1
407.9
420.9
3%
969.9
138%
2748.2
574%
1052
158%
820.8
101%
408
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
1102.1
1046.6
-5%
1512.7
37%
3119.1
183%
2171
97%
2030
84%
1102
0%
AS SSD
11%
38%
211%
156%
78%
0%
Copy Game MB/s
366.64
368.39
0%
367
0%
Copy Program MB/s
190
256.11
35%
190
0%
Copy ISO MB/s
368.87
763.78
107%
369
0%
Score Total
1014
1086
7%
1365
35%
3189
214%
2370
134%
1520
50%
1014
0%
Score Write
306
304
-1%
290
-5%
1455
375%
926
203%
525
72%
306
0%
Score Read
486
539
11%
713
47%
1180
143%
958
97%
678
40%
486
0%
Access Time Write *
0.144
0.093
35%
0.058
60%
0.033
77%
0.034
76%
0.093
35%
0.144
-0%
Access Time Read *
0.232
0.126
46%
0.085
63%
0.055
76%
0.232
-0%
4K-64 Write
245.42
229.51
-6%
154.55
-37%
1220.39
397%
712.91
190%
354.86
45%
245
0%
4K-64 Read
373.46
415.06
11%
584.73
57%
899.28
141%
769.89
106%
497.4
33%
373
0%
4K Write
25.69
35.99
40%
26.27
2%
120.63
370%
111.15
333%
119.96
367%
25.7
0%
4K Read
17.79
16.64
-6%
14.87
-16%
48.07
170%
50.81
186%
42.35
138%
17.8
0%
Seq Write
349
382
9%
1090
212%
1137
226%
1019.09
192%
503.83
44%
349
0%
Seq Read
945
1069
13%
1135
20%
2328
146%
1370.49
45%
1387.11
47%
945
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 5%
65% / 60%
232% / 228%
156% / 156%
100% / 94%
0% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1102.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 407.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 195.61 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 155.87 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 768.74 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 403.14 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 11 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 37.71 MB/s

Sustained Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110Tooltip
: Ø1102 (993.84-1106.04)

GPU Performance - Throttled Ice-Lake-iGPU

GPU-Z Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2)
GPU-Z Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2)

The integrated graphics adapter is basically the fast G7-iGPU we know from the Ice Lake processors. Because of the low TDP, however, the core clock is much lower. The performance in the synthetic is more comparable to the old Intel UHD Graphics 620.

The iGPU is well-suited for everyday situation, and the video decoder has no problems with the playback of high-resolution videos.

Gaming is not great on the Galaxy Book S. The graphics performance drops after a little while (Fire Strike stress test not passed at 82%) and even simple titles hardly reach playable frame rates, which is also a result of the low CPU performance. You should focus on very simple titles from the Windows Store (like card games, for example).

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G7
4279 Points ∼100% +158%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G4
2809 Points ∼66% +69%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1
2578 Points ∼60% +55%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Intel Core i3-1000NG4
1941 Points ∼45% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), Intel Core i5-L16G7
1658 Points ∼39%
Average Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
 
1658 Points ∼39% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Adreno 680, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
1593 Points ∼37% -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (230 - 11501, n=404)
1487 Points ∼35% -10%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G7
794 Points ∼100% +128%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (85 - 3098, n=66)
626 Points ∼79% +79%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1
472 Points ∼59% +35%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), Intel Core i5-L16G7
349 Points ∼44%
Average Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
 
349 Points ∼44% 0%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G7
2692 Points ∼100% +121%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G4
1995 Points ∼74% +64%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1
1755 Points ∼65% +44%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), Intel Core i5-L16G7
1217 Points ∼45%
Average Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
 
1217 Points ∼45% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (222 - 8093, n=283)
1187 Points ∼44% -2%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Intel Core i3-1000NG4
922 Points ∼34% -24%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G7
16695 Points ∼100% +121%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1
12698 Points ∼76% +68%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1484 - 30436, n=301)
8317 Points ∼50% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), Intel Core i5-L16G7
7556 Points ∼45%
Average Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
 
7556 Points ∼45% 0%
3DMark 11 Performance
1711 puan
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
39624 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5516 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1104 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score
389 puan
Yardım
düşük orta yüksek ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 32.5 18.6 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 12.1 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 46.5 17.9 12.7 12 fps
Rocket League (2017) 23 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 16.9 9.61 9.05 fps

Emissions - Intel version of the Galaxy Book S is also passively cooled

System Noise

Similar to the ARM model, the Intel processor in the Galaxy Book S is passively cooled and we did not notice any other electronic sounds, either.

Temperature

Stress test
Stress test

The surface temperatures are pretty interesting, because they are significantly lower compared to the ARM based Galaxy Book S. We can only measure 40 °C (104 °F) at the bottom at one spot, all the other measurement spots are much cooler. This begs the question why Samsung has reduced the TDP of the processor; the surface temperatures still have some headroom.

We were not able to see the GPU clock during the stress test. The CPU cores are clearly below the 1 GHz mark and you see that Prime95 is not optimized for the hybrid processor.

Maksimum yük
 33.9 °C38.1 °C37.2 °C 
 32.5 °C36.2 °C35.3 °C 
 31.2 °C32.4 °C32.1 °C 
Maksimum: 38.1 °C
Ortalama: 34.3 °C
38.3 °C40 °C34.8 °C
37.9 °C38.7 °C34.2 °C
32.8 °C33.1 °C33.2 °C
Maksimum: 40 °C
Ortalama: 35.9 °C
Güç kaynağı  38 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.4 °C / 90.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.5 °C / 83.3 F (-3.9 °C / -7 F).
Surface temperatures stress test (top)
Surface temperatures stress test (top)
Surface temperatures stress test (bottom)
Surface temperatures stress test (bottom)

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Our consumption measurements are pretty interesting, because the Intel version draws more power than the ARM Galaxy Book S in every scenario. There are still advantages compared to rivals with 15W CPUs, bit the difference is often not that big. The power consumption during the stress test quickly drops from 20 to about 13 watts, so the included 25W power adapter is completely sufficient. The idle consumption is increased by 2W when you activate the Outdoor+ mode.

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.06 / 0.94 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 2.5 / 4.8 / 6 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 14.9 / 20.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
i5-L16G7, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Samsung Galaxy Book S
SD 8cx, Adreno 680, 256 GB NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
i3-1000NG4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5
Average Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
17%
-30%
-84%
-39%
-112%
0%
-116%
Idle Minimum *
2.5
1.61
36%
2.1
16%
3.4
-36%
3
-20%
4.4
-76%
2.5
-0%
6.43 (1 - 36, n=643)
-157%
Idle Average *
4.8
4.3
10%
6.2
-29%
6
-25%
6.1
-27%
7.5
-56%
4.8
-0%
9.64 (2.06 - 39, n=643)
-101%
Idle Maximum *
6
5
17%
7
-17%
10.2
-70%
8.4
-40%
7.8
-30%
6
-0%
11.9 (3.9 - 55, n=643)
-98%
Load Average *
14.9
13.2
11%
24.7
-66%
36.6
-146%
25.7
-72%
41.9
-181%
14.9
-0%
33.4 (6.3 - 75, n=633)
-124%
Load Maximum *
20.1
18.3
9%
30.6
-52%
49.3
-145%
27.6
-37%
63.9
-218%
20.1
-0%
40.6 (7.6 - 111, n=636)
-102%
Witcher 3 ultra *
40.8

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime - Intel version of the Galaxy Book S with reduced stamina

Wi-Fi runtime Outdoor+ mode: 5:15 hours
Wi-Fi runtime Outdoor+ mode: 5:15 hours

The increased power consumption also results in much shorter battery runtimes compared to the ARM model and even the other comparison devices last longer. This means one big advantage of the ARM based Galaxy Book S is gone.

We determine almost 10 hours during our Wi-Fi test at a luminance of 150 cd/m², and about 7 hours with the maximum brightness. If you activate the Outdoor+ mode to use the ~650 cd/m², the runtime drops to little more than 5 hours. The charging time is around 2.5 hours.

Batarya ömrü
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 83.0.478.56)
9h 51min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 max Brightness (Edge 83.0.478.56)
7h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 58min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
3h 53min
Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel
i5-L16G7, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), 42 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Book S
SD 8cx, Adreno 680, 42 Wh
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
i3-1000NG4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 49.9 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 52 Wh
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 54.5 Wh
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 45 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
67%
3%
9%
10%
-34%
-31%
H.264
718
1312
83%
666
-7%
866
21%
509 (182 - 1312, n=133)
-29%
WiFi v1.3
591
953
61%
661
12%
703
19%
648
10%
495
-16%
495 (206 - 991, n=263)
-16%
Load
233
369
58%
205
-12%
112
-52%
123 (40 - 369, n=581)
-47%

Artılar

+ sağlam ve hafif şasi
+ iyi pil çalışma süresi
+ Dış mekan + modu çok daha parlak
+ harika hoparlörler
+ iyi günlük performans
+ tam uygulama uyumluluğu

Eksiler

- sadece USB-C
- klavye aydınlatması çok karanlık
- entegre LTE yok (Almanca SKU)
- karma işlemci, optimum performans için ayarlanmış uygulamalar gerektirir

Verdict - Galaxy Book S is in a tricky spot

In review: Samsung Galaxy Book S
In review: Samsung Galaxy Book S

It is not easy to find a verdict for the Samsung's Galaxy Book S with Intel's new hybrid processor. The first rival is obviously the ARM model, which costs about the same. The latter has some advantages, like the extremely long battery runtimes and obviously the integrated LTE module. Both versions are passively cooled. The Intel model on the other hand introduces the much brighter Outdoor+ mode of the screen and is obviously compatible with 64-bit apps, so you can just use the Intel Galaxy Book S like a "normal" Windows laptop.

This leads us to the next comparison, because you can get much more powerful devices for around 1100 Euros (~$1243). These devices will be a bit heavier and are not passively cooled, but even offer longer battery runtimes, comparable display, and just much more performance, which will definitely be noticeable in the next couple of years. This is also the reason why we cannot recommend the galaxy Book S with the Intel processor.

The Galaxy Book S with the ARM processor had some advantages compared to "regular" Windows notebooks. The implementation of the Intel CPU improves compatibility, but some regions do not get the LTE modem, and the battery runtime is also much shorter. All in all, the competition just offers much better overall packages for the money.

The new Lakefield processor is pretty interesting, but it requires the support of applications. In the worst case, you just get the performance of a quad-core Atom processor. The efficiency can be great when it works, but we will have to wait and see if the concept will be successful. We will repeat some tests as soon as Samsung has released the update to increase the power consumption of the processor.

Samsung Galaxy Book S Intel - 07/10/2020 v7
Andreas Osthoff

İşcilik
84 / 98 → 86%
Klavye
80%
Mouse
88%
Bağlanılabilirlik
51 / 75 → 68%
Ağırlık
76 / 20-75 → 100%
Batarya
88%
Görüntü
84%
Oyun performansı
45 / 78 → 58%
Uygulama performansı
67 / 85 → 79%
Isınma
93%
Ses
100%
Audio
84 / 91 → 92%
Camera
34 / 85 → 40%
Ortalama
75%
85%
Subnotebook - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Samsung Galaxy Book S Laptop İnceleme: İlk sorunları ile Lakefield
Andreas Osthoff, 2020-07-26 (Update: 2020-07-26)
Andreas Osthoff
Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Notebooks
Aslinur Sarica
Translator: Aslinur Sarica - Translator