Dell Precision 5550 İş İstasyonu İncelemesi: Profesyoneller İçin XPS 15

Name: Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Brand: Dell

Powered by Nvidia Quadro. Precision 7550 gibi geleneksel iş istasyonu dizüstü bilgisayarlar asla değiştirilmeyecek olsa da, şık ultra ince iş istasyonlarına yönelik talep de artıyor. Precision 5550, profesyonel izleyicilere hitap etmek için XPS 15 9500'deki GeForce GPU'ları TUring Quadro GPU'larla değiştirir.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo, Published 08/30/2020 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 ...

Business Workstation Laptop / Notebook Comet Lake XPS

Precision 5540'ın tüketici XPS 15 7590'ın iş istasyonu sürümü olmasına çok benzer şekilde, yeni Precision 5550, XPS 15 9500'ün iş istasyonu sürümüdür. En son model, temelde aynı görsele sahip son nesil Precision 5540'a göre tam bir kasa güncellemesidir. tasarım ve XPS 15 9500 gibi özellikler. Bu nedenle, Precision 5550'nin fiziksel özellikleri hakkında daha fazla bilgi edinmek için XPS 15 9500'deki incelememize göz atmanızı öneririz. Precision 5550'nin benzersiz özellikleri, Core i9'u içerdiğinden büyük ölçüde dahilidir. 10885H vPro, Xeon W-10855M ve Nvidia Quadro T1000 ve T2000 Max-Q seçenekleri hiçbir XPS sisteminde bulunmaz. Yapılandırılmış birimimiz Core i7-10875H ve Quadro T2000 Max-Q ile yaklaşık 3000 ABD doları perakende satış fiyatıyla gelir.Bu alandaki rakipler arasında MSI WS serisi, Acer ConceptD 3 Pro, Razer Blade Studio veya HP gibi diğer ultra ince iş istasyonları yer alır. ZBook 15u serisi. Piyasada daha geleneksel iş istasyonları arayan kullanıcılar bunun yerine üst düzey Precision 7000 serisine bakmalıdır.Daha fazla Dell incelemesi: Alienware m15 R3XPS 17 9700Latitude 9510 2'si 1 aradaG5 15 SEInspiron 14

Test device courtesy of Dell US

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Dell Precision 5550 P91F (Precision Seri)

İşlemci

Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H

Grafik kartı

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q - 4 GB VRAM, Çekirdek: 1215 MHz, Bellek: 1250 MHz, GDDR6, 442.23, Optimus

Bellek

32 GB

, Samsung DDR4-3200, 21-21-21-47, Dual-Channel

Görüntü

15.60 inç 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 290 PPI, 10-point capacitive, Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, SHP14D0, Dell P/N: 90T02, parlak: evet, 60 Hz

Anakart

Intel WM490 (Comet Lake PCH-H)

Harddisk

SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB, 1024 GB

Ses kartı

Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS

Bağlantılar

3 USB 3.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm combo, Kart okuyucular: SD reader, Brightness Sensor

Network

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 4.1

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 18 x 344.72 x 230.14

Batarya

86 Wh Lithium-Polymer

İşletim sistemi

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Ek özellikler

Hoparlörler: 2.5 W x2 subwoofers, 1.5 W x2 tweeters, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, USB-C to USB-A and HDMI adapter, Dell Command, PremierColor, Power Manager, Optimizer, Digital Delivery, 36 Ay Garanti

Ağırlık

1.996 kg, Güç kaynağı: 481 g

Fiyat

3000 USD

Bağlantılar

Dell anasayfa
Dell notebook kısmı

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.3 %	08/2020	Dell Precision 5550 P91F i7-10875H, Quadro T2000 Max-Q	2 kg	18 mm	15.60"	3840x2400
86.9 %	03/2020	Dell Precision 5540 i9-9980HK, Quadro T2000 Max-Q	2 kg	17 mm	15.60"	3840x2160
87 %	08/2020	Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 i7-10875H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	2.2 kg	13.98 mm	15.60"	3840x2160
82.1 %	03/2020	Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 i7-9750H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	2.4 kg	23.4 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
89.8 %	12/2019	Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE i7-9850H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	2.7 kg	29.4 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
76 %		MSI WP65 i7-9750H, Quadro P620	1.9 kg	21.7 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Durum

Kasa, XPS 15 9500 ile aynıdır ancak gümüş yerine daha koyu mat gri tondadır. Bu aynı renk seçeneğini normal XPS için de görmek güzel olurdu.

Carbon fiber keyboard deck will collect fingerprints like no tomorrow

Some of the narrowest bezels and smallest dimensions of any 15-inch workstation

Hinges aren't as firm as what you'll find on a "traditional" workstation like the Precision 7550

Like other ultra-thin workstations, the Precision 5550 emphasizes portability at the cost of some higher GPU options

Significant chassis changes when compared to the outgoing Precision 5540

Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 MSI WP65 Dell Precision 5540 Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Dell Precision 5550 P91F DIN A4 ❌

Bağlantı

Right: USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C w/ PD, SD reader, 3.5 mm combo audio

Left: Noble Lock, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C port w/ Thunderbolt 3 and PD

SD Kart Okuyucu

SD kart okuyucusundan aktarım hızları XPS 15'teki gibi son derece hızlıdır. 1 GB'lık resmi UHS-II test kartımızdan masaüstüne taşımak yalnızca 5 ila 6 saniye sürer.

Fully inserted SD card reader still protrudes. The reader is not spring loaded

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Precision 5550 P91F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	193.1 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	185 MB/s -4%
Dell Precision 5540 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	173 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	78.3 MB/s -59%

İletişim

Intel AX201, Wi-Fi 6 ve Bluetooth 5.1 bağlantısı için standart olarak gelir. Netgear RAX200 test yönlendiricimizle eşleştirildiğinde hiçbir sorun yaşamadık.

Non-upgradeable WLAN module sits next to one of the M.2 storage slots

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1595 (1327^min - 1824^max) MBit/s +54%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1290 MBit/s +24%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s	1049 (862^min - 1225^max) MBit/s +1%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1037 (976^min - 1071^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s	1446 (653^min - 1555^max) MBit/s +3%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1404 (717^min - 1487^max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1368 (735^min - 1454^max) MBit/s -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1260 MBit/s -10%

Dell Precision 5550 P91F; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1403 (717-1487)

Dell Precision 5550 P91F; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1037 (976-1071)

Web kamerası

ColorChecker Dell Precision 5550 P91F: 8.14 ∆E min: 3.85 - max: 13.83 ∆E

Bakım

Metal alt panelin çıkarılması geçen yılki Precision 5540'a göre biraz daha zordur çünkü kenarlar ve köşeler daha keskin ve daha sıkıdır. Kullanıcılar artık lehimlendiği için WLAN modülüne hizmet veremezler.

The system utilizes a vapor chamber cooler for the CPU but not the GPU

Aksesuarlar ve Garanti

Tüm SKU'lar, her XPS 15 9500 siparişiyle birlikte gelen aynı USB-C - USB-A ve HDMI adaptörüyle gönderilir. Üç yıllık sınırlı garanti standart olarak gelir.

Giriş cihazları

Klavye ve Dokunmatik Yüzey

Keyboard layout remains the same as on the Precision 5540, but the clickpad is now significantly larger (15.1 x 9 cm)

Though great for cursor control, clicking is spongy and palm rejection isn't always reliable

Key travel is shallower and with lighter feedback than on the HP Spectre series

Up/Dn arrow keys are still cramped relative to other keys

Görüntüle

XPS 15 9500'deki aynı 4K UHD Sharp LQ156R1 IPS dokunmatik ekran burada Precision 5550'de bulunabilir. Bu muhtemelen bulabileceğiniz herhangi bir mobil iş istasyonunda bulunan en parlak parlak ekran olacak. Bununla birlikte, benzersiz 16:10 en-boy oranı, Precision 5550'nin şu anda herhangi bir OLED seçeneği taşımasını engeller. Böyle bir özellik sizin için önemliyse, eski Precision 5540'a bağlı kalmanız gerekir.

Very high screen to body ratio with edge-to-edge glass. Matte FHD is also available

Some of the narrowest bezels on any mobile workstation

Subpixels are crisp for a clean grain-free viewing experience

Minimal uneven backlight bleeding along the edges and corners


498.1 cd/m²	473.5 cd/m²	440.8 cd/m²
508.9 cd/m²	469.8 cd/m²	440 cd/m²
480.3 cd/m²	434.9 cd/m²	433.4 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

Sharp LQ156R1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 508.9 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 464.4 cd/m² Minimum: 27.9 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 85 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 469.8 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1119:1 (Siyah: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 3.75
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
89.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2

Download ICC Dosyası (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Dell Precision 5550 P91F Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2400	Dell Precision 5540 SDCA029, OLED, 15.60, 3840x2160	Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 15.60, 3840x2160	Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Chi Mei N156HCE-EN2, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE N156HCE-GN1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	MSI WP65 AU Optronics B156HAN02.1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Display		3%	3%	-1%	-24%	-52%
Display P3 Coverage	89.9	99.9 11%	99.9 11%	97.9 9%	63.2 -30%	39.46 -56%
sRGB Coverage	100	100 0%	100 0%	99.9 0%	92.9 -7%	58.8 -41%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	99.9	97.3 -3%	97.3 -3%	87.2 -13%	64.3 -36%	40.69 -59%
Response Times		93%	90%	32%	22%	19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	46 ?(24, 22)	2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6) 94%	4 ?(2, 2) 91%	33 ?(17, 16) 28%	38.4 ?(18.8, 19.6) 17%	37.6 ?(20.4, 17.2) 18%
Response Time Black / White *	34 ?(17.6, 16.4)	3.2 ?(1.2, 2) 91%	4 ?(2, 2) 88%	22 ?(14, 8) 35%	25.2 ?(15.2, 10) 26%	27.6 ?(15.2, 12.4) 19%
PWM Frequency		240.9 ?(50)			26040 ?(77)
Screen		14%	171%	14%	20%	-25%
Brightness middle	469.8	427 -9%	380 -19%	343 -27%	510 9%	267.4 -43%
Brightness	464	411 -11%	388 -16%	309 -33%	468 1%	259 -44%
Brightness Distribution	85	89 5%	93 9%	85 0%	89 5%	86 1%
Black Level *	0.42		0.018 96%	0.22 48%	0.36 14%	0.37 12%
Contrast	1119		21111 1787%	1559 39%	1417 27%	723 -35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.16	3.2 38%	5.47 -6%	3.73 28%	2.3 55%	4.21 18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.33	8.4 10%	8.19 12%	6.51 30%	5.5 41%	21.1 -126%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	3.75	2.8 25%	3.04 19%	1.43 62%	1.2 68%	4.27 -14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.5	1.8 67%	5.3 4%	4.24 23%	3.2 42%	2.3 58%
Gamma	2 ^110%	2.15 ^102%	2.15 ^102%	2.2 ^100%	2.34 ^94%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6198 ^105%	6176 ^105%	6128 ^106%	6329 ^103%	7036 ^92%	6578 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	89.2	86.8 -3%	86 -4%	78 -13%	59.4 -33%	37.2 -58%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	100	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	93.1 -7%	58.5 -41%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		37% / 23%	88% / 129%	15% / 14%	6% / 12%	-19% / -24%

* ... smaller is better

Renk alanı tüm sRGB'yi ve AdobeRGB'nin yaklaşık yüzde 90'ını, diğer birçok ileri teknoloji iş istasyonu veya multimedya dizüstü bilgisayarda olduğu gibi kapsar.

Bir X-Rite renk ölçer ile yapılan diğer ölçümler, kutudan çıkar çıkmaz aşırı sıcak renk sıcaklığını ortaya çıkarır. Paneli kendimiz kalibre etmek, ortalama gri tonlamalı DeltaE'yi 5,5'ten 0,7'ye düşürürken, işlem sırasında renk doğruluğunu biraz iyileştirir. Kullanıcılar ayrıca renkleri manuel olarak ayarlamak veya farklı profilleri kaydetmek için Dell PremierColor'u kullanabilir.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17.6 ms rise
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 24 ms rise
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Ekran diğer mobil iş istasyonlarının çoğundan daha parlak olmasına rağmen, parlak kaplama normalden daha fazla parlamaya katkıda bulunur. Görüntülenebilirliği en üst düzeye çıkarmak için parlaklığı artırmak ve mümkün olduğunda gölgede kalmak isteyeceksiniz.

Verim

Yapılandırmamız, orijinal XPS 15 9500 üzerindeki GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q'dan türetilen Quadro T2000 Max-Q'yu kullanır. Bir Quadro T1000 seçeneği de mevcuttur, ancak bunun standart T1000 mi yoksa T1000 Max mı olduğunu kesin olarak söyleyemeyiz. Q. Quadro T3000 Max-Q ve üstü gibi daha hızlı GPU'lar, Dell'in daha kalın ve daha yüksek kaliteli Precision 7550 serisi için ayrılmıştır. RAM, Xeon CPU ile yapılandırılırsa ECC desteğiyle 64 GB'a kadar yükseltilebilir. Nvidia Optimus, otomatik grafik değiştirme için Quadro SKU'larda standart olarak gelir.

İşlemci

Belki de şaşırtıcı olmayan bir şekilde, CPU performansı, XPS 15 9500'de kaydettiğimize en çok benziyor. Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition'da bulunanla aynı CPU, Dell Precision'ımızdan neredeyse yüzde 20 daha yavaş çalışıyor. Dört çekirdekli Core i5-10400H'den veya hexa-core Core i7-10750H'den sekiz çekirdekli Core i7-10875H'ye yükseltme yapan kullanıcılar, sırasıyla yaklaşık yüzde 60 ve yüzde 20 daha hızlı işlemci performansı görecek.

Dell Precision 5550 P91F Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1295 (1188.78-1518.72)

Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1292 (1148.9-1390.72)

Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16 Radeon Pro Vega 16, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP0512; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1238 (1170.34-1317.35)

Eluktronics RP-15 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PM81000GPMQCN28BTF-E12S4 M.2 NVM SSD; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1970 (1946.66-1995.21)

Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Eluktronics RP-15 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4663 Points +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	3762 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1986 - 4176, n=32)	3455 Points +1%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H	3429 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16 Intel Core i9-9880H	3012 Points -12%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Intel Core i7-10750H	2822 Points -18%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	2800 Points -18%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	2272 Points -34%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	2107 Points -39%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition Intel Core i7-9750H	2051 Points -40%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	494 Points 0%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H	492 Points
Eluktronics RP-15 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	489 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (430 - 524, n=32)	486 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	473 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16 Intel Core i9-9880H	465 Points -5%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Intel Core i7-10750H	457 Points -7%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	446 Points -9%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition Intel Core i7-9750H	436 Points -11%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	409 Points -17%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Eluktronics RP-15 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1995 (1946.66^min - 1995.21^max) Points +31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1799 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1003 - 1833, n=38)	1554 Points +2%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H	1519 (1188.78^min - 1518.72^max) Points
Dell Precision 5540 Intel Core i9-9980HK	1407 (1126.13^min - 1407^max) Points -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16 Intel Core i9-9880H	1317 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Intel Core i7-9850H	1230 (1097.03^min - 1230.35^max) Points -19%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Intel Core i7-10750H	1211 Points -20%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	1111 Points -27%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition Intel Core i7-9750H	985 Points -35%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	971 (541.45^min - 977.59^max) Points -36%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	889 (827.87^min - 893.75^max) Points -41%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	205 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (190 - 220, n=37)	204 Points 0%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H	203 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Intel Core i7-9850H	196.5 Points -3%
Dell Precision 5540 Intel Core i9-9980HK	193 Points -5%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	193 Points -5%
Eluktronics RP-15 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	189 Points -7%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Intel Core i7-10750H	187 Points -8%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	186 Points -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16 Intel Core i9-9880H	181 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition Intel Core i7-9750H	178 Points -12%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	174 Points -14%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	508 Seconds * -45%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	473 Seconds * -35%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	473 Seconds * -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Intel Core i7-9850H	415 Seconds * -18%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Intel Core i7-10750H	388.5 Seconds * -11%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	386.2 Seconds * -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16 Intel Core i9-9880H	384 Seconds * -9%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H	351 Seconds *
Dell Precision 5540 Intel Core i9-9980HK	348.4 Seconds * +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (259 - 535, n=30)	327 Seconds * +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	290.5 Seconds * +17%
Eluktronics RP-15 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	248 Seconds * +29%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H	5379 MIPS
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	5364 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5071 - 5780, n=31)	5360 MIPS 0%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	5310 MIPS -1%
Dell Precision 5540 Intel Core i9-9980HK	5283 MIPS -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Intel Core i7-9850H	5092 MIPS -5%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	4889 MIPS -9%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Intel Core i7-10750H	4871 MIPS -9%
Eluktronics RP-15 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4711 MIPS -12%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	4629 MIPS -14%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	4629 MIPS -14%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Eluktronics RP-15 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	53883 MIPS +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	47455 MIPS +20%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (29844 - 49562, n=31)	43117 MIPS +9%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H	39599 MIPS
Dell Precision 5540 Intel Core i9-9980HK	39566 MIPS 0%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	38363 MIPS -3%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Intel Core i7-10750H	34101 MIPS -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Intel Core i7-9850H	32268 MIPS -19%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	28826 MIPS -27%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	28826 MIPS -27%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	24388 MIPS -38%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1401 Points +6%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H	1323 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1233 - 1371, n=29)	1304 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	1289 Points -3%
Eluktronics RP-15 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1207 Points -9%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Intel Core i7-10750H	1200 Points -9%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	1183 Points -11%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Eluktronics RP-15 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	8672 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	8416 Points 0%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H	8393 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5715 - 8620, n=29)	7734 Points -8%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	7189 Points -14%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Intel Core i7-10750H	5911 Points -30%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	4399 Points -48%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Eluktronics RP-15 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	14.1 fps +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	12.5 fps +20%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (7.27 - 14.1, n=27)	11.7 fps +13%
Dell Precision 5540 Intel Core i9-9980HK	10.8 fps +4%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H	10.4 fps
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	10.1 fps -3%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Intel Core i7-10750H	9.38 fps -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Intel Core i7-9850H	9 fps -13%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	7.8 fps -25%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	7.76 fps -25%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	7.28 fps -30%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	63.6 s * -48%
Eluktronics RP-15 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	60.7 s * -41%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Intel Core i7-10750H	60.7 s * -41%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	54.8 s * -27%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (30.2 - 84.3, n=30)	50.3 s * -17%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	47.15 s * -10%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H	43 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Intel Core i5-10300H	0.646 sec * -10%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Intel Core i7-10750H	0.639 sec * -8%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H	0.589 sec *
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	0.586 sec * +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	0.582 sec * +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (0.546 - 0.662, n=29)	0.582 sec * +1%
Eluktronics RP-15 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.574 sec * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1519 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

224 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

203 Points

Yardım

... kıyaslama

Sistem performansı

PCMark kıyaslamaları, geçen yılki Precision 5540'ın sadece birkaç yüzde puanı dahilinde, günlük yüklerde benzer şekilde performans gösterdiklerini gösteriyor.

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	5754 Points +6%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB	5442 Points
Dell Precision 5540 Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, SK hynix PC400 512 GB	5296 Points -3%
MSI WP65 Quadro P620, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5025 Points -8%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4884 Points -10%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	4558 Points -16%
Essentials
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB	9826 Points
MSI WP65 Quadro P620, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	9815 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	9603 Points -2%
Dell Precision 5540 Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, SK hynix PC400 512 GB	9580 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	8890 Points -10%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	8802 Points -10%
Productivity
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	7796 Points +2%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB	7668 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	7657 Points 0%
MSI WP65 Quadro P620, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	7587 Points -1%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	7467 Points -3%
Dell Precision 5540 Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, SK hynix PC400 512 GB	7060 Points -8%
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	7033 Points +21%
Dell Precision 5540 Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, SK hynix PC400 512 GB	5960 Points +3%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB	5805 Points
MSI WP65 Quadro P620, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4624 Points -20%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4563 Points -21%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	3912 Points -33%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI WP65 Quadro P620, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4165 Points +12%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	4024 Points +8%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB	3729 Points
Dell Precision 5540 Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, SK hynix PC400 512 GB	3684 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	3654 Points -2%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	5341 Points +18%
MSI WP65 Quadro P620, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5213 Points +15%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4638 Points +3%
Dell Precision 5540 Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, SK hynix PC400 512 GB	4558 Points +1%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB	4515 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3729 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4515 puan
PCMark 10 Score		5442 puan
Yardım

DPC Gecikmesi

LatencyMon, test birimimizde DPC gecikme sorunu olmadığını ve YouTube'da 4K UHD video oynatma işleminin test sırasında kare atlamadan sorunsuz olduğunu ortaya koyuyor.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB	9856 μs * -3131%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)	3375 μs * -1007%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1521 μs * -399%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	858 μs * -181%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	716 μs * -135%
Eluktronics RP-15 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PM81000GPMQCN28BTF-E12S4 M.2 NVM SSD	515 μs * -69%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB	305 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Depolama aygıtları

Ünitemiz, daha yaygın olan PC601'in aksine 1 TB SK Hynix PC601A NVMe SSD ile birlikte gelir. CrystalDiskMark sonuçları, geçen yılki Alienware m15 R2'de bulunan RAID 0'da 512 GB PC601'de kaydettiklerimize yakın. Optimum koşullar altında maksimum 3400 MB / sn disk okumasına ulaşabiliyoruz.

Open secondary M.2 PCIe slot for another SSD

	Dell Precision 5550 P91F SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB	Dell Precision 5540 SK hynix PC400 512 GB	Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	MSI WP65 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
AS SSD		-14%	10%	4%	8%
Seq Read	2039	1743 -15%	1982 -3%	2973 46%	1097 -46%
Seq Write	1376	930 -32%	2252 64%	2429 77%	1838 34%
4K Read	44.11	39.1 -11%	47.13 7%	24.7 -44%	52.9 20%
4K Write	113.3	92.1 -19%	88.2 -22%	115.3 2%	108.4 -4%
4K-64 Read	1094	956 -13%	1481 35%	1243 14%	1509 38%
4K-64 Write	1630	863 -47%	1842 13%	835 -49%	1695 4%
Access Time Read *	0.059	0.074 -25%	0.087 -47%		0.067 -14%
Access Time Write *	0.99	0.053 95%	0.04 96%	0.034 97%	0.103 90%
Score Read	1342	1170 -13%	1726 29%	1565 17%	1671 25%
Score Write	1881	1048 -44%	2155 15%	1193 -37%	1988 6%
Score Total	3883	2781 -28%	4781 23%	3525 -9%	4558 17%
Copy ISO MB/s	2489		1982 -20%	2136 -14%	1800 -28%
Copy Program MB/s	682		501 -27%	489.6 -28%	569 -17%
Copy Game MB/s	1515		1140 -25%	1163 -23%	1409 -7%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-18%	14%	-3%	5%
Write 4K	122.6	98 -20%	132.9 8%	113.2 -8%	126.9 4%
Read 4K	42.4	41.25 -3%	46.73 10%	31.1 -27%	44.91 6%
Write Seq	2167	1295 -40%	2214 2%	2540 17%	1944 -10%
Read Seq	1747	1441 -18%	2018 16%	2005 15%	1449 -17%
Write 4K Q32T1	388.8	429.2 10%	478.9 23%	331.4 -15%	531 37%
Read 4K Q32T1	367.3	400.1 9%	540 47%	368.3 0%	579 58%
Write Seq Q32T1	2629	1366 -48%	2975 13%	2535 -4%	1970 -25%
Read Seq Q32T1	3460	2201 -36%	3195 -8%	3427 -1%	2990 -14%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-16% / -16%	12% / 11%	1% / 1%	7% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3460 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2629 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 367.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 388.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1747 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2167 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 42.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 122.6 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU Performansı

Quadro T2000 Max-Q, 3DMark'tan SpecViewPerf'e kadar neredeyse tüm kıyaslamalarda normal Quadro T1000 ile neredeyse aynı şekilde performans gösterir. İlginç bir şekilde, performans söz konusu iş yüküne bağlı olarak eski Quadro P2000'den daha hızlı veya daha yavaş olacaktır.

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9850H	116912 Points +194%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H	71388 Points +79%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H	64768 Points +63%
Eluktronics RP-15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	63158 Points +59%
Dell Precision 7540 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK	62730 Points +58%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H	58292 Points +46%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16 AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, i9-9880H	56273 Points +41%
Dell Precision 5540 NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK	42409 Points +7%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H	39803 Points
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H	34971 Points -12%
MSI WP65 NVIDIA Quadro P620, i7-9750H	31073 Points -22%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel UHD Graphics 630, i7-8750H	11199 Points -72%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H	19924 Points +137%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H	19821 Points +136%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9850H	18247 Points +117%
Eluktronics RP-15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	16808 Points +100%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H	9930 Points +18%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H	8727 Points +4%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H	8416 Points
Dell Precision 5540 NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK	8107 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16 AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, i9-9880H	7745 Points -8%
MSI WP65 NVIDIA Quadro P620, i7-9750H	4745 Points -44%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel UHD Graphics 630, i7-8750H	1326 Points -84%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H	7459 Points +139%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H	7153 Points +129%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9850H	6999 Points +124%
Eluktronics RP-15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	6280 Points +101%
Dell Precision 7540 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK	5589 Points +79%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H	3601 Points +15%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H	3261 Points +4%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H	3122 Points
Dell Precision 5540 NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK	3066 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16 AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, i9-9880H	2198 Points -30%
MSI WP65 NVIDIA Quadro P620, i7-9750H	1383 Points -56%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel UHD Graphics 630, i7-8750H	406 Points -87%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H	27607 Points +141%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H	26465 Points +131%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9850H	24156 Points +111%
Eluktronics RP-15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	22629 Points +98%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H	12865 Points +12%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H	12132 Points +6%
Dell Precision 5540 NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK	11468 Points 0%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H	11454 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16 AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, i9-9880H	10569 Points -8%
MSI WP65 NVIDIA Quadro P620, i7-9750H	5909 Points -48%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel UHD Graphics 630, i7-8750H	1805 Points -84%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eluktronics RP-15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	13824 Points +21%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H	13027 Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9850H	12707 Points +11%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H	11927 Points +4%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H	11416 Points
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H	11410 Points 0%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H	11239 Points -2%
Dell Precision 5540 NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK	10098 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16 AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, i9-9880H	10004 Points -12%
MSI WP65 NVIDIA Quadro P620, i7-9750H	6289 Points -45%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel UHD Graphics 630, i7-8750H	1875 Points -84%

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark 11 Performance		12119 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		21582 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7767 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score		3348 puan
Yardım

... kıyaslama

SPECviewperf 12 | SPECviewperf 13

SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	184.2 fps +96%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	102.1 fps +9%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	94 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (93.7 - 94, n=2)	93.9 fps 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	71.9 fps -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	26.05 fps -72%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	133.7 fps +45%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	97.4 fps +6%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	93 fps +1%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	92 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (88.9 - 92, n=2)	90.5 fps -2%
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	70.8 fps -23%
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	55.1 fps -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	34.14 fps -63%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	122.7 fps +37%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	99.1 fps +11%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	89.6 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (88.3 - 89.6, n=2)	89 fps -1%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	83.9 fps -6%
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	65.2 fps -27%
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	60.3 fps -33%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	36.59 fps -59%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	14.4 fps +128%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	9.99 fps +58%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	7.9 fps +25%
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (6.31 - 7.79, n=2)	7.05 fps +12%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	6.31 fps
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	5.62 fps -11%
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	3.93 fps -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	0.75 fps -88%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	92.7 fps +84%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	65.1 fps +29%
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	60.3 fps +20%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	58.5 fps +16%
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (50.4 - 51, n=2)	50.7 fps +1%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	50.4 fps
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	40.93 fps -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	25.04 fps -50%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	66.4 fps +132%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	41.02 fps +44%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	34.8 fps +22%
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (28.6 - 35.5, n=2)	32.1 fps +12%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	28.57 fps
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	23.11 fps -19%
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	14.65 fps -49%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	13.48 fps -53%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	96.9 fps +127%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	67.8 fps +59%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	42.75 fps
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	40.3 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (37.8 - 42.8, n=2)	40.3 fps -6%
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	30.42 fps -29%
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	25.23 fps -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	14.63 fps -66%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	152.9 fps +105%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	90.5 fps +21%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	82.7 fps +11%
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (74.5 - 74.6, n=2)	74.6 fps 0%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	74.5 fps
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	67.6 fps -9%
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	50.3 fps -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	26.98 fps -64%
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	135.9 fps +45%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	113.8 fps +21%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	108.6 fps +16%
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	104 fps +11%
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (94 - 100.8, n=2)	97.4 fps +4%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	94 fps
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	78.7 fps -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	54.2 fps -42%

SPECviewperf 13
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	180.9 fps +103%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	120.3 fps +35%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	101.9 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (88.9 - 93.3, n=2)	91.1 fps +2%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	88.9 fps
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	71.7 fps -19%
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	56.7 fps -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	25.17 fps -72%
Catia (catia-05)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	225 fps +56%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	166.9 fps +16%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	143.9 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (134.6 - 143.9, n=2)	139.3 fps -3%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	138.3 fps -4%
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	104 fps -28%
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	78.4 fps -46%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	47.78 fps -67%
Creo (creo-02)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	231.9 fps +99%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	151.8 fps +30%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	116.8 fps
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	116.3 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (109.6 - 116.8, n=2)	113.2 fps -3%
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	82.1 fps -30%
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	68 fps -42%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	36.25 fps -69%
Energy (energy-02)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	36.9 fps +136%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	25.94 fps +66%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	17.8 fps +14%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	15.66 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (14.9 - 15.7, n=2)	15.3 fps -2%
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	7.29 fps -53%
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	5.28 fps -66%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	0.83 fps -95%
Maya (maya-05)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	214.3 fps +94%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	146.4 fps +33%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	114.6 fps +4%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	110.2 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (105.7 - 110.2, n=2)	108 fps -2%
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	89.3 fps -19%
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	68.8 fps -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	40.74 fps -63%
Medical (medical-02)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	99.1 fps +106%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	67.1 fps +40%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	50.1 fps +4%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	48.02 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (41.7 - 48, n=2)	44.9 fps -6%
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	18.47 fps -62%
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	13.05 fps -73%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	9.85 fps -79%
Showcase (showcase-02)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	97.2 fps +129%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	67.8 fps +60%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	42.39 fps
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	40.2 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (37.6 - 42.4, n=2)	40 fps -6%
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	30.26 fps -29%
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	25.23 fps -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	14.56 fps -66%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	292.9 fps +110%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	179.4 fps +29%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	148.4 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (139.4 - 143.8, n=2)	141.6 fps +2%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	139.4 fps
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	121.9 fps -13%
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	90.4 fps -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	49.42 fps -65%
Solidworks (sw-04)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	138.3 fps +33%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	110.8 fps +7%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	104.4 fps 0%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	103.9 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (97.2 - 103.9, n=2)	100.6 fps -3%
Fujitsu Celsius H780 Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P2000	96.1 fps -8%
MSI WP65 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro P620	79.8 fps -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA Quadro P520	56.4 fps -46%

Dell Precision 5550 P91F Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB: Ø59.8 (56-64)

	düşük	orta	yüksek	ultra	QHD	4K
The Witcher 3 (2015)	181	107.6	62.5	33.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	153	140	130	118		47.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	91	48.5	36.8		25.7	13.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	91.9	76	64.8			47.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	101	56	48	42
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018)	71	53	45	25
Apex Legends (2019)	144	86.4	72.7	64.9
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	83	58	55	50
Metro Exodus (2019)	91.5	41.74	31.2	24.6
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)	271	86.1	69.9	40.3
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)	148.4	60.3	36.3	24.4
Control (2019)	120.2	40.4	28.3
Borderlands 3 (2019)	123.4	56	35.8	27.3
GRID 2019 (2019)	179	94.7	77.7	51
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019)		64.2	53.1	47
Hunt Showdown (2020)	141.3	50.3	44.5
Doom Eternal (2020)	147.4	85.5	58.1
Gears Tactics (2020)	263.3	77.5	47.6	35.1
F1 2020 (2020)	182	96	78	55

Emisyonlar

Sistem Gürültüsü

Web'de gezinirken veya kelime işlem yaparken sessiz olsa da, daha yüksek yükler, oyun dizüstü bilgisayarlarına daha çok benzeyen 40 dB (A) ila 50 dB (A) aralığında çok daha yüksek bir fan gürültüsüne neden olur. İş yükleriniz için en iyi olanı bulmak için Dell Power Manager yazılımı aracılığıyla fan ve performans ayarlarıyla uğraşmak isteyeceksiniz.

Twin ~45 mm fans. We can notice no electronic noise or coil whine from our test unit

Almost always silent during low processing loads

We recommend becoming familiar with Dell Power Manager as its settings directly affect fan noise and behavior

Fan noise profile (White: Background, Red: System idle, Blue: 3DMark 06, Orange: Witcher 3, Green: Maximum stress)

	Dell Precision 5550 P91F Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB	Dell Precision 5540 Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, SK hynix PC400 512 GB	Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	MSI WP65 Quadro P620, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Noise		2%	-11%	-7%	3%	-15%
off / environment *	26.2	28.6 -9%	30.1 -15%	31.2 -19%	28.3 -8%	28.7 -10%
Idle Minimum *	26.2	28.6 -9%	30.1 -15%	31.2 -19%	28.3 -8%	33.4 -27%
Idle Average *	26.2	28.6 -9%	30.1 -15%	31.2 -19%	28.3 -8%	33.5 -28%
Idle Maximum *	26.2	28.6 -9%	30.1 -15%	31.5 -20%	28.3 -8%	33.5 -28%
Load Average *	39.2	33.3 15%	42.3 -8%	38.4 2%	29.8 24%	37 6%
Witcher 3 ultra *	39	34.7 11%	48.2 -24%	36.9 5%	38.3 2%	38.7 1%
Load Maximum *	50.6	38 25%	42.1 17%	41.2 19%	38.3 24%	59.5 -18%

* ... smaller is better

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta		26.2 / 26.2 / 26.2 dB
Çalışırken		39.2 / 50.6 dB

	30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 26.2 dB(A)

Sıcaklık

Yüzey sıcaklığı gelişimi büyük ölçüde simetriktir ve yüksek işlem stresi altındayken klavye merkezinde 47 C'yi aşan sıcak noktalar. Sonuçlar, klavyenin 53 C'nin üzerine çıkabildiği Acer ConceptD 3 Pro'da gözlemlediğimizden daha soğuk.

AC adapter after running demanding loads for over an hour

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


34.8 °C	47 °C	34 °C
39.2 °C	46 °C	37.8 °C
32.2 °C	29 °C	29.6 °C

Maksimum: 47 °C
Ortalama: 36.6 °C


34 °C	44 °C	36.4 °C
34 °C	40.6 °C	36.2 °C
32 °C	33.8 °C	33.8 °C

Maksimum: 44 °C
Ortalama: 36.1 °C

Güç kaynağı 46 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


27.4 °C	29.4 °C	27.2 °C
27.2 °C	29.2 °C	28.2 °C
25.8 °C	24.6 °C	25 °C

Maksimum: 29.4 °C
Ortalama: 27.1 °C


29.4 °C	31 °C	30 °C
29 °C	29.8 °C	28.6 °C
27.6 °C	27.8 °C	27.4 °C

Maksimum: 31 °C
Ortalama: 29 °C

Oda sıcaklığı 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


31.8 °C	47 °C	36 °C
36.8 °C	43.8 °C	38.2 °C
30 °C	27.6 °C	27.8 °C

Maksimum: 47 °C
Ortalama: 35.4 °C


33.6 °C	44.8 °C	35.4 °C
33.8 °C	40.2 °C	35 °C
31.8 °C	33.8 °C	33 °C

Maksimum: 44.8 °C
Ortalama: 35.7 °C

Güç kaynağı 44 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-4.4 °C / -8 F).

Stres testi

Saat hızı davranışını gözlemlemek için Prime95'i çalıştırırken, CPU, 100 C'lik bir çekirdek sıcaklığa ulaşana kadar ilk birkaç saniye 4.2 GHz'e yükselir. Daha sonra, saat hızları sonraki dakika veya daha önce 3.4 ila 3.5 GHz aralığına düşer. Nihayet 2,8 ila 2,9 GHz aralığında ve 75 C çekirdek sıcaklığında stabilize oluyor. Maksimum Prime95 ve FurMark stresi altındayken, CPU sonunda sadece 1,2 GHz'e düşecek ve bu da kullanıcıların daha muhtemel olduğu bir iş istasyonunda görmek hayal kırıklığı yaratıyor. elde edebilecekleri en yüksek performansı istiyorlar. Pil gücüyle çalışmak grafik performansını sınırlayacaktır. Akülerle yapılan bir Yangın Saldırısı, ana şebekede 15535 ve 8416 puanla karşılaştırıldığında, sırasıyla 20806 ve 6475 puanlık Fizik ve Grafik puanlarını döndürecektir. Pil üzerindeki daha yüksek CPU numaraları, testten önceki daha soğuk bir CPU durumunun sonucudur.

Prime95+FurMark stress. note the huge dip in CPU performance and core temperature

	CPU Clock (GHz)	GPU Clock (MHz)	Average CPU Temperature (°C)	Average GPU Temperature (°C)
System Idle	--	--	48	48
Prime95 Stress	2.8 - 2.9	--	74	63
Prime95 + FurMark Stress	~1.1 - 1.2	~1065	64	64
Witcher 3 Stress	~3.7	1440	~66	67

Speakers

Audio is above average for a workstation since the Precision 5550 is derived from a consumer chassis that specializes in audio and visual quality. The system retains the 8 W speaker setup of the original XPS 15 9500 for strong audio playback.

Pink noise at maximum volume. Audio is well-balanced considering the thin size and workstation category

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Dell Precision 5550 P91F audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Running 3DMark 06 consumes an average of 114 W not unlike what we recorded on the XPS 15 9500, but power consumption when gaming is lower at 77 W compared to 93 W on the XPS 15. The difference is likely attributed to the Quadro GPU which runs at slower clock rates than the GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and isn't optimized for gaming.

We're able to record a temporary maximum consumption of 134.2 W from the small-medium 135 W AC adapter (~14.3 x 6.5 x 2.2 cm) as shown by our graphs below. Note that this is the exact same USB-C AC adapter that also ships with the XPS 15, XPS 17, and Precision 5750.

Prime95 initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would spike to 134 W for a few seconds before falling and stabilizing at 87 W

Prime95+FurMark initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would spike to 134 W for just over a minute before falling to 99 W and then stabilizing at 115 W

Anlık tüketim

Kapalı / Bekleme modu	0.14 / 1.8 Watt
Boşta	5.6 / 11.2 / 18.4 Watt
Çalışırken	114 / 134.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Dell Precision 5550 P91F i7-10875H, Quadro T2000 Max-Q, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.60	Dell Precision 5540 i9-9980HK, Quadro T2000 Max-Q, SK hynix PC400 512 GB, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60	Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 i7-10875H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60	Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 i7-9750H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE i7-9850H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI WP65 i7-9750H, Quadro P620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption		-2%	-59%	31%	-27%	-4%
Idle Minimum *	5.6	7.4 -32%	13.4 -139%	2.9 48%	7.9 -41%	5.6 -0%
Idle Average *	11.2	12.1 -8%	18 -61%	5.5 51%	11.8 -5%	8.6 23%
Idle Maximum *	18.4	12.7 31%	26.1 -42%	10.6 42%	14.9 19%	30.7 -67%
Load Average *	114	98 14%	115 -1%	86 25%	96 16%	78 32%
Witcher 3 ultra *	76.7	89.9 -17%	145 -89%	83 -8%	149 -94%	63.5 17%
Load Maximum *	134.2	135.1 -1%	165 -23%	100.7 25%	207.8 -55%	170.2 -27%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

Battery capacity has dropped from 97 Wh on last year's Precision 5540 to 86 Wh on our newer model. Runtimes, however, are longer at about 9 hours of real-world WLAN use to be very close to what we observed on the XPS 15 9500.

Charging from empty to full capacity takes about 2 hours. Any of the three USB-C ports can be used for recharging purposes.

Batarya ömrü

Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)		22h 34min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 00min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)		1h 22min

	Dell Precision 5550 P91F i7-10875H, Quadro T2000 Max-Q, 86 Wh	Dell Precision 5540 i9-9980HK, Quadro T2000 Max-Q, 97 Wh	Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 i7-10875H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, 80 Wh	Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 i7-9750H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 58.7 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE i7-9850H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, 90 Wh	MSI WP65 i7-9750H, Quadro P620, 51 Wh
Battery Runtime		-8%	-18%	-10%	33%	-48%
Reader / Idle	1354	897 -34%	527 -61%			605 -55%
WiFi v1.3	540	461 -15%	341 -37%	484 -10%	664 23%	362 -33%
Load	82	102 24%	119 45%		117 43%	37 -55%

Artılar

+ özellikle sınıfı için şık ve taşınabilir

+ yüksek kaliteli 16:10 4K dokunmatik ekran

+ isteğe bağlı Xeon ve ECC desteği

+ hızlı SD kart okuyucu

+ çok büyük tıklama alanı

+ iyi ses kalitesi

+ uzun pil ömrü

Eksiler

- Quadro T2000 Max-Q'dan daha yüksek GPU seçeneği yok

- tıklama paneli tuşları geri bildirimde süngerimsi

- entegre USB-A, HDMI veya RJ-45 yok

- Aşırı yükler altında CPU kısma

- artık OLED seçeneği yok

- web kamerası kapağı yok

Verdict

In review: Dell Precision 5550 P91F. Test unit provided by Dell US

Diğer ultra ince ve hafif Studio dizüstü bilgisayarların çoğu gibi, Precision 5550 de ham performansı ve bağlantı noktası seçeneklerinden çok taşınabilir form faktörü, şık tasarımı ve etkileyici parlak dokunmatik ekranı ile değerlendirilmelidir. Bu, zayıf bir sistem olduğu anlamına gelmez, ancak bu çekici Ultrabook görünümü için kaçınılmaz olarak bazı üst düzey grafik seçeneklerinden ödün vermek zorunda kalacaksınız.

Çok fazla hareket etmeyi planlamıyorsanız veya alanı karşılayabiliyorsanız, daha büyük olan Precision 7550, Precision 5550'den çok daha uzun bacaklara ve daha iyi performans seçeneklerine sahip olacaktır. Bu makine, yolcular ve hibrit iş istasyonu-Ultrabook için daha fazla üretilmiştir. sabit bir çözümden çok, bir seferde saatlerce yüksek yükler çalıştırmak anlamına geliyordu.

Bugün piyasadaki çoğu iş istasyonundan daha küçük, daha ince ve daha hafif. Dell Precision 5550, seyahat dostu bir tasarım için daha yüksek grafik seçeneklerinden ve bağlantı noktası çeşitliliğinden ödün verir.

Dell Precision 5550 P91F - 2020-08-05 08/05/2020 v7
Allen Ngo

İşcilik

86 / 98 → 88%

Klavye

89%

Mouse

94%

Bağlanılabilirlik

67 / 80 → 83%

Ağırlık

63 / 10-66 → 95%

Batarya

85 / 95 → 90%

Görüntü

83%

Oyun performansı

85%

Uygulama performansı

90%

Isınma

88 / 95 → 92%

Ses

85 / 90 → 94%

Audio

91%

Camera

41 / 85 → 48%

Ortalama

81%

86%

Workstation - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5191 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Translator: Aslinur Sarica - Translator - 155 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Dell Precision 5550 İş İstasyonu İncelemesi: Profesyoneller İçin XPS 15

Allen Ngo, 2020-08-30 (Update: 2020-08-30)

Dell Precision 5550 İş İstasyonu İncelemesi: Profesyoneller İçin XPS 15

Durum

Bağlantı

SD Kart Okuyucu

İletişim

Web kamerası

Bakım

Aksesuarlar ve Garanti

Giriş cihazları

Görüntüle

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Verim

İşlemci

Sistem performansı

DPC Gecikmesi

Depolama aygıtları

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

GPU Performansı

Emisyonlar

Sistem Gürültüsü

Sıcaklık

Stres testi

Speakers

Dell Precision 5550 P91F audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Battery Life

Artılar

Eksiler

Verdict

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare