Notebookcheck

Kısa inceleme: Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Laptop

Andreas Osthoff, J. Simon Leitner, 07/21/2018

Live Review: Handbrake Deluxe. Apple, nihayet MAcBook Pro 15 modelini yeni Intel işlemcilerle donatıyor. 6 çekirdekli işlemciler ile çoklu çekirdek performansı farkediliyor şekilde artıyor. En azından teoride böyle, çünkü önceki nesil ile kıyaslandığında fark her daim beklenilen kadar değil.

No, or more than one (0) Rating for the given SpecsID 294200 found

Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
İşlemci
Intel Core i7-8850H
Grafik kartı
AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Bellek
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2400, soldered, up to 32 GB
Görüntü
15.4 inç 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 221 PPI, APPA040, IPS, TrueTone, parlak: evet
Anakart
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Harddisk
Apple SSD AP0512, 512 GB 
Bağlantılar
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 4 Thunderbolt, 4 DisplayPort, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm stereo jack, Brightness Sensor
Network
Broadcom 802.11ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 15.5 x 349.3 x 240.7
Batarya
83 Wh Lithium-Polymer
İşletim sistemi
Apple macOS 10.13 High Sierra
Camera
Webcam: 720p FaceTime HD camera
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: Stereo, Klavye: Chiclet, Butterfly, Klavye ışığı: evet, 87-Watt USB-C PSU, 12 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
1.83 kg, Güç kaynağı: 369 g
Fiyat
3299 Euro
Bağlantılar

 

Size Comparison

479
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
520
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 533 cd/m² Ortalama: 492 cd/m² Minimum: 4.7 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 88 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 524 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1333:1 (Siyah: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.18
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
APPA040, , 2880x1800, 15.4
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
APPA031, , 2880x1800, 15.4
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
LQ156D1, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-6%
-36%
63%
66%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43.2 (20.4, 22.8)
48 (23.6, 24.4)
-11%
46.4 (22.8, 23.6)
-7%
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
61%
13.6 (7.6, 6)
69%
Response Time Black / White *
31.2 (16.4, 14.8)
33.8 (19.6, 14.2)
-8%
32 (18, 14)
-3%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
64%
12 (7.6, 4.4)
62%
PWM Frequency
117000 (75, 150)
119000 (80, 210)
2%
980.4 (25)
-99%
Screen
-19%
-137%
-7%
-28%
Brightness middle
520
545
5%
494
-5%
313
-40%
304.3
-41%
Brightness
492
523
6%
457
-7%
300
-39%
293
-40%
Brightness Distribution
88
86
-2%
88
0%
78
-11%
80
-9%
Black Level *
0.39
0.44
-13%
0.34
13%
0.33
15%
0.38
3%
Contrast
1333
1239
-7%
1453
9%
948
-29%
801
-40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.2
1.6
-33%
5.2
-333%
1.29
-8%
1.79
-49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.3
3.8
-65%
17.5
-661%
2.04
11%
3.69
-60%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.3
1.9
-46%
2.7
-108%
0.69
47%
1.1
15%
Gamma
2.18 110%
2.26 106%
2.1 114%
2.43 99%
2.27 106%
CCT
6738 96%
6834 95%
7038 92%
6550 99%
6665 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
71.2
60
59.8
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98.8
94
92.8
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-13% / -16%
-87% / -109%
28% / 7%
19% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 22.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Alienware 15 R4
Intel Core i9-8950HK
197 Points ∼100% +11%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Core i9-8950HK
191 Points ∼97% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-8850H
  (176 - 182, n=5)
179 Points ∼91% +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
177 Points ∼90%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼89% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼89% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼89% -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
172 Points ∼87% -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Intel Core i7-6920HQ (Windows)
163 Points ∼83% -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Intel Core i7-6920HQ (OS-X)
156 Points ∼79% -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Win10)
159.95 Points ∼81% -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (OS X)
156 Points ∼79% -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ (Win 10)
154 Points ∼78% -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points ∼72% -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 191, n=318)
122 Points ∼62% -31%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8750H (Undervolting)
1251 Points ∼100% +18%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8750H
1215 Points ∼97% +14%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
1154 Points ∼92% +8%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1133 Points ∼91% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8850H
  (953 - 1276, n=6)
1103 Points ∼88% +4%
Alienware 15 R4
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1083 Points ∼87% +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1074 Points ∼86% +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H (macOS Software Update)
1064 Points ∼85%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H (macOS)
953 Points ∼76% -10%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H
915 Points ∼73% -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Intel Core i7-6920HQ (OS-X)
740 Points ∼59% -30%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Intel Core i7-6920HQ (Windows)
729 Points ∼58% -31%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (OS X)
732 (min: 729, max: 733) Points ∼59% -31%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Win10)
726.78 (min: 704.77, max: 731.97) Points ∼58% -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ (Win 10)
704 Points ∼56% -34%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (macOS)
666 Points ∼53% -37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (73 - 1550, n=327)
438 Points ∼35% -59%
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220Tooltip
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit macOS Software Update: Ø1006 (962.51-1065.02)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit macOS: Ø832 (773-940)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) Intel Core i7-7700HQ Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit OS X: Ø731 (729-733)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) Intel Core i7-7700HQ Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit Win10: Ø724 (704.77-731.97)
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Intel Core i5-8300H Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø812 (765.87-840.02)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit Undervolting: Ø1168 (1123.47-1219.85)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1012 (980.27-1215.12)
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.5 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
98.44 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1064 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
177 Points
Yardım
Maksimum yük
 43.1 °C45.7 °C43.7 °C 
 37.6 °C43.4 °C37.1 °C 
 32.7 °C31.6 °C32.3 °C 
Maksimum: 45.7 °C
Ortalama: 38.6 °C
41.4 °C41.7 °C41.4 °C
36.6 °C38.8 °C38.3 °C
32.2 °C33.8 °C32.9 °C
Maksimum: 41.7 °C
Ortalama: 37.5 °C
Güç kaynağı  57.1 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.9 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
In review: Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018
In review: Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018

Bu yılın güncellemesi tamamen performans odaklı. Nihayet 32 GB desteği ve yeni 6 çekirdekli Intel işlemciler karşımızda. Yeni model eskisine göre daha hızlı ama işlemcinin tam performansını özellikle yoğun kullanım esnasında almak mümkün değil. Bunun sebebi soğutma çözümünün yeterince güçlü olmaması ve Apple'ın sistem sesi artmasın diye fan hızını arttırmamasından kaynaklı.

Bu söylediklerimiz çok fazla işlemci performansına ihtiyaç duymayan kullanıcılar için farketmeyecektir. Ama performans arayan kullanıcılar, özellikle Core i9 işlemci isteyenler, ilk test sonuçlarımıza göre hayal kırıklığına uğrayacaklar gibi. 

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Kısa inceleme: Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Laptop
Andreas Osthoff, J. Simon Leitner, 2018-07-21 (Update: 2018-07-21)