Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarXiaomi Redmi Note 8T İnceleme - Küçük fark ile akıllı telefon
Comparison Devices
Bewertung | Rating Version | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79.3 % | 7 | 01/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T SD 665, Adreno 610 | 200 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.30" | 2340x1080 | |
| 80.2 % | 7 | 01/2020 | TCL Plex SD 675, Adreno 612 | 192 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.53" | 2340x1080 | |
| 78.4 % | 7 | 12/2019 | Motorola Moto G8 Plus SD 665, Adreno 610 | 188 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.30" | 2280x1080 | |
| 79.8 % | 7 | 03/2019 | Samsung Galaxy A50 Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3 | 166 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2340x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| TCL Plex | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| TCL Plex | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aydınlatma: 93 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 628 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1163:1 (Siyah: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T IPS, 2340x1080, 6.30 | TCL Plex IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53 | Motorola Moto G8 Plus IPS, 2280x1080, 6.30 | Samsung Galaxy A50 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 11% | 36% | 85% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 56 ? | 56 ? -0% | 36 ? 36% | 8 ? 86% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 36.8 ? | 29.2 ? 21% | 24 ? 35% | 6 ? 84% |
| PWM Frequency | 2358 ? | 463 ? | 119 | |
| Screen | -19% | -42% | -13% | |
| Brightness middle | 628 | 432 -31% | 597 -5% | 644 3% |
| Brightness | 631 | 418 -34% | 596 -6% | 628 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 93 0% | 93 0% | 91 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.54 | 0.43 20% | 0.52 4% | |
| Contrast | 1163 | 1005 -14% | 1148 -1% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2 | 3.4 -70% | 5.93 -197% | 2.64 -32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.1 | 6 -18% | 9.42 -85% | 9.23 -81% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 3.8 -3% | 5.3 -43% | 2.5 32% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.14 103% | 2.232 99% | 2.024 109% |
| CCT | 6230 104% | 6151 106% | 7632 85% | 6649 98% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-13% | -3% /
-26% | 36% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
| TCL Plex | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.2 - 15, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
| TCL Plex | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7.8 - 8.4, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
| TCL Plex | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (3.9 - 9.1, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 105, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
| TCL Plex | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2.7 - 2.8, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | TCL Plex | Motorola Moto G8 Plus | Samsung Galaxy A50 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 30% | 4% | 3% | -16% | 322% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 315.8 | 522 65% | 302.5 -4% | 507 61% | 273 ? -14% | 1505 ? 377% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 173.9 | 199.7 15% | 217.4 25% | 192.1 10% | 176.8 ? 2% | 1112 ? 539% |
| Random Read 4KB | 90.4 | 130.8 45% | 59.9 -34% | 98.9 9% | 59.1 ? -35% | 247 ? 173% |
| Random Write 4KB | 91.2 | 130.1 43% | 124.9 37% | 18.2 -80% | 31.7 ? -65% | 271 ? 197% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 71.6 ? | 74.9 ? 5% | 72.6 ? 1% | 73.9 ? 3% | 77.4 ? 8% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 52.8 ? | 56.2 ? 6% | 52.2 ? -1% | 60.7 ? 15% | 58.3 ? 10% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A50 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T 4000 mAh | TCL Plex 3820 mAh | Motorola Moto G8 Plus 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 764 | 616 -19% | 980 28% | 701 -8% | 912 ? 19% |
Artılar
Eksiler
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
-
01/21/2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt
Pricecompare
