Notebookcheck

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T İnceleme - Küçük fark ile akıllı telefon

Jolly good. Redmi Note 8'in kardeş modelini batı pazarları için test ediyoruz. Ekipman nominal olarak aynıdır, ancak NFC'ye ek olarak, müşteriyi memnun etmek için başka uyarlamalar da vardır. Ancak akıllı telefonun bagajında hoş olmayan bir sürpriz de var.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt,
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T (Redmi Note Seri)
İşlemci
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260
Grafik kartı
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Bellek
4096 MB 
Görüntü
6.3 inç 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, parlak: evet, 60 Hz
Harddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 56 GB Boş
Bağlantılar
1 USB 2.0, Ses çıkışları: 3.5mm, Kart okuyucular: microSD bis zu 256 GB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: Proximity sensor, Ambient light sensor, Acceleration sensor, Gyroscope, Digital Compass
Network
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1,800 and 1,900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (bands 1, 2, 4, 5 and 8), LTE (bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38 and 40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 8.6 x 161.15 x 75.4
Batarya
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
İşletim sistemi
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (1/2.0", 0.8 µm, f/1.75, 79.4°) + 8 MPix (ultra wide angle, 1.12 µm, f/2.2, 120°) + 2 MPix (macro, 1.75 µm, f/2.4) + 2 MPix (depth optics, 1.75 µm, f/2.4), Camera2 API level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (1.12 µm, f/2.0), 1.080p-Video
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: Mono, Klavye: Virtual, Power supply (5V-3A/9V-2A/12V-1.5A), USB cable, SIM tool, protective cover, documentation, MiUI 10, 12 Ay Garanti, DRM Widevine L1, FM radio, IR blaster, head SAR: 0.74 W/kg, body SAR: 1.30 W/kg, fanless
Ağırlık
200 g
Fiyat
249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Bewertung
Rating Version
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
79 %7
01/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
SD 665, Adreno 610
200 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
80 %7
01/2020
TCL Plex
SD 675, Adreno 612
192 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.53"2340x1080
78 %7
12/2019
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
SD 665, Adreno 610
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2280x1080
80 %7
03/2019
Samsung Galaxy A50
Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3
166 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2340x1080

Boyut Karşılaştırma

162.2 mm 76.56 mm 7.99 mm 192 g161.15 mm 75.4 mm 8.6 mm 200 g158.4 mm 75.8 mm 9.1 mm 188 g158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
TCL Plex
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
359 (min: 330, max: 369) MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
315 (min: 157, max: 352) MBit/s ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼82% -7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
182 (min: 11, max: 259) MBit/s ∼51% -42%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
TCL Plex
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
287 (min: 250, max: 308) MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
278 (min: 218, max: 305) MBit/s ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼95% -2%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
152 (min: 1, max: 254) MBit/s ∼53% -45%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø315 (157-352)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø278 (218-305)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker
26.1 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
34.9 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
55.9 ∆E
45.3 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
31 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
56.5 ∆E
57.3 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
63.1 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
65 ∆E
63.1 ∆E
46.5 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T: 39.96 ∆E min: 12.57 - max: 64.96 ∆E
ColorChecker
14.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
12 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
11 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T: 7.54 ∆E min: 1.85 - max: 14.87 ∆E
Testchart @ 1 Lux
Selfie with Redmi Note 8T
631
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
653
cd/m²
628
cd/m²
628
cd/m²
646
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
608
cd/m²
621
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 653 cd/m² Ortalama: 631.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.09 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 93 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 628 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1163:1 (Siyah: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
TCL Plex
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Response Times
11%
36%
85%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
56 (27.2, 28.8)
56 (29.2, 26.8)
-0%
36 (17, 19)
36%
8 (5, 3)
86%
Response Time Black / White *
36.8 (20.4, 16.4)
29.2 (12.8, 16.4)
21%
24 (9, 15)
35%
6 (3, 3)
84%
PWM Frequency
2358 (49)
463 (20)
119
Screen
-19%
-42%
-13%
Brightness middle
628
432
-31%
597
-5%
644
3%
Brightness
631
418
-34%
596
-6%
628
0%
Brightness Distribution
93
93
0%
93
0%
91
-2%
Black Level *
0.54
0.43
20%
0.52
4%
Contrast
1163
1005
-14%
1148
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2
3.4
-70%
5.93
-197%
2.64
-32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.1
6
-18%
9.42
-85%
9.23
-81%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.7
3.8
-3%
5.3
-43%
2.5
32%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.14 103%
2.232 99%
2.024 109%
CCT
6230 104%
6151 106%
7632 85%
6649 98%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / -13%
-3% / -26%
36% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27.2 ms rise
↘ 28.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18037 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Redmi Note 8T - Outdoor
Viewing Angles
Geekbench 5
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1392 Points ∼76%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
939 Points ∼52% -33%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1379 Points ∼76% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1327 - 1392, n=3)
1366 Points ∼75% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=65)
1821 Points ∼100% +31%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
313 Points ∼60%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
492 Points ∼95% +57%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
315 Points ∼61% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (313 - 315, n=3)
314 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=65)
519 Points ∼100% +66%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6587 Points ∼83%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7950 Points ∼100% +21%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6534 Points ∼82% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼73% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6396 - 6969, n=8)
6711 Points ∼84% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=483)
5784 Points ∼73% -12%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8186 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7446 - 9051, n=9)
8251 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=643)
6333 Points ∼77%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2410 Points ∼100%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1684 Points ∼70% -30%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2341 Points ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2154 - 2488, n=10)
2339 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5766, n=491)
2155 Points ∼89% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
990 Points ∼49%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
955 Points ∼47% -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
981 Points ∼48% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼58% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (980 - 999, n=10)
988 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=491)
2038 Points ∼100% +106%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1139 Points ∼60%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1057 Points ∼56% -7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1126 Points ∼59% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼70% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1097 - 1151, n=10)
1130 Points ∼60% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=492)
1893 Points ∼100% +66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2399 Points ∼100%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1657 Points ∼69% -31%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2393 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2199 - 2493, n=10)
2346 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5721, n=521)
2066 Points ∼86% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1663 Points ∼61%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1611 Points ∼59% -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1670 Points ∼62% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼57% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1653 - 1692, n=10)
1669 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=521)
2712 Points ∼100% +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1785 Points ∼78%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1621 Points ∼71% -9%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1790 Points ∼78% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼73% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1765 - 1810, n=10)
1785 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=521)
2282 Points ∼100% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2468 Points ∼100%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1724 Points ∼70% -30%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2424 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2246 - 2493, n=10)
2405 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=571)
2044 Points ∼83% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
927 Points ∼54%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
829 Points ∼49% -11%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
979 Points ∼57% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼67% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (927 - 999, n=10)
967 Points ∼57% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=571)
1705 Points ∼100% +84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1076 Points ∼66%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
937 Points ∼57% -13%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1128 Points ∼69% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼80% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1076 - 1152, n=10)
1118 Points ∼69% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7305, n=572)
1630 Points ∼100% +51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2412 Points ∼98%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1708 Points ∼70% -29%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2452 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼99% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2282 - 2507, n=10)
2407 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=613)
1908 Points ∼78% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1616 Points ∼72%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1594 Points ∼71% -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1634 Points ∼73% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼57% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1564 - 1663, n=10)
1616 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=612)
2234 Points ∼100% +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1744 Points ∼90%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1618 Points ∼84% -7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1765 Points ∼92% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼74% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1675 - 1795, n=10)
1742 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=615)
1928 Points ∼100% +11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19349 Points ∼93%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
15461 Points ∼75% -20%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18698 Points ∼90% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼69% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (17865 - 24652, n=10)
20700 Points ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 57583, n=761)
15165 Points ∼73% -22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24871 Points ∼94%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
26320 Points ∼100% +6%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24992 Points ∼95% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼63% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15403 - 25219, n=10)
23857 Points ∼91% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=759)
25420 Points ∼97% +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23388 Points ∼99%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
22767 Points ∼96% -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23253 Points ∼98% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼68% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (22445 - 25046, n=10)
23721 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 110468, n=759)
20080 Points ∼85% -14%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.4 fps ∼40%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
4.9 fps ∼45% +11%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps ∼41% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼45% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (4 - 9.1, n=10)
5.79 fps ∼53% +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=283)
11 fps ∼100% +150%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼35%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
3 fps ∼38% +7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼35% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼39% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.7 - 2.8, n=10)
2.78 fps ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=281)
7.97 fps ∼100% +185%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.4 fps ∼45%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8.3 fps ∼51% +12%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps ∼46% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼50% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.2 - 15, n=10)
9.48 fps ∼58% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=287)
16.4 fps ∼100% +122%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps ∼43%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
9.1 fps ∼48% +12%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.2 fps ∼43% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼47% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7.8 - 8.4, n=10)
8.11 fps ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=286)
19 fps ∼100% +135%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8TTCL PlexMotorola Moto G8 PlusSamsung Galaxy A50Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
30%
4%
3%
-18%
-23%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
52.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
56.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
52.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15%
57.6 (11.2 - 74.7, n=121)
9%
50.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=504)
-4%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
71.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
74.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
72.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
76.6 (21.1 - 87.2, n=121)
7%
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=504)
-4%
Random Write 4KB
91.15
130.11
43%
124.9
37%
18.2
-80%
27 (3.4 - 133, n=138)
-70%
32.5 (0.14 - 319, n=850)
-64%
Random Read 4KB
90.38
130.75
45%
59.9
-34%
98.9
9%
56.3 (11.4 - 149, n=138)
-38%
56.4 (1.59 - 324, n=850)
-38%
Sequential Write 256KB
173.95
199.74
15%
217.4
25%
192.1
10%
174 (40 - 254, n=138)
0%
119 (2.99 - 911, n=850)
-32%
Sequential Read 256KB
315.75
522.31
65%
302.5
-4%
507.3
61%
274 (95.6 - 704, n=138)
-13%
324 (12.1 - 1802, n=850)
3%
Maksimum yük
 32.4 °C32.6 °C32.5 °C 
 32.5 °C32 °C32.8 °C 
 31.9 °C32.3 °C31.9 °C 
Maksimum: 32.8 °C
Ortalama: 32.3 °C
30.1 °C30.4 °C32.6 °C
30.2 °C30.5 °C33.3 °C
29.8 °C30.7 °C31.9 °C
Maksimum: 33.3 °C
Ortalama: 31.1 °C
Güç kaynağı  27 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.440253026.43126.726.64027.724.55037.635.76328.831.6802428.710021.226.212521.532.916021.147.220016.249.525018.753.63151661.44001663.650014.566.463014.668.380014.467.7100015.671.4125015.371.9160014.673200014.675.1250014.577.5315014.779.2400014.680.3500014.578.5630014.575800014.7741000015.174.61250015.168.31600015.155SPL27.187.9N0.970.7median 15.1median 68.3Delta1.41042.246.742.143.934.636.737.342.739.84532.736.427.729.327.83125.734.323.340.22344.221.449.221.455.720.161.620.563.421.869.520.472.12074.618.273.918.972.9187419.174.518.276.71871.21968.21872.418.17518.166.418.252.318.148.365.965.66267.731.38518.518.514.623.11.662.7median 19.1median 68.21.811.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 8TSamsung Galaxy A50
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
4000 mAh
TCL Plex
3820 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
764
616
-19%
980
28%
701
-8%
689 (223 - 2636, n=718)
-10%
Batarya ömrü
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 78)
12h 44min

Artılar

+ fast SoC
+ good IPS panel
+ well-rounded equipment package

Eksiler

- Camera quality needs for optimization
- higher SAR values

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T - 01/21/2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt

İşcilik
84%
Klavye
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
91%
Bağlanılabilirlik
49 / 70 → 69%
Ağırlık
88%
Batarya
90%
Görüntü
88%
Oyun performansı
15 / 64 → 23%
Uygulama performansı
64 / 86 → 74%
Isınma
94%
Ses
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
60%
Ortalama
74%
79%
Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T İnceleme - Küçük fark ile akıllı telefon
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-01-28 (Update: 2020-01-28)