Notebookcheck

Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA Ryzen 7 Convertible İncelemesi: Core i7 Uygulanmasına Gerek Yok

Flippin' good. Bu AMD destekli dönüştürülebilir perakendeciler, piyasadaki birçok Intel Core i7 alternatifinden hem daha hızlı hem de daha ucuz olduğu için uygun fiyatlı Asus VivoBook Flip serisi için bir başka ev koşusu.
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo,

Bu yılın başlarında tanıtılan Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420 dönüştürülebilir, geçen yılki VivoBook Flip 14 TP410 serisinin halefidir. Bu son model, cüzdanınızda bir delik açmadan eskisinden daha şık ve daha hızlı olması için hem yepyeni bir kasa tasarımı hem de en yeni Zen 2 U serisi CPU'ları sunar. Asus, VivoBook serisini daha pahalı olan üst düzey ZenBook serisinin aksine, bütçe bilincine sahip ev kullanıcılarına pazarlıyor. Buradaki yapılandırmamız Ryzen 7 4700U CPU, 8 GB RAM, 512 GB GB NVMe SSD ve 1080p dokunmatik ekranla yaklaşık 700 $ karşılığında geliyor AMERİKAN DOLARI. Daha ucuz Ryzen 5 4500U ve Ryzen 3 4300U SKU'ları da mevcutken, Intel Tiger Lake sürümleri 2020'nin 4. çeyreğinde piyasaya sürülecek. Rakipler arasında Lenovo IdeaPad Flex, HP Pavilion x360 veya Dell Inspiron 2-in- gibi diğer uygun fiyatlı subnotebook dönüştürücüler yer alıyor. 1. Daha fazla Asus incelemesi: Asus ZenBook 13 UX325Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15Asus TUF A15Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17Asus Chromebook Flip

Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA (VivoBook Flip 14 Seri)
İşlemci
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U 8 x 2 - 4.1 GHz, Renoir (Zen 2)
Grafik kartı
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 - 512 MB, Çekirdek: 1600 MHz, Bellek: 1333 MHz, DDR4, 19.40.44.03
Bellek
8192 MB 
, 4 GB soldered + Samsung 4 GB DDR4-3200, 22-22-22-52, Dual-Channel
Görüntü
14 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, 10-point capacitive, native pen support, BOE NV140FHM-N49, IPS, BOE07F7, parlak: evet, 60 Hz
Anakart
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Harddisk
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU, 512 GB 
Ses kartı
AMD Raven/Renoir/VanGogh/Cezanne - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Bağlantılar
3 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm combo, Kart okuyucular: MicroSD
Network
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 18.2 x 324 x 220
Batarya
42 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 3-cell
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: Stereo, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, Radeon Settings Lite, 12 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
1.562 kg, Güç kaynağı: 147 g
Fiyat
700 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81 %
08/2020
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
R7 4700U, Vega 7
1.6 kg18.2 mm14"1920x1080
84 %
03/2020
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620
1.4 kg16.9 mm14"1920x1080
87 %
03/2020
Honor Magicbook 14
R5 3500U, Vega 8
1.4 kg16 mm14"1920x1080
85 %
09/2020
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
R3 4300U, Vega 5
1.2 kg16.55 mm14"1920x1080
83 %
07/2020
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
i5-1035G1, GeForce MX350
1.7 kg17.9 mm15.6"1920x1080
81 %
LG Gram 14T90N
i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620
1.2 kg18 mm14"1920x1080

Durum

Eski VivoBook Flip 14 TP410 ile karşılaştırıldığında, TM420 her boyutta daha küçüktür ve aynı ağırlıktadır. Hem taban hem de kapak serttir ve bir HP Envy x360'tan biraz daha zayıftır.

Chassis and lid are made of aluminum alloy to feel almost like a ZenBook. Corners and edges are sharper this time around when compared to the last gen model
Chassis and lid are made of aluminum alloy to feel almost like a ZenBook. Corners and edges are sharper this time around when compared to the last gen model
The 360-degree hinges feel firm and uniform at all angles with no teetering when typing
The 360-degree hinges feel firm and uniform at all angles with no teetering when typing
Base becomes slightly angled when the lid is open
Base becomes slightly angled when the lid is open
Smooth matte aluminum surfaces attract fingerprints
Smooth matte aluminum surfaces attract fingerprints
Tablet mode is useful, but still much heavier than an ordinary tablet or detachable
Tablet mode is useful, but still much heavier than an ordinary tablet or detachable
Ventilation grilles occupy most of the left edge
Ventilation grilles occupy most of the left edge
327.1 mm 241 mm 19.9 mm 1.6 kg327.4 mm 226.5 mm 19 mm 1.6 kg324 mm 220 mm 18.2 mm 1.6 kg323.4 mm 218.9 mm 16.55 mm 1.2 kg323 mm 218 mm 15.5 mm 1.3 kg320 mm 206 mm 18 mm 1.4 kg

Bağlantı

Geçen yılki VivoBook Flip TP410'da üç USB-A bağlantı noktası ve tam boyutlu bir SD okuyucu ile karşılaştırıldığında artık iki USB-A bağlantı noktası ve bir MicroSD kart okuyucu var. USB-C bağlantı noktasının DisplayPort'u desteklemediğini unutmayın.

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: Power button, MicroSD reader, 3.5 mm combo audio, USB 3.2 Gen. 2 Type-C, USB 3.2 Gen. 2 Type-A, HDMI, AC adapter
Right: Power button, MicroSD reader, 3.5 mm combo audio, USB 3.2 Gen. 2 Type-C, USB 3.2 Gen. 2 Type-A, HDMI, AC adapter
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: Kensington Lock, USB 2.0 Type-A
Left: Kensington Lock, USB 2.0 Type-A

SD Kart Okuyucu

Fully inserted MicroSD card sits almost flush against the edge. Transfer rates are slow at about 36 MB/s
Fully inserted MicroSD card sits almost flush against the edge. Transfer rates are slow at about 36 MB/s
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
36.3 MB/s ∼100%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
26.7 MB/s ∼74% -26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19.3 MB/s ∼53% -47%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
37.2 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
31.9 MB/s ∼86% -14%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
27.5 MB/s ∼74% -26%

İletişim

Removable M.2 WLAN module. We experienced no connectivity issues when paired to our Netgear RAX200 router
Removable M.2 WLAN module. We experienced no connectivity issues when paired to our Netgear RAX200 router
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1096 (min: 1062, max: 1130) MBit/s ∼100% +86%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
898 (min: 695, max: 935) MBit/s ∼82% +53%
Honor Magicbook 14
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
685 (min: 640, max: 694) MBit/s ∼63% +16%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
588 (min: 456, max: 634) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1203 (min: 1102, max: 1276) MBit/s ∼100% +180%
Honor Magicbook 14
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
646 (min: 583, max: 663) MBit/s ∼54% +50%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
615 (min: 580, max: 641) MBit/s ∼51% +43%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
430 (min: 364, max: 477) MBit/s ∼36%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø588 (456-634)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø430 (364-477)

Web kamerası

ColorChecker
8.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
14 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
10 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
13 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA: 10.12 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 13.98 ∆E

Bakım

Alt panel, kolay çıkarılması için 10 Philips vida ile sabitlenmiştir. M.2 SSD, M.2 WLAN ve 1x SODIMM yuvasına erişilebilir. 4 GB RAM'in lehimlendiğini unutmayın.

Aksesuarlar ve Garanti

Kutu, normal AC adaptörüne ve evrak işlerine ek olarak aktif bir dijital kalem içerir. Standart bir yıllık sınırlı garanti geçerlidir.

Giriş cihazları

Klavye ve Dokunmatik Yüzey

Unlike on last year's TP410, the TM410 has an extra column of keys along the right edge of the keyboard
Unlike on last year's TP410, the TM410 has an extra column of keys along the right edge of the keyboard
Backlit keys are 1.4 mm in travel with moderate clatter. Feedback could have been stronger
Backlit keys are 1.4 mm in travel with moderate clatter. Feedback could have been stronger
Small Precision clickpad (10 x 6 cm) offers smooth glide and minimal sticking when moving slowly. However, its integrated mouse keys are shallow and spongy
Small Precision clickpad (10 x 6 cm) offers smooth glide and minimal sticking when moving slowly. However, its integrated mouse keys are shallow and spongy
Cramped and spongy arrow keys. The Enter key is colored to distinguish the latest VivoBook from other models
Cramped and spongy arrow keys. The Enter key is colored to distinguish the latest VivoBook from other models

Görüntüle

Kasa ve iç kısımlar yeni olsa da, Asus hala eski VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA'da bulunan BOE NV140FHM-N49 dokunmatik ekran panelini kullanıyor, yani görsel deneyim yıldan yıla aynı kalıyor. Bu IPS paneli, sınırlı renkleri, ortalama yanıt süreleri ve bir bütçe ekranını temsil eden ortalama kontrast oranıyla dikkat çekiyor.

Bottom bezel is relatively thick
Bottom bezel is relatively thick
Narrow side bezels
Narrow side bezels
Sharp subpixels for sharp texts and images
Sharp subpixels for sharp texts and images
Minimal uneven backlight bleeding
Minimal uneven backlight bleeding
240.5
cd/m²
264.4
cd/m²
267.1
cd/m²
242.3
cd/m²
272.5
cd/m²
268.5
cd/m²
241.1
cd/m²
274.8
cd/m²
266.2
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
BOE NV140FHM-N49
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 274.8 cd/m² Ortalama: 259.7 cd/m² Minimum: 15.78 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 88 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 272.5 cd/m²
Kontrast: 649:1 (Siyah: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.65 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 4.34
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6
59.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 38.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
BOE NV140FHM-N49, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00
LP140WF9-SPE1, IPS LED, 14, 1920x1080
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
LG Philips LP140WFA-SPD1, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AU Optronics B140HAN04.0, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
AU AUO323D, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Honor Magicbook 14
BOE CQ TV140FHM-NH1, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Response Times
-14%
7%
-4%
5%
-18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36.4 (18.8, 17.6)
52 (24.4, 27.6)
-43%
39 (21, 18)
-7%
42 (20, 22)
-15%
36 (18, 18)
1%
44.8 (24.4, 20.4)
-23%
Response Time Black / White *
30.4 (18.8, 11.6)
25.6 (12.4, 13.2)
16%
24 (14, 10)
21%
28 (16, 12)
8%
28 (16, 12)
8%
34 (19.2, 14.8)
-12%
PWM Frequency
5952 (99)
Screen
52%
-4%
13%
34%
26%
Brightness middle
272.5
409
50%
292
7%
256
-6%
280
3%
311
14%
Brightness
260
405
56%
260
0%
237
-9%
286
10%
296
14%
Brightness Distribution
88
95
8%
80
-9%
81
-8%
78
-11%
92
5%
Black Level *
0.42
0.21
50%
0.36
14%
0.17
60%
0.208
50%
0.18
57%
Contrast
649
1948
200%
811
25%
1506
132%
1346
107%
1728
166%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.65
4.9
-5%
6.92
-49%
5.43
-17%
3.97
15%
5.3
-14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
17.78
8.4
53%
19.36
-9%
19.73
-11%
8.29
53%
18.5
-4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.34
1.3
70%
5.13
-18%
4.8
-11%
3.42
21%
4.2
3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.4
5.8
-32%
3.94
10%
3.29
25%
2.83
36%
3.5
20%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.53 87%
2.83 78%
2.52 87%
2.34 94%
2.1 105%
CCT
6984 93%
7009 93%
6737 96%
6840 95%
6556 99%
7078 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38.4
60.7
58%
36
-6%
36
-6%
56
46%
42.5
11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59.8
95.3
59%
56
-6%
57
-5%
85
42%
65.8
10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
19% / 42%
2% / -2%
5% / 11%
20% / 29%
4% / 19%

* ... smaller is better

Renk alanı, çoğu pahalı Ultrabook'larda> yüzde 90'a kıyasla sRGB'nin yalnızca yüzde 60'ı kadar dardır. Daha doğru renkler için, bunun yerine üst düzey ZenBook serisine bakmanızı öneririz.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Ortalama gri tonlamalı DeltaE, ekranı kendimiz kalibre ettikten sonra 4,4'ten sadece 0,9'a yükselir. Bununla birlikte, yukarıda bahsedilen dar renk alanı nedeniyle renkler yaklaşık olarak aynı kalır.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 17.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

The display is not bright enough to overcome the glossy overlay and bright ambient lighting when outdoors. Expect a lot of glare even when set to the maximum brightness setting. Remember to disable AMD Vari-Bright or else maximum brightness will automatically drop to just 154 nits when running on battery power.

Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under sunlight
Wide IPS viewing angles. Contrast begins to degrade if viewing from extreme angles
Wide IPS viewing angles. Contrast begins to degrade if viewing from extreme angles

Performance

 

Processor

CPU performance is faster than any Intel Comet Lake-U or Ice Lake-powered laptop at the moment. Performance over time dips by about 20 percent as shown by our CineBench R15 xT loop test results below, but clock rates eventually recover and stabilize at the 1000-point range.

See our main page on the Ryzen 7 4700U for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.

CineBench R15
CineBench R15
CineBench R20
CineBench R20
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050Tooltip
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø996 (803.97-1049.04)
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø932 (907.83-1035.01)
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø568 (535.78-642.12)
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø627 (606.12-749.06)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) - CPU (Multi Core)
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
2829 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
  (2401 - 2829, n=6)
2649 Points ∼94% -6%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
2410 Points ∼85% -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
2401 Points ∼85% -15%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1590 Points ∼56% -44%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
1525 Points ∼54% -46%
Honor Magicbook 14
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
1492 Points ∼53% -47%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
1432 Points ∼51% -49%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA
Intel Core i5-8265U
1350 Points ∼48% -52%
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML
Intel Core i5-10210U
1292 Points ∼46% -54%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
Intel Core i7-8565U
1176 Points ∼42% -58%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) - CPU (Single Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
  (448 - 476, n=6)
464 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
461 Points ∼99%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
460 Points ∼99% 0%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9
Intel Core i7-1065G7
452 Points ∼97% -2%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
451 Points ∼97% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
447 Points ∼96% -3%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
427 Points ∼92% -7%
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML
Intel Core i5-10210U
421 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA
Intel Core i5-8265U
399 Points ∼86% -13%
Honor Magicbook 14
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
369 Points ∼80% -20%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
Intel Core i7-8565U
365 Points ∼79% -21%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit - CPU Multi 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
  (1035 - 1189, n=7)
1096 Points ∼100% +4%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
1051 Points ∼96% 0%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1049 (min: 803.97, max: 1049.04) Points ∼96%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
973 Points ∼89% -7%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9
Intel Core i7-1065G7
749 Points ∼68% -29%
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML
Intel Core i5-10210U
677 Points ∼62% -35%
Honor Magicbook 14
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
668 (min: 646.48, max: 668.95) Points ∼61% -36%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
642 (min: 535.78, max: 642.12) Points ∼59% -39%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA
Intel Core i5-8265U
622 Points ∼57% -41%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
Intel Core i7-8565U
581 Points ∼53% -45%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
580 Points ∼53% -45%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit - CPU Single 64Bit
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
182 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9
Intel Core i7-1065G7
181 Points ∼99% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
  (176 - 182, n=6)
181 Points ∼99% -1%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
180 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
177.6 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
174 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML
Intel Core i5-10210U
169 Points ∼93% -7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
165 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
Intel Core i7-8565U
153 Points ∼84% -16%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA
Intel Core i5-8265U
152 Points ∼84% -16%
Honor Magicbook 14
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
145 Points ∼80% -20%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU - BMW27 CPU
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
907 Seconds * ∼100% -103%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA
Intel Core i5-8265U
815 Seconds * ∼90% -82%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
781.8 Seconds * ∼86% -75%
Honor Magicbook 14
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
703 Seconds * ∼78% -57%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
593.4 Seconds * ∼65% -33%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
585 Seconds * ∼64% -31%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
  (447 - 537, n=4)
490 Seconds * ∼54% -10%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
447 Seconds * ∼49%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 - 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
4681 MIPS ∼100% +6%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
4425 MIPS ∼95% 0%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
4422 MIPS ∼94%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
  (4208 - 4470, n=4)
4348 MIPS ∼93% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
4288 MIPS ∼92% -3%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA
Intel Core i5-8265U
4029 MIPS ∼86% -9%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
4014 MIPS ∼86% -9%
Honor Magicbook 14
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
3555 MIPS ∼76% -20%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 - 7z b 4
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
31114 MIPS ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
  (26652 - 31114, n=4)
28945 MIPS ∼93% -7%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
27115 MIPS ∼87% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
23610 MIPS ∼76% -24%
Honor Magicbook 14
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
17508 MIPS ∼56% -44%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA
Intel Core i5-8265U
17467 MIPS ∼56% -44%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
16487 MIPS ∼53% -47%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
15043 MIPS ∼48% -52%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
1211 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1157 Points ∼96%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
  (1101 - 1159, n=4)
1132 Points ∼93% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
1098 Points ∼91% -5%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
1027 Points ∼85% -11%
Honor Magicbook 14
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
904 Points ∼75% -22%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
5443 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
  (4792 - 5869, n=4)
5239 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
4646 Points ∼85% -15%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
3721 Points ∼68% -32%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
3330 Points ∼61% -39%
Honor Magicbook 14
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
3154 Points ∼58% -42%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset - 4k Preset
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
8.81 fps ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
  (6.79 - 8.81, n=4)
8.02 fps ∼91% -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
6.72 fps ∼76% -24%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
6.032 fps ∼68% -32%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA
Intel Core i5-8265U
4.6 fps ∼52% -48%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
4.6 fps ∼52% -48%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
4.37 fps ∼50% -50%
Honor Magicbook 14
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
3.99 fps ∼45% -55%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF - 20 Documents To PDF
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
  (57 - 116, n=4)
72.4 s ∼100% +27%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
62.2 s ∼86% +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
58.19 s ∼80% +2%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
57 s ∼79%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
55.76 s ∼77% -2%
Honor Magicbook 14
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
0 s ∼0% -100%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean - Overall mean
Honor Magicbook 14
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
0.734 sec * ∼100% -20%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
0.686 sec * ∼93% -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
0.639 sec * ∼87% -5%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
0.638 sec * ∼87% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
  (0.611 - 0.651, n=4)
0.626 sec * ∼85% -2%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
0.611 sec * ∼83%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1049 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
67.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
182 Points
Yardım

System Performance

PCMark results are strong and consistently ahead of many 14-inch Intel Ice Lake or Comet lake-U Ultrabooks. We didn't experience any issues with our unit save for it being unable to wake from sleep one time that we weren't able to reliably reproduce.

PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
5161 Points ∼40%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
Vega 5, R3 4300U, SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0
3926 Points ∼30% -24%
Honor Magicbook 14
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3494 Points ∼27% -32%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
3257 Points ∼25% -37%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
2999 Points ∼23% -42%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G
2692 Points ∼21% -48%
Productivity
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
7945 Points ∼76%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
7207 Points ∼69% -9%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
6634 Points ∼64% -17%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
Vega 5, R3 4300U, SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0
6489 Points ∼62% -18%
Honor Magicbook 14
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
5931 Points ∼57% -25%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G
5384 Points ∼52% -32%
Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
9652 Points ∼84% +3%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
9385 Points ∼82%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
Vega 5, R3 4300U, SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0
8600 Points ∼75% -8%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
8011 Points ∼70% -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G
7666 Points ∼67% -18%
Honor Magicbook 14
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
7544 Points ∼66% -20%
Score
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
5214 Points ∼64%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
Vega 5, R3 4300U, SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0
4322 Points ∼53% -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4251 Points ∼52% -18%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
3995 Points ∼49% -23%
Honor Magicbook 14
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3862 Points ∼48% -26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G
3446 Points ∼42% -34%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
5260 Points ∼77%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5200 Points ∼76% -1%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
Vega 5, R3 4300U, SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0
5085 Points ∼75% -3%
Honor Magicbook 14
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
5039 Points ∼74% -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G
2610 Points ∼38% -50%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Honor Magicbook 14
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
4235 Points ∼70% +1%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
4208 Points ∼69%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4198 Points ∼69% 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
Vega 5, R3 4300U, SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0
3841 Points ∼63% -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G
3221 Points ∼53% -23%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4208 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5260 puan
Yardım

DPC Latency

LatencyMon shows DPC latency issues related to storport.sys. 4K60 playback on YouTube is otherwise smooth and with no dropped frames.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Honor Magicbook 14
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
1519.3 μs * ∼100% -158%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
Vega 5, R3 4300U, SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0
800.1 μs * ∼53% -36%
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G
674.1 μs * ∼44% -15%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
588.6 μs * ∼39%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
584.5 μs * ∼38% +1%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
573 μs * ∼38% +3%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
466 μs * ∼31% +21%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

The Samsung PM991 is a budget mid-range NVMe SSD that pairs well with the budget mid-range VivoBook. Its drawback is the relatively slow average sequential write rate of about 800 MB/s whereas pricier NVMe drives like the PM981a can be 2x to 3x faster.

See our table of HDDs and SSDs for more benchmark comparisons.

AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 5.5
CDM 5.5
M.2 2280 and SODIMM slots are protected in aluminum housing. Only one internal storage slot is available
M.2 2280 and SODIMM slots are protected in aluminum housing. Only one internal storage slot is available
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
Honor Magicbook 14
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
AS SSD
-15%
-11%
-22%
18%
Copy Game MB/s
828.68
546.02
-34%
391.55
-53%
Copy Program MB/s
374.34
253.05
-32%
226.5
-39%
Copy ISO MB/s
1211.69
753.9
-38%
691.96
-43%
Score Total
2474
1647
-33%
2118
-14%
1786
-28%
2168
-12%
Score Write
947
659
-30%
915
-3%
601
-37%
792
-16%
Score Read
1022
657
-36%
813
-20%
804
-21%
916
-10%
Access Time Write *
0.084
0.029
65%
0.035
58%
0.072
14%
0.034
60%
Access Time Read *
0.081
0.104
-28%
0.074
9%
0.075
7%
4K-64 Write
734.26
399.57
-46%
712.84
-3%
482.91
-34%
482.65
-34%
4K-64 Read
834.67
467.74
-44%
603.26
-28%
643.83
-23%
606.65
-27%
4K Write
134.63
138.31
3%
109.06
-19%
52.67
-61%
95.71
-29%
4K Read
48.08
35.93
-25%
41.53
-14%
26.65
-45%
50.01
4%
Seq Write
782.95
1215.35
55%
931.13
19%
652.81
-17%
2133
172%
Seq Read
1396.78
1535.04
10%
1682.2
20%
1336.41
-4%
2591
85%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
7%
-12%
-29%
34%
Write 4K
121.2
173.1
43%
96.28
-21%
54.61
-55%
137.66
14%
Read 4K
49.91
49.32
-1%
35.06
-30%
28.19
-44%
42.49
-15%
Write Seq
1090
1188
9%
1001
-8%
839.9
-23%
2340.76
115%
Read Seq
1533
1278
-17%
1072
-30%
905
-41%
2435.95
59%
Write 4K Q32T1
393.3
457.4
16%
423.9
8%
409.5
4%
260.96
-34%
Read 4K Q32T1
406
505.2
24%
464.7
14%
292.4
-28%
335.39
-17%
Write Seq Q32T1
1225
1258
3%
967.1
-21%
1038
-15%
2342.9
91%
Read Seq Q32T1
2277
1742
-23%
2179
-4%
1607
-29%
3568.5
57%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / -7%
-12% / -11%
-26% / -25%
26% / 25%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2277 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1225 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 406 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 393.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1533 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1090 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 49.91 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 121.2 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000201020202030204020502060207020802090210021102120213021402150216021702180219022002210222022302240225022602270Tooltip
: Ø2260 (2043.15-2268.62)

GPU Performance

According to 3DMark, the integrated Radeon RX Vega 7 performs as well as most laptops equipped with the 10 W GeForce MX150 while being about 10 to 15 percent faster than the Core i7-1065G7 and its integrated Iris Plus G7. Real-world gaming performance still favors the GeForce GPU due to its more mature drivers, but AMD has been steadily optimizing its drivers to narrow the gap.

See our dedicated page on the Radeon RX Vega 7 for more technical information and benchmarks.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Ice Storm Extreme
Ice Storm Extreme
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Time Spy
Time Spy
 
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i5-1035G1
1370 Points ∼100% +52%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
1163 Points ∼85% +29%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
  (742 - 1084, n=6)
946 Points ∼69% +5%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
903 Points ∼66%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
862 Points ∼63% -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000), R5 4500U
852 Points ∼62% -6%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
835 Points ∼61% -8%
HP 14-dk0008ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U
779 Points ∼57% -14%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Radeon RX Vega 5, R3 4300U
733 Points ∼54% -19%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1
453 Points ∼33% -50%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
402 Points ∼29% -55%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i5-1035G1
1522 Points ∼100% +48%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
1282 Points ∼84% +25%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
  (848 - 1244, n=7)
1083 Points ∼71% +5%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
1028 Points ∼68%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000), R5 4500U
967 Points ∼64% -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
961 Points ∼63% -7%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
945 Points ∼62% -8%
HP 14-dk0008ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U
863 Points ∼57% -16%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Radeon RX Vega 5, R3 4300U
825 Points ∼54% -20%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1
512 Points ∼34% -50%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
461 Points ∼30% -55%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i5-1035G1
4457 Points ∼100% +47%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
3819 Points ∼86% +26%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
3156 Points ∼71% +4%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
  (2425 - 3593, n=6)
3128 Points ∼70% +3%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
3036 Points ∼68%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000), R5 4500U
2876 Points ∼65% -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
2874 Points ∼64% -5%
HP 14-dk0008ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U
2581 Points ∼58% -15%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Radeon RX Vega 5, R3 4300U
2438 Points ∼55% -20%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1
1739 Points ∼39% -43%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i5-1035G1
5296 Points ∼100% +47%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
4546 Points ∼86% +26%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
4045 Points ∼76% +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000), R5 4500U
3767 Points ∼71% +5%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
3707 Points ∼70% +3%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
  (2567 - 4440, n=6)
3657 Points ∼69% +2%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
3601 Points ∼68%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Radeon RX Vega 5, R3 4300U
3288 Points ∼62% -9%
HP 14-dk0008ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U
2698 Points ∼51% -25%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1
2257 Points ∼43% -37%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
1800 Points ∼34% -50%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i5-1035G1
6448 Points ∼100% +31%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
4927 Points ∼76%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
  (4019 - 5422, n=6)
4908 Points ∼76% 0%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
4785 Points ∼74% -3%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
4613 Points ∼72% -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000), R5 4500U
4400 Points ∼68% -11%
HP 14-dk0008ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U
4056 Points ∼63% -18%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
3560 Points ∼55% -28%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
AMD Radeon RX Vega 5, R3 4300U
3535 Points ∼55% -28%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54T-501U
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1
2516 Points ∼39% -49%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
1979 Points ∼31% -60%
3DMark 11 Performance
5105 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
17487 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2760 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score
1028 puan
Yardım
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
30.2 fps ∼100%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
26.6 fps ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000)
25.4 (min: 19, max: 32) fps ∼84% -16%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
22.96 fps ∼76% -24%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
16.1 fps ∼53% -47%
HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
13.2 fps ∼44% -56%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE
Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
11.49 fps ∼38% -62%
010203040Tooltip
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU; FPS: Ø36.5 (31-39)
düşük orta yüksek ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 61.4 38.6 20.2 13.2 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 93.9 70.3 44.5 41.5 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 30.2 15.2 9.86 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 40.6 32.5 28.6 fps

Emissions

System Noise

Day-to-day loads like browsing or word processing will not induce any bothersome pulsing behavior. At most, we're able to record a high of just 31.7 dB(A) which is just barely audible in most environments. Higher loads like gaming will induce a fan noise of 41.3 dB(A) to be louder than most Ultrabooks with slower Intel UHD Graphics only.

Cooling solution consists of a single long heat pipe and a relatively large ~55 to ~60 mm fan
Cooling solution consists of a single long heat pipe and a relatively large ~55 to ~60 mm fan
Fan noise is quiet and not an issue during low to low-medium loads
Fan noise is quiet and not an issue during low to low-medium loads
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
Vega 5, R3 4300U, SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
Honor Magicbook 14
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
Noise
-4%
-5%
-1%
-2%
-12%
off / environment *
27.1
30.7
-13%
30.3
-12%
30.1
-11%
29.6
-9%
30.7
-13%
Idle Minimum *
27.1
30.7
-13%
30.3
-12%
30.1
-11%
29.6
-9%
31
-14%
Idle Average *
27.1
30.7
-13%
30.3
-12%
30.1
-11%
29.6
-9%
31
-14%
Idle Maximum *
27.1
30.7
-13%
30.3
-12%
30.1
-11%
29.6
-9%
31.3
-15%
Load Average *
35
31.6
10%
32.6
7%
30.1
14%
30.8
12%
43.4
-24%
Witcher 3 ultra *
41.3
42.8
-4%
Load Maximum *
41.3
33.6
19%
35.6
14%
32.02
22%
35.3
15%
41.5
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta
27.1 / 27.1 / 27.1 dB
Çalışırken
35 / 41.3 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
sessiz
40 dB(A)
duyulabilirlik
50 dB(A)
gürültülü
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm uzaklık)   environment noise: 27.1 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.833.636.736.836.62532.73231.932.7313125.126.825.424.225.64025.325.922.726.826.55023.525.92526.325.96324.432.831.732.826.38023.32421.62226.910023.723.522.222.124.312522.428.928.428.922.61602121.320.722.223.320023.129.12929.822.925024.321.620.519.62431522.522.119.319.623.440023.823.320.919.923.950025.922.318.117.42663026.222.215.714.826.580028.923.313.513.128.7100029.924.313.213.630.2125031.225.713.713.831160031.525.212.612.931.7200030.523.812.513.130.1250032.525.412.913.232.2315032.223.813.213.331.9400027.919.913.313.328500026.317.513.313.626.1630021.715.113.513.721.5800017.314.213.513.6171000016.314.413.313.615.51250016.214.313.113.4151600015.314.112.612.713.3SPL41.334.92727.141.2N3.42.1113.4median 24.3median 22.3median 13.5median 13.6median 24.3Delta3.92.32.93.63.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA

Temperature

Surface temperatures are noticeably warmer on the keyboard keys and along the left edge near the exhaust grilles as shown by our temperature maps below. The bottom panel can become quite warm at 43 C when under high processing loads partly because there are no ventilation grilles on the bottom panel.

Exhaust along left edge
Exhaust along left edge
AC adapter after running Witcher 3 for over an hour
AC adapter after running Witcher 3 for over an hour
Maksimum yük
 33.8 °C44.6 °C34.6 °C 
 44.2 °C41.2 °C37.2 °C 
 30 °C28.6 °C29.4 °C 
Maksimum: 44.6 °C
Ortalama: 36 °C
37.4 °C45 °C41.4 °C
35.6 °C46 °C44.6 °C
32.8 °C33.4 °C33.8 °C
Maksimum: 46 °C
Ortalama: 38.9 °C
Güç kaynağı  47 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.8 °C / -3.3 F).
System idle (top)
System idle (top)
System idle (bottom)
System idle (bottom)
Witcher 3 stress (top)
Witcher 3 stress (top)
Witcher 3 stress (bottom)
Witcher 3 stress (bottom)
Prime95+FurMark stress (top)
Prime95+FurMark stress (top)
Prime95+FurMark stress (bottom)
Prime95+FurMark stress (bottom)

Stress Test

Running Prime95 would boost CPU clock rates to 4.9 GHz for just a couple of seconds before stabilizing at 3.5 GHz and 76 C for a few minutes thereafter. Clock rates and temperature eventually settle at 3 GHz and 69 C, respectively. Faster stable clock rates may have been possible, but it would have likely caused skin temperatures or fan noise to be higher than what Asus was aiming for.

System Idle
System Idle
Witcher 3 stress
Witcher 3 stress
Prime95 stress
Prime95 stress
Prime95+FurMark stress stress
Prime95+FurMark stress stress
CPU Clock (GHz) GPU Clock (MHz) Average CPU Temperature (°C)
System Idle -- -- 37
Prime95 Stress 2.9 -- 69
Prime95 + FurMark Stress 2.0 - 2.8 550 - 860 65
Witcher 3 Stress 1.4 1462 61

Speakers

Pink noise at maximum volume. Audio quality isn't anything special, but it gets the job done
Pink noise at maximum volume. Audio quality isn't anything special, but it gets the job done
Stereo speakers located near front corners. Maximum volume causes the palm rests to vibrate slightly to the touch
Stereo speakers located near front corners. Maximum volume causes the palm rests to vibrate slightly to the touch
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.436.736.42531.731.931.73125.825.425.84025.522.725.55026.92526.96326.631.726.68031.121.631.110039.922.239.912545.428.445.416052.920.752.920056.22956.225059.320.559.331561.719.361.740064.220.964.250067.918.167.963064.815.764.880066.213.566.2100068.413.268.4125067.713.767.7160068.112.668.1200063.312.563.3250062.412.962.431506313.263400066.113.366.1500068.113.368.1630070.213.570.2800069.213.569.21000070.213.370.21250065.713.165.7160007012.670SPL79.22779.2N47.7147.7median 65.7median 13.5median 65.7Delta4.92.94.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IAApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energy Management

Power Consumption

The latest Ryzen laptops are able to offer higher performance-per-Watt than any Intel Core U-series laptop at the moment especially when it comes to processor performance. Running Witcher 3, for example, consumes about 30 percent more than the Core i7-1065G7-powered Asus ZenBook 13 while offering both 15 percent higher graphics performance and over 100 percent faster CPU multi-thread performance.

We're able to measure a temporary maximum consumption of 45 W from the small (~5.4 x 5.4 x 3 cm) 45 W AC adapter when running both Prime95 and FurMark simultaneously as shown by our graphs below. Consumption drops  since maximum boost clock rates are not sustainable over long periods.

Power consumption when running 3DMark 06
Power consumption when running 3DMark 06
Power consumption when running Witcher 3 on 1080p Ultra settings
Power consumption when running Witcher 3 on 1080p Ultra settings
Prime95 initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would spike to 45 W before steadily falling to 33.9 W
Prime95 initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would spike to 45 W before steadily falling to 33.9 W
Prime95+FurMark initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would spike to 45 W again before steadily falling to 33 W
Prime95+FurMark initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would spike to 45 W again before steadily falling to 33 W
Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.28 / 0.39 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 4 / 6.4 / 7 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 34.6 / 45.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
R7 4700U, Vega 7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
R3 4300U, Vega 5, SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Honor Magicbook 14
R5 3500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Power Consumption
4%
12%
-15%
-21%
-16%
Idle Minimum *
4
3.2
20%
3.7
7%
3.6
10%
5.2
-30%
2.4
40%
Idle Average *
6.4
6.2
3%
5.6
12%
7.5
-17%
7.7
-20%
4.2
34%
Idle Maximum *
7
7.2
-3%
7.8
-11%
9.4
-34%
9.3
-33%
7.8
-11%
Load Average *
34.6
30
13%
26.4
24%
42
-21%
40.3
-16%
57
-65%
Witcher 3 ultra *
35
52
-49%
Load Maximum *
45.1
50
-11%
31.4
30%
51
-13%
48
-6%
64
-42%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

Runtimes are longer than expected despite the relatively small 42 Wh battery. Our system would last for 8 hours when looping web pages to be just enough for a full day of use.

Charging from empty to full capacity takes about 1.5 hours. Unfortunately, the USB-C port cannot be used to recharge the system.

Batarya ömrü
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7h 59min
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
R7 4700U, Vega 7, 42 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05
i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 35 Wh
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
R3 4300U, Vega 5, 48.85 Wh
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Honor Magicbook 14
R5 3500U, Vega 8, 56 Wh
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh
Battery Runtime
-25%
51%
-4%
19%
7%
Reader / Idle
WiFi v1.3
479
359
-25%
724
51%
461
-4%
570
19%
514
7%
Load
100

Artılar

+ özellikle fiyat için hızlı CPU ve GPU performansı
+ yükseltilebilir M.2 depolama, WLAN, 1x SODIMM
+ düşük yükler sırasında sessiz fan gürültüsü
+ şık ZenBook benzeri tasarım
+ aktif ekran kalemi dahildir
+ dönüştürülebilir form faktörü

Eksiler

- USB-C ile şarj edilemiyor
- web kamerası deklanşörü veya IR yok
- ortalama kontrast oranı
- dar renk alanı
- süngerimsi tıklama alanı

Verdict

In review: Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA. Test unit provided by Asus
In review: Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA. Test unit provided by Asus

AMD destekli 2020 VivoBook Flip, daha iyi bir zamanda piyasaya sürülmüş olamaz. Intel'in 10. nesil Ice Lake ve Comet Lake-U platformları, ham performans açısından Zen 2 serisine karşı çoktan bayatlamış durumda ve AMD dizüstü bilgisayarların genel olarak daha düşük başlangıç ​​fiyatları, Core i7 alternatiflerini şu anda daha da çekici hale getiriyor. Intel, Tiger Lake piyasaya çıktığında bu yıl bir miktar kaybettiği ivmeyi yeniden kazanmaya hazırlanıyor, ancak VivoBook'umuz gibi AMD dizüstü bilgisayarlar o zamana kadar ücretsiz hüküm sürecek.

 

Dizüstü bilgisayarın kendisine gelince, kullanıcılar uygun fiyat noktasına rağmen performanstan hiç ödün vermeyecekler. Bunun yerine, donanım Thunderbolt 3, USB-C şarj, Wi-Fi 6 ve bir IR kamera gibi birkaç lüks özellikten yoksun olacak. En büyük kesik köşesi, ZenBook serisine kıyasla soluk olan ekran ve dar gamıdır. Aksi takdirde, bu öğrenciler, evde multimedya kullanımı ve ara sıra seyahatler için uygun, hızlı ve iyi oluşturulmuş bir bütçe dizüstü bilgisayardır.

 

Boyut kategorisinde diğerlerinden daha hızlı performans gösterebilen ve yüzlerce daha pahalıya mal olan ucuz bir dönüştürülebilir. Vasat ekran dışında neredeyse tüm cephelerde ortalamanın üzerinde.

Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA - 08/20/2020 v7
Allen Ngo

İşcilik
78 / 98 → 80%
Klavye
78%
Mouse
72%
Bağlanılabilirlik
51 / 75 → 68%
Ağırlık
68 / 20-75 → 88%
Batarya
80%
Görüntü
76%
Oyun performansı
64 / 78 → 82%