Notebookcheck

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra incelemesi - Güçlü özelliklere sahip akıllı telefon ve S Pen dahil

Let there be light! Note20 Ultra, özellikle ekranla çıtayı yükseltiyor, ancak aynı zamanda Galaxy S20 Ultra'da bulunan eski hataları da tekrarlıyor. Daha büyük bir batarya, yeni bir tasarım, geliştirilmiş bir kamera ve S Pen ile en güçlü Note modeli, alıcıların kalbini kazanmak istiyor. İncelememiz, bunun önünde herhangi bir engel olup olmadığını ortaya koyuyor.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger,

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra, Galaxy Note10'un doğrudan halefidir ve yalnızca Almanya'daki 5G sürümünde mevcuttur. 256 GB depolama alanı ile bu sürüm 1.266 Euro (~ 1.499 $) tutarındadır. Daha fazla depolama alanına ihtiyaç duyanlar, 512 GB modelini seçebilir, bu da sizi 1,364 Euro'ya (~ 1.615 $) geri getirecek. Samsung, selefine kıyasla çok fazla ince ayar yaptı ve özellikle kamera yükseltildi. Yeni ekran ayrıca daha iyi değerler vaat ediyor. Ek olarak, S Pen'in daha da geliştirildiği ve hepsinden önemlisi Note10 modellerine ve daha küçük Note20'ye göre daha kısa yanıt sürelerine sahip olduğu söyleniyor. Bununla birlikte, Avrupalılar için bir dezavantaj var çünkü Note20 Ultra, Exynos 990 ile birlikte geliyor, bu da diğer bölgelerde kullanılan Snapdragon 865'e kıyasla daha az performans ve pil ömrü anlamına geliyor. Ancak Samsung bunu daha da optimize etmek istiyor. Note10 ile vasat pil ömrü ve başlangıçta biraz yavaş olan WLAN, eleştirimizin odak noktasıydı. Aşağıdaki incelemede, Samsung'un Note20 Ultra ile bunu geliştirip geliştirmediğini ve bir yükseltmenin buna değip değmediğini öğreneceksiniz.

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Galaxy Note Seri)
İşlemci
Samsung Exynos 990 8 x 2 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M5 / Cortex A-76 / Cortex-A55
Grafik kartı
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
Bellek
12288 MB 
, LPDDR5
Görüntü
6.9 inç 19.3:9, 3088 x 1440 pixel 494 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, dynamic AMOLED, parlak: evet, HDR, 120 Hz
Harddisk
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 221.3 GB Boş
Bağlantılar
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ses çıkışları: USB Type-C, Kart okuyucular: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: position sensor, accelerometer, geomagnetic sensor, Hall sensor, proximity sensor, barometer, MST
Network
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1,800, and 1,900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA (B1 (2,100), B2 (1,900), B4 (AWS), B5 (850), B8 (900)), LTE (B1 (2,100), B2 (1,900), B3 (1,800), B4 (AWS), B5 (850), B7 (2,600), B8 (900), B12 (700), B13 (700), B17 (700), B18 (800), B19 (800), B20, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 8.1 x 164.8 x 77.2
Batarya
4500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
İşletim sistemi
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (1/1.33", f/1.8, OIS) + 12 MP (ultra-wide angle, 1/2.55", f/2.2) + 12 MP (5x optical zoom, f/3.0, 1/3.0", OIS), 8K video, Camera2 API level: Full
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.2, DPAF)
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: stereo speakers, Klavye: onscreen, power adapter, USB cable, SIM tool, headset, documentation, One UI, Microsoft apps, Spotify, 24 Ay Garanti, DRM Widevine L1, SAR (head): 0.338 W/kg, SAR (body): 1.470 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Ağırlık
208 g, Güç kaynağı: 69 g
Fiyat
1,266 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89 %
10/2020
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
208 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.9"3088x1440
87 %
09/2019
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12
196 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.8"3040x1440
89 %
12/2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
88 %
05/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
87 %
09/2019
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.5"2688x1242

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra, Mystic White, Mystic Black ve Mystic Bronze olarak mevcuttur. Selefi ile karşılaştırıldığında, 12 gram ağırlığındadır ve hem yüksekliği hem de uzunluğu artmıştır. Görsel olarak, büyük kamera modülü hemen göze çarpar; arkaya 2.45 milimetre çıkıntı yapıyor. Modül artık hem görsel hem de dokunsal olarak gerçek bir vurgu olan mat bir camla kaplandı - üzerinde parmak izleri hala görülebilir, ancak yansıtıcı bir cama sahip olmakla karşılaştırılamaz. Galaxy Note20 Ultra aynı zamanda ilk akıllı telefon. birçok testte kendini kanıtlamış olan yeni Gorilla Glass Victus'u kullanın. Bu haliyle işçilik mükemmel. Boşluk boyutları çok dar ve tüm kenarlar temiz bir şekilde buluşuyor. Dahası, akıllı telefonun uygulanan basınç veya bükülme girişimleriyle ilgili herhangi bir sorunu yok. SIM / SD kart tepsisinin kapağı, metal çerçevenin geri kalanıyla aynı renkte ve onunla aynı hizada. Tepsinin kendisi gri plastikten yapılmıştır ve ikinci SIM kart yerine iki nano SIM kartı veya bir microSD kartı tutabilir. Galaxy Note20 Ultra ayrıca IP68 standardına uygun olarak toz ve su girişine karşı korumalıdır.

Boyut karşılaştırması

164.8 mm 77.2 mm 8.1 mm 208 g162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g162.3 mm 77.2 mm 7.9 mm 196 g158.1 mm 73.1 mm 8.8 mm 198 g158 mm 77.8 mm 8.1 mm 226 g

Bağlantı - USB 3.2'ye sahip Samsung telefon

USB 3.2 adı nedeniyle USB bağlantı noktasıyla ilgili yeni özellikler veya daha fazla hız bekliyorsanız, Samsung sadece adlandırmayı ayarladığı için hayal kırıklığına uğrayacaksınız. Daha doğrusu, bu, HDMI veya DisplayPort girişlerine görüntü çıkışının yanı sıra 5 Gb / sn'ye kadar veri aktarımlarını destekleyen bir USB 3.2 Gen 1 bağlantı noktasıdır (önceden USB 3.1 Gen 1 ve ondan önce USB 3.0). Samsung DeX hala bir masaüstü sistemi olarak mevcuttur, ancak yine de harici bir ekranda 1080p ile sınırlıdır. Ancak görüntüyü bir DisplayPort bağlantısı üzerinden iletmek ve yalnızca akıllı telefonu yansıtmak istiyorsanız, bunu Ultra HD'de (60 FPS) de yapabilirsiniz. MicroSD yuvası, 1 TB'ye kadar depolama ortamını yönetebilir ve exFAT dosyasını destekler sistemi. Uygulamalar bu isteğe bağlı depolama alanında verileri kısmen depolayabilir, ancak oraya doğrudan yüklenemezler.Diğer arayüzler açısından, öncekine kıyasla hiçbir şey değişmedi. Note20 Ultra'da hem bir radyo alıcısı hem de bir IR blaster yok. Aynı şekilde ses jakı olmadan da yapmaya devam eden Samsung, kutuya uygun bir adaptör de dahil ediyor.

Top: SIM/SD card tray, microphone
Top: SIM/SD card tray, microphone
Left
Left
Right: Volume rocker, power/Bixby button
Right: Volume rocker, power/Bixby button
Bottom: Microphone, USB port, speaker, S Pen
Bottom: Microphone, USB port, speaker, S Pen

Yazılım - One UI 2.5 ve Android 10 ile Note20

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra, en son Android 10 ve şirket içi One UI 2.5 ile birlikte gelir. Korelilerin bu arada amiral gemisi akıllı telefonları için üç büyük güncelleme sözü verdikleri (bildirdiğimiz gibi) kesinlikle olumlu, böylece alıcılar Note20 Ultra'da Android 13'ü almayı bile bekleyebilir.Samsung, çok sayıda üçüncü taraf uygulamasını yeniden önceden yükledi. Bunlara Facebook, Netflix, Spotify ve Microsoft'tan çeşitli uygulamalar dahildir. Özellikle eğlence sağlayıcıları silinemez, sadece devre dışı bırakılır. Ek olarak, Akıllı Telefonum'un entegrasyonu da pratiktir; doğrudan kendi Windows bilgisayarınızda bildirim almanıza veya akıllı telefonunuzu ayrı bir pencereye yansıtmanıza ve sürükle ve bırak yoluyla veri alışverişine olanak tanır. Note20 Ultra ayrıca Xbox Game Pass Ultimate hizmetini destekler, böylece konsol başlıkları doğrudan buluttan akıllı telefona aktarılır.

İletişim ve GNSS - Wi-Fi 6 ve 5G özellikli Galaxy akıllı telefon

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra, Netgear Nighthawk AX12 referans yönlendiricimizle birlikte yüksek aktarım hızları sağlayan bir Wi-Fi 6 WLAN modülüne sahiptir. Veri alımı çok kararlıdır ve veri gönderirken veri hızları biraz dalgalanırken, yine de yüksek bir seviyede kalırlar. WLAN'ın menzili de testte ikna edicidir.Mobil bağlantılar açısından Note20 Ultra, tüm modern ve eski mobil radyo standartlarını kullanarak İnternet'e erişebilir. LTE Cat'e ek olarak. 20, 5G, geniş bir frekans kapsamı ile de mevcuttur. Ancak Snapdragon sürümlerinden farklı olarak, mmWave desteği burada mevcut değil. Hibrit SIM yuvası, biri 5G ağına bağlanabilen iki nano SIM kart barındırabilir. Hafıza kartıyla ikinci yuvayı kullanan kullanıcılar da entegre eSIM'den yararlanabilir.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (912min - 1092max) MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (468min - 602max) MBit/s ∼53% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
883 (834min - 919max) MBit/s ∼87% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
870 (841min - 882max) MBit/s ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
670 (326min - 802max) MBit/s ∼66% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
349 (310min - 384max) MBit/s ∼35% -60%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (550min - 597max) MBit/s ∼57% -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=600)
282 MBit/s ∼28% -68%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (923min - 995max) MBit/s ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (584min - 715max) MBit/s ∼66% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
816 (403min - 832max) MBit/s ∼84% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
772 (691min - 832max) MBit/s ∼80%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (461min - 625max) MBit/s ∼61% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
558 (496min - 582max) MBit/s ∼58% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
534 (468min - 587max) MBit/s ∼55% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=600)
268 MBit/s ∼28% -65%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø870 (841-882)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø772 (691-832)
GPS Test: Outdoors
GPS Test: Inside buildings
GPS Test: GNSS

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra, Amerikan ve Avrupa GNSS'nin çift bant modunda da kullanılabildiği GPS (GNSS), GLONASS, BeiDou ve Galileo uydu ağlarını destekler. Mevcut konumun belirlenmesi iç mekanda oldukça uzun sürüyor ve çok da doğru değil, ancak dış mekanda hızlı ve yüksek hassasiyetle çalışıyor. Zorunlu bisiklet yolculuğumuzda Samsung phablet, Garmin Edge 500 ile karşılaştırmak zorunda. toplam mesafe neredeyse 12 kilometre, ikisi birbirinden sadece 80 metre uzaklıkta. Ayrıntılar söz konusu olduğunda, Note20 Ultra ikna edebilir ve hatta bisiklet bilgisayarından daha kesin bir konum sağlar.

Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge section
Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge section
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Overview
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Overview
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Turning point
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Turning point
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Bridge section
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Bridge section

Telefon ve çağrı kalitesi

Akıllı telefon kulağa tutulduğunda Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra'nın arama kalitesini gerçekten çok seviyoruz. Her iki uçtaki kişiler mükemmel bir şekilde anlaşılabilir ve yüksek ortam gürültüsü bile filtrelenir, ancak eller serbest modundaki performans daha az iyidir. Kullanıcının sesi biraz boğuk geliyor ve akıllı telefon hemen yanınızda değilse, sesiniz yalnızca çok sessiz bir şekilde kaydedilir. VoLTE ve WLAN arama gibi özellikler Galaxy Note20 Ultra tarafından desteklenir.

Kameralar - Geliştirilmiş yakınlaştırmalı Galaxy Note20

Selfie taken with the Galaxy Note20 Ultra

Galaxy Note20 Ultra'nın öne bakan kamerası 10 MP çözünürlüğe ve çift piksel otomatik odaklamaya sahip. Yalnızca gün içinde dengeli özçekimler üretmekle kalmaz, aynı zamanda maksimum 2160p ve 60 FPS çözünürlükle videolar da kaydedilebilir.Arkadaki üçlü kamera kurulumu, Galaxy S20 Ultra ile aynı 108 MP sensöre sahiptir, ancak özellikle otomatik netleme açısından gözle görülür şekilde iyileştirildi. Gün ışığında çekilen fotoğraflar çok iyi görünüyor ve düşük ışıkta bile, akıllı yazılım kullanımı sayesinde kalite ikna edebilir. Samsung burada Apple'ın örneğini takip etti ve yeterli ışık yoksa gece modunu otomatik olarak etkinleştiriyor. Bu davranışı istemiyorsanız, ayarlardan da devre dışı bırakabilirsiniz. Düşük ışık ayarımızda bu, Note20 Ultra'nın fotoğraf çekmek için tam üç saniyeye ihtiyacı olduğu anlamına gelir. Sonuç buna göre iyi ve Huawei P40 Pro'ya kıyasla daha iyi bir sonuç öneriyor, ancak bu izlenim aldatıcı çünkü Huawei akıllı telefonun fotoğrafı çekmek için yalnızca bir dakikaya ihtiyacı vardı. Note20 Ultra'yı aynı anda verirsek sonuç çok daha kötü. Geceleri statik konuları yakalamak istiyorsanız, bunu can sıkıcı bulmayacaksınız, ancak konu insan fotoğrafları olduğunda fotoğraf makinesinin titremesi garanti edilir.Samsung, artık zoom lensi ile doğru yönde büyük bir adım attı çünkü şimdi bir tam teşekküllü 5x optik büyütme (50 kata kadar dijital zoom); Bunun çekilen fotoğraflar üzerinde çok belirgin bir olumlu etkisi var ve Note20 Ultra'yı Huawei'nin rekabete çok yaklaştırıyor. Ultra geniş açının performansı S20 Ultra ile aynıdır. Videolar en iyi ihtimalle saniyede 24 kare ile 8K olarak kaydedilebilir. 60 FPS istiyorsanız, Ultra HD veya Full HD kullanmanız gerekir. Ek olarak, süper ağır çekim ve çok sayıda başka işlev de tekrar kullanılabilir.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow-LightZoomUltraweitwinkel

Galaxy Note20 Ultra, ayarlanmış aydınlatma koşullarında, test çizelgemizi yakalarken yüksek düzeyde ayrıntı gösterir, bu da iyi aydınlatma koşullarında yüksek megapiksel sayısından kaynaklanmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, ince harfler ve kenarların alanı söz konusu olduğunda görüntüde küçük kusurlar var. Renk üretimi nispeten doğal görünüyor ve yalnızca biraz fazla doymuş görünüyor.

ColorChecker
20 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
30 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra: 26.47 ∆E min: 12.19 - max: 38.55 ∆E
ColorChecker
9.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra: 5.98 ∆E min: 2.09 - max: 13.62 ∆E

Aksesuarlar ve garanti - Yedek uçsuz S Pen

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra, modüler bir güç adaptörü (25 watt), bir USB kablosu, bir kulaklık, bir SIM aracı ve belgeler ile birlikte gelir. S Pen için cımbız ve yedek uçlar artık dahil edilmiyor, bu da özellikle mağazada sunulmadığı ve web'de yalnızca yedek kalemler bulunabildiği için sürdürülebilirlik açısından çok tartışmalı. Ayrıca, akıllı telefon için 20 Euro'nun (~ 24 $) hemen altında başlayan çok sayıda isteğe bağlı kasa bulunmaktadır. Akıllı telefonlarını iki yıl boyunca kazara hasarlara karşı sigortalamak isteyen kullanıcılar, bir kerelik ödeme gerektiren Bakım paketini de alabilirler. Ayda 149 Euro (~ 176 $) veya 7 Euro (~ 8 $) ödüyor. Bunun dışında Samsung, ürününe genellikle 24 ay garanti veriyor.

Giriş cihazları ve kullanım - S Pen gücü

S Pen, Galaxy Note serisinin benzersiz satış noktasıdır ve ilk bakışta selefine çok benzer. 4.096'ya kadar basınç seviyesini tanır ve 0,7 milimetre genişliğinde bir uca sahiptir. Giriş gecikmesinin 25 milisaniyeden 9 milisaniyeye iyileştirildiği söyleniyor. Ancak, ABD'deki Samsung web sitesinde yer alan bilgilere göre, bu, kalemdeki değişikliklerden çok 120 Hz panelden çok daha büyük ölçüde kaynaklanıyor; öznel olarak, en azından Galaxy Note10 ile doğrudan karşılaştırmada herhangi bir değişiklik tespit edemedik. Ek olarak, kalemler sorunsuz bir şekilde farklı nesiller arasında değiştirilebilir. Her halükarda, Note20 ile Bluetooth üzerinden de iletişim kuran S Pen'in bekleme süreleri iyileştirildi. Bir önceki modelin 10 saate kadar bekleme süresi varken, şimdi tam 24 saate çıkarıldı. İşlev yelpazesi ne genişletildi ne de azaltıldı. Ekran dışı notlara ek olarak, diğer özellikler arasında her zamanki gibi ekran görüntülerine yazma yeteneği bulunur ve metin, el yazısı tanıma kullanılarak doğrudan Word'de biçimlendirilebilir. Küçük kalem sayısız olasılık sunar ve Note10'a göre biraz daha sıkı hissettiren iyi bir yazma deneyimi sağlamaya devam eder. Kapasitif dokunmatik ekran aynı anda ve çok güvenilir bir şekilde on adede kadar temas noktasını tanır. Corning Gorilla Glass Victus'un kayma özellikleri mükemmel. Ayrıca, biyometrik güvenlik için ekrana bir parmak izi tarayıcısı entegre edildi; yüksek bir tanıma oranına sahiptir ve akıllı telefonun kilidini hızlı bir şekilde açar. Telefonun kilidini açmak, 2B yüz tanıma özelliği ile daha kolay ve daha hızlıdır, ancak aynı zamanda daha az güvenlidir.

Ekran - süper parlak AMOLED ile Samsung

Subpixel grid

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra'nın Dinamik AMOLED ekranı 6,9 inç (17,53 cm) diyagonal boyuta sahiptir, ancak kullanıcılara QHD yüksek çözünürlüğü seçme ve yalnızca kullanma seçeneği sunması bakımından S20 Ultra ile aynı teknik tuzağa sahiptir. 60 Hz veya daha sonra 120 Hz'ye kadar uyarlanabilir yenileme hızı kullanmak için çözünürlüğü Full HD'ye düşürmek. Ortam ışığı sensörü etkinleştirildiğinde panel, saf beyazla ortalama 878 cd / m²'lik son derece yüksek bir parlaklık elde eder. ekranda arka plan ve çok eşit şekilde aydınlatılmış. Eşit dağılımlı aydınlık ve karanlık alanlarla (APL50) yapılan bir ölçümde parlaklık 1,221 cd / m²'ye kadar yükselir ve APL10 testinde 1,350 cd / m²'ye ulaşır. Mükemmel! Ortam ışığı sensörünü devre dışı bırakırsanız, maksimum 399 cd / m² elde edebilirsiniz, ancak sensör çok parlak olduğunda yine de müdahale eder. Galaxy Note20 Ultra, bir OLED panelin tipik titremesine karşı da bağışık değildir, ancak bu 231,5 ile 245,1 Hz arasında ve dolayısıyla oldukça dar bir aralıkta gerçekleşir, bu nedenle hassas kullanıcılar daha az şikayet etme eğiliminde olmalıdır.Aksi takdirde, Samsung, gözleri korumak için son derece yapılandırılabilir bir her zaman açık ekran ve mavi ışık filtresi sunar akşam. HDR10 ve HDR10 da desteklenmektedir.

870
cd/m²
878
cd/m²
889
cd/m²
867
cd/m²
860
cd/m²
889
cd/m²
883
cd/m²
869
cd/m²
898
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 898 cd/m² Ortalama: 878.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.91 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 96 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 860 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Siyah: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.9
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Dynamic AMOLED, 3040x1440, 6.8
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Screen
9%
4%
30%
23%
Brightness middle
860
683
-21%
592
-31%
753
-12%
790
-8%
Brightness
878
694
-21%
605
-31%
762
-13%
790
-10%
Brightness Distribution
96
96
0%
96
0%
96
0%
97
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
2.9
36%
2.5
44%
0.9
80%
1.4
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.4
4.8
54%
5.5
47%
1.6
85%
3.4
67%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
2.2
8%
2.6
-8%
1.5
37%
1.9
21%
Gamma
2 110%
2.11 104%
2.16 102%
2.24 98%
2.23 99%
CCT
6466 101%
6247 104%
6173 105%
6415 101%
6466 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17531 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Adjusted settings

The CalMAN display analysis also shows that the panel of the Galaxy Note20 Ultra is very good. But even with optimal settings, there are competitors that achieve more accurate color and grayscale reproductions than the Samsung phone; this criticism can very much be described as nitpicking, though.

Grayscales (profile: Vivid; target color space: DCI P3)
Grayscales (profile: Vivid; target color space: DCI P3)
Mixed colors (profile: Vivid; target color space: DCI P3)
Mixed colors (profile: Vivid; target color space: DCI P3)
Color space (profile: Vivid; target color space: DCI P3)
Color space (profile: Vivid; target color space: DCI P3)
Saturation (profile: Vivid; target color space: DCI P3)
Saturation (profile: Vivid; target color space: DCI P3)
Grayscales (profile: Vivid (adjusted); target color space: DCI P3)
Grayscales (profile: Vivid (adjusted); target color space: DCI P3)
Mixed colors (profile: Vivid (adjusted); target color space: DCI P3)
Mixed colors (profile: Vivid (adjusted); target color space: DCI P3)
Color space (profile: Vivid (adjusted); target color space: DCI P3)
Color space (profile: Vivid (adjusted); target color space: DCI P3)
Saturation (profile: Vivid (adjusted); target color space: DCI P3)
Saturation (profile: Vivid (adjusted); target color space: DCI P3)
Grayscales (profile: Natural; target color space: sRGB)
Grayscales (profile: Natural; target color space: sRGB)
Mixed colors (profile: Natural; target color space: sRGB)
Mixed colors (profile: Natural; target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Natural; target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Natural; target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: Natural; target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: Natural; target color space: sRGB)
HDR - Mixed colors (target color space: DCI P3)
HDR - Mixed colors (target color space: DCI P3)
HDR - Grayscale tracking (target color space: BT.2020)
HDR - Grayscale tracking (target color space: BT.2020)
HDR - Saturation (target color space: DCI P3)
HDR - Saturation (target color space: DCI P3)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).

Outdoors, the Galaxy Note20 Ultra is absolutely comfortable to use, and it doesn't disappoint in any situation. The combination of super-bright luminosity, high contrast, and low reflection harmonizes perfectly with every sunlight intensity.

The viewing-angle stability is very good due to the OLED technology, and only from very flat viewing angles are a slight loss of brightness and a minimal green tint to be noticed.

Viewing-angle stability

Performance - Exynos 990 with better system performance

The European version of the Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra is equipped with the in-house Exynos 990, which is accompanied by 12 GB of LPDDR5 RAM. An ARM Mali-G77 MP11 GPU is available for graphics processing. We already know this SoC from the Galaxy S20 series, and it definitely delivers strong performance, but it falls short of Qualcomm's current top-of-the-line SoCs. This is particularly annoying because the Snapdragon 865 Plus is installed in other regions, so that the performance gap is even wider than with the S20 models.

The SoC itself performs at the expected level in the benchmarks, but it's slightly improved in the system benchmarks. In some GFXBench test runs, however, the Exynos 990's performance drops a little in the off-screen values, which is due to thermal deficits.

Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
OpenCL Score 5.2 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5532 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5364 - 5532, n=2)
5448 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 5532, n=31)
2001 Points ∼36% -64%
Vulkan Score 5.2 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4789 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4667 - 4789, n=2)
4728 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 4789, n=32)
1731 Points ∼36% -64%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2787 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
2331 Points ∼70% -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points ∼92% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3338 Points ∼100% +20%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (2731 - 2899, n=5)
2800 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=120)
1935 Points ∼58% -31%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
834 Points ∼89% -11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
906 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (903 - 944, n=5)
929 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=120)
551 Points ∼59% -41%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
12561 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
10367 Points ∼79% -17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12280 Points ∼93% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13186 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (12557 - 12561, n=2)
12559 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=420)
5027 Points ∼38% -60%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4965 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4549 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3898 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4261 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4791 - 4965, n=2)
4878 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4965, n=420)
1539 Points ∼31% -69%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
11784 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
9027 Points ∼77% -23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10952 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10008 - 11784, n=5)
10612 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=523)
5967 Points ∼51% -49%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
14551 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
11813 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13142 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (13627 - 14760, n=5)
14391 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=681)
6549 Points ∼45% -55%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3122 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
2571 Points ∼66% -18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3830 Points ∼99% +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3104 - 3230, n=5)
3154 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=174)
2669 Points ∼69% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6378 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
6186 Points ∼76% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼78% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8173 Points ∼100% +28%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6136 - 8783, n=5)
7254 Points ∼89% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 9047, n=174)
3024 Points ∼37% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5178 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4713 Points ∼72% -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼85% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6578 Points ∼100% +27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5042 - 6355, n=5)
5599 Points ∼85% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=174)
2711 Points ∼41% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4273 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3389 Points ∼61% -21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5277 Points ∼95% +23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4063 - 4495, n=5)
4284 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=526)
2223 Points ∼40% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8239 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
6036 Points ∼65% -27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼71% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9356 Points ∼100% +14%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (870 - 9190, n=5)
7112 Points ∼76% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 10043, n=526)
2146 Points ∼23% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6830 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5143 Points ∼64% -25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼80% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7986 Points ∼100% +17%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6638 - 7459, n=5)
7083 Points ∼89% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8386, n=527)
2003 Points ∼25% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4127 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3498 Points ∼68% -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4283 Points ∼83% +4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3935 - 4455, n=5)
4240 Points ∼83% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=558)
2139 Points ∼42% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9536 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5083 Points ∼40% -47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼63% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12694 Points ∼100% +33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (9470 - 11868, n=5)
10329 Points ∼81% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=558)
2890 Points ∼23% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7385 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4618 Points ∼52% -37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼80% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8823 Points ∼100% +19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (7385 - 8485, n=5)
7798 Points ∼88% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=558)
2427 Points ∼28% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4052 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3353 Points ∼68% -17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4895 Points ∼100% +21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼82% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3963 - 4267, n=5)
4091 Points ∼83% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=607)
2103 Points ∼43% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8156 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5712 Points ∼69% -30%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼78% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8299 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼73% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8005 - 8469, n=5)
8260 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 9032, n=607)
1810 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6658 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4940 Points ∼69% -26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼85% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7157 Points ∼100% +7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼76% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6544 - 6896, n=5)
6733 Points ∼94% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7678, n=608)
1723 Points ∼24% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3846 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3273 Points ∼67% -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4729 Points ∼97% +23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼78% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3846 - 4124, n=5)
3990 Points ∼81% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=650)
1973 Points ∼40% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9480 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5043 Points ∼41% -47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼62% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12394 Points ∼100% +31%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼91% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6388 - 11488, n=5)
9004 Points ∼73% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12632, n=649)
2398 Points ∼19% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7152 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4502 Points ∼49% -37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼75% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9123 Points ∼100% +28%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼87% +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5646 - 8097, n=5)
6920 Points ∼76% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=652)
2058 Points ∼23% -71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
39724 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
33268 Points ∼77% -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
32384 Points ∼75% -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼78% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (27431 - 42135, n=4)
37265 Points ∼86% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=794)
15574 Points ∼36% -61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
84533 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
66142 Points ∼32% -22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points ∼36% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
150281 Points ∼73% +78%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +144%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (48476 - 87223, n=4)
74951 Points ∼36% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=792)
27047 Points ∼13% -68%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
67590 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
54233 Points ∼56% -20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points ∼67% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
82937 Points ∼86% +23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (41415 - 68943, n=4)
61100 Points ∼63% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=792)
21110 Points ∼22% -69%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
145 fps ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
95 fps ∼33% -34%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼53% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
203 fps ∼71% +40%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +98%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (145 - 200, n=5)
187 fps ∼65% +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=795)
45.6 fps ∼16% -69%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
110 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
58 fps ∼53% -47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼55% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼82% -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼54% -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (60 - 119, n=5)
81.8 fps ∼74% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=804)
31.4 fps ∼29% -71%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
96 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
89 fps ∼57% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼68% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
122 fps ∼78% +27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (96 - 126, n=5)
109 fps ∼69% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=700)
27 fps ∼17% -72%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
90 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
56 fps ∼62% -38%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (59 - 90, n=5)
65.8 fps ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=708)
22.7 fps ∼25% -75%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
65 fps ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
65 fps ∼65% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼56% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼86% +32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +54%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (65 - 85, n=5)
77.4 fps ∼77% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=563)
21.7 fps ∼22% -67%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
61 fps ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
36 fps ∼47% -41%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼95% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
77 fps ∼100% +26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼78% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (58 - 61, n=5)
59 fps ∼77% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=565)
19.6 fps ∼25% -68%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
17 fps ∼37% -50%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼57% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps ∼65% -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +35%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (22 - 34, n=5)
29.8 fps ∼65% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=319)
11.4 fps ∼25% -66%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
22 fps ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
18 fps ∼62% -18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼69% -9%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +32%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (20 - 23, n=5)
21.8 fps ∼75% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=317)
8.08 fps ∼28% -63%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
49 fps ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
27 fps ∼47% -45%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼69% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼81% -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (49 - 52, n=5)
50.8 fps ∼88% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=323)
17 fps ∼29% -65%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
43 fps ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
48 fps ∼64% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼65% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
54 (20min) fps ∼72% +26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +74%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (43 - 58, n=5)
53.4 fps ∼71% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=322)
19.5 fps ∼26% -55%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
38 fps ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
28 fps ∼44% -26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼65% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼79% +32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (38 - 51, n=5)
47.6 fps ∼76% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=488)
14.5 fps ∼23% -62%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
18 fps ∼38% -47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼71% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
45 fps ∼94% +32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +41%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (34 - 45, n=5)
42 fps ∼88% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=492)
12.9 fps ∼27% -62%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
527820 Points ∼89%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼81% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
595466 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (296746 - 527820, n=5)
469996 Points ∼79% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=117)
320646 Points ∼54% -39%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
33.38 (8.52min - 83.34max) fps ∼39%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29.22 (4.07min - 95.16max) fps ∼34%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (84.1 - 85.6, n=2)
84.8 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)
19.2 fps ∼23%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
27.47 (12.07min - 47.94max) fps ∼52%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31.12 (11.09min - 63.1max) fps ∼59%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (42.3 - 63, n=2)
52.7 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=64)
16 fps ∼30%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
39.13 (10.62min - 99.35max) fps ∼55%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33.9 (9.36min - 74.72max) fps ∼47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (71.5 - 71.6, n=2)
71.5 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=62)
19.9 fps ∼28%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4985 Score ∼70%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7156 Score ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4607 - 4957, n=3)
4783 Score ∼67%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=89)
2609 Score ∼36%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1439 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
1374 Points ∼79% -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼84% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1514 Points ∼87% +5%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (1270 - 1439, n=5)
1351 Points ∼77% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=735)
826 Points ∼47% -43%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10646 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
9092 Points ∼53% -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼59% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11567 Points ∼68% +9%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10646 - 10803, n=5)
10744 Points ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=735)
2543 Points ∼15% -76%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3811 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4646 Points ∼58% +22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼77% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7945 Points ∼100% +108%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼30% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3775 - 4497, n=5)
4037 Points ∼51% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=735)
1895 Points ∼24% -50%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9024 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
7965 Points ∼56% -12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼66% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10002 Points ∼70% +11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8843 - 9478, n=5)
9209 Points ∼65% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=735)
3495 Points ∼25% -61%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4637 Points ∼76% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼89% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6072 Points ∼100% +27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼92% +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4764 - 4915, n=5)
4815 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=735)
1787 Points ∼29% -63%

Surfing the web with the Galaxy Note20 Ultra feels very fast, but it only ends up in the midfield in the benchmarks.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +127%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼51% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
64.958 Points ∼50% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
56.788 Points ∼44%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 56.8, n=5)
53.8 Points ∼42% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samung Browser 9.2)
42.69 Points ∼33% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=194)
40.9 Points ∼32% -28%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +214%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼38% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
115.43 Points ∼38% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
96.234 Points ∼32%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (89.3 - 96.2, n=5)
92.8 Points ∼31% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
84.48 Points ∼28% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=624)
47.5 Points ∼16% -51%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
68.6 runs/min ∼45%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.8 - 64.4, n=4)
60.4 runs/min ∼39%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=176)
42.9 runs/min ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
runs/min ∼0%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +77%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼66% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
118 Points ∼65% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
102 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
101 Points ∼56% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (86 - 102, n=5)
94.4 Points ∼52% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=261)
69.9 Points ∼39% -31%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +151%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼48% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
22834 Points ∼46% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
19695 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
19135 Points ∼39% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (18094 - 20022, n=5)
19019 Points ∼39% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=792)
7939 Points ∼16% -60%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1854 - 59466, n=818)
9717 ms * ∼100% -323%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
2527.8 ms * ∼26% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2294 - 2511, n=5)
2387 ms * ∼25% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
2295.8 ms * ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
2021.2 ms * ∼21% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼20% +15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼6% +75%

* ... smaller is better

Our test device contains 256 GB of UFS 3.1 storage. Optionally, it's also available with 512 GB. The differences compared to UFS 3.0 are not big because the memory bandwidth has remained the same; only the maximum write speeds have been increased considerably, which hasn't been noticeable yet on any of the smartphones that we've reviewed with this new memory type. This will surely change once there are new SoCs.

The storage speed is very high, but it shows a slightly weaker performance when reading and writing small data blocks. But this shouldn't play a noticeable role in everyday life.

The microSD card slot, which we tested with our Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 reference card, is comparatively slow.

Samsung Galaxy Note20 UltraSamsung Galaxy Note10+Huawei Mate 30 ProXiaomi Mi 10 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-7%
7%
13%
8%
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
55.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.47 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
69.22 (Nano Memory Card)
24%
62.5 (55.6 - 69.3, n=2)
12%
51.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=536)
-8%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
65.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
82.49 (Nano Memory Card)
26%
75.7 (65.6 - 85.8, n=2)
15%
69.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=536)
5%
Random Write 4KB
217.74
183.59
-16%
259.21
19%
258.54
19%
229 (205 - 269, n=5)
5%
36.3 (0.14 - 319, n=889)
-83%
Random Read 4KB
186.67
196.22
5%
226.38
21%
264.9
42%
225 (187 - 267, n=5)
21%
59.6 (1.59 - 324, n=889)
-68%
Sequential Write 256KB
802.09
588.06
-27%
401.79
-50%
750.44
-6%
768 (732 - 802, n=5)
-4%
129 (2.99 - 911, n=889)
-84%
Sequential Read 256KB
1782.3
1503.7
-16%
1780.5
0%
1738.65
-2%
1704 (1675 - 1782, n=5)
-4%
344 (12.1 - 1802, n=889)
-81%

Games - The Note20 Ultra is optimally equipped

The Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra offers a good overall package for gamers. Besides a large 120 Hz display and good speakers, it also has a powerful SoC. With our partner GameBench, we took a closer look at a few titles.

With PUBG Mobile, Samsung sets an ironclad 40 FPS limit, no matter which graphics setting we choose. But in return, the game is very stable and can be played without frame drops. With Dead Trigger 2, the adaptive refresh rate can be observed very well, because the smartphone continuously adjusts the FPS even while playing the game. A small catch: The high frame rates are not possible with all titles. In this way, we can only select 60 FPS with Armajet (up to 144 FPS).

PUBG Mobile
Dead Trigger 2
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.19.0: Ø39.8 (37-41)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 0.19.0: Ø39.8 (37-41)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.19.0: Ø39.9 (37-41)
; Dead Trigger 2; 1.6.9: Ø88 (57-118)

Emissions - Low performance under load

Temperature

GFXBench battery test

The surface temperatures are harmless at all times, and even under load, the Samsung smartphone doesn't even get lukewarm.

Inside, however, the Note20 Ultra faces bigger problems as the Manhattan scenario of the GFXBench battery test shows. The corresponding benchmark is executed thirty times in a row, and both the battery values and the frame rates are logged. After just the seventh run, the Note loses around a third of its original performance, and after the twentieth run, the loss increases to around 50%. Other smartphones like the Asus ROG Phone 3 persistently achieve almost three times the frame rate. So it's no wonder that Samsung directly limits the frame rate in games accordingly.

Maksimum yük
 32.9 °C33.1 °C30.8 °C 
 33.8 °C33.3 °C31.3 °C 
 32.5 °C33 °C30.7 °C 
Maksimum: 33.8 °C
Ortalama: 32.4 °C
29.1 °C30.7 °C30 °C
29.1 °C31.1 °C30.3 °C
28.8 °C30.7 °C30.7 °C
Maksimum: 31.1 °C
Ortalama: 30.1 °C
Güç kaynağı  25.8 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

Speakers

Pink Noise measurement

The two speakers in the Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra provide a balanced sound. They are sufficiently loud, but as expected, they lack the low-bass range.

Alternatively, headphones can be connected to the USB port or Bluetooth can be used for wireless systems. The latter supports Dual Audio again, so that two Bluetooth devices can be supplied with audio signals at the same time. With SBC, AAC, aptX and LDAC, several audio codecs are supported, but you'll have to do without aptX HD or the newer aptX Adaptive.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.923.3252923.73121.927.44022225029.935.36322288019.330.710016.331.31251440.316016.956.120014.954.625014.158.63151066.74001165.750011.766.763010.969.480011.972.310001176.4125010.276.8160011.477.8200012.879250012.979315012.578.440001378.5500013.175.8630013.475.3800015.776.11000013.573.5125001470.31600013.763.9SPL24.888.8N0.677.4median 13median 72.3Delta1.18.332.239.436.225.529.126.83027.742.342.426.827.220.325.22536.717.244.817.954.317.153.817.95316.253.616.55615.35915.664.415.664.814.867.214.472.314.67314.776.914.176.414.476.914.475.914.973.514.773.814.57214.866.6156316.649.427.185.80.961median 15median 64.81.29.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Note20 UltraApple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Battery life - Larger battery in the Note20 Ultra

Energy consumption

The Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra's power consumption is at a good level and is only comparatively high under full load. However, the measurements show that the communication modules require a little more power.

In addition to wireless charging at up to 15 watts, the smartphone also supports Wireless PowerShare to charge other devices. When using a cable, fast charging at 25 watts is supported, so nothing has changed compared to the Note10+ here.

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.01 / 0.24 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 0.65 / 1.06 / 1.49 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 4.91 / 10.29 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
4300 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-31%
-13%
9%
-49%
-22%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
0.65
0.7
-8%
0.87
-34%
0.61
6%
0.92
-42%
0.846 (0.65 - 1, n=5)
-30%
0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=897)
-37%
Idle Average *
1.06
1.81
-71%
1.75
-65%
1.19
-12%
2.9
-174%
1.534 (1.06 - 1.91, n=5)
-45%
1.756 (0.6 - 6.2, n=896)
-66%
Idle Maximum *
1.49
1.92
-29%
1.83
-23%
1.23
17%
2.94
-97%
1.858 (1.49 - 2.3, n=5)
-25%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=897)
-37%
Load Average *
4.91
7.57
-54%
3.85
22%
4.18
15%
3.65
26%
5.14 (4.72 - 5.8, n=5)
-5%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=891)
16%
Load Maximum *
10.29
9.34
9%
6.64
35%
8.53
17%
6.18
40%
10.7 (9.99 - 11.8, n=5)
-4%
6.11 (1.2 - 14.2, n=891)
41%

* ... smaller is better

Battery life

The battery of the Galaxy Note20 Ultra has a capacity of 4,500 mAh and is thus mainly responsible for the slightly better battery life compared to its predecessor.

Otherwise, the situation is similar to what we had already observed with the S20 models. The battery life is good as long as the communication modules are not involved. Although the results are also still good in our tests with activated WLAN, the runtimes are considerably shorter than with the competitors.

With moderate usage, a day of use is certainly easily possible. But if you communicate a lot, take pictures or even play games online, you will have to recharge in between.

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
20h 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 84)
10h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 33min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
5h 38min
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
4300 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
21%
16%
53%
Reader / Idle
1223
1585
30%
2174
78%
2133
74%
2618
114%
H.264
993
934
-6%
1098
11%
973
-2%
1346
36%
WiFi v1.3
644
532
-17%
823
28%
865
34%
909
41%
Load
338
305
-10%
219
-35%
198
-41%
408
21%

Artılar

+ HDR10 ile süper parlak OLED ekran
+ iyi konuşmacılar
+ S Pen
+ güçlü üçlü kamera kurulumu
+ genişletilebilir depolama
+ Wi-Fi 6, 5G ve eSIM
+ IP68 sertifikası

Eksiler

- yavaş microSD yuvası
- 120 Hz yalnızca Full HD'de
- ne aptX HD ne de aptX Adaptive
- SoC politikası

Verdict - A tough choice

In review: Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra. Review device provided by Samsung Germany.
In review: Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra. Review device provided by Samsung Germany.

At the time of testing, the Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra is one of the best smartphones available. The phablet shines in the test with a very bright AMOLED display, high system speed, a good and versatile camera, pleasing speakers, and a fancy design. And then there's the S Pen, a very mature product with many great features.

The Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra offers a pretty complete package, and the three-year update promise guarantees a long life.

Only a look at the details reveals minor annoyances; these include, above all, the dilemma of the different SoCs, which simply leaves a bad taste in your mouth. Not only is the performance weaker with the Exynos SoC, but the energy efficiency suffers as well, and 5G has to deal with the lack of mmWave support. The calibration of the display could have been a bit more accurate too; although this is hardly noticeable to the naked  eye, it prevents a better rating for the display. In addition, we would have also expected from a high-end product that the panel's 120 Hz mode worked at QHD+ resolution too.

For Note lovers, there's no way around the Galaxy Note20 Ultra anyway, but owners of last year's version in particular will find little incentive to upgrade, since Samsung simply hasn't improved some details at all. Users who don't have an issue with the high price will get a great smartphone.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - 09/03/2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt

İşcilik
96%
Klavye
68 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
98%
Bağlanılabilirlik
70 / 70 → 100%
Ağırlık
88%
Batarya
89%
Görüntü
88%
Oyun performansı
57 / 64 → 88%
Uygulama performansı
80 / 86 → 93%
Isınma
94%
Ses
100%
Audio
83 / 90 → 92%
Camera
80%
Ortalama
84%
89%
Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra incelemesi - Güçlü özelliklere sahip akıllı telefon ve S Pen dahil
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-10- 3 (Update: 2020-10- 3)
Aslinur Sarica
Translator: Aslinur Sarica - Translator