Notebookcheck

2020 Razer Blade Pro 17 incelemesi: 300Hz bir laptopa gerçekten ihtiyacınız var mı?

Fast display for a fast laptop. 240 Hz'den daha yüksek yenileme hızı seçenekleri sunan ilk 17,3 inç oyun dizüstü bilgisayarıdır. Bununla birlikte, süper bir meraklı değilseniz, 300 Hz ile geçen yılın 240 Hz paneli arasındaki farkı söylemek zor olacak.
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo,

Razer, son zamanlarda 10.3 Core Core i7 işlemciler, isteğe bağlı GeForce Super Max-Q GPU'lar, daha fazla ekran seçeneği ve daha uzun bir Shift tuşu ile 17.3 inç Blade Pro 17 serilerini 2020 için yeniledi. Buradaki birimimiz, geçen yılki modelde "sadece" 240 Hz yerine 300 Hz ekran için dikkat çeken en son modelin en ucuz yapılandırmasıdır. 2020 Blade Pro 17, işlemci, ekran ve hafif klavye farklılıklarından başka aslında 2019 Blade Pro 17 ile aynı özellikler ve tasarım. Bu nedenle, dizüstü bilgisayarın şasi, bağlantı noktaları ve diğer fiziksel özellikleri hakkında daha fazla bilgi edinmek için 2019 modelindeki mevcut incelememize göz atmanızı öneririz. MSI GS75, Asus Zephyrus S GX701, Dell Alienware m17 R2 veya Eluktronics RP-17 gibi diğer yüksek kaliteli ultra ince 17,3 inç oyun dizüstü bilgisayarlarını içerir: Daha fazla Razer yorumu: Blade Pro 17 4K UHDBlade 15 Studio EditionBlade StealthRazer Phone 2

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
İşlemci
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Grafik kartı
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Çekirdek: 1420 MHz, Bellek: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, 442.53, Manual
Bellek
16384 MB 
, Samsung DDR4-3200, 21-21-21-47, Dual-Channel, 2x SODIMM
Görüntü
17.3 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, SHP14D8, parlak: hayır, 300 Hz
Anakart
Intel HM470
Harddisk
Lite-On CA5-8D512, 512 GB 
Ses kartı
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Bağlantılar
5 USB 3.0, 5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 5 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm combo, Kart okuyucular: SD reader (UHS-III)
Network
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 19.9 x 395 x 260
Batarya
70 Wh Lithium-Polymer
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: Stereo, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, Razer Synapse, 12 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
2.718 kg, Güç kaynağı: 784 g
Fiyat
2600 USD
Bağlantılar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87 %
06/2020
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.7 kg19.9 mm17.3"1920x1080
81 %
12/2019
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.7 kg18.7 mm17.3"1920x1080
83 %
07/2019
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.3 kg18.9 mm17.3"1920x1080
84 %
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.6 kg20.5 mm17.3"1920x1080
87 %
06/2020
Aorus 17G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.7 kg26 mm17.3"1920x1080

Durum

405 mm 276 mm 26 mm 2.7 kg399.8 mm 295.5 mm 20.5 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 272 mm 18.7 mm 2.7 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.7 kg396 mm 259 mm 18.9 mm 2.3 kg

SD Kart Okuyucu

One of the few laptops to integrate a UHS-III SD card reader
One of the few laptops to integrate a UHS-III SD card reader
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 17G XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
212 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208.5 MB/s ∼98%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198.5 MB/s ∼94% -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181.3 MB/s ∼86% -13%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181 MB/s ∼85% -13%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 17G XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
247 MB/s ∼100% +19%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208.3 MB/s ∼84%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
204 MB/s ∼83% -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198 MB/s ∼80% -5%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197.9 MB/s ∼80% -5%

İletişim

Intel AX201, Bluetooth 5.1 ve Wi-Fi 6 bağlantısı için standarttır. Netgear RAX200 test yönlendiricimize bağlandığında herhangi bir sorunla karşılaşmadık.

Removable M.2 WLAN module
Removable M.2 WLAN module
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1520 MBit/s ∼100% +29%
Aorus 17G XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1260 MBit/s ∼83% +7%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1182 (min: 1085, max: 1338) MBit/s ∼78%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
638 (min: 625, max: 645) MBit/s ∼42% -46%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
634 (min: 621, max: 646) MBit/s ∼42% -46%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1283 (min: 1089, max: 1413) MBit/s ∼100%
Aorus 17G XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1260 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
880 MBit/s ∼69% -31%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
623 (min: 577, max: 656) MBit/s ∼49% -51%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
496 (min: 459, max: 531) MBit/s ∼39% -61%
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1182 (1085-1338)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1283 (1089-1413)

Web kamerası

ColorChecker
4.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz: 8.71 ∆E min: 1.66 - max: 21.72 ∆E

Bakım

Easy access to RAM and storage with a T5 Torx screwdriver
Easy access to RAM and storage with a T5 Torx screwdriver

Giriş cihazları

Keyboard feedback remains identical to the 2019 model. Secondary symbols may not be lit depending on region
Keyboard feedback remains identical to the 2019 model. Secondary symbols may not be lit depending on region
Shift key is now longer at the expense of smaller Up and Down arrow keys
Shift key is now longer at the expense of smaller Up and Down arrow keys

Görüntüle

Yeni 1080p 300 Hz ekran, 2020 Blade Pro 17'yi önceki sürümlerden ayıran ayırt edici bir faktördür. Dizüstü bilgisayar, Blade 15 veya Gigabyte Aero 17'de "sadece" 240 Hz ile karşılaştırıldığında Sharp LQ173M1JW02 IPS paneliyle gelen ilk veritabanımızdır. Geçen yılın 4K UHD 120 Hz panelini tercih eden kullanıcılar bunun yerine 2020'de hala bu seçeneğe sahipler 1080p300 panel, belirgin çözünürlük ve yenileme hızı farklılıkları dışında yukarıda belirtilen parlak 4K120 panel ile karşılaştırıldığında bazı avantajlara ve dezavantajlara sahiptir. Parlaklık aralarında neredeyse aynı olmasına rağmen, 4K panel, daha derin ve daha doğru renkler için 300 Hz panelimizden daha geniş bir renk kapsamı ile biraz daha yüksek bir kontrast oranı sunar. Buna karşılık, 300 Hz panel gölgelenmeyi sınırlamak için daha hızlı siyah-beyaz ve gri-gri tepki sürelerine sahiptir. Söylemeye gerek yok, görsel deneyim günlük iş yüklerinde 240 Hz'den daha iyi hissetmese de 300 Hz yenileme hızı ipeksi bir pürüzsüzlük hissi veriyor.

Once you become accustomed to 120 Hz or faster monitors, it's hard going back to 60 Hz
Once you become accustomed to 120 Hz or faster monitors, it's hard going back to 60 Hz
Side bezels are much narrower than the top and bottom bezels
Side bezels are much narrower than the top and bottom bezels
Minor uneven backlight bleeding along the corners and bottom edge
Minor uneven backlight bleeding along the corners and bottom edge
Matte panel exhibits very little graininess, but it's still not going to be as crisp as the glossy 4K option
Matte panel exhibits very little graininess, but it's still not going to be as crisp as the glossy 4K option
368.4
cd/m²
356.9
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
323.2
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
287.1
cd/m²
293.1
cd/m²
308.3
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
Sharp LQ173M1JW02
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 368.4 cd/m² Ortalama: 329.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16.4 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 78 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 328 cd/m²
Kontrast: 937:1 (Siyah: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.74 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 2.12
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 64.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Aorus 17G XB
AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
AU Optronics B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
Response Times
11%
-17%
-110%
-106%
-90%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5.6 (2.6, 3)
5.6 (2.4, 3.2)
-0%
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
-29%
17.2 (8.8, 8.4)
-207%
16 (7.6, 8.4)
-186%
15.2 (8.4, 6.8)
-171%
Response Time Black / White *
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
7.6 (3.4, 4.2)
21%
10 (5.2, 4.8)
-4%
10.8 (6, 4.8)
-13%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
-25%
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
-8%
PWM Frequency
25510 (17)
26320 (25)
Screen
23%
31%
32%
31%
3%
Brightness middle
328
288
-12%
366
12%
384.2
17%
293
-11%
346.7
6%
Brightness
329
276
-16%
343
4%
357
9%
285
-13%
332
1%
Brightness Distribution
78
93
19%
91
17%
90
15%
95
22%
91
17%
Black Level *
0.35
0.24
31%
0.29
17%
0.29
17%
0.24
31%
0.27
23%
Contrast
937
1200
28%
1262
35%
1325
41%
1221
30%
1284
37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.74
1.92
59%
1.51
68%
1.35
72%
1.27
73%
5.62
-19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.99
4.57
49%
3.22
64%
3.45
62%
2.24
75%
9.36
-4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.12
1.14
46%
0.71
67%
1.42
33%
1.06
50%
3.81
-80%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.8
3.08
55%
1.93
72%
1.2
82%
1.34
80%
5.5
19%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.42 91%
2.38 92%
2.23 99%
2.38 92%
2.25 98%
CCT
6446 101%
7055 92%
6881 94%
6580 99%
6542 99%
6175 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
64.8
65
0%
60
-7%
65.5
1%
73
13%
87.2
35%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98.6
96
-3%
94
-5%
98.5
0%
94
-5%
100
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
17% / 21%
7% / 24%
-39% / 10%
-38% / 10%
-44% / -11%

* ... smaller is better

Renk alanı 4K UHD 120 Hz seçeneğinden daha dardır. Kullanıcılar 4K alternatifinde tam AdobeRGB yerine tam sRGB kapsamı bekleyebilirler. Bunun şu anda piyasada tam AdobeRGB kapsamı olan 15.6 inç 300 Hz paneller bulunmadığından şüpheleniyoruz.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Ekran kutudan daha iyi kalibre edilmiş olabilir. Renk sıcaklığı biraz fazla sıcaktır ve bunun gibi amiral gemisi bir dizüstü bilgisayar için ortalama 6.8 gri tonlamalı DeltaE nispeten yüksektir. Paneli kendimiz kalibre etmek, daha doğru bir ekran için sorunları giderir.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.6 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18037 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Dış mekan görünürlüğü, 2019 modelinden veya bu konudaki diğer oyun dizüstü bilgisayarlarından çok daha iyi veya daha kötü değildir. ~ 300 nit ekran, mat katmana bakılmaksızın böyle parlak ortam aydınlatmasının üstesinden gelecek şekilde tasarlanmamıştır.

Outdoors on a cloudy day
Outdoors on a cloudy day
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors on a cloudy day
Outdoors on a cloudy day
Wide IPS viewing angles
Wide IPS viewing angles

Verim

Tüm 2020 seçenekleri, geçen yılki 9. nesil altıgen çekirdekli Core i7-9750H'yi başarmak için 10. nesil sekiz çekirdekli Core i7-10875H ile standart olarak geliyor. Diğer oyun dizüstü bilgisayarlarının aksine Razer, hexa-core Core i7-10750H'yi sunmaz. Core i9 da burada mevcut değil, ancak bu ince ve hafif oyun dizüstü bilgisayarları için MSI GS66'da gördüklerimize dayanarak önerebileceğimiz bir şey değil.RAM DDR4-2667'den DDR4-2933'e yükseltildi . İki erişilebilir SODIMM yuvası 64 GB'a kadar izin verir.Nvidia Optimus dahil değildir, ancak kullanıcılar Razer Synapse yazılımı aracılığıyla entegre ve ayrık GPU'lar arasında manuel olarak geçiş yapabilir. Her seferinde yeniden başlatma gerekecektir. Manuel grafik geçişi genellikle G-Sync desteği anlamına gelir, ancak burada mevcut değildir. Rahatsız edici bir şekilde, sistemi kablosuz devre dışı bırakıldığında Razer Synapse her zaman giriş ekranında sıkışacaktır. Kablosuz ekranını yeniden etkinleştirmeniz ve ardından giriş ekranını geçmek için Synapse'i tamamen yeniden başlatmanız gerekir.

 
Synapse window for controlling fans, power profile, display refresh rate, and graphics switching
Synapse window for controlling fans, power profile, display refresh rate, and graphics switching

İşlemci

CPU performansı, veritabanımızdaki ortalama Core i7-10875H işlemciden biraz daha yavaştır. Yine de, ham çok iş parçacıklı performans, Core i7-9750H ile geçen yılki Blade Pro 17'ye göre yaklaşık yüzde 45 daha hızlı. Bu elbette yüzde 45 daha hızlı kare hızlarına dönüşmeyecek, ancak içerik oluşturucular neredeyse kesinlikle ek çekirdeklerden daha fazla faydalanacak. AMD'nin bugüne kadar etkileyici Ryzen serisi ile Intel'e çok fazla baskı yaptığı için Razer'ın Ryzen 7 4800H seçenekleri sunmaması çok kötü. CineBench R15 Multi-Thread'ı bir döngüde çalıştırırken, 1494'ün ilk yüksek puanı yaklaşık yüzde 9'luk bir performans düşüşünü temsil etmek için ikinci döngü 1360 puana iner. Daha fazla teknik bilgi ve karşılaştırma karşılaştırmaları için Core i7-10875H'deki özel sayfamıza bakın.

CineBench R15
CineBench R15
CineBench R20
CineBench R20
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820Tooltip
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1362 (1352.68-1494.38)
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1773 (1724.58-1815.79)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1640 (1625.22-1699.96)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1572 (1548.11-1671.4)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) - CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4288 Points ∼100% +27%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
4136 Points ∼96% +23%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4132 Points ∼96% +23%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3843 Points ∼90% +14%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
3712 Points ∼87% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (3155 - 3823, n=8)
3447 Points ∼80% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
3367 Points ∼79%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3224 Points ∼75% -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
2888 Points ∼67% -14%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H
2328 Points ∼54% -31%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
1906 Points ∼44% -43%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) - CPU (Single Core)
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
495 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (479 - 511, n=8)
495 Points ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
483 Points ∼98%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
478 Points ∼97% -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
478 Points ∼97% -1%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
477 Points ∼96% -1%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
476 Points ∼96% -1%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
441 Points ∼89% -9%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
437 Points ∼88% -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H
431 Points ∼87% -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
428 Points ∼86% -11%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit - CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1863 Points ∼100% +20%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1816 (min: 1724.58, max: 1815.79) Points ∼97% +17%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1754 Points ∼94% +13%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points ∼92% +11%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1708 (min: 1581.15, max: 1708.45) Points ∼92% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1370 - 1833, n=11)
1671 Points ∼90% +8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
1549 (min: 1352.68, max: 1494.38) Points ∼83%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1398 (min: 1313.46, max: 1397.77) Points ∼75% -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
1308 Points ∼70% -16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H
1094 Points ∼59% -29%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
839 (min: 755.39, max: 839.42) Points ∼45% -46%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit - CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
206 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (190 - 214, n=11)
206 Points ∼100% +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
200 Points ∼97%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
195.82 Points ∼95% -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
195 Points ∼95% -2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
193 Points ∼94% -3%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points ∼92% -5%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
189 Points ∼92% -5%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
180 Points ∼87% -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
178 Points ∼86% -11%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼85% -12%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU - BMW27 CPU
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
555 Seconds * ∼100% -71%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
379.1 Seconds * ∼68% -17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
345 Seconds * ∼62% -6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
324 Seconds * ∼58%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (285 - 356, n=6)
321 Seconds * ∼58% +1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
297 Seconds * ∼54% +8%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
293 Seconds * ∼53% +10%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
278 Seconds * ∼50% +14%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
271 Seconds * ∼49% +16%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 - 7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5463 MIPS ∼100% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5245 - 5457, n=6)
5345 MIPS ∼98% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
5245 MIPS ∼96%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
5086 MIPS ∼93% -3%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
4924 MIPS ∼90% -6%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4717 MIPS ∼86% -10%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
4662 MIPS ∼85% -11%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4634 MIPS ∼85% -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4471 MIPS ∼82% -15%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 - 7z b 4
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
48837 MIPS ∼100% +45%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
48577 MIPS ∼99% +44%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
46976 MIPS ∼96% +40%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
46591 MIPS ∼95% +38%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (33674 - 47170, n=6)
41461 MIPS ∼85% +23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
36693 MIPS ∼75% +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
33674 MIPS ∼69%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
32386 MIPS ∼66% -4%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
22139 MIPS ∼45% -34%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1352 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1233 - 1347, n=6)
1293 Points ∼96% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
1278 Points ∼95%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
1227 Points ∼91% -4%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1189 Points ∼88% -7%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
1143 Points ∼85% -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1108 Points ∼82% -13%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8104 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7782 Points ∼96% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (6988 - 8139, n=6)
7663 Points ∼95% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
7531 Points ∼93%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
6317 Points ∼78% -16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
5260 Points ∼65% -30%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
4032 Points ∼50% -46%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset - 4k Preset
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13 fps ∼100%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
12.2 fps ∼94%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
12.193 fps ∼94%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
11.865 fps ∼91%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (10.2 - 13, n=5)
11.7 fps ∼90%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
9.41 fps ∼72%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
9.27 fps ∼71%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
6.34 fps ∼49%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF - 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
64.1 s ∼100% +11%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
61.4 s ∼96% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (52.4 - 84.3, n=6)
59.1 s ∼92% +2%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
58.9 s ∼92% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
57.8 s ∼90%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
53.4 s ∼83% -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
50.24 s ∼78% -13%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean - Overall mean
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.676 sec * ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.626 sec * ∼93%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.626 sec * ∼93%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.596 sec * ∼88%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (0.547 - 0.584, n=5)
0.57 sec * ∼84%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.564 sec * ∼83%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1549 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
166 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
200 Points
Yardım

Sistem performansı

PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
9128 Points ∼71% +7%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8862 Points ∼68% +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
8560 Points ∼66%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8344 Points ∼64% -3%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
7330 Points ∼57% -14%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
5514 Points ∼43% -36%
Productivity
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
8253 Points ∼79% +3%
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8237 Points ∼79% +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
8028 Points ∼77%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7654 Points ∼73% -5%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
7622 Points ∼73% -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7357 Points ∼71% -8%
Essentials
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
10239 Points ∼89% +4%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
9933 Points ∼87% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9927 Points ∼87% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
9831 Points ∼86%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
9501 Points ∼83% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9405 Points ∼82% -4%
Score
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6571 Points ∼81% +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6290 Points ∼78%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6202 Points ∼76% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6049 Points ∼75% -4%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
5804 Points ∼72% -8%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
5502 Points ∼68% -13%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6593 Points ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6317 Points ∼96%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
5818 Points ∼88% -8%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
5716 Points ∼87% -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4755 Points ∼72% -25%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5319 Points ∼87% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
5217 Points ∼86%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
4461 Points ∼73% -14%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
4384 Points ∼72% -16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4255 Points ∼70% -18%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5217 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6317 puan
Yardım

DPC Gecikmesi

LatencyMon, ana sayfamızda birden çok sekme açarken DPC gecikme sorunlarını gösterir, ancak gecikme Asus veya MSI'dan diğer bazı oyun dizüstü bilgisayarlarında kaydettiğimiz kadar kötü değildir. YouTube'da 4K video oynatımı, atlanan kareler olmadan düzgün kalır.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
8851.6 μs * ∼100% -760%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
2951.7 μs * ∼33% -187%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
2840.6 μs * ∼32% -176%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
1029.5 μs * ∼12%

* ... smaller is better

Depolama aygıtları

Hemen hemen tüm Razer dizüstü bilgisayarlar bir Samsung veya Lite-On SSD ile birlikte gelir, ancak ikisinden hangisini alabileceğinizi bilmek zordur. Özel ünitemiz, Samsung SSD PM981a'dan genellikle daha yavaş performans için 512 GB Lite-On CA5-8D512 NVMe sürücüyle donatılmıştır. Bununla birlikte, çok sayıda küçük dosyayla çalışan bir içerik oluşturucu değilseniz, muhtemelen farkı fark etmeyeceksiniz.

CDM 5.5
CDM 5.5
AS SSD
AS SSD
Empty secondary M.2 2280 bay for expansion
Empty secondary M.2 2280 bay for expansion
Primary Lite-On drive
Primary Lite-On drive
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Lite-On CA5-8D512
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
Aorus 17G XB
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
AS SSD
41%
26%
68%
54%
Copy Game MB/s
1506.29
1152.18
-24%
1532.82
2%
1368.42
-9%
Copy Program MB/s
621.74
426.44
-31%
625.96
1%
538.56
-13%
Copy ISO MB/s
1714.9
2226.35
30%
1926.01
12%
1876.88
9%
Score Total
2392
4259
78%
3624
52%
4972
108%
5215
118%
Score Write
1034
1589
54%
1447
40%
2294
122%
2115
105%
Score Read
913
1776
95%
1437
57%
1755
92%
2037
123%
Access Time Write *
0.167
0.038
77%
0.107
36%
0.032
81%
0.106
37%
Access Time Read *
0.058
0.054
7%
0.051
12%
0.07
-21%
0.049
16%
4K-64 Write
812.64
1224.16
51%
1137.27
40%
1957.87
141%
1774.98
118%
4K-64 Read
664.71
1459.72
120%
1217.48
83%
1525.36
129%
1805.45
172%
4K Write
90.18
96.3
7%
100.83
12%
116.76
29%
104.12
15%
4K Read
46.61
30.31
-35%
25.88
-44%
50.72
9%
43.42
-7%
Seq Write
1314.33
2686.95
104%
2093.64
59%
2192.74
67%
2354.22
79%
Seq Read
2019.26
2855
41%
1937.52
-4%
1790.65
-11%
1880.65
-7%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
4%
-3%
5%
-10%
Write 4K
119
95.46
-20%
110.6
-7%
123.4
4%
121.7
2%
Read 4K
51.87
42.59
-18%
41.46
-20%
45.02
-13%
43.81
-16%
Write Seq
2258
2851
26%
2378
5%
2526
12%
1276
-43%
Read Seq
2283
2696
18%
2114
-7%
2062
-10%
1183
-48%
Write 4K Q32T1
491
402.6
-18%
445.4
-9%
497.9
1%
526.5
7%
Read 4K Q32T1
539.7
443.9
-18%
509.3
-6%
578.5
7%
592.1
10%
Write Seq Q32T1
2253
3420
52%
2735
21%
2982
32%
2379
6%
Read Seq Q32T1
3172
3514
11%
3206
1%
3440
8%
3213
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
23% / 28%
12% / 15%
37% / 41%
22% / 31%

* ... smaller is better

Lite-On CA5-8D512
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3172 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2253 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 539.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 491 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2283 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2258 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.87 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 119 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720173017401750176017701780179018001810182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020203020402050206020702080209021002110212021302140215021602170218021902200221022202230224022502260227022802290230023102320233023402350236023702380239024002410242024302440245024602470248024902500251025202530254025502560257025802590260026102620263026402650266026702680269027002710272027302740275027602770278027902800281028202830284028502860287028802890290029102920293029402950296029702980299030003010302030303040305030603070308030903100Tooltip
: Ø3044 (2836.4-3096.86)

GPU Performansı

Geçmişte, eski Max-Q ve daha yeni Super Max-Q GeForce GPU'lar arasındaki performans farklarının o kadar dar olabileceğini, eski Max-Q GPU'larına sahip bazı dizüstü bilgisayarların bazen daha yeni Super Max-Q muadillerinden daha iyi performans gösterebileceğini kaydettik. Bu durumda, Razer'ımızdaki RTX 2070 Max-Q, Aorus 17G'deki yeni RTX 2070 Süper Max-Q'yu ve hatta MSI GS66'daki RTX 2080 Süper Max-Q'yu sürekli olarak geride bırakabilir. Razer bir RTX 2080 Super Max-Q seçeneği de sunuyor, ancak RTX 2070 Max-Q ile "yerleşmeye" karar verirseniz çok fazla kaybolacağınızı düşünmeyin. GeForce RTX 2070 Max'deki özel sayfamıza bakın. -Q daha teknik bilgi ve oyun kriterleri için.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Time Spy
Time Spy
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
9854 Points ∼100% +22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
8844 Points ∼90% +10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
8065 Points ∼82%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7732 Points ∼78% -4%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
7618 Points ∼77% -6%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
7358 Points ∼75% -9%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
7294 Points ∼74% -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (5948 - 8065, n=22)
6643 Points ∼67% -18%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
6312 Points ∼64% -22%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5335 Points ∼54% -34%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
3749 Points ∼38% -54%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H
3461 Points ∼35% -57%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
10012 Points ∼100% +22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
8460 Points ∼84% +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
8236 Points ∼82%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7878 Points ∼79% -4%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
7633 Points ∼76% -7%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
7475 Points ∼75% -9%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
7261 Points ∼73% -12%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
6610 Points ∼66% -20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (5989 - 8236, n=22)
6606 Points ∼66% -20%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5406 Points ∼54% -34%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
3751 Points ∼37% -54%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H
3554 Points ∼35% -57%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
25497 Points ∼100% +20%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
23032 Points ∼90% +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
21191 Points ∼83%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
21004 Points ∼82% -1%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
20117 Points ∼79% -5%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
19338 Points ∼76% -9%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
19230 Points ∼75% -9%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
18807 Points ∼74% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (11563 - 21191, n=25)
17351 Points ∼68% -18%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
14753 Points ∼58% -30%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
12038 Points ∼47% -43%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H
9621 Points ∼38% -55%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
18934 Points ∼100% +22%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
16266 Points ∼86% +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
15564 Points ∼82%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13742 Points ∼73% -12%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
13592 Points ∼72% -13%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
13126 Points ∼69% -16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
12170 Points ∼64% -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (9107 - 15962, n=24)
12085 Points ∼64% -22%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
11416 Points ∼60% -27%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
10270 Points ∼54% -34%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H
8969 Points ∼47% -42%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
7358 Points ∼39% -53%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
34846 Points ∼100% +26%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
30910 Points ∼89% +12%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
27955 Points ∼80% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
27694 Points ∼79%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
26855 Points ∼77% -3%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
26413 Points ∼76% -5%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
25706 Points ∼74% -7%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
24465 Points ∼70% -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (14723 - 27694, n=24)
22097 Points ∼63% -20%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
19329 Points ∼55% -30%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
15145 Points ∼43% -45%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H
13168 Points ∼38% -52%
3DMark 11 Performance
23306 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
48701 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18543 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score
8236 puan
Yardım
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Aorus 17 YA
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
95.4 (min: 80) fps ∼100% +18%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
85.1 (min: 71) fps ∼89% +5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
81 (min: 72, max: 91) fps ∼85% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
80.9 (min: 75, max: 90) fps ∼85%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
74.3 fps ∼78% -8%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
73.6 (min: 62) fps ∼77% -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (57 - 80.9, n=24)
65 fps ∼68% -20%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
63 fps ∼66% -22%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
55.6 (min: 53, max: 60) fps ∼58% -31%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
39.6 fps ∼42% -51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
37.4 fps ∼39% -54%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
161 (min: 133) fps ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
151.4 (min: 144, max: 166) fps ∼94%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
145 (min: 127, max: 163) fps ∼90% -4%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
142.7 fps ∼89% -6%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
142 (min: 118) fps ∼88% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (86.5 - 151, n=18)
119 fps ∼74% -21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
108.9 fps ∼68% -28%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
103 (min: 98, max: 108) fps ∼64% -32%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
66 fps ∼41% -56%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
66 fps ∼41% -56%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Aorus 17 YA
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
133.8 (min: 117.2) fps ∼100% +6%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
129 (min: 112.4) fps ∼96% +2%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
126 (min: 109.6) fps ∼94% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
126 (min: 108.2) fps ∼94%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
119.6 (min: 103.2) fps ∼89% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (106 - 126, n=6)
118 fps ∼88% -6%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
117.9 fps ∼88% -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
116.8 (min: 99) fps ∼87% -7%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
116 (min: 101.2) fps ∼87% -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
107.5 (min: 90.7) fps ∼80% -15%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
104 (min: 91) fps ∼78% -17%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160